Department of the Air Force
Military Family Housing
Fiscal Year (FY) 2006/2007
Budget Estimates
Justification Data Submitted to Congress
February 2005
FAMILY HOUSING
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
NARRATIVE SUMMARY
--~--
~
---
This Military Family Housing request reflects the Air Force's commitment to revitalize
inadequate houses and provide service members with homes that meet contemporary standards
similar to the size and floor pattern of homes constructed in the local community. The Air Force
created the Air Force Family Housing Master Plan (FHMP) as the "roadmap" to guide our
planning and programming of investment, operations and maintenance, and privatization in
military family housing.
This budget request fully funds the AF FHMP to meet Air Force's 2007/2009 goal: eliminating
all inadequate housing units in CONUS by FY 2007 (except 4 northern bases by FY 2008) and
overseas by FY 2009. The Air Force FHMP provides a balanced, requirements based strategy
that integrates and prioritizes traditional construction and operations and maintenance, with a
measured approachto privatization into a single "roadmap." The FHMP recognizes that we rely
on the local community to provide 60 percent of our military family housing needs. When local
community housing is unavailable, or inadequate, or demand for base housing is high due to
economic factors, we construct, replace, improve, or repair and maintain existing military family
housing to modem-day, industry standards. Also, where possible and fiscally appropriate, we
attempt to lease adequatehousing for our families.
Consistent with AF FHMP priorities, this budget provides a program that emphasizes
construction to upgrade homes to whole-house standards,and supports operations and
maintenance of our housing inventory for daily operations to "keep the doors open" and where
needed to keep "good housesgood." In this way we prevent deterioration in our existing
adequate inventory. We are accelerating revitalization of inadequate homes in the worst
condition by improving or replacing to contemporary standards,where economically justifiable.
The operations, maintenance and leasing accounts predominantly support "must pay"
requirements. These costs include service contracts, lease contracts, utilities, and essential
maintenance for operating the units and contract funding to correct life safety, health, and facility
preservation issues that cannot wait for MILCON funding.
DoD developed a new Housing Requirements and Market Analysis (HRMA) process to
determine the housing requirements in 2003. As a result, the Air Force conducted HRMAs for
all installations in 2003/2004. The on-base housing requirements were reduced and surplus
housing identified. The Air Force established policy and strategy to dispose of the unneeded
surplus housing through Military Construction (MILCON), privatization, conveyance, transfer,
conversions and demolition. This budget request reflects the implementation of our surplus
housing policy and strategy.
.
The Air Force is also committed to continuing a measured approachto privatization to revitalize
where projected life-cycle costs are similar or better than traditional military construction and
operations and maintenancelife-cycle costs. The AF FHMP proposesthree additional housing
privatization initiatives in FY 2006. We propose to privatize more than 2,200 housing units at
'.,
.
c"'-"'--
February 2005
Page No.
3 0 7
~
,;:::
DEPARTMENT OF urn AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
threebases:PetersonAFB andAir ForceAcademy,CO; and F.E. WarrenAFB, WY. The
alternativeprojectwill only be executedif privatization is unsuccessful.Thesethree
improvementprojectshavea total budgetcostof$65.1 million.
We believethis fundingprofile representsa well-balanced,fiscally constrainedprogram. By
allocatingmore fundsto constructioninvestment,we are more aggressivelyattackingour
inadequateunits, and ensuringM&R dollars are working to fund "must pay" bills and essential
housingrepairs. We respectfullyrequestfull supportfor the Air Force family housingneeds
presentedherein.
February2005
PageNo.
.-
308
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
Program AssessmentRating Tool
The Administration has applied the Program AssessmentRating Tool (PART) to the DoD
Family Housing Program. The Housing PART received high scores for purpose and planning. It
also revealed that DoD needs to work toward eliminating inadequate housing by 2007,
eliminating all out-of-pocket housing expenses,and privatize government-owned housing, where
feasible. For more details see next chart.
.
February 2005
Page No.
309
~
.-00'
-0
>
0) ,-
e
.0
'"
'...
v
~.=
v,
'"
r~'\
-~
~
~
><
~
~tJ
--~V
~
...0
~
~
~
~
~
§--=a
i
~~
~
~
<.
~'u;
~
,b
Q
'.
~
~
.~
~...
~
Q g -0
~.:t
~
~
o.s
~
-.!.
~
~
~
~
Q,,;
.a.
'"
~
'"
0) .g
'"
~
~
~..c
'" 2.
~ >
00 ~
~
~
~ -.'"v
E
~.5
~
~;=:
~
'"
s...
go
8:
~ '"
~
~
...~
~
~
~
v
-0
v.5
'"
'"
"E -.-0
'" "tU
~
0
CD
~
,-
.-0
.5
",'"
""'.A
~
.=
'"
0
0
'"
'"
G)
~n
N~
'.g
",.5
>.~'"
'c ='= g
~
"'=
g
.-Q.
~
~
v'e~
= .-v
v->
~
~ =.=
?' U
.5 -d "0
N
<0
0
0)
~
~
~
~
a)
r-.:
M
N.
0
~
In
CD
0)
r-.
N
r-.
0)
~
a)
II)
0)
0)
0)
~
~
~
~0)
0
11;
II)
~
~CD
~N
C'!.
N
~
~.
N
...r-.
In'
In .0
'"
~
~
~
v
0
0
,..:
~
N
0
>'"
~ ;3
"'~u
~ ,- "0
In
M
In
u
~
~'+;
2.
",
,3
~~ .a ~
6 ~ 0
V
'"
~'~.0 ~
.
=~=
",
...M. In
~~
N
~
~
E
U g'.~ ~ §
In
~
'..
'1:3
.o~~
]~~
~
-v--~
CD
>
v
.'ti'g
~.=
In
..0).
=
.-v
~
..v
-o!.t:u
v'-
-U"~
~
i;
0)
~
~
=
s
'"
c
v
.0
00
10
=
~-.
~
0
~ ~
£0.0.=
-a>
0)
0)
-0
'""'~ .->>- ~
.5 g.
=
0 0
~
0 '-= 2.'"
~~
-g 00"tU
;..,
~
0)
~ 1
~;3
N
r-
N
j£ "0
~a
~~
,.
O._~
-0
.-v
v
~
~
~
.g
~
E
~"Z;'};
-III W In.
~
~-~
-,
~
~
.~
-""
~
'~.s
~
,0)5
V)~Po
'"
~
~
~
"'I
~
'C 00 8
~.S
0
0
~ ...:
U
'..
~
U
0
.00
0)
=
Q
S
~=
O)~
.§
-0
00
-.~
~
><
>v
~ ,~
"'
Po..
""
,-,
~
~
~
'"
...
0)
'"
U
§",
.-0)
~
-v
Po
;..,
~
~
,-
"'
NUO)
'"
.-.~
'"
..c
0
~
ut'J
'="'"
0
v
'"."'.=Po
~-~
~ "'.0) =
a",
~.
,--
0
0
~
II)
0
0
00
N
N
N
0
0
~N
CD
'"
8
~
In
CD
'"
N
N
N
N
0
0
N
0
0
0
0
~
8
Po'+; ~
v03
>< Po'a
In
0
0
0
0
N
N
'"
v .., 00
~
U
~
v.-
°"i~
po.,
Eo..
~
""
;...
...'
'..
~
""
0<.
I
~
~
I::
~-
~.o
~
~,N
~
~"
""J
~
'-~
-'"
N
"
"
~
~
..\\j
~
~
~
~
~..
~
~
Q.;
~
E
~
~"
-.0
'"
~
\\j
1""\ ~
~
'--6"" -'"
~~
~
~
\\j
tJ
~
\\j "-..,E
(:.
...~
~
~
;::
Q
~
0<.
.,'.
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
=
~
~
In
r-.
'!ij
0
0
O;i
N
>-
0).0
~
!!.
ca
"
C"
QI
"tJ
ca
~
~
-~
5
~Q)
~..
~
i:
~
".0
III E
I.;
~"
..S!! ~;
i:'
~.c
t:'"~
QI(I)
""'...
U
~
0)"
~
~
5~
-J ~
O)'U;.5
In .c
" ~
°ca
.-,"a;~
~ E
u0 ca
J:c:
~"
.-0
QI
0
-.c
~
III
.c
900...
U
n
co
~
QI
N
~
'"
.>
I:
Co
In
."='
"
0)
.,c
~ 'u;
" g
~ .c
Q)-
:2;0
"'(ij10
"E
~ "
~ Z
<j>
..g
-ca
,,~
0 .,
In
"'=
QI.0
0
E
QI~
E.g
Q)U
"U~
~ .--r~
0
I+!.Q.=
0 v
.S
00",0
cE
r-
.-0
~ 0) ~
0
SOO~
0 0
u ~.+;
2
'.~ ~"'~.a~S
'"
.0
",N
~
~
,...0
8
~
00
~..U 0"""
-~
;3 "'"
0
.., '" ~
B.OO~~
~
=
, ,- ~ .--0
~ ~"'~
0 0 ~ ~
=:=.=o'+"
~
2:
-'"
...v
" ~ ca
~ 5: ~
Q)~O~ ",
"'(ij~ C
2U(I)
'" 2. -g
~ 'g, g u
...0
0) ~
~...><,-o)
-pov
>
-~ Po co v '+;
~
"'~co~
t; a; ~
~ [l. Q)
~ ~'v -g '8
.-.) .(.0.0.-
--
31
0
0)
IO_~~::
~N-
0
f".(¥)'Ot
(¥)(¥)
'Ot'Ot
0
~
f".
(¥)
~
M(Of".
'OtN..-
~ CO."-. f"..
Of"
NM(¥)
~
f".(¥)0'Ot0
~
~ ~
(O
'Ot..100)
0
(¥)
~ 11).
NN
'Otf".
(¥)
~
0)00)
cocoa
f".'Ot0)1l)
~
Nf".OIOO
~
(¥)
g N r..: 'OtC
o
~
W
.C
I-
N
N
o
O
N
:)
Q)
01l)1l)
NON
>-
0)0)
a~I:::[C;~
f5~
m,..fN~
~
o
,..fc-i
1O00f".,m(¥)
(¥)1l)0)f".'Ot
1l)0MOO)
~c-iN~ri
[C;
N CX)(¥) 'Ot
N
N
1l)0
~
'Ot'Ot
1t)(O
rir..:
N 'Ot
u.
Nf".10
f".,..-10
.--'Ot
a)
5~
g<a"~~
~~.
N 0) 'Ot 10
f".,
..-f".
E ~
E
a)1O(¥)
(/)
a (0- f".. 0)-
~
(¥)Il)N(O(¥)
m
..-'Ot
~Q)
~-
<a"r..:
~
'Ot
°'OtNN
N
>u.
'Ot(Oa)
1l)00N(o
g~<a"~
Oog
:I: IV
,,-C
N
LL
0)C~
'in 0"
r..: ~
(¥)
°r..:,..fri
O
..-'Ot
f".CX)
>-
(O~~,,>
~~
f".
N'OtN..-
~
~.-
f".,(¥)
0)'Ot...
f".,0
0)'Ot1l)
0
a)a)0)
NO)
(¥)
~
o
f".,a)f".N'Ot
NN
10
~
oc-i<a"~,..f~,..f
(0
~
'Ot 00
N'OtOf".,o)
oo
~
~
CO (¥)
.a)0a)0'ft'
OMf".
~ f".,-O.
It)
(0
'Ot(¥)~
a)'Ot
m
ION
1Of".
~- a).
Il)CO
100)
It)
~
N(¥)o)(¥),.p
Oa)ON
Ri ~ (¥).0-
~
ON(¥)Il)(¥)
f".,OO(ON(O
~
co
O. ~. a)-
(¥)I()(O
O(¥)(O
Il)
COMN
I
I
~'>-
e
2:'
'0
0°""
""cC
C
Q) Q) Q»
-
()
C
.-""'
C
rn
0)-
m
«
"0
U)
u.
--"0
C)
'
,5
~c"'C;)"O
olS °
Q)
>
m~,*
Q) cu ~
>-~C"""
Q)
cu C"Q)
"0
cu
C
U)
~
~
0
C -=
-=-
-ro
0-
Q)
N
>
,- ~
-oZNOCU
B)
~
-[t:
C"
Q)
1..
80~§,~
~U,>:Pa.-OS
-o-JC=
Q)~a.
oE ,-S
~
()Q)
CU
cu
c
Q.CU
E~
--'""
C
Q)"OQ)
Q)
C) cu
e"Oc
Q)
c..
~ CO.
moo
Il)m
..-
>
(¥)a)
I()O)
~
CD
-U)
Q)~
OQ)
-'
co
~
>
c=
::).9
Q) C
Q)
cu >
~C
g=
CUo
-=1>- >00
311
ww
"0"0
~
c"""
Q)
Q)Q)
cucu
"0
E
«~:p
ww
E
U)
Air Force InadeQuate Family HousinQ Units Eliminated
in FY2002
Total
Inventory
MAJCOM
Project Type
Units at t
Base
FY2002
FY2002 traditional construction,
improvement,
and
O&M ro"ects to eliminate inade uate units
PACAF
Improve Hsg
Andersen
AMC
Replace Hsg
Andrews
11th WG Improve Hsg
Bolling
11 th WG Replace Hsg
Bolling
AMC
Improve Hsg
Charleston
AMC
Replace Hsg
Dover
ACC
Replace Hsg
Ellsworth
AMC
Improve Hsg
Grand Forks
PACAF
Replace Hsg
Hickam
PACAF
Improve Hsg
Kadena
USAFE
Improve Hsg
Kaiserslautem I Ramstein
USAFE
Replace Hsg
Lajes Field
ACC
Replace Hsg
Langley
ACC
Improve Hsg
Langley
AETC
Replace Hsg
Luke
USAFE
Improve Hsg
RAF Croughton
USAFE
Improve Hsg
RAF Lakenheath/Mildenha.l1
USAFE
Replace Hsg
RAF Lakenheath/Mildenhall
USAFE
Improve Hsg
RAF Molesworth
USAFE
Improve Hsg
Spangdah.lem
AMC
Replace Hsg
Travis
AMC
Improve Hsg
Travis
PACAF
Improve Hsg
Yokota
Privatization projects executed to eliminate
inade uate housin
AFMC
Privatize Hsg
Brooks City Base
AFMC
Privatize Hsg Wright-Patterson
AETC
Privatize Hsg
Lackland
ACC
Privatize Hsg
Dyess
AFMC
Privatize Hsg
Robins
PACAF
Privatize Hsg
Elmendorf
Units demolished/otherwise
from fami
."
US
AF
Oth
er
perman
minus
Leased &
Privatized
Total
Inadequate
Inventory
Total
Inadequate
Addressed
103,883
1,348
1,512
1,008
1,489
2,560
8,162
5,019
468
1,512
785
276
603
1,128
1,490
3,583
3,307
256
226
2,930
112
202
2
136
178
120
78
181
102
108
407
64
4
66
120
158
156
31
119
138
118
49
281
2,863
170
1,379
272
0
666
376
25
Various bases -Adjustments
for O&M "whole house"
projects, demolition, and
adjustments in execution
25
312
~
Air ForceInadeQuate
FamilyHousinQ
UnitsEliminated
in FY2002
Total
Inventory
minus
leased&
MAJCOM
Project Type
Privatized
Total
Total
Inadequate Inadequate
Inventory
Addressed
252
32
56
164
0
=
98,698
59,953
-5,185
-6,070
6,070
NOTES:
1. Bases without
313
Air Force InadeQuate Familv HousinQ Units Eliminated
in FY2003
Total
Inventory
MAJCOM
Project Type
ase
Y2003
FY2003 traditional construction,
improvement,
and
O&M ro"ects to eliminate inade uate units
PACAF
Improve Hsg
Andersen
AMC
Replace Hsg
Andrews
AMC
ReplaceHsg
Dover
ACC
Replace Hsg
Dyess
ACC
Replace Hsg
Ellsworth
AMC
Replace Hsg
Grand Forks
PACAF
Replace Hsg
Hickam
ACC
Replace Hsg
Holloman
PACAF
Improve Hsg
Kadena
USAFE
Replace Hsg
Kaiserslautem I Ramstein
USAFE
Improve Hsg
Kaiserslautern I Ramstein
ACC
Improve Hsg
Langley
AETC
Replace Hsg
Luke
AMC
Replace Hsg
MacDili
AFSPC
Replace Hsg
Malmstrom
ACC
Replace Hsg
Minot
ACC
Replace Hsg
Mountain Home
PACAF
Construct Hsg Osan
AFSPC
Improve Hsg
Peterson
USAFE
Replace Hsg
RAF Lakenheath/Mildenhall
AETC
Replace Hsg
Randolph
ACC
Replace Hsg
Seymour Johnson
AMC
Replace Hsg
Travis
AFA
Replace Hsg
USAF Academy
AFA
Improve Hsg
USAF Academy
AETC
Replace Hsg
Vance
ACC
Replace Hs
Whiteman
minus
Leased &
Privatized
Total
Inadequate
Inventory
98,698
Total
Inadequate
Addressed
,cf%,:1
1,390
2,077
1,548
992
1,008
1,489
2,660
1,440
8,162
5,019
444
1,427
924
808
525
947
1,056
904
3,475
2,900
1,512
874
794
1,406
2,387
1,530
123
493
1,130
1,103
1,689
2,428
1247
156
668
591
1,027
1,540
1,052
0
208
662
802
1,258
1,212
845
2,660
112
105
112
85
22
150
96
101
124
19
376
46
140
96
18
214
95
0
87
96
112
126
110
71
66
59
22
314
Air Force
InadeQuate
Family
Housina
Units
Eliminated
in FY2003
Total
MAJCOM
Privatization
inad.
AFM
Project Type
projects
Base
executed
Total
Inadequate
Inventory
-1
-1
se permanently
1,573
1 573
,
removed
..490
Various bases -Adjustments
for ?&M "whol~ ~ouse"
projects, demolition, and
adjustments in execution
Other
Pr
490
revious FY
AC
75
n
75
De
PA
AFSPC
Total
Inadequate
Addressed
to eliminate
Kirtland
Units
from fami
USAF
Inventory
minus
Leased &
Privatized
0
Construct Hsg
Peterson
Units at end of FY2003
Differe
=
96,872
55,155
-1,826
-4,798
4,798
NOTES:
1. Bases without
ro.ects are not shown.
315
Air Force Inadeauate
Familv Housina
Units Eliminated
in FY2004
Total
Inventory
minus
MAJCOM
Project Type
Units at the beginning
Base
of FY2004
FY2004 traditional construction,
improvement,
and
O&M 'p:!ojects to eliminate inad~uate
units
PACAF
Improve Hsg
Andersen
AMC
Replace Hsg
Andrews
ACC
Replace Hsg
Davis-Monthan
ACC
Replace Hsg
Dyess
AFMC
Replace Hsg
Eglin
ACC
Replace Hsg
Ellsworth
AMC
Replace Hsg
Grand Forks
PACAF
Improve Hsg
Hickam
USAFE
Replace Hsg
Incirlik (Note 2)
PACAF
Improve Hsg
Kadena
USAFE
Improve Hsg
Kaiserslautern I Ramstein
USAFE
Replace Hsg
Lajes Field
AFSPC
Improve Hsg
Los Angeles
AFSPC
Replace Hsg
Malmstrom
ACC
Replace Hsg
Minot
PACAF
.11"~.Misawa
ACC
Replace Hsg
Mountain Home
PACAF
Construct Hsg Osan
USAFE
Replace Hsg
RAF Lakenheath/Mildenhall
AETC
Replace Hsg
Randolph
-'ACC
Replace Hsg
Seymour Johnson
USAFE
Improve Hsg
Spangdahlem (Note 2)
AMC
Replace Hsg
Travis
ACC
Replace Hsg
Whiteman
PACAF
Improve H~g
Yokota
Leased &
Privatized
Total
Inadequate
Inventory
96,872
55,155-
47,016
1,390
1,536
1,256
992
2,359
1,008
1,489
2,660
900
8,162
5,270
468
645
1,406
2,387
2,256
1,492
123
1,130
803
1,583
1,604
2,428
1,129
2,540
27,003
332
995
1,028
723
1,476
818
1,098
1,142
900
5,601
2,784
196
546
884
1,347
292
1,171
0
648
626
1,170
374
1,102
656
1,094
Total
Inadequate
Addressed
2,648
165
50
93
116
0
75
144
190
122
182
42
279
94
200
120
186
89
0
138
0
100
263
316
Air Force InadeQuate Familv Housina
Units Eliminated
in FY2004
Total
Inventory
MAJCOM
Project Type
minus
Leased &
Privatized
Base
Privatization projects executed to eliminate
inade uate housin
Pro ram Year
ACC
Privatize Hsg
Beale
AFSPC
Privatize Hsg
Buckley
AFMC
Privatize Hsg
Hanscom
PACAF
Privatize Hsg
Hickam
AETC
Privatize Hsg
Little Rock
AFSOC
Privatize Hsg
Moody
ACC
Privatize Hsg
Nellis
ACC
Privatize Hsg
Offutt
AFSPC
Privatize Hsg
Patrick
its demolished/otherwise
m fami
..-1,07
USAF
USAFE
Other
Demolish
permanently
Total
Inadequate
Inventory
-10,051
-1,444
0
-687
-1,356
-1,535
-300
-1,313
-2,456
-960
Total
Inadequate
Addressed
8,623
1,246
0
575
1356
1201
78
900
2,307
960
removed
1,076
Various bases -Adjustments
for ?&M "whol~ ~ouse"
projects, demolition, and
adjustments in execution
-1,07
1,076
Ramstein
-1,07
1,076
0
0
11
11
ni
=
0
84,942
48,682
-11,930
-6,473
12,347
NOTES:
1. Bases without
ro.ects are not shown.
317
Air Force InadeQuate Familv Housina
Units Eliminated
in FY2005
Total
Inventory
MAJCOM
Units at t
Project Type
Base
Y2005
FY2005 traditional construction,
improvement,
and
O&M ro.ects to eliminate inade uate units Note 1
AMC
Improve Hsg
Andrews
ACC
Improve Hsg
Barksdale
PACAF
Improve Hsg
Kadena
USAFE
Replace Hsg
Kaiserslautem I Ramstein
AMC
Replace Hsg
MacDill
AFSPC
Replace Hsg
Malmstrom
ACC
Replace Hsg
Minot
ACC
Replace Hsg
Mountain Home
PACAF
Construct Hsg Osan
USAFE
Replace Hsg
RAF Lakenheath/Mildenhall
ACC
Replace Hsg
Seymour Johnson
ACC
Replace Hsg
Whiteman
PACAF
Improve Hsg
Yokota
Privatization projects executed to eliminate
inade uate housin
Note 2
AETC
Privatize Hsg Altus
ACC
Privatize Hsg
Barksdale
ACC
Privatize Hsg
Cannon
AETC
Privatize Hsg
Columbus
ACC
Privatize Hsg
Davis-Monthan
AMC
Privatize Hsg
Dover
AFMC
Privatize Hsg
Eglin
PACAF
Privatize Hsg
Elmendorf II
AMC
Privatize Hsg
Fairchild
AFPSC
Privatize Hsg
FE Warren
AETC
Privatize Hsg
Goodfellow
AFMC
Privatize Hsg
Hill
ACC
Privatize Hsg
Holloman
AFSOC
Privatize Hsg
Hurlburt
AETC
Privatize Hsg
Keesler
AETC
Privatize Hsg
Lackland
ACC
PrivatizeHsg
Langley
AETC
Privatize Hsg
Laughlin
ACC
Privatize Hsg
Luke
AETC
Privatize Hsg
Maxwell
AMC
Privatize Hsg
McChord
AMC
Privatize Hsg
McGuire
AETC
Privatize Hsg
Randolph
AFMC
Privatize Hsg
Robins II
ACC
Privatize Hsg
Shaw
AMC
Privatize Hsg
Scott
AETC
Privatize Hs
Sheppard
minus
Leased &
Privatized
Total
Inadequate
Inventory
Total
Inadequate
Addressed
84,942
1,536
729
8,162
4,194
743
1,413
2,095
1,492
235
1,137
1,583
1,085
2,540
945
426
5,479
1,526
503
898
1,285
978
0
544
1,061
540
1,006
2,059
239
132
144
61
115
142
147
154
167
160
88
22,397
406
426
712
545
935
1,262
1197
434
776
265
96
703
803
69
1,568
564
1,112
58
528
361
498
1,420
710
634
1,704
420
626
318
.,
Air Force InadeQuate Familv Housina
Units Eliminated
in FY2005
Total
Inventory
minus
Leased &
Privatized
MAJCOM
Project Type
Base
AFMC
AMC
AETC
AFSPC
AFMC
Privatize
Privatize
Privatize
Privatize
Privatize
Tinker
Travis
Tyndall
Vandenburg
Wright-Patterson
Hsg
Hsg
Hsg
Hsg
Hsg
II
Total
Inadequate
Inventory
Total
Inadequate
Addressed
-730
-2,428
-934
-1969
-518
337
1,046
546
1340
296
-1,079
681
anently removed
revious
FY
Deficit Construction
ro"ects
PACAF
Construct Hsg Osan
Units at end of FY200S
Different from Beginnin
=
0
0
117
117
0
0
47,640
-37,302
23,545
-25,137
2S,137
NOTES:
1. Bases without pro.ects are not shown.
2. Privatization assumes Congressional relief from the
Famil Housin Investment Fund (FHIF ca .
~
.319
,
Air Force InadeQuate Family HousinQ Units Eliminated
in FY2006
Total
MAJCOM
Units at t
Project Type
Base
FY200
FY2006 traditional construction,
improvement,
and
O&M ro"ects to eliminate inade uate units Note 1
AMC
Improve Hsg
Andrews
AFMC
Improve Hsg
Amold
11th WG Replace Hsg
Bolling
11th WG Improve Hsg
Bolling
AMC
Replace Hsg
Charleston
ACC
Replace Hsg
Dyess
AFMC
Replace Hsg
Edwards
PACAF
Replace Hsg
Eielson
ACC
Replace Hsg
Ellsworth
AMC
Replace Hsg
Grand Forks
USAFE
Replace Hsg
Incirlik
USAFE
Improve Hsg
Incirlik
PACAF
Improve Hsg
Kadena
USAFE
Replace Hsg
Kaiserslautern I Ramstein
USAFE
Improve Hsg
Kaiserslautem I Ramstein
USAFE
Improve Hsg
Lajes Field
AFSPC
Improve Hsg
Los Angeles
AMC
Replace Hsg
MacDili
AMC
Improve Hsg
MacDili
AFSPC
Replace Hsg
Malmstrom
ACC
Replace Hsg
Minot
PACAF
Improve Hsg
Misawa
USAFE
Improve Hsg
Moron
ACC
Replace Hsg
Mountain Home
ACC
Improve Hsg
Mountain Home
AFSPC
Privatize Hsg
Peterson
AMC
Improve Hsg
Pope
USAFE
Replace Hsg
RAF Lakenheath/Mildenhall
USAFE
Improve Hsg
RAF Lakenheath/Mildenhall
ACC
Replace Hsg
Seymour Johnson
USAFE
Improve Hsg
Spangdahlem
AFA
Privatize Hsg
USAF Academy
ACC
Replace Hsg
Whiteman
PACAF
Improve Hsg
Yokota
Privatization
projects executed to eliminate
inade uate housin
Note 2
AFSPC
Privatize Hsg
FE Warren
PACAF
Privatize Hsg
Hickam
AFSPC
Privatize Hsg
Peterson
USAFA
Privatize Hsg
USAFA
AETC
Privatize Hsg
Goodfellow (Note 3)
Inventory
minus
Total
Total
Leased&
Inadequate
Inadequate
Privatized
Inventory
Addressed
47,640
,
4,685
178
40
159
24
10
190
226
92
60
300
100
235
570
101
16
150
188
109
5
296
223
281
34
194
12
0
138
107
10
255
79
0
111
192
2,772
356
1,236
360
820
0
320
Air Force InadeQuate
Familv Housina
Units Eliminated
in FY2006
Total
Inventory
minus
Leased &
MAJCOM
Project Type
Units demolished/otherwise
fro
Base
permanently
Privatized
Total
Total
Inadequate Inadequate
Inventory
Addressed
removed
1,57
1,576
Pr
0
De
30
PA
30
Un
42,489
14,509
-5 I 151
-9036
I
=
0
9,033
NOTES:
1. Bases without projects are not shown.
2. Assumes Congressional relief from the Family Housing
Investment Fund (FHIF) cap.
3. Goodfellow is
rivatization deficit construction
321.
Air Force InadeQuateFamilvHousinQUnits Eliminated in FY2007
"-'
MAJCOM
Units at t
Project Type
Base
FY2007 traditional construction,
eliminate inade uate units
Total
Inventory
minus
Total
Total
Leased &
Inadequate
Inadequate
Privatized
FY2007
42,489
improvement,
and O&M projects
I
Inventory
Addressed
14,509.§I,cc:\1\,%!;;i\,
to
5,047
322
11111111111
1
"~'i-:..
""..,",~3i
;;,
;;;i
Air Force InadeQuate Familv Housing
Units Eliminated
in FY2007
Total
Inventory
MAJCOM
Project Type
minus
Leased &
Privatized
Base
Total
Inadequate
Inventory
Total
Inadequate
Addressed
0
2,745
0
0
=
37,843
6,717
-4,646
-7,792
7,792
NOTES:
1. Bases without
.,
" r-"
323
Air Force InadeQuate Familv HousinQ Units Eliminated
in FY2008
Total
Inventory
minus
Leased &
MAJCOM
Project Type
Base
Units at the beginni"-9-of FY200S
FY200Straditional construction, improvement, and
O&M.E!°jects to eliminate inadequate units
Privatized
37,S43
Total
Inadequate
Inventory
Total
Inadequate
Addressed
6,717.
2,213
324
Air Force Inadequate
Familv Housing
Units Eliminated
in FY2008
Total
Inventory
minus
leased&
MAJCOM
Project Type
Privatized
Total
Total
Inadequate Inadequate
Inventory
Addressed
0
-30
250
0
0
37,591
-252
",325
4,254
-2,463
2,463
Air Force Inadeauate
Family Housina
Units Eliminated
in FY2009
Total
MAJCOM
Project Type
Inventory
minus
Leased &
Privatized
Base
Units at t
Y2009
Units
fro'
projects
.0
execu e
Total
Inadequate
Addressed
37,591
FY2009 traditional construction,
improvement,
O&M ro'ects to eliminate inade uate units
Privatization
inad
Total
Inadequate
Inventory
and
4,254
0 eliminate
se permanently
removed
..0
Pro
ious FY
0
Def
0
Units at end of FY2009
37,591
=
nt
0
0
4,254
-4,254
2,911
326
Air Force InadeQuate Family Housina
Units Eliminated
in FY2010
Total
Inventory
MAJCOM Project Type
Base
Unitsatt
FY2010
minus
Total
Total
Leased &
Privatized
Inadequate
Inventory
Inadequate
Addressed
37,591
FY2010 traditional construction, improvement, and
O&M ro"ects to eliminate inade uate units
Privatization projects ex
inade
Units
fro.
484
eliminate
.0
emo IS
0
..-0
se permanently removed
Pro
0
Def
1
Uni
37,645
=
0
54
0
484
0
Not
1.
327
Air Force Inadeauate
Familv Housina
Units Eliminated
in FY2011
Total
Illventory
MAJCOM
minus
Leased &
Privatized
Project Type
Uni
FY2011 traditional construction,
improvement,
O&M ro"ects to eliminate inade uate units
Total
Inadequate
Inventory
Total
Inadequate
Addressed
37,645
and
548
Pri
ina
0
Uni
fro
0
Pro
0
Def
0
Uni
37,747
102
0
548
0
Note:
1. Kadena & Yokota units will become inade
...,328
.
..~
I
INDEX
,,~..:;
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMIL Y HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
INDEX
SUBJECT
.PAGE
FAMILY HOUSING NARRATIVE
307
INDEX
329
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
333
LEGISLATIVE LANGUAGE
Authorization
335
Appropriation
337
NEW CONSTRUCnON
New/Current Mission Activities
339
Construction Purposeand Scope
341
Eielson AFB, AK
Eielson AFB, AK
Edwards AFB, CA
Bolling AFB, DC
MacDil1 AFB, FL
Mountain Home AFB, ill
Whiteman AFB, MO
Malmstrom AFB, MT
Seymour JohnsonAFB, NC
Grand Forks AFB, ND
Minot AFB, ND
Charleston AFB, SC
Ellsworth AFB, SD
Dyess AFB, TX
Ramstein AB, Germany
SpangdahlemAB, Germany
Incirlik AB Adana, Turkey
RAP Lakenheath, UK
February2005
343
347
.348
352
356
360
364
368
372
376
380
384
388
392
397
401
405
409
PageNo.
;,.
"'~;;
r,cil. I
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMIL Y HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
INDEX
SUBJECT
PAGE
POST ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION
Purposeand Scope
California
Colorado
District of Columbia
Florida
Idaho
Kansas
Maryland
North Carolina
Tennessee
Wyoming
413
416
416
417
417
417
418
418
419
419
419
Overseas
Germany
Japan
Portugal
Spain
Turkey
United Kingdom
420
420
421
421
422
.422
Post Acquisition Over $50,000 per Unit
Fort MacArthur Family Housing Annex, CA
USAF Academy, CO
PetersonAFB, CO
Bolling AFB, DC
MacDil1 AFB, FL
Mountain Home AFB, ill
McConnell AFB, KS
Andrews AFB, MD
Pope AFB, NC
ArnoldAFB , TN
Francis E. Warren AFB, WY
February 2005
425
427
429
431
433
435
437
439
441
443
445
PageNo.
'"
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
INDEX
SUBJECT
PAGE
Overseas
Rarnstein AB, Gennany
Kadena AB, Japan
Misawa AB, Japan
Yokota AB, Japan
Lajes Field, Portugal
Moron AB, Spain
Incirlik AB Adana, Turkey
RAF Mi1denhall, UK
447
449
451
453
455
457
459
461
ADVANCE PLANNING AND DESIGN
463
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SUMMARY
Narrative (purpose and Scope)
Operations & MaintenanceReprogramming Actions (FY04)
Inventory and Funding Summary FH-2
Historic Housing FH-6
465
468
469
473
OPERATIONS
Management OP-5
Services OP-5
Furnishings OP-5
Miscellaneous OP-5
475
476
478
480
482
UTILITIES OP-5
485
MAINTENANCE
OP-5
487
MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OVER $20,000 PER UNIT
491
GFOQ O&M COSTS
493
REIMBURSABLE PROGRAM OP-5
495
February 2005
PageNo.
.,
"',.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
INDEX
SUBJECT
LEASING
PAGE
Purposeand Scope
OP-5
Exhibit FH-4, Leasing (Other than Section801 & 802)
Exhibit FH-4A, High Cost Foreign LeasedUnits
Exhibit FH-4B, Section801 Leases
497
499
501
502
503
HOUSING PRIVATIZATION
Overview
505
OP-5
508
Executive Summary
Housing Privatization Initiative
509
511
DEBT PAYMENT
517
PB-18 EXHIBIT, Foreign CurrencyExchange Data
519
February 2005
PageNo.
SUMMARY
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
FY 2006 FINANCIAL SUMMARY
AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRlAnON REQUESTEDFOR FY 2006:
FUNDING PROGRAMFY 2006
(iQQQl
Construction
$790,501
Post-AcquisitionConstruction
420,203
Advance Planning and Design
40,404
ApproDriationReQuest:Construction
1,251,I 08
Operations,Utilities and Maintenance
575,594
Operating Expenses
Utilities
148,169
116,946
Maintenance
310,479
Housing Privatization
36,437
Leasing-Worldwide
154,907
Debt Payment
Premiumsfor Servicemen's
MortgageInsuranceCoverage
1
AppropriationReQuest:O&M. Leasing.
HousinQPrivatizationand Debt Pavrnent
766,939
ApproDriationReguest
2,018,047
ReimbursementProgram
11,782
FY 2006 FAMILY HOUSING PROGRAM
$2,029,829
February2005
PageNo.3
---
33
This Page Intentionally
Left Blank
~~ic':
334
LEGISLATIVE
LANGUAGE
DEPARTMENT OF llIE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMll.. Y HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
EY 2006 Authorization Langyage
SEC. 2302. FAMJL Y HOUSING
(a)
CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION. -Using amounts appropriated pursuant
to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a)(5)(A)), the Secretary of the Air Force
may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition) at the installations, for
the purposes, and in the amounts set forth in the following table:
STATE
INSTALLATION
Alaska
Eielson AFB
92 Units
$37,650,000
Alaska
Eielson AFB
300 Units
$18,144,000
California
Edwards AFB
226 Units
$59,699,000
District of Columbia Bolling AFB
159 Units
$48,711,000
Florida
MacDill AFB
109 Units
$40,982,000
Idaho
Mt. Home AFB
194 Units
$56,467,000
Missouri
Whiteman AFB
111 Units
$26,917,000
Montana
MalmstromAFB
296 Units
$68,971,000
North Carolina
Seymour JohnsonAFB
255 Units
$48,868,000
North Dakota
Grand Forks AFB
300 Units
$86,706,000
North Dakota
Minot AFB
223 Units
$44,548,000
South Carolina
Charleston AFB
10 Units
$15,935,000
South Dakota
Ellsworth AFB
60 Units
$14,383,000
Texas
Dyess AFB
190 Units
$43,016,000
Germany
Ramstein AB
101 Units
$62,952,000
February 2005
PURPOSE
AMOUNT
PageNo':
---
335
DEPARTMENT OF11-IEAIR FORCE
MILITARY F~
Y HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
STATE
INSTALLATION
PURPOSE
AMOUNT
Germany
Spangdahlem
AB
79 Units
$45,385,000
Turkey
Incirlik AB
100Units
$22,730,000
UK
RAP Lakenheath
107 Units
$48,437,000
Total
$790,501,000
.
(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN. -Using amountsappropriatedpursuantto the
authorizationof appropriationsin section2304(a)(5)(A),the Secretaryof the Air
Forcemaycarry out architecturaland engineeringservicesand constructiondesign
activities with respectto the constructionor improvementof military family housing
units in an amountnot to exceed$40,404,000.
SEC.2303. IMPROVEMENTTO MILITARY F~
Y HOUSINGUNITS
Subjectto section2825of Title 10,United StatesCode,andusingamountsappropriated
pursuantto the authorizationof appropriationsin section2304(a)(5)(A),the Secretaryof the Air
Force mayimproveexisting military family housingunits in an amountnot to exceed
$420,203,000.
SEC.2304. AUTHORIZATION OFAPPROPRIATIONS,AIR FORCE
(a) IN GENERAL
(5) for Military FamilyHousingfunctions(A) For constructionand acquisition,planning
and design,and improvementof military family
housingandfacilities, $1,251,108,000.
(B) For supportof military family housing
(includingfunctionsdescribedin section2833
of Title 10,United StatesCode),$766,939,000.
February2005
PageNo.
336
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
FY 2006 AoQrooriationLangyage
Family HousingConstruction,Air Force
For expensesof family housingfor the Air Forcefor construction,including acquisition,
replacement,addition, expansion,extensionand alteration,asauthorizedby law,
$1,251,108,000,to remainavailableuntil September30, 2010.
Family Housing OperationandMaintenance,Air Force
For expensesof family housingfor the Air Force for operationand maintenance,
including debtpayment,leasing,minor construction,principal and interestcharges,and
insurancepremiums,as authorizedby law, $766,939,000.
February2005
PageNo.
:3 3 7
This Page Intentionally
Left Blank
338
NEW CONSTRUCTION
~-
DEPARTMENT OF mE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMll. Y HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
FY 2006 NEW/CURRENT MISSION ACTIVITIES
In compliance with the SenateAppropriations Committee Report (100-380) on the FY 1989
Military Construction Appropriation Act, the Air Force has included the following exhibit that
displays construction projects requested in two separatecategories: new mission and current
mission. "New Mission" projects are projects that support deployment and beddown of new weapon
systems, new program initiatives, and major mission expansions. "Current Mission" projects are
projects that either replace inadequate existing facilities or construct new facilities which are not
available to meet current requirements.
NUMBER OF
UNITS
REQUESTED
AUTHORIZATION
AMO:u;MI ($000)
LOCATION
MISSION
ACQUISITION HOUSING
Eielson AFB, AK
Current
300
$18,144
REPLACE:MENT HOUSING
Eielson AFB, AK
Edwards AFB, CA
BollingAFB,DC
MacDi11 AFB, FL
Mt Home AFB, ill
Whiteman AFB, MO
Malmstrom AFB, MT
Seymour JohnsonAFB, NC
Grand Forks AFB, ND
Minot AFB, ND
Charleston AFB, SC
Ellsworth AFB' SD
Dyess AFB, TX
Ramstein AB, Germany
SpangdahlemAB, Germany
Incirlik AB, Turkey
RAF Lakenheath, UK
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
92
226
159
109
194
111
296
255
300
223
10
60
190
101
79
100
107
$37,650
$59,699
$48,711
$40,982
$56,467
$26,917
$68,971
$48,868
$86,706
$44,548
$15,935
$14,383
$43,016
$62,952
$45,385
$22,730
$48,437
February 2005
I
Page No.
339
DEPART1\.1ENTOF mE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMll. Y HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
REQUESTED
AUTHORIZATION
SUMMARY:
NEW MISSION TOTAL
AMOUNT ($OOO)
$0
CURRENT MISSION TOTAL
$790,501
IMPROVEMENTS
$420,203
PLANNING AND DESIGN
GRAND TOTAL
February 2005
$40.404
$1,251,108
Page No. -.'340
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
Mll.IT AR Y FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
FY 2006 NEW CONSTRUCTION
Program(In Thousands)
FY 2006 Program $790,501
FY 2005 Program $570,340
Purposeand ScoQe
This program provides for the construction of new homes where the local community cannot
provide adequatehousing and replacement of existing homes, where improvements for Air Force
personnel are not economically feasible, and support facilities where existing facilities are
inadequate. Costs reflect all amounts necessaryto provide complete and usable facilities.
ProgramSummary
Authorization is requestedfor: replacement of2,612 units and acquisition of300 units.
A summary of the funding program for FY 2006 is as follows:
AU11IORIZA TION
Number of
TVDe/Locations
Mission
ACQUISmON HOUSING
Eielson AFB, AK
Current
300
$18,144
REPLACEMENT HOUSING
Eielson AFB, AK
Edwards AFB, CA
Bolling AFB, DC
MacDil1 AFB, FL
Mt Home AFB, ID
Whiteman AFB, MO
Malmstrom AFB, MT
Seymour Johnson AFB, NC
Grand Forks AFB, ND
Minot AFB, ND
Charleston AFB, SC
Ellsworth AFB, SD
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
92
226
159
109
194
111
296
255
300
223
10
') 60
$37,650
$59,699
$48,711
$40,982
$56,467
$26,917
$68,971
$48,868
$86,706
$44,548
$15,935
$14,383
Dyess AFB, TX
Ramstein AB, Germany
SpangdahlemAB, Germany
Incirlik AB, Turkey
Current
Current
Current
Current
190
101
79
100
$43,016
$62,952
$45,385
$22,730
February 2005
~
Requested
Amount ($000)
PageNo.
.
341
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
AUTHORIZATION
Number of
Type/Locations
Mission
RAF Lakenheath, UK
Current
NEW MISSION TOTAL
~
107
1
Requested
Amount($000)
$48,437
$0
CURRENT MISSION TOTAL
$790,501
IMPROVEMENTS
$420,203
PLANNING AND DESIGN
GRAND TOTAL
February 2005
$40.404
$1,251,108
PageNo.
342
1. COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
INSTALLATION AND lOCATION
COMMAND
5. AREA CONST
EIElSON AIR FORCE BASE
PACIFIC COMMAND
COST INDEX
ALASKA
2.04
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
Strength
OFF
ENl
CIV
OFF ENl
CIV
AS OF 30 SEP 04
425
3845
945
0
0
0
END FY 2009
414
3715
773
0
0
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
19,940
Inventory Total as of: (30 Sep 04)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2007)
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
OFF
1
1
ENL
1
1
CIV
0
0
3,244,655
41,000
55,794
0
10,381
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
~
PROJECT TITLE
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing
711-142
Purchase Build/lease
272865
3,624,695
(FY 2006)
SCOPE
92 UN
300 UN
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
None
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
711-142
Construct Military Family Housing
TOTAL
5,217
4,904
COST DESIGN
$,000
START
37,650 Aug-04
18,144
STATUS
CMPl
May-05
(FY 2007)
(FY08-11)
18 UN
10,381
9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
1,102
10. The host fighter wing supports an F-16 squadron, an A/OA-10 squadron, and a training squadron which
conducts COPE THUNDER exercises. The installation also hosts an Air National Guard air refueling squadron
(KC-135) and a training group which conducts arctic survival training.
DD Form 1390, 24 Jul 00
.,..,
-.'
." c
~
:,.,
43
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2 DATE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA.
3. INSTALlATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
EIELSONAIR FORCE BASE,ALASKA
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
REPLACEFAMILY HOUSING
6. CATEGORY CODE
88741
7. PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
9. COST ESTIMATE
U/M
QUANTITY
ITEM
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
FT W044804C
Military Family Housing
Dwellings
Other SpecialConstruction
SupportCosts:
Landscaping
Utility Mains
Recreation
Demolition
Environmental
OtherSite Work
UN
UN
$37,650
UNIT COST
92
92
COST $000
30,939
( 30,865 )
(74)
2,730
( 497 )
( 392 )
(392 )
( 497 )
( 262 )
(690)
335,489
804
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
Subtotal
Contingency (5%)
Total ContractCost
SIOH (6.5%)
33,669
1,683
35,352
2,297
ProjectCost
37,650
Area CostFactor 2.04
10. Descriptionof ProposedConstruction:Demolish92 and construct92 Military FamilyHousing (MFH)
units with all necessaryamenitiesandsupportingfacilities. Projectincludessite preparation,garages,air
conditioning,energyconservingfeatures,parking,patios,privacy fencing,and supportinfrastructureof roads,
utilities, recreationareas,landscaping,
asbestos
removal,and demolition.
Programmed
Paygrades
E4-E6
E4-E6
Bedrooms ~
3
4
1,610
1,870
~
2,002
2,322
Project
~
tl.cJ;Qr
186
216
2.122
2.122
Cost Per
~
784
784
Totals:
Maximum size: E4-E6 3 Bedroom
Maximum size: E4-E6 4 Bedroom
11. REQUIREMENT: 1812 UN
No
~
($000)
IQ.tg.!
44
48
13,615
17,250
92
30,865
1720 NSF /2132 GSF /199 GSM
2090 NSF /2592 GSF /241 GSM
ADEQUATE: 1181 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 631 UN
PROJECT:ReplaceFamilyHousing
REQUIREMENT: Projectis requiredto provide modemand efficienthousingfor military membersand their
dependentsat EielsonAFB. All unitswill meetmodemhousingstandardsand areprogrammedin accordance
with the Housing CommunityProfile (HCP).The designwill providea modemkitchen,living room,
bedroom,and bath configuration,with ampleinterior and exteriorstorage.The numberof bedroomswill range
from threeto four, asidentifiedin the mostrecentHousingRequirementsand Market Analysis(HRMA). Units
will be provided with garagesand exteriorparking.Adequateinfrastructuresupportfor utilities shall alsobe
provided.The HCP andHRMA are elementsof the GeneralPlan for EielsonAFB andarethebasis for this .
project.
CURRENTSITUATION: The existin housin unitswereconstructedbetween1962and 1964.The show
DDFORM1391,DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNnLEXHAUSTED
344
~c;~;~~~
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
2. DATE
3. INSTALLATION
ANDLOCATION
4. PROJECT
TITLE
EIELSONAIR FORCEBASE, ALASKA
REPLACEFAMILY HOUSING
5. PROGRAM
ELEMENT
6.CATEGORY
CODE
7. PROJECT
NUMBER
8. PROJECT
COST
($000)
88741
711-142
FT W044804C
$37,650
the effectsof ageand heavyuse. Theyhavehad no majorupgradessinceconstruction,and they do not meetthe
needsof today'sfamilies,nor do theyprovide a modemhomeenvironment.The roof, walls, and foundations
areantiquatedanddo not meetcurrentstandardsfor efficiencyandsafety.Interiorsare generallyinadequateby
modemcriteria. Bathroomsare smalland lack adequateclosetspace.Kitchenshave insufficient cabinets.
IMP ACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Units will continueto deterioraterapidly, resultingin increasingoperations,
maintenanceand repairto the governmentand inconvenienceto residents.Without this project, repair of these
units will continuein a costly piecemealfasionwith little or on improvementin living quality.
ADDITIONAL: This project meetsthe criteria/scopespecifiedin the Air ForceFamily HousingGuide. An
economicanalysishasbeenpreparedcomparingthe alternativesof new construction,improvement,leasing,and
statusquo operations.Basedon the net presentvaluesand benefitsof respectivealternatives,new construction
was found to be the most costeffectivealternativeoverthe life of theproject.The costof improving the
existing unitsis 75% of the cost of replacingtheseunits. Sincethis is replacementhousing,there will be no
increasein studentpopulationandthereforeno impacton the local schooldistrict. The constructionagentfor
this projectis the Army Corpsof Engineers,resulting in a SIOHrateof6.5%. Base Civil Engineer:Lt Col
Alan J. Wieder,(907)377-5213.
DOFORM1391C,DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
345
!!:c
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION
3. DOD COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
1. DATE OF REPORT
July-04
2. FISCAL YEAR
2006
4. REPORTING INSTALLATION
a. NAME
5. DATA AS OF
REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL
DD-A&L(AR)1716
b. LOCATION
EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE
ALASKA
Nov-04
ANALYSIS
CURRENT
OF
OFFICER
REQUIREMENTS
6. TOTAL PERSONNEL
7. PERMANENT
AND ASSETS
(a)
PROJECTED
E9-E7
(b)
E6-E1
(c)
TOTAL
(d)
OFFICER
(e)
E9-E7
E6-E1
(f)
(g)
TOTAL
STRENGTH
256
250
2,544
256
250
2,544
0
0
0
0
0
92
0
13
0
3,050
256
250
2,551
256
250
2,551
PARTY PERSONNEL
8. GROSS FAMILY HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
9. TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY
HOUSED
(a+b+c)
a. INVOLUNTARILYSEPARATED
b. IN MILITARYHOUSINGTO BE
DISPOSED/REPLACED
C. UNACCEPTABLYHOUSEDIN COMMUNITY
10. VOLUNTARY
11. EFFECnVE
SEPARAnONS
HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
12. HOUSING ASSETS
(a + b)
a. UNDER MILITARYCONTROL
(1) HOUSEDIN EXISTINGDOD
OWNED/CONTROLLED
(2) UNDERCONTRACT/APPRDVED
(3) VACANT
(4) INACTIVE
b. PRIVATEHOUSING
(1) ACCEPTABLYHOUSED
(2) ACCEPTABLEVACANTRENTAL
13. EFFECTIVE HOUSING DEFICIT
14. PROPOSED PROJECT
0
92
15. REMARKS
DO FORM 1513. NOV N
3.46
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
4.
PROJECT TITLE
PURCHASE 801 HOUSING UNITS
CATEGORYCODE
88741
DATE
generated)
EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, ALASKA
5.
2.
7.
PROJECT NUMBER
711-221
9
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
FTQW044803
18,144
COST
UNIT
ITEM
COST
U/M:..Q.UANTITY
PRIMARYFACILITIES
18,144
FAMHSG LEASED
UN
300
60,480
( 18,144 )
SUPPORTINGFACILITIES
0
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
18,144
CONTRACT
COST
18,144
TOTAL REQUEST
AREA
COST
18,144
FACTOR
2 .04
10.
Description
of Proposed Construction:
Implement
the
accordance
with contract
F65501-86-LOO02,
of 06 Aug 1986,
"Section
801 Housing"
MFH units
from Fischer
Enterprises.
11.
REQUIREMENT:
PROJECT:
Purchase
REQUIREMENT:
1,494UN
ADEQUATE: 479UN
300 Sprucewood
Discontinue
buyout
cost option
for 300 Sprucewood
the
Homes
annual
lease
"Section
801 Housing"
payments
in
Homes
SUBSTANDARD: 331UN
units.
by purchasing
(Current
Mission)
300 units.
CURRENT SITUATION:
Under lease agreements
with Polar
Star,
the Air Force has been
leasing
these 300 MFH units
since they were built
in 1986.
These units
consist
of 150
2-bedroom
JNCO units
and 150 3-bedroom JNCO units.
The Air Force is currently
paying
$3.8 million
per year for all
300 units
until
the lease expires
in August 2006.
