Assessment of writing ability for LG 112 For the LA Faculty Cohort Lorena B. Ellis Spring 2011 During the spring 2011 semester, twenty one students attending two courses of LG112, Elementary German II submitted writing assignments: one was a formative assessment, and one a final assessment. The formative assessment consisted of two writing assignments one in prose and one in verse. (See details in the attachment). The objective was to have the students work with the vocabulary learned in class and transform the words into meaningful sentence. The objective was to help students in the preparation for the written part in the final exam. The two writing samples were not graded, but corrected and returned to the students for revisions. The samples of students’ writings submitted to the Freshmen Academy, Liberal Arts Cohort with this report were the final versions of this the formative writing assignment. The final/cumulative assessment was graded according to the rubric below that was divided in 4 categories: completion of the task, level of discourse, vocabulary, grammar. (see bottom of this document). The results the data gathered from 21 students who completed the written assessment in LG112 Elementary German II were as follows: Table 1: SCORING SHEET- LG 112 General Performance in Each Category Task completion Maximum score Average # of Students 4 3.5 21 Level of Discourse Vocabulary 4 3.3 21 Grammar 4 3.3 21 Total 4 3.2 21 16 13.3 21 The total points a student could achieve (adding up all four categories) was 16. The scale agreed upon beforehand by the FL Assessment Committee defined the following ranges: 0-9.5 points = student performance does not meet expectations; 10-12.5 points = student performance almost meets expectations; 13-14.5 points = student performance meets expectations; 15-16 points = student performance exceeds expectations. Table 2: OVERALL. Student performance - 21 students Range Does not meet expectat. 0‐9.5 Almost meets expectations 10‐12.5 Meets expectations 13—14.5 Exceeds expectations 15‐16 2 4 6 9 9% 20% 28% 43% # 0f Students Percentage Data indicates that 15 (71%) of the students assessed meet expectations: 9 were writing at a higher level than the one required by the course, 6 were writing at the required level. However 29% did not meet expectations: 4 of them (19%) almost met the required level and two of them (9%) did not meet expectations. 2 The visual representation of the above results are represented in Chart 1(below). Table 3 Number of students’ performance in each category: Levels 4 3 2 1 Total Task Completion Level of Discourse Vocabulary Grammar 14 8 11 7 4 10 6 12 3 3 3 1 0 0 1 1 21 21 21 21 Table 3 and Chart 2(below) shows that vocabulary is the category that is in greater need of improvement, followed by vocabulary and level of discourse. Although the majority (71%) of students assessed met expectations (43% exceeded and 28% met expectations), 29% did not meet expectations (20% almost met and 9% did not meet expectations). The expectation is normally that 75 per cent of the students 3 are expected to meet the course standards. It was not the case here. Therefore, the 6 students out of 21, who performed below the expected level, need to be coached to reach the course standards. I believe that one of the solutions is to increase the number of formative assessment during the semester and at least two final assessments should be submitted and graded before the final exam. The revision process will help them improve their writing and prepare them better for the final assessment in the written part of the final exam. Elementary Level (LG 111 - LG 112) Writing Task Holistic Rubric Exceeds expectations Task Completion Level of Discourse Vocab. Grammar Superior completion of the task. Students fully address the information requested, and provide additional details Sentences are fully developed and interconnected with conjunctions (e.g. AND, BUT, or BECAUSE Rich use of vocabulary Perfect control of the syntactic structures required (Accuracy level 90% - 100%). 