MONITORING OF ACCOUNTABILITY
NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM & SNACK PROGRAM UNDER NSLP-(S-NSLP)
1. Name of School
. County/SFA
2. School’s current enrollment
Average Daily Attendance
. Today’s attendance
.
.
.
3. School’s average daily participation, (Average Daily Participation)
School’s attendance factor
.
.
4. Number of students currently eligible for free, reduced price meals. Free
. Reduced
5. The policy statement was implemented as approved. Yes
.
No
6. The counting system yielded an accurate count of lunches by category served to students.
Yes
No
Total
(students). Program Adults
meals served to students
. Today’s lunch count: Free
Reduced
, Non-Program Adults
Paid
.
, Number of non-reimbursable
.
7. The system for recording and reporting lunches served by category was correct. Yes
No
8. Lunch counts by category for the previous month were reasonable compared to lunch counts for the review
day. Yes
No
9. Prior to submission of a claim, attendance adjusted eligibles by category were compared to daily meal counts at
the school. (Edit Checks)
Yes
No
. If no, explain
10. Required food items/components were available to all students participating in the NSLP.
Yes
No
11. Lunches claimed for reimbursement contained the required food items, and quantities. Yes
12. Lunches met nutrient analysis goals for the day (Option A). Yes
No
No
Monitoring of Accountability
Page 2
13. Production records, local recipes, standardized recipes, menus, manufacturer’s nutrition fact sheets, CN Labels,
etc. were available to determine nutrient analysis of meals. Yes
No
14. A variety of low fat fluid milk was available throughout the serving period(s) on all serving lines.
Yes
No
. If no, explain.
15. The school’s HACCP plan, as developed, was being followed, and was up-to-date. Yes _______ No_______.
16. Offer vs. serve was properly implemented (if applicable)? Yes
No
17. Procedures have been established to receive complaints alleging discrimination. Yes
No
18. Correct procedures were in place for counting, recording, receipting, reporting and depositing food service
money daily. Yes
No
19. Was corrective action taken at this school? Yes
No
. Will a follow-up visit be made
within 45 days to ensure noncompliance(s) had been corrected? Yes
No
. Date planned to
return
. (Document and file the results of the follow-up visit).
20. Daily snack counts for the “At Risk” or “Traditional” snack program under NSLP(S-NSLP) were accurately
counted. Yes
No
21. The meal pattern was met for the S-NSLP as evidenced by Production Records. Yes
No
22. Correct procedures were in place for counting, recording, receipting, and reporting money received in the Snack
Program. Yes
No
23. Attendance records were maintained for the Snack Program. Yes
Reviewer’s Signature
No
Date_______________
SFA’s MUST monitor each site by February 1 and maintain documentation of on-site monitoring visits.
To ensure the school implements corrective action, conduct a follow-up review within 45 days. Maintain
documentation of the follow-up review(s).
WVDE-ADM-40
2006-2007