Once
expired,
the option
exists
to purchase
the units
instead
entering
into
another
lease
agreement.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The Air Force will
renegotiated
prior
to August 2006.
continue
to pay
an annual
fee
that
must
be
ADDITIONAL:
An economic analysis
has been prepared
comparing
the alternatives
of the
buyout
cost option
and continuing
the lease payment.
Based on the net present
values
and benefits
of the respective
alternatives,
the buyout
cost option
was found to be the
most cost effective
over the life
of the project.
Base Civil
Engineer:
Lt Col Alan
Wieder,
(907) 377-5213.
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 99
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
Page No.
341
1. COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
COMMAND
5. AREA CONST
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE
AIR FORCE MATERIAL
COST INDEX
CALIFORNIA
COMMAND
1.28
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
Strength
OFF
ENL
CIV
OFF ENL
CIV
OFF
ENL
CIV
ASOF30SEP04
818
2477 5129
0
0
0
29
20
112
END FY2009
786
2333 5141
0
0
0
29
20
112
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
300,911
Inventory Total as of: (30 Sep 04)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2007)
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
TOTAL
8,585
8,421
3,571,891
40,873
59,699
61,758
1,841
39840
3,775,902
(FY 2006)
COST DESIGN
~
PROJECTTITLE
SCOPE
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing
226 UN
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing
174 UN
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
711-142
Replace Hsg Maint & Supp/Stor Fac
LS
$.000
59,699
START
Aug-04
STATUS
CMPL
May-05
(FY 2007)
61,758
(FY08-11)
1,841
9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
897
10. Air Force Flight Test Center which is responsible for flight test activities for all USAF aircraft and related
avionics, flight control, and weapons systems; a test wing; an air base wing; Air Force Test Pilot School; the
Propulsion Directorate of the Air Force Research Laboratory; a space surveillance squadron; and a landing site
for the space shuttle.
DD Form 1390, 24 Jul 00
.348
I
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
1REPLACE FAMILY
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
DATE
4. PROJECT TITLE
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA
1
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
1 2.
PROJECT DATA
J7. PROJECT NUMBER
6. CATEGORY CODE
88741
711-142
FSPM064501
9. COST ESTIMATE
U/M
QUANTITY
ITEM
Military Family Housing
Dwellings
Support Costs:
Site Improvements
UN
226
HOUSING
l
B. PROJECT COST ($000)
$59,699
UNIT COST
COST~OOO)
31,410
(31,410)
22,482
( 1,961 )
138,982
LS
Landscaping
Utility Mains
Streets
Recreation
Demolition
Environmental
Other Site Work
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
1,636 )
5,325 )
2,352 )
1,200 )
5,253 )
3,330 )
1,425 )
Subtotal
53,892
Contingency (5%)
Total Contract Cost
SIGH (5.5%)
2,694
56,586
3,112
Project Cost
59,699
Area Cost Factor (1.2~
10. Description of Proposed Construction: Replace and demolish 226 housing units in Area F and Area A,
JNCO/SNCO housing units with all necessaryamenities and supporting facilities. Project includes site
preparation, attached two car garages,air conditioning, energy conserving features, parking, exterior patios and
privacy walls, support infrastructure of roads, utilities, recreation areas, landscaping, asbestosremoval, and
demolition. Surplus demo of 107 units (20 Area C JNCO 2/3/4 br, 87 Area F JNCO 3/4 br units). Other site
work includes parking lots, pedestrian walks, and boundary fencing in housing area.
Programmed
Pa~arades
Bedrooms
E1-E3
E1-E3
E7-E8
E7-E8
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
2M
4
3
4
size:
size:
size:
size:
E1-E3 2M Bedroom
E1-E3 4 Bedroom
E7-E8 3 Bedroom
E7-E8 4 Bedroom
11. REQUIREMENT: 2023 UN
~
~
1,180
1,570
1,500
1,730
1,480
1,950
1,860
2,150
1300
1790
1650
2020
NSF
NSF
NSF
NSF
/1630
/2220
/2050
/2500
ADEQUATE: 1623 UN
Project
Q.sM
~
137
181
173
200
GSF
GSF
GSF
GSF
1.19
1.19
1.19
1.19
/151
/206
/190
/232
Cost Per
Q.sM
No
~
($OOO)
IQ1el
773
773
773
773
166
20
8
32
20,920
3,330
1,273
5,887
Totals:
226
31,410
GSM
GSM
GSM
GSM
SUBSTANDARD: 400 UN
PROJECT: Replace and demolish 226 housing units in Area F and Area A, JNCO/SNCO housing units.
Construct a total of 186 units ( 166 duplex JNCO 2BR units, 20 single family JNCO 4 BR units) in Area F,
and Construct a total of 40 sin.E1efami!:¥-units (8 SNCO 3 BR and 32 SNCO 4 BR unitsl in Area A. Surplus
DDFORM1391,DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNllL EXHAUSTED
,349
,
--
1 COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
I
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
20 DATE
14. PROJECT TITLE
EDWARDS AIR FORCEBASE,CALIFORNIA
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
1
1
6. CATEGORY CODE
1
REPLACEFAMILY HOUSING
7. PROJECT NUMBER
1
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
88741
711-142
FSPM064501
$59,699
demoof 107units (20 Area C JNCO 2/3/4br, 87Area F JNCO 3/4br).
REOUIREMENT: Projectis requiredto provide modernand efficienthousingfor military membersand their
dependentsat EdwardsAFB. All units will meetmodernhousingstandardsandareprogrammedin accordance
with the Housing CommunityProfile. The designwill provide a modernkitchen,living room, family room,
bedroom,and bath configuration,with ample interior and exteriorstorage.The numberof bedroomswill range
from two to four, asidentified in the most recentHousingRequirements
and MarketAnalysis. Units will be
provided with a two car garageand exteriorparking for a visitor'svehicle.Adequateinfrastructuresupportfor
roadsandutilities shallalsobe provided.This is the secondphaseof a multiphaseinitiative to replacean
additional226 housingunits for EdwardsAFB. The HousingCommunityProfile andHousingRequirements
and MarketAnalysisare elementsof the GeneralPlan for EdwardsAFB, andarethe basis for this project.
CURRENTSITUATION: Theseexistinghousingunitswereconstructedin the 1950s.They showthe effects
of ageand heavyuse.Theyhavehadno majorupgradessinceconstruction,and theydo not meetthe needsof
today'sfamilies, nor do theyprovidea modemhomeenvironment.The roof, walls, foundations,and exterior
pavementsrequiremajor repairor replacementdueto age.Theplumbingand electricalsystemsare antiquated
and do not meetcurrentstandardsfor efficiency and safety.Interiorsare generallyinadequateby modemcriteria.
Bathroomsare smalland lack adequateclosetspace.Kitchenshaveinsufficientcabinets,storage,and counter
space.Lighting, heating,and air conditioning systemsrequireupgradeandreplacement.The currentHousing
Requirementsand MarketAnalysisandHousing CommunityProfile supportreplacement.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVillED: Asbestoslimits maintainability,units are40+ yearsold, infrastructureis
dilapidateddueto constantcontinuoususe,andunits do not meettheneedsof modemMilitary Family needs.
This project conformsto the HousingMasterPlanwhich indicatesArea F asthe mostdire areaneeding
replacement.
ADDInONAL: This projectmeetsthe criteria/scopespecifiedin the Air ForceFamily Housing Guide. An
economicanalysishasbeenpreparedcomparingthe alternatesof new construction,improvement,leasingand
statusquo operation.Basedonthe net presentvaluesandbenefitof respectivealternatives,new construction
wasfound to be the mosteffectivealternativeoverthe life of theproject.The improvementcostis more than
the replacementcost.Sincethis is replacementhousing,therewill be no increasein the studentpopulationand
thereforeno impact on local schooldistrict. BaseCivil Engineer:Mr. JamesE. Judkins,(DSN) 527-2910.
DDFORM1391C,DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
350
MILITARY
FAMILY
HOUSING
JUSTIFICATION
1. DATE
OF REPORT
2.
FISCALYEAR
July-04
3. DOD
COMPONENT
4. REPORTING
AIR FORCE
5.
DATA
CONTROL
SYMBOL
DD-A&L(AR)1716
INSTALlATION
a. NAME
b.
AS OF
REPORT
2006
EDWARDS
AIR FORCE
LOCATION
BASE
CALIFORNIA
Nov-03
ANALYSIS
CURRENT
OF
OFFICER
REQUIREMENTS
6. TOTAL
7.
PERSONNEL
PERMANENT
8. GROSS
9. TOTAL
AND
E6-E1
TOTAL
(b)
(c)
(d)
690
325
2,289
675
326
2,312
690
325
2,289
675
326
2,312
ASSETS
(a)
OFFICER
(e)
E9-E7
(I)
E6-E1
TOTAL
(9)
h
STRENGTH
PARTY
FAMILY
PROJECTED
ES-E7
PERSONNEL
HOUSING
UNACCEPTABLY
REQUIREMENTS
HOUSED
(a + b + c)
a INVOLUNTARILY SEPARATED
b IN MILITARY HOUSING TO BE
DISPOSED/REPLACED
0
C. UNACCEPTABLY HOUSED IN COMMUNITY
0
10.
VOLUNTARY
11.
EFFECTIVE
12.
HOUSING
SEPARATIONS
3
HOUSING
ASSETS
REQUIREMENTS
(a + b)
a UNDER MILITARY CONTROL
(1) HOUSED IN EXISTING DOD
OWNED/CONTROLLED
(2) UNDER CONTRACT/APPROVED
(3) VACANT
(4) INACTIVE
b. PRIVATE HOUSING
(1) ACCEPTABLY HOUSED
(2) ACCEPTABLE VACANT RENTAL
13.
EFFECTIVE
14.
PROPOSED
15.
REMARKS
HOUSING
DEFICIT
PROJECT
DO FORM 1523. NOV"
351
1. COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
COMMAND
5. AREA CONST
BOLLING AIR FORCE BASE
AIR FORCE DISTRICT OF
COST INDEX
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
WASHINGTON
1.02
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
Strength
OFF
ENL
CIV
OFF ENL
CIV
OFF
ENL
CIV
AS OF 30 SEP 04
392
1245
916
0
0
0
301
784
40
END FY 2009
392
1231
953
0
0
0
301
784
40
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
607
Inventory Total as of: (30 Sep 04)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2007)
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
551,780
3,473
48,711
82,455
0
15000
701,419
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
QQQS
PROJECT TITLE
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing
SCOPE
159 UN
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing
264 UN
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
None
TOTAL
3,678
3,701
(FY 2006)
COST DESIGN
$.000
START
48.711 Aug-04
STATUS
CMPL
Jun-05
(FY 2007)
82,455
(FY08-11)
9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
10. A support wing for Air Force personnel in the National Capitol Region; Headquarters USAF functions
including Chief of Chaplains, Surgeon General, and Historian; Headquarters Air Force Office of Special
Investigation; Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Air Force Legal Services Agency; Air Force Medical
Operations Agency; USAF Band; and USAF Honor Guard.
806
DD Form 1390, 24 Jul 00
352
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
1
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA.
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
BOLLING AIR FORCEBASE, DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA
REPLACEFAMIL Y HOUSING
1
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
60CATEGORY CODE
88741
1
711-142
70 PROJECT NUMBER
BXUR221164
9. COST ESTIMATE
U/M
QUANTITY
ITEM
Military Family Housing
Dwellings
RenewableEnergySource
Other SpecialConstruction
SupportCosts:
Lot Costs
Site Improvements
2 DATE
S. PROJECT COST ($000)
$48,711
UNIT COST
COSTi$ooQl
LS
LS
23,687
(21,016)
(730)
( 1,941 )
20,286
( 865 )
( 3,050 )
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
( 884 )
( 6,000 )
( 2,800 )
( 800 )
( 3,000 )
( 2,200 )
( 687 )
UN
UN
UN
Landscaping
Utility Mains
Streets
Recreation
Demolition
Environmental
OtherSite Work
l
1
159
159
159
132,176
4,591
12,208
Subtotal
Contingency (5%)
Total ContractCost
SIOH (5.5%)
43,973
2,198
46,171
2,539
ProjectCost
48,711
Area CostFactor (1.021
10. Descriptionof ProposedConstruction:Demolish278 and construct159 multiplex family housingunits
with all necessaryamenitiesandsupportingfacilities. Projectincludessite preparation,two car garages,air
conditioning,energyconservingfeatures,parking, exteriorpatiosand privacy fencing,supportinfrastructureof
roads,utilities, recreationareas,landscaping,asbestosremoval,anddemolition.Renewenergyincludessolar
heatingand groundwaterheatpumps.Specialconstructionincludespatios,porches,decks,exteriorstorages,
etc.
Programmed
Project
.G.SM
No
($000)
773
773
773
64
47
11
6,914
6,411
1,631
1.02
1.02
1.02
773
773
773
11
15
9
1,865
2,046
1,661
1.02
773
2
Pa~grades
Bedrooms
~
Q.s.E
~
E4-E6
E7-E8
E9
2M
3
3
1,180
1,500
1,630
1,480
1,860
2,020
137
173
188
1.02
1.02
1.02
E9
01-03
06
4
3
4
1,860
1,500
2,030
2,310
1,860
2,520
215
173
234
07+
4
2,690
3,330
309
Cost Per
.G.SM!.lnit§
Totals:
Maximum size: E4-E6 2M Bedroom
Maximum size: E7-E8 3 Bedroom
Maximum size: E9 3 Bedroom
Maximum size: E9 4 Bedroom
DDFORM1391,DEC99
IQtg.!
159
488
21,016
1300 NSF /1630 GSF /151 GSM
1650 NSF /2050 GSF /190 GSM
1850 NSF /2300 GSF /214 GSM
2180 NSF /2700 GSF /251 GSM
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNAllYUNTil EXHAUSTED
3:53
-
~---
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
1
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA.
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
BOLLING AIR FORCEBASE, DISTRICT OF
REPLACEFAMILY HOUSING
COLUMBIA
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
1
11. REQUIREMENT: 6217 UN
2 DATE
'
6. CATEGORY CODE
88741
Maximum
size:01-03 3 Bedroom
Maximum
size:06 4 Bedroom
Maximum
size:07+ 4 Bedroom
1
l a, PROJECT $48,711
COST ($000)
17. PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
BXUR221164
1650NSF/2050GSF/190GSM
2350NSF/2920GSF/271GSM
3270NSF/4060GSF/377GSM
ADEQUATE: 5760 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 457 UN
PROJECT:REPLACEFAMILY HOUSING
REOUIREMENT:Projectis requiredto provide modemand efficienthousingfor military membersand their
dependentsatBolling AFB. All units will meetmodernhousingstandardsand areprogrammedin accordance
with the HousingCommunityProfIle.The designwill providea modernkitchen, living room, family rooIn,
bedrooIn,and bath configuration,with ample interior and exteriorstorage.The numberof bedroomswill range
from two to four, asidentified in the mostrecenthousingmarketanalysis.Units will be provided with a two
car garageand exteriorparking for anothervehicle.Adequateinfrastructuresupportfor roadsandutilities shall
alsobe provided.This is part of a multiphaseinitiative to replacean additional159housing units for Bolling
AFB. Housing CommunityProfile andHousingRequirements
andMarketAnalysis are consistentwith the
GeneralPlan for Bolling AFB, andarethebasisfor this project.
CURRENTSI11JATIQN:Theseexistinghousingunits wereconstructedin the 1970s.They showthe effects
of ageand heavyuse.Theyhavehadno majorupgradessinceconstruction,and theydo not meetthe needsof
today'sfamilies,nor do theyprovidea modernhomeenvironment.Roof, wall, foundationsand exterior
pavementsrequiremajor repair of replacementdueto age.Plumbingand electricalsystemsareantiquatedand
do not meetcurrentstandardsfor efficiencyandsafety.Interiorsare generallyinadequateby moderncriteria.
Bathroomsare smalland bedroomslack adequateclosetspace.Kitchenshave insufficient cabinets,storageand
counterspace.Lighting, heatingand air conditioningsystemsrequireupgradeandreplacement.Current
HousingRequirements
and MarketAnalysis andthe HousingCommunityProfile renovationcostsexceedthe
currentreplacementcost.The costto correcteminentproblemsexistingwith the inventory,spacedeficiencies,
and modernizationrequirementshasprovento be more costlythanthe original vouchercostandthe
capitalizationcombined.
IMP ACT IF NOT PROVIDED:Units will continueto deterioraterapidly,resultingin increasingoperations,
maintenanceand repairto the governmentandinconvenienceto residents.Without this project,repairto these
unitswill continuein a costlypiecemealfashionwith little or no improvementin living quality.
ADDITIONAL: Demolish/replace159 multiplex family housingunits with all necessaryamenitiesand
supportingfacilities. Projectincludessite preparation,attachedtwo car garages,air conditioning,energy
conservingfeatures,parking,exteriorpatiosand privacy fencing,supportinfrastructureof roads,utilities,
recreationareas,landscaping,asbestosremoval,anddemolition.Work includesthe lastphaseof an electrical
loop for Westoverhousing.This projectalsoincludesthe buyoutcostof amortizingthe naturalgaslines that
will be removedduring construction.BaseCivil Engineer:Lt CotDennisJasinski,(202)767-5565.
..
DDFORM1391C,DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
354
!
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION
1. DATE OF REPORT
2. FISCAL YEAR
July-o4
3. DOC COMPONENT
REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL
2006
DD-A&L(AR)1716
4. REPORTING INSTALLATION
AIR FORCE
a. NAME
b. LOCATION
5. DATA AS OF
BOLLING AIR FORCE BASE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
May-o4
ANALYSIS
CURRENT
OF
REQUIREMENTS AND ASSETS
6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH
7. PERMANENT
PROJECTED
OFFICER
(a)
E9-E7
(b)
E6-E1
(c)
TOTAL
(d)
OFFICER
(e)
E9-E7
(f)
E6-E1
(g)
4,716
1,327
2,601
8,644
4,615
1,335
2,615
4,716
1,327
2,601
4,615
1,335
2,615
26
69
64
0
0
37
TOTAL
(h)
PARTY PERSONNEL
8. GROSS FAMILY HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
3,832
9. TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY
HOUSED
(a+b+c)
26
a INVOLUNTARILYSEPARATED
0
b. IN MILITARYHOUSINGTO BE
DISPOSEDIREPLACED
C. UNACCEPTABLYHOUSEDIN COMMUNITY
10. VOLUNTARY
SEPARAnONS
117
11. EFFECTIVE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
12. HOUSING ASSETS
(a + b)
a. UNDERMILITARYCONTROL
(1) HOUSEDIN EXISTINGDOD
OWNED/CONTROLLED
(2) UNDERCONTRACT/APPROVED
(3) VACANT
(4) INACTIVE
b. PRIVATEHOUSING
(1) ACCEPTABLYHOUSED
(2) ACCEPTABLEVACANTRENTAL
13. EFFECTIVE HOUSING DEFICIT
14. PROPOSED PROJECT
15. REMARKS
DDFORM
1513,
Nav..
355
1. COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
COMMAND
5. AREA CONST
MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE
AIR MOBILITY COMMAND
COST INDEX
FLORIDA
0.89
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
Strength
OFF
ENL
CIV
OFF ENL
CIV
ASOF30SEP04
328
1943 1182
0
0
0
END FY2009
327
1938 1182
0
0
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
5,767
Inventory Total as of: (30 Sep 04)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2007)
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
OFF
1252
1338
ENL
2114
2147
CIV
806
806
1,287,356
76,400
40,982
24,171
0
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
~
PROJECT TITLE
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph 7
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph 8
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL
7,625
7,738
130000
1,558,909
(FY 2006)
SCOPE
109 UN
COST DESIGN
$,000
START
40,982 Aug-04
STATUS
CMPL
Jul-05
(FY 2007)
70 UN
24,171
(FY08-11)
None
9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
376
10. An air refueling wing with a KC-135 squadron; tenets include US Special Operations Command and US
Central Command.
DD Form 1390,24 Jul 00
356
'i~Wt~;:::
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
MACDll..L AIR FORCEBASE, FLORmA
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
2. DATE
REPLACEFAMll..Y HOUSING PHASE 7
6. CATEGORY CODE
88741
7. PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
9. COST ESTIMATE
U/M
QUANTITY
ITEM
Military Family Housing
Dwellings
Other SpecialConstruction
SupportCosts:
Site Improvements
Utility Mains
Streets
Demolition
OtherSite Work
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
NVZR043701R1
UN
UN
109
109
$40,982
UNIT COST
COST $000
21,059
( 15,114)
(5,945 )
15,867
( 5,967 )
(5,152 )
( 2,552 )
( 1,170 )
( 1,026)
138,661
54,541
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
Subtotal
Contingency (5%)
Total ContractCost
SIOH (5.7%)
36,926
1,846
38,772
2,210
ProjectCost
40,982
Area CostFactor 0.89
10. Descriptionof ProposedConstruction:Replaces109 Military FamilyHousingUnits. Includessite
clearing,replacementand/orupgradeof utility systemsand roads,and designand constructionof singlefamily,
duplexor town houseunits. Providesnormalamenitiesto includeappliances,carports,parking, air
conditioning,patiosand privacyfencing. Specialconstructionfeaturesdenotedesignand constructionof units
to withstandhurricanesand stormsurges.Demolishes86 surplusinadequateunits.
Programmed
Payarades
Bedrooms
~
Y.§E
Project
~
~
Cost Per
No
($000)
~.!.!.!:!1!.$.
IQ!El
E1-E3
E1-E3
3
4
1,310
1,570
1,630
1,950
151
181
0.89
0.89
773
773
26
24
2,701
2,989
04-05
04-05
06
3
4
4
1,630
1,860
2,030
2,020
2,310
2,520
188
215
234
0.89
0.89
0.89
773
773
773
12
24
11
1,552
3,550
1,771
07+
4
2,690
3,330
309
0.89
773
Totals:
Maximum size: E1-E3
3 Bedroom
1420 NSF /1760 GSF /164 GSM
Maximum size: E1-E3 4 Bedroom
Maximum size: 04-05 3 Bedroom
1790 NSF /2220 GSF /206 GSM
1850 NSF /2300 GSF /214 GSM
Maximum size: 04-05 4 Bedroom
Maximum size: 06 4 Bedroom
Maximum size: 07+ 4 Bedroom
2180 NSF /2700 GSF /251 GSM
2350 NSF /2920 GSF /271 GSM
3270 NSF /4060 GSF /377 GSM
11. REQUIREMENT: 3476 UN
ADEQUATE: 3292 UN
12
2,551
109
15,114
SUBSTANDARD: 184 UN
PROJECT:ReplaceFamily Housing,Phase7. (CurrentMission)
RE UIREMENT: This ro.ectis re uired to rovide modemandefficientre lacementhousin
DDFORM1391,DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNnLEXHAUSTED
357
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
MACDILL AIR FORCEBASE, FLORIDA
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
1
!
2 DATE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA'
6. CATEGORY CODE
REPLACEFAMIL Y HOUSING PHASE 7
7. PROJECT NUMBER
8. PROJECT COST ($OOO)
88741
711-142
NVZRO43701Rl
$40,982
membersand their dependents
stationedatMacDil1AFB. All units will meet"whole house"standardsand are
programmedin accordancewith MacDill's Housing CommunityPlan andGOQ MasterPlan. Replacement
housingwill providea safe,comfortable,andappealingliving environmentcomparableto the off-basecivilian
community.The replacementhousingwill provide a modemkitchen,living room,dining room and bath
configuration,with ample interior and exteriorstorageandvehicleprotection.Off-streetparking will be
provided for a secondvehicle.The basicneighborhoodsupportinfrastructurewill be upgradedto meetmodem
housingneeds.Neighborhoodenhancements
will include landscaping,
playgrounds,and recreationareas.
Climatic considerations
require specialconstructionmeasuresto withstandseverestorms(hurricanes)and tidal
surges.Five percentof the replacementhousingunits,by type/rank,shallbe madeaccessibleto the disabledas
mandatedby the Americanswith DisabilitiesAct.
CURRENTSI11JATION:This projectreplaceshousesthat are over45 yearsold andare showingthe effectsof
ageand continuousheavyuse.Theyhavehadno majorupgradessinceconstructionand do not meetthe needs
of today'sfamilies.Existing housesareinadequatein size.Roofs,walls, foundations,and exteriorpavements
require major repairor replacement.Plumbingand electricalsystemsareantiquatedanddo not meetcurrent
standardsfor efficiency or safety.Lack of adequateparking spacesfor occupantshascreatedexcessive
congestion.Housinginteriorsareinadequateby any modemcriteria. Bedroomsare smalland lack sufficient
closetspace.Bathroomsare small;fIXturesareoutdatedand energyinefficient. Kitchenshaveinadequate
storageand counterspace;cabinetsareold andunsightly; countertopsand sinksare badlyworn. Flooring
throughoutthe housesis worn andsomecontainsasbestos.Utility systemsrequireexcessivemaintenanceand
repair.Housing densityis excessive,creatinga noisy,chaoticliving environment.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Air Forcemembersand their families will continueto live in extremelysmall,
outdatedand unsatisfactoryhousing.The unitswill deterioratefurther,resultingin escalatingandunacceptable
maintenanceand repair costsas well asinconveniencingthe occupants.Without this and subsequent
phasesof
this initiative, repairswill continuein a costly,piecemealfashionwith little or no improvementin occupant
quality of life. Thesedeficiencieswill continueto adverselyaffectthe morale of all personneland their family
membersassignedto the base.
ADDITIONAL: This projectmeetsthe criteria/scopespecifiedin PartII of Military Handbook1190,"Facility
Planningand DesignGuide".Sincethis is replacementhousing,therewill be no increasein the student
populationor impacton the ability of the local schooldistrictto supportbasedependents.
An economic
analysishasbeenpreparedcomparingthe alternativesof new construction,revitalization,leasing,and status
quo operation.Basedon the net presentvaluesandbenefitsof therespectivealternatives,improvementwas
foundto be the most costeffective overthe life of the project. However,sincerevitalizationexceeded70% of
the replacementvalue of the houses,replacementconstructionwasselected.The constructionagentfor this
project will be the Army Corpsof Engineers,resultingin SIOHof 5.7%.BaseCivil Engineer:Lt Col
AnthonyA. Foti, (813)828-3577.
DOFORM1391C, DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDmONSMAYBEUSEDINTERNAlLY
UNTlLEXHAUSTED
,.358
II
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION
1. DATE OF REPORT
2. FISCAL YEAR
July-04
3. DOD COMPONENT
REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL
DD-A&L(AR)1716
4. REPORTING INSTALLATION
AIR FORCE
5.
2006
a. NAME
DATA AS OF
b. LOCATION
MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE
Phase 7
FLORIDA
Aug-04
ANALYSIS
OF
REQUIREMENTS AND ASSETS
6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH
7. PERMANENT
CURRENT
OFFICER
E9-E7
(a)
(b)
E6-E1
(c)
TOTAL
(d)
PROJECTED
OFFICER
E9-E7
(e)
(f)
E6-E1
(g)
1,580
563
3,494
5,637
1,665
574
3,511
1,580
563
3,494
5,637
1,665
574
3,511
0
0
0
59
0
50
27
0
634
TOTAL
PARTY PERSONNEL
8. GROSS FAMILY HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
1,320
9. TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY
HOUSED (a+b+c)
a INVOLUNTARILYSEPARATED
b. IN MILITARYHOUSINGTO BE
DISPOSED/REPLACED
C UNACCEPTABLYHOUSEDIN COMMUNITY
10. VOLUNTARY
SEPARATIONS
81
11. EFFECTIVE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
12. HOUSING ASSETS
(a + b)
a UNDERMILITARYCONTROL
(1) HOUSEDIN EXISTINGDOD
OWNED/CONTROLLED
(2) UNDERCONTRACT/APPROVED
(3) VACANT
(4) INACTIVE
b. PRIVATEHOUSING
(1) ACCEPTABLYHOUSED
.13.
(2) ACCEPTABLEVACANT RENTAL
EFFECTIVE HOUSING DEFICIT
14. PROPOSED
~
1:1
I
0
PROJECT
15. REMARKS
DD FORM1523,NOV"
359
1. COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
INSTALLATION AND lOCATION
COMMAND
5. AREA CONST
MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE BASE
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
COST INDEX
IDAHO
1.11
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
Strength
OFF
ENl
CIV
OFF ENl
CIV
OFF
ENl
CIV
AS OF 30 SEP 04
453
4208 1139
0
32
0
0
0
59
END FY 2009
450
4139
601
0
32
0
0
0
59
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
10,050
Inventory Total as of: (30 Sep 04)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2007)
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
1,935,638
15,137
56,467
111,614
0
65700
2,184,556
(FY 2006)
COST DESIGN
~
PROJECTTITLE
SCOPE
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph 7
194 UN
56,467
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph 8
457 UN
(FY 2007)
111,614
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL
5,891
5,281
$.000
START
STATUS
CMPl
Aug-04
May-05
(FY08-11)
None
9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
1,130
10. A composite wing with one F-16 squadron; one F-15 C/O squadron, one F-15E squadron, one KC-135R
squadron, a B-1 B squadron, and the AEF Battlelab.
DO Form 1390, 24 Jul 00
..,.
c:,.",
".~
'i~
60
~~~:c;~~'~'"
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2 DATE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA.
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE BASE,IDAHO
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
REPLACEMILITARY FAMILY HOUSING PH 7
6. CATEGORY CODE
88741
7. PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
9. COST ESTIMATE
U/M
QUANTITY
ITEM
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
YZH887176
Military Family Housing
Dwellings
OtherSpecialConstruction
SupportCosts:
Lot Costs
Site Improvements
Landscaping
Utility Mains
Streets
Recreation
Demolition
Environmental
OtherSite Work
UN
UN
194
194
$56,467
UNIT COST
COST $000
34,447
( 29,095 )
(5,352)
16,431
( 1,166 )
( 1,867)
( 806 )
( 5,201 )
( 2,043 )
( 874 )
( 2,067 )
( 1,485 )
(922)
149,974
27,588
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
18
LS
LS
LS
Subtotal
Contingency (5%)
Total ContractCost
SIOH (5.7%)
50,878
2,543
53,421
3,044
ProjectCost
56,467
Area Cost Factor 1.11
10. Descriptionof ProposedConstruction:Demolish258 and construct194family housingunits with all
necessaryamenitiesand supportingfacilities. Projectincludessite preparation,attachedgarages,air
conditioning,energyconservingfeatures,parking,exteriorpatiosand privacy fencing. Supportinfrastructure
areasinclude roads,utilities, recreationareas,landscaping,demolitionplus asbestosandleadbasedpaint
removal.Specialconstructionincludes,arctic climate construction,crawl spacesfor utilities, concretefootings
and foundationwalls to preventfrost upheaval,andvinyl or hardi-planksiding.
Programmed
Project
Paygrades
Bedrooms
NSE
~
.G.SM
E4-E6
E4-E6
2M
3
1,180
1,310
1,480
1,630
137
151
E4-E6
4
1,570
1,950
E7-E8
E7-E8
01-03
01-03
01-03
04-05
04-05
06
3
4
2M
3
4
3
4
4
1,500
1,730
1,350
1,500
1,730
1,630
1,860
2,030
1,860
2,150
1,670
1,860
2,150
2,020
2,310
2,520
~
Cost Per
~
Maximum size: E4-E6 2M Bedroom
1300 NSF /1630
($000)
IQtgl
1.11
1.11
773
773
13
30
1,528
3,887
181
1.11
773
39
6,057
173
200
155
173
200
188
215
234
1.11
1.11
1.11
1.11
1.11
1.11
1.11
1.11
773
773
773
773
773
773
773
773
9
8
31
17
19
11
11
6
1,336
1,373
4,123
2,523
3,260
1,775
2,029
1,204
194
29,095
Totals:
DD FORM 1391, DEC 99
No
~
GSF /151 GSM
PREVIOUSEDITIONSMAYBE USED If'lTERNALLYUNTIL EXHAUSTED
361
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCEBASE, IDAHO
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
size:
size:
size:
size:
REPLACEMILITARY FAMILY HOUSING PH 7
6. CATEGORY CODE
88741
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
7. PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
E4-E6 3 Bedroom
E4-E6 4 Bedroom
E7-E8 3 Bedroom
E7-E8 4 Bedroom
Maximum size: 01-03
Maximum size: 01-03
Maximum size: 01-03
2M Bedroom
3 Bedroom
4 Bedroom
Maximum size: 04-05
1420
1790
1650
2020
NSF
NSF
NSF
NSF
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
YZH887176
$56,467
/1760 GSF /164 GSM
/2220 GSF /206 GSM
/2050 GSF /190 GSM
/2500 GSF /232 GSM
1540 NSF /1920
1650 NSF /2050
2020 NSF /2500
GSF /178 GSM
GSF /190 GSM
GSF /232 GSM
3 Bedroom
1850 NSF /2300
GSF /214 GSM
Maximum size: 04-05 4 Bedroom
Maximum size: 06 4 Bedroom
2180 NSF /2700
2350 NSF /2920
GSF /251 GSM
GSF /271 GSM
11. REQUIREMENT: 2794 UN
2. DATE
ADEQUATE: 2131 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 663 UN
PROJECT:REPLACE FAMIL Y HOUSING (Phase7) A DesigniBuild Project
REOUIREMENT:This projectis requiredto provide modernand efficient housingfor military membersand
their dependentsstationedat MountainHome Air ForceBase(MHAFB). All units will meetmodern"Whole
House"standardsandprogrammingin accordancewith the HousingCommunityProfile (HCP). Construct
housing,providing a comfortableandappealingliving environmentcomparableto the off-basecivilian
community.Providemodernkitchens,living rooms,dining rooms,bath configurationsandtwo to four
bedroomsasidentified in the mostrecentHousingRequirements
and MarketAnalysis(HRMA). Supply
ample interior and exteriorstorageareas,enclosedgaragesand off-streetparking for an additionalvehicle.
Providebasicneighborhoodsupportinfrastructure,roadsand utilities, constructappropriaterecreationareasfor
dependentyouthand childrenplus install bussheltersto meetmodernhousingneeds.Performlead and
asbestosabatementasrequired.Housesinclude crawl spacesfor utilities, foundationwalls for frost heave
prevention,vinyl or hardi-planksiding and residentialirrigation systems.Needto reworkexisting subdivision
footprints,gradingandutilities in newneighborhoods
plus substantialrock excavationfor footing and utility
installation.Not all existingfunctionalutilities canbe usedbecausetheycouldbe sizedtoo small for the new
usesor locatedin the wrong places.
CURRENTSITUATION: Currenthousingunits,constructedin 1956and 1962,do not meet"Whole House"
standardsand are in unsatisfactoryconditiondueto the affectsof ageand heavyuse.Efficiency and safety
deficienciesincludeinfrastructure-electrical, plumbingand mechanicalsystems;antiquatedkitchensand
bathrooms;flat/low pitchedroofsrequiringhigh maintenance;leadpaintandasbestos
containingmaterials;
deterioratingkitchen/bathroomcabinets,sinksandfloors plus inadequatecounterspaceand storageareas.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Units will continuedeterioraterapidlyand Air ForceFamilies will continue
to live in unsatisfactoryhousingconditions.As the existing units age,the maintenanceand repair costson
theseunits increaseswith little or no improvementin living quality.
ADDInONAL: This projectincludesthe demolitionof the lastremainingsurplusunitsidentified in the
Housing CommunityProfile (HCP)document.The economicanalysiscomparedall construction,renovation
andstatus-quoalternativestowardprovidingthe bestquality military family housing.The economicanalysis
found new constructionto be the mostcosteffectiveoption overthe life of the project.This replacement
housingwill not increasethe studentpopulationor negativelyimpactthe local schooldistrict. The
improvementcostis 79% of replacement
cost.The Corpsof Engineerswill be the agencyto provide contract
management
and supervisionof this project.The 366thCivil EngineerSquadronCommanderis Lt. Col.
ScottR. Jarvis, (208)828-6353.
DDFORM1391C, DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNT1L
EXHAUSTED
362
;~i;
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION
1. DATE OF REPORT
July-04
4. REPORTING INSTALLATION
3. DOD COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2. FISCAL YEAR
2006
a. NAME
REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL
DD-A&L(AR)1716
b. LOCATION
5. DATA AS OF
MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE BASE
Phase 7
IDAHO
Dec-03
ANALYSIS
OF
REQUIREMENTS
6. TOTAL PERSONNEL
7.
PERMANENT
CURRENT
AND ASSETS
PROJECTED
OFFICER
(a)
E9-E7
(b)
E6-E1
(c)
TOTAL
(d)
OFFICER
(e)
E9-E7
(f)
E6-E1
(g)
407
428
3,485
4,320
417
449
3,655
407
428
3,485
4,320
417
449
3,655
17
82
TOTAL
STRENGTH
PARTY PERSONNEL
8. GROSS FAMILY HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
390
9. TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY
HOUSED
(a+b+c)
50
82
0
0
0
95
17
82
0
33
0
a. INVOLUNTARILY
SEPARATED
b. IN MILITARYHOUSINGTO BE
DISPOSED/REPLACED
C. UNACCEPTABLYHOUSEDIN COMMUNITY
10. VOLUNTARY
SEPARATIONS
1
17
11. EFFECTIVE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
12. HOUSING ASSETS
(a + b)
a. UNDERMILITARYCONTROL
(1) HOUSEDIN EXISTINGDOD
OWNED/CONTROLLED
(2) UNDERCONTRACT/APPROVED
(3) VACANT
(4) INACTIVE
b. PRIVATEHOUSING
(1) ACCEPTABLYHOUSED
(2) ACCEPTABLEVACANT RENTAL
13. EFFECTIVE HOUSING DEFICIT
14. PROPOSED
PROJECT
15. REMARKS
DD roRMU13.NOV..
"'c';"
363
1. COMPONENT
FY 2006
AIR FORCE
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
WHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE
MISSOURI
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
Strength
OFF
ENL
AS OF 30 SEP 03
457
4098
END FY 2008
450
4010
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM.
DATE
COMMAND
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
CIV
916
854
STUDENTS
OFF ENL
CIV
0
5
0
0
5
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
5,214
Inventory Total as of: (30 Sep 03)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
5. AREA CONST
COST INDEX
1.07
SUPPORTED
OFF
ENL
CIV
0
1
0
0
1
0
1,372,989
61,289
26,917
22,001
0
0
1,483,196
(FY 2007)
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
~
PROJECT TITLE
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing
SCOPE
111 UN
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing
95 UN
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
None
TOTAL
5,477
5,320
(FY 2006)
COST DESIGN
$.000
START
26,917 Aug-04
STATUS
CMPL
Jun-05
(FY 2007)
22,001
(FY08-11)
9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installatior
800
10. A bomber wing with two squadrons of B-2 aircraft; and an Air Force Reserve fighter wing with one NOA-1 0
squadron.
DD Form 1390, 24 Jul 00
384
t
1
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA.
J2
DATE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
WHITEMAN AIR FORCEBASE, MISSOURI
REPLACEMILITARY FAMILY HOUSING AND
LAND ACj;lillSITION
1
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY CODE
88741
17. PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
YWHG029303R1
9. COST ESTIMATE
U/M
QUANTITY
ITEM
Military Family Housing
Dwellings
Other SpecialConstruction
SupportCosts:
Force ProtectionFence
Lot Costs
Site Improvements
Landscaping
Utility Mains
Streets
Recreation
Demolition
Environmental
OtherSite Work
Land Purchase
UN
UN
111
111
LF
LS
LS
4,000
1
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
$26,917
UNIT COST
COST-L$oo~
18,420
( 14,559)
(3,861 )
5,832
( 80 )
( 672 )
( 483 )
131,162
34,784
20
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
( 179 )
( 2,080 )
( 385 )
( 59 )
( 1,235 )
( 282 )
(27)
( 350 )
Subtotal
Contingency (5%)
Total ContractCost
SIOH (5.7%)
24,252
1,212
25,464
1,451
ProjectCost
26,917
Area CostFactor (1.07)
10. Descriptionof ProposedConstruction:Designand construct111JNCOand SNCOsingle or duplex
family housingunits with all necessary
support.Includes:land acquisition,site development,utilities,
pavements,streetlighting, forceprotection,air conditioning,recreationfacility and play areas,landscaping,and
othernecessarysupport.Specialconstructionincludes:2 car garages,stormshelters,and crawl space
foundations.Projectis to includedemolitionof 111 existingunits.
Programmed
Pavarades
Bedrooms
~
Y.QE
E4-E6
E4-E6
E4-E6
E7-E8
2M
3
4
3
1,180
1,310
1,570
1,500
1,480
1,630
1,950
1,860
E7-E8
4
1,730
2,150
Project
Cost Per
No
($000)
137
151
181
173
1.07
1.07
1.07
1.07
773
773
773
773
42
25
24
10
4,759
3,122
3,593
1,431
200
1.07
773
~
~
~!.!:nj1§.
Totals:
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
size:
size:
size:
size:
size:
E4-E6
E4-E6
E4-E6
E7-E8
E7-E8
DOFORM1391,DEC99
2M Bedroom
3 Bedroom
4 Bedroom
3 Bedroom
4 Bedroom
1300
1420
1790
1650
2020
NSF
NSF
NSF
NSF
NSF
11630
11760
12220
12050
12500
GSF
GSF
GSF
GSF
GSF
1151
1164
1206
1190
1232
IQ.!,g1
10
1,654
111
14,559
GSM
GSM
GSM
GSM
GSM
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UN11L
EXHAUSTED
3'65
,---~
,
~
~~~~;~~
J
FY 2006 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
DATA
12. DATE
3. INSTALLATION
AND LOCATION
4. PROJECTTITLE
WHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE, MISSOURI
REPLACEMILITARY FAMILY HOUSING AND
LAND AGQUISITION
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
88741
11. REQUIREMENT:
1978UN
1
6. CATEGORYCODE
711-142
ADEQUATE:1772UN
1
7. PROJECTNUMBER
YWHG029303R1
18.
PROJECTCOST($000)
$26,917
SUBSTANDARD:
206 UN
PROJECT:ReplaceMilitary Family Housingandacquirenecessary
land to meetwhole-houseand new
housingsite standards.(CurrentMission)
REOUIREMENT:This projectis requiredto provide modem,efficienthousingfor military membersand their
families stationedat WhitemanAFB. All units will meetwhole-housestandardsandareprogrammedin
accordancewith the Housing CommunityPlan.This housingwill provide safe,comfortable,and appealing
living environmentcomparableto the off-basecivilian community.Stormsheltershave beenauthorizeddueto
the high likelihood of severeweatherincluding tornadoes.Crawlspacefoundationsarerequireddue to highly
expansiveclaysoils thatareprohibitive for slab on gradeconstruction.
CURRENTSI1UAnON: The rural communitysurroundingWhitemanAFB doesnot have sufficient,
adequatehousingassetsto supportexistingrequirements.Off-basehousingis very difficult to find and
expensive.No land is availablewithin currentbaseboundariesto supportconstructionof the largersized
replacementhomesdueto an agreementwith the NaturalResourcesDepartmentto closean environmental
restotationsite for Chlordaneby convertingland use from residentialto administrativeor industrial.This
changeis shownin theWhitemanAFB Comprehensive
Plan thatis currentlyunderrevision.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Units will continueto deterioraterapidly,resulting in increasingoperations,
maintenanceand repairto the governmentandinconvenienceto residents.Without the project,repair of these
units will continuein acostlypiecemealfashionwith little or no improvementin living quality.
ADDITIONAL: This projectmeetsthe criteria/scopespecifiedin the Air ForceFamily Housing Guide for
Planning,Programming,Design,andConstruction.An economicanalysishas beenpreparedcomparingthe
alternativesof new construction,improvement,andstatusquo operation.The economicanalysisfound new
constructionis the mostcosteffectiveoption.The improvementcostis more than 100%of the replacement
cost.The constructionagentfor this projectis the Army Corpsof Engineers,resultingin SIOH costsof 5.7%.
BaseCivil Engineer:JefferyYinger at DSN 975-3503.
DDFORM1391C,DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALlY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
"..
'~
..,.~.
66
MILITARY
FAMILY
HOUSING
JUSTIFICATION
1.
DATE
OF REPORT
2.
FISCAL
July-Q4
3.
DOD
AIR
5.
COMPONENT
4.
FORCE
DATA
REPORTING
REPORT
CONTROL
SYMBOL
DD-A&L(AR)1716
INSTALLATION
a. NAME
b.
AS OF
YEAR
2006
WHITEMAN
AIR
FORCE
LOCATION
BASE
MISSOURI
Oct-03
ANALYSIS
CURRENT
OF
OFFICER
REQUIREMENTS
6. TOTAL
7.
PERSONNEL
PERMANENT
8. GROSS
9. TOTAL
AND
(a)
(b)
E6-E1
TOTAL
(c)
(d)
OFFICER
(e)
E9-E7
(f)
E6-E1
TOTAL
(g)
STRENGTH
PARTY
FAMILY
ASSETS
PROJECTED
E9-E7
425
336
2,821
3,582
424
336
2,817
425
336
2,821
3,582
424
336
2,817
0
20
91
56
0
52
PERSONNEL
HOUSING
UNACCEPTABLY
REQUIREMENTS
HOUSED
(a + b + c)
a. INVOLUNTARILY SEPARATED
b. IN MILITARY HOUSING TO BE
DISPOSED/REPLACED
C. UNACCEPTABLY
10.
VOLUNTARY
11.
EFFECTIVE
12.
HOUSING
HOUSED IN COMMUNITY
SEPARATIONS
3
HOUSING
ASSETS
REQUIREMENTS
(a + b)
a UNDER MILITARY CONTROL
(1) HOUSED IN EXISTING DOD
OWNED/CONTROLLED
(2) UNDER CONTRACT/APPROVED
(3) VACANT
(4) INACTIVE
b. PRIVATE HOUSING
(1) ACCEPTABLY
HOUSED
(2) ACCEPTABLE
VACANT
13.
EFFECTIVE
14.
PROPOSED
15.
REMARKS
HOUSING
RENTAL
DEFICIT
PROJECT
DD FORM1513,NOY..
367
1. COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
COMMAND
5. AREA CONST
MALMSTROM AIR BASE
AIR FORCE SPACE
COST INDEX
MONTANA
COMMAND
1.16
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
Strength
OFF
ENL
CIV
OFF ENL
CIV
OFF
ENL
CIV
AS OF 30 SEP 04
494
3051
542
0
0
0
0
0
0
END FY 2009
494
3051
542
0
0
0
0
0
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
3,701
Inventory Total as of: (30 Sep 04)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2007)
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
TOTAL
4,087
4,087
505,493
0
68,971
136,191
14,189
0
724,844
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
QQQ£
PROJECT
TITLE
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing
(FY 2006)
COST DESIGN
SCOPE
$,000
296 UN
68,971
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing
487 UN
(FY 2007)
136,191
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
711-142
Construct Military Family Housing
52 UN
START
Aug-04
STATUS
CMPL
Jul-05
(FY08-11)
9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
10. AFSPC strategic missile base supporting the 341st Space Wing.
14,189
1,175
DD Form 1390,24 Jul 00
368
1
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
1
2. DATE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
1REPLACEFAMIL Y HOUSING
1 NZAS034007 1
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE, MONTANA
J6.
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
88741
CATEGORY CODE
7. PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
9. COST ESTIMATE
U/M
QUANTITY
ITEM
Military FamilyHousing
Dwellings
Other SpecialConstruction
SupportCosts:
Lot Costs
Site Improvements
$68,971
UNIT COST
COSTj$OOQL
LS
LS
45,509
(43,647 )
( 1,862 )
16,636
( 1,661 )
( 1,192 )
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
( 1,065 )
( 6,494 )
( 1,638 )
( 501 )
( 2,731 )
(696)
( 658 )
UN
UN
Landscaping
Utility Mains
Streets
Recreation
Demolition
Environmental
OtherSite Work
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
296
296
147,456
6,291
Subtotal
62,145
Contingency (5%)
Total ContractCost
SIOH (5.7%)
3,107
65,252
3,719
ProjectCost
68,971
Area CostFactor J1.l~
10. Descriptionof ProposedConstruction:Replace296housingunits.Includesdemolition,site clearing,
replacement/upgrade
of utility systemsand roads,and constructionof new multiplex units. Providesnormal
amenitiesto includeparking,air conditioning,exteriorpatiosandprivacyfencing,garages,neighborhood
playgrounds,andrecreationareas.Includesdemolition,asbestosandlead-basedpaintremoval. Special
constructionfeaturesincludepier andgradebeamfoundationsystemsfor problemsoils.
Programmed
Pavarades
Bedrooms ~
YS.E
E4-E6
E4-E6
E9
E9
2M
4
3
4
1,480
1,870
1,930
2,160
1,852
2,322
2,392
2,682
E9 Installation SNCO
4
2,350
2,912
Project
Cost Per
172
216
223
250
1.079
1.079
1.079
1.079
271
1.079
~
~
No
($000)
773
773
773
773
268
20
4
3
38,447
3,603
745
626
773
1
~
Totals:
Maximum size: E4-E6
Maximum size: E4-E6
2M Bedroom
4 Bedroom
11. REQUIREMENT: 1880 UN
DDFORM1391.DEC99
296
IQml
226
43,647
1600 NSF /2002 GSF /186 GSM
2090 NSF / 2592 GSF / 241 GSM
Maximum size: E9 3 Bedroom
Maximum size: E9 4 Bedroom
Maximum size: E9 Installation SNCO 4 Bedroom
PROJECT:R~ace Mili~
~
2150 NSF /2672 GSF /249 GSM
2480 NSF / 3072 GSF / 286 GSM
2480 NSF / 3072 GSF /286 GSM
ADEQUATE: 1097 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 783 UN
Fami~ Housing,296 units in Atlas Vill~e and W ashin~tonCircle.
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
369
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
1
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA.
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
14. PROJECT TITLE
MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE, MONTANA
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
1 2 DATE
1
6. CATEGORY CODE
1
REPLACE FAMIL Y HOUSING
7. PROJECT NUMBER
18. PROJECT COST ($000)
88741
711-142
NZAS034007
$68,971
REOUIREMENT:This projectis requiredto provide modemand efficient housing for military membersand
their dependentsstationedat MalmstromAFB. All units will meetwhole housestandardsandare
programmedin accordancewith the Housing CommunityProfile. Replacementhousingwill provide a safe,
comfortable,andappealingliving environmentcomparableto the off-basecivilian community.Of the 1412
housingunitsto be replacedin this multiphaseinitiative, 630 arecompleted,or includedin prior programs,
and486 will follow in subsequent
phases.The replacement
housingwill provide a modemkitchen,living
room, bedroomand bath configuration,with ample interiorand exteriorstorageanda singlecar garage.
Exteriorparking will be provided for a secondoccupantvehicleandguests.The basicneighborhoodsupport
infrastructurewill be upgradedto meetmodemhousingneeds.Neighborhoodenhancement
will include
landscaping,playgrounds,and recreationareas.
CURRENTSITUATION: This projectreplaces296 housingunits, which were constructedin 1961.These45
year-oldhousesareshowingthe effectsof ageandcontinuousheavyuse. They havehadno majorupgrades
sinceconstructionanddo not meetthe needsof today'sfamilies,nor do theyprovide a modemhome
environment.Roofs,walls, foundations,and exteriorpavementsrequiremajor repair or replacementdue to the
effectsof ageandthe environment.Roof structuresshowsignsof rot; leakshavemadealreadyinadequate
insulationlesseffective.Foundationandpavementsareshowingsignsoffailure dueto settlement.Plumbing
and electricalsystemsareantiquatedanddo not meetcurrentstandardsfor efficiency or safety.Housing
interiors generallyhaveinadequatestorageand counterspace,
cabinetsare old and countertopsand sinksare
badlyworn. Flooring throughoutthe houseis outdated,andcontainsevidenceof asbestos.Plumbingand
electricalsystemsareoutdatedanddo not meetmodembuilding codes.Thereis no GroundFault Interrupter
Circuit protectionand manyelectricaloutletslackgroundingprotection.Lighting andheatingsystems
throughoutthe housesare inefficientandrequirereplacement.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:The housingwill continueto be occupieduntil it becomestotally
uninhabitablebecauseadequate,
affordableoff-basehousingis not available.The currentHousingRequirements
andMarketAnalysis showsan on-basehousingdeficit of 59 units. Without this and subsequent
phasesof this
initiative, costly piecemealrepairswill continuewith no improvementin the living quality. .