4 POINTS Completion of task. Students fully address the information provided, but do not provide additional details 4 POINTS Sentences are fully developed. Cohesive devices are sporadically used 4 POINTS Adequate and accurate use of vocabulary 3 POINTS 3 POINTS 3 POINTS 3 POINTS Partial completion of task. Students complete no more than 60% of the information requested Sentences are somewhat complete. Rare use of cohesive devices Somewhat inadequate and/or inaccurate use of vocabulary 2 POINTS 2 POINTS 2 POINTS Emerging control of the syntactic structures Several grammatical imperfections (Accuracy level 61% - 78%). 2 POINTS Minimal completion of task. Students complete less than 40% of the information requested. Sentences are mostly incomplete. No use of cohesive devices Inadequate and/or inaccurate use of vocabulary Minimal control of the syntactic structures. Numerous grammatical errors (Accuracy level 0%60%) 1 POINT 1 POINT 1 POINT 1 POINT 4 POINTS Meets expectations Almost meets expectations Does not meet expectations Adequate control of the syntactic structures. Some grammatical imperfections (Accuracy level 79% - 89%). 4 Assessment of writing ability for LG 112 + POEM First assessment Write a poem in German on any topic you would like: what you like to do in your fee time, or your favorite person, your favorite music, etc. Look at the vocabulary list from the 1st. & 2nd. semesters: Treffpunkt Kapitel 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, & Kapitel 6). See examples of poems at the bottom of this page. DRAFT Due: Revised March 10, 2011; Final version to be posted in BB > DiscusionBoard > Forum > POEM = GEDICHT April 6, 2011. You may include: The person’s name, age, where s/he lives What s/he does for a living His/her personality His/her appearance Activities s/he likes to do, etc. Your text will be assessed according to these categories: Level 2 Writing (prose and poems) Tasks - Holistic Rubric* Comprehensibility Exceeds expectations Text readily comprehensible, requiring no interpretation on the part of the reader 16-20 points Meets expectations Text comprehensible, requiring minimal interpretation on the part of the reader 11-15 points Almost meets expectations Text mostly comprehensible, requiring interpretation on the part of the reader Level of Discourse Vocabulary Grammar Mechanics Variety of complete sentences and of cohesive devices Rich use of vocabulary Control of basic language structures Few or no errors in spelling, use of punctuation and/or capitalization 16-20 points 16-20 points Emerging variety of complete sentences, some cohesive devices 11-15 points Use of complete sentences, some repetitive, few cohesive devices 6-10 points 6-10 points Does not meet expectations Text barely comprehensible 0-5 point Predominant use of complete yet repetitive sentences, no or almost no cohesive devices 0-5 point 16-20 points 16-20 points Adequate and accurate use of vocabulary for this level 11-15 points Somewhat inadequate and/or inaccurate use of vocabulary and too basic for this level 6-10 points Inadequate and/or inaccurate use of vocabulary Emerging control of basic language structures 11-15 points Emerging use of basic language structures Mostly accurate spelling, use of punctuation and/or capitalization 11-15 points Somewhat inaccurate spelling, use punctuation and/or capitalization 6-10 points 6-10 points Inadequate and/or inaccurate use of basic language structures 0-5 point 0-5 point *Adapted from A-M.Bourbon’s rubric to be used for German prose and poems. The points were changed to show differences within each level and to facilitate grading. Inaccurate spelling, use punctuation and/or capitalization 0-5 point 5 Samples of poems See BB > DiscusionBoard > Forum > POEM = GEDICHT Ich habe morgen eine Klausur Heute ändere ich meine Frisur Und studiere viel Literatur Ich hoffe, es verbessert meine Zensur. (Treffpunkt Kapitel 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, & Kapitel 6, L.B.Ellis, 2-28-11) Assessment of writing ability for LG 112 + POEM GEDICHTE: Bertolt Brecht: Source: http://www.gedichte-garten.de/forum/ftopic87.html Eins zwei drei vier Mein Vater trinkt Bier Vier drei zwei eins Meine Mutter trinkt keins Fragen Schreib Schreib Schreib Schreib mir, mir, mir, mir, was du anhast! Ist es warm? wie du liegst! Liegst du auch weich? wie du aussiehst! Ist´s noch gleich? was dir fehlt! Ist es mein Arm? Schreib Schreib Schreib Schreib mir, mir, mir, mir, wie´s dir geht! Verschont man dich? was sie treiben! Reicht dein Mut? was du tust! Ist es auch gut? woran denkst du? Bin es ich? Freilich hab ich dir nur meine Fragen! Und die Antwort hör ich, wie sie fällt! Wenn du müd bist, kann ich dir nichts tragen. Hungerst du, hab ich dir nichts zu Essen. Und so bin ich grad wie aus der Welt Nicht mehr da, als hätt ich dich vergessen. Der Radwechsel Ich sitze am Straßenrand. Der Fahrer wechselt das Rad. Ich bin nicht gern, wo ich herkomme. Ich bin nicht gern, wo ich hinfahre. Warum sehe ich den Radwechsel Mit Ungeduld? Der, den ich liebe ... Der, den ich liebe Hat mir gesagt Dass er mich braucht. Darum Gebe ich auf mich acht Sehe auf meinen Weg und Fürchte von jedem Regentropfen Dass er mich erschlagen könnte. 