COMMLISS: Communications / Library & Information Science Services Team COMMLISS: What we’re doing Identify how and where to most effectively provide Library services to all disciplines and communities engaged in the fields of Library & Information Science and Communications Studies Develop a service profile (or profiles) attuned to the evolving research and teaching needs in each of these fields COMMLISS: Members Team Leader Communications Library, Head LIS Library, Head LIS & Comm Library, Staff GSLIS Faculty Katie Newman Lisa Romero Sue Searing Lori Carroll Linda Smith College of Media Faculty Brant Houston (Chair of the LIS Library Advisory Committee) (Chair of the College of Media Library Committee) Administrative Liaison JoAnn Jacoby COMMLISS: Considerations Shifting demographics of the academic programs The interdisciplinary nature of the fields The limitations of the available library spaces Available assessment data Present and future needs, based on surveys, focus groups COMMLISS: Assessment data for LIS Room Count, Social Science Division Libraries – FY07 Average People / Hour 30 25 BEL CMX CPL ESSL 20 Labor LIS 15 10 5 0 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul COMMLISS: Assessment data for LIS Average people / hour, Social Science Division Libraries – FY07 COMMLISS: Assessment data for LIS 2006 Faculty Survey: “My primary libraries are Library Science AND…” All: STX 15: Ref, UGX 10: ESSL, Engineer’g 5: Bio, ACES, RBR, Engl, AHS, Com, BEL Relationship Between Circulation & Web Transactions (2006 data) More virtual More physical COMMLISS: Assessment data for LIS COMMLISS: Assessment data for LIS Relationship Between Circulation & Web Transactions: LIS is proportionately more virtual than Comm, RBR, Hist, Engl, etc. COMM LIS COMMLISS: LIS realities Highly interdisciplinary user base LEEP contributes to Low onsite usage High virtual usage, including emails Need to purchase more virtual materials Money for staffing has been curtailed Success of librarian’s office hours in GSLIS COMMLISS: Conclusions so far A simple merger of the print collections of two units does little to further the browsing or service needs of either constituency We have set the idea of a merger aside to consider other models better attuned to the evolving needs of students and researchers