ADDmONAL: Replace296housingunits. Includesdemolition,site clearing,replacement/upgrade
of utility
systemsand roads,and constructionof new multiplexunits.Providesnormalamenitiesto include parking,
heatingand air conditioning,appliances,exteriorpatiosand privacy fencing,garages,neighborhood
playgrounds,and recreationareas.Includesdemolition,asbestosandlead-basedpaintremoval.Special
constructionfeaturesincludepier andgradebeamfoundationsystemsfor problemsoils.This projectmeetsthe
criteria/scopespecifiedin the Air ForceFamilyHousingGuide.An economicanalysishasbeenprepared
comparingthe alternativesof new construction,improvement,leasingand statusquo operation.Basedon the
netpresentvaluesand benefitof respectivealternatives,new constructionwas found to be the most costeffective
alternativeoverthe life the project.The costof improvingexistingunitsis 83% of the costof replacingthese
units. Sincethis is replacementhousing,therewill be no increasein the studentpopulationandthereforeno
impacton local schooldistrict. The constructionagentfor this projectis the Army Corpsof Engineers,
resultingin SIOH costsof 5.7%.BaseCivil Engineer:Lt ColDavid J. Crow, (406)731-6188.
DDFORM1391C,DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDIf'lTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
370
~~
---~
-
,
MilITARY
FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION
1. DATE OF REPORT
2. FISCAL YEAR
July-o4
3. DOD COMPONENT
2006
REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL
DD-A&L(AR)1716
4. REPORTING INSTALLATION
AIR FORCE
a. NAME
b. LOCATION
5. DATA AS OF
MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE
MONTANA
Sep-o3
ANALYSIS
OF
REQUIREMENTS AND ASSETS
6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH
7.
PERMANENT
CURRENT
OFFICER
E9-E7
(a)
(b)
E6-E1
(c)
TOTAL
(d)
3,430
493
207
2,730
493
207
2,730
PROJECTED
OFFICER
E9-E7
(e)
(f)
E6-E1
(g)
493
207
2,730
493
207
2,730
TOTAL
h
PARTY PERSONNEL
8. GROSS FAMILY HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
9. TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY
HOUSED
(a + b + c)
a INVOLUNTARILY
SEPARATED
0
b. IN MILITARYHOUSINGTO BE
DISPOSED/REPLACED
0
0
8
288
0
0
26
C UNACCEPTABLYHOUSEDIN COMMUNITY
10. VOLUNTARY SEPARATIONS
11. EFFECTIVE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
12. HOUSING ASSETS
(a + b)
a. UNDERMILITARYCONTROL
(1) HOUSEDIN EXISTINGDOD
OWNED/CONTROLLED
(2) UNDERCONTRACT/APPROVED
(3) VACANT
(4) INACTIVE
b. PRIVATEHOUSING
(1) ACCEPTABLYHOUSED
(2) ACCEPTABLEVACANTRENTAL
13. EFFECTIVE HOUSING DEFICIT
14. PROPOSED PROJECT
15. REMARKS
DO FORM 1523,
NQV..
371
I
1. COMPONENT
J FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. DATE
AIR FORCE
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
COMMAND
5. AREA CONST
SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
COST INDEX
NORTH CAROLINA
0.82
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
Strength
OFF
ENL
CIV
OFF ENL
CIV
OFF
ENL
CIV
AS OF 30 SEP 03
617
4733 1007
7
1
0
0
0
0
END FY 2008
613
4606
938
7
1
0
0
0
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
4,107
Inventory Total as of: (30 Sep 03)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2007)
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
TOTAL
6,365
6,165
791,711
65,306
48,868
50,794
1,347
0
958,026
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
~
PROJECT TITLE
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph 9
(FY 2006)
SCOPE
255 UN
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph 10
227 UN
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
711-142
Replace Housing Maintenance Facility
LS
COST DESIGN
$.000
START
48,868 Sep-04
STATUS
CMPL
Jun-05
(FY 2007)
50,794
(FY08-11)
1,347
9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installatior
1,029
10. A fighter wing with 4 F-15E squadrons, including 2 which conduct all initial qualification training, and an Air
Force Reserve KC-135 air refueling wing.
DD Form 1390, 24 Jul 00
312
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
1
J 2 DATE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA.
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION,
4. PROJECT TITLE
SEYMOUR JOHNSONAIR FORCEBASE, NORTH
CAROLINA
REPLACEFAMIL Y HOUSING (pH 9)
1
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY CODE
88741
17. PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
VKAG056002R1
9. COST ESTIMATE
UIM
QUANTITY
ITEM
Military Family Housing
Dwellings
Other SpecialConstruction
SupportCosts:
Lot Costs
Site Improvements
Landscaping
Utility Mains
Streets
Recreation
Demolition
Environmental
OtherSite Work
UN
UN
1
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
UNIT COST
255
255
86,235
23,824
349
6,702
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
UN
LS
LS
$48,868
COST-1$0001
28,065
(21,990 )
(6,075 )
16,049
( 1,024)
( 1,521 )
( 657 )
( 4,005 )
( 1,010 )
( 1,109 )
( 2,339 )
( 1,210 )
(3,174)
Subtotal
Contingency (5%)
Total ContractCost
44 114
,
2,205
46,319
SIOH (5.5%)
2,547
ProjectCost
48,868
Area CostFactor (0.82)
10. Descriptionof ProposedConstruction:Demolish349 inadequatehousingunits with their associated
infrastructureand construct255 duplexanddetachedfamily housingunits with all necessaryamenitiesand
supportingfacilities. Projectincludessite preparation,attachedsingleanddoublecar garages,brick facing to the
eavesto achievearchitecturalcompatibilitycompliance,crawlspacesfor maintenanceaccess,noise controldue
to locationwithin the noisezone,hurricanewind-loadprovisionsdueto 110mph designwind requiredby the
building code,handicappedaccess,air conditioning,energyconservingfeatures,visitor parking, exteriorpatios
and privacy fencing,supportinfrastructureof roads,utilities, recreationand greenareas,landscaping,and
asbestos/lead
basedpaint removalonthe demolishedunits. Specialconstructionincludesbulk storage,porches,
patios,decks,etc.
Pavarades
E1-E3
E1-E3
E4-E6
E7-E8
01-03
Bedrooms
2M
3
4
3
3
Maximum size: E1-E3 2M Bedroom
Maximum size: E1-E3 3 Bedroom
Maximum size: E4-E6 4 Bedroom
Maximum size: E7-E8 3 Bedroom
DDFORM1391,DEC99
Programmed
~
~
1,180
1,310
1,570
1,500
1,500
1,480
1,630
1,950
1,860
1,860
§S:M
137
151
181
173
173
Project
Cost Per
0.763
0.763
0.763
0.763
0.763
~
No
($000)
773
773
773
773
773
179
18
1
42
15
14,463
1,603
107
4,286
1,531
Totals:
255
21,990
§S:M
~
IQ.tgl
1300 NSF /1630 GSF /151 GSM
1420 NSF /1760 GSF /164 GSM
1790 NSF 12220 GSF /206 GSM
1650 NSF /2050 GSF /190 GSM
PREVIOUS
EDInONSMAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
'.'"
",;
373
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
2. DATE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
SEYMOUR JOHNSONAIR FORCEBASE, NORTH
CAROLINA
REPLACEFAMIL Y HOUSING (pH 9)
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY CODE
88741
Maximum size: 01-03 3 Bedroom
11. REQUIREMENT: 2365 UN
711-142
7. PROJECT NUMBER
VKAG056002Rl
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
$48,868
1650 NSF /2050 GSF /190 GSM
ADEQUATE: 1749 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 616 UN
PROJECT:REPLACEFAMIL Y HOUSING (PHASE 9)
REQUIREMENT:This projectis requiredto provide modemand efficient housingfor military membersand
their dependents
stationedat SeymourJohnsonAFB. All unitswill meetmodemhousingstandardsand are
programmedin accordancewith the Housing CommunityProfile.The designwill provide a modemkitchen,
living room, family room, bedroom,and bath configuration,with ample interior and exteriorstorage.The
numberof bedroomswill rangefrom two (modified)to four bedrooms,as identified in the most recentHousing
Requirementsand MarketAnalysis.213 units will be providedwith a single-cargarageand exteriorparking for
a secondvehicle. 42 units will be provided with a double-cargarageand exteriorparking fora third vehicle.
Adequateinfrastructuresupportfor roadsandutilities shallalsobe provided.This is the ninth phaseof a
multiphaseinitiative to replace1687inadequatehousingunits with 1285modemhousingunits for Seymour
JohnsonAFB. The HousingCommunityProfile andHousingRequirements
and Market Analysisare elements
of the GeneralPlan for SeymourJohnsonAFB, and arethebasisfor this project.
CURRENTSmJATION: 349 existinghousingunits thatwereconstructedin 1958areto be demolishedand
255 units will be replaced.These46 year-oldunits showthe effectsof ageand heavyuse. Theyhavehad no
majorupgradessince construction,and theydo not meettheneedsof today'sfamilies, nor do theyprovide a
modemhomeenvironment.Thereare insufficientprovisionsfor handicappedpersons.The roof, wall,
foundation,and exteriorpavementsrequiremajor repair or replacement
dueto age.The plumbing and electrical
systemsareantiquatedanddo not meetcurrentstandardsfor efficiencyandsafety. Interiorsare generally
inadequateby modemcriteria. Bedroomsand bathroomsare smalland lack adequateclosetspace.Kitchens
have insufficientcabinets,storage,and counterspace.Lighting, heating,and air conditioning systemsrequire
upgradeandreplacement.The currentHousingRequirements
andMarketAnalysis andHousing Community
Profile renovationcostsexceedthe currentreplacementcost.The costto correctimminentproblemsexisting
with the inventory,spacedeficiencies,and modernizationrequirements
hasprovento be more costly thanthe
original vouchercostandthe capitalizationcombined.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:Units will continueto deterioraterapidly, resultingin increasingoperations,
maintenanceand repairto the governmentandinconvenience
to residents.Without this project,repairof these
units will continuein a costlypiecemealfashionwith little or no improvementin living quality.
ADDITIONAL: This projectmeetsthe criteria/scopespecifiedin the Air Force Family HousingGuide.An
economicanalysishasbeenpreparedcomparingthe alternativesof new construction,improvements,and status
quo operation.Basedonthe net presentvaluesandbenefitsof therespectivealternatives,replacement
constructionwas found to be the most costeffectiveoverthe life of the project.The demolitionof37% more
units thanarebeing built raisesthe costof demolitionto 8.21% of the dwelling cost.Sincethis is replacement
housing,therewill be no increasein the studentpopulationor impacton the ability of the local schooldistrict
to supportbasedependents.
The costof minimumimprovements
to existing units wasfound to exceed82% of
the costof this replacementproject.This projectprovidesa portionof the greenspaceand community
recreationfacilities appropriateto a housingareafor morethan5000personsand necessaryfor the development
andmaintenanceof the healthof personnelandfamilies.This requiresincreasingthe costfor recreationto the
high value.BaseCivil Engineer:Lt Col Lowell A. Nelson,(919)722-5142.
DO FORM 1391C, DEC 99
PREVIOUSEDITIONSMAY BE USED ImERNALLY UNnL EXHAUSTED
374
,
;
j
--~
MILITARY
FAMILY
HOUSING
JUSTIFICATION
1.
DATE
OF REPORT
2.
FISCAL
July-04
3.
DOD
AIR
5.
COMPONENT
FORCE
DATA
4.
REPORTING
a.
NAME
REPORT
CONTROL
SYMBOL
DD-A&L(AR)1716
INSTALLATION
b.
AS OF
YEAR
2006
SEYMOUR
JOHNSON
AIR FORCE
BASE
Phase
LOCATION
9
NORTH
CAROLINA
Dec-O3
ANALYSIS
CURRENT
OF
OFFICER
REQUIREMENTS
6.
TOTAL
7.
PERMANENT
8.
GROSS
9.
TOTAL
AND
PERSONNEL
(a)
(b)
E6-E1
(c)
TOTAL
(d)
OFFICER
(e)
E9-E7
(f)
E6-E1
(g)
TOTAL
(h)
STRENGTH
PARTY
FAMILY
ASSETS
PROJECTED
E9-E7
539
385
3,522
539
386
3,496
539
385
3,522
539
386
3,496
15
42
198
11
0
0
PERSONNEL
HOUSING
UNACCEPTABLY
REQUIREMENTS
HOUSED
(a + b + c)
a. INVOLUNTARILY SEPARATED
b IN MILITARY HOUSING TO BE
DISPOSED/REPLACED
C. UNACCEPTABLY
10.
VOLUNTARY
11.
EFFECTIVE
12.
HOUSING
HOUSED IN COMMUNITY
SEPARATIONS
HOUSING
ASSETS
REQUIREMENTS
(a + b)
a. UNDER MILITARY CONTROL
(1) HOUSED IN EXISTING DOD
OWNED/CONTROLLED
(2) UNDER CONTRACT/APPROVED
(3) VACANT
(4) INACTIVE
b. PRIVATE HOUSING
(1) ACCEPTABLY
HOUSED
(2) ACCEPTABLE
VACANT RENTAL
13.
EFFECTIVE
14.
PROPOSED
15.
REMARKS
HOUSING
DEFICIT
PROJECT
DD FORM lS23,NOV..
375
l
1. COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
INSTAllATION AND lOCATION
COMMAND
5. AREA CONST
GRAND FORKS AIR FORCE BASE
AIR MOBILITY COMMAND
COST INDEX
NORTH DAKOTA
0.95
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
Strength
OFF
ENl
CIV
OFF ENl
CIV
OFF
ENl
CIV
AS OF 30 SEP 05
330
2579
461
5
8
10
0
0
0
END FY 2010
325
2523
455
5
8
10
0
0
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
5,422
Inventory Total as of: (30 Sep 05)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2007)
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
TOTAL
3,393
3,326
1,367,000
29,700
86,706
59,914
1,515
82350
1,627,185
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
TITLE
(FY 2006)
COST DESIGN
.QQQ.£
PROJECT
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph J
300 UN
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph K
228 UN
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
711-142
Construct Housing Maintenance Facility
9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
10. An air refueling wing with four KC-135 squadrons.
SCOPE
$,000
86,706
START
Aug-04
STATUS
CMPl
Jun-05
(FY 2007)
59,914
(FY08-11)
lS
1,515
805
DD Form 1390,24 Jul 00
376
I
1. COMPONENT
I
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION
ANDLOCATION.
GRAND FORKS AIR FORCE BASE, NORm
DAKOTA
5. PROGRAM
ELEMENT
88741
1
1
2 DATE
PROJECT DATA.
4. PROJECT
TITLE
REPLACE FAMILY HOUSING PH J
1
6. CATEGORY
CODE
I s, PROJECT$86,706
COST($000)
7. PROJECT
NUMBER
711-142
JFSD200024
9. COSTESTIMATE
ITEM
UIM
Military Family Housing
Dwellings
Other Special Construct
(F oundations/Garages)
Support Costs:
Lot Costs
Site Improvements
QUANTITY
UN
UN
300
300
UNITCOST
COSTi$OO~
40,342
(36,552 )
( 3,790 )
121,840
12,633
LS
LS
37,782
(4,313 )
( 5,043 )
Landscaping
Utility Mains
Streets
Recreation
Demolition
Environmental
Other Site Work
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(2,102 )
( 9,843 )
( 2,437 )
( 1,594 )
( 5,086 )
(4,131 )
(3,041 )
Handicapped Adaptable Rqmts
UN
16
12,000
( 192 )
Subtotal
78,124
Contingency (5%)
3,906
Total Contract Cost
82 030
,
SIOH (5.7%)
4,675
Project Cost
86,706
Area Cost Factor ~0.9?l
10. Description of Proposed Construction: Replace 300 housing units. Site work improvements include
underground utilities, parking, landscaping, patios, privacy fencing, recreation, and community improvements.
Amenities include energy efficiency, heating, air conditioning, floor coverings, attached garages, storage, and at
least 16 units constructed as handicapped adaptable.Includes demolition of 168 surplus units and
environmental hazard remediation. Special construction includes removing unsuitable supporting soils, deeper
excavation, and backfill and compaction of propor soils.
Programmed
Pavarades
Bedrooms
~
Ys.E
E4-E6
2M
1,480
1,852
E4-E6
E4-E6
E7-E8
04-05
3
4
3
3
1,610
1,870
1,800
1,930
2,002
2,322
2,232
2,392
Project
Cost Per
172
0.855
186
216
208
223
0.855
0.855
0.855
0.855
~
Eg..QtQI
No
($000)
773
190
21,599
773
773
773
773
38
20
24
28
4,672
2,855
3,299
4,127
300
36,552
~
Totals:
Maximum size: E4-E6 2M Bedroom
1600 NSF 12002 GSF /186 GSM
Maximum size: E4-E6 3 Bedroom
Maximum size: E4-E6 4 Bedroom
Maximum size: E7 -E8 3 Bedroom
1720 NSF /2132 GSF /199 GSM
2090 NSF /2592 GSF /241 GSM
1950 NSF / 2422 GSF /225 GSM
Maximum size: 04-05
DO FORM 1391, DEC 99
3 Bedroom
~
IQml
2150 NSF /2672 GSF /249 GSM
PREVIOUSEDITIONSMAY BE USED INTERNALLYUNTIL EXHAUSTED
"377
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
I
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA.
1 2 DATE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
GRAND FORKSAIR FORCEBASE, NORTH
REPLACE FAMIL Y HOUSING PH J
DAKOTA
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
88741
11. REQUIREMENT: 1475 UN
16. CATEGORY CODE
711-142
ADEQUATE: 947 UN
17. PROJECT NUMBER
! 8. PROJECTCOST($000)
JFSD200024
$86,706
SUBSTANDARD: 528 UN
PROJECT:ReplaceMilitary FamilyHousingPhaseJ (CurrentMission).
REOUIREMENT: Projectwill provide modernand efficient housingfor military membersand their families
assignedat GrandForksAFB. All units will meet"whole house/neighborhood"standardsandprovide a safe,
comfortable,and appealingliving environmentcomparableto the off-basecivilian community.Projectis
programmedin accordancewith the HousingCommunityPlan and Family Housing MasterPlan. At least 16
units will be constructedashandicappedadaptable.Eachunit includesadditional28 net squaremeters(NSM)
authorizedfor recreationspaceat northerntier bases.This projectwill demolish168sUrplusunits,including
utilities, pavements,and environmentalhazardremediation.The numberof demolishedunits exceeds
replacementunits by 168;theseunitsare in the way of constructionandare surplusto our needs.
CURRENTSIl1JATION: This projectreplaceshousesconstructed1958-1959.The units areundersized,meet
few of the "whole house/neighborhood"
standards,
and showthe effectsof ageandcontinuousheavyuse.They
havehadno majorupgradessinceconstructionanddo not meettheneedsof today'sfamilies. Roofs,walls,
foundationsand exteriorpavementsrequiremajorrepair or replacementdueto the effects of age.Roof structures
showsignsof rot. Plumbing and electricalsystemsareantiquatedanddo not meetcurrentstandardsfor
efficiency or safety.Housing interiorsareinadequateby any moderncriteria. Bedroomsare smalland lack
closetspace.Bathroomsare small,fixturesareoutdatedandenergy-inefficient.Kitchenslack sufficientstorage
and counterspace,cabinetsareold and unsightly,andcountertopsand sinksare badly worn. Flooring
throughoutthe houseis outdatedand containsasbestos.Outletslackgroundingprotection,andthereis no
GroundFault Interruptercircuit protection.Lighting systemsare inefficient andrequirereplacement,and units
haveno air conditioning.The unitshaveno patio or backyardprivacy. Housinglacks additional28 netsquare
metersfor indoor recreationspaceauthorizedat northerntier bases.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Air Forcemembersandfamilies will continueto be inadequatelyhoused.
Low moraleand retentionproblemscanbe expectedsince comparable,
affordableoff-basehousingis not
available.Units will continueto deteriorateresultingin escalatingoperations,maintenanceand repair coststo
theGovernrnent.
ADDITIONAL: This project meetsthe criteria/scopespecifiedin the Air Force Family HousingGuide.An
economicanalysishas beenpreparedcomparingthe alternativesof new construction,improvement,leasingand
statusquo operation.Basedonthe net presentvaluesand benefitsof the respectivealternatives,new
constructionwas found to be the mostcosteffectivealternativeoverthe life of the project.The costof
improving existing unitsis 74% of the costof replacingtheseunits. Sincethis is replacementhousing,there
will be no increasein the studentpopulationandthereforeno impactonthe local schooldistrict. The
constructionagentfor this projectis the Army Corpsof Engineersresultingin SIOH costsof 5.7%. BaseCivil
Engineer:Lt Col PatrickF. Fogarty,(701)747-4769.
DDFORM1391C,DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
.378
..
I
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION
1. DATE OF REPORT
2. FISCAL YEAR
July-04
3. DOD COMPONENT
2006
REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL
DD-A&L(AR)1716
4. REPORTING INSTALLATION
AIR FORCE
a. NAME
5. DATA AS OF
b. LOCATION
GRAND FORKS AIR FORCE BASE
Phase J
NORTH DAKOTA
Oct-04
ANALYSIS
OF
REQUIREMENTS AND ASSETS
CURRENT
OFFICER
E9-E7
(a)
(b)
E6-E1
(c)
TOTAL
d
PROJECTED
OFFICER
E9-E7
(e)
(f)
E6-E1
(9)
TOTAL
6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH
7.
PERMANENT
316
240
2,139
311
242
2,120
316
240
2,139
311
242
2,120
28
24
248
0
0
163
PARTY PERSONNEL
8. GROSS FAMILY HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
9. TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY
HOUSED
(a + b + c)
3. INVOLUNTARilYSEPARATED
0
b IN MiliTARY HOUSINGTO BE
DISPOSED/REPLACED
C. UNACCEPTABLYHOUSEDIN COMMUNITY
10. VOLUNTARY
SEPARATIONS
11. EFFECTIVE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
12. HOUSING ASSETS
(a + b)
3. UNDER MiliTARY CONTROL
(1) HOUSEDIN EXISTINGDaD
OWNED/CONTROLLED
(2) UNDERCONTRACT/APPROVED
(3) VACANT
(4) INACTIVE
b. PRIVATEHOUSING
(1) ACCEPTABLYHOUSED
(2) ACCEPTABLEVACANTRENTAL
13. EFFECTIVE HOUSING DEFICIT
14. PROPOSED
PROJECT
15. REMARKS
DO FORM"13, NOV"
379
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
2. DATE
INSTAllATION AND lOCATION
COMMAND
5. AREA CONST
MINOT AIR FORCE BASE
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
COST INDEX
NORTH DAKOTA
1.09
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
Strength
OFF
ENl
CIV
OFF ENl
CIV
OFF
ENl
CIV
AS OF 30 SEP 04
604
4474
942
0
0
0
0
1
54
END FY 2009
605
4355
878
0
0
0
0
1
54
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
5,383
Inventory Total as of: (30 Sep 04)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2007)
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
None
1,709,149
9,500
44,548
114,474
0
41300
1,918,971
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
(FY 2006)
CATEGORY
COST DESIGN
QQQS
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
$.000
START
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph 12 223 UN
44,548 Aug-04
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph 13
TOTAL
6,075
5,893
490 UN
STATUS
CMPl
May-05
(FY 2007)
114,474
(FY08-11)
9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
1,549
10. A host bomb wing with B-52H aircraft, and an AF Space Command space wing with Minuteman III missiles.
DD Form 1390,24 Jul 00
380
"'"
1. COMPONENT
2 DATE
AIR FORCE
3. INSTAllATION
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
AND LOCATION
PROJECT DATA.
4. PROJECT TITLE
MINOT AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH DAKOTA
REPLACE MILITARY
FAMIL Y HOUSING PHASE
12
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY CODE
88741
7. PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
9. COST ESTIMATE
U/M
QUANTITY
ITEM
Military Family Housing
Dwellings
Support Costs:
Lot Costs
Site Improvements
$44,548
UNIT COST
COST $000
LS
LS
31,736
(31,736)
8403
,
(813)
( 1,400)
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
( 733 )
( 1,763 )
( 1,547 )
( 626 )
( 797 )
( 724 )
UN
Landscaping
Utility Mains
Streets
Recreation
Demolition
Environmental
6. PROJECT COST ($000)
NF069014
223
142,314
Subtotal
40,139
Contingency (5%)
2,006
Total Contract Cost
SIOH (5.7%)
42,145
2,402
Project Cost
44,548
Area Cost Factor 1.09
10. Description of Proposed Construction: Construct 223 housing units with all necessary supporting
facilities including: garages,patios, fencing, utilities, air conditioning, appliances, exterior storage, roads,
parking, sidewalks, playground, landscaping, and all other necessary support facilities. This project will
include demolition of 327 units with 223 new units being built.
Programmed
Pa}!orades
Bedrooms
N.QE
.G.QE
E1-E3
E1-E3
04-05
04-05
2M
4
3
4
1,480
1,870
1,930
2,160
1,852
2,322
2,392
2,682
Maximumsize: E1-E3 2M Bedroom
Maximumsize: E1-E3 4 Bedroom
Maximumsize:04-05 3 Bedroom
Maximumsize: 04-05 4 Bedroom
11. REQUIREMENT: 2514 UN
Project
~
~
172
216
223
250
1.014
1.014
1.014
1.014
CostPer
~
No
($000)
Un@
IQtg!
773
773
773
773
184
18
11
10
24,806
3,047
1,923
1,960
Totals:
223
31,736
1600NSF/2002 GSF/186 GSM
2090 NSF/2592 GSF/241 GSM
2150 NSF / 2672GSF/249 GSM
2480 NSF / 3072GSF / 286 GSM
ADEQUATE: 1644 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 870 UN
PROJECT: Replace Military Housing, Phase 12, (Current Mission)
REOUIREMENT: This project is required to provide modem and efficient housing for military members and
their dependants stationed at Minot AFB. All units will be new construction to provide a safe, comfortable,
and appealing living environment comparable to the off-base civilian community. This project is programmed
in accordance with the Housin Communi Plan. This is the twelfth of multi Ie hases to r lace 1,772
DDFORM1391,DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDInONSMAYBE USEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
","',981
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA.
2 DATE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
MINOT AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH DAKOTA
REPLACEMILITARY FAMILY HOUSING PHASE
12
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY CODE
7. PROJECT NUMBER
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
88741
711-142
QJVF069014
$44,548
in accordancewith the Housing ConununityPlan.This is the twelfth of multiple phasesto replace1,772
housingunits for basepersonnel.1059unitshave alreadybeenreplaced.The replacementhousingwill
provide a modemkitchen,living rooIn, and bath configurationwith ample interior and exteriorstorageplus an
additional300SF per unit to provide an indoorrecreationroom.Parking will be provided for a second
vehicle.The neighborhoodsupportinfrastructurewill be upgradedto meetmodemhousingneeds,to include
landscaping,playgroundsand recreationareas.
CURRENTSITUATION: This projectimprovesCapehart(not all units are Capehart)units built in 1962,
which areshowingthe effectsof ageandcontinuousheavyuse.Theyhavehad no major upgradessince
construction,do not meetthe needsof today'sfamily, nor do theyprovide a modemhomeenvironment.
Kitchensaretoo narrowand dark,anddo notprovideadequatecabinetand countertop space.The bathrooms
are very smalland in poor condition.Bathroomfixtures areoutdatedandinefficient. Lighting in hallways,
bathrooms,andbedroomsis inadequate.The exteriorsof theseunits lack landscapingand haveno covered
patio for protectionfrom the sun.Off streetparkingis severelylimited andtraffic flow in and aroundhousing
areasis inefficient.
IMP ACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Air Forcemembersand their families will continueto live in extremely
outdated,unsuitable,and unsatisfactoryhousing.The housingwill continueto deteriorate,resultingin
increasingandunacceptable
maintenancecostsandextremeinconvenienceto the occupants.Without this and
subsequent
phasesof this initiative, repairsof theseunits will continueata costly, piecemealfashion,with
little or no improvementin living quality.
ADDITIONAL: An economicanalysishasbeenperformedconsideringimprovement,replacement,leasing,and
statusquo operation.Basedon the new presentvaluesandbenefitsof the respectivealternatives,replacement
was found to be the mostcosteffective overthe life of the project.Improvementcostis 93% of the replacement
cost.This projectmeetsthe criteria/scopespecifiedin Part n of the Military Handbook1190,"Facility
PlanningDesignGuide". Sincethis is replacementhousing,therewill be no increasein the studentpopulation
or impactonthe local schooldistrict to supportbasedependents.
5.7% Supervision,Inspection,and Overhead
(SIOH) is beingprogranunedfor Army Corpsof Engineers.BaseCivil Engineer:Lt Col DarrenGibbs,DSN
453-2434.
DOFORM1391C,DEC99
PREVIOUS
EomONSMAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
382
".
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION
3. DOD COMPONENT
1. DATE OF REPORT
Jul-04
2. FISCAL YEAR
2006
REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL
DD-A&L(AR)1716
4. REPORTING INSTALLATION
AIR FORCE
a. NAME
5. DATA AS OF
b. LOCATION
MINOT AIR FORCE BASE
Phase 12
NORTH DAKOTA
Feb-04
ANALYSIS
CURRENT
OF
REQUIREMENTS AND ASSETS
PROJECTED
OFFICER
(a)
E9-E7
(b)
E6-E1
(c)
579
346
579
TOTAL
(d)
OFFICER
(e)
E9-E7
(1)
E6-E1
(g)
3,893
581
338
3,762
346
3,893
581
338
3,762
73
0
150
0
0
0
TOTAL
6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH
7.
PERMANENT
PARTY PERSONNEL
8. GROSS FAMILY HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
9. TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY
HOUSED
(a + b + c)
a.INVOLUNTARILYSEPARATED
b. IN MILITARY HOUSING TO BE
DISPOSED/REPLACED
C
UNACCEPTABLY
10. VOLUNTARY
HOUSED IN COMMUNITY
SEPARATIONS
11. EFFECTIVE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
12. HOUSING ASSETS
(a+ b)
336
a. UNDER MILITARY CONTROL
336
(1) HOUSED IN EXISTING DOD
OWNED/CONTROLLED
(2) UNDER CONTRACT/APPROVED
(3) VACANT
(4) INACTIVE
b. PRIVATE HOUSING
(1) ACCEPTABLY
HOUSED
(2) ACCEPTABLE
VACANT RENTAL
13. EFFECTIVE HOUSING DEFICIT
14. PROPOSED PROJECT
15. REMARKS
DD FORM 1523,NOV"
383
'q"'...
,-'
i
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
2. DATE
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
COMMAND
5. AREA CONST
CHARLESTON AIR FORCE BASE
AIR MOBILITY COMMAND
COST INDEX
SOUTH CAROLINA
0.94
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
Strength
OFF
ENL
CIV
OFF ENL
CIV
OFF
ENL
CIV
ASOF30SEP04
526
3216
622
11
39
5
357
1951
618
END FY2009
513
3333
620
11
39
5
357
1951
618
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
3,733
Inventory Total as of: (30 Sep 04)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2007)
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
.QQQ£
PROJECT TITLE
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph 4
1,168,947
55,900
15.935
0
1,172
62000
1.303,954
(FY 2006)
SCOPE
10 UN
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
None
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
711-142
Replace Housing Maintenance Facility
TOTAL
7,345
7,447
COST DESIGN
$.000
START
15.935 Aug-04
STATUS
CMPL
Jul-05
(FY 2007)
(FY08-11)
LS
1,172
9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
520
10. An airlift wing with four C-141/C-17 squadrons; an AFRC C-141/C-17 associate airlift wing; an ANG air
defense detachment with F-16 aircraft; and a combat camera squadron.
DD Form 1390,24 Jul 00
384
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA.
2 DATE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
CHARLESTONAIR FORCEBASE, SOUTH
CAROLINA
REPLACEFAMILY HOUSING PH 4
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY CODE
88741
7. PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
9. COST ESTIMATE
U/M
QUANTITY
ITEM
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
DKFX064012
Military Family Housing
Dwellings
SupportCosts:
Garages/Patios
StormDrainagelFloodControl
SanitarySewerSystem
WaterDistributionSystem
Sidewalks/Parking/Lighting
Site Improvements
Landscaping
Streets
Recreation
Demolition
Environmental
OtherSite Work
$15,935
UNIT COST
UN
10
201,800
EA
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
10
15,000
COST $000
2,018
(2,018 )
12,367
( 150 )
( 1,336 )
( 1,955 )
( 1,492 )
( 532 )
( 1,510 )
( 665 )
( 1,954)
( 643 )
( 1,082 )
( 68 )
(980)
Subtotal
Contingency (5%)
Total ContractCost
SIOH (5.5%)
14,385
719
15,104
830
ProjectCost
15,935
Area CostFactor 0.94
10. Descriptionof ProposedConstruction:Demolish94 surplusinadequateunitsandreplace10 single family
housing4 bedroomunits with all necessaryamenitiesandsupportingfacilities. Projectincludessite
preparation,attachedtwo car garages,air conditioning,parking,exteriorpatiosand privacy fencing,support
infrastructureof roads,utilities, recreationareas,landscaping,asbestos
removal,anddemolition. Project
includes1 GOQ (4 bedroom)and9 SOQs(4 bedroom).
Programmed
Pa~grades
Bedrooms
N.s.E
Y.s.E
06
07+
4
4
2,030
2,690
2,520
3,330
Project
~
.E.g.(;tQ[
234
309
Cost Per
.G.QM
1.081
1.081
773
773
Totals:
Maximum size: 06
Maximum size: 07+
4 Bedroom
4 Bedroom
11. REQUIREMENT: 2327 UN
No
Unj:t§.
($000)
IQtg1
9
1
1,760
258
10
2,018
2350 NSF / 2920 GSF /271 GSM
3270 NSF /4060 GSF /377 GSM
ADEQUATE: 2317 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 10 UN
PROJECT:REPLACE FAMILY HOUSING (PHASE4)
REQUIREMENT: Projectis requiredto provide modemand efficienthousingfor military membersand their
dependentsat CharlestonAFB. All units will meetmodemhousingstandardsand areprogrammedin
accordancewith the Housin Communi Profile. The desi will rovide a modemkitchen,livin room,
DDFORM1391,DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
385
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
1
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA.
1
2 DATE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
CHARLESTONAIR FORCEBASE, SOUTH
CAROLINA
REPLACE FAMIL Y HOUSING PH 4
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
1
6. CATEGORY CODE
17.
PROJECTNUMBER
1
8. PROJECT COST ($OOO)
88741
711-142
DKFX064012
$15,935
family room,bedroom,and bath configuration,with ampleinterior and exteriorstorage.Units will be four
bedroom.Units will be provided with a two car garageand additionalexteriorparking for guests.Adequate
infrastructuresupportfor roadsandutilities shallalsobe provided.Projectincludesthe demolitionof 94
surplusinadequateunits. The HousingCommunityProfile andHousingRequirementsand MarketAnalysis
arethe basisfor this project.
CURRENTSITUATION: After the mostrecentHousingRequirementsand MarketAnalysis,the basehas 746
surplusunits,and 9 inadequateSOQsand 1 inadequateGOQ.Of the surplusunits550 units areinadequate
and arescheduledfor demolition.This projectwill demolish94 units to accommodatea sensible
relocation/replacement
of the 9 SOQsand1 GOQ. Without relocation,the 10replacementunitswould be
awkwardlylocatedand inefficiently spreadout. The layoutwould be unacceptableandwould necessitateeven
moreinfrastructurework thanis currentlyneeded.Significantneighborhoodinfrastructurework is still needed
to meetand maintainAF standards.Many waterand sewerlines have not beenreplacedsinceoriginal
constructionin the early 1960s.Stormdrainsare ineffective,often with unsafeinlets. Commonareasand
recreationalareasaresubstandard
andlacking. Sidewalks,crosswalks,and streetlighting areneeded.
Substantialroadworkis required.Considerablelandscapingis neededto provide quality neighborhoodsthat
military membersand their families deserve.Many site improvementsare needed,including a long retaining
wall to preventerosionand structuraldamageto units alongthe AshleyRiver.
IMP ACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Withoutthis project,CharlestonAFB will not be ableto meetthe
requirementof 530adequateunits that meetAF standardsandhavethe requiredgradeand bedroommix.
ADDITIONAL: This projectmeetsthe criteriaof Air ForceFamily HousingGuidefor Planning,
Programming,Design,andConstruction.An economicanalysishasbeenpreparedcomparingthe alternativesof
replacement,improvement,and statusquo operation.Basedon the net presentvaluesand benefitof respective
alternatives,replacementwas foundto be the mostcosteffectivealternativeoverthe life of the project.
Improvementcostis 70% of replacement
cost.Sincethis is replacementhousingand demolition,there will be
no increasein the studentpopulationandthereforeno impactonthe local schooldistrict. The construction
agentfor this projectis the Air Forceresultingin SIOH costsof 5.5%.BaseCivil Engineer:Lt Col Kyle E.
Hicks, (843)963-4956.
DDFORM1391C, DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNnLEXHAUSTED
"
386
i
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION
1. DATE OF REPORT
2. FISCAL YEAR
July-04
3. DOD COMPONENT
DD-A&L(AR)1716
4. REPORTING INSTALlATION
AIR FORCE
5.
REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL
2006
a. NAME
DATA AS OF
b. LOCATION
CHARLESTON AIR FORCE BASE
Phase 4
SOUTH CAROLINA
Aug-04
ANALYSIS
CURRENT
OF
REQUIREMENTS AND ASSETS
6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH
7. PERMANENT
PROJECTED
OFFICER
(a)
E9-E7
(b)
E6-E1
(c)
540
305
540
TOTAL
d
OFFICER
(e)
E9-E7
(f)
E6-E1
(g)
2,992
542
305
3,006
305
2,992
542
305
3,006
10
0
0
0
0
80
TOTAL
PARTY PERSONNEL
8. GROSS FAMILY HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
9. TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY
HOUSED
(a+b+c)
a. INVOLUNTARILYSEPARATED
0
b. IN MILITARYHOUSINGTO BE
DISPOSED/REPLACED
C UNACCEPTABLYHOUSEDIN COMMUNITY
10. VOLUNTARY
SEPARATIONS
11. EFFECTIVE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
12. HOUSING ASSETS
(a+b)
a UNDERMILITARYCONTROL
(1) HOUSEDIN EXISTINGCOD
OWNED/CONTROLLED
(2) UNDERCONTRACT/APPROVED
(3) VACANT
(4) INACTIVE
b. PRIVATE HOUSING
(1) ACCEPTABLYHOUSED
(2) ACCEPTABLEVACANT RENTAL
13. EFFECTIVE HOUSING DEFICIT
14. PROPOSED
PROJECT
0
15. REMARKS
DD FORM1513,
NOV
..
381
~-
I
1. COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
COMMAND
5. AREA CONST
ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
COST INDEX
SOUTH DAKOTA
0.93
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
Strength
OFF
ENL
CIV
OFF ENL
CIV
OFF
ENL
CIV
AS OF 30 SEP 04
350
3123
771
0
11
1
1
1
54
END FY 2009
346
3072
708
0
11
1
1
1
54
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
26,066
Inventory Total as of: (30 Sep 04)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2007)
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
QQQg
PROJECT TITLE
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph 5
TOTAL
4,312
4,194
1,957,861
9,300
14,383
0
0
95000
2,076,544
(FY 2006)
SCOPE
60 UN
COST DESIGN
$,000
START
14,383 Aug-04
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
None
(FY 2007)
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
(FY08-11)
STATUS
CMPL
Aug-05
None
9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
10. A wing with two B-1 squadrons.
950
DD Form 1390,24 Jul 00
3"88
-
"'"
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
J
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA.
1 2 DATE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
ELLSWORTHAIR FORCEBASE, SOUTH
DAKOTA
REPLACEFAMILY HOUSING (pHASE 5)
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
16. CATEGORY CODE
88741
Military FamilyHousing
Dwellings
Other SpecialConstruction
SupportCosts:
Lot Costs
Site Improvements
Landscaping
Utility Mains
Streets
Recreation
Demolition
Environmental
OtherSite Work
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
FXBM994506
9. COST ESTIMATE
U/M
QUANTITY
ITEM
1
17. PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
UN
UN
60
60
$14,383
UNIT COST
COSTJJ:ooQL
11,256
(8,118 )
(3,138 )
1,703
( 98 )
( 99 )
( 110 )
( 302 )
( 237 )
( 364 )
( 113 )
(170)
(210)
135,300
52,300
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
Subtotal
Contingency (5%)
Total ContractCost
SIOH (5.7%)
12,959
647
13,606
775
ProjectCost
14,383
Area CostFactorLO.9:?l
10. Descriptionof ProposedConstruction:Replace60 housingunitsand demolishan additional56. Includes
demolition,site clearing,replacement/upgrade
of utility systemsand roads,designand constructsingleand
duplexfamily units with porches.Providesnormalamenitiesto include appliances,garages,parking,air
conditioning,patios with privacy fencing,neighborhoodplaygrounds,and recreationareas.Providesfire
detection.Otherspecialconstructionincludesbulk storage,porches,patios,decks,etc.
Programmed
Pavarades
Bedrooms
~
§.QE
E4-E6
4
1,570
1,950
Maximum
size:E4-E64 Bedroom
11. REQUIREMENT: 1865 UN
Project
~
~
181
CostPer
~!.!Dl!§.
0.967
773
Totals:
No
($000)
60
60
8,118
8,118
Ig!§l
1790NSF/2220GSF/206GSM
ADEQUATE: 1805 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 60 UN
PROJECT:ReplaceMilitary FamilyHousingPhase5 (CurrentMission)
REOUIREMENT:This projectis requiredto providemodemand efficienthousingfor military membersand
their dependentsstationedat EllsworthAFB. All units will meet"wholehouse"standardsandare
programmedin accordancewith the HousingCommunityPlan. Replacement
housingwill provide a safe,
comfortable,andappealingliving environmentcomparableto the off basecivilian community.This is .thefIfth
phaseof an initiative to provideadequatehousingfor basepersonnel.The replacementhousingwill provide a
modemkitchen,living room, family roomandbathconfiguration,with ample interior and exteriorstorage.A
doublecar garagewill be provided.Thebasicneighborhoods~rt infrastructurewill be ~ded
to meet
DDFORM1391,DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
389
""
1
I
1. COMPONENT
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION
ANDLOCATION
4. PROJECT
TITLE
ELLSWORTHAIR FORCE BASE, SOUTH
REPLACE FAMIL YHOUSING (PHASE 5)
DAKOTA
5. PROGRAM
ELEMENT
6. CATEGORYCODE
17. PROJECT
NUMBER
s. PROJECT
COST
($000)
88741
711-142
FXBM994506
$14,383
modemhousingneeds.Neighborhoodenhancements
will include landscaping,playgrounds,and recreation
areas.Properdisposalof asbestos
andlead-basedpaint is included.The expansiveclay soils require special
foundationconsiderations.AntiterriorismIForceProtectionmeasuresareincluded.Radonnaturallyoccursat
the projectsite.
CURRENTSITUATION: This projectreplaceshousingthatwasconstructedin 1961-1964.Units havehad
no majorupgradesor renovationsinceconstruction,and do not meettheneeds of today'sfamilies, nor do they
provide a modemhomeenvironment.Kitchensareundersizedanddo notprovide adequatecabinetand
countertopspace.The bathroomsare smalland in poor condition.Bathroomfixtures and lighting throughout
thehousesareoutdatedand energyinefficient. The exteriorof theseunits lack landscapingand recreationspace.
Thereareno garages,andvehiclesaresubjectedto extremelycold winters with no protectionfrom the
elements.Thereis inadequateexteriorstorage.Thereis no groundfault circuit interrupterprotectionas
requiredby currentnationalelectricalbuilding codes.Thereis no air conditioning.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:AF membersand their families will continueto live in inadequatehousing.
This 42 to 45 year old housingwill continueto deterioratewith age,resulting in increasingmaintenanceand
repaircoststo the governmentandinconvenienceto the occupants.Without this project,repairswill continue
in a costly, piecemealfashionwith little or no improvementin occupantquality of life. Thesedeficiencieswill
continueto adverselyaffectthe moraleof all personnelassignedto EllsworthAFB.
ADDITIONAL: An economicanalysishas beenpreparedcomparingthe alternativesof new construction,
revitalization,leasingandstatusquooperation.Basedon the net presentvaluesandbenefitsof the respective
alternatives,statusquo operationwasfound to be the most costefficient overthe life of the project. However,
this alternativeis unacceptable
becauseit doesnot repairthe deterioratedstructuresandwould force Air Force
personnelto continueto live in inadequate
housing.Improvementcostis 93%of replacementcost.Sincethis
is replacementhousingtherewill be no increasein the studentpopulationor impacton the ability of the local
schoolto supportbasedependents.
The constructionagentfor this projectis the Army Corps of Engineers,
resultingin SIOH costsof 5.7%.BaseCivil Engineer:Lt Col Gibbs (605)385-2658
1
DOFORM1391C. DEC99
I
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
""
390
MILITARY
FAMILY
HOUSING
JUSTIFICATION
1.
DATE
OF
REPORT
2.
FISCAL
July-o4
3.
DOD
AIR
5.
COMPONENT
4.
REPORTING
a.
NAME
FORCE
DATA
REPORT
CONTROL
SYMBOL
DD-A&L(AR)1716
INSTALLATION
b.
AS OF
YEAR
2006
ELLSWORTH
AIR
FORCE
BASE
Phase
LOCATION
5
SOUTH
DAKOTA
Nov-03
ANALYSIS
CURRENT
OF
OFFICER
REQUIREMENTS
AND
6.
TOTAL
PERSONNEL
7.
PERMANENT
8.
GROSS
FAMILY
9.
TOTAL
UNACCEPTABLY
(a)
(b)
E6-E1
(c)
TOTAL
(d)
OFFICER
(e)
E&-E7
(f)
E6-E1
(g)
STRENGTH
PARTY
337
285
2,778
3,400
337
286
2,759
337
285
2,778
3,400
337
286
2,759
0
0
60
0
0
0
PERSONNEL
HOUSING
3. INVOLUNTARILY
ASSETS
PROJECTED
E&-E7
REQUIREMENTS
HOUSED
(a + b + c)
SEPARATED
b. IN MILITARY HOUSING TO BE
DISPOSED/REPLACED
C. UNACCEPTABLY
10.
VOLUNTARY
11.
EFFECTIVE
12.
HOUSING
HOUSED IN COMMUNITY
SEPARATIONS
0
HOUSING
ASSETS
REQUIREMENTS
(a + b)
a. UNDER MILITARY CONTROL
(1) HDUSED IN EXISTING DOD
OWNED/CONTROLLED
(2) UNDER CONTRACT/APPROVED
(3) VACANT
(4) INACTIVE
b. PRIVATE HOUSING
(1) ACCEPTABLY
HOUSED
(2) ACCEPTABLE
VACANT RENTAL
13.
EFFECTIVE
14.
PROPOSED
15.
REMARKS
HOUSING
DEFICIT
PROJECT
DD FORM l5D. NOV"
391
TOTAL
(h)
1. COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
INSTALLATION AND lOCATION
COMMAND
5. AREA CONST
DYESS AIR FORCE BASE
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
COST INDEX
TEXAS
0.97
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
Strength
OFF
ENl
CIV
OFF ENl
CIV
OFF
ENl
CIV
AS OF 30 SEP 05
721
4600
745
79
86
3
1
10
43
END FY 2010
743
4691
682
79
86
3
1
10
43
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
6,405
Inventory Total as of: (30 Sep 05)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2007)
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
1,388,299
0
43,016
44,012
0
130100
1,605,427
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
~
PROJECT TITLE
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph 6
SCOPE
190 UN
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph 7
199 UN
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL
6,288
6,338
(FY 2006)
COST DESIGN
$,000
START
43,016 Aug-04
STATUS
CMPl
May-05
(FY 2007)
44,012
(FY08-11)
None
9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
1,071
10. A wing with three B-1 bomber squadrons, one of which is responsible for training all B-1 aircrews, and two
C-130 airlift squadrons in an AMC airlift group.
DD Form 1390, 24 Jul 00
392
1
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA.
3. INSTALlATION AND lOCATION
1
REPLACEFAMILY HOUSING PH 6
6. CATEGORY CODE
88741
DATE
14. PROJECT TITLE
DYESS AIR FORCEBASE, TEXAS
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
J2
17. PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
J
9. COST ESTIMATE
U/M
QUANTITY
ITEM
Military Family Housing
Dwellings
Other SpecialConstruction
SupportCosts:
Site Preparation
Site Improvements
Landscaping
Utility Mains
Streets
Recreation
Demolition
OtherSite Work
18. PROJECT COST ($000)
FNWZ063001
UN
UN
190
190
$43,016
UNIT COST
COST~$OO~
25,838
(23,788 )
(2,050)
12,920
( 547 )
( 1,187)
( 879 )
(3,431 )
(3,915 )
( 599 )
( 1,996 )
( 366 )
125,200
10,789
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
1S
LS
LS
Subtotal
38,758
Contingency (5%)
Total ContractCost
SIOH (5.7%)
1,937
40,695
2,319
ProjectCost
43,016
Area CostFactor (0.97)
1O.Descriptionof ProposedConstruction:Replace190singleand multiplex family housingunits with all
necessaryamenitiesincludingsoundreductionasneededandsupportingfacilities. Projectincludessite
preparation,attachedgarages,air conditioning,vehicle parking,exteriorpatiosand privacy fencing, support
infrastructureof roadsand utilities,neighborhoodplaygrounds,recreationareas,bridges,effluent water for
irrigation, and all landscaping.Includesdemolitionof 190singleand multiplexhousingunits, site demolition
and asbestosremoval. Specialconstructionfeaturesinclude brick exteriorwalls,doublecar garagesand rib-mat
concreteslabfoundations.
Pavgrades
E4-E6
Bedrooms
3
Programmed
N.s.E
.G..$E
1,310
1,630
~
151
Project
EgJ;;tQr
0.97
Cost Per
~
773
E4-E6
E7-E8
4
3
1,570
1,500
1,950
1,860
181
173
0.97
0.97
773
773
E7-E8
4
1,730
2,150
200
0.97
773
Totals:
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
size:
size:
size:
size:
E4-E6 3 Bedroom
E4-E6 4 Bedroom
E7-E8 3 Bedroom
E7-E8 4 Bedroom
11. REQUIREMENT: 2920 UN
1420
1790
1650
2020
NSF
NSF
NSF
NSF
/1760
/2220
/2050
/2500
ADEQUATE: 2531 UN
GSF
GSF
GSF
GSF
/164
/206
/190
/232
No
J,J:nj.t§.
95
47
27
21
190
($000)
IQtgl
10,756
6,379
3,503
3,150
23,788
GSM
GSM
GSM
GSM
SUBSTANDARD: 389 UN
PROJECT:ReplaceMilitary Farni!LHousingPhase6 (CurrentMissioI!2:
DDFORM1391,DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
,393I
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA'
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
DYESSAIR FORCEBASE, TEXAS
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
2 DATE
6. CATEGORY CODE
REPLACEFAMIL Y HOUSING PH 6
7. PROJECT NUMBER
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
88741
711-142
FNWZ063001
$43,016
REQUIREMENT:This projectis requiredto provide modemand efficient housing for military membersand
their dependents
stationedatDyessAFB. All units will meetmodemhousingstandardsand areprogrammed
in accordancewith the HousingCommunityProfile. The housingwill provide a safe,comfortable,and
appealingliving environmentcomparableto the off-basecivilian community.The designwill provide a
modemkitchen,living room, family room, bedroomandbathconfiguration,with ample interior and exterior
storage.The numberof bedroomswill rangefrom threeto four,asidentified in the most recenthousing
requirementsand marketanalysis.Units will be providedwith an attachedgarageand exteriorvehicleparking.
Land areawill be usedfor adequateinfrastructurerequirements(roads,recreationareas,utilities). This is the
sixthphaseof a multiphaseinitiative to replaceall substandard
housingunits at Dyess,AFB. Replacementof
all supportingfacilities is required.To supportthe wholeneighborhoodconcept,new roads,utility systems,
neighborhoodplaygrounds,recreationareas,andarealandscapingand lighting mustbe installed. Special
constructionincludesbrick, which is standardin this areabecauseof its durability underlocal climate
conditions(severetemperatureextremes,driving hail storms,andhigh solar radiation),low maintenance,and
otherlife cycle considerations.Both materialsand laborarereadilyavailable,resultingin minimal increasein
initial cost.Resultingappearance
is commensurate
with localneighborhoods.
The rib-mat foundationis
requireddueto severe,highly expansiveclay soil conditions.Wetand dry cycles typical of the southwest
causesubstantialsoil heaving.This could causecrackingin buildingsthatdo not havethe appropriate
foundation.