6 QUEENBOROUCH COMMUNITY COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES AND LITERATURES Course Outline LG112 COURSE INFORMATION Course number and title: LG112 PNET Beginning German II Hours: 4 + 1 (laboratory), 4 credits or online activities Prerequisite: German I or appropriate Foreign Language Placement. Students planning to take LG 213 must obtain a final grade of C or higher in this course. LG 112 students with a final grade lower than C will not be admitted in LG 213. INSTRUCTOR INFORMATION Name: Dr. Lorena B. Ellis E-mail: LEllis@qcc.cuny.edu Fax: (718) 631-6261 Tel.: (718) 631-6259 Office: H220 Voicemail: (718) 281-5444 Office Hours: MW 2:00-2:50 and 5:00-5:50pm or appt. http://www.qcc.cuny.edu/ForeignLanguages/LEllis/ TEXTS: Required: You must bring your textbook with you to every class. Treffpunkt Deutsch Fifth Edition Rosemarie E. Widmaier, McMaster University Fritz T. Widmaier, McMaster University Margaret Gonglewski, The George Washington University 0-13-195546-2 978-013-195546-2 Publisher: Prentice Hall, Copyright: 2008 Dictionaries and Websites recommended Leo GmbH Copyright © LEO GmbH 2006-10 [http://dict.leo.org/trainer/index.php?lang=de&lp=ende] Ein Online-Wörterbuch Service Technischen Universität München. Beolingus ©TU Chemnitz , 2006-2007 a bilingual online dictionary with spelling and pronunciation [http://dict.tuchemnitz.de/] Online sites: QCC Blackboard: http://www.qcc.cuny.edu/ CUNY Portal > User Name + Password http://webgerman.com/Animated/index.html Type any text with German characters: http://german.typeit.org/ Information on Culture in German Speaking countries: www.german-way.comQCC Blackboard: http://www.qcc.cuny.edu/ Grammar Doubts: http://webgerman.com/Animated/index.html Type any text with German characters: http://german.typeit.org/ Information on Culture in German Speaking countries: www.german-way.com COURSE DESCRIPTION/MATERIAL TO BE COVERED German II aims at increasing the student's ability to use basic forms of oral communication in German through constant use of the everyday idiom. Carefully graded practice in reading and writing supplement the conversational aspects of the course. We will cover Kapitel 5 to Kapitel 8 in the textbook Treffpunkt Deutsch (5th ed.) and the corresponding worksheets as well as online activities (QUIA) corresponding to each Kapitel.at the end of each lesson. Additional listening comprehension 7 exercises will be available in Blackboard (BB), as well as writing exercises. Results of both need to be posted in the Discussion Board (BB). We also will work on vocabulary, grammar, pronunciation, oral comprehension, conversation, spelling and writing. Speaking, oral comprehension, and conversation will be emphasized. GENERAL EDUCATION OBJECTIVES You will be able to: Communicate effectively through reading, writing, listening and speaking. Use analytical reasoning to identify issues or problems and evaluate evidence in order to make informed decisions. COURSE OBJECTIVES AND EXPECTED STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Upon successful completion of this course students will be able to: Accomplish basic communicative tasks (e.g., order a meal in a restaurant, shop) by relying on guided input. Describe in oral and written form about their own and others’ daily activities. Describe in oral and written form rudimentary past and future events. Express commands and causality, give simple advice, or suggestions in given situations. Narrate and/or provide information about themselves and others EVALUATION METHODS Assessment of you conversational skills will be assessed by evaluating the clarity, the fluidity and the accuracy of their responses to questions, role plays, simulations, picture