Acta Polytechnica Hungarica
REFEREE REPORT FORM
Referee:
Paper’s Title:
Author(s):
Paper #
(from EasyChair)
PART A: Strictly confidential comments to be addressed to the Editor
Below you can enter some confidental comments to the editor, if you have any:
PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ANSWER BY ENTERING AN X IN THE APPROPRIATE FIELD.
PLEASE, USE THIS SCALE:
False = 1
Rather false = 2
Questionable = 3
Rather true = 4
True = 5
I General Judgment
The author is familiar with the existing state of knowledge.
1 2 3 4 5
The topic is relevant to the scope of Acta Polytechnica Hungarica.
1 2 3 4 5
This is a new and original contribution.
1 2 3 4 5
The paper makes a valuable contribution to the practice of Acta Polytechnica Hungarica.
1 2 3 4 5
The title is appropriate.
1 2 3 4 5
The abstract and keywords are adequate.
1 2 3 4 5
The paper is logically and technically correct.
1 2 3 4 5
The interpretations and conclusions are sound and justified by the results.
1 2 3 4 5
The paper is well presented and organized.
1 2 3 4 5
1
The writing style/English is clear and understandable.
1 2 3 4 5
The paper is of the right length (min. 12 and max. 20 pages).
1 2 3 4 5
The references are adequate.
1 2 3 4 5
II Rating of his paper in comparison to similar
papers published in top-rated scientific journals:
 Below publication level
 Bottom 20%
 Below average
 Average
 Above average
 Top 20%
III Reviewer’s suggestion:
 strong accept
 accept
 weak accept
 borderline paper
 weak reject
 reject
 strong reject
PART B: Reviewer Blind Comments to be forwarded to the Authors
Paper’s Title:
Author(s):
Paper #
(from EasyChair)
Your comments to the authors:
 Please, send back electronically to Péter Tóth by e-mail
(executive.editor@uni-obuda.hu) as an attached file.
2