CURRENTSITUATION: Existing family housingunitswereconstructedin 1957.Theseunits havehad no
comprehensive
upgradeprogramsince construction,and theydo not meetthe needsof today'smilitary families,
nor do theyprovide a modemhomeenvironment.The existingjalousiewindows areoriginal. Theyare
difficult to open,drafty, andlatchesor cranksare frequentlybroken.Addition of stormwindows 26 yearsago
makeswindows evenmore difficult to open,andresultsin unnecessary
heatingand air conditioning costsin the
springand fall, as well asreducedindoor air quality. TheseCapehartunitswere constructedwith one
bathroom,which is smalland lacksadequatelinen closetspace.Kitchenshave insufficient cabinets,storage
and counterspace.Lighting, heatingandair-conditioningsystemsrequireupgradeandreplacement.
Plumbingand electricalsystemsareantiquatedanddo not meetcurrentstandardsfor efficiency andsafety.
Original agedtwo-wire, ungroundedelectricalwiring is causingincreasedfaultsand potentialfor fIre and safety
problems.The existing under-slabpiping systemsareold anddeteriorated.Frequencyof leakingpipes under
the concretefloor slabis increasing.Roof, wall, foundationsandexteriorpavementsrequiremajor repair or
replacementdueto age.SevereTexasweatherand highly expansiveclay soil conditionshavean adverseaging
effect onthe family housingunits. The built-up roofmg systemon mosthousingunit carportsis old and
deteriorated.The membranefelts are cracking,blistering,andwrinkling. Termite damageto family housing
units is extensive.The existingconcretesidewalksanddrivewaysarecrackingand lifting creatingtripping
hazards.The soffits and fasciaon the family housingunitsaredeterioratingandneedreplacement.The shingle
roofs areclawedandwarping.
IMP ACT IF NOr PROVIDED:Dyesswill continueto spendscarceMFH maintenanceand repairdollars
trying to extendthe life of thesesubstandardfamily housingunits.Military personneland their dependents
will be requiredto occupyinadequateandsubstandard
housing.The effectof living in a poorhousing
environmentwill be detrimentalto moraleandwelfareof the military and family members.
ADDmONAL: A rateof 5.7%hasbeenusedfor supervision,inspection,andoverheadfor using the Army
Corpsof Engineers.This projectmeetsthe criteria/scopespecifiedin PartII of Military Handbook1190,
Facility Planningand DesignGuide.The local schoolauthorityindicatesa capabilityexiststo accepttheincreasein the studentpopulationgeneratedby this project.An economicanalysishasbeenpreparedand found
that replacementis the mostcosteffectiveoption.The Improvementcostis morethan 100%of the replacement
cost.No additionalschoolconstructionwill be re uired. Commander,
7th Civil En ineerS uadron:Lt Col
DOFORM1391C.DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
394
...,.,
",""
,...
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
J
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
DYESS AIR FORCEBASE, TEXAS
5. PROGRAMELEMENT
16. CATEGORY CODE
88741
711-142
DarrenR. Daniels,(325)696-2250.
DDFORM1391C,DEC99
1
2. DATE
J4. PROJECTTITLE
REPLACEFAMIL Y HOUSING PH 6
17. PROJECT NUMBER
1
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
FNWZ063001
$43,016
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDItfTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
395
---
l
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION
1. DATE OF REPORT
2. FISCAL YEAR
July-O4
3. DOD COMPONENT
REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL
DD-A&L(AR)1716
4. REPORTING INSTALlATION
AIR FORCE
5.
2006
a. NAME
DATA AS OF
b. LOCATION
DYESS AIR FORCE BASE
Phase 6
TEXAS
Dec-03
ANALYSIS
OF
REQUIREMENTS AND ASSETS
6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH
7. PERMANENT
CURRENT
OFFICER
E9-E7
(a)
(b)
E6-E1
(c)
TOTAL
(d)
PROJECTED
OFFICER
E9-E7
(e)
(f)
E6-E1
(g)
681
427
3,996
681
434
4,052
681
427
3,996
681
434
4,052
TOTAL
(h)
PARTY PERSONNEL
8. GROSS FAMILY HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
392
9. TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY
a
INVOLUNTARILY
b IN MILITARY
HOUSED
(a + b + c)
SEPARATED
HOUSING TO BE
DISPOSED/REPLACED
C. UNACCEPTABLY
10. VOLUNTARY
0
48
0
0
HOUSED IN COMMUNITY
SEPARATIONS
11. EFFECTIVE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
12. HOUSING ASSETS
(a + b)
a. UNDER MILITARY CONTROL
(1) HOUSED IN EXISTING DOD
OWNED/CONTROLLED
(2) UNDER CONTRACT/APPROVED
(3) VACANT
(4) INACTIVE
b. PRIVATE HOUSING
(1) ACCEPTABLY
HOUSED
(2) ACCEPTABLE
VACANT RENTAL
13. EFFECTIVE HOUSING DEFICIT
14. PROPOSED
PROJECT
15. REt.IARKS
DD FORM '523, NOV"
'396
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
COMMAND
RAMSTEIN AIR BASE
UNITED STATES AIR
GERMANY
FORCES EUROPE
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
Strength
OFF
ENL
CIV
OFF ENL
CIV
AS OF 30 SEP 04
1443
6984 2885
66
946
124
END FY 2009
1471
7040 2894
66
946
124
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
3,187
Inventory Total as of: (30 Sep 04)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2007)
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
2. DATE
5. AREA CONST
COST INDEX
1.22
SUPPORTED
OFF
ENL
CIV
302
0
0
302
0
0
TOTAL
12,750
12,843
5,320,630
358,600
62,952
64,234
96,453
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
496930
6,399,799
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
.QQQ£
PROJECT TITLE
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph C
(FY 2006)
SCOPE
101 UN
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph 0
101 UN
COST DESIGN
$.000
START
62,952 Aug-04
STATUS
CMPL
Apr-05
(FY 2007)
64,234
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
(FY08-11)
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing
101 UN
51,060
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing
73 UN
45,393
9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
2,585
10. A host airlift wing supporting a C-130E squadron, a C-9A squadron and a squadron composed of C-20A,
and C-21A aircraft; Headquarters, United States Air Forces in Europe and Headquarters, Allied Air Forces
Central Europe.
DO Form 1390,24 Jul 00
397
--
...
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
I
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA'
RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, GERMANY
J6.
1
CATEGORY CODE
88741
2 DATE
j 4. PROJECTTITLE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
1
REPLACEFAMIL Y HOUSING, PH C
7. PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
9. COST ESTIMATE
U/M
QUANTITY
ITEM
Military Family Housing
Dwellings
OtherSpecialConstruction
SupportCosts:
Site Improvements
$62,952
UNIT COST
COSTJ!oo~
LS
37,639
(20,557 )
(17,082)
18,656
( 2,040 )
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(881 )
(5,371 )
( 1,355 )
( 414 )
( 2,258 )
( 1,622 )
(4,715)
UN
UN
Landscaping
Utility Mains
Streets
Recreation
Demolition
Environmental
OtherSite Work
18. PROJECT COST ($000)
TYFR064130
Subtotal
Contingency (5%)
Total ContractCost
SIOH (6.5%)
101
101
203,535
169,129
.56,295
2,814
59,109
3,842
ProjectCost
62,952
Area CostFactor (l.2:?l
10. Descriptionof ProposedConstruction:Demolish270and construct101 multiplex family housingunits
with all necessaryamenitiesandsupportingfacilities. Projectincludessite preparation,attachedsingle car
garages,energyconservingfeatures,parking, exteriorpatiosandprivacy fencing, supportinfrastructureof roads,
utilities, recreationareas,landscaping,asbestosremoval,anddemolition.Specialconstructionfeaturesinclude a
onecar garagefor eachunit, masonry/concrete
wall construction,tile roofs,and handicapaccessibilityfor 3
units. Othersite work includesparking lots,pedestrianwalks,boundarybuffers in housingarea.
Programmed
Pa~grades
Bedrooms
01-03
04-05
04-05
06
07+
4
3
4
4
4
Project
N.s.E
.G.SE
Q..$..M ~
1,730
1,630
1,860
2,030
2,690
2,150
2,020
2,310
2,520
3,330
200
188
215
234
309
1.22
1.22
1.22
1.22
1.22
Cost Per
~
784
784
784
784
784
Totals:
Maximum size: 01-03
4 Bedroom
Maximum size: 04-05
3 Bedroom
1850 NSF /2300 GSF /214 GSM
Maximum size: 04-05 4 Bedroom
Maximum size: 06 4 Bedroom
Maximum size: 07+ 4 Bedroom
2180 NSF /2700 GSF /251 GSM
2350 NSF /2920 GSF /271 GSM
3270 NSF /4060 GSF /377 GSM
11. REQUIREMENT: 6988 UN
No
~
I.9..tgl
10
28
35
26
2
101
1,913
5,035
7,198
5,819
592
20,557
2020 NSF /2500 GSF /232 GSM
ADEQUATE: 6516 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 472 UN
PROJECT:ReplaceFamilyHousin~..{!>hase
C). Specialconstructionfeaturesinclude a onecar~ar~
DDFORM1391,DEC99
($000)
for each
PREVIOUS
EDmONSMAYBEUSEDINTERNAllYUNTILEXHAUSTED
398
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA'
3. INSTAlLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, GERMANY
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
2 DATE
6. CATEGORY CODE
REPLACEFAMILY HOUSING, PH C
7. PROJECT NUMBER
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
88741
711-142
TYFR064130
$62,952
unit, masonry/concrete
wall construction,tile roofs, andhandicapaccessibilityfor 3 units.
REOUIREMENT: Projectis requiredto provide modemand efficienthousingfor military membersand their
dependentsat RamsteinAB, Germany.All units will meetmodemhousingstandardsand areprogrammedin
accordancewith the Housing CommunityProfile. The designwill provide a modemkitchen,living room,
family room,bedroom,and bathconfiguration,with ampleinteriorand exteriorstorage.The number of
bedroomswill rangefrom two to four, asidentified in the mostrecentHousingRequirementsand Market
Analysis. Units will be provided with a single-cargarageand exteriorparking for a secondvehicle.Adequate
infrastructuresupportfor roadsandutilities shallalsobe provided.This is the phaseC of a mu1tiphase
initiative to replacean additional101 housingunits for RamsteinAB. The HousingCommunityProfile and
HousingRequirementsand MarketAnalysisare elementsof the GeneralPlanfor RarnsteinAB, and arethe
basisfor this project.
CURRENTSITUAllON: Theseexistinghousingunitswereconstructedin the 1950s.They showthe effects
of ageand heavyuse.Theyhavehadno majorupgradessinceconstruction,and theydo not meetthe needs of
today'sfamilies,nor do they provide a modemhomeenvironment.The roof, walls,foundations,and exterior
pavementsrequire major repair or replacementdue to age.The plumbing and electricalsystemsare antiquated
anddo not meetcurrentstandardsfor efficiencyand safety.Interiorsare generallyinadequateby modemcriteria.
Bathroomsare smalland lack adequateclosetspace.Kitchenshaveinsufficient cabinets,storage,and counter
space.Lighting andheatingsystemsrequireupgradeandreplacement.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:Units will continueto deterioraterapidly, resultingin increasingoperations,
maintenanceand repairto the governmentandinconvenienceto residents.Without this project,repair ofthese
units will continuein a costlypiecemealfashionwith little or no improvementin liVing quality.
ADDlnONAL: This projectmeetsthe criteria/scopespecifiedin the Air ForceFamily HousingGuide.All
units will meetmodemhousingstandards.An economicanalysishasbeenpreparedcomparingthe alternatives
of new construction,improvement,leasingandstatusquo operation.Basedonthe net presentvaluesand
benefit ofrespectivealternatives,new constructionwasfound to be the most costeffectivealternativeoverthe
life of theproject. The costof improvingexistingunitsis 80% of the costof replacingtheseunits. Sincethis is
a replacementhousing,therewill be no increasein the studentpopulationandthereforeno impact on local
schooldistrict. The constructionagentfor this projectis the Army Corpsof Engineersresultingin 6.5% SIOH
costs.BaseCivil Engineer:Col CarlosR. Cruz-Gonzales,
314-480-6228FOREIGNCURRENCY: FCF
BudgetRateUsed: EURO-DOLLAR .8785
DOFORM1391C,DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
399
MILITARY
FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION
1. DATE OF REPORT
2. FISCAL YEAR
July-04
3. DOD COMPONENT
REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL
2006
DD-A&L(AR)1716
4. REPORTING INSTALLATION
AIR FORCE
a. NAME
b. LOCATION
5. DATA AS OF
RAMSTEIN AIR BASE
Phase C
GERMANY
Oct-03
ANALYSIS
CURRENT
OF
REQUIREMENTS AND ASSETS
6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH
7.
PERMANENT
PROJECTED
OFFICER
(a)
E9-E7
(b)
E6-E1
(c)
TOTAL
(d)
OFFICER
(e)
E9-E7
(f)
E6-E1
(9)
TOTAL
(h)
2,496
1,515
10,096
14,107
2,496
1,515
10,096
14,107
2,496
1,515
10,096
14..107
2,496
1,515
10,096
14,107
1,858
1,341
5193
8,392
1,858
1341
5193
8392
282
205
917
1,404
1,576
1,136
4,276
6,988
1,136
4,276
6,735
366
1,797
2,433
366
1,797
PARTY PERSONNEL
8. GROSS FAMILY HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
9. TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY
HOUSED
(a+b+c)
a. INVOLUNTARILYSEPARATED
0
b IN MILITARYHOUSINGTO BE
DISPOSED/REPLACED
C UNACCEPTABLYHOUSEDIN COMMUNITY
0
10. VOLUNTARY
0
0
0
0
SEPARATIONS
11. EFFECTIVE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
12. HOUSING ASSETS
(a + b)
a UNDER MILITARYCONTROL
(1) HOUSEDIN EXISTINGDOD
OWNED/CONTROLLED
(2) UNDERCONTRACT/APPROVED
(3) VACANT
(4) INACTIVE
b. PRIVATEHOUSING
(1) ACCEPTABLYHOUSED
(2) ACCEPTABLEVACANT RENTAL
0
13. EFFECTIVE HOUSING DEFICIT
0
14. PROPOSED
PROJECT
101
0
0
15. REMARKS
DO FORM1523.NOV"
"400
.I
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
INSTALLATION AND lOCATION
COMMAND
SPANGDAHlEM AIR BASE
UNITED STATES AIR
GERMANY
FORCES EUROPE
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
Strength
OFF
ENl
CIV
OFF ENl
CIV
AS OF 30 SEP 04
360
4157
778
0
0
0
END FY 2009
365
4301
781
0
0
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
1,377
Inventory Total as of: (30 Sep 04)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2007)
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
2. DATE
5. AREA CONST
COST INDEX
1.23
SUPPORTED
OFF
ENl
CIV
1
0
0
1
0
0
TOTAL
5,296
5,448
2,306,551
133,000
45,385
34,346
48,311
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
0
2,567,593
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
~
PROJECT TITLE
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph 1
(FY 2006)
SCOPE
79 UN
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph 2
60 UN
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing
94 UN
COST DESIGN
$,000
START
45,385 Aug-04
STATUS
CMPl
May-05
(FY 2007)
34,346
(FY08-11)
48,311
9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
10. A USAFE installation that is home to the largest fighter operation in Germany. A host Fighter Wing
commands three fighter squadrons and an air control squatron flying F-16 C&Ds and OA/A-10s.
758
DD Form 1390, 24 Jul 00
401
--
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA.
2 DATE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
SPANGDAHLEMAIR BASE, GERMANY
REPLACEMILITARY FAMILY HOUSING, PHASE
1
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY CODE
88741
7. PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
9. COST ESTIMATE
U/M
QUANTITY
ITEM
Military FamilyHousing
Dwellings
RenewableEnergySource
OtherSpecialConstruction
SupportCosts:
CommunicationConnections
Lot Costs
Site Improvements
Landscaping
Utility Mains
Streets
Recreation
Demolition
Environmental
OtherSite Work
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
VYHK064000
UN
UN
UN
$45,385
UNIT COST
79
79
79
COST $000
24,683
( 14,325)
( 1,516 )
( 8,842 )
15,903
( 450 )
(901 )
( 2,290 )
( 578 )
( 3,850 )
( 1,250 )
( 272 )
( 1,481 )
( 1,064 )
(3,767)
181,329
19,190
111,924
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
Subtotal
Contingency (5%)
Total ContractCost
SIOH (6.5%)
40,586
2,029
42,615
2,769
ProjectCost
45,385
Area CostFactor 1.23
10. Descriptionof ProposedC'onstruction:Construct79 single/multiplexfamily housingunits with all
necessaryamenitiesandsupportingfacilities. Projectincludessitepreparation,energyconservingfeatures,
parking,exteriorpatiosand privacy fencing,supportinfrastructureof roads,utilities, recreationareasand
landscaping.Work includessolar/renewableenergyfeatures(solarpanelsonroof) and specialconstruction
features(garages,tile/slateroofs,andfootings for problemsoils).Includesdemolitionof 126units, asbestos
andlead-basedpaint abatement.
Programmed
Paygrades
E4-E6
E4-E6
E7-E8
E7-E8
06
06 Installation COR
Bedrooms
3
4
3
4
4
4
Project
Cost Per
No
NSE
.G..S.E
.G.SM
EgJ;;tQr
.G.SM
Unit§.
1,310
1.570
1,500
1,730
2.030
2.230
1,630
1.950
1.860
2,150
2,520
2,770
151
181
173
200
234
257
1.279
1.279
1.279
1.279
1.279
1.279
784
784
784
784
784
784
18
30
12
12
6
1
2.726
5.445
2.082
2.407
1.408
257
79
14.325
Totals:
Maximum size: E4-E6 3 Bedroom
Maximum size: E4-E6 4 Bedroom
Maximum size: E7-E8 3 Bedroom
Maximum size: E7-E8 4 Bedroom
DDFORM1391,DEC99
($000)
19m!
1420 NSF /1760 GSF /164 GSM
1790 NSF /2220 GSF /206 GSM
1650 NSF /2050 GSF /190 GSM
2020 NSF /2500 GSF /232 GSM
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
402
~..-
,
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA.
2 DATE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
SPANGDAHLEM AIR BASE, GERMANY
REPLACEMILITARY FAMILY HOUSING, PHASE
1
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
88741
Maximum size: 06
6. CATEGORY CODE
4 Bedroom
VYHK064000
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
$45,385
2350 NSF / 2920 GSF / 271 GSM
Maximum size: 06 Installation COR 4 Bedroom
11. REQUIREMENT: 2039 UN
7. PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
2350 NSF /2920
ADEQUATE: 1806 UN
GSF /271 GSM
SUBSTANDARD: 233 UN
PROJECT:REPLACE FAMILY HOUSINGUNITS, PHASE I (CURRENTMISSION)
REQUIREMENT: Projectis requiredto provide modemand efficienthousing for military membersand their
dependents
stationedat Spangdah1em
AB, Germany.All units will meet"whole house"standardsandare
programmedin accordancewith the Housing CommunityProfile. The designwill provide a modemkitchen,
living room, family room, bedroomand bath configuration,with ampleinterior and exteriorstorage.The
numberof bedroomswill rangefrom threeto four, asidentified in the most recentHousingRequirementsand
MarketAnalysis.Units will be providedwith a single cargarageand exteriorparking for a secondoccupantcar
andguests.Solarpanelswill be installedonthe roof of eachbuilding aspart of the basewideenergy
conservation/renewable
initiatives.Thebasicneighborhoodsupportinfrastructurewill be upgradedto meet
modemhousingneeds.Neighborhoodenhancement
will include landscaping,playgrounds,and recreation
areas.This is the first phaseof a multiphaseinitiative to replace233 housingunits for Spangdahlem
AB,
Germany.The Housing CommunityProfile andHousingRequirements
and Market Analysis are elementsof
the GeneralPlan for Spangdahlem
AB, andarethebasisfor this project. Higher supportcostsfor site
improvements,utility mainsand streetsarebecausepartof thehousingreplacementis locatedwithin an
undevelopedsectionof the housingarea.
CURRENT SITUAnON: Currenthousingbuildings consistof 18 stairwell units, built in 1955.Theseunits
havehad no majorupgradesin the last 49 yearsand showthe affectsof ageandcontinuousheavyuse.They do
not meetcurrentantiterrorism/forceprotection(A TIFP) standards,
and areas muchas38% lessthantoday's
standardson size.Roofs, walls, foundations,and exteriorpavements
require major repair or replacementdueto
the effectsof ageandthe environment.Roof structuresarerotting; leakshavemadealreadyinadequate
insulationlesseffective andwalls discolored.Foundationsand pavementsarefailing dueto settlement.
Plumbingand electricalsystems,to includepublic announcement
systems,areantiquatedanddo not meet
currentstandardsfor efficiency or safety.Housinginteriorsareinadequatefor storageand counterspace,
cabinets
areold and countertopsand sinksarebadlyworn. Flooring throughoutthe 18 unit buildings is outdatedand
haveasbestos.Lighting systemsthroughoutthe unitsare inefficientanddo not meetrequirements.This
projectwill demolish126housingunits (7 buildings).
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: If this projectis not executed,structuraldeteriorationwill continueunabated.
Major morale problemswill continueto persist.Somepeoplewill continueto occupyinadequatehousing
unitswhile otherswill live in newlyrenovatedunits.The inadequatehousingwill continueto be occupied
sinceadequate,affordableoff-basehousingis not available.Inadequatefamily housingwill havea negative
affect on retaining AF members.
ADDITIONAL: This projectis not eligible for the NorthAtlantic Treaty Organization(NATO) security
investmentprogram.This projectmeetsthe criteriaspecifiedin the Air Force Family HousingGuide for
Planning,Programming,Design,andConstruction.An economicanalysishasbeenpreparedcomparingthe
alternativesof new construction,acquisition,andstatusquo operation.Basedonthe net presentvaluesand
benefitof respectivealternatives,new constructionwasfoundto be the most costeffective overthe life of the
project.Sincethis is replacementhousing,therewill be no increasein the studentspopulationor impacton
the ability of local schooldistrictto supportbasedependents.
The costto improvethesehousingunitsis 77%
of the replacementcost.The constructionagentwill be the Army Corpsof Engineers,SIOH = 6.5%.Base
Civil Engineer:Lt Col Kurt Kaisler,011-49-6565-61-6302.
FOREIGNCURRENCY:FCF BudgetRate
Used:EURO-DOLLAR .8785
..DD
'
}
i
FORM1391C,DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
403
."
I
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION
3. DOD COMPONENT
4. REPORTING
AIR FORCE
1. DATE OF REPORT
INSTALLATION
2. FISCAL YEAR
July-o4
a. NAME
5. DATA AS OF
REPORT CONTROL
2006
SYMBOL
DD-A&L(AR)1716
b. LOCATION
SPANGDAHLEM
AIR BASE
Phase 1
GERMANY
Oct-03
ANALYSIS
OF
REQUIREMENTS AND ASSETS
6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH
7. PERMANENT
CURRENT
OFFICER
E9-E7
(a)
(b)
E6-E1
(c)
TOTAL
(d)
PROJECTED
OFFICER
E9-E7
(e)
(f)
E6-E1
(g)
TOTAL
(h)
328
346
3,528
4,202
328
346
3,528
4,202
328
346
3,528
4,202
328
346
3,528
4,202
227
319
1,755
2,301
227
319
17
24
48
0
0
0
7
24
48
0
0
0
15
25
262
294
2,039
PARTY PERSONNEL
8. GROSS FAMILY HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
9. TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY
HOUSED (a + b + c)
a INVOLUNTARILY
SEPARATED
b. IN MILITARYHOUSINGTO BE
DISPOSED/REPLACED
C UNACCEPTABLYHOUSEDIN COMMUNITY
10. VOLUNTARY
0
SEPARATIONS
11. EFFECTIVE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
12. HOUSING ASSETS
(a + b)
448
1,815
371
1,394
a. UNDER MILITARYCONTROL
(1) HOUSEDIN EXISTINGDOD
OWNED/CONTROLLED
(2) UNDERCONTRACT/APPROVED
604
758
604
758
48
79
(3) VACANT
0
(4) INACTIVE
0
b. PRIVATEHOUSING
120
(1) ACCEPTABLYHOUSED
120
(2) ACCEPTABLEVACANTRENTAL
0
13. EFFECTIVE HOUSING DEFICIT
14. PROPOSED PROJECT
7
24
15. REMARKS
00 FORM 1523, NOV"
404
I
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
COMMAND
INCIRLIK AIR BASE
UNITED STATES AIR
TURKEY
FORCES EUROPE
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
Strength
OFF
ENL
CIV
OFF ENL
CIV
AS OF 30 SEP 04
146
1326 1105
229
0
0
END FY 2009
143
1365 1103
229
0
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
3,328
Inventory Total as of: (30 Sep 03)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2007)
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
2. DATE
5. AREA CONST
COST INDEX
0.9
SUPPORTED
OFF
ENL
CIV
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
2,806
2,840
1,187,992
6,101
22,730
0
0
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
8600
1,225,423
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
(FY 2006)
COST DESIGN
~
PROJECTTITLE
SCOPE
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing
100 UN
$.000
22,730
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
None
(FY 2007)
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
None
(FY08-11)
START
STATUS
CMPL
Aug-04
9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
10. The 39th Wing provides host services to forces deployed in support of Operation Northern Watch.
home to an AMC Air Mobility Squadron.
May-05
750
It is also
DD Form 1390,24 Jul 00
405
1. COMPONENT
AIR
FORCE
I
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
1REPLACEFAMIL Y HOUSING
1
LJYC064002
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
INCIRLIK AIR BASE ADANA, TURKEY
1
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY CODE
88741
17. PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
9. COST ESTIMATE
U/M
QUANTITY
ITEM
Military Family Housing
Dwellings
SupportCosts:
CommunicationsSupport
Site Improvements
Landscaping
Utility Mains
Streets
Recreation
Demolition
Environmental
UN
100
l
J 2. DATE
.
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
UNIT COST
$22,730
COSTJ.$OOO)
13,893
( 13,893)
6 434
,
( 850 )
(364)
(617)
( 1,133 )
( 1,500 )
( 1,153 )
(322)
(495)
138,930
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
Subtotal
20
Contingency (5%)
Total ContractCost
SIOH (6.5%)
1,016
21,343
1,387
327
,
ProjectCost
22,730
Area CostFactor LO.~
10. Descriptionof ProposedConstruction:Demolish150and construct100family housingunits. Includes
demolition,site clearing,replacement/upgrade
of utility systemsandroads,and constructionof new multiplex
units. Providesnormalamenitiesto includevehicle parking,air conditioning,exteriorpatios, privacy fencing,
playgrounds,and landscaping.Includesdemolition,asbestosandleadbasedpaint removal.
Paygrades
E4-E6
01-03
04-05
06
06 Installation COR
Bedrooms
4
4
4
4
4
Programmed
N.s.E
.G.SE
1,570
1,950
1,730
2,150
1,860
2,310
2,030
2,520
2,230
2,770
.G.s.M
181
200
215
234
257
Project
~
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
Cost Per
.G.s.M
784
784
784
784
784
Totals:
Maximum size: E4-E6
Maximum size: 01-03
Maximum size: 04-05
4 Bedroom
4 Bedroom
4 Bedroom
($000)
IQ!2!
6,386
1,976
4,855
495
181
100
13,893
1790 NSF /2220 GSF /206 GSM
2020 NSF /2500 GSF /232 GSM
2180 NSF /2700 GSF /251 GSM
Maximum size: 06 4 Bedroom
Maximum size: 06 Installation COR 4 Bedroom
11. REQUIREMENT: 850 UN
No
Un@
50
14
32
3
1
2350 NSF /2920
2350 NSF /2920
ADEQUATE: 0 UN
GSF /271 GSM
GSF /271 GSM
SUBSTANDARD: 850 UN
PROJECT:ReplaceMilitary Family Housing (CurrentMission).
REQUIREMENT: This project is requiredto provide modemand efficient housingfor the airmanandU.S.
Governmentcivilian ~l~es
and their dependents
stationedat Incirlik Air Base.All units will meet
DOFORM1391,DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
406
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA.
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
INCIRLIK AIR BASE ADANA, ruRKEY
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
2 DATE
6. CATEGORY CODE
REPLACE FAMIL Y HOUSING
7. PROJECT NUMBER
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
88741
711-142
LJYC064002
$22,730
Governmentcivilian employeesand their dependents
stationedat Incirlik Air Base.All units will meet
modemhousingstandardsandareprogrammedin accordancewith the HousingCommunityProfile. The
designwill provide a modemkitchen,living room, family room, bedroomsand bathconfiguration, with ample
interior and exteriorstorage.Units will be providedwith a single-cargarageand exteriorparking for a second
vehicle.Adequateinfrastructuresupportfor roadsandutilities shallalsobe provided.The project is
programmedin accordancewith the FY2004Family Housing MasterPlan.
CURRENTSI11JAllON: The currentMFH at Incirlik consistsof 900units; 750 unitswere constructedin
1983thru 1985andneedimprovementsto meetacceptableliving standards.The remaining150units
identified for this projectwereconstructedin 1961andarein inadequateconditionandbeyond economical
upgrade/improvement.
Theseunits weresurplusandprefabricatedbuildings,which wereconvertedinto
housing.Despiteextensivemaintenanceandrepair effortsandexpenses,settlementand shifting of foundations
continueto causestructuraldamage.Electrical,mechanical,and otherutility systemsareoutdatedand do not
meetcodesand regulations,energycapacityand efficiencyrequirements.
IMP ACT IF NOT PROVIDED: The assignedpersonneland their families will continueto be housedin
inadequatehousingunits, resultingin poorerquality of life. Theseunsatisfactoryconditionswill affectthe
moraleandwelfare of our military personneland their families.Also, the U.S. Governmentwill continueto
spendMFH fundsperformingpiecemealmaintenanceand repairon outdatedfacilities.
ADDinONAL: This projectis not eligible for NATO funding.This projectmeetsthe criteria specified in the
Air ForceFamily HousingGuide for Planning,Programming,Design,andConstruction.There will be no
increasein the studentpopulationgeneratedwith this project. An economicanalysishasbeenprepared
comparingthe alternativesof new constructionandstatusquo operation.Basedon the netpresentvaluesand
benefitof this respectivealternative,new constructionwasfoundto be most costeffective overthe life of the
project. Improvementis not consideredasa viable alternativebecauseof theunrecoverablefoundation
problems.The costto improvethis housingis 100+%of the replacementcost. SIOHis 6.5%to fund U.S.
Army Corps of EngineersexecutionagentandAir Forceoversight.Director of Civil Engineering:RobertE.
Lally, Civ., DSN 676-6898.
DDFORM1391C,DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDmDNSMAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
407
~
MILITARY
FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION
1. DATE OF REPORT
2. FISCAL YEAR
July-o4
3. DOD COMPONENT
REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL
DD-A&L(AR)1716
4. REPORTING INSTALLATION
AIR FORCE
5.
2006
a. NAME
DATA AS OF
b. LOCATION
INCIRLIK AIR BASE
TURKEY
Jan-O1
ANALYSIS
OF
REQUIREMENTS AND ASSETS
CURRENT
OFFICER
E9-E7
(a)
(b)
E6-E1
(c)
TOTAL
(d)
PROJECTED
OFFICER
E9-E7
(e)
(f)
E6-E1
(g)
TOTAL
6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH
7.
PERMANENT
315
146
1,149
308
144
1,087
315
146
1,149
308
144
1,087
0
0
0
50
0
50
16
0
0
PARTY PERSONNEL
8. GROSS FAMilY
HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
9. TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY
a. INVOlUt-rfARll
HOUSED (a + b + c)
Y SEPARATED
b. IN MILITARY HOUSING TO BE
DISPOSEO/REPLACED
C
UNACCEPTABLY
10. VOLUNTARY
HOUSED IN COMMUNITY
SEPARATIONS
0
11. EFFECTIVE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
12. HOUSING ASSETS
(8 + b)
a UNDER MILITARY COt-rfRDL
(1) HOUSED IN EXISTING DOD
OWNED/CONTROLLED
(2) UNDER CONTRACT/APPROVED
(3) VACAt-rf
(4) INACTIVE
b. PRIVATE HOUSING
(1) ACCEPTABLYHDUSED
(2) ACCEPTABLE
VACANT REt-rfAL
13. EFFECTIVE HOUSING DEFICIT
14. PROPOSED
PROJECT
15. REMARKS
DD FORM 1523,NOY"
4'08
1. COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
COMMAND
5. AREA CONST
RAF LAKENHEATH
UNITED STATES AIR
COST INDEX
UNITED KINGDOM
FORCES EUROPE
1.2
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
Strength
OFF
ENL
CIV
OFF ENL
CIV
OFF
ENL
CIV
AS OF 30 SEP 04
554
4398 1002
0
0
0
2
5
344
END FY 2009
555
4470
937
0
0
0
2
5
344
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
2,004
Inventory Total as of: (30 Sep 03)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2007)
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
.Q.QQ£
PROJECT TITLE
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph 3
SCOPE
107 UN
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing, Ph 4
74 UN
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
711-142
Replace Military Family Housing
185 UN
TOTAL
6,305
6,313
1,923,593
54,391
48,437
30,883
63,403
73825
2,194,532
(FY 2006)
COST DESIGN
$.000
START
48,437 Sep-04
STATUS
CMPL
Jun-05
(FY 2007)
30,883
(FY08-11)
63,403
9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
10. A fighter wing equipped with two squadrons of F-15Es and one squadron of F-15C/Ds.
2,727
..
DO Form 1390, 24 Jul 00
;;0
.,,-
409
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
I
1 2 DATE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA.
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
RAF LAKENHEA TH, UNITED KINGDOM
REPLACEMILITARY FAMIL Y HOUSING (pHASE
1
3J
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
16. CATEGORY
88741
CODE
1 7.
PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
8. PROJECT
MSET064026
COST ($000)
$48,437
9. COST ESTIMATE
ITEM
U/M
Military Family Housing
Dwellings
OtherSpecialConstruction
SupportCosts:
Lot Costs
SiteImprovements
Landscaping
Utility Mains
Streets
Recreation
Demolition
Environmental
OtherSite Work
QUANTITY
UN
UN
UNIT COST
107
107
COST-L$OOO)
22,639
( 17,030)
(5,609)
21,717
( 1,789 )
(2,713 )
(1,179)
( 5,296 )
( 1,581 )
( 964 )
( 1,936 )
( 2,222 )
(4,037)
159,159
52,421
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
Subtotal
Contingency (5%)
Total ContractCost
SIOH (4.0%)
44,356
2,217
46,573
1,862
ProjectCost
48,437
Area CostFactor (1.2)
10. Descriptionof ProposedConstruction:Demolish27 four-plexunits (108 units total) and construct107
singleand multiplex family housingunits with all necessaryamenitiesandsupportingfacilities. Project
includessite preparation,singlecar garages,
parking,exteriorpatiosand privacy fencing,soundattenuation,
recreationalareas,utilities, supportinfrastructureof roads,landscaping,demolition,andasbestosremoval.
Specialconstructionincludesmasonryconstruction,concretetile roofs,anddual 11OVand 220V electrical
systems,etc.
Programmed
Payarades
E4-E6
E7-E8
01-03
06
07+ Special Command
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
size:
size:
size:
size:
size:
Bedrooms ~
3
3
3
4
4
E4-E6 3 Bedroom
E7-E8 3 Bedroom
01-03
3 Bedroom
06 4 Bedroom
07+ Special Command
DD FORM 1391, DEC 99
1,310
1,500
1,500
2,030
2,960
4 Bedroom
Project
~
~
1,630
1,860
1,860
2,520
3,660
1420
1650
1650
2350
3270
NSF
NSF
NSF
NSF
NSF
~
151
173
173
234
340
/1760
/2050
/2050
/2920
/4060
Cost Per
~
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
GSF
GSF
GSF
GSF
GSF
/164
/190
/190
/271
/377
No
J.!Dlt§.
($000)
IQ.tgl
784
784
784
784
784
40
37
24
5
1
5,682
6,022
3,906
1,100
320
Totals:
107
17,030
GSM
GSM
GSM
GSM
GSM
PREVIOUSEDITIONSMAY BE USED INTERNAllY UNTil EXHAUSTED
410
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
I
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA.
1
2 DATE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
RAP LAKENHEATH, UNITED KINGDOM
REPLACEMILITARY FAMILY HOUSING (pHASE
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
88741
11. REQUIREMENT: 4748 UN
1
3)
6. CATEGORY CODE
711-142
ADEQUATE: 4369 UN
17. PROJECT NUMBER
MSET064026
1
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
$48,437
SUBSTANDARD: 379 UN
PROJECT:ReplaceMilitary Family Housing (CurrentMission).
REOUIREMENT:This projectis requiredto provide modemand efficienthousingfor mili~ membersand
their dependents
stationedatRAP Lakenheath.All units will meetmodemstandardsandareprogrammedin
accordancewith the HousingCommunityProfile. This projectis phasethree (3) of a five (5) phasehousing
projectto replace606housingunits. The replacementhousingwill providea modemkitchen,laundry room,
openplan family andliving rooms,bedrooms,and bath configurations,with ampleinterior and exteriorstorage
and a garage.Exteriorparking will be provided for a secondoccupantvehicle andguests.Supportcostsare
higherthan normalasthe whole PhaseIII neighborhoodof 408 unitsis replacedandreconfiguredinto Liberty
Village, a denserneighborhoodof 606 units to meetcurrentUK communitydesignguidance.Replacement
constructionincludesreconfiguringthe neighborhoodto createa senseof communityandincreasedefficiency
anddensity.Neighborhoodsupportinfrastructurewill be replacedandupgradedto meetcurrentand future
housingrequirements.Pressureratedwaterlines will be installedandattachedto the newbasepressurized
system.New sewermainsand pump stationswill be installedto supportthe newhousinglayout plan and
connectionsto the basesewermainsand treatmentcenter.Brick pavedroadsanddrivewaysin neighborhood
blocks will be substitutedfor stormdrainageto allow stormwaterto soakinto the groundto rechargethe base
aquifer,reducingthe needto import waterfrom the localutility.
CURRENTSITUATION: This projectreplaces107housingunitsconstructedin the 1950's.These50 plus
yearold housesareshowingthe effectsof ageandcontinuousheavyuse.Theyhavehadno majorupgrades
since constructionanddo no meetthe needsof today'sfamilies,nor do theyprovide a modemhome
environment.Plumbingand electricalsystemsareantiquatedanddo not meetmodembuilding codes.
Additionally, the electricalsystemsareundersizedandthe quantityof receptaclesis inadequate.Lighting
systemsthroughoutthehousesare inefficient andrequirereplacement.
Existinghouseplansdo not meet
suitability standards.Threebed unitshave only oneundersizedbathroomper unit anddo not have family
rooms.Units haveno coveredentry,inadequatestorage,andno separatelaundryrooms.Kitchensare
undersizedand galleyshapedwith old cabinetsand badly worn countertopsandsinks.Flooring throughoutthe
houseis outdated.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Major moraleproblemswill resultif this replacementinitiative is not
supported.The housingwill continueto be occupieduntil it becomestotally uninhabitablebecauseadequate
andaffordableoff-basehousingis not available.Ifunits arenot replacedthencostlypiecemealrepairswill
continuewith no improvementin the living quality.
ADDITIONAL: This projectmeetsthecriteria/scopespecifiedin the Air ForceFamily HousingGuide for
Planning,Programming,Design,andConstruction.An economicanalysishasbeenpreparedcomparingthe
alternativesof new construction,improvement,andstatusquo operation.Basedonthe net presentvaluesand
benefit of this respectivealternative,the costto improvethis housingis approximately88%of the replacement
cost.Sincethis is replacement
housing,therewill be no increasein the studentpopulationor impact on the
ability of the local schooldistrictto supportbasedependents.
This projectis not eligible for NATO funding.
SIOH is 4.0% to fund United Kingdom executionagentsandAir Forceprojectoversight.BaseCivil Engineer:
Lt Col DimasalangJunio,(44) 1638-52-2100.FOREIGNCURRENCY:FCF BugetRateUsed:
EURO-DOLLAR .8785.
DDFORM1391C,DEC99
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
.411
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION
1. DATE OF REPORT
2. FISCAL YEAR
July-04
3. DOD COMPONENT
REPORT CONTROL
2006
SYMBOL
DD-A&L(AR)1116
4. REPORTING INSTALLATION
AIR FORCE
a. NAME
5. DATA AS OF
b. LOCATION
LAKENHEATH
RAF
Phase 3
UNITED KINGDOM
Oct-03
ANALYSIS
OF
REQUIREMENTS
6. TOTAL PERSONNEL
1. PERMANENT
CURRENT
AND ASSETS
PROJECTED
OFFICER
(a)
E9-E1
(b)
E6-E1
(c)
TOTAL
(d)
OFFICER
(e)
E9-E1
(f)
E6-E1
(9)
TOTAL
(h)
921
823
6,858
8,602
921
823
6,858
8,602
921
823
6,858
8,602
921
823
6,858
8,602
645
692
3,613
4,950
30
31
0
0
30
31
40
0
0
0
24
30
148
202
30
148
621
662
3,465
4,148
662
3,465
4,148
108
681
3,109
5,104
547
546
2,644
3,131
325
267
1,552
2,144
112
267
1,552
1,931
112
267
1,552
1,931
116
821
31
40
STRENGTH
PARTY PERSONNEL
8. GROSS FAMILY HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
9. TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY
HOUSED
(a+b+c)
a INVOLUNTARILYSEPARATED
b. IN MILITARYHOUSINGTO BE
DISPOSED/REPLACED
C. UNACCEPTABLYHOUSEDIN COMMUNITY
10. VOLUNTARY
SEPARATIONS
11. EFFECTIVE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
12. HOUSING ASSETS
(a + b)
a UNDERMILITARYCONTROL
(1) HOUSEDIN EXISTINGDOD
OWNED/CONTROLLED
(2) UNDERCONTRACT/APPROVED
I
(3)
(4)
VACANT
0
0
0
INACTIVE
0
0
0
0
383
2,157
2,960
383
2,157
2,960
0
0
0
b. PRIVATEHOUSING
(1) ACCEPTABLYHOUSED
(2) ACCEPTABLEVACANT RENTAL
13. EFFECTIVE HOUSING DEFICIT
14. PROPOSED
PROJECT
30
15. REMARKS
DO FORM 15%3,
NOV"
412
," ,
POST ACQUISITION
CONSTRUCTION
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
FY 2006 POSTACOmSITION CONSTRUCTION
Program(In Thousands)
FY 2006 Program $ 420,203
FY 2005 Program $ 238,353
PYrP:Qse
and Scone
The Air Force has approximately 90,000 family housing units (includes 42,000 privatized
units) for FY 2006. The average age of housing units in the Air Force inventory is over 33
years. Based on recent analysis incorporated into the Air Force Family Housing Master Plan
(AF FHMP), in the beginning ofFY 2006 approximately 23,000 of these units now require
improvement or renovation to meet contemporary living standardsduring the next decade.
Under existing agreements,it is expected the host nations will revitalize 3,000 units leaving
20,000 units for the Air Force to revitalize. Many of these units require major expenditures
to repair or replace deteriorated mechanical, electrical, or structural components, and to
provide some of the basic modem amenities found in comparable community housing. The
Post Acquisition Construction Program provides this neededrevitalization. Each project also
includes a significant amount of concurrent maintenance and repair to maximize the project
cost effectiveness.
The Air Force is the acknowledged DoD leader in developing the "whole house"
revitalization concept. Whole house is the combination of neededmaintenance and repair
together with improvements to bring the unit to contemporary standards. In addition, we are
looking beyond the house to the entire housing area in our requirements plan. Our "whole
neighborhood" concept is being refined and includes the development of supporting housing
infrastructure requirements, neighborhood vehicular and pedestrian circulation concepts to
consider siting, density, landscaping, parking, playgrounds, recreation areasand utilities, in
addition to the housing unit itself.
A total of three projects are identified as privatization candidates in this submission (Peterson
AFB and Air Force Academy, CO, and F.E. Warren AFB, WY). If privatization proves not to
be financially feasible or not in the best interest of the Air Force, the Air Force will instead
execute an improvement project at such an installation as follows:
PetersonAFB, CO
Air Force Academy, CO
F.E. Warren AFB, WY
February 2005
($15.124M/70 units)
($10.082M/44 units)
($39.936M/103 units)
PageNo .413~
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
r
MILITARY FAMll..Y HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
Consistentwith Authorizationand AppropriationCommittees'languagein FY 1990,the Air
Forceis seekingto maintainfunding in this accountto continuerevitalizing our aginghomes.
Consistentwith AppropriationCommittees'languagein FY 1985,the Air Forcehasgathered
dataon the postacquisitionconstructionprojectsto detail pastprojectson theseunits and any
future work beingprogrammedwithin a threeyearperiod. This information is providedas a
part of this submittal.
ProgramSummary
Authorizationis requestedfor:
(1) Variousimprovementsto existingpublic quarters,asdescribedon DD Form 1391.
(2) Appropriationof $420,203,000to fund projectsin FY 2006.
NOTE: Projectswithin the programare within the statutorylimitation of $50,000per unit
adjustedby areacostfactor, exceptasidentified by separateDD Form 1391.
February2005
PageNo.
414
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALlATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
VARIOUS AIR FORCEBASES
FAMILY HOUSING POSTACQUISITION
CONSTRUCTION
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY CODE
88742/31196
7. PROJECT NUMBER
711-000
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
420,203
9. COST ESTIMATE
ITEM
POST ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTSTO IMPROVE HOUSING UNITS
PROJECTSTO PRIVATIZE HOUSING UNITS
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
TOTAL REQUEST
U/M
QUANTITY
UN
UN
2,076
2,253
COST
($000)
UNIT COST
(355,061)
(65,142)
420 203
420'203
,
10. DESCRIPTIONOF PROPOSEDCONSTRUCTION:Includesall work necessaryto revitalize military family
housingby providing: air-conditioning,whereauthorized;modemfunctionallayouts;soundproofmg;and utility and
site improvements.Energyconservationactionsinclude newand additionalinsulation,stormwindows,solarscreens,
and efficient heatingand cooling systems.
11. PROJECT: This requestis for an authorizationand appropriationof $420.203million to accomplishimprovement
and privatization in family housing.
REQUIREMENT: To revitalize and improvethe livability of older, obsoletefamily housingunits,to conserveenergy
in theseolder housingunits, andto bring utility systemsup to currentsafetystandards.Whole-houseimprovements
include but are not limited to: kitchenupgrades,bathroomadditions/upgrades,
repair/replacement
of roofs, upgradeof
mechanicaland electricalsystems,replacementof windows,doors,floors, and exterior improvements(patios,fences,
storages,etc.)
CURRENT SITUATION: The majority of thesefamily housingunits were constructedduring the late 1940's and
1950'susing various designand constructioncriteria, with different typesof material,equipment,and appliances.
Many utility and structuralsystemswere constructedduring yearsof plentiful, inexpensiveenergyresources.Insulation,
stormwindows and doors,etc., not previouslycosteffective,are now soundinvestment.This programwill extendthe
usefullife of many of our older, lessmodemunits by enhancinglivability, functionality,reducingoperationcostsand
improving safetystandards.
ADDITIONAL: Theseprojectsmeetthe criteria/scopespecifiedin Part II of Military Handbook1190,"Facility
Planningand DesignGuide." Energyevaluation/life-cyclecostanalysiswasperformedin supportof theseprojects.
The Air Force will improve existing family housing units to the size and floor pattern similar to the local
standards and up to the following size: E1-E6: 2 BR (1080 NSF/1340 GSF), 2 BR Modified (1180
NSF/1480 GSF), 3 BR (1310 NSF/1630 GSF), 4 BR (1570 NSF/1950 GSF), 5 BR (1850 NSF/23 00 GSF);
E7-E9/01-03: 2 BR (1200 NSF/1490 GSF), 2 BR Modified (1350 NSF/1670 GSF), 3 BR (1500 NSF/1860
GSF),4 BR (1730 NSF/2150 GSF), 5 BR (2020 NSF/2510 GSF); 04-05: 3 BR (1630 NSF/2020 GSF), 4
BR (1860 NSF/2310 GSF); 0-6: 4 BR (2030 NSF/2520 GSF); 0-7: 4 BR (2690 NSF/3330 GSF).
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
~
r.
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO
415
I
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION
ANDLOCATION
VARIOUS AIR FORCEBASES
4. PROJECT
TITLE
POST ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT DATA
1
5. PROJECT
NUMBER
10. Descriptionof work to be accomplished
CurrentWorking
Estimate ($000)
Locationand Project
UNITED STATES
CALIFORNIA
FORT MACARTHUR HOUSING ANNEX
WHOLE HOUSE UPGRADE
HHEK034017
-Provides "Whole House" renovationof 188housingunits, including six (6)
nationalregisteredhistoric units. Includesupgradesto kitchens,bathrooms,
mechanicaland electricalsystems.Project includesinfrastructureimprovement
work to existing utilities, site work, asphaltshingleroof replacement,stucco
crackingrepair, newgaragedoors, waterline replacementdueto foundation
settlement,fencing,roadsand sidewalkrepair, utility lighting, and playgrounds.
Projectincludesdemolitionof(41) surplushousingunits at Fort MacArthur.
(SeparateDD Form1391 attached)
-WORK ACCOMPLISHED
IN PREVIOUSTHREEYEARS:None
-WORK PROGRAMMED
FORNEXTTHREEYEARS:None
COLORADO
AF ACADEMY
PRIVATIZE FAMILY HOUSING
19,803
10,082
XQPZ067270
-Convey 1211existingunits and ultimately demolish766units for a privatization
end stateatthe USAFA of 445 units with about310 acresof land lease.Without
privatization, MILCON cost for this work is $54M for an anticipatedleverageof
12:1 (combinedwith PetersonAFB). Privatizedunits will provide modem
interior and exteriorconveniencesand meetcurrentspaceand floor plan requirements.
(SeparateDD Form 1391attached)
-WORK ACCOMPLISHED
IN PREVIOUSTHREEYEARS: MILCON replacement!
renovationof92 housingunits in FY 2003.
-WORK PROGRAMMED
FORNEXTTHREEYEARS: None
PETERSONAFB
PRIVATIZE FAMIL Y HOUSING
TDKA064006
-Convey 493 and construct639 newunits for a privatizationend stateof 1132units
supportingPetersonAFB, CheyenneMountain AFS, and SchrieverAFB. Without
privatization,MILCON costto improve,replace,and construct1132units is $249M.
Combinedwith AF Academy,estimatedleverageis 12:1. The land, approximately
200 acres,supportingthe privatizationproject will be leasedto the developer. The
developerwill provide an additional50 plus acresfor someof the new deficit units.
(SeparateDD Form 1391attached)
-WORK ACCOMPLISHED
IN PREVIOUSTHREEYEARS: MILCON whole house
renovationof87 units in FY 2003. MILCON constructionof two GOQ'sin
FY 2003. Repairhousingelectricaldistribution in FY03-FY04.
Repairandreconfigureparking in FY03-FY05.
-WORK PROGRAMMED
FORNEXTTHREEYEARS: None
DDFORM1391c,DEC76
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
15,124
PAGENO
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
,416
1. COMPONENT
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
FY 2006
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
VARIOUS AIR FORCE BASES
4. PROJECT TITLE
POST ACQUISITION
CONSTRUCTION
10. Description
DATA
1
S. PROJECT NUMBER
of work to be accomplished
CUlTent Working
Estimate ($000)
Location and Project
DISTRI~T OF COLUMBIA
BOLLING
AFB
IMPROVE F AMIL Y HOUSING
BXUR299 I 18
-Improve
24 GOQs housing units with all necessary amenities and supporting
facilities. Project includes interior and exterior modernization, utility upgrade,
additions to meet cUlTent standards. Renovates kitchens, bathrooms, and floor
11,090
coverings. Upgrade electrical, plumbing and lighting systems to increase
efficiency and improve safety. Includes asbestos & lead-based paint removal.
(Separate DD Form 1391 attached)
-WORK ACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS: None
-WORK PROGRAMMED FOR NEXT THREE YEARS: None
FLORIDA
MACDILL
AFB
IMPROVE FAMILY
HOUSING
NVZR043712RI
-Improve
General Officer Quarter (GOQ) units 401, 402, 403, 404 and 405
through whole house (interior and exterior) renovations to bring the units to
contemporary standards. Work includes upgrading bathroom and laundry room
fixtures and fmishes; repairing or replacing exterior stucco wall finish;
2 246
,
replacing windows and frames; replacing exterior door hardware; replacing
water heater and HV AC system and its controls; installing electrical service
disconnects and smoke detectors; replacing closet shelving; reconfiguring
the kitchen eating area and laundry room; upgrading 3 bathrooms; repairing
water infiltration problems at chimney and repairing or replacing wood soffit;
constructing 2-car garages with bulk storage; and replacing the patio and privacy fences.