descriptions, or storytelling. Your listening abilities will be assessed by evaluating their general understanding of auditory messages such as ads, or short dialogues, narratives or descriptions. Assessment of your reading skills will be done by evaluating their degree of comprehension of a variety of reading materials including ads or simple stories. Assessment of your writing skills (including knowledge of grammar) will be done evaluating the grammatical and lexical accuracy and the appropriateness of their writing samples including narrations, descriptions and letter writing. Grade Distribution The final grade for the course will consist of: Final written examination Final oral examination Midterm test Quizzes Oral as well as written work related to class activities (i.e. class participation (5%) and dictations 10%, home/online work 10%). (20%) (5%) (30%) (20%) (25%) Exams/Qizzes There will be graded listening comprehension activities and at least 6 oral and/or written quizzes, a midterm, and a final exam. The in-class quizzes, midterm and the final exam will include different sections: vocabulary, reading, grammar, listening comprehension, and writing. Any material covered in the text, or in the language laboratory, or assigned homework, or covered in class, may be used in a quiz or exam. N.B. All exams are mandatory. If you have a legitimate reason to miss an exam, you must provide appropriate documentation. Otherwise there are no make-ups for missed exams. Homework & other assignments Homework assignments should be completed daily. They are checked at the beginning of each class. Assignments handed in late will be worth only 50% of the grade on homework. In order to really learn from these exercises, you should study the material first, do the exercises to the best of your ability, and then check the answers at the following class meeting. Portions of these exercises may be adapted for use in quizzes and exams. 8 ATTENDANCE and PARTICIPATION Students are expected to attend class and to arrive on time. Be aware that every two instances lateness will be counted as an absence. If you have to be absent, please notify instructor beforehand if possible. Furthermore, be sure to get any assignment, as well as any information provided in class from a class mate. An absence is no excuse for not being prepared for the following class, or for not handing in homework on time. Therefore, absences should be kept to a minimum. Language learning is interactive and therefore requires your active participation and involvement in all class activities. Class participation is measured by your preparedness, alertness and contributions to activities and discussions. If you leave early, or sleep in class, or pop in and out of the room frequently, come to class without your text, or fail to participate in class, it will reflect negatively in your participation grade. More than three unauthorized absences will lower final course grade. More than eight unauthorized absences will determine a grade of WU for the course (Departmental Policy). If the instructor is late, please wait 15 minutes sign an attendance (class, name, date) sheet before leaving and hand it in (room H214). ACADEMIC INTEGRITY:(department and college) The Foreign Language Department abides by Queensborough Community College Policy regarding Academic Integrity. Cheating on a quiz or exam as well as the act of plagiarizing (stealing the words or ideas of another) will result in an F grade for the course. It may also lead to suspension or dismissal from the College. For more details, refer to the Academic Integrity Policy stated in the 2009-2010 College Catalogue, p. 44-45. DISSABILITIES Any student who feels that he/she may need an accommodation based upon the impact of a disability should contact me privately to discuss his/her specific needs. Please contact the office of Services for Students with Disabilities in Science Building, room 132 (718 631 6257) to coordinate reasonable accommodations for students with documented disabilities. SCHEDULE HA (Hausaufgabe)=> Home Assignments = BLAU Tests & Exams = ROT Note that the homework (HA=Hausaufgabe) assignments are normally in the textbook as worksheets (WS) at the end of each chapter, or handouts (HO) will be given. They are due on the day after the material has been presented