(Separate DD Form 1391 attached)
-WORK ACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS: None
-WORK PROGRAMMED FOR NEXT THREE YEARS: None
IDAHO
MT HOME AFB
IMPROVE FAMILY
4,026
HOUSING
QYZH681083
-Upgrade
12 existing two story units through Whole House Renovation. The HCP
House Suitability Plan proposes to add a bathroom to the 2nd floor master bedroom,
install a larger closet to bedroom #3, enclose the existing laundry room, eliminate
the 4th bedroom on the lower floor for the inclusion of a Family Room and relocate
the kitchen, living room and dining room arrangement on the lower floor for better
efficiency.
A new porch with overhang will be added that replicates those on the other
renovated units in the subdivision.
The existing carport is to be replaced with a
combination unit consisting of a single car garage, storage area and trash enclosure at
each unit. These 12 units are being downsized from a 4 bedroom unit to a 3 bedroom unit
because of their size. Each unit cUlTently contains 1408 NSF and 1769 GSF which is between
DO FORM 1391c, DEC 76
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL
EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO
417
1. COMPONENT
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALlATION AND LOCATION
VARIOUS AIR FORCE BASES
4. PROJECT TITLE
POST ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION
1
5. PROJECT NUMBER
10. Descriptionof work to be accomplished
CurrentWorking
Estimate ($000)
Location and Project
IDAHO (Cont.)
MT HOME AFB
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING
QYZH681083
the benchmark(1350NSF and 1670GSF)andthe maximumsize(1500 NSF
and 1860 GSF) for an improved 3 bedroomSeniorNon-CommissionedOfficer
(SNCO)housingunit.
(SeparateDD Form 1391 attached)
-WORK ACCOMPLISHED
IN PREVIOUSlliREE YEARS:None
-WORK PROGRAMMED
FORNEXTlliREE YEARS: None
KANSAS
MCCONNELL AFB
IMPROVE FAMIL Y HOUSING
4 026
,
699
PRQE069001
-Improves 3 housingunits. Includespavementfor streetsnear westgateand
off-streetparking areain this area,electricalservice,communications,mechanical
and structuralupgradesto meetcurrentlocal building codecriteria and
Stateof Kansasminimumhousingenergycriteria; upgradeskitchens,
bathrooms,living areas,providesgarageadditions,additionalclosetstorage
capacity,replacementdoorsand molding,replacementof datedlighting fIXtures;
constructsfIre protectionenclosuresaroundgasfIred furnacesand hot water
heaters;includesasbestos/lead
basedpaint abatement,radongas ventilation,
providesimproveddriveways;constructsa neighborhoodaccessroad; provides
trees for landscapescreening,providesreplacementundergroundelectrical
feedSfrom transformersto housingunits,constructsneighborhoodsidewalks,
road crossings,and streetlighting.
(SeparateDD Form 1391 attached)
-WORK ACCOMPLISHED
IN PREVIOUSlliREE YEARS:None
-WORK PROGRAMMED
FORNEXTlliREE YEARS: None
MARYLAND
ANDREWS AFB
IMPROVE FAMIL Y HOUSING
28,216
AJXF064006
-Improve 152 INCO and 26 CGO quarters,with all necessaryamenities
and supportingfacilities. Projectincludesinterior and exterior modernization,
and utility upgrade.Renovateroof, structural/foundation/exterior
walls,
structural/otherbuilding elements,mechanical,electrical,general,all kitchen,
baths,laundry,housesitework, landscapingand signage.Includesdemolition
of 30 surplusunits.
(SeparateDD Form 1391attached)
-WORK ACCOMPLISHED
IN PREVIOUS
lliREE YEARS:None
-WORK PROGRAMMED
FORNEXTlliREE YEARS: None
DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO
418
1. COMPONENT
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
VARIOUS AIR FORCEBASES
4. PROJECT TITLE
/
POSTACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION
5. PROJECT NUMBER
10. Descriptionof work to be accomplished
CurrentWorking
Estimate ($000)
Locationand Project
NORTH CAROLINA
POPE AFB
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING
TMKH064002
-Provides generalinterior and exterior modernizationand renovationof
138housingunits. Includesutility upgradesand additionsto meetcurrent
standards.Upgradekitchens,bathrooms,and floor coverings,improves
floor plans,providesincreasedenergyefficiency, privacy fencing,patios,
playgroundsand recreationareas. Replacesexisting overheadelectrical
distribution with an undergroundsystemandreplacessewersystem.
Constructsan additionalhousingaccessroad and demolishesfour units
in way of the road. Includesdemolitionand asbestos/lead-based
paint
removal.
(SeparateDD Form1391 attached)
-WORK ACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS: None
-WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT THREE YEARS: None
TENNESSEE
ARNOLD AFB
IMPROVE FAMIL Y HOUSING
ANZY06400 1
-Provide housingandneighborhoodimprovementfor 40 housingunits.
Replaceroofs, repairdamageto exterior, convert/constructgarages,
add trashenclosures,increaseunit size,upgrademechanicalsystems,
and upgradechain-linkto privacy fencing. There are 24 units that
requiremaintenanceandrepair only, while 16 unitsrequire maintenance,
repair and construction.
(SeparateDD Form 1391 attached)
-WORK ACCOMPLISHED
IN PREVIOUSTHREEYEARS:Mold Remediation
40 units;Guttercaps40units;Maintenance
painting7 units;Upgrade
playground
equipment;Screened-in
porches
40 units;PestControl40 units.
-WORK PROGRAMMED
FORNEXTTHREEYEARS:None
WYOMING
F E WARREN AFB
PRIVATIZE FAMIL Y HOUSING
GHLN064000
-Convey 676 existingsingleand multiplex units and construct110 deficit units.
Combinedwith prior approved265-unit privatizationproject,this will produce
a privatizationendstateof941 units (including 1 GOQ) on approximately400
acresof leasedlands. Without privatization,MILCON cost for this work is $99.5M
for an anticipatedleverageof 2.5:1 (by groupingwith otherbasesthe combined
leveragewill be greaterthan 3.0:1). Privatizedunits will provide moderninterior
and exteriorconveniences
and meetcurrentspaceand floor plan requirements.
(SeparateDD Form1391 attached)
-WORK ACCOMPLISHED
IN PREVIOUSTHREEYEARS:None
-WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT THREE YEARS: None
DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
--
16,625
1,930
39,936
PAGE NO
419
~
1. COMPONENT
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND lOCATION
VARIOUS AIR FORCEBASES
1
4. PROJECT TITLE
5. PROJECT NUMBER
POSTACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION
10. Descriptionof work to be accomplished
CurrentWorking
Estimate ($000)
Locationand Project
OVERSEAS
GERMANY
RAMSTEIN AB
IMPROVE FAMIL Y HOUSING
TYFR064009
-Provides generalinterior modernizationand renovationof 16housingunits.
Includesutility upgradesand additionsto meetcurrentstandards.Upgrades
kitchens,bathrooms,and floor coverings,improvesfloor plans,provides
increasedenergyefficiency, privacy fencing,patios,playgroundsand
recreationareas. Includesdemolitionand asbestos/lead-based
paint removal.
(SeparateDD Form 1391 attached)
4519
,
-WORK ACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS nIREE YEARS: None
-WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT nIREE YEARS: None
JAPAN
KADENA AB
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING
LXEZ064152
-Provides generalinterior and exterior modernizationand renovationof
570housingunits. Includesutility upgradesand additionsto meetcurrent
standards.Upgradekitchens,bedrooms,bathroomsandfmishes;improves
floor plans,provides energyefficiency, fencing,patios,playgroundsand
recreationareas.Includesdemolitionand all environmentalremoval/disposal
work. Providecoveredgarage(GOQ). Provide handicapimprovementsin the
towerincluding emergencypower backup. Convert52 INCO three-bedroom
units into two-bedroomunits. Converttwo GOQ 3 BR unitsto 4 BR units.
(SeparateDD Form 1391 attached)
107,469
-WORK ACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS nIREE YEARS: None
-WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT nIREE YEARS: None
MISA WA AB
IMPROVE FAMIL Y HOUSING
QKKAO64025
-Provides generalinterior and exterior modernizationand renovationof
281 housingunits. Includesutility upgrades,additionsto meetcurrent
standards,force protectionmeasures,site improvement,coveredparking
for H-Style units,storagesheds,parking for residents/guests,
playground
and landscaping.Providespitchedroof, coveredcourtandmud rooms.
Replacesfloor heaterswith forced air ceilingmountedheatersto include
fan andtemperaturecontroller. Upgradeskitchens,bathrooms,and floor
coverings,improvesfloor plans,and install soundinsulationfor Tower (1937)
to includereplacingwindowrails and handicapaccessibilityfor 1stand2nd floor.
Providesincreasedenergyefficiency, privacyfencing,patiosand recreationareas.
Removesasbestosand lead-basedpaint.
(SeparateDD Form 1391 attached)
58,046
-WORK ACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREEYEARS: None
-WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT THREEYEARS: None
DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNAllY
UNTIL
EXHAUSTED
.--
PAGE NO
420
1. COMPONENT
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
FY 2006
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND lOCATION
VARIOUS AIR FORCE BASES
4. PROJECT TITLE
POSTACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION
1
5. PROJECT NUMBER
10. Descriptionof work to be accomplished
CUlTentWorking
Estimate ($000)
Locationand Project
!
OVERSEAS
JAPAN
YOKOTA AB
IMPROVE FAMIL Y HOUSING
ZNRE064301
-Provides generalinterior and exterior modernizationand renovationof
192housingunits including one generalofficer's quarters(GOQ). Includes
utility upgradesand additionsto meetcUlTentstandards.Upgradeskitchens,
bathrooms,reconfiguresfloor layout, and increasesenergyefficiency. Provides
patios,playgrounds,recreationareasandutilities replacement.Includes
demolitionand asbestos/lead-based
paintremoval.
(SeparateDD Form 1391 attached)
54,913
-WORK ACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS: None
-WORK PROGRAMMED FOR NEXT THREEYEARS: None
PORTUGAL
LAJES FIELD
16,183
IMPROVE FAMIL Y HOUSING
MQNA023006
-Provides generalinteriorand exteriorrenovationof 150 housingunits.
Includesutility upgradeandadditionsto meetcUlTenthousingstandards.
Upgradekitchens,bathrooms,bedroomsand floor coverings,improves
floor plans,and providesincreasedenergyefficiency, privacy fencing,
patios,playgrounds,and recreationareas.
(SeparateDD Form 1391 attached)
-WORK ACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS: Replacedwater distribution,
FY03 and FY04. ConstructedBiera Mar InterconnectingRoad,FY03. ReplacedFenceand
Gates,FY03 and FY04. Installed Mylar, 300 units,FY03. RenovatedKitchensand Bathrooms
(64 units, not included in this scope),FY03. Installed AFN Distribution and TelephoneUpgrade,
FY03. Entry Waysand Patios,170units FY03. Landscaping,FY03. ReplacedHeat Pumps,
FY02, 300 units.
-WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT THREE YEARS: None
SPAIN
MORON AB
IMPROVE FAMIL Y HOUSING
QUUG033002
-Provides generalinterior and exterior modernizationand renovationof
34 housingunits. Includesutility upgradesand additionsto meetcUlTentstandards.
Upgradekitchens,bathrooms,floor coverings,improvesfloor plans, family rooms,
providesincreasedenergyefficiency, privacy fencing,patios,parking andpavements.
Includes demolitionandasbestos/lead-based
paintremoval.
(SeparateDD Form 1391 attached)
7,128
-WORK ACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS: None
-WORK PROGRAMMED FOR NEXT THREE YEARS: None
DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNAllY
UNTil EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO
421
1. COMPONENT
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALlATION AND LOCATION
VARIOUS AIR FORCEBASES
4. PROJECT TITLE
15. PROJECT NUMBER
POST ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION
1
10. Descriptionof work to be accomplished
CurrentWorking
Estimate ($000)
Locationand Project
OVERSEAS
TURKEY
INCIRLIK AB ADANA
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING
LJYC064003
-Provides generalinterior and exterior modernizationand renovation,and conversion
of235 units. Includesupgradeof kitchenand bathrooms,doors,windows,
floor and wall fmishes,electrical,HVAC and fIre protectionsystems,
improvesfloor plans,providesincreasedenergyefficiency, and upgradespatios,
pavements,utility systems,playgroundsand recreationareas.
(SeparateDD Form 1391 attached)
-WORK ACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS:
FY2003, LJYCO04005,Install Vanity & Shelves,223 UN, $238,000
FY2003, LJYCO04008,RPR PrivacyFences,527 UN, $666,000
FY2003, LJYC034005P1,RPR ReplaceScreenDoors, 75 UN, $75,000
FY2004, LJYC034007,RPR Kitchen Cab/lnstDishwasher& Garbage
Disposal,300 UN, $525,000
FY2004, LJYC034005P2,RPR ReplaceScreenDoors, 200 UN, $240,000
FY2005, LJYC034005P3,RPR ReplaceScreenDoors, 300UN, $350,000
FY2005, LJYC044009,RPR PrivacyFences,223 UN, $300,000
-WORK PROGRAMMED FOR NEXT THREE YEARS: None
UNITED KINGDOM
RAF MILDENHALL
IMPROVE FAMIL Y HOUSING
QFQE064001
-Provides generalinterior and exteriormodernizationof 10 housingunits.
Work to include roof replacements,including underlay,utility upgradesand
additionsto meetcurrentstandards;installationof batteryoperatedand additional
hard-wiredsmokedetectors;installationof plug-in and hard-wiredcarbonmonoxide
detectors;improvementof floor plans; assessment
of and any subsequentabatement
of asbestosand lead-basedpaint. All work carried out is to comply with currentBase
Standards,Host Nation/USAFandNFPA requirements.
(SeparateDD Form 1391 attached)
-WORK ACCOMPLISHEDIN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS: None
-WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT THREE YEARS: None
CLASSIFIED LOCATION
IMPROVE INFRASTRUCTURE
PAYZ064001
-Improve housingarealandscaping,stormdrainage,waterand electricalsystems.
DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
20,081
2,038
49
PAGE NO
4 22
ii1X,t-~i2
i
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
Mn.,ITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
A separateDD Fonn 1391follows for eachPostAcquisition Constructionproject which is
over$50,000per unit (multiplied by the Area CostFactor).
February2005
PageNo.
423
This Page Intentionally
Left Blank
424
I
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(compu ter
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.
FORT MACARTHURFAMILY HOUSING ANNEX, CALIFORNIA
5.
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
CATEGORY CODE
88742
7.
711-142
-9-
DATE
PROJECT TITLE
~ROVE
FAMILY HOUSING
PROJECT NUMBER
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
HHEK034017
19,803
COST
ITEM
PRIMARY
2.
genera ted)
UNIT
UJM OUANTITY
COST
FACILITIES
LMPROVE
FAMILY
13,343
HOUSING
UNITS
UN
18H
70,971
UN
188
I
(
13,343
SUPPORTINGFACILITIES
4,968
TERMITE PEST CONTROL
SEISMIC
UPGRADE
HISTORIC
UNITS
3,000
( 564)
LS
INFRASTRUCTURE
-FORT
INFRASTRUCTURE
-PACIFIC
CREST
INFRASTRUCTURE
-PACIFIC
HEIGHTS
!-m.CARTHUR
(
LS
1
DEMOLITION-SURPLUS UNITS
(
AREA
CONTRACT
(
455)
LS
(
538)
UN
41
16,195
( 664)
916
COST
19,226
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD
(3%)
577
-19,803
FACTOR
MOST EXPENSIVE
10.
(5%)
REQUEST
COST
1,937)
18,311
SUPERVISION,
TOTAL
810)
LS
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
)
Description
1 .12
UNIT
316,171
of
Proposed
Work:
Provides
"Whole House"
renovation
of
188 housing
units,
including
six
(6) national
registered
historic
units.
Includes
upgrades
to
kitchens,
bathrooms,
mechanical
and electrical
systems.
Project
includes
infrastructure
improvement
work to existing
utilities,
site
work, asphalt
shingle
roof replacement,
stucco
cracking
repair,
new garage doors,
water line
replacement
due to foundation
settlement,
fencing,
roads
Project
includes
demolition
11.
REQUIREMENT:
and sidewalk
repair,
utility
lighting,
of (41) surplus
housing units
at Fort
572 UN
ADEQUATE: 350 UN
and playgrounds.
MacArthur.
SUBSTANDARD: 222 UN
PROJECT:
Improves
3 SNCO (3-BR),
9 JNCO (2-BR),
19 JNCO (3-BR), 15 JNCO (4-BR),
1
Historic
GOQ (4-BR), plus 5 Historic
SOQs (4-BR) on Fort MacArthur;
45 FGO (4-BR),
11
CGO (4-BR),
61 FGO (3-BR),
and 19 CGO (3-BR) at Pacific
Crest/Pacific
Heights
I.
Project
demolishes
14 JNCO (2-BR),
7 JNCO (3-BR),
8 JNCO (4-BR),
8 CGO (2-BR), and 4
CGO (3-BR) at Fort MacArthur.
REQUIREMENT: The existing
housing units
require
upgrading
to meet "Whole House"
standards
to improve units
for the next twenty-five
years.
This project
is to comply
with the Air
Force goal to revitalize
all
inadequate
units
by 2007. This is phase two of
three phases to provide
adequate housing for base personnel.
The renovated
housing
will
provide
a modern kitchen,
living
room, family
room, bedroom and bath configuration,
with
ample interior
and exterior
storage.
Project
includes
infrastructure
improvements
to
utilities,
site
work, asphalt
shingle
roof replacement,
stucco cracking
repair,
new
garage doors,
water line
replacement
due to foundation
settlement,
fencing,
roads and
sidewalk
repair,
utility
lighting,
playground
and recreation
area upgrades,
and all
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 99
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
Page No.
425
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
PROGRAMELEMENT
88742
6.
4.
CATEGORY CODE
7.
PROJECT TITLE
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING
PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
landscaping.
Additional
requirements
seismic
upgrading
of 6 historic
units.
DATE
generated)
FORT MACARTHURFAMILY HOUSING ANNEX, CALIFORNIA
S.
2.
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
HHEK034017
includes
termite
pest
19,803
control
of
188 units
and
CURRENT SITUATION:
This project
renovates
housing units
constructed
in the 1980s and
seismic
upgrading
and renovation
of 6 historic
units
(Quarter's
# 9A/B, 10A/B & 11A/B).
These historic
units
were constructed
in 1918 and have been identified
by the US Army
Corps of Engineers
(CoE) as requiring
seismic
upgrading
per the Rapid Seismic
Evaluation
of Buildings
final
report
dated July 1996. These housing units
have had no major
upgrades
since construction
and do not meet the needs of today's
families,
nor do they
provide
a modern home environment.
The roof system is in poor condition,
including
the
asphalt
shingles
(passed their
15-year
life
expectancy)
and the gutter/downspouts
(heavily
corroded).
The exterior
walls
are worn, faded,
and show signs of settlement
cracks and the windows are in need of replacement.
The mechanical
systems are in
deteriorated
condition,
with the water heater
and furnaces
in poor condition
and have
passed their
life
expectancy.
The electrical
system does not meet current
building
code
and is in need of upgrade,
with missing
ground fault
interrupter
receptacles
and hardwired smoke and carbon monoxide detectors.
Kitchens
have little
storage
and counter
space, with antiquated
cabinets
and badly worn countertops.
Vinyl
flooring
throughout
the houses are badly marred and in need of replacement.
Lighting
fixtures
are outdated
and energy
inefficient.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: The existing
housing units will
continue
to degrade and
deteriorate
with no other long range program to support
this vital
housing
area for the
men and women serving
at Los Angeles Air Force Base.
Failure
to provide
these
improvements
at Fort MacArthur,
Pacific
Crest,
and Pacific
Heights
I will
cause a severe
decrease in morale of the personnel,
and will
adversely
impact the retention
rate of
these
vi tal
Air
Force
members.
WORKACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS:
WORK PROGRAMMED
FOR NEXT THREE YEARS:
None.
None.
ADDITIONAL:
An economic analysis
has been prepared
comparing
the alternatives
of new
construction,
improvement,
and status
quo operation.
Based on the net present
values
and
benefit
of this
respective
alternative,
improvement
was found to be the most cost
effective
over the life
of the project.
The cost to improve this
housing
is 30% of
replacement
cost for Fort MacArthur
units,
19% of replacement
cost for Pacific
Crest
units,
and 20% of replacement
cost for Pacific
Heights
I units.
Most expensive
unit
identified
as Quarters
11A LOS (GOQ-4BR) with a cost to improve
at 74% of replacement
cost
(National
Registered
Historic
Unit).
Base Civil
Engineer:
Lt Col Sherry M. Bunch,
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 99
Previous
editions
(310)
363-0287
are obsolete.
Page No.
426
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTIONPROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.
USAF ACADEMY, COLORADO
5.
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
88742
7.
FAMILY HOUSING
PROJECT NUMBER
711-111
Q
DATE
PROJECT TITLE
PRIVATIZE
CATEGORY CODE
2.
generated)
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
XQPZ067270
10,082
~n.c:T
UNIT
ITEM
COST
U 1M QUANTITY
PRIMARY~CILITIES
10,082
PRIVATIZE FAMILY HOUSING
UN
445
22,656
( 10,082 )
SUPPORTINGFACILITIES
o
SUBTOTAL
10,082
TOTAL CONTRACT
COST
10,082
TOTAL REQUEST
10,082
AREA COST FACTOR
1.11
10.
Description
of Proposed Work:
Convey 1211 existing
units
and ultimately
demolish
766 units
for a privatization
end state
at the USAFA of 445 units
including
3 GOQs with
about 580 acres of land lease.
Without privatization,
MILCON cost for this
work is
$54M for an anticipated
leverage
of 12: 1 (combining
with Peterson
AFB).
Privatized
units
will
provide
modern interior
and exterior
conveniences
and meet current
space and
floor
plan
11.
REQUIREMENT: 445UN
PROJECT:
requirements.
Privatize
Military
ADEQUATE: 92UN
Family
Housing
(Current
SUBSTAND1IRD: 353UN
Mission)
REQUIREMENT: This project
is required
to provide
445 modern and efficient
housing
units
for military
members and their
dependents
stationed
at the Academy.
353 units
will
be
upgraded
or newly built
to meet current
safety
codes and to provide
a comfortable
and
appealing
living
environment
comparable
to the off -base civilian
community.
All units
will
meet "whole house" standards
and are programmed in accordance
with the Housing
Community Profile.
Renovated and newly built
housing will
provide
a modern kitchen,
liv~ng
room, family
room, bedroom and bath configuration,
with ample interior
and
exterior
storage.
Living
units
will
be expanded to meet current
space authorizations.
Single/two
car garages and off street
parking
will
be provided
where deficient.
Neighborhood
improvements
are required
and will
include
landscaping,
fences,
playgrounds
and recreations
areas. Additionally,
766 units
identified
as surplus
must be
demolished.
This project
will
be combined with Peterson AFB, Cheyene Mountain
AFS, and
Schriver
AFB for a joint
Colorado
Springs
privatization
housing project.
The entire
project
will
have a privatization
housing end state of 1,577 units
(445 units
at USAFA
and 1,132
units
at
Peterson
AFB and Schriever
AFB).
CURRENT SITUATION:
Air Force housing
in the Colorado
Springs
area, was constructed
in
the late
1950's and 1960's.
These 50-year
old houses require
major renovation
and
repair
to upgrade to current
standards
and correct
deterioration
resulting
from age.
The housing
units
have had no major repair
and upgrades
since construction
and do not
meet the needs of today's
families
and do not provide
a modern home environment.
Ki tchen and bathroom
cabinets,
plumbing,
lighting
and fixtures
are obsolete
and
deteriorated.
The housing units
have inadequate
space in the living,
dining,
family
rooms and bedrooms.
Windows, siding
and insulation
require
upgrading.
Roofs need to be
replaced.
Utility
infrastructure,
such as electrical
and sanitary
sewer systems,
need
to be upgraded
and replaced.
Storage,
patios,
and backyard
privacy
need to be enlarged
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 99
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
cO"
Page No.
~
",
~~iI
-
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
PROGRAMELEMENT
88742
6.
4.
PROJECT TITLE
PRIVATIZE
CATEGORYCODE
7.
FAMILY HOUSING
PROJECT NUMBER
711-111
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
XQPZ067270
and updated.
Carports
need to be rep1aced with garages.
systems,
fences and recreation
areas for housing
residents
10,082
Landscaping,
are deficient.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Units wi11 continue
to deteriorate
increasing
operations,
maintenance
and repair
costs to the
to residents.
Without
this project,
repair
of these units
piecemea1
fashion
with 1itt1e
or no improvement
in 1iving
Ana1ysis
shows an on-base housing
surp1us of 766 units.
WORKACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS:
units
in FY 2003.
WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT THREE YEARS:
DATE
generated)
USAF ACADEMY, COLORADO
5.
2.
sprink1er
rapidly,
resu1ting
in
Government and inconvenience
wi11 continue
in a cost1y,
qua1ity.
Housing
MILCON rep1acement/renovation
Market
of
92 housing
None.
ADDITIONAL:
This project
contains
no resa1e merchandise,
services
or commercia1
recreation
operations
or activities
IAW with the SAF/MI Housing Privatization
Interim
Operating
Instructions
memo dated 2 March 1999 and AF/IL memo regarding
coordination
with AAFES, DeCA, and MWRBoard dated 19 March 1999.
A viab1e pro forma and a
pre1iminary
economic ana1ysis wi11 be deve1oped and provided
during
the concept approva1
process,
and a certified
economic ana1ysis
wi11 be accomp1ished
prior
to comp1etion
of
the so1icitation
process.
In the event
the privatization
is financia11y
infeasib1e,
the Air Force wi11 execute an improvement
project
for 44 units
at the programmed amount
requested
by this project
IAW the insta11ation's
Housing Community Profi1e.
Base Civi1
Engineer:
Co1 Thomas Hayden, (719) 333-2660.
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 99
Previous
editions
are obso1ete.
Page No.
428
c
i..i
;
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.
PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, COLORADO
5.
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
CATEGORY CODE
88742
2.
PROJECT TITLE
PRIVATIZE
7.
FAMILY HOUSING
PROJECT NUMBER
711-
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
TDKA064006
15,124
UNIT
ITEM
U M
COST
UANTITY
PRIMARY~CILITIES
PRI~TIZE
DATE
generated)
15,124
FAMcrLYHOUSING
ASBESTOS/LEADBASEDPAINT SURVEY
UN
1132
UN
331
13,263
( 15,014 )
332
( 110)
SUPPORTINGFACILITIES
0
SUBTOTAL
15,124
TOTAL CONTRACTCOST
15,124
TOTAL REQUEST
15,124
AREA COST FACTOR
1 .11
10.
Description
of Proposed Work:
Convey 493 and construct
639 new units
for a
privatization
end state
of 1132 units
(including
22 GOQs) supporting
Peterson
AFB,
Cheyenne Mountain AFS, and Schriever
AFB.
Without
privatization,
MILCON cost to
improve,
replace,
and construct
1132 units
is $249M.
Combined with AF Academy,
estimated
leverage
is 12:1.
The land,
approximately
200 acres,
supporting
the
privatization
project
will
be leased to the developer.
The developer
will
provide
an
addi tional
50 plus acres for some of the new deficit
units.
!~'"
11.
~:.,:
PROJECT:
REQUIREMENT: 1,132UN
~,
~;i,
~:':
:~
",
~
REQUIREMENT: This project
is required
to provide
1132 modern and efficient
housing
units
for military
members and their
dependents
stationed
at Peterson
AFB, Cheyenne
Mountain
AFS, and Schriever
AFB.
The project
will
improve
334 units
to meet current
life
safety
codes and to provide
a comfortable
and appealing
living
environment
comparable
to off-base
civilian
community.
Project
will
also replace
70 inadequate
units
and construct
639 new units
to reduce deficit.
All units
will
meet whole house
standards
and are programmed in accordance
with the Housing Community Profile.
Renovated
and newly built
housing will
provide
a modern kitchen,
living
room, family
room,
bedroom,
and bath configuration,
with ample interior
and exterior
storage.
Living
units
will
be expanded to meet current
space authorizations.
This project
will
be combined
with the United
States Air Force Academy for a joint
Colorado
Springs privatization
housing project.
The entire
project
will
have a privatization
housing end state
of 1577
units
(445 units
at USAFA and 1132 units
at Peterson AFB and Schriever
AFB) .
Privatize
Peterson
ADEQUATE: 89UN
Military
Family
Housing
SUBSTANDARD: 404UN
(Current
Mission)
CURRENT SITUATION:
This project
upgrades and modernizes
Air Force housing
in the
Colorado
Springs
area, which was constructed
in the late 1950's and 1960's.
These 50year old houses require
major renovation
and repair
to upgrade to current
standards
and
correct
deterioration
resulting
from age.
The housing units
have had no major repair
and upgrades
since construction
and do not meet the needs of today' s families
and do not
provide
a modern home environment.
Kitchen
and bathroom cabinets,
plumbing,
lighting,
and fixtures
are obsolete
and deteriorated.
The housing units
have inadequate
space in
the living,
dining
and family
rooms, and bedrooms.
Windows, siding,
and insulation
require
replacement.
Roofs need to be replaced.
Utility
infrastructure,
such as
electrical
and sanitary
sewer systems,
need to be upgraded and replaced.
Storage,
DD FORM ~39~,
DEC 99
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
Page No.
429
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTIONPROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.
PETERSONAIR FORCE BASE, COLORADO
5.
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
88742
patios,
replaced
deficient.
7.
711-142
Units
will
FAMILY HOUSING
PROJECT NUMBER
8.
TDKA064006
and backyard
privacy
need to be enlarged
with garages.
Landscaping
and recreation
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
continue
DATE
PROJECT TITLE
PRIVATIZE
CATEGORYCODE
2.
generated)
and updated.
areas for
to deteriorate
PROJECT COST ($000)
15.124
Carports
need to be
housing
residents
are
rapidly,
resulting
in
increasing
operations,
maintenance,
and repair
costs.
Families
will
continue
to live
inadequa te housing
units
that do not meet the needs of today' s military
families.
Additionally,
Schriever
AFB and Peterson
AFB military
families
will
need to continue
commute over one hour to and from their
home and duty station.
Housing Requirements
Market Analysis
shows an on-base deficit
of 639 units.
WORK ACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS: MILCON whole house renovation
of 87 units
FY 2003.
MILCON construction
of two GOQ's in FY 2003.
Repair housing electrical
distribution
in FY03-FY04.
Repair and reconfigure
parking
in FY03-FY05.
WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT THREE YEARS:
in
to
and
in
None.
ADDITIONAL:
This project
contains
no resale merchandise,
services,
or commercial
recreation
operations
or activities
lAW with the SAF/MI Housing Privatization
Interim
Operating
Instructions
memo dated 2 March 1999 and AF/IL memo regarding
coordination
with AAFES, DeCA, and MWRBoard dated 19 March 1999.
A viable
pro forma and a
preliminary
economic analysis
will
be developed
and provided
during
the concept approval
process,
and a certified
economic analysis
will
be accomplished
prior
to completion
of
the solicitation
process.
In the event the privatization
is financially
infeasible,
the
Air Force will
execute
an improvement
project
for 70 JNCO town home units
at the
programmed
installation's
McCormick,
amount requested
by this privatization
project
in accordance
with the
Housing Community Profile.
Base Civil
Engineer:
Lt Col David B.
(719) 556-7633.
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 99
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
Page No.
430
1.
COMPONENT
AIR
3.
FY 2006
FORCE
BOLLING
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
INSTALLATION
s.
MILITARY
AIR
PROGRAM ELEMENT
4.
DISTRICT
6.
OF COLUMBIA
CATEGORY CODE
88742
DATA
2.
PROJECT
~ROVE
7.
PROJECT
711-144
TITLE
FAMILY
NUMBER
HOUSING
8.
PROJECT
BXUR299118
Q
DATE
generated)
AND LOCATION
FORCE BASE,
PROJECT
COST
($000)
11,090
,..n~'"
UNIT
ITEM
U/M
COST
OUANTITY
PRIMARYFACILITIES
10,163
IMPROVE 24 GOQs & GARAGES
UN
24
423,470
1
I
( 10,163
SUPPORTINGFACILITIES
ASBESTOS & LEAD-BASE PAINT REMOVAL
UN
24
3,800
(
SUBTOTAL
91)
10,254
CONTINGENCY
(5%)
513
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
10,767
SUPERVISION, INSPECTIONAND OVERHEAD
(3%)
323
TOTAL REQUEST
11,090
AREA COST FACTOR
.
1 .02
EFFECTIVE STATUTORY LIMIT
10.
)
91
Description
of
o
Proposed
Work:
Improve
24
GOQs housing
units
with
all
necessary
amenities
and supporting
facilities.
Project
includes
interior
and exterior
modernization,
utility
upgrade,
additions
to meet current
standards.
Renovates kitchens,
bathrooms,
and floor
coverings.
Upgrade electrical,
plumbing
and lighting
systems to
increase
efficiency
and improve safety.
Includes
asbestos
& lead-based
paint
removal.
11.
REQUIREMENT:
PROJECT:
bring
up
and
Air
Force
and
the
66 year
The
Improvement
them
repairs
968
to
on
current
improves
old
GOQ units
current
24 GOQ units.
This
contemporary
and
is
are
and
not
of
project
meet
obsolete
and
Air
are
the
Force
not
to
project
with
and
functional.
for
contemporary
All
major
GOQs to
project
guidance
Housing
Plan
24
This
follows
General
460
modernize
standards.
accordance
with
current
required
living
This
in
consistant
SUBSTANDARD:
is
units.
programmed
Analysis,
do
systems
Force
efficiency
Plan,
Market
508
Air
energy
GOQ Master
Housing
ADEQUATE:
also
in
Community
Bolling
the
Plan,
AFB.
living
The
standards.
systems
are
from
the
original
construction.
The plaster
wall
and ceiling
systems are failing.
The electrical
and mechanical
systems are from original
construction.
The minor modifications
to the
systems have left
them in a hodge podge state.
Kitchens
require
alteration
to provide
ample space for kitchen
work centers.
Repair/restoration
is needed on fireplaces,
floors,
door trims,
and stair
rails.
REQUIREMENT:
Officers
standards
GOQ Master
bedroom,
Project
and
their
and
are
Plan.
and
bath
is
required
dependents
at
programmed
in
The
will
design
configuration,
to
provide
Bolling
accordance
All
w~th
provide
with
modern
AFB.
the
a modern
ample
interior
and
units
efficient
will
Hous~ng
kitchen,
and
housing
meet
modern
Commun~ty
liv~ng
exterior
for
Prof~le
room,
storage.
General
housing
and
family
Un~ts
be provided
with a two car garage,
350 SF patio,
and exter~or
park~ng for other
vehicles.
Adequate ~nfrastructure
support
for roads and util~ties
shall
also be
prov~ded.
This ~s one phase of a multiphase
initiative
to renovate
37 GOQ hous~ng
for
Bolling
DD FORM 1391,
AFB.
Housing
DEC 99
Commun~ty
Plan
Prev~ous
and
editions
Housing
Market
are obsolete.
Analys~s
are
the
room,
elements
Page No.
will
.
units
of
the
431
--
1.
AIR
3.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
FORCE
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
4.
88742
General
Plan
OF COLUMBIA
CATEGORY CODE
for
Bolling
PROJECT TITLE
7.
PROJECT NUMBER
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
BXUR299118
AFB, and are
the
DATE
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING
711-144
CURRENTSITUATION:
show the effects
of
2.
generated)
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
BOLLING AIR FORCE BASE, DISTRICT
5.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
basis
for
this
11,090
project.
These existing
housing units
were constructed
in the 1930s.
age and heavy use.
They have had no major upgrades
since
They
construction,
and they do not meet the needs of today' s families,
nor do they provide
a
modern home environment.
Roof, wall,
foundations
and exterior
pavements require
major
repair
or replacement
due to age.
Plumbing and electrical
systems are antiquated
and do
not meet current
standards
for efficiency
and safety.
Interiors
are generally
inadequate
by modern criteria.
Bathrooms are small and bedrooms lack adequate
closet
space.
Kitchens
have insufficient
cabinets,
storage
and counter space.
Lighting,
heating
and air conditioning
systems require
upgrade and replacement.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
increasing
residents.
Units
will
operations,
maintenance
Without
this project,
continue
to
deteriorate
piecemeal
fashion
with little
or no improvement
in
WORKACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS: None
WORK PROGRAlon-1ED
FOR NEXT THREE YEARS:
ADDITIONAL:
Project
includes
site
rapidly,
living
DEC 99
in
None
preparation,
Previous
to
quality.
two car garages,
energy conserving
features,
parking,
exterior
patios
and privacy
infrastructure
of roads,
utilities,
recreation
areas,
landscaping,
demolition.
Demolition
work will
include
demolition
of pavilions
Civil
Engineer:
Lt Col Dennis Janinski,
(202) 767-5565.
DD FORM 1391,
resulting
and repair
to the government
and inconvenience
repair
of these units
will
continue
in a costly
editions
are obsolete.
air
conditioning,
fencing,
support
asbestos
removal,
and
and carports.
Base
Page No.
432
I
1.
COMPONENT
AIR
3.
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
INSTALLATION
MACDILL
5.
FY 2006
FORCE
AIR
AND LOCATION
FORCE BASE,
PROGRAM ELEMENT
4.
FLORIDA
6.
7.
2.
DATE
TITLE
FAMILY
PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
9
DATA
PROJECT
IMPROVE
CATEGORY CODE
88742
PROJECT
generated)
HOUSING,
8.
PHASE G
PROJECT
NVZR043712Rl
COST
($000)
2,246
~n~T
UNIT
ITEM
COST
U 1M OUANTITY
WHOLE HOUSE RENOVATIONS
2,077
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING
UN
5
415,349
( 2,077
SUPPORTINGFACILITIES
0
SUBTOTAL
2,077
CONTINGENCY
(5 %)
104
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION,
2,181
INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD
(3 %)
65
TOTAL REQUEST
2,246
AREA COST FACTOR
.89
MOST EXPENSIVE UNIT
10.
402,
the
495,000
Description
of Proposed Work:
403, 404 and 405 through
whole
units
)
to
contemporary
Improve General
house (interior
standards.
Work
Officer
Quarter
(GOQ) units
401,
and exterior)
renovations
to bring
includes
upgrading
bathroom
and
laundry
room
fixtures
and finishes;
repairing
or replacing
exterior
stucco wall finish;
replacing
windows and frames;
replacing
exterior
door hardware;
replacing
water heater
and HVAC
system and its controls;
installing
electrical
service
disconnects
and smoke detectors;
replacing
closet
shelving;
reconfiguring
the kitchen
eating
area and laundry
room;
upgrading
3 bathrooms;
repairing
water
replacing
wood soffit;
constructing
patio
and privacy
fences.
11.
REQUIREMENT:
infiltration
2-car
485 UN
problems
garages
with
ADEQUATE:
at
bulk
chimney
storage;
301 UN
and
repairing
and replacing
SUBSTANDARD:
or
the
184 UN
PROJECT:
Improves
5 GOQs through
whole-house
renovations.
Units
are located
at 2106,
2112, 2132 and 2136 Staff
Circle
and 7706 Bayshore Boulevard,
MacDill
AFB, Florida.
REQUIREMENT:
Deputy
Provide
Commander,
Commander,
United
Mobility
Wing.
upgrade
outdated
Additionally,
living
States
Repairs
will
comply
environment
of
infrastructure
commensurate
Central
Special
Command
Operations
are required
to
systems
in
water
damage;
life
safety
codes;
to
the off-base
comparable
These
historic
places.
are
necessary.
units,
and
Primary
and
with
air
provide
civilian
in
the rapidly
secondary
position
of
Commander
(USSOCOM)
accordance
built
to
the
deficiencies
prevent
originally
Repairs
with
(USCENTCOM),
Command
correct
repair
with
CURRENT SITUATION:
register
quarters
Stated
infrastructure
it
efficiency;
adequate
United
and
in
Commander
and
Commander,
the
floor
GOQ Master
and
Deputy
6th
plan
Air
and to
Plan.
infiltration,
increase
a comfortable
and
energy
appealing
environment.
1941,
are
decaying
electric,
eligible
for
the
national
and outdated
telephone,
cable,
and
TV
lines
are fed overhead and should be buried
due to high windstorms
in the local
area.
Each facility
needs to be gutted
back to cinder block construction.
Units shall
then
have the following
improvements:
new insulation
installed;
electrical
wiring
(including
GFCI breakers/receptacles
as required);
alarm (fire,
security,
and carbon monoxide
sensors)
wiring;
phone lines;
cable lines;
plumbing;
gas lines;
interior
duct work;
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 99
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No.
~:J:I
1.
AIR
3.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
FORCE
CONSTRUCTIONPROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
88742
DATE
generated)
4.
MA.CDILL AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA
5.
2.
PROJECT TITLE
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING, PHASE G
CATEGORYCODE
7.
711-142
PROJECT NUMBER
8.
NVZR043712R1
PROJECT COST ($000)
2,246
interior
walls;
carpet;
ceilings;
mylar windows;
sliding
glass doors;
exterior
door
hardware;
and interior
painting.
The exterior
stucco wall
finish
is cracked
and
flashings
have deteriorated.
The wooden soffits
and fascia
are rotted.
Existing
woodwork throughout
each unit
has accumulated
many layers
of lead-based
paint.
The
mechanical
systems require
continual
maintenance
and do not meet Federal
efficiency
standards
due to the original
duplex
configuration
of exterior
placement
of ducts
(with
no insulation),
bulkheads
and condensing
units.
The wooden privacy
fence has
deteriorated
and doesn't
match the architectural
style
of home.
Many outlets
are not
grounded properly
and do not meet current
building
code requirements.
The metal roofed
carports
detract
from the homes appearance
and need to be replaced
with garages.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Aging systems that have already
cycle
will
require
increased
maintenance
attention
and
discomfort.
Unit accommodations
will
continue
to lack
that are expected
and commensurate
to the positions
of
efficiency
of these units
will
continue
to degrade and
safety
codes.
WORKACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS:
WORK PROGRAMMED
FOR NEXT THREE YEARS:
ADDITIONAL:
An economic
analysis
exceeded their
useful
life
create
occupant
inconvenience
and
the distinctiveness
and amenities
these Commanders.
The energy
they will
not meet fire
and
None
None
has been prepared
comparing
the
alternatives
of
new
construction,
improvement,
and status
quo operation.
Based on the net present
values
and benefits
of the respective
alternatives,
improvement
was found to be the most cost
effective
over the life
of the project.
The cost to improve the units
ranges
from 88%
to 109% of the replacement
cost.
However, because they are Historic,
the GOQ Master
Plan and Individual
Facility
Profiles
recommend improvement.
Supervision
and Inspection
will
be provided
by Chugach Management Services
Inc.,
resulting
in an SIOH of 3%.
Base
Civil
Engineer:
Lt Col Anthony A. Foti,
(813) 828-3577
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 99
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
Page No.
'"434~
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006
MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
(computer
INSTALLATION
MOUNTAIN
s.
CONSTRUCTION
4.
FORCE BASE,
PROGRAM E~
6.
IDAHO
88742
PROJECT
IMPROVE
CATEGORY CODE
DATA
2.
DATE
generated)
AND LOCATION
HOME AIR
PROJECT
7.
TITLE
FAMILY
PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
HOUSING
8.
PROJECT
COST
QYZH681083
($000)
4,026
-9.-~
UNIT
ITEM
COST
U1M _QUANTITY
PRIMARYEACILITIES
FAM HSG
1,412
(DWELLINGS) APPR FY06
UN
12
90,345
UN
12
27,289
( 1,084
1
HOUSINGSPECIAL CONSTRUCTION
SUPPORTINGFACILITIES
SITE
2,215
LS
(
733)
LANDSCAPE
LS
(
327)
UTILITY
LS
(
329)
IMPROVEMENT
(
251)
M1I.INS
STREET
LS
RECREATION
EA
12
500
( 6)
ENVIRONMENTAL
LS
(
110)
OTHER SITE WORK
LS
(
175)
ROCK EXCAVATION/REl.KJV:AL
LS
(
242)
DEMOLITION
EA
12
3,580
( 43)
SUBTOTAL
3,627
CONTINGENCY
(5%)
181
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION,
3,808
INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD
(5.7
%)
217
TOTAL REQUEST
4,026
AREA COST EACTOR
1 .11
MOST EXPENSIVE UNIT
10.
Description
Renovation.
floor
master
room
floor
for
those
on
bedroom,
install
4th
kitchen,
Plan
units
in
to
the
lower
and
dining
with
to
a 3 bedroom
1769
(1500
NSF
housing
11.
unit
GSF which
and
between
1860
GSF)
unit.]
Special
REQUIREMENT:
PROJECT:
because
is
Improve
of
the
for
their
size.
an improved
construction
Housing.
the
the
inclusion
existing
Wn?le
to
the
2nd
existing
of
on
the
be added that
The
unit
NSF and
bulk
ADEQUATE:
Family
enclose
arrangement
will
through
a bathroom
a family
lower
replicates
carport
is
to
be
a single
car garage,
storage
area and
are being downsized
from a 4 bedroom unit
3 bedroom
includes
1,324UN
Military
(1350
units
add
for
room
overhang
Each
benchmark
floor
subdivision.
replaced
with
a combination
unit
consisting
of
trash
enclosure
at each unit.
These 12 units
story
to
bedroom #3,
on
the
two
proposes
room
A new porch
renovated
12 existing
closet
bedroom
living
efficiency.
other
upgrade
Suitability
a larger
the
the
better
Work:
HCP House
eliminate
relocate
the
Proposed
The
room,
and
97,600
of
House
laundry
)
( 327)
currently
contains
1670
and
Senior
GSF)
Non-Commissioned
storage
areas,
661UN
This
the
patios,
1408
12 SNCO units.
size
Officer
(SNCO)
decks
SUBSTANDARD:
upgrades
NSF and
maximum
etc.
663UN
(Current
Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
DD FORM 1391,
This
project
DEC 99
is
required
Previous
to
provide
editions
modern
and
are obsolete.
efficient
housing
for
Page No.
435
--
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(compu ter
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.
MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE BASE, IDAHO
5.
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
7.
PROJECT TITLE
PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
QYZH681083
military
members and their
dependents
stationed
All units
will
meet modern Whole House standards
Housing Community
living
environment
DATE
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING
CATEGORYCODE
88742
2.
genera ted)
Profile.
Renovate housing
comparable
to the off-base
4,026
at Mountain
Home Air Force Base (MHAFB).
and programming
in accordance
with the
to provide
civilian
a comfortable
and appealing
community.
Provide
modern
kitchens,
living
rooms, dining
rooms, bath configurations
and three bedrooms as
identified
in the most recent
Housing Community Profile.
Construct
ample interior
and
exterior
storage
areas,
enclosed
garages and a trash
containment
area.
Upgrade the
basic electrical
systems for these units
starting
with the service
disconnect
and the
electrical
panel.
Perform lead and asbestos
abatement
as required.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The current
two story
housing
units
were
constructed
in
1948 and are
structurally
sound but have never been Whole House renovated.
The other
48 units
in
this
subdivision
were renovated
in 1997.
These 12 units
are in unsatisfactory
condition
due to the affects
of age and heavy use.
Efficiency
and safety
deficiencies
include
infrastructure
electrical,
plumbing
and ventilation
systems;
antiquated
kitchens
and
bathrooms;
lead paint
and asbestos
containing
materials;
deteriorating
kitchen/bathroom
cabinets,
sinks and inadequate
counter
space. The existing
electrical
system and its
components have exceeded normal life
expectancy
plus the wiring
is not grounded per
current
code.
The exterior
brick
veneer needs to be repointed
(refill
the masonry
joints).
The existing
units
have a single
vehicle
carport
of minimum size.
Storage
is
located
in a small damp, musty basement with the furnaces
and hot water heaters.
Inadequate
trash
IMPACT IF
enclosure
NOT PROVIDED:
can not
Air
Force
hold
two
30 gallon
families
will
housing
conditions.
As the existing
units
increase.
With antiquated
living
conditions
main tenance/ repair,
low morale and retention
are permitted
to continue.
ADDITIONAL:
An economical
analysis
Engineer
DD FORM 1391,
Commander is Lt.
that
DEC 99
Col.
Previous
in
unsatisfactory
None
compared
cost.
This renovated
housing will
impact the local
school district.
contract
management and supervision
Squadron
live
None
status-quo
alternatives
toward providing
the
results
found that Whole House renovation
is
Eagle View units
over the life
of the project.
replacement
negatively
to provide
to
age, the maintenance
costs on these units
and constant
attention
to
problems
can be expected
if such conditions
WORK ACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS:
WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT THREE YEARS:
containers.
continue
Scott
editions
all
construction;
renovation
and
best quality
military
family
housing.
The
the most cost effective
option
for these 12
The improvement
cost is 66% of the
not increase
the student
population
The Corps of Engineers
will
be the
of this project.
The 366th Civil
R. Jarvis,
(208)
or
agency
828-6353.
are obsolete.
Page No.
-436
"'"'~."
",,
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
4.
7.
PROJECT NUMBER
711-143
9
PROJECT TITLE
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING
CATEGORY CODE
88742
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
PRQE069001
699
co.c;or
UNIT
ITEM
PRIMARY
DATE
generated)
MCCONNELL AIR FORCE BASE, KANSAS
5.
2.
U/M
COST
nUANTITY
FACILITIES
239
FAM HSG APPR 50-69
UN
3
79,605
( 239)
SUPPORTINGFACILITIES
391
PAVEMENTS
LS
(
177)
SIDEWALKS
LS
(
10)
LANDSCAPING
LS
(
12)
STORM/SANITARY
LS
(
28)
LS
(
30)
STREETLIGHTING
LS
( 34)
ELECTRICAL
LS
(
89)
LS
(
11)
2-CAR
DRAINAGE
UPGRADE
GARAGES
UPGRADE
COMMUNICATIONS
SUBTOTAL
629
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
( 5 %)
CONTRACT
SUPERVISION,
TOTAL
AREA
31
COST
661
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD
(5.7
')
38
REQUEST
COST
699
FACTOR
MOST EXPENSIVE
.98
UNIT
98,000
10.
Description
of Proposed Work:
Improves
3 housing units.
Inc~udes pavement for
streets
near west gate and off-street
parking
in this area, e~ectrica~
service,
communications,
mechanica~ and structura~
upgrades to meet current
~oca~ bui~ding
code
crJ." terJ. " a and S r ate of V-'n "'a "' -i nim,.m
h o"ei nrT o.,or ~.., ...r; "or.; a ,...~r~"'o~
1..';
1..o- S ,
-L~
--~---~
---~---~
-r-~
bathrooms,
~iving
areas,
provides
garage additions,
additiona~
c~oset storage
capacity,
rep~acement
doors and mo~ding,
rep~acement
of dated ~ighting
fixtures;
constructed
fire
protection
enc~osures
around gas fired
furnaces
and hot water heaters;
inc~udes
asbestos/~ead
based paint abatement,
radon gas venti~ation,
provides
improved driveways;
constructs
a neighborhood
access road; provides
trees for ~andscape screening,
provides
rep~acement
underground
e~ectrica~
feeds from transformers
to housing units,
constructs
neighborhood
sidewa~ks,
road crossings,
and street
lighting.
11.
REQUIREMENT:
189UN
ADEQUATE: 186UN
SUBSTANDARD: 3UN
PROJECT:
Improve Mi~itary
Fami~y Housing.
Work includes
3 Senior Officer
units,
3001 Winfie~d,
3002 Winfie~d,
and 3003 Winfield
and infrastructure
Winfield
and improves neighborhoods.
(Current
Mission)
four-bedroom
~ocated in the
REQUIREMENT: This project
is required
to provide
modern and efficient
housing
for
senior
officers
and their
dependents
at McConne~~ Air Force Base.
The housing
must be
upgraded
to meet current
~ife safety
codes and to provide
a comfortable
and appea~ing
living
environment
comparab~e to housing in the off-base
civi~ian
community.
Al~ units
must meet who~e house standards
in accordance
with the Housing Community Plan.
Houses
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 99
Previous
editions
are obso~ete.
Page No.
::\
,,-'
437
-"-
1.
AIR
3.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
FORCE
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
88742
DATE
generated)
4.
MCCONNELL AIR FORCE BASE, KANSAS
5.
2.
PROJECT TITLE
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING
CATEGORY CODE
7.
PROJECT NUMBER
711-143
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
PRQE069001
699
.
require
modern kitchens,
efficient
floor
plans,
bathrooms,
and living
areas with ample
interior
and exterior
storage.
Two vehicle
capacity
garages and off street
parking
are
needed.
Asbestos
containing
materials,
lead based paint
and domestic
water lead content
and radon remediation
is likely.
Neighborhood
suitability
requires
landscaping,
visual
screening
of transformers,
landscape
enhancement
of
common areas
Neighborhood
safety
requires
underground
housing electrical
located
at a safe depth,
adequate sidewalks,
safe crossings
Storm drainage
adequacy and sanitary
system inspection
are
problems
need to be corrected.
and streets.
feeds that
are protected
and
across high traffic
streets.
needed, inflow,
infiltration
CURRENT SITUATION:
Current
Senior Officer
Housing quarters
were constructed
in 1956.
Though the houses are structurally
sound, renovation
is needed to ensure modern and safe
living
environment
for Air Force members and their
families.
Existing
air conditioning
and heating
systems are not energy efficient
and do not adequately
heat and cool some
living
areas within
the houses.
The existing
electrical
system consists
of inadequate
electrical
panels,
electrical
wiring
that does not meet modern grounding
standards
and
is unsafe.
Bathrooms,
kitchens
and living
areas contain
fixtures,
door trim,
and other
accouterments
that are mismatched
or out of date.
Carports
are currently
available
to
the residents
in lieu
of modern two vehicle
garages,
which is the minimum standard
for
all
new housing
construction
in the local
off-base
area.
Off-street
visitor
parking
is
a necessity
in the SOQ area, but is not available
to support
team building
functions.
Neighborhoods
are stark without
appropriately
landscaped
streets
and common areas with
aesthetic
screening
of transformers,
tree lined
streets,
safe cross walks.
Existing
neighborhood
safety
concerns include
existing
underground
electrical
feeds to the
housing
units
that are of insufficient
depth and lack of sufficient
cross walks and
sidewalks
along the streets.
Storm and sewer drainage
systems require
study and repairs
as needed.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
disrepair
resulting
inconvenience
to the
to be piecemeal
and
to the interiors
of
neighborhoods
will
electrical
safety
Units
will
continue
inefficient
continue
to have a stark appearance,
insufficient
issues and sanitary,
storm sewer deficiencies.
WORK ACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS:
WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT THREE YEARS:
ADDITIONAL:
to be outdated,
and in
in increased
operations
costs,
frequent
maintenance
and repair,
and
residents.
Without
the project,
repair
of the units
will
continue
inefficient
with numerous interruptions
of the occupants
for access
the houses and no major improvement
in living
quality.
The housing
An economic
analysis
crosswalks,
None
None
has been prepared
comparing
the
alternatives
of
new
construction,
improvement,
and status
quo.
Based upon the net present
values
and
benefits
of the respective
alternatives,
improvement was found to be the most cost
effective
option
over the life
of the project.
The improvement
project
cost is 58% of
the replacement
project
cost for the work required.
The construction
agent for this
project
is the Army Corps of Engineers
resulting
in SIOB costs of 5.7%.
The Base Civil
Engineer
is Lt Col Barry Briesmaster
III,
316-759-5750.
DD FORM 1391,
Ii
DEC 99
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
Page No.
~:J1i
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006
MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
INSTALLATION
ANDREWS AIR
5.
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
AND LOCATION
FORCE BASE,
PROGRAM ELEMENT
4.
MARYLAND
6.
DATA
PROJECT
Dfi'ROVE
CATEGORY CODE
88742
PROJECT
2.
7.
TITLE
FAMILY
PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
HOUSING
8.
PH6
PROJECT
AJXF064006
Q
DATE
generated)
COST
($000)
28,216
r'n~...
UNIT
ITEM
U/M
COST
QUANTITY
PRIMARYEACILITIES
18,007
IMPROVE JNCO/CGO QUARTERS PH 2
tJN
178 1
101,165
( 18,007
SUPPORTINGFACILITIES
UTILITIES
LS
( 1,602)
PAVEMENTS
LS
(
1,320)
SITE
LS
(
1,157)
IMPROVEMENTS
LANDSCAPING
LS
(
RECREATIONFACILITIES
LS
( 749)
DEMOLITION & ASBESTOS/LBP REMOVAL
LS
(
420)
COMMUNICATIONS
LS
(
356)
(
700)
(
150)
GARAGES/PATIOS
LS
HANDICAPPED ADAPTABLE REQUIREIo!ENTS
tJN
10
15,000
SUBTOTAL
890)
25,351
CONTINGENCY
(5%)
1,268
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
26,619
SUPERVISION, INSPECTIONAND OVERHEAD
(6%)
1,597
TOTAL REQUEST
28,216
AREA COST FACTOR
1 .02
MOST EXPENSIVE tJNIT
10.
)
7,344
Description
184,000
of
Proposed
Work:
Improve
152
JNCO and
26 CGO quarters,
with
all
necessary
amenities
and supporting
facilities.
Project
includes
inter~or
~~d exterior
modernization,
and utility
upgrade.
Renovate roof,
structural/foundation/exterior
walls,
structural/other
building
elements,
mechanical,
electrical,
general,
all kitchen,
baths,
1aundry,
sitework,
pavements,
recreation
facilities,
landscaping
and signage.
Inc1udes
demolition
11.
of
30
surp1us
REQUIREMENT:
PROJECT:
Improve
two-bedroom
mi1itary
modern
Plan.
This
housing
to
living
room,
Force
Fami1y
will
the
built
DD FORM 1391,
in
and
This
1973
830UN
includes
to
programmed
civilian
SUBSTANDARD:
152
276UN
JNCO two-bedroom,
in
bath
be
These
Previous
and
Andrews
The
with
and
appea1ing
design
wi11
178
units
editions
as
units
are
In
that
all
are
housing
A1l
units
the
and
configuration.
constructed
efficient
AFB.
accordance
comfortab1e,
includes
1974.
modern
at
community.
and
some will
project
and
provide
stationed
a safe,
bedroom
Guide,
DEC 99
are
provide
room,
Housing
phase
required
dependents
off-base
family
CURRENT SITUATION:
duplexes
is
their
standards
This
26 CGO
Mission)
project
and
housing
comparab1e
ADEQUATE:
Housing.
(Current
members
The
1,106UN
Fami1y
units.
REQUIREMENT:
units.
Housing
1iving
provide
are
located
obsolete.
two
on
meet
Community
environment
a modern
accordance
handicapped
for
wi11
with
kitchen,
the
Air
adaptab1e.
story
the
west
and
one
side
story
of
Page
Andrews
N°.4
39
.,
-
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
4.
7.
PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
AFB and have had no major
upgrades
PROJECT TITLE
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING PH6
CATEGORYCODE
88742
DATE
generated)
ANDREWSAIR FORCE BASE, MARYLAND
5.
2.
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
AJXF064006
s~nce
construct~on,
28,216
and they
do not
meet the
needs
of
today's
enl~sted/off~cer
famil~es,
nor do they prov~de
a modern home env~ronment.
Plumb~ng and electr~cal
systems are ant~quated
and do not meet current
standards
for
eff~c~ency
and safety.
Inter~ors
are ~nadequate
by modern cr~ter~a.
Bathrooms
are
minimally
s~zed for f~xtures
and there ~s a lack of closet
space. L~ght~ng,
heat~ng and
a~r condit~on~ng
systems requ~re upgrade and/or replacement.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Air Force members and famil~es
w~ll cont~nue
to be ~nadequately
housed.
Un~ts w~ll
cont~nue to deter~orate
result~ng
~n escalat~ng
operat~ons,
ma~ntenance
and repa~r costs to the Government.
WORK ACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS:
WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT THREE YEARS:
ADDITIONAL:
An economic
analys~s
None
None
has been prepared
compar~ng
the
al terna t~ ves of
new
construct~on,
improvement
and status
quo operat~ons.
Based on the net present
values
and
benef~ts
of the respect~ve
alternat~ves,
improvement
was found to the most cost
eff~c~ent
over the l~fe
of the project.
The cost to improve
these un~ts ~s 64% of the
replacement
Eng~neer~ng
BASE CIVIL
DD FORM 1391
cost.
The construct~on
agent for th~s project
Command result~ng
~n SIOH of 6 percent.
ENGINEER: Lt Col
'
DEC 99
Denn~s D. Yates
Prev~ous
edit~ons
~s the Naval
Fac~l~t~es
(301 981-7281)
are obsolete.
Page No.
440
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.
POPE AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH CAROLINA
5.
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
CATEGORYCODE
88742
2.
DATE
generated)
PROJECT TITLE
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING (PHASE A)
7.
711-
PROJECT NUMBER
8.
PROJECT COST ($OOO)
TMKHO64002
16,625
UNIT
ITEM
U M
COST
UJlNTITY
PRIMARY FACILITIES
IMPROVE
FAMILY
12,780
HOUSING
(PHASE
A)
UN
138
1
SUPPORTINGFACILITIES
PAVEMENTS
LS
LS
LANDSCAPING
(
PAINT
ABATEMENT
LS
(
LS
( 5 %)
749
15,728
(5.7%)
897
REQUEST
16,625
COST FACTOR
MOST EXPENSIVE
160)
( 40)
COST
SUPERVISION, INSPECTIONAND OVERHEAD
AREA
75)
14,980
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
125)
(
SUBTOTAL
CONTRACT
)
800)
(
LS
DEMOLITION
TOTAL
12,780
( 1,000)
LS
FACILITIES
ASBESTOS/LEAD-BASED
(
2,200
UTILITIES
RECREATION
92,605
.88
UNIT
165,000
~O. Description
of Proposed Work:
Provides
general
interior
and exterior
modernization
and renovation
of 138 housing units.
Includes
utility
upgrades
and additions
to meet
current
standards.
Upgrade kitchens,
bathrooms,
and floor
coverings,
improves floor
p~ans, provides
increased
energy efficiency,
privacy
fencing,
patios,
playgrounds
and
recreation
areas.
Replaces existing
overhead electrical
distribution
with an
underground
system and replaces
sewer system.
Constructs
an additional
housing
access
road and demolishes
four units
in way of the road.
Includes
demolition
and
asbestos/lead-based
paint removal.
~1.
REQUIREMENT:
843UN
ADEQUATE: 293 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 334 UN
PROJECT: Improve Military
Family Housing
(Phase A).
This phase includes
work for 12
JNCO two-bedroom,
77 JNCO three-bedroom,
17 JNCO four-bedroom,
17 SNCO three-bedroom,
and 15 SNCO four-bedroom
units.
40 of these units
are located
in the Hillcrest
neighborhood
and 98 are located
in the Cardinal
Heights
neighborhood
(Current
Mission).
REQUIREMENT: This project
is required
to provide
modern and efficient
housing
for
military
members and their
dependents
stationed
at Pope AFB.
The housing
must be
upgraded
to meet current
life
safety
codes and to provide
a comfortable
and appealing
living
environment
comparable
to the off-base
civilian
community.
This is the first
of
multiple
phases to upgrade 334 houses.
All
units will
meet "whole house" standards
and
are programmed in accordance with the Housing Community Plan, phase A.
Renovated
housing will
provide
a modern kitchen,
living
room, family
room, bedroom and bath
configuration,
with ample interior
and exterior
storage.
Living
units
will
be expanded
to meet current
space authorizations.
Garages and off street
parking
will
be provided
DD FORM 1391,
';'
DEC 99
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
Page NO".
"",.
441
".
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTIONPROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
PROGRAMELEMENT
88742
where deficient.
6.
4.
2.
DATE
PROJECT TITLE
:IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING (PHASE A)
CATEGORY CODE
7.
PROJECT NUMBER
711-111
Neighborhood
"-r;~:'.
generated)
POPE AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH CAROLINA
5.
;f:,~~
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
TMKH064002
improvements
are required
playgrounds,
recreation
areas,
burial
of existinq
replacement
of sewer system,
and construction
of
Hi1lcrest
neighborhood.
16,625
and will
include
overhead electrical
an additional
access
landscaping,
distribution,
road to the
CURRENT SITUATION:
This project
upgrades and modernizes
housing
that was constructed
in
1964 and 1976.
These
houses require
major renovation
and repair
to correct
deterioration
resulting
from age and heavy use.
They do not meet the needs of today's
families,
nor do they provide
a modern home environment.
Kitchen
and bathroom
cabinets
and fixtures
are obsolete
and deteriorated.
Plumbing and lighting
fixtures
are
deteriorated
and dated.
The electrical
systems do meet modern construction
codes.
Ground Fault
Circuit
Interrupter
protection
is not provided
for bathrooms,
kitchens,
and
exterior
circuits.
Windows, siding,
and insulation
require
replacement.
Many of the
units
have inadequate
living
space and storage,
and no patio
or backyard privacy.
Landscaping
and recreation
areas for housing residents
are deficient.
Pavements are in
disrepair
and the Hillcrest
housing
area requires
an additional
access road to alleviate
congestion
and improve emergency vehicle
response times.
:IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Units will
continue
to deteriorate
rapidly,
resulting
in
increasing
operations,
maintenance
and repair
to the Government and inconvenience
to
residents.
Without
this project,
repair
of these units
will
continue
in a costly,
piecemeal
fashion
with little
or no improvement
in living
quality.
Housing Requirements
Market Analysis
shows an on-base housing deficit
of 216 units.
WORKACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS:
WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT THREE YEARS:
None
None
ADDITIONAL:
An economic analysis
has been prepared
comparing
the alternatives
of new
construction,
improvement,
and status
quo operation.
Based on the net present
values
and benefits
of the respective
alternatives,
improvement
was found to be the most cost
effective
over the life
of the project.
The cost to improve the units
is 60% of the
replacement
cost.
The construction
agent is the Army Corps of Engineers,
resulting
in
SIOH costs of 5.7%.
Base Civil
Engineer:
Lt Ccl ~~chael R. Bass,
(910) 394-2561.
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 99
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
Page No.
442
..-
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
4.
7.
711-143
~
PROJECT TITLE
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING
CATEGORYCODE
88742
DATE
generated)
ARNOLD AIR FORCE BASE, TENNESSEE
5.
2.
PROJECT NUMBER
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
ANZY064001
1,930
~T
UNIT
ITEM
COST
U/M ~UANTITY
PRIMARYFACILITIES
1,086
IMPROVE
ARNOLD
VILLAGE
MIL
FAMILY
IMPROVE
ARNOLD
VILLAGE
MIL
FAM HOUSING
HOUSING
UN
241
UN
16
1
12,600
(
48,998
(
302)
784)
SUPPORTINGFACILITIES
COMMON NEIGHBORHOOD
653
IMPROVEMENT
LS
GROUP GARAGES
(
LS
(
UTILITIES
LS
(
PAVEMENTS
LS
ASBESTOS/LEAD-BASED
PAINT
ABATEMENT
LS
(
AREA
87
COST
1,826
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD
(5.7
%)
104
REQUEST
1,930
FACTOR
MOST EXPENSIVE
10.
.89
UNIT
Description
53,400
of
Proposed
Work:
Provide
housing
and neighborhood
housing units.
Replace roofs,
repair
damage to exterior,
trash enclosures,
increase
unit
size,
upgrade mechanical
to privacy
fencing.
Air
11.
Conditioning:
improvement
for
40
convert/construct
garages,
add
systems,
and upgrade chain-link
0 Tons
REQUIREMENT:
PROJECT:
172)
(5%)
CONTRACT
COST
99)
1,739
SUPERVISION,
TOTAL
191)
(
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
9O)
101)
Improve
40UN
40 family
ADEQUATE: OUN
housing
units,
community
SUBSTANDARD: 40UN
area,
add Selp-Help
facility
REQUIREMENT: Project
Composition:
3 SOQ (4BR), lEg (4BR) , 2 FGO (4BR), 1 CGO (4BR) , 1
SNCO (4BR), 2 JNCO (4BR), 4 FGO (3BR) , 9 CGO (3BR), 7 SNCO (3BR) , 10 JNCO (3BR). This
project
is required
to provide
modern, efficient
housing
and community atmosphere
for
military
family
members and their
dependants
stationed
at Arnold AFB. The housing
must
be upgraded
to provide
a comfortable
and appealing
living
environment
comparable
to offbase civilian
housing.
There are 24 units
that require
repairs
such as roof replacement
and exterior
painting.
The remaining
16 units
require
utility
upgrades,
additions
to
living
space,
and trash enclosures.
This effort
will
also increase
off street
parking
as
well
as provide
much needed changes in wastewater,
water supply and electrical
wiring.
There are 12 units
that require
removal of deteriorated
parquet
flooring
that buckles
in
moist conditions.
Many improvements
are detailed
in Arnold AFB Housing Community Profile
(HCP) .
CURRENT SITUATION:
housing
require
units,
major
DD FORM 1391,
The housing
complex
all
of which were built
renovation
and repair
to
DEC 99
Previous
consists
of 28 quad units
in 1964 and 1965.
correct
deterioration
editions
are obsolete.
and 12 single
family
These 40 year old homes
resulting
from age and
Page No.
443
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTIONPROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
4.
PROJECT TITLE
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING
CATEGORYCODE
88742
DATE
generated)
ARNOLD AIR FORCE BASE, TENNESSEE
5.
2.
7.
PROJECT NUMBER
711-143
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
ANZY064001
heavy use.
They do not meet the needs of today'
home environment.
A GOQ was recently
established;
uni t does not exceed other
repairs
taking
place,
1,930
s families,
nor do they exhibit
a modern
the improvement
scheduled
for this
and will
be in accordance
with the
Housing Community Profile
findings.
Occupants of the townhouse units
have no covered
parking
available
to protect
their
vehicles
from the weather.
All
units
have aged roofs
exhibiting
noticeable
sagging between trusses.
Exterior
painted
brick
surfaces
are
scaling
and faded.
Units have carpet
installed
over buckling
parquet
flooring
installed
with asbestos-containing
mastic.
The current
self-help
structures
are old,
separated,
inadequate
and lack required
functions.
Common areas in poor condition
include
bus
stops,
open recreation
areas,
crosswalks
and pavement markings.
Additionally,
there is
no neighborhood
area lighting
and no recreation
shelters.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Air
Force
members and their
families
will
continue
to
live
in
inadequate
housing
that will
rapidly
deteriorate
and remain in a condition
of living
lower than that of the surrounding
community,
adversely
affecting
morale and potentially
productivity.
As the units
continue
to age, increasing
service
calls
will
yield
larger
deficiencies.
Continuing
to maintain
these energy inefficient
units
will
continue
to
drain
limi ted funds.
WORK ACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS:
units;
maintenance
painting
7 units;
40 units;
pest control
40 units.
Mold
remediation
caps
40
ADDITIONAL:
The construction
agent is the Army Corps of Engineers,
resulting
costs of 5.7%.
The cost to improve the units
is 28% of the replacement
cost.
Civil
Engineer:
Lt Col Michael
Blaylock,
(931) 454-4320.
in SIOH
Base
DEC 99
Previous
equipment;
gutter
porches
DD FORM 1391,
playground
40 units;
screened-in
WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT THREE YEARS:
upgrade
None
editions
are obsolete.
.,"
Page No.
b
444
1'.llra
1.
C~NENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
PROGRAME~
6.
4.
CATEGORY CODE
88742
PROJECT TITLE
PRIVATIZE
7.
FAMILY HOUSING
PROJECT NUMBER
711-
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
GBLN064000
39,936
UNIT
ITEM
U M
COST
UANTITY
PRIMARYFACILITIES
PRI~TIZE
DATE
generated)
FRANCIS E WARRENAIR FORCE BASE, WYOMING
5.
2.
39,936
FAMILY HOUSING
UN
676
59,077
( 39,936 )
SUPPORTINGFACILITIES
0
SUBTOTAL
39,936
TOTAL CONTRACT
COST
39,936
TOTAL REQUEST
39,936
AREA COST FACTOR
1
10.
Description
of Proposed Work:
Convey 676 existing
sing~e and mu~tip~ex
units
and
construct
110 deficit
units.
Combined with prior
approved 265 unit
privatization
project,
this wi~l produce
a privatization
end state
of 941 units
(inc~uding
1 GOQ) on
approximate~y
400 acres of ~eased ~ands.
Without privatization,
MILCON cost for this
work is $99.5M for an anticipated
~everage of 2.5:1
(by grouping
with other bases the
combined ~everage wi~l be greater
than 3.0:1).
Privatized
units
wi~~ provide
modern
interior
and exterior
conveniences
and meet current
space and f~oor p~an requirements.
11.
REQUIREMENT:
PROJECT:
Privatize
941UN
Mi~itary
ADEQUATE: 210UN
Family
Housing
(Current
SUBSTANDARD: 621UN
Mission)
REQUIREMENT: This project
is required
to provide
modern and efficient
housing
for
mi~itary
members and their
dependents
stationed
at F. E. Warren AFB.
621 units
will
be
upgraded
or replaced
to meet current
~ife safety
codes and to provide
a comfortab~e
and
appealing
living
environment
comparable
to the off-base
civilian
community.
Additional~y,
110 new units
will
be constructed
to reduce projected
deficits.
A11 units
will
meet who1e house standards
and are programmed in accordance
with the Housing
Community Profile.
Renovated hous~ng w~ll provide
a modern kitchen,
living
room, family
room, bedroom and bath configuration,
with ample interior
and exterior
storage.
As
needed,
1iving
units
wi11 be expanded to meet current
space authorizations.
Sing1e or
double car garages and off street
parking
will
be provided
where deficient.
Neighborhood
improvements
are required
and will
include
upgraded utility
infrastructure,
landscaping,
playgrounds,
and recreation
areas.
CURRENT SITUATION:
This project
upgrades and modernizes
housing
that was constructed
between 1885 and 1987.
The majority
of these houses require
major renovation
and repair
to correct
deterioration
resulting
from age and heavy use.
They have had few upgrades
since construction,
and most do not meet the needs of today' s fami~~es,
nor do they
provide
a modern home environment.
In many of these units,
kitchen
and bathroom
cabinets
and fixtures
are obso1ete and deteriorated.
Counter tops are warped,
stained,
and separating
at the seams.
Plumbing and lighting
fixtures
are deteriorated
and dated.
The e1ectrical
systems do meet modern construction
codes.
Ground Fau~ t Circuit
Interrupter
protection
is not provided
for bathrooms,
kitchens,
and exterior
circuits.
F~ooring
is stained,
~oose, and mismatched due to the non-avai1abi1ity
of origina1
materials
for rep~acement.
Windows, siding,
and insulation
require
replacement.
The
units
have inadequate
~iving
space and storage,
and no patio
or backyard privacy.
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 99
Previous
editions
are obso~ete.
Page No.
445
-
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
4.
CATEGORYCODE
88742
Landscaping
renovation.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
areas
Units
7.
FAMILY HOUSING
PROJECT NUMBER
8.
GBLN064000
for
wi11
PROJECT TITLE
PRIVATIZE
711-111
and recreation
DATE
generated)
FRANCIS E WARRENAIR FORCE BASE, WYOMING
5.
2.
housing
residents
continue
to
39.936
are deficient.
deteriorate
PROJECT COST ($000)
rapidly,
Paved
areas
resu1ting
need
in
increasing
operations,
maintenance
and repair
costs to the Government and inconvenience
to residents.
Without
this project.
repair
of these units
wi11 continue
in a cost1y,
piecemea1
fashion
with 1itt1e
or no improvement
in 1iving
qua1ity.
Housing Requirement
and Market Ana1ysis
shows an on-base housing
deficit
of 110 units.
WORKACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS:
WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT THREE YEARS:
None
None
ADDITIONAL:
The scope of this privatization
project
has been reviewed
by the
insta11ation
commander.
This project
contains
no resa1e merchandise.
services
or
commercia1
recreation
operations
or activities
IAW with the SAF/MI Housing Privatization
Interim
Operating
Instructions
memo dated 2 March 1999 and AF/IL memo regarding
coordination
with AAFES, DeCA, and MWRBoard dated 19 March 1999.
A viab1e proforma
and
a pre1iminary
economic ana1ysis wi11 be deve1oped and provided
during
the concept
approva1 process,
and a certified
economic ana1ysis
wi11 be accomp1ished
prior
to
comp1etion
of the so1icitation
process.
In the event Congress does not extend the
privatization
1egislation
or the privatization
is financia11y
infeasible.
the Air Force
will
execute
an improvement
project
for 103 units
at the programmed amount requested
by
this
project
IAW the installation's
Housing Community Profile.
This project
will
be
accomplished
in conjunction
with FY04 privatization
project
GBLN 04-4000,
which has
already
received
congressional
authorization/approval.
GBLN 04-4000 authorized
the
privatization
of 265 Carlin
Heights
units
with a total
programmed amount of $5.391M.
The 1ocal
school authority
indicates
a capability
exists
to accept the increased
student
population
773-3600.
~~":;
generated
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 99
by this
project.
Previous
Base Civil
editions
are obsolete.
~,":'~):!
/"
~
~,
c
'.
Engineer:
.,.
Lt Col
Steven Ditmer,
Page No.
(307)
~~t)
1.
COMPONENT
AIR
FY 2006
FORCE
3.
RAMSTEIN
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
INSTALLATION
5.
MILITARY
AIR
4.
GEFMAN"i
PROGRAM ELEMENT
6.
PROJECT
IMPROVE
CATEGORY CODE
88742
DATA
2.
DATE
generated)
AND LOCATION
BASE,
PROJECT
7.
TITLE
FAMILY
PROJECT NUMBER
711-
HOUSING,
8.
PH C
PROJECT
TYFR064009
COST
4,519
UNIT
ITEM
U M
($000)
COST
UANTITY
PRIMARY FACILITIES
IMPROVE F~LY
3,668
HOUSING
UN
16 1
229,267
( 3,668
SUPPORTINGFACILITIES
SITE PREPARATION
LS
UTILITIES
LS
( 139)
LANDSCAPING
LS
(
119)
LS
(
164)
ROADS, PAVING'
SIDEWALKS
( 68)
SUBTOTAL
4,158
CONTINGENCY
( 5 %)
208
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION,
4,366
INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD
(3.5
%)
153
TOTAL REQUEST
4,519
AREA COST FACTOR
1.22
MOST EXPENSIVE UNIT
470,909
10.
Description
of Proposed Work:
Provides
general
interior
modernization
and
renovation
of 16 housing units.
Includes
utility
upgrades and additions
to meet
standards.
upgrade
provides
recreation
11.
increased
areas.
REQUIREMENT:
PROJECT:
Improve
bedroom,
kitchens,
Family
upgraded
to
current
phases
previous
phases,
meet
Community
house"
and
living
room,
exterior
Single
storage.
car garages
recreation
life
448
family
required
dependents
comparable
"whole
Neighborhood
is
to upgrade
Profile
C).
SUBSTANDARD:
This
2 E-9
current
plans,
playgrounds
and
paint removal.
2,214UN
(Phase
8 CGO four-bedroom,
their
and
Housing
floor
project
includes
four-bedroom,
472UN
3 GOQ four-
and
2 E-9
three-
Misssion)
project
and
environment
improves
ADEQUATE:
members
multiple
coverings,
2,686UN
military
meet
floor
privacy
fencing,
patios,
and asbestos/lead-based
Military
This
and
energy efficiency,
Includes
demolition
(Current
REQUIREMENT:
will
bathrooms,
1 SOQ four-bedroom,
bedroom units.
living
)
490
to
Ramstein
safety
codes
and
to
off-base
the
472 units.
remaining
be
standards
and
are
GOQ Master
Plan.
bedroom
modern
AB,
to
and
provide
efficient
housing
The
housing
a comfortable
community.
in
programmed
Renovated
in
subsequent
configuration,
with
will
provide
with
ample
be
appealing
phase
C of
are approved
phases.
accordance
housing
is
or
for
must
and
This
have been upgraded
accomplished
bath
and
Germany.
civilian
2214 units
to
room,
provide
at
All
the
in
units
Housing
a modern
interior
kitchen,
and
Living
units
will
be expanded to meet current
space authorizations.
and off street
parking
will
be provided
where deficient.
improvements
are
required
and
will
include
landscaping,
playgrounds
and
areas.
CURRENT SITUATION:
the 1950s.
DD FORM 1391,
These
This
project
50-year-old
DEC 99
upgrades
houses
Previous
and
require
editions
modernizes
major
housing
renovation
are obsolete.
that
was
and repair
constructed
to
in
correct
Page No.
~~47
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTIONPROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
88742
DATE
generated)
4.
RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, GERMANY
5.
2.
PROJECT TITLE
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING, PH C
CATEGORYCODE
7.
PROJECT NUMBER
711-161
8.
TYFR064009
PROJECT COST ($000)
4,519
deter~orat~on
result~ng
from age and heavy use.
They have had no major upgrades
s~nce
construct~on,
and do not meet the needs of today's
famil~es,
nor do they prov~de
a
modern home improvement.
Kitchen
and bathroom cab~nets
and f~xtures
are obsolete
and
deter~orated.
Counter tops are warped,
sta~ned,
and separat~ng
at the seams.
Plumb~ng
and l~ght~ng
f~xtures
are deter~orated
and dated.
The electr~cal
systems do not meet
modern construct~on
codes.
Ground Fault
C~rcu~t Interrupter
protect~on
~s not prov~ded
for bathrooms,
k~tchens,
and exter~or
c~rcu~ts.
Floor~ng
~s sta~ned,
loose,
and
mismatched
due to the non-ava~lab~l~ty
of or~g~nal
mater~als
for replacement.
W~ndows,
s~ding,
and ~nsulat~on
requ~re replacement.
The un~ts have ~nadequate
l~v~ng space and
storage,
and no pat~o or backyard pr~vacy.
Landscap~ng and recreat~on
areas for hous~ng
res~dents
are def~c~ent.
Paved ares need renovation.
IMPACT IF
NOT PROVIDED:
~ncreas~ng
residents.
p~ecemeal
operations,
maintenance
and repair
to the Government and ~nconven~ence
W~thout this project,
repa~r of these un~ts w~ll
continue
~n a costly
fashion
w~th l~ttle
or no improvement
~n l~v~ng qual~ty.
Un~ts
w~ll
cont~nue
WORK ACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS:
WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT THREE YEARS:
to deter~orate
rap~dly,
result~ng
~n
to
None
None
ADDITIONAL:
An economic analys~s
has been prepared
compar~ng the alternatives
of new
construct~on,
improvement,
and status
quo operation.
Based on the net present
values
and benef~ts
of the respect~ve
alternat~ves,
improvement
was found to be the most cost
effect~ve
over the life
of the project.
The cost to improve
the un~ts ~s 65% of the
replacement
cost.
SIOH ~s 3.5% based on agreement between US Air Force and German
execution
agent
(LEB).
Th~s project
meets the criteria
of the Air Force Hous~ng Guide
for Plann~ng,
Programming,
Design,
and Construction.
Base C~v~l Engineer:
Col Carlos
R. Cruz-Gonzales,
314 480-6228
FOREIGN CURRENCY:
DD FORM 1391,
,
,,\
~t~,
.
~?{j".,..;
FCF Budget
DEC 99
Rate Used:
Previous
EURO-DOLLAR .8785
editions
are obsolete.
Page No.
448
1.
COMPONENT
AIR
FY 2006
3.
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
INSTALLATION
KADENA AIR
5.
MILITARY
FORCE
AND LOCATION
BASE,
4.
JAPAN
PROGRAM ELEMENT
PROJECT
PROJECT
~ROVE
6.
CATEGORY CODE
88742
DATA
2.
7.
PROJECT
711-171
TITLE
FAMILY
NUMBER
HOUSING,
8.
PH 6
PROJECT
LXEZ064152
Q
DATE
generated)
COST
($000)
107,469
~n~rr
UNIT
ITEM
COST
U 1M nUANTITY
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING, PH 6
83,076
GOQ
UN
NON-GOQ
UN
41
300,750
566
( 1,203
144,652
( 81,873
SUPPORTINGFACILITIES
SITE
)
16,294
IMPROVEMENT/PERIMETER FENCE
LS
(
3,551)
LANDSCAPING
LS
(
1,588)
UTILITY
LS
(
5,196)
~NS
PARKING/STREET/SIDEWALK/PATH
LS
(
1,883)
PLAYGROUNDS/RECREATION
LS
(
2,836)
ENVIRONMENTAL -REMOVAL/DISPOSAL
LS
(
1,240)
SUBTOTAL
.
99,370
CONTINGENCY
(5%)
4,969
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION,
104 ,339
INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD
(3%)
3,130
TOTAL REQUEST
.107,469
AREA COST FACTOR
1 .52
MOST EXPENSIVE UNIT
10.
Description
and renovation
current
)
of
standards.
326,000
of Proposed Work:
570 housing units.
Upgrades
Provides
Includes
kitchens,
general
utility
bedrooms,
interior
and exterior
modernization
upgrades
and additions
to meet
bathrooms
and
finishes;
improves
floor
plans,
provides
energy efficiency,
fencing,
patios,
playgrounds
and recreation
areas.
Includes
demolition
and all
environmental
removal/disposal
work.
Provides
covered
garage
.back
(GOQ).
up.
Provides
Convert
BR units
to
Improve
This
members
and
upgraded
to
current
meet
environment
Renovated
family
project
military
house "
i
military
housing
tower
including
two-bedroom
emergency
units.
multiple
standards
bath
configuration,
will
be
are
will
(in
required
safety
to
the
power
Converts
two GOQ 3
DEC 99
and
to
provide
interior
and
to
meet
editions
with
living
exterior
current
are
work
(Current
efficient
Japan.
The
community.
A1.l units
the
Housing
room,
storage
standards.
obsolete.
and
housing
for
housing
must
and
This
is
meet
room,
Covered
.
be
appealing
will
patio.
4 GOQ
SNCO
Mission)
Community
family
UN
for
292
a comfortable
units.
accordance
includes
units
and
US civilian
kitchen,
types)
phase
5,347
3 E9 four-bedroom,
Okinawa,
inadequate
a modern
Previous
c
This
modern
in
off-base
in
SUBSTANDARD:
JNCO two-bedroom
provide
codes
programmed
some unit
140
to
all
ample
6).
stationed
to upgrade
provide
with
expanded
DD FORM 1391,
comparable
(Phase
and
dependents
life
phases
and
housing
is
their
2 , 833 UN
56 CGO three-bedroom,
72 JNCO three-bedroom
REQUIREMENT:
of
the
into
ADEQUATE:
3 SOQ four-bedroom,
three-bedroom,
living
in
units
8 , 442 UN
four-bedroom,
phase
improvements
4 BR units.
11 .REQUIREMENT:
PROJECT:
handicap
52 JNCO three-bedroom
the
sixth
"whole
Profile.
bedroom
Dwelling
garage
Page
and
units
will
No.
be
449
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
88742
DATE
generated)
4.
KADENA AIR BASE, JAPAN
5.
2.
PROJECT TITLE
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING, PH 6
CATEGORYCODE
7.
PROJECT NUMBER
711-171
8.
LXEZ064152
PROJECT COST ($000)
107,469
provided
for GOQ units,
off-street
parking,
neighborhood
improvements
are required
and
will
include
landscaping,
playgrounds
and recreation
facilities.
Conversion
of threebedroom into
two-bedroom units will
resolve
deficits
in the two-bedroom
unit type.
Provide
infrastructure
upgrade.
CURRENT SITUATION:
This project
upgrades
and modernizes
housing
that was built
by the
Government of Japan (GOJ) during
the 1960s and 1980s. These houses require
major
renovation
and repair
to correct
system deterioration,
meet modern standards,
and
provide
major home improvements.
They have had no major upgrades
since construction.
Kitchen
and bathroom cabinets
and fixtures
are obsolete
and deteriorated.
Counter
tops
are stained
and scratched.
Plumbing
and lighting
fixtures
are deteriorated
and
antiquated.
covering
is
The electrical
systems do not meet modern
stained,
mismatched due to non-availability
standards
and codes.
of similar
materials
Floor
for
replacement.
Exterior
surfaces
and roof including
windows,
doors and frames require
replacement.
These units
have inadequate
space for storage
and patio.
Landscaping
and
recreation
areas dedicated
for housing
residents
are deficient.
Utilities
systems are
deficient
and old.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Units
will
continue
to
deteriorate
rapidly,
resulting
in
increasing
operations,
maintenance
and repair
to the
government
and inconvenience
to
residents.
Without
this project,
repair
of these units will
continue
in a costly,
piecemeal
fashion
with little
or no improvement
in living
quality.
Housing Requirements
and Market Analysis
shows an on-base housing
deficit
of 262 units.
WORKACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS:
WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT THREE YEARS:
ADDITIONAL:
An economic
analysis
None
None
has been prepared
comparing
the
al terna ti ves
of
reconstruction,
improvement,
direct
compensation
and status
quo operation.
Based on the
net present
values
and benefits
of the respective
alternatives,
improvement
was found to
be most cost effective
over the life
of the project.
This project
is not eligible
for
Host Nation funding.
The cost to improve the units
is 32% of the replacement
cost.
Base
Civil
Engineer:
Colonel
Steven K. Lillemon,
011-81-611-734-1807.
FOREIGN CURRENCY:
DD FORM 1391,
FCF Budget
DEC 99
Rate Used:
Previous
YEN 115
editions
are obsolete.
Page No.
450
---
1.
AIR
3.
COMPONENT
FORCE
CONSTRUCTIONPROJECT DATA
(computer
AIR
BASE,
4.
JAPAN
PROGRAM E~
6.
CATEGORY CODE
7.
FAloaLY
PROJECT NUMBER
711-181
HOUSING,
8.
PH.
PROJECT
QKKA064025
Q
DATE
PROJECT TITLE
IMPROVE
88742
2.
generated)
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
MISAWA
5.
FY 2006 MILITARY
1
COST
($000)
58.046
~n~'r
UNIT
ITEM
COST
U 1M OUANTITY
PRIMARYFACILITIES
44,269
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING
UN
I
281
157,540
I
( 44,269
SUPPORTINGFACILITIES
SITE
)
9,403
IMPROVEMENT
LS
(
1,654)
LANDSCAPING
LS
UTILITIES
LS
(
561)
PAVEMENT/CURBS/GUTTERS
LS
(
1,416)
PARKING/COVERED PARKING
LS
(
2,100)
PLAYGROUND/RECREATIONAL
LS
(
1,006)
( 2,666)
SUBTOTAL
53,672
CONTINGENCY
(5%)
2,684
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION,
56,355
INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD
(3 %)
1,691
TOTAL REQUEST
58,046
AREA COST FACTOR
1. 68
MOST EXPENSIVE UNIT
287,000
10.
Description
of Proposed Work:
Provides
general
interior
and exterior
modernization
and renovation
of 281 housing units.
Includes
utility
upgrades,
additions
to meet
current
standards,
force protection
measures,
site improvement,
covered parking
for HStyle units,
storage
sheds, parking
for residents/guests,
playground
and landscaping.
Provides
pitched
roof,
covered court
and mud rooms.
Replaces
floor
heaters
with forced
air
ceiling
mounted
ki tchens,
heaters
bathrooms,
and
insulation
for Tower
for 1st and 2nd floor.
and recreation
areas.
11.
REQUIREMENT:
PROJECT:
REQUIREMENT:
military
This
Housing
upgraded
living
units
This
will
meet
Housing
Community
bedroom
and
DD FORM 1391,
bath
Phase
is
their
is
1.
required
dependents
the
whole
Plan.
first
This
plans,
upgrade
and
install
sound
and handicap
accessibility
privacy
fencing,
patios
1,115UN
phase
house
to
SUBSTANDARD:
includes
work
for
1,122UN
5 SOQ four-
64 JNCO three-bedroom,
provide
stationed
standards
Previous
ample
are
will
editions
efficient
Air
Base,
to provide
US civilian
to upgrade
programmed
provide
interior
and
Misawa
phases
and
housing
with
modern
at
safety
codes
and
to the off-base
of multiple
Renovated
configuration,
DEC 99
controller.
floor
and
and
in
housing
Japan.
JNCO
a comfortable
community
all
accordance
are obsolete.
storage
"..
housing
in
inadequate
a modern kitchen,
exterior
for
The
with
living
space.
and
the
-,~.
.
"
units.
the
room,
Living
Page No.
c
i,"
140
~ssion)
to meet current
life
environment
comparable
States.
temperature
68 JNCO four-bedroom,
project
and
and
improves
ADEQUATE:
(Current
members
must be
appealing
~l
Family
units
fan
(1937) to include
replacing
window rails
Provides
increased
energy efficiency,
Removes asbestos
and lead-based
paint.
4 CGO three-bedroom,
two-bedroom
United
include
coverings,
2,380UN
Improve
bedroom,
to
floor
.,
451
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTIONPROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
4.
PROJECT TITLE
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING, PH. 1
CATEGORYCODE
88742
7.
PROJECT NUMBER
711-181
units
will
be expanded
provided
where deficient.
landscaping,
playground
DATE
generated)
MISAW1\.AIR BASE, JAPAN
5.
2.
to
meet current
Neighborhood
and recreation
QKKA064025
space authorizations.
improvements
are
areas.
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
58,046
Off-street
parking
will
required
and will
include
be
CURRENT SITUATION:
This project
upgrades
and modernizes
housing
that was constructed
in
1982 thru 1987.
These houses require
major renovation
and repair
to correct
deterioration
resulting
from age and heavy use.
They have had no major upgrades
since
construction,
and do not meet the needs of today's
families,
nor do they provide
a
modern home environment.
Kitchen
and bathroom cabinets
and fixtures
are obsolete
and
deteriorated.
Counter
tops are warped,
stained,
and separating
at the seams.
Plumbing
and lighting
fixtures
are obsolete
and deteriorated
and outdated.
The electrical
systems do not meet modern construction
codes.
Ground Fault
Circuit
Interrupter
protection
is not provided
for bathrooms,
kitchens,
and exterior
circuits.
Flooring
is
stained,
loose,
and mismatched
due to the non-availability
of original
materials
for
replacement.
Windows, siding,
and insulation
require
replacement.
The washers and
dryers
in the Tower are located
in the kitchen,
which is open to the living
and dining
areas.
This creates
a lot of noise in these areas since the appliances
are not enclosed
and have no sound barrier.
The kitchen
is also exposed to lint
particles
from the dryer
unit.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Units will
continue
to deteriorate
rapidly,
resulting
in
increasing
operations,
maintenance
and repair
to the Government and inconvenience
to
residents.
Without
this project,
repair
of these units
will
continue
in a costly,
piecemeal
fash~on with little
or no improvement
in living
quality.
Housing Requirements
and Market Analysis
shows an on-base housing deficit
of 143 units.
WORKACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS:
WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT THREE YEARS:
None
None
ADDITIONAL:
An economic analysis
has been prepared
comparing
the alternatives
of new
construction,
improvement,
and status
quo operation.
Based on the net present
values
and benefits
of the respective
alternatives,
improvement
was found to be the most cost
Th;~ ~ P--J--rn;c~T
;~
nnT
c';~;h'o
~~U~ s ~~. Na~'
effective
ov er the l ;~ fe of the pro ;Ject
,
~~..c
funding.
The cost to improve the units
is 30% of the replacement
cost.
Base Civil
Engineer:
Lt Col David Maharrey,
011-81-3117-66-3089.
-
FOREIGN CURRENCY:
DD FORM 1391,
FCF Budget
DEC 99
Rate Used:
Previous
YEN 115
editions
are obsoJ.ete.
Page No.
452
1.
AIR
3.
COMPONENT
FY 2006
FORCE
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
INSTALLATION
YOKOTA AIR
5.
MILITARY
4.
JAPAN
PROGRAM ELEMENT
PROJECT
~ROVE
6.
CATEGORY CODE
BB742
DATA
2.
DATE
generated)
AND LOCATION
BASE,
PROJECT
7.
PROJECT
711
TITLE
MFH
NUMBER
(PHASE
B.
4)
PROJECT
ZNREO64301
COST
54,913
UNIT
ITEM
($000)
COST
UANTI TY
PRIMARYFACILITIES
43,666
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING
UN
IMPROVE GENERAL OFFICER QUARTER 694
UN
191
227,324
1
I
( 43,419
247,000
SUPPORTINGFACILITIES
7,109
MECHANICAL
LS
UTILITY
LS
(
2,228)
DEMOLITION
LS
(
1,223)
ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
LS
(
1,986)
RECREATION FACILITIES
LS
(
1,672)
(
SUBTOTAL
0)
50,775
CONTINGENCY
(5%)
2,539
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
53,314
SUPERVISION, INSPECTIONAND OVERHEAD
(3%)
1,599
TOTAL REQUEST
54,913
AREA COST FACTOR
1 .64
MOST EXPENSIVE UNIT
10.
Description
and renovation
Includes
)
( 247)
of
utility
240,000
of Proposed Work:
192 housing units
upgrades
and
Provides
including
additions
to
general
interior
and exterior
modernization
one general
officer's
quarters
(GOQ).
meet
current
standards.
upgrades
kitchens,
bathrooms,
reconfigures
floor
layout,
and increases
energy efficiency.
Provides
patios,
playgrounds,
recreation
areas and utilities
replacement.
Includes
demolition
and
asbestos/lead-based
paint removal.
11.
REQUIREMENT:
PROJECT:
2,51BON
Improve
bedroom,
Family
units
REQUIREMENT:
This
military
members
to meet
current
environment
multiple
project
and
life
standards
and
will
configuration
GOQ will
with
be
early
DD FORM 1391,
1970s.
DEC 99
This
codes
This
to
provide
and
according
project
91BON
on 1 GOQ fourand
70
JNCO
be
upgraded
with
units
Previous
the
room,
the
units
Housing
family
storage.
and
modernizes
editions
major
must
and appealing
This
will
is
the
meet whole
Community
Plan.
for
living
fourth
of
house
Renovated
room,
bedroom
and
bath
Units
will
air
conditioned.
was
constructed
AF GOQ Master
require
housing
Housing
community.
All
exterior
to
upgrades
These housing
work
efficient
AB.
a comfortable
units.
living
and
Yokota
US civilian
accordance
kitchen,
interior
includes
FGO three-bedroom,
modern
at
and to provide
inadequate
in
phase
116
stationed
off-base
all
modern
ample
required
the
programmed
CURRENT SITUATION:
the
to
modernized
4).
SUBSTANDARD:
.
dependents
to upgrade
are
~ssion)
is
their
safety
provide
(Phase
l,600ON
4 FGO four-bedroom,
(Current
comparable
phases
housing
in
Housing
1 SOQ four-bedroom,
three-bedroom
The
ADEQUATE:
be
Plan.
housing
renovation
are obsolete.
which
and repair
to
correct
Page No.
453
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTIONPROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.
YOKOTA AIR BASE, JAPAN
5.
PROGRAMELEMENT
88742
6.
2.
DATE
generated)
PROJECT TITLE
IMPROVE MFH (PHASE 4 )
CATEGORY CODE
7.
PROJECT NUMBER
711-171
8.
ZNRE064301
PROJECT COST ($000)
54,913
deterioration
resu~ting
from age and heavy use.
They have had no major upgrades
since
construction,
and do not meet the needs of today's
families,
nor do they provide
a
modern home environment.
Kitchens
do not provide
adequate storage,
cabinet
space or
countertop
area, and are not functiona~~y
arranged.
P~umbing and ~ighting
fixtures
are
deteriorated.
The electrica~
systems do not meet modern construction
codes.
Ground
fau~t circuit
interrupter
protection
is not provided
for bathrooms,
kitchens,
and
exterior
circuits.
Flooring,
windows,
and roofing
require
replacement.
The units
have
inadequate
~iving
space and storage.
P~aygrounds,
parking
inadequate
or nonexistent.
The GOQ is deficient
and major
repairs
are identified
in the AF GOQ Master Plan.
areas,
items
and ~andscaping
of improvements
are
and
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Units wil~ continue
to deteriorate
rapidly
resu~ting
in
increasing
operations,
maintenance
and repair
costs to the Government and inconvenience
to the residents.
Without
this project
repair
of these units
wi~l be accomp~ished
in a
costly
and piecemeal
fashion
with ~itt~e
or no improvement
in ~iving
quality.
Housing
Requirements
and Market Ana~ysis
shows an on-base surplus
of 193 units.
WORKACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS:
WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT THREE YEARS:
None
None
ADDITIONAL:
An economic ana~ysis
has been prepared
comparing
the a~ternatives
for new
construction,
improvement,
and status
quo operation.
Based on the net present
values
and benefits
of the respective
alternatives,
improvement
was found to be the most cost
effective
over the ~ife
of the project.
The cost to improve this
housing
is 11% of the
replacement
cost.
This project
is not eligible
for Host Nation funding.
Base Civi~
Engineer:
Lt Co~ Martin
Granum (011-81-3117-55-7215)
DSN 315 225-7215.
FOREIGN CURRENCY: FCF Budget
Rate Used:
DD FORM 1391,
Previous
DEC 99
YEN 115
editions
are obso~ete.
Page No.
~!)4I
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
4.
PORTUGAL
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
2.
DATE
generated)
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
LAJES FIELD,
5.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
PROJECT TITLE
WHOLE HOUSE IMPROVEMENTS, BIERA ~
CATEGORYCODE
88742
7.
711-
PROJECT NUMBER
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
MQNA023006
16,183
UNIT
ITEM
U M
COST
UANTITY
PRIMARYFACILITIES
MILITARY
~ILY
12,980
HOUSING
SM
150
86,531
I
( 12,980
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SITE
)
1,492
DEVELOPMENT
LS
(
36)
SITE UTILITIES
LS
( 128)
SITE
LS
(
950)
LS
(
378)
IMPROVEMENTS
PAVEMENTS
SUBTOTAL
14,472
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
SUPERVISION,
TOTAL
AREA
(5%)
CONTRACT
724
COST
15,196
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD
(6.5
%)
988
REQUEST
COST
16,183
FACTOR
MOST EXPENSIVE
1 .4
UNIT
98,050
10.
Description
of Proposed Work:
Provides
general
interior
and exterior
renovation
150 housing units.
Includes
utility
upgrade and additions
to meet current
housing
standards.
uPgrades
kitchens,
bathrooms,
bedrooms and floor
coverings,
improves
floor
plans,
and provides
increased
energy efficiency,
privacy
fencing,
patios,
playgrounds,
and recreation
areas.
11.
REQUIREMENT:
PROJECT:
Mission).
451UN
ADEQUATE: 301UN
of
SUBSTANDARD: 150UN
Improve
military
family
housing at Lajes Field,
Azores,
Portugal
(Current
Grade Mix:
30 -JNCO/4BR,
20 -JNCO/3BR,
and 100 -JNCO/2BR units.
REQUIREMENT: This project
is required
to provide
modern and efficient
housing
for
mili tary members and their
dependants
stationed
at Lajes Field,
Azores,
Portugal.
The
housing
must be upgraded to meet current
life-safety
codes and to provide
a comfortable
and appealing
living
environment
comparable
to the off-base
civilian
community.
~l
units
will
meet "whole house" standards
and are programmed in accordance
with the
February
1999 Lajes Field
Housing Community Plan and the 2004 Lajes Field
Family Housing
Master Plan.
Renovated housing will
provide
modern kitchen,
living
room, family
room,
bedroom and bath configuration,
with ample interior
and exterior
storage.
Living
units
will
be expanded as necessary
to meet current
space authorizations.
Mechanical
and
electrical
systems will
be upgraded to meet current
standards
and provide
adequate
capacity
and quality
to support
the lifestyles
of todays families.
Neighborhood
improvements
are required
and include
landscaping,
playgrounds,
recreation
areas,
and
jogging
paths.
Windows and doors will
be replaced
as necessary
to meet current
Antiterrosism/Force
Protection
standards.
Parking will
be provided
where deficient.
CURRENT SITUATION:
and 1989.
Current
DD FORM 1391,
This project
upgrades and modernizes
housing
that
houses are inadequate
and require
major renovation
DEC 99
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
was built
in
to meet new
Page No.
1984
455
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
(computer
4.
PORTUGAL
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
88742
2.
DATE
generated)
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
LAJES FIELD,
5.
CONSTRUCTIONPROJECT DATA
PROJECT TITLE
WHOLE HOUSE IMPROVEMENTS, BIERA MAR
CATEGORY CODE
7.
PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
MQNA023006
16,183
housing
size standards
and requirements.
They have had no major upgrades
since
construction
and do not meet the needs of today's
families,
nor do they provide
a modern
home environment.
Plumbing and lighting
fixtures
are deteriorated
and dated.
The
electrical
and mechanical
systems do not meet modern construction
codes.
Housing
interiors
are not functional,
storage
and counterspace
are inadequate,
cabinets
are old
and sinks are worn.
Roofs, walls,
sidewalks,
and pavements require
major repair
or
replacement
due to the effects
of Lajes'
environment.