and practiced in class. In any event, your teacher will remind you daily of the homework due on the next day. In the first class of each week there will be a graded dictation (Dict.) or listening comprehension (LC) exercise. Week 1, Mon. 1-31 to 2-4: Introduction & Review 1st. semester Important: Buy the book (if you do not have it from the 1st. semester (fall-2010) Objective I: Review the basic structures and vocabulary from the previous semester Quiz preparation: verbs in the present (regular, stem-changing and modal verbs), vocabulary, expressions, adjective endings in the nominative and in the accusative Week 2 Feb.7 to 11 Kap.5 Quiz1: 2-9 (online) (1st. semester) Talking about persons or things without naming them 1. Personal pronouns in the accusative case Expressing direction, destination, time, manner, and place 2. Accusative prepositions durch, für, gegen, ohne, um Two expressions for “around” gegen um 3. Dafür and dagegen Wer ist für das neue Rauchgesetz? ich bin dafür. Making comparisons 4. The comparative of adjectives and adverbs Ich bin dagegen. 9 Week 3 Feb. 12 to 18 Kap.5 Making comparisons and superlative 5. The superlative of adjectives and adverbs 6. An adjective in the superlative before a noun David hat das neueste Notebook. Word Order 7. Object clauses introduced by “dass” Ich hoffe, dass du bald einen guten Job findest. 8. Questions as object clause (Indirect questions) Weiβt du, ob wir morgen ins Kino gehen? Weiβt du, wann wir morgen ins Kino gehen? Talking about what and whom you know 9. The verb “wissen” Weiβt du, wie viel Uhr es ist? 10. Verbs “wissen” versus “kennen” wissen = know something as a fact kennen = be familiar with smthg or be acquainted with someone. Week 4 Feb.22* to Feb.28 Talking about events in the past Kap.5 Quiz#2 on 2-23 (Kap.5) 11. The simple past of sein, haben and the modal verbs dürfen, können, mögen, müssen, sollen durfte konnte Week 5 Mar.1 to Mar 7 Talking about events in the past Kap.6 1. The perfect tense of regular verbs 2. The perfect tense of irregular verbs 3. The verb “sein” as auxiliary in the perfect tense Week 6 Mar 8 to Mar 14 More on the Past Kap.6 4.The perfect tense of verbs with separable prefixes 5.The perfect tense of verbs with inseparable prefixes 6. The perfect tense of mixed verbs Week7 Mar.14 to Mar. 21 Ranking people and things Kap.6 Quiz#3 on 3-16 Kap.6) 7. Ordinal numbers and dates Writing Personal letters 8. Conventions in writing personal letters Indicating direction away from and toward 9. Hin und her as directional suffixes and prefixes Week 8 Mar.22 to Mar.30 Review, Oral, Midterm on 3-30 (Kap.5 & Kap.6) Group project draft ready; Assessment of online activities 10 Week 9 Mar. 31 to April 4 Kap.7 Indicating the person to whom or for whom something is done 1.The dative case: the indirect object 2.The interrogative pronoun in the dative case 3. The Personal pronouns in the dative case Week 10 Apr. 5 to Apr.11 Kap.7 4. Word order sequence of objects 5. Dative verbs 6. The dative case with adjectives Week 11 April 12 to Apr.16 Kap.7 Quiz 4 on 4-13 (Kap.7) Expressing origin, destination, time, manner and place 7. The dative prepositions 8. Contractions 9. Da-compounds 10. “nach” versus “zu” und “aus” versus “von” Describing people, places and things 12. Adjective endings in the dative case. 12.a. Adjective endings preceded by ”der-words” 12.b. Adjective endings preceded by “ein-words” 12.c. Adjective endings of un-preceded adjectives Spring Recess: Apr.17 to Apr. 26 Week 12 April 27 to May 3 Kap.8 Talking about destination and location 1. Wohin und wo: review. 2. Two-case prepositions 3. Contractions 4. The verbs stellen/stehen, legen/liegem, hängen 5. More on da-compounds 6. German an, auf, in, and English to Week 13 May 4 to May 10 Saying when something occurs Kap.8 7. The two-case prepositions an, in, vor, and zwischen in time phrases 8. Infinitive Phrases 9. Infinitive phrases introduced by “um” Indicating possession or relationships 10. The genitive case Word Order Describing people, places and things 11. Genitive endings of preceded adjectives Review Kap. & Kap.8 for final Week 14 May 11 to May 18 Kap.8 Quiz#5 on 5-18 (Kap.8) Review (Kap. 5,6,7, & 8) for final, Oral Assessment Week 15 May 19 May 23 LAST WEEK OF CLASSES including Assessment and Final Exam Final exam 5-22 (Kap. 5,6,7, & 8)