Landscaping,
lighting,
parking,
and recreations
areas for housing
residents
are deficient.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Units will
continue
to deteriorate
resulting
in increasing
operations,
maintenance,
and repair
costs to the Air Force and inconvenience
to the
residents.
Without
this project,
repair
of these units
will
be done in a costly,
piecemeal
fashion
with little
or no improvement
in living
quality,
and cause continual
interruption
to the families
living
in the units.
Low morale and retention
problems
be expected
to exist
if conditions
are permitted
to continue.
WORKACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS:
Replaced
water
distribution,
can
FY03 and FY04.
Constructed
Biera Mar Interconnecting
Road, FY03.
Replaced fence and gates,
FY03 and
FY04.
Installed
Mylar,
300 units,
FY03.
Renovated kitchens
and bathrooms
(64 units,
not included
in this
scope),
FY03.
Installed
AFN Distribution
and Telephone
upgrade,
FY03.
Entry Ways and Patios,
170 units
FY03.
Landscaping,
FY03.
Replaced
Heat Pumps,
FY02, 300 units.
WORK PROGRAMMED
FOR NEXT THREE YEARS:
None
ADDITIONAL:
This project
meets the criteria
specified
in the Air Force Housing Guide
for Planning,
Programming,
Design and Construction.
An economic analysis
has been
prepared
comparing
the alternatives
of new construction,
improvement,
and status
quo
operation.
Based on the net present
values
and benefits
of the respective
alternatives,
improvement
was found to be the most cost effective
over the life
of the project.
The
cost to improve the units
is 53% of the replacement
cost.
This project
is not eligible
for NATO funding.
Also,
shipping
costs to the Azores have increased
significantly
and
are accounted
for in the FY06 program.
The construction
agent is NAVFAC, resulting
in
SIOH costs of 6.5%.
Base Civil
Engineer:
Lt Col Terry Watkins,
DSN 314 535-6113.
BASE CIVIL
ENGINEER:
FOREIGN CURRENCY:
DD FORM 1391,
Haynie
FCF Budget
DEC 99
Rate Used:
Previous
EURO-DOLLAR .8785
editions
are obsolete.
Page No.
456
C)"""'#I;'"
.'.'
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.
loK)RONAIR BASE, SPAIN
5.
PROGRAME~
6.
88742
"
2.
DATE
generated)
PROJECT TITLE
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING
CATEGORY CODE
7.
711-
PROJECT NOMBER
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
QUUG033002
7 ' 128
-;
\):,'~~
UNIT
ITEM
U M
COST
UANTITY
PRIMARY FACILITIES
IMPROVE
FAMILY
5,353
HOUSING
UN
34
157,431
(
SUPPORTINGFACILITIES
5,353
1,022
PAVDIENT
LS
(
512)
LANDSCAPING
LS
(
122)
UTILLITIES
LS
(
388)
SUBTOTAL
6,375
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
( 5 %)
CONTRACT
319
COST
6,693
SUPERVISION, INSPECTIONAND OVERHEAD
TOTAL
AREA
(6.5%)
435
REQUEST
COST
)
7,128
FACTOR
MOST EXPENSIVE
1 .28
UNIT
218,639
10.
Description
of Proposed Work:
Provides
general
interior
and exterior
modernization
and renovation
of 34 housing units.
Includes
utility
upgrades
and additions
to meet
current
standards.
upgrades kitchens,
bathrooms,
floor
coverings,
improves
floor
plans,
family
rooms, provides
increased
energy efficiency,
privacy
fencing,
patios,
parking
and
pavements.
Includes
asbestos/lead-based
paint removal.
11 .REQUIREMENT:
PROJECT:
JNCO (4),
36 UN
ADEQUATE: 2 UN
Improve Military
Family
4 SNCO (3), 9 JNCO (3),
Housing.
This work is
and 17 JNCO (2) units.
SUBSTANDARD: 34 UN
for 1 FGO (3), 1 CGO (3),
(Current Mission).
2
REQUIREMENT: This project
is required
to provide
modern and efficient
housing
for
military
members and their
dependents
stationed
at Moron AB.
The housing
must be
upgraded
to meet current
life
safety
codes and to provide
a comfortable
and appealing
living
environment.
All units
will
meet "whole house" standards
and are programmed in
accordance
with the Housing Community Plan.
Renovated housing
will
provide
a modern
kitchen,
living
room, family
room, bedrooms,
and bath configuration,
with ample interior
and exterior
storage.
Living
units
will
be expanded to meet current
space
authorizations.
Two car garages will
be provided.
Neighborhood
improvements
are
required
and will
include
landscaping,
roads and infrastructure
utility
replacement.
CURRENT SITUATION:
This project
upgrades/modernizes
housing
that was constructed
in
1957.
These 46-year-old
houses require
major renovation
to correct
deterioration
resulting
from age and use.
They have had no major upgrades
since original
construction,
and do not meet the needs of today's
families,
nor do they provide
a
modern home environment.
Kitchen
and bathroom cabinets
and fixtures
are obsolete
and
deteriorated.
Counter tops are warped, stained,
and separating
at the seams.
Plumbing
and lighting
fixtures
are deteriorated
and dated.
The electrical
systems do meet modern
construction
codes except ground fault
interrupter
protection
is not provided
for
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 99
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
Page No.
457
1.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
AIR FORCE
3.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION
AND LOCATION
4.
MORONAIR BASE, SPAIN
5.
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
88742
2.
DATE
generated)
PROJECT TITLE
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING
CATEGORYCODE
7.
PROJECT NUMBER
711-151
QUUGO33002
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
7,128
bathrooms,
kitchens,
and exterior
circuits.
Flooring
is stained
and loose.
Windows are
low grade aluminum and are difficult
to maintain
and clean.
The units
have inadequate
living
space and storage,
and no patio
or backyard privacy.
Landscaping
and recreation
areas for housing
residents
are deficient.
Paved areas need renovation.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Units will
continue
to deteriorate
rapidly,
resulting
in
increasing
operations,
maintenance
and repair
to the Government
and inconvenience
residents.
Without
this project,
repair
of these units
will
continue
in a costly,
piecemeal
fashion
with little
or no improvement
in living
quality.
WORKACC~LISHED
IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS:
WORK PROGRAMMEDFOR NEXT THREE YEARS:
to
None
None
.ADDITIONAL:
This project
meets the criteria
of the Air Force Housing Guide for
Planning,
Programming,
Design,
and Construction.
A preliminary
economic analysis
has
been prepared
comparing
the alternatives
of new construction,
improvement,
and status
quo operation.
Based on the net present
values
and benefits
of the respective
alternatives,
improvement
was found to be most cost effective
over the life
of the
project.
The cost to improve the units
is 67% of the replacement
cost.
This project
is
not eligible
for NATO funding.
The construction
agent is NAVFAC, resulting
in SIOH
costs of 6.5%.
BASE CIVIL ENGINEER: Mr. Britton
Clair,
DSN (314) 722-8314
FOREIGN CURRENCY:
FCF Budget
Rate Used:
EURO-DOLLAR .8785
.
,
..
~;
~,..;
~,
#.
~
\1:'
.
~c
"
,
or
~
"i
~'
DD FORM 1391,
",;3
DEC 99
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
Page No.
458
1.
COMPONENT
AIR
3.
MILITARY
FORCE
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
INSTALLATION
INCIRLIK
5.
FY 2006
AIR
PROGRAM ELEMENT
4.
TURKEY
6.
88742
PROJECT
IMPROVE
CATEGORY CODE
7.
2.
DATE
TITLE
MILITARY
PROJECT NUMBER
711-142
-9-
DATA
generated)
AND LOCATION
BASE ADANA,
PROJECT
FAMILY
8.
HOUSING
PROJECT
LJYC064003
COST
($000)
20,081
COST
UNIT
ITEM
COST
ULM ~UANTITY
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING (PHASE 1)
15,422
DWELLINGS
UN
235
65,624
1
( 15,422 )
2,536
SUPPORTINGFACILITIES
PAVEIoIENTS
LS
(
650)
UTILITIES
LS
(
200)
LANDSCAPING
LS
(
300)
RECREATION
LS
(
100)
COMMONNEIGHBORHOOD
LS
(
180)
COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT
LS
(
1,106)
SUBTOTAL
17,958
CONTINGENCY
(5%)
898
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION,
18,855
INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD
(6.5
%)
1,226
TOTAL REQUEST
20,081
AREA COST FACTOR
.9
I
MOST EXPENSIVE UNIT
10.
Description
and renovation,
137,387
of Proposed Work:
Provides
and conversion
of 235 units.
doors,
windows,
floor
improves
floor
plans,
pavements,
ll.
utility
units
MOST EXPENSIVE
Family
and
(Current
UNIT:
REQUIREMENT:
This
U.S.
units,
a comfortable
This is the
programmed
common
in
units
upgrade;
100
Housing
Master
of
SUBSTANDARD:
1).
This
79 JNCO four-bedroom,
phase
provides
850UN
5 SNCO four-
76 JNCO three-bedroom
and
were
these
to
provide
personnel
neighborhood,
and
modern
stationed
infrastructure
and
at
efficient
Incirlik
require
Air
70 JNCO
repair
housing
for
Base.
The
and
and appealing
living
environment
and to meet current
first
of multiple
phases to upgrade 750 houses.
This
with
The
Plan;
required
civilian
accordance
CURRENT SITUATION:
l50
OUN
(Phase
Mission).
is
Government
housing
Housing
areas.
$137,387
project
provide
codes.
and recreation
ADEQUATE:
Military
modernization
and bathrooms,
electrical,
HVAC and fire
protection
systems,
energy efficiency,
and upgrades patios,
playgrounds
5 SNCO three-bedroom,
two-bedroom
units;
finishes,
increased
850UN
Improve
bedroom,
airman
systems,
REQUIREMENT:
PROJECT:
and wall
provides
general
interior
and exterior
Includes
upgrade of kitchen
current
FY2004
constructed
150
750
units
units
Family
Military
in
are
were
Housing
Family
1961
and
proposed
constructed
Master
Housing
are
for
at
replacement
1983
thru
to
life
safety
project
is
Plan.
Incirlik
deteriorated
in
upgrade
consists
beyond
in
FY2006
1985
and
of
900
economical
per
need
FY2004
Family
improvements
to meet today's
housing requirements.
These houses had no major repair
and/or
upgrade
since construction.
Per FY2003 Housing Community Profile
and FY2004 Family Housing
DD FORM 139l,
DEC 99
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
Page No.
lI!)!I
I
1.
COMPONENT
AIR
3.
FY 2006 MILITARY
FORCE
(computer
4.
UNITED KINGDOM
PROGRAMELEMENT
6.
7.
711-181
-9-
DATE
PROJECT TITLE
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING
CATEGORY CODE
88742
2.
generated)
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
RAF MILDENHALL,
5.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
PROJECT NUMBER
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
QFQE064001
2,038
COST
UNIT
ITEM
COST
U-LM~UANTITY
PRIMARY FACILITIES
1,731
FAM HSG OTHER
UN
10
I
173,130
( 1,731 )
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
135
ROADS
LS
(
UTILITIES
LS
( 75)
CQIoIMUNITY
LS
(
SUBTOTAL
(5 %)
CONTRACT
SUPERVISION,
TOTAL
AREA
93
COST
1,960
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD
(4 %)
78
REQUEST
COST
30)
1,866
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
30)
2,038
FACTOR
MOST EXPENSIVE
1.2
UNIT
201,419
10.
Description
of Proposed Work:
Provides
general
interior
and exterior
modernization
of 10 housing
units;
upgrades kitchens,
bathrooms;
improvement
of floor
plans;
assessment
of and any subsequent
abatement of asbestos
and lead-based
paint.
Neighborhood
improvements
to landscaping
and utili
ties
and provision
of playground
and
recreation
area within
the Airmen Married
Quarters.
All work carried
out is to comply
with current
Base Standards,
Host Nation/USAF
and National
Fire Protection
Association
requirements.
11.
REQUIREMENT: 101 UN
ADEQUATE: 90 UN
PROJECT:
Improve Family Housing.
bedroom,
and 4 FGO three-bedroom
REQUIREMENT: This project
military
members and their
be upgraded
to meet current
appealing
will
meet
living
"whole
This project
includes
(Current
Mission) .
SUBSTANDARD: 11 UN
3 SOQ five-bedroom,
3 SOQ four-
is required
to provide
modern and efficient
housing
for
dependants
stationed
at RAF Mildenhall.
The housing
needs
contemporary
standards
and to provide
a comfortable
and
environment
comparable
to the off-base
house" standards
and are programmed in
civilian
community.
accordance
with the
to
All units
Housing
Community Profile.
Renovated housing will
provide
modern living
area, including
family
room, adequate
bedroom/bathroom
configuration,
ample interior
and exterior
storage.
Garages will
be expanded to meet current
authorizations.
Neighborhood
improvements
are
required
and will
include
landscaping,
playgrounds
and recreation
areas.
CURRENT SITUATION:
This project
upgrades and modernizes
housing
that was originally
constructed
in the 1930s.
These units
require
renovation
and repair
due to age and
heavy use.
They currently
do not fully
meet the needs of today's
families.
Existing
roofs
are approximately
70 years old and beyond their
expected
serviceable
life.
Smoke
and carbon monoxide detectors
are to be installed
in accordance
with current
AF
standards.
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 99
Previous
editions
are obsol.ete.
Page No.
461
1.
AIR
3.
COMPONENT
FY 2006 MILITARY
FORCE
CONSTRUCTIONPROJECT DATA
(computer
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.
RAE' MILDENHAr.L, UNITED KINGDOM
5.
PROGRAMELEMENT
1
6.
88742
CATEGORYCODE
Units
DATE
PROJECT TITLE
IMPROVE FAMILY HOUSING
7.
711-181
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
2.
generated)
PROJECT NUMBER
8.
PROJECT COST ($000)
QFQE064001
will
continue
to deteriorate,
2,038
resulting
in
increased
operations,
maintenance
and repair
costs to the Government and inconvenience
to the
residents.
Without
this project,
repair
of these units
will
continue
in a costly,
piecemeal
fashion
with no improvement
to living
standards.
Low morale and retention
problems
can be expected
if such conditions
remain.
Affordable
off-base
housing
is
limited.
WORK ACCOMPLISHED IN PREVIOUS THREE YEARS:
WORK PROGRAMMED
FOR NEXT THREE YEARS:
ADDITIONAL:
An economic
analysis
None
None
has been prepared
construction,
improvement
and status
quo operation.
benefits
of the respective
alternatives,
improvement
effective
over the life
of the project.
The project
comparing
the
alternatives
Family Housing Guide for Planning,
Programming,
Design and Construction.
The cost to improve the units
is 51% of the replacement
cost.
This project
eligible
for NATO funding.
Base Civil
Engineer,
011-44-1638-54-5630.
FOREIGN CURRENCY: FCF Budget
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 99
Rate Used:
Previous
of
new
Based on the net present
values
and
was found to be the most cost
meets the criteria
of the Air Force
is
not
POUND .593
editions
are obsolete.
Page No.
462
ADVANCE PLANNING
AND DESIGN
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
Mn..,ITARY FAMJLY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
FY 2006 ADVANCE PL~lliG
AND DESIGN
Program (In Thousands)
FY 2006 Program$40,404
FY 2005 Pro~
$38,266
Purpose and ScoQe
This programprovidesfor preliminarystudiesto developadditional family housingfacilities,
onetime multi-phasedesign,and housingcommunityprofile developments;studiesfor site
adaptationand determinationof type and designof units; andworking drawings,specifications,
estimates,projectplanningreportsand final designdrawingsof family housingconstruction
projects. This includesthe useof architecturaland engineeringservicesin connectionwith any
family housingnew or postacquisitionconstructionprogram.
Program Summ~
Authorizationis requestedfor:
(1) Advanceplanningand designfor future yearhousingprograms;
(2) FY 2006 Authorizationand Appropriationof $40,404,000to fund this effort as
outlined in the following exhibit:
February2005
PageNo.
463
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
FY 2006 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION
ANDLOCATION
VARIOUS AIR FORCEBASES
5. PROGRAM
ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY
CODE
88742/31196
PROJECT DATA
4. PROJECT
TITLE
FAMIL Y HOUSING ADVANCE PLANNING
AND DESIGN
7. PROJECT
NUMBER
8. PROJECT
COST($000)
711-000
40,404
9. COSTESTIMATE
ITEM
FAMIL Y HOUSING ADVANCE PLANNING
AND DESIGN
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
TOTAL REQUEST
U/M
QUANTITY
COST
UNITCOST
LS
($000)
40,404
40,404
40,404
40,404
10. DESCRIPTION
OFPROPOSED
CONSTRUCTION:
Architect-engineer services, survey, fees, etc., in connection
with advance planning and design of family housing dwelling units and properties included in or proposed
for the Air Force Family Housing Construction Account.
11. PROJECT: This request is for an authorization and appropriation of $40,404million to provide planning
and design costs in connection with family housing new or post acquisition construction programs.
REOUIREMENT: The funds requested are necessaryto procure architect-engineer services to make site and
utility investigations; one time multi-phase design, and housing community profiles (HCP) developments;
and for the preparation of design and specifications of advance plans for future year family housing
programs in connection with any family housing new or post acquisition construction programs.
IMP ACT IF NOT PROVIDED: The funds requested are necessary to support the development of the housing
community profiles and to support the new and post acquisition construction programs. Without the
requested funds, housing community profiles cannot be developed and the new and post acquisition
construction programs cannot be designed and constructed.
\
DD FORM1391,DEC76
PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
MAYBEUSEDINTERNALLY
UNTILEXHAUSTED
PAGENO
4 6 .,
:~~~
O&M
SUMMARY
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
OPERATIONS.UTILITIES AND MAINTENANCE
(Excluding Leasing, Debt, and Privatization)
Program ($ in Thousands)
FY 2006 Program $575,594
FY 2005 Program $705,734
Purpose and ScoI2e: Provides operations and maintenanceresourcesto pay for the cost of
ownership in terms of property management,utilities, and maintenance of Air Force owned
units. The Air Force family housing budget requestsessential resourcesto provide military
families with housing either in the private market through assistancefrom a housing referral
office, or in privatized or government housing. Increasedemphasishas beenplaced on the
proper funding of the family housing operations and maintenanceprogram. The Air Force's
FY2006 Operation and Maintenance programs emphasizethe following goals:
* Identify affordable housing for military members. Where shortagesexist, identify project
proposalsto privatize or requestnew construction or leasing of housing for military families.
* Reduce utility consumption through increased managementemphasis on energy
conservation, maintenenanceand repair projects to reduce energy consumption, and wholehouse improvements to improve energy efficiency.
* Provide government appliances and furniture in foreign countries where member-owned
units are inappropriate or non-existent and where new housing units which need governmentsupplied appliances are coming on line. Redistribute excessfurnishings from realigned bases.
* Invest wisely in maintenanceand repairs to preservethe existing adequatehousing
inventory worldwide. The top priorities are preservation of the good inventory that we have-keeping "good houses good"--and resolving problems that are a threat to life, safety, or health.
We continue to adhereto the SPG to eliminate inadequatehousing units, including neglected
infrastructure, and sustain our inadequateunits until they are privatized, receive a whole house
improvement, or are demolished or replaced.
* Schedule maintenanceand repair activities along with whole-house improvements to
obtain the greatesteconomies of scale and enhancementin livability while increasing the useful
life of housing units with the minimum capital investment and minimum impact on occupants.
* Support privatization of utilities through the housing or utilities privatization
program as appropriate.
a. OI2erations. This portion of the program provides for operating expensesin the
following sub-accounts:
February 2005
PageNo.
465
i
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
(1) Management. Includes installation-level managementsuch as housing office
operations, quality assuranceevaluators, administrative support, and community liaison. It
supports the Air Force Family Housing Master Plan (FHMP) and General Officer Quarters
(GOQ) Master Plan efforts. It also supports the housing referral program, assisting the 60
percent of Air Force families living in local communities to find quarters in the private sector and
implementing the Fair Housing Act of 1968 and assists in placing members in privatized
housing. Housing Management offices provide counseling on housing decision-making and
advance information on new base of assignment. The managementeffort at installations
privatizing housing will gradually be reduced to an appropriate level for inherently governmental
tasks to include assetmanagement,housing relocation and referral services, and fiscal analysis.
During major construction phasesof privatized units, government oversight is required.
Manning levels will remain relatively stable until construction completion at which time they
should decreaseas a minimum 20 percent. For baseswith competitively sourced operations, the
Air Force must continue to provide oversight support and advise installation leadership.
(2) Services. Provides basic support services including refuse collection and
disposal; custodial services; fire and police protection; entomology and pest control; and snow
removal and street cleaning. Privatized units do not receive funding from this account.
(3) Furnishings. Procures household equipment (primarily stoves and
refrigerators) and, in limited circumstances (largely overseas),furniture. Controls inventories of
furnishings at the warehousesand maintains and repairs furniture and appliances. Becausethe
majority of the funds in this account (85%) are spentoverseas,privatization, which is limited to
CONUS and US overseaslocations, has little effect on this account.
(4) Miscellaneous. Provides mobile home hookups, leasedoffice and warehouse
space supporting family housing, payments to other Federal agencies or foreign governments to
operate housing units occupied by Air Force personnel, and similar costs. Also funds
Department of State surchargeswhere leasedhousing is procured through their services.
Privatization has no impact on these activities.
b. Utilities. Includes all purchased and base-producedheat, electricity, water, sewer, and gas
commodities serving family housing. Occupantspurchase their own telephone and cable TV
service. Where required, includes investment, operations and repair costs paid to nongovernment systemowners in the casewhere utilities have beenprivatized. Privatized housing
units do not receive funding from this account.
c. Maintenance. Privatized housing units do not receive funding from this account.
Provides upkeep of family housing real property, as follows:
February 2005
PageNo.
466
I
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
(1) Maintenance/Repair
of Dwellings. Includesservicecalls, routinemaintenance
andrepairs,and replacementof deterioratedfacility components.Housingmaintenance
contractsare includedin thesecosts.
(2) ExteriorUtilities. Maintenanceandrepairof water, sewer,electric,steamand
gaslines supportingfamily housingareas.Whererequired,includesinvestment,operations,and
repair costspaid to non-governmentsystemownersin casewhereutilities havebe privatized.
(3) OtherRealProperty. Upkeepof grounds,commonareas,roads,parking areas,
and otherpropertyfor the exclusiveuseof family housingoccupantsnot discussedabove.
(4) AlterationsandAdditions. Minor alterationsto housingunits or housingsupport
facilities. Largescopeandhigh dollar-valueprojectssuchaswhole-houseimprovementsare
included in the constructionprogram.
Operationand MaintenanceFY 2006Prog:ramSummary-Highlights
Authorization/Appropriationis requestedin FY 2006 for $575,594. This amount,togetherwith
estimatedreimbursements
of $11,782will fund the FY 2006 Operationand Maintenance
programof $587,376.
A summaryof the funding programfor FY 2006 is asfollows ($ in thousands):
Operations Utility
Maintenance Total Direct Reimburse- Total
Reguest Reguest
Reguest
Reguest
~
Program
$148,169 $116,946 $310,479
February2005
$575,594
$11,782
$587,376
PageNo.4
67
-
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
Operations and Maintenance Reprogramming
Fiscal Year 2004
Actions
($000)
FY 2004
Appropriation
Funds
Percent
FY 2004
Reprogrammed
Reprogrammed
End of Year
Utilities
132,651
31,319
23.61 %
163,970
Operations
Management
Services
70,083
26,070
3,212
5,291
4.58%
20.30%
73,295
31,361
43,006
2,527
3,085
-410
7.17%
-16.22%
46,091
2,117
Leasing
109,514
4,866
4.44%
114,380
Maintenance
394,631
-47,363
-12.00%
347,268
37
o
0.00%
37
44,536
o
0.00%
44,536
823,055
o
Furnishings
Miscellaneous
Interest
Privatization
Total
February2005
Support
823,055
PageNo.4
68
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
USAF
Family
FY2006
PB
Housing
Operation
and
Maintenance,
Summary
Excludes Leased Units and Costs
Worldwide
2006
Command:
USAF
Exhibit:
FH-2
Summary
FiscalYear:
Invent~
Data lUnits)
Units in Being Beginning of Year
Units in Being at End of Year
2004*
Average InventC?!:z:.-forYear
Historic Units
Units R~uiri~
O&M Funding:
a. Contiguous US
b. U. S. Overseas
c. Foreign
d. Worldwide
Funding
Fiscal Year:
R~uirements
($OOOi
2005*
94,954
84,942
84,942
47,640
47,640
42,489
89,948
66,291
45,065
1,053
1,036
209
62,222
5,444
22,282
89,9~
Total Cost
l$OOQl
2006*
Uni
Cost_($
39,723
4,286
22,282
66,291
Total Cost
~$OOQl
Uni
Cosill
19,794
3,153
22,118
45,0~
Total Cost
J$OOQl
Uni
Cost~$
OPERATIONSjpIRECT)
Management * *
115,543
1,285
62,898
949
78,090
1,733
Services
Furnishings
Miscellaneous
Sub-Total Direct Operations
Anticj.P-atedReimbursements
Gross Obligations, Operations
31,221
46,004
2,077
194,845
1,065
195,910
347
511
18
1,278
12
2,178
26,070
41,959
2,396
133,323
1,014
134,337
393
633
36
2,011
15
2,026
25,740
41,932
2,407
148,169
952
149,121
571
930
53
3,288
21
3,309
UTILITIES lDIRECll
Direct Utilities
AnticlP-ated Reimbursements
Gross Obligations, Utilities
163,857
3,398
167,255
1,822
38
1,859
125,459
3,247
128,706
1,893
49
1,942
116,946
2,882
119,828
2,595
64
2,659
MAINTENANCE jJ;)IRECT)
M&R Dwelling
M&R Ext. Utiities
M&R Other Real Property
Alter & Add.
Sub-Total Direct Maintenance
Anticj.P-atedReimbursements
Gross Obligations, Maintenance
196,476
88,073
32,361
28,906
345,816
6,477
352,293
2,184
979
360
2,184
3,845
72
4,608
258,353
117,255
37,729
33,615
446,952
7,335
454,287
3,897
1,769
569
507
6,742
111
6,853
232,841
40,747
24,367
12,524
310,479
7,948
318,427
5,167
904
541
278
6,890
176
7,066
GRAND TOTAL, O&M -Direct
Anticipated
Reimbursements
GRAND TOTAL, O&M -TOA
704,518
10,940
715,458
7,833
122
7,954
705,734
11,596
717,330
10,646
175
10,821
575,594
11,782
587,376
12,773
261
13,034
* Inventory has been adjusted from previous budget to reflect program and execution changes
* * For FY 2004 column, Management overstated due to the inclusion of the FY2004 CMA funding ($42,415K)
February
2005
Page No.4
6 9
DEPARTMENT
MILITARY
FISCAL
USAF
FY2006
2006
HOUSING
BUDGET
REQUEST
PB
Fiscal Year:
Family
Housing
Operation
Excludes Leased Units and Costs
Conterminous
YEAR
OF THE AIR FORCE
FAMILY
and
Maintenance,
Summary
Command:
Exhibit:
2006
USAF
FH-2
US
FiscalYear:
2004
Inventory DatajUnits)
Units in Being Beginning of Year
Units in Being at End of Year
Average Inventory for Year
2005
66,550
57,894
62,222
Historic Units
57,894
21,552
39,723
1,02
Fundi~R~uirements
($000)
Total Cost
-I$OOO)
Uni
Costj$
2006
21,552
18,036
19,794
1,01
Total Cost
-I$OOQl
Uni
Costj$
92~
Total Cost
-I$OOQl
Unit
Coslli
OPERATIONS -IDIREC"!l
Management
Services
Furnishings
Miscellaneous
Sub-Total Direct Operations
Antici2-ated Reimbursements
Gross Obligations, Operations
49,560
14,661
3,717
809
68,747
781
69,528
797
236
60
13
1,105
13
1,117
38,865
7,415
3,471
1,072
50,823
668
51,491
978
187
87
27
1,279
17
1,296
53,298
10,706
3,224
782
68,010
571
68,581
2,693
541
163
40
3,436
29
3,465
UTILITIES jDIREC"!}
Direct Utilities
Antici2-ated Reimbursements
Gross Obligations, Utilities
81,147
3,133
84,280
1,304
50
1,355
73,910
2,924
76,834
1,861
74
1,934
53,648
2,567
56,215
2,710
130
2,840
134,857
65,356
24,014
21,450
245,677
1,755
247,432
2,167
1,050
386
345
3,948
28
3,977
153,422
69,632
22,405
19,962
265,421
2,032
267,453
3,862
1,753
564
503
6.682
51
6,733
128,082
1,411
10,645
2,255
142,393
1,778
144,171
6,471
71
538
114
7,194
90
7,284
MAINTENANCE jpIRECT)
M&R Dwelling
M&R Ext. Utiities
M&R Other Real Property
Alter & Add.
Sub-Total Direct Maintenance
Antici2-ated Reimbursements
Gross Obligations, Maintenance
GRAND
TOTAL,
Anticipated
GRAND
* Inventory
February
O&M
-Direct
395,571
Reimbursements
TOTAL,
O&M
-TOA
has been adjusted
2005
5,669
401,240
from previous
budget
6,357
390,154
9,822
264,051
13,340
91
5,624
142
4,916
248
6,449
395,778
9,963
268,967
13,588
to reflect program
and execution
changes
Page
No.4
7 0
DEPARTMENT
MILITARY
FISCAL
YEAR
OF THE AIR FORCE
FAMILY
2006
HOUSING
BUDGET
REQUEST
USAF FY2006 PB
Family
Housing
Operation
Excludes Leased Units and Costs
and
Maintenance,
Summary
FiscalYear:
2006
Command:
Exhibit:
USAF
FH-2
US Overseas
FiscalYear:
Invent~
Data lUnits)
Units in Being Beginning of Year
Units in Being at End of Year
2004
Aver'C!.9:.e
Invent<?-!y'-forYear
2005
6,122
4,766
4,766
3,806
3,806
2,500
5,444
4,286
3,153
Historic Units
3
Total Cost
Fundi~R~uirements~OOQl
l$OOQl
OPERATIONS iDIRECn
Management
Services
4,051
2,122
Furnishings
Miscellaneous
Sub-Total Direct Operations
Anticipated Reimbursements
Gross Obligations, Operations
2,255
0
8,428
0
8,428
UTILITIES1DIREC"!l
Direct Utilities
Anticl2-ated Reimbursements
Gross Obligations, Utilities
MAINTENANCE iDIRECT)
M&RDwelling
M&R Ext. Utiities
M&ROtherRealProperty
Alter & Add.
Sub-Total Direct Maintenance
AnticlP-ated Reimbursements
Gross Obligations, Maintenance
GRAND
TOTAL,
O&M
-Direct
Anticipated
Reimbursements
GRAND
TOTAL, O&M -TOA
* Inventory
February
2006
has been adjusted
2005
Uni
CosW
744
390
3
Total Cost
l$OOQl
Uni
CosW
3
Total Cost
Uni
l$OOQl
Cost ($
3,608
6,021
842
1,405
4,570
1,202
1,449
381
414
0
1,548
0
1,548
10,738
6
20,373
0
20,373
2,505
1
4,753
0
4,753
908
0
6,680
0
6,680
288
0
2,119
0
2,119
26,287
0
26,287
4,829
0
4,829
9,776
0
9,776
2,281
0
2,281
18,498
0
18,498
5,867
0
5,867
4,051
2,122
2,255
0
8,428
1,072
9,500
744
390
414
0
1,548
197
1,745
5,097
1,112
1,912
0
8,121
1,098
9,219
1,189
259
446
0
1,895
256
2,151
17,869
244
997
289
19,399
1,511
20,910
5,667
77
316
92
6,153
479
6,632
43,143
7,925
38,270
8,929
44,577
14,138
1,072
44,215
197
8,122
1,098
39,368
256
9,185
1,511
46,088
479
14,617
from previous
budget to reflect program
and execution
changes
Page
Nc4 71
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
USAF
Family
FY2006
PB
Housing
Operation
and Maintenance,
Summary
Excludes Leased Units and Costs
Fiscal Year:
2006
Command:
USAF
Exhibit:
FH-2
Foreign
FiscalYear:
2004
2005
2006
Invent~
Data -LUnits)
Units in Being Beginning of Year
Units in Being at End of Year
22,282
22,282
22,282
22,282
22,282
21,953
Averagelnvent~forYear
22,282
22,282
22,118
Historic Units
L
~
Uni
Cosli$
61,932
14,438
2,779
648
20,425
12,634
917
494
20,222
13,832
914
625
40,032
1,268
117,670
284
117,954
1,797
57
5,281
13
5,294
27,750
1,318
62,127
346
62,473
1,245
59
2,788
16
2,804
37,800
1,625
73,479
381
73,860
1,709
73
3,322
17
3,339
UTILITIES -.iDIRECT)
Direct Utilities
Antic1Q9ted Reimbursements
Gross Obligations, Utilities
56,423
265
56,688
2,532
12
2,544
55,567
323
55,890
2,494
14
2,508
44,800
315
45,115
2,026
14
2,040
MAINTENANCE -.iDIRECT)
M&R Dwelling
M&R Ext. Utiities
M&R Other Real Property
Alter & Add.
Sub-Total Direct Maintenance
AnticlQ?ted Reimbursements
Gross Obligations, Maintenance
57,568
20,595
6,092
7,456
91,711
3,650
95,361
2,584
924
273
335
4,116
164
4,280
99,834
46,511
13,412
13,653
173,410
4,205
177,615
4,480
2,087
602
613
7,783
189
7,971
86,890
39,092
12,725
9,980
148,687
4,659
153,346
3,929
1,767
292
451
6,723
211
6,933
Fundi':!.a R~uirernents
($OO~
OPERATIONS -1DIREC"!}
Management..
Services
Furnishings
Miscellaneous
Sub-Total Direct Operations
AnticJpated Reimbursements
Gross Obligations, Operations
GRAND TOTAL, O&M -Direct
Anticipated
Reimbursements
GRAND TOTAL, O&M -TOA
265,804
4,199
270,003
11,929
188
12,118
Total Cost
j§OOQ}
291,104
4,874
295,978
Uni
Cosli$
0
Total Cost
-1$00~
13,065
219
13,283
Total Cost
($000)
266,966
5,355
272,321
Uni
Cost ($
12,070
242
12,312
* Inventory has been adjusted from previous budget to reflect program and execution changes
* * For FY 2004 column, Management overstated due to the inclusion of the FY2004 CMA funding ($42,415K)
February 2005
Page No.4
7 2
DEPARTMENT
OF THE
MILITARY
FISCAL
FY 2006
Budget
Summary
Estimate
of Historic
YEAR
FAMILY
2006
AIR
FORCE
HOUSING
BUDGET
REQUEST
Submission
Housing
Detail
Fiscal Year:
1. Historic
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
2.
Housing
Costs,
2004
Fiscal Year:
2006
MAJCOM:
USAF
Exhibit:
FH-6
2005
2006
Non-GOQ Data
Number of Non-GOQ units on NHRP (Inventory)
Improvement Costs ($000)
Maintenance and Repair Costs ($000)
Total Historic Maintenance, R~air, Im~ovements
Average Cost Per Unit ($000)
Historic Housing Costs, GOQ Data
998
1,390
3,879
5,269
5
998
27,635
3,144
30,779
31
203
587
7,168
7,755
38
a. Number of GOQ units on NHRP (Inventory)
b. Improvement Costs ($000)
c. Maintenance and Repair Costs ($000)
d. Total Historic Maintenance, Re~ir, Im--p-rovements ~$OOQl
e. Average Cost Per Unit ($000)
3. Total Historic Inventory & Costs (Non-GOQ & GOQ)
55
404
626
1,030
19
38
1,300
388
1,688
44
6
2,116
317
2,433
406
a. Number of Non-GOQ and GOQ units on NHRP (Inventory)
b. Improvement Costs ($000)
c. Maintenance and Repair Costs ($000)
d. Total Historic Maintenance, Repair, Im~rovements
($000)
e. Average Cost Per Unit ($000)
1,053
1,794
4,505
6,299
6
1,036
28,935
3,532
32,467
31
209
2,703
7,485
10,188
49
February
2005
($000)
Page
No.4
7 3
This Page Intentionally
Left Blank
,
I
1
!
474
0 P E~I~i~\..
T ION S
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
Mll-ITARY FAMll-Y HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
RECONCll-IA TION OF INCREASES AND DECREASES
EXHIBIT OP-5
OPERATIONS
(Program In Thousands)
FY 2006Program$148,169
FY 2005Program$133,323
The FY 2006programrepresentsAir Force family housingrequirementsandwasdeveloped
using OSD/OMBapprovedinflation andforeign currencyfluctuationrates. Adjustmentshave
beenmadefor force structurechangesand missionrealignments.All programsub-accounts
are
describedin detail in the following analyses:
February2005
PageNo.4
75
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
Management. The Managementaccountincludesinstallation-level housing office operations,occupancy
and contractorinspections,administrative support, community liaison, and the housing referral program,
which assistsmembersin finding homes in the private sector. It also supportsstudies suchas the housing
requirementsand market analysesand preliminary studiesand surveyrequirementsfor construction
plans.
($ in Thousands)
1.
FY 2005 President's Budget
2.
CongressionalAdjustments:
$70,680
a. Congressional Reduction
-$7,782
3.
FY 2005 Appropriated Amount:
$62,898
4.
Supplementals:
None
5.
Price Growth:
None
6.
Functional Program Transfers:
None
7.
Program Increases:
None
8.
Program Decreases:
None
9.
FY 2005 Current Estimate
$62,898
10.
Price Growth:
None
11.
Functional Program Transfer:
None
12.
Program Increases:
a. Inflation (1.6%)
+$1,006
b. Foreign Currency Rate Adjustment
+$5,259
c. Programmatic Adjustments
+$1,007
d. Transfer from Another Agency
14.
+$407
e. IncreasedForeign National Salaries Costs
+$7,513
FY 2006 Budget Request:
$78,090
February 2005
PageNo.
476
I
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
Analvsis of Chan{!e in Management
The Managementsub-accountconsistspredominatelyof fixed costssuchas salariesandrequired
administrativesupportsuppliesandequipment.However,aspart of our management
activity, we
continueto use,modify andprovide training on the AutomatedCivil EngineerSystem-Housing
Module (ACES-HM). This systemimprovescustomerservicesand datasharingfor overall program
management.Training supportis alsoincludedto supporttraining requirementsfor housing
operations,furnishingsmanagement,assetmanagement,
and generalofficer quartersmanagement.
The managementsub-accountprovidesfunds for HousingRequirementsand MarketAnalysesat
eachinstallationto determinethe properamountof housingneededto supportthe assigned
population;supportsthe Family Housing MasterPlan, which is the sourcedocumentfor future
housingdecisions;andfunds GeneralOfficer QuarterMasterPlan efforts.
The increasedpaceof housingunit inventoryreductioncontinuesto drive the costper unit up but
managementeffort is not reducedon the samegraduatedscaleas inventoryreduction.The
Managementsub-accountis not per-unitspecificsincethereis a basiclevel of supportandmanning
for housingoffices regardlessof the numberof units. The managementeffort at installations
privatizing housingwill graduallybe reducedto an appropriatelevel for inherentlygovernmental
tasksto include assetmanagement,
housingrelocationandreferralservices,and fiscal analysis.
During major constructionphasesof privatizedunits, governmentoversightis required. Manning
levelswill remainrelativelystableuntil constructioncompletionat which time they shoulddecrease
as a minimum 20 percent. For baseswith competitivelysourcedoperations,the Air Forcemust
continueto provide oversightsupportand adviseinstallationleadership.
The declinein value of the U.S. dollar comparedto othercountries'currencieshasresultedin the
necessityof establishinga lower exchangerate consistentwith the downwardtrend of the dollar.
Military family housingoverseasis not privatized,so costshaverisen dramaticallyrelativeto the
dollar. This hastranslatedinto increasedmanagement
costs,primarily for salaries.
February2005
PageNo.4
77
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
Services.Providesbasicmunicipal-typesupportservicessuchasrefusecollectionand disposal;fire
andpolice protection;entomologyand pestcontrol; snowremoval;and streetcleaningand custodial
servicesfor government-ownedfamily housingunits.
($ in Thousands)
1.
FY 2005 President'sBudget
$26,070
2.
Congressional
Adjustments:
None
3.
FY 2005AppropriatedAmount:
4.
Supplementals:
None
5.
PriceGrowth:
None
6.
FunctionalProgramTransfers:
None
7.
ProgramIncreases:
None
8.
ProgramDecreases:
None
9.
FY 2005 CurrentEstimate
10.
$26,070
$26,070
PriceGrowth:
a. Inflation (1.6%)
11.
FunctionalProgramTransfer:
12.
ProgramIncreases:
+$417
None
a. IncreasedCostsfor ServiceContracts
+ $6,580
b. Foreign CurrencyFluctuation(FCF)RateAdjustment
+$4,646
c. Transferfrom AnotherAgency
13.
14.
ProgramDecreases:
a. Inventorydecrease(-21,224units x $571/unit= -$12,119)
FY 2006 BudgetRequest:
February2005
.--
+$146
-$12,119
$25,740
PageNo.
478
-1111111DEPARTMENT
OF
MILITARY
FISCAL
Analysis
The
of
Changes
Services
budget
units.
However,
locations.
Per
contracts
(refuse
Until
The
decline
not
has
of
2006
FORCE
BUDGET
are
of the
into
decreased
are
REQUEST
result
U.S.
a lower
increased
as a result
at installations
due
primarily
entomology/pest
will
establishing
translated
been
be required
increases
contracts
in value
has
will
cost
in privatization
necessity
This
request
collection,
privatization
Delays
YEAR
AIR
HOUSING
in Services
services
unit
THE
FAMILY
actually
service
scheduled
are
not
privatization
privatizing
costs
of
and
in service
and
housing
in overseas
maintenance
control).
awarded,
compared
exchange
that
to increased
funds
in non-programmatic
dollar
of the
to
other
rate
consistent
costs,
especially
still
required
increases
are
to this
countries'
with
since
to provide
currencies
the
downward
military
services.
account.
family
has
resulted
trend
of the
housing
in the
dollar.
overseas
privatized.
February
2005
Page
No.4
79
is
-111111111DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
Furnishings.Includesthe procurementfor initial issueand replacementof householdequipment
(primarily stovesand refrigerators)and in limited circumstancesoverseas,furniture; the control,
moving, andhandlingof furnishingsinventories;andthe maintenanceandrepair of suchitems.
Loanersetsof furniture areissuedto military families overseasso they may occupypermanent
quartersprior to the arrival of their personallyownedfurniture. "Loanerkits" consistingof tables,
beds,sofas,allow membersto establishthemselvesin a housingunit beforetheir householdgoods
arrive. Loanerkits are very costeffectivebecausetheyreducethe costof temporaryquarters. Other
items of householdfurnishings,normally built into CONUShouses,which are limited or not
included in foreign countrylocal constructionstandards,suchaswardrobes(clothesclosets),kitchen
cabinetsor sideboardsandappliances,arealso issuedto military families.
Housing in Europealso oftenrequiresthat closets(armoirs)and kitchencabinetsbe issuedsince
Europeanunits do not havethe closetsthat areexpectedin the United Statesandkitchensusuallydo
not comeequippedwith cabinets.
The furnishingsaccountfundsessentialfurnishingsat levels consistentwith the needsof the
Air Force. Much of the funding requestedin the furnishingsaccountresultsfrom an analysisof the
mosteconomicalor costeffective way to fulfill servicerequirements.Issuingfurnishingsby the
governmentavoidshighercostsin otheraccountssuchas military allowancesand other support
appropriations.
($ in Thousands)
1.
FY 2005President'sBudget
2.
Congressional
Adjustments:
$44,459
a. CongressionalReduction
-$2,500
3.
FY 2005AppropriatedAmount:
$41,959
4.
Supplementals:
None
5.
PriceGrowth:
None
6.
FunctionalProgramTransfers:
None
7.
ProgramIncreases:
None
8.
ProgramDecreases:
None
9.
FY 2005 CurrentEstimate
10.
$41,959
PriceGrowth:
February2005
PageNo.4 8 0
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
a. Inflation (1.6%)
b. Foreign CurrencyFluctuation(FCF)RateAdjustment
+$671
+$7,843
11.
FunctionalProgramTransfer:
None
12.
ProgramIncrease:
None
13.
ProgramDecreases:
a. Inventorydecrease:
-$3,854
CONUS: (-19,929units x $ 163/unit= -$3,248)
US Overseas:(-1,133units x $288/unit= -$326)
Foreign: (-164units x $1,709/unit= -$280)
14.
b. ReducedRequirementfor ReplacementFurnishings
-$4,687
FY 2006 BudgetRequest:
$41,932
Analvsis of ChanQ:esin Furnishings
Furnishingscostsaretrendingdownwardoverthe long term from over$50 million peryear in the
late 1980'sto $41.9M in FY06. Inventoryreductionsfrom privatizationdrive decreasesin the
fundsrequired;however,all of the inventorydecreases
are in the CONUS or US overseasareas,so
the effect on the accountis minimal.
However,the decline in valueof the U.S. dollar comparedto othercountries'currencieshasresulted
in the necessityof establishinga lower exchangerate consistentwith the downwardtrend of the
dollar. This hastranslatedinto lost savingssincea significantportionof furnishingsrequirementsis
overseas.
February2005
PageNo.4
81
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
Miscellaneous. Includes mobile home hookups, leased office and warehouse spacesupporting
family housing, payments to other Federal agencies or foreign governments (i.e. United Kingdom
and Australia) to operate housing units occupied by Air Force personnel, and similar costs. Also
includes reimbursement to the International Cooperative Administrative Support Services (ICASS)
Program administered by the Deptartment of State. ICASS is a system for managing and sharing the
administrative support costs of overseasoperations with US Foreign Affairs agenciesand other US
Government agencies that operate in countries where the Air Force does not have a significant
presence.
($ in Thousands)
1.
FY 2005 President's Budget
$2,396
2.
CongressionalAdjustments:
None
3.
FY 2005 Appropriated Amount:
4.
Supplementals:
None
5.
Price Growth:
None
6.
Functional Program Transfers:
None
7.
Program Increases:
None
8.
Program Decreases:
None
9.
FY 2006 Current Estimate
10.
b. Foreign Currency Fluctuation Rate Adjustment
11.
Functional Program Transfer:
12.
Program Increases:
a. Increasesin ICASS usage
+$38
+$585
None
+$513
Program Decreases:
a. Inventory decrease(-21,225 units x $53/unit = -$1,125)
14.
$2,396
Price Growth:
a. Inflation (1.6%)
13.
$2,396
FY 2006 Budget Request:
February 2005
-$1,125
$2,407
Page No.4
82
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
Analvsis of Chan2es in Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous requirements have remained relatively stable as the inventory has decreasedbecause
additional personnel have been stationed in locations where there is no significant Air Force
presence. As a result, ICASS billings have increasedas the Air Force has relied more heavily on the
Department of State for housing assistancein those areas. Furthermore, the decline in value of the
U.S. dollar compared to other countries' currencies has resulted in the necessityof establishing a
lower exchange rate consistent with the downward trend of the dollar.
February 2005
Page No.4
8 3
This Page Intentionally
Left Blank
"
484
,~
..~
" '""'"'" '" ".,
UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
RECONCILIATION OF INCREASESAND DECREASES
EXHIBIT OP-5
Utilities. This programprovidesfor all utilities consumedin government-owned
family housing.
Electricity, purchasedheating,water,sewageandwastesystemsareincluded. Military Family
Housing (MFH) facilities consumeapproximatelyone-sixthof Air Forcefacility energyusage;
therefore,MFH residentsand management
sharea significantrole in the achievementof Air Force
energyreductiongoals. The programmayalsofund MFH costsassociatedwith the privatizationof
utility systems.
($ in Thousands)
1.
FY 2005 President'sBudget
$125,459
2.
Congressional
Adjustments:
None
3.
FY 2005AppropriatedAmount:
4.
Supplementals:
None
5.
PriceGrowth:
None
6.
FunctionalProgramTransfers:
None
7.
ProgramIncreases:
None
8.
ProgramDecreases:
None
9.
FY 2005 CurrentEstimate
10.
$125,459
PriceGrowth:
a. Inflation (1.6%)
11.
FunctionalProgramTransfer:
12.
ProgramIncreases:
a. Transferfrom AnotherAgency
13.
$125,459
+$2,007
None
+$464
b. Offset for increasedenergyprices
+$31,397
c. ForeignCurrencyFluctuationRateAdjustment
+$12,698
ProgramDecreases:
a. Inventorydecrease(-21,225units x $2,595/unit= -$55,079)
-$55,079
February2005
PageNo.4
85
1..11
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
14.
FY 2006 BudgetRequest:
$116,946
Analysis of Chaneesin Utilities
Recentworld eventshaveresultedin significantincreasesin the price of oil. Althoughthese
increasesmaymoderateby FY06 we believe it is prudentto plan for energypricesthat areaboveour
recentbudgetinglevel of $1,900 perunit. As we look to the future basedon currentDepartmentof
Energyprojections,we expectstableto slowly increasingenergyprices. The requirementfor FY06
has beendevelopedfrom historical expendituresasadjustedfor inventoryreductions. FY06
expendituresareprojectedat $117M or $2,595perunit. The FY05 per unit costswere slightly less
thanthis, at $1,893. FY06 funding is budgetedat a per unit rate that reflectsthe FY04 actual
programplus costincreases.The upward adjustmentshownin the OP-5 abovewasmadeto achieve
this level of funding perunit.
This level of funding is dependentuponsuccessfulcompletionof the aggressivehousingprivatization
program. If theseprojectsaredelayedadditionalfunding will be requiredto paythese"must pay"
bills. The only sourceof flexibility within the MFH accountsis in the maintenancesub-account.
Furthermore,if the utility systemsare awardedto a utilities privatizationcontractor,dependingon the
contract,eitherthis accountor the maintenanceaccountwill covergovernmentcostsfor up-front
capitalinvestmentsto the system. To the maximumextentpossible,utilities will be privatized
throughthe housingprivatizationcontractors-in this casetherewill be no governmentcostsincethe
systemswill not be governmentsupported.If utilities areprivatizedseparately,capital investments
associatedwith operatingandmaintainingthesesystemscanno longerbe deferredandbecomea
must paybill.
The decline in valueof the U.S. dollar comparedto othercountries'currencieshasresultedin the
necessityof establishinga lower exchangerate consistentwith the downwardtrend of the dollar.
This hastranslatedinto increasedutility costs,especiallyelectricity, steamheat,and watercosts,
sincemilitary family housingoverseashas not yet beenprivatized.
February2005
PageNo. 486
MAINTENANCE
,.
h'
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
Mll..UARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
RECONCILIATION OF INCREASES AND DECREASES
EXHIBU OP-5
Maintenance. Provides upkeep of family housing real property through service calls, change of
occupancyrehabilitation, routine maintenance,preventive maintenance, interior and exterior
painting, and major repairs. Pastlimited maintenance funding and a high occupant turnover have
accelerated deterioration of the Air Force housing inventory. Housing condition assessments
conducted for the Air Force Family Housing Master Plan (FHMP) substantiate that the
maintenance and repair funding profile representsa balanced, fiscally constrained program that is
consistent with the DOD goal to revitalize all our inadequate housing by or before 2007/2009,
while ensuring sufficient Real Property Maintenance by Contract (RPMC) funds are available to
maintain the existing adequateinventory. The program is also the fund source for any MFH
maintenance and repair chargesassociatedwith the privatization of utility systems which are
separatefrom the housing privatization initiative.
MFH maintenance is broken into two types of service. The first is routine recurring work such as
answering service calls and doing repairs necessaryto keep a house habitable, like repairing
leaking faucets, replacing broken windows, or replacing furnace filters. It includes maintenance
performed upon change of occupancy, such as painting, or carpet replacement.
The Air Force FHMP draws a distinct line between military construction and maintenance
funding. Architect and engineering firms gathered housing condition assessmentdata on every
housing type in the Air Force. This data documents the existing condition of major housing
systemcomponents (ex: roofs, furnaces, carpet, window, cabinets) and then, using industry
standard life cycles, projects the replacement requirement for these components (ex: roof: 15-20
years; gas furnace: 20 years). The overall condition of housing components and replacement cost
determined whether each requirement was projected for replacement or improvement through the
military construction program or to be maintained using RPMC funds. This databasewas then
used to project future facility funding requirements.
($ in Thousands)
1.
FY 2005 President's Budget
$435,782
2.
Congressional Adjustments:
None
a. Reduction for three GOQ Projects Exceeding M&R Threshold
-$230
3.
FY 2005 Appropriated Amount:
February 2005
$435,552
Page No.4
8 7
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
Mll..ITARYFAMll..YHOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
i
4.
Supplementals -Disaster Relief:
5.
Price Growth:
None
6.
Functional Program Transfers:
None
7.
Program Increases:
None
8.
Program Decreases:
None
9.
FY 2005 Current Estimate
10.
$446,952
Price Growth:
a. Inflation (1.6%)
11.
Functional Program Transfers
12.
Program Increases:
a. Foreign Currency Rate Adjustment
13.
$11,400
$7,151
None
+$32,554
b. Transfer from Another Agency
+$1,979
c. Nonpay PurchaseAdjustments
+$4,958
Program Decreases
a. Inventory Decrease(-21,225 x $6,890Iunit = $146,240)
-$146,240
b. Privatization savings
-$36,875
FY 2006 Budget Request
$310,479
Analvsis of Chan!!es in Maintenance Program
The FY06 maintenance account reflects Air Force FHMP priorities and begins to show the
effects of the privatization program. As a result of Mll..CON and housing privatization, the Air
Force FHMP projects the need to revitalize approximately 23,500 inadequatehouses in FY06.
As long as privatization initiatives and Mll..CON projects remain on track, the Air Force will be
able to properly invest and complete required maintenance on existing units to keep good units
good. Delays in the award of privatization projects will result in non-programmatic reductions to
February 2005
Page No.4
8 8
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
this account. The maintenance account is the only source of funds available to cover
unprogrammed increases in must-pay accounts (i.e. management,services, utilities).
Furthermore, if the utility systemsare awardedto a utilities privatization contractor, depending
on the contract provider, either this account or the utilities account will cover government costs
for up-front capital investments to the system. To the maximum extent possible, utilities will be
privatized through housing privatization contracts -in this case,there will be no government cost
since the systemswill not be government supported. !futilities are privatized separately,capital
investments associatedwith operating and maintaining these systemscan no longer be deferred
and become a must pay bill.
The decline in value of the U.S. dollar compared to other countries' currencies has resulted in the
necessityof establishing a lower exchangerate consistent with the downward trend of the dollar.
This has translated into lost savings of since military family housing overseasis not privatized and
still requires full maintenance.
February 2005
Page No.4
,~.
89
This Page Intentionally
Left Blank
490
MAINTENANCE
&
REPAIR OVER $20K
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
NON-GOQUNITS
This informationcomplieswith the Houseof Representatives,
Military ConstructionAppropriationsBill (Conference
Report106-221)requiringthe Servicesto reportmajormaintenance
andrepairexpenditures
projectedto exceed
$20,000perunit. While theseprojectsareshownasline itemshere,themaintenance
budgetestimateincludesthem
amongoverallrequirementsfor the entireinventory. AF Policyis to programprojectsthatexceed$20Kthreshold
whenwork cannotawaitMILCON funding. Workincludesactionsthat keep"goodunitsgood",protectlife, safety,
andhealth,andensurefacility preservation.
Location
Base
No of
Vnits
High Unit
Year Built Cost ($000) Vnit (NSM) Proj (NSM)
Improvements NonTotal Cost Routine FY2001-2005
($000)
($000)
CONUS
FL
Patrick
64
1993-96
44
93-135
8,068
1,501
0
Replaceall windowsand slidingglassdoorswith energyefficientwindowsand slidingglassdoors. Repaircrackson
all exteriorsurfacesand exteriorfinish insulationsystem(EFIS)on all exteriorstuccosurfaces.Apply color finish
coating. Provideguttersanddownspouts
andrepairfascia.
February
2005
Page
No.491
This Page Intentionally
Left Blank
492
GFOQ O&M COSTS
DEPARTMENT OF THE Am FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
GENERAL OFFICERS QUARTERS
This information complies with the 2004 MILCON Appropriations Act languagerequiring the Servicesto report
any expenditures from the maintenanceaccount for Generalor Flag Officer housing projected to exceed$35,000
per unit.
AF Policy is that all work performed in GOQs will be consistentwith the Individual Facility Profile (preparedas
part of the GOQ Master Plan) for the affected quarters. Policy calls for programming projects that exceed $35K
threshold when work in not eligible for or cannot await MILCON funding. Work includes actions that keep
"good units good", protect life, safety, and health, and ensurefacility preservation. Total maintenancecosts
shown below include routine maintenanceactions (e.g. service calls, grass cutting) and major maintenenance
actions.
co,!""'!,
Location
::
Base
Q~rs ill
,:Size
Year
""N~M"
Built
:':::Oper """
Total'ptilTotal
($QQQ)"
M~(pt
: "Total
,"Total,
O&M
Improvem~Ts NonRoutine FY:.2QO)-'
2005 ($000):
($000)
($000)
($000)
9.4
37
67.2
CONUS
CO
USAF
6950
1,073 1930
20.8
Academy
Projected maintenanceand repair costsinclude funding for changeof occupancymaintenanceand repair to
include carpetreplacement,grounds maintenanceand routine maintenanceand repair.
CO
USAF
6776
1,008
1930
23.2
9.4
53.1
85.7
Academy
Projected maintenanceand repair costs include funding for changeof occupancymaintenanceand repair to
include refinishing floors, grounds maintenanceand routine maintenanceand repair.
OVERSEAS
No Request
February 2005
Page No.
493
00
00
ER-ER-
co
C
C
N
;a
GI
>-
COlt)
M
a;a;
ER-ER-
oi
...
~
""iij
u
u.
f/)
.-CO
... C')
~
I'--CO
..It)
~
I'--
.E
C')
ER-ER- ...
..ER-
W
I-
.E
'c
:)
..
W
~
cn
(.,)
~
~~5
OZW
~~
GI~
u.-~ cn
~~I_
O
<,n
W
~
~~g'
..~
W
J:..-C
>-
~
I-..J".,
O
fD
u.~
.-~
~'"":
~~
'"":
g
ER-ER-
~
CON
NN
..;
o O "Cf/)
u.
GI"C
..Of/)
GI
:;;:..Um
GI><f/)
GI.-
UW~
~
0
.c~f/)O
Gl~
-"1-
C
~
oC):a~
OM
I-u.o
;u:-g~
ER-ER- ~
Z>-N
W~~
E"CGlm
tcc.=
tk::J>-
g.EGIc~g
-0
~«
I-I-W
m~~g
<~..J
a.~<
W"
C
m
C')CO
Glm
~
C
cn
-m
..-C
u.
It)~
It)_CO-
S
~ 0
~...
~
00
"C
C
m
C')C')
alai
~
~
.-
f/)
~
0
~
'- 0
Q;
c.
c
f/)
0
8'jij
"C
S
0(.)
It) co
mall'-c.
CO
'u
C
0
I'--
co
~
C
<
~
.c
U
U
~
'-'-
~
0
u.
0
u.LL
0
~
«
'-'-
:)
0
N
'.:{'.:{
0
..
E
°
<
I-'
(.)
I-'
-"C
S
13
(/)
-I
"'0
0
494
-
" ,
REIMBURSABLE
PRO
G~I~ ~~\
..M
/
,
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
Reimbursement.Includescollectionsreceivedfrom rentalof Air Forcefamily housingto foreign
nationals,civilians and others. Includedin the estimatearethe anticipatedreimbursements
dueto
memberswho voluntarily separatethat areauthorizedto live in governmentquartersfor up to six
monthsafter separation.
($ in Thousands)
1.
FY 2005 President'sBudget
$11,596
2.
CongressionalAdjustments:
None
3.
FY 2005 ProjectedAppropriatedAmount:
4.
Supplementals:
None
5.
PriceGrowth:
None
6.
FunctionalProgramTransfers:
None
7.
ProgramIncreases:
None
8.
ProgramDecreases:
None
9.
FY 2005 CurrentEstimate
10.
$
$11,596
PriceGrowth:
a. Inflation (1.6%)
+$186
11.
FunctionalProgramTransfer:
None
12.
ProgramIncreases:
None
13.
ProgramDecreases:
None
14.
FY 2006 BudgetRequest:
February2005
$11,782
PageNo.4
95
This Page Intentionally
Left Blank
496
I
LEASING
!
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
LEASING
Program($ in Thousands)
FY 2006 Program$154,907
FY 2005 Program$119,908
Pgmoseand Sco12e
Supportsleasingof privatelyownedhousingfor assignmentas governmentquartersat both
domesticandforeign locationswhenthe local economyandon-basehousingcannotsatisfy
requirements.The leasingprogramis authorizedby 10 U.S.C.2828andprovidesfor paymentof
rental,operations,andmaintenancecostsof privately-ownedquartersfor assignmentas government
quartersto military families. This programalsoincludesfundsneededto pay for servicessuchas
utilities andrefusecollectionwhentheseservicesare not part of the contractagreement.
The Air Forcecontinuesto rely on the private sectorto meetthe majority of housingneeds. Where
the private sectorrentalmarketsandon-basehousingcannotmeetrequirementsandcost-effective
alternativesdo not exist, shortand long-termleasesareused.The Air Forcemustusethe leasing
programin high costareasandoverseasto obtainadequatehousingto meetcritical needsandto
avoid unacceptablyhigh memberout-of-pocketcosts.
ProgramSummary-Highlights
Authorizationis requestedfor appropriationof $154,907to fund leasesandrelatedexpensesin FY
2006. The FY 2006 requestfor family housingleasingpoints is summarizedasfollows:
.
EYM
LeasePoints ~
Foreign*
9,105 2,726
Section801
5,800 3,835
Domestic
3,333
256
:EY..Q.1
Cost($000) ~
$48,260
2,739
$61,741
3,835
$4,229
244
~
Cost($000) ~
Cost($OOO)
$52,566
2,645 $86,079
$63,267
3,535 $64,831
$4,075
232
$3,997
* Reflectslower exchangerateof the dollar to foreign currencyin FY06.
ForeignLeasing
Congresscontrolsleasingin foreigncountries:first by the numberof leasepoints authorized,then
by the reviewand approvalof contractproposals,and finally by the fundsappropriated.Air Force
strategyis to provideadequatehousingfor our personnelwheremilitary family housingis not
availablethus avoidingexpensiveoff-basehousingentitlements.
September2004
PageNo.4 97
I
I
i
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
Section 801 Leasing
This program is helping to reduce our CONUS family housing deficit at baseswhere Air Force
families are seriously affected by housing shortagesand high housing costs.
In FY 1984, Congress authorized the testing of a new leasing program for U.S. installations in P.L.
98-115, Section 801. Nine housing communities were constructed. Later events have prompted the
closure of March AFB, CA and the leaseswere terminated. The FY06 budget reflects the
termination of300 leases at Eielson AFB, AK in August 2006. The current inventory of801leases
is shown in Exhibit FH4B.
Domestic and Foreign Leasing:(other than Section 80 I )
The Air Force supports independentduty personnelresiding in high cost rental areassuchas Los
Angeles and Boston. This supportis provided since housing within BAH rates is extremely limited.
~,
Foreign leasesare primarily provided at A viano, Lakenheath,Spangdahlem,Singapore,and the Central
Command area of responsibility. Areas under Central Command are provided leasesto support
accompaniedAir Force memberswhere military family housing is not available. Leasesare provided
for membersin other overseaslocations in which the Deptartmentof StateInternational Cooperative
Administrative Support Services (ICASS) program administersthe .leasewith the Air Force providing
appropriatefunding.
September2004
---
Page No.4 98
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
RECONCILIATION OF INCREASESAND DECREASES
EXHIBIT OP-5
Leasing
($ in Thousands)
1.
FY 2005 President'sBudget
$119,908
2.
CongressionalAdjustments:
None
3.
FY 2005 AppropriatedAmount:
4.
Supplementals:
None
5.
PriceGrowth:
None
6.
FunctionalProgramTransfers:
None
7.
ProgramIncreases:
None
8.
ProgramDecreases:
None
9.
FY 2005 CurrentEstimate
10.
$119,908
$119,908
PriceGrowth:
a. Inflation (1.6%)
$1,919
11.
FunctionalProgramTransfer:
None
12.
ProgramIncreases:
None
a. Transferfrom AnotherAgency
+$1,400
b. ForeignCurrencyFluctuationRateAdjustment
13.
+$33,345
ProgramDecreases:
a. Reductionof leasesat BuckleyAFB and OsanAB
14.
-$1,665
FY 2006 BudgetRequest:
$154,907
Analysisof ChanQesin Leasing
The attachedleasingchartsreflect changesto the programby locationsandtype of lease. These
requirementsarea direct resultof changesto missionbeddownsand otherhousingneeds. The
decline in value of the U.S. dollar comparedto othercountries'currencieshasresultedin the
February2005
PageNo.4
~-
--
99
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
necessityof establishinga lower exchangerate consistentwith the downwardtrend of the dollar.
This hastranslatedinto increasedleasingcosts,especiallysince91% of Air Forcenon-801leases
are for military family housingoverseas.
February2005
PageNo.5
00
DEPARTMENT
MILITARY
FISCAL
ANALYSIS
I
LOCATION
I
HOUSING
YEAR 2006 BUDGET
OF LEASED
UNITS (Other
REQUEST
than Section
FY 04
LOCATION
801)
FY 05
LEASE
# UNITS
DOMESTIC
OF THE AIR FORCE
FAMILY
COST
MONTHS
($000)
FY 06
LEASE
# UNITS
MONTHS
COST
($000)
LEASE
# UNITS
COST
MONTHS
($000)
LEASFS
Los Angeles,
CA
18
216
$374
18
216
$374
18
216
$492
San Antonio,
TX (A FRS)
86
1,032
$1,232
75
900
$1,082
86
1,032
$1,292
San Antonio,
TX (AFOATS)
36
432
$513
36
432
$513
36
432
$515
San Antonio,
TX (AFOATS)-
Puerto Rico
Denver, CO
Denver,
CO (High Cost)
New Boston,
NH
6
72
$108
6
72
$108
6
72
$110
75
900
$1,337
75
900
$1,337
56
672
$1,016
25
300
$520
25
300
$520
19
228
$402
2
24
$42
2
24
$42
2
24
$42
Alameda,
CA
2
16
$31
1
12
$27
1
12
$30
Pinedale,
WY
6
72
$72
6
72
$72
8
96
$98
3,064
4,229
2,928
4,075
Unassigned
TOTAL DOMESTIC
FOREIGN
LEASES
3,077
3,333
3,089
3,333
3,101
3,333
2,784
3,997
LEASES
Oslo, Norway
1
12
$37
1
12
$44
0
0
$0
Amman,
1
12
$27
1
12
$30
1
12
$49
5
60
$90
5
60
$91
5
60
$153
1
7
12
84
$35
$257
1
12
12
144
$39
$498
0
13
0
156
$0
$906
Cairo,
Jordan
Egypt
Brussels, Belgium
Doha, Qatar
Manama,
:
1
12
$32
1
12
$32
1
12
$53
Nairobi, Kenya
Bahrain
1
12
$21
2
24
$46
2
24
$76
Dijbouti
0
0
$0
1
12
$29
1
12
$48
Asmara,
Eritea
1
12
$14
1
12
$14
1
12
$24
Amman,
Jordan
$84
2
24
$34
3
36
$51
3
36
Muscat, Oman
0
0
$0
1
12
$25
1
12
$41
Islamabad,
1
12
$21
2
24
$43
2
24
$71
Pakistan
Doha, Qatar
1
12
$35
3
36
$102
3
36
$168
Abu Dhabi, UAE
1
12
$50
1
12
$50
1
12
$82
Bangkok,
1
12
$24
1
12
$27
1
12
$49
4
48
$312
4
48
$370
4
48
$633
Thailand
Chaing Mai, Thailand
Classified
Location
1
12
$30
1
12
$33
Classified
Location
0
0
$0
0
0
$0
Osan, Korea
Sembawang,
Aviano,
Singapore
Italy
1
12
C
$1,400
$2,408
199
2,388
$2,815
199
2,388
$2,889
100
1,200
117
1,404
$3,882
117
1,404
$3,944
117
1,404
$6,610
700
8,400
$13,717
701
8,412
$15,303
707
8,712
$25,413
Bonn, Germany
1
12
$18
1
12
$18
1
12
Izmir, Turkey
2
24
$56
1
12
$32
1
12
1,222
14,664
Lakenheath,
Stavanger,
UK
Norway
Paris, France
Paris, France
Spangdahlem,
Germany
Vienna, Austria
Copenhagen,
Denmark
Sanaa,Yemen
Unassigned
TOTAL FOREIGN
IGRAND TOTAL
LEASES
FH-4
February 2005
$59
C
$21,470
1,222
14,664
$23,509
1,222
$31
$54
14,664
$38,818
1
12
$55
1
12
$57
1
12
$94
7
84
$361
6
72
$366
6
72
$622
2
24
$95
2
24
$95
2
24
$160
440
5,280
$4,544
440
5,280
$4,544
440
4,224
$7,496
1
12
$44
1
12
$54
1
12
$89
4
48
$168
4
48
$171
4
48
$287
1
12
$15
3
36
$60
3
36
$101
6,379
9,105
32,712
1112,438 1
35,776
48,260
I
6,366
9,105
52,4891112,438
32,868
1
35,796
I
52,566
6,460
9,105
56,641
II 12,438
30,912
1
33,696
86,079
I
90,0761
Page No.
501
-
0
-0)
'"
:I
,~
~~
~
I-
~ ~
~ ~
~~~~
~ ~ ~
~~N.~~N_~N.~~~~N_N.~
~ ~ ~ ~
0
~NNN
NNNNNN
~~~~~~
NNNN
~~~~
C/)
0) a) 0) N a)
~o~~
Lo.I O
v~
o)
"c
O)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
00000
II,"
C/) I~Oz
IO~
-'
~~
<D<D<D<D<D<DZ<D~<DZ<D<D<D<D
NNN
~~~
Z
0
~OON
M
~~~
~
~~NVa)
~N~~~
<D
t/,~
WI-
N~O~v<D~O~a)VNNO~
M~MO)~<DMM~<DVMO~NN
~~~~~M~~v~~~~~~<D
~
~
~~
~
~~
N'"
~~
,.:
C/)
0
CI'"
I-
C/)
w
::>
(t 0 0
9zw
C/)::> I-
'«ow
~ <-'
W
~>::>
0
~ g!XI
-~
O
~<D
IZ>N
W(t(t
""0
Lo. 0
~~~
I-I-W
(t:J>
~~-J
~
0
Z
Z
"C
,=-J
E
~
.-
-;;;
,_"C
.
O)~
0)
",0)
.c
...~
...0
0
0)
'"
0)
"'0)
0"
~ ~ ~ ~
M O .OO
~ ~ N- N. ~ ~ N- ~ ~ N- ~ N. N. ~ ~
<D<D<D<D<D<D<D<D<D<D<D<D<D<D<D
-NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
~NNN
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<;!; ~
Z v
C/) ~
00
I.c'
u-
0
>-
w~
~o
w~
~ ~
~.- 0
I
0
",
0--g
",
---'"
;;;
",
..~
-I
~OONM
~~Nva)
0
v
(j:
0,"
-~
~
Z
<D~O~V~~~<Da)~N~OO~
~~MO)v~MN~~MMM~~a)
~N~~o)
~~~~~M~~N~~~~~
~~~
I-
v 0) 0) ~
~ ~ 0) 0) ~ 0) ~ 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) ~
0) ~ ~ ~
Z
M
O'OO
<D<D<D<D<D<D<D<D<D<D<D<D<D<D
-NNNNNNNNNNNNNN
~NNN
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"C
0)
C/)
~
0)
0)
~
~
N.
I-~
ff:J1C/)
0
0
0)
0 ;0:
T o O)
0
I
~
~
~
~
N
N
~
N
~
N
~
~
N
N
~~
~
~
N
N
~
N
~
~
~
~
N
N
N
~
v
<D
~
N
~
N
N
~O)
Q.'"
~~
v-"C>~"C
~~
~«
~«
Z
O)a)~Nv
~N
<D-JC/)
o~W..~
~
~a)~NN
~~N
1-c/)0)~
~
> 0 ~ D- 5
Lo.I-W
-J
~
~
M
~
Iii
LL
~
~
~
0 .~
0...
,=.~
'inU
~~
"'"C
Z
0
Lo.
>-.,
W~
C/) >< ~
~ I- 0
-J
-J .2 ui 0
ot="*o.8o
I
Z
W
c:
U
~
0)
E
0
i=.8C)-~"iij
C/)t=~~!XIw
~
~~"'~~'
0
'"
0
o~
..'
U,
"C
.-0)
'in~
C/) ~
~
~O)'"
"'>-~
~U'"
0 ~
Cl~-
~0)8
.c'"
uO)"
><
'"
~
'"
.--J
>
0
00) Z
O).D
~
:I
C/)
0
~
...
~
.C
§
-,
>
~
",..~
~ CD ~
o"""ocO?J~£Lo.
-§zE
-O)EcOO)
.!!1:g
OCE"'.-"'O)(ij:lEoo"'~o.D:=.'
O N C/) «> D- .-n
u-""',,'
0 ~
_LL.!!}.~
~°ui'"
w..,;
g ~
.J-
ZI-Cl--
«
C/)-J
Z
'"
.t:
Co..Q
~ « 0 0 0 ,
"'"
~~""",
0)
0
.t::o:;"iij
."'cO°:lo
~
.-:" W
.t:
:I
.8
I-
0
::; .Ai 0
'0
CI -E.
woO)
In-~
~E
-J>~
~
v
I-~
1n"C
Q~5
w...
I .WO)
Lo.
~
0
0 « 0 ~
~
C/)
~
I-
I-
0
I-
1n5:
Om
0
O~
0)
U
><
0)
'"
-..~
(t"'O0)
~
E
1-'".-Q.
In a:
0)
j
U
5
e
-Q.
0
0)
I-
'"
w
0)
CI
~
l(t
~
z
...
--a.
~
~
w
~.c~
~
~
<-' ...m
~OC
<-'
-~
-..3
---
~
"C
"C
0)
0)
..I-
~
~
i
'"
00'"
OO)"C
Z
0
0
"C
'"
..~
zLo.O)
~
CI
.Ai
0
-0)
...'"
~w
j
U
...
0
~
O)~.c
.~
...
~
..0
.~ u.~
0)
'"~
.m
j
U
~
m:l.c
-~
5
0)
0)
j
~
s
B
U
~
ON
Z
I-
E
~
>"C
-J~
Inc/)~",-C/)::>
~~::>~~
E ~~~Lo.~Z~o
O)~.-WW
W ~
C C/) ~
'" ~.~
~ ;:
0 ~
~ 0 «
In
0 ::> 0) .t= 0) C)"C
~
..:- >- -s ~::>
~
~
0
~
~
'"
m
-CI
-m
>-
o..m
~~
~
~>-z~u-
~
0)
O)"~
"'::
..m
"'~
m"C"Ct
w>C/)..
0
W ~
-.;::.
-J~~~Il:~~
~
"C
EO)o
O
E
I-~
~
"~W
@"' E OOOw~
j
~
...",
~O)
0 ~ ~
0
Z o l-
~
C/) ~
w w
>0
~~
Lo.~>~
~~1ii~~0~
I--C/)~
~
0
0
~
0
'"
~~
0)
0)
~.c
a)
~
.c
>
"Cm'"
a)
O
"'.=
"C
0)
~.~
...U
0)",
~
<D
0
~
00)
u5
o
~
C/)
oc
~
,-
~
Q. 0)
m~
Uj
,~
"C
m m
~
~
U
~
Q."
0
D-
'in
>
:c.c
v
0
~
~
~m
>U
0)
~
0) -0
ClO
~'"
N~ON~~~~Mv~~M~~~
0
N
m
0)0)
0...
N
N~~N~<D~~~v~~~~OM
>
~
-~
m
0)
~ 0
~>
~O)~..
O)~
-0
~Oz
IO::>
0)
0)
",..
m
~
0)
Ic/)1,"
~
~
e
0)Q."~~
.~ m
~~
j",
~
'"
~ ~
0»<0)
'" >-
~.c
C/)
"'-
""c
mO)
0»
~
I-
.-CI
0~
~~
,Q
~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ M ~ ~ 1;;
0
0
~C~
~~
~w
-~
Z
0::>
U>
U ~
0
~o
UU>N
~
0
O)a)~Nv
~N
II-~
-I C
!Q
.~
~
U>...
...10"<-'.cL1.
:i:Q)
L1..c
Lo.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
O)O)~O)~O)~O)~O)~O)~O)~
.
~ai
...~
Q. '"
O)~O)~
'"
"C
O)~
0
.."C
Q.uj
o 0 ~ .=
(j:
~ O ~
C
>-'"0)
~
0)
>
"C
-~II-O)
~
---~
(t
U>
~
CI
's:. ,=
0
0
w
0
0
'Q."C
0)
~O)
:lU
E~
~
~
N
m
"'-
E
...''"
:I
'5"
'"
a)
0
<D
0)
~
~
E
'"
...~
~
a)
~~~N~~O~~VO~M~~M
0
0
~
"C
v
v
M
0)..
~
~
"C
'"
~
m.~
~
502
IIn
.
(/J
'-O
o f-..
~ ~
MOOOOO'-OOOO
'-OONOO\ONII")
""NOOMMMOM
11")11")0
M'-O o
11")0\11")
M" .-" or::
'
~
.~ (/J
Of-..
'""-" o(/J
r:
""U
'-OII")NOOO
.-'-0
II") N
O\OM\OOIl")N'1"
N' N' N' '1"'
~~
~~
~
r11")' r-'
'-OO\
r'1"
'1"'
~~
'1"'
~
r-0r'-0 ~
N
M'
'-0
'-0
N
M"
'-0
w
f-
U)
w
()c:
U)
~:)f-
«
o
wI""
I>-O
f--l:)
U-~CD
o«~
W
c:
w
",
f-CW
C:-l>«--l
(L~«
W
()
~
II")~
r~ Z
~5
MOOOOO'-OOOO
'-OONOO\ONII")
.-N
00 M M
-(/J
~f-..
OIl")r-Nr-OIl")'1"
0\0
-«
«~
~
-"
~U-RJ
~~~
0
c:C:
w
0 ",
""
zw a
U- -
()
c:
0
U->-
'-0 0,
M
MO\'1"O\NMNO\
~
..::
If-U)-"
~
",
U-",,(/)
o ,~
'-~.
r:o
-,..,
~~
N """"N
U
""O.'1"~'1"
r-
1I")00r-0'1"
N ~~
'1" '1" \0 '1" ~
'1"
~
11")11")0
M'-OO
00, 0\, 00"
M.-II")
~
r-
'-0"
'-0"
~
Oz-o
-t:
f- U) ro
Z:)(/)
wO
~
~I.2:.
f->-fC:-lE.
~~~
~~~
~-o~
za)
-Z
U)
:)-
o
~t;
>-W
(/J
'1"f-..
ez
rz5
~
0
RJ
>-
~
U- o~S
~~~
M o 00 o o \0 00 o
'-OONOO\ONII")
.-NOOMM\OO"M
.-M.-II")
~~~~~~~~
G~G~g~~g
~
0
O~O(/J<~~<
~
~
00~0\0\~0\~0\
11")\0""""0\
;-;
~
(/J(/J~~(/J(/J<~
~ro~
~~gz~~g~
II") II") o
M'-OO
00,0\"00"
~
0\
~
~
<
z
Z
-lU)
~
«
U-
~(/J
Of-..
.
~
MOOOOO\O~O
'-OONOO\oNII")
11")11")0
M'-OO
'-N~MM\OO,M
00"0\"00,
0
M.-II")
Z
~ ~
§
~
~, ~~~ ~ <I:~ ~, ~
f-..
~<'
~
~~~~~'~~~'
3
'C)<~~
~::§~
;:::o.e~>
0'P-.f-..
@~~
~<':@~
~ ~ aJj.~
~o;:::pS.~~~
~O~~f-..~~U
~J5~
S'§ ~
~ ~ 8
",e
~~~
~ "\3
~
"'~
~~
SO
503
This Page Intentionally
Left Blank
504
HOUSING
PRIV A TIZA TI 0 N
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILn'ARY FAMll..Y HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
HOUSING PRN ATIZATION
Prof!Iam (in Thousands)
FY 2006 Program $36,437
FY 2005 Program $39,104
Overview: The Air Force has, to date, awarded 12 projects and has 30 additional projects
scheduled through FY06 that will privatize 31,546 end stateunits. Although the Air Force has
acceleratedits privatization effort our pace has not been on track to meet the FY07 goal. As a
result, we are embarking on an effort to award groups of installations as one project, which will
provide economies of scale while accelerating the privatization effort. We plan to award a total
of 50 projects before the end of FY07.
Status of Awarded Projects:
Location
(Cityand State) SanAntonio, Abilene, TX
TX
Award Date
Total # of
privatizedunits
Type of Deal
(debt,equity)
Construction
Status
Est Construction
Complete
Warner
Robins,GA
Anchorage,
AK
Dayton,OH
Aug-98
Sep-OO
Sep-OO
Mar-01
Aug-02
420
402
670
828
1536
Debt
WI
Guarantee
Complete
Debt
WI
Guarantee
Complete
Debt
WI Guarantee
Debt
WI
Guarantee
Complete
Debt
Complete
52% complete;
Construction
Underwa
Nov-01
Sep-02
Jun-02
Sep-03
Aug-06
February 2005
Page No.5
-
05
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILffARYFAMILYHOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
(City and State)
Albuquerque,
NM
Cocoa Beach,
FL
Valdosta,
GA
Little Rock,
AR
Aurora, CO
Award Date
Apr-03
Oct-03
Feb-04
Jul-04
Aug-04
Total # of
privatized units
1,078
552
606
1,200
351
Debt
Debt
Type of Deal
(debt, equity)
Debt
WI Guarantee
Equity
Debt
Construction
Status
Demolition and
Construction
Underwa
Construction
underwa
Construction
underwa
Construction
underwa
Construction
underwa
Jun-06
Apr-05
Feb-10
Aug-10
Mar-06
Anchorage, AK
Boston, MA
Sep-04
Oct-04
1,194
784
Est Construction
Complete
Location
(City and State)
Award Date
Total # of
privatized units
Type of Deal
(debt, equity)
Debt
WI Guarantee
Construction
Status
Demolition and,
Construction
Underwa
February
2005
Debt
Construction
underwa
PageNo.5 0 6
l
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
Projects Included in FY06 Bud(!etReQuest:
NOTE: Details on the FY06 Privatizationprojectsareprovidedin the Family Housing Post
Acquisition sectionof this submission
I
February2005
PageNo. 507
.--
--
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
RECONCILIATION OF INCREASESAND DECREASES
EXHIBIT OP-5
HousingPrivatization: This programprovidesfor all MFH O&M fundedcostsrelatedto
privatization. The Air Forcepursuesprivatizationventuresto transferoperationand
maintenanceresponsibilityto the private sectorwherecosteffective. Acceleratedrevitalization
of housingassetsis the biggestbenefitfrom privatization.
($ in Thousands)
1.
FY 2005President'sBudget:
$39,104
2.
Congressional
Adjustments:
None
3.
FY 2005AppropriatedAmount:
4.
Supplementals:
None
5.
PriceGrowth:
None
6.
FunctionalProgramTransfers:
None
7.
ProgramIncreases:
None
8.
ProgramDecreases:
None
9.
FY 2005 CurrentEstimate
10.
$
$39,104
PriceGrowth:
a. Inflation (1.6%)
+$626
11.
FunctionalProgramTransfer:
None
12.
ProgramIncreases:
None
13.
ProgramDecreases:
14.
b. Reducedprogramrequirements
-$3,293
FY 2006 BudgetRequest:
$36,437
February2005
PageNo.5 08
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMIL Y HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
ExecutiveSummary:
The Air Forcerequests$36,437Kin the FY06 BudgetRequestfor HousingPrivatization. These
fundsarerequiredfor Air Force Centerfor EnvironmentalExcellence(AFCEE), MAJCOMs and
installationsto execute50 privatizationinitiatives identified in the Family HousingMasterPlan or
currentlyundergoinga privatizationfeasibility study. The fundsareprogrammedfor 1) project
conceptdevelopment,2) requestfor proposaldevelopmentand projectsolicitation, 3) project
constructionoversightfor local andfederalcodecompliance,4) portfolio management,
and 5) MAJCOM andbasespecific projectmanagement
support.
Typically, $3.5M is requiredduring the life of the projectto executeeachprivatization
initiative. This includes$1.3M in consultantfeesand environmentalstudiesrequiredfor initial
conceptdevelopment($225K), andRFPdevelopment,solicitationand award($1.1M). The
remaining$2.2M per projectis for constructionoversightat the installation($900K), yearlyinhousemanpowerexpensesat AFCEE ($120K),the dedicatedmanpowerexpensesat the bases
andMAJCOMs ($1.1M), andportfolio management
services($50K).
ReQuested
Detail:
Conce~tDeveloument: AFCEEusesfive privatizationsupportcontractors(PSCs),14civilian,
threemilitary and sevencontractin-houseprogrammanagersto team with MAJCOM andbase
personnelto "design" a privatizationprojectconceptthat identifiesand analyzesthe project
resourcesavailableor neededto producean economicallyfeasibleproject. Additionally, Air
Staff review, oversight,andguidanceis requiredthroughoutthe process.Basedon the current
executionschedule,we have $39.104Mprogrammedin FY05 for continuingthe currentinitiative
of 42 privatizationprojectscurrentlyin progressandprojectionsfrom the currentfeasibility
study. For 5 FY06 projectsaddedby Family HousingMasterPlan,we haveprogrammed
$1.125M.
Solicitation: AFCEE, usingPSCsand their in-houseprojectteam(engineers,lawyers,financial
managersand acquisitionpersonnel),work with the MAJCOMs and installationsto developand
issueprojectsolicitations. Thesedeveloperresponsesare thenevaluatedthrougha two-step
process.First, the numberof submittingdevelopersis narrowedbaseduponan evaluationof
qualificationsto no morethan five. The remainingcontractorsthenprovide a detailedtechnical
andfinancial proposal. Theseproposalsareevaluatedanda contractawardis made. We have
programmed$5.5M in FY06 for 5 projectsthatwill be in the solicitationstagein this fiscal year.
ConstructionInsuection/Oversight:Oncea dealis awarded,MAJCOMs andinstallations
provide supervisionand inspectionoversightof the developer'sconstruction. The Air Forceand
February2005
PageNo.5 09
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
DoD havea vestedinterestin theseprivatizationprojects(loans,loan guarantees,
land leases)
andthe oversightensuresthe Air Forcereceivestop-qualityhousingfor military membersthat
complieswith stateandlocal constructioncodes. AFCEE assiststhe MAJCOMs and eachbase
to provide constructionoversightasthe contractoraccomplisheshousingconstructionor
revitalization. We haveprogrammed$14.91Min FY06 for direct SIOH for the 15 projectsthat
will be in this stageduringthis fiscal yearand $1.1M for AFCEE and Air Staff supportof 14
positions.
Portfolio ManalZement:Long-termproject oversightis keyto ensuringthe Air Forcecontinuesto
receivequality housingfrom the privatizationcontractors.The Air Forcehasselectedan
industryleaderin this field to assistAFCEE's four personnelandthe installationsby providing
on-goingprogramoversightfor the lengthof the initiatives --generally 50 years. In this capacity,
the portfolio manageroverseesthe financial andmanagerialaspectsof the dealto ensureloan
paymentsaremet, escrowand lockbox accountsareestablishedand funded,and management
is
providing quality serviceto our members.This oversightidentifies anyprojectsthat are in
difficulty and implementscorrectivemeasuresto precludeprojectfailure. We haveprogrammed
$5.94M in FY06 to accomplishthis essentialoversight. As the programmaturesandmore
projectsare awardedthis costwill grow as developmentcostsfall.
Base/MAJCOMPOCs: Executinga housingprivatizationinitiative is manpowerintensiveyet
MAJCOMs andbaseshavenot beenallocatedadditionalmanpower.To date,existing staffs
have beenoverburdenedbecauseof the needto continueexistinghousingoperationsworkload
while providing supportto the developmentof the privatizationinitiatives. A centralpoint of
contactis neededat eachinstallationto coordinateall activitiesassociatedwith the privatization
effort from the beginningof conceptdevelopmentthroughconstructionandmoving service
membersand their families into the units. Largeprojectsor joint ventureswith anothermilitary
servicewill requirean additionalpositionto supportthe expectedcoordinationand correlation
workload. Onebase-levelmanpowerpositionis programmedspanningthe time from two years
beforeprojectawarduntil constructioncompletionfor eachprojectunder1,000units andtwo for
anyproject over 1,000units or projectsthat involve morethanone service. Also, one position
has beenprogrammedfor eachof the MAJCOMs until their projectsareawarded.$1.2Mhas
beenprogrammedin FY06 for 40 positions.
February2005
PageNo. 510
I~ g,,-
5
J:
"'~
~
~a:,,"- ",
NN
"-"-
O
mEo
O
a: oa:
E -'~
e Et
"- e ~o w
~ ~ "' z
~~~o
CC
t> Z Z
,", ~ ~
e-,-,
~ww
~>"-~~
J:~~J:~~
EE
U
:J
u
In'",.
~:J~
-c
~ow
wJ:~
J: >- C
~..J:J
u. ~ In
~~g
Z
>w~~
w
C
cccc
"'"'"'"'"'"'
~~~~
EE
NN
~
EoE
z
z
0
00
0
00
00
00"-
0
00"-0 a: 00
~ w
w
~ a: ~
a:
~ 0 ~ ~ 8
"-> o~o>
0"cc
EEEE
EE
~~
z
z
0
00
z z
0
00
00
00
00
0000
0000
C"-
coa:~
~~
0
ZOO
a:a:>oow~
~
w ~ ~~
;:)
;:) ~ w -'
~ a: Z ~ Z z m m -a: <
~ 8 F ~ :J :J iE iE~ 8 ~
~>oo(!)(!);:);:)o>oo
~,,-~~wWJ:J:~"-~~
00
cc
='-
cccc
",",",Q)
~~
~~~~s~~~~~s
ot>
cc---cc
OOCCCoo
'-=
"'"'"'='-
e"'e
1~8§
eeee
~§~§
ee
§§
~~
88
eeee~~eee~~
§~§~88~~§88
"""
~~
~>~
"'~'"
~~~~
~~~'"
~~
~~
~~
""
~~~o~~~~~
"-"-
"-"-"-
,,-,,-,,-,,-,,-,,-,,-,,-,,-,,-,,-I~,,-,,-,,-,,-,,-~,,-
~~~
~~gg
OO~
woooo~
a:
w w~
5 a: a: ~
(!) 8 8 ~
~»o
~"-"-~
cccc
"'"'"'"'
EEEEt>oEEEot>
ee
§§
~
~
~
~
EEEE
~~~~
eeee
~§~§
NNNN"""""""S'"
~
NNNN
~~~~
"-"-"-"-
m
II
.~
-"'
g-g
.-"
"cO ".~ 0 ~
~~o~
CI
~~
w
.S
(II
S
~
~~~g
,, 5'":"":
0
ft
-NCD
"'OOO~N
~
0
J:
~
u:
J:"-"-"-
~s~
o~
~
.~
~-..J
a.~
U"-"-
0000 >
-OI
0000
w
w~
a: a:
-' 8 8 E
=»e
coc c"'="'
~"-
"
$,,-,,-
500
w
~ ~< ~
~ EE
<ee
z00 z ~
OOOO~0
0000.
cc
",Q)
~~"-
N
~~~
~ ~
~~>-
G)
~a:m
~.~~
> ~
J: >
!2 8 E
~>e
a:
W
00-,
~~
>N'"
mO~
>
~
WU",
~OO
~WE
~~~
eee
§I§~
~
"'
oo
a: ~
-x B
ccc
Q)",~
EEE
~ee
§~
~~a
Ozw
"'
~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
!.100-00
~~wz
cc
"'"'
w~
"-"'
J:
~ .c'0~co~~
0 ~ ~I~
E ~I'C
~ ~~
~
5
"'
~8m~~~
Q)CD~O
""~'
~o.o
"!"!"!'":~~
"""Nw",
~oo10
'i'
~~~
"!~o o "
"'~
~.
CD"'..,
-"ai" ~
,-
O ,~O!~
"'N";
~.o~
~~~go
..,'":c.j..;"!
"'0
~,'"
~.~~.
~~~o~~~~~~8N
~~~~
Q)~o
c:i"~~o.o
Q)CDO ..No
O '~"!"!"':::::~-:N"!~"!
...:'":"":"!
No"~'"
'i' ~ 'i'
Co
x
W
~
~~
o~
u~"
"'-
(/)-0
-'0
"'u
'"Q)
0
0
.0
'"
'":
."
'"'
"
~
0
~
Q)
"
'"
'" -"
CD
O:J
'"0
'"
'"
0
0
0
Q)
'"'
~
'"
c:i
'"
0
0
0
CD
'"'
~
'"'
~
'"
Q)
NO...
---Q)
co
f'-
0
0
CD
0
'"
'"'
~
0
~
Q)
~...
N
'"
...
N
0
'"
'"
'"
0
g
<0
0
W
Q)
~"'"
"'..
00';:
--f'"C;:)
C
~
CD
'"
~
CD
.~
'"
"
"
~
~
~
Q)
N
'"
~
0
CD
N
'"
~
~
N
~
w
z
"'"
'"
'"
~--
CD
.
N
N
W
"C
~"'
..'"
> ";:
0
C;:)
-Q)
CD
'"
~
0
0
Q)"
'"
~
,-
...'"
'"
--
N
CD
N
u
N
~
N
ti
,!!.
e
~
-"-
J:
~
-~
~
-"-
.!!
...0
-C
~
-w
~
~
J:
<
(k:
z.,;
I
0
-~
-~
m
".,;
ai
c.,;
,2
I
~
---,
-.,;
J:
~
z
~
ai
"-
;:)
Z
~
o
m
".,;
0
00
(k:
U
00
Z
~
.,;
~
W
~
~.,;
J:
-.U
~
-'
w
-
u
~
J:
~
I
<.9
~
-'
"-
z-"0
iig
.,;
-'
Z
z
-'
I
;:)
""-
u
0
(k:";
w
>
0
C
-
C
-w
tD
-"-.,;
~
~
Z
-~
--~
-~
-tD
N
J:
~
X
~
"-
-m-
tD
"C
,,-".,;~
z(k:
-;:)
~
z
~
~
-'m
(!)-'
Wa:
W
~
;:)
~
;:)
J:
.,;
-'
m
(!)
U
~
~
~
Q)
~
C
-,~..
C
"-0
~>
..."
0
,
0
,
'"
0
,
Co
~
.c
00
0
"-
Q)
U
"'
'"
0
.c
8
.>-
Q)
"-
'"
.0
m
~
.."
C
""
-,
'"
0
'"
0
'"
0
C
-,
-:;
-,
-:;
-,
8
..
OJ
"
<
8
OJ
"
<
'C
~
512
-"---
Z
0
--::>-«z
~
CJ)
u~5
CJ)~~
w~~
-w[!:WI-CJ)oo[!:
Z
0
I-
~CJ)~
u5!!2
g ~~
CJ)
w
0
1.~~~EE33~EE
ew>-eeww>-ee
~OJu.u.u.ZZ~u.u.
--~cc-cc~cooocooc
~~UUU~UU~
~~~222~22~
t=:'eeiOiOiOeiOiOe
,0. 0. ~ C C " C ~"
'E E 0 0 0 eo
0 e
-_uuu_uu-
"'Iv
w
u
~"a
Ozw
LL in
~:;)I-c
:n
w
::>
~
<ow
w:I:"
:I: >- C
>-NNM~-N--'"
Qj~~~~~~~~~
.g>u.u.u.u.u.u.~~u.
"
GI
>
.~ o~
..."'"
~
U
I-u.~
.~ ~E"1"1ggM~~~~
I-
~5~~u;o..-,,?0~
~~
< ~
fu
-J
<
0
:I:
C
~
i.:
...<0
~MOO"'~~<O-
g'
,-
-J
~~
~~
0
"-WCJ)~U
~co
~Z~[!:[!:lt:It:[!:~5
W
~
z
>OZ ~w ZOJ~~
>
~~
!!2«z«w[!:z
[!:~>g~
«~>-co
~««~~
00
05~~~~~~WE
uoo~~~o>-lt:e
001-1-1-1-1-1-u.~u.
~~~~~[!:~
~::>:I:>-o<o
«~001-1-u.1-
---c--c--~ccoc~occc
~~~U~~U~~~
~~~2~~2~~~
ccc~~c
c
~~~~~~
~~~~~~
eeeiOeeiOeee
0. 0.'"
C "'"
c
E E'e
--_u_-
~
0
z
eeeeee
0. ~ 0. 0.
~ n"
0 e'E8
E E e
0.
:55
OJ
Z
~~~~~
ce"
!~~G
'S:i;,;,u
~
««Zo~~~.~~l-
00<
..,.
oooo>:I:~I~~u.o«oo~::>u.
~~~~~~5
It:ooo«oo
1-1-1-1->1-1-
~~EEEEEEEEEEEE
««eeeeeeeeeeee
OJOJu.u.u.u.u.u.u.u.u.u.u.u.
~
~
c~ccc~~
0000000
UUUUUUU
222S222
c-c
o~o
U~U
2~S
E
8008800
e
0.
0.
E e E e E E
G~
ffi~~
..~
W
iOiOiOcoiOiOiO
C C C C ~ C C
uu
uu
w
=8 ~$w
",v,.
--cc~
~~~
~~~
iOe'"
~ 0. C
8
c
c
ffi
~.1:~
eee
"'"
E 0
e'e
_u
---
""""'O-~g~-N
~~~~~>->->-~~
u.u.~u.u.u.u.u.u.u.
"'...'"
~~~~~~
u.u.u.u.u.u.
~
u.
~~"""'"
~~>->-~~~
u.u.u.u.u.u.u.
N"""
~~~
u.u.~
_o-O-~~~.N
MO~O...~O
0
~~<O8~~~
m~MM--"'O~--"'MM
';!~~~~"1~~ro:~
~~ro:~~oo:U:;: ~
0.
E
"""~
~~~
u.u.~
I
u.
Q.
W
It:->-
U~~~
ZU~~
It:
-co
C"g
.2
"
u.~CXJ
0 <0 to
ffi>-~
W
OJ
~
~~<
It:o~o
'-=
.~
~
I--J:;)
I-
It:ZON
oZ
II)
~.,
"'--;9<o"'~'9'9'1"-
-0'::0--;'::9
ro:~U:;:ro:~"!'": ~~~~~~~u:;:~~~~~~
0
~":"I'9~";o,?
"'~"'MOOOOO-OOO'"
~
U
I~
w
.,~~
I
"C
0...
Uoo~'"
0
0
§
~
--~
~
'"
~
-'"
~
m
'"
m
N
~
~
'"N
M.
-~
'"0
"'-
0
...MN_m...
<O"' N-~ '"
(0
~"'.m
>
--'
~
,
co.,"
';0
0
0
<0
0
0
~
0
MoO
'"
"1
...(0
'
N
Q)
0
~
0
0
0
~
0
0
0
~
0
0
Q)
~
~
'"
M
IoU
W
.,
~!J
OO~
"C~
~
(O<OOM
NN-"""~m
(0
Q)
'"
0
ro
'"
~
~
Q)
N
Q)
g
0
'"
-m
'c
'"
Q)
...Q)
N
~
N
'.
<0
Q)
~
~
N
W
"C
~'"
.,..
--~
~~
>~"'0
U
U
.,..:
'-
u
z
-0
~
0
~--'
:;!
.u.=
OJ
g
.!!
-«
~
co
E.
.OJ
[I]
~
~
«
w
--'
!!2
~
~
W
Z
W
[I]
-."
u.
«
:::
0
u
00
OJ
u.
«
..~u."
~rn««e
«~O--,G
ffi
~
oow~~u:!
::>~~01-:I:
I-~~ZW
:;!~w>-~
~:l:100
~
I-
~
>
~
«
«
U-
~
rn
ai
.
~
~.
~
c
0
~
rn
..;
.U
u.
u.
u.
«
0
u.
..:
0
[I]
u.
«
~
G
[!:
«
W
~
U
[!:
<
u.
[!:
0
:I:
U
U
~
!!2
>
..:
[!:
I-
~
Z
W
0
Z
«
~
00
~
[!:
«
OJ
~
rn
--
>
.,
10
0
~
00
""
..~
'~OO
10
'"
'"
0
..!.
~
00
'"
'"
'"
(0
(0
<0
U
0
0
Z
.,
0
0«
0..:
0.
«..:
9>
0
00000
,).c.c.c.c
(0
~
0-
>.
~
~
,
,?
a:
513
---
O~
'eE~
11: I-
wZ
a: mO
wC/)Z~
~~~~~
z
Z
~
J:
~
>->-w~W
~U
-~~~11:~0c/)
.=~J:11:
>~J:c/)1-
~
."uOO
>
~
~
C/)
'
O z~O
E E E E E
I.e~~eeeee
~.J~u.u.u.u.u.
EEEEo:EE
...,.,.,0.,.,
EEEE'UEE
~ ~~~~2~~
,:: eeee~ee
1-0
11:11:
:)~C/)
~~~5
=~w~
oJ:z.JI-~~1-
<~w~owwo
:):)1-
c/)c/)o
J:1-1-~1-u.u.I-O~~
Eo:EEo:
E
EEEEEEEE
EEE
EE
~~~~~~~~
eeeeeeee
~~~
eee
~~
ee
.,.2.,."g.,
EUEEo
0
EE
~~~~~~w~
~~~~~~~~
~~
~~
u.
U
::)
u.u.u.u.u.u.u.u.
~~~~~g~~gg~~~~
eeeee~~e~~eeee
~w~
~~~
~~
w
~"'~"'
~~~~~~~~~~~a~~
u.u.u.
u.u.
u.u.u.u.u.u.u.u.u.u.u.~u.u.
~~~~
.,.,
EE
~~
ee
u.u.
"
>
m
Ozw
11.-""
In'"
~::)I-c
<ow
~
IV
.~
-w
w:I:O
:I: >- C
I--J::)
g-g
.-"
-;
<0 (D
1-11.0
.-0
~
-..~
~ ~ ~w~~"'~a
,"E~~~-"'.O
N -u.
);-
0".0
'.o-i::'~
...~~~...
~~"'
~
'
", "-;-'
", '
w~~"'~o~---",
w
.J
§~
~
~
~ ~:;;!
EEEEEo:o:EO:o:EEEE
.,.,
.,.,.,.,."g,g."g,g.,.,.,.,
EE
EEEEEooEooEEEE
m
00
11:1-
~ § ~I~ § § § § § § ~ ~ § §I~ ~ §I~ 8 81~8 8 §:~I~~
"""
a~~oa
C
~ooo
11:1-1-1-
-~
§
~
e
~u.u.~~
~«
I- I- W
~::i>-
~oo~o~~oOww
-J
~~
.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,
EEEEEEEE
~g~~~
e~ee~
.,.,.,
EEE
~
E
~~~~~~~~
Z>-N
w
-JI1:I1:~~~O
-J-J-J
Z -Jc/)~
Uffi" E O»m
I1:~~~~~~oooz~11:
:)~
C/)C/)OOO~~~
m C/) C) u. ' .mOw
w ~ ~ z U .J m
~w
J:
~
0
J:J:J:z~~
d~--I1:~"O
~
o:w
~
~
E E E E
W
-10
11.~
"0
w
~~~
u.u.m
~ ~ ~
C/)u.u.u.u.
>-"'~~~~~~
~aaaaaaa
GO
~
>-"000"0
'"
C/)~~~~~
-~omwwm
> -J -J Z ~ I- I- m
J:eeee
I-
~oa
~zz~
0
w
-J
$:
-J
-J
§I~ ~ ~ 8 ~I~ I~8 ~ ~ 8
..~
~
0 .-11:
1-.!211:
EU:)
..-guzz
~~~~~~~g
~
~
g~~gm""~~
~~~
a.-.
~~~
_0-
~re
m",
~om~~~~~a~ ~
~"!",mww"'~"',,:m
-i
mc;c;-'ddlrid
odd
.om
":""Iric;-id.oIri-i",m"'W-'
'"
,.,,_.
-."',
g 18"'~
wa
",!-
Ww
""
~~
""
,~"',"'_"'--",~~.",~
~-g~
~ .,
.-U
0
:I:
I~
W
~
u:
..-
"0
~~...
0:;:o~
g'"=
~
'"=
0
~
0
'"~
~'"~
0""
0
0""
~
...a
~m
~0
'"0""
N
N
~
...,
~
0
~
0
0
~m
~...
0
ffi
~
~
0w
~
w
...,
~
'"
'"
~
...,
"'...
..>- ~
~
g
~
~
M
...,
~O:"".
-::>
0
--~
"!
~
..0...,
~""'"
~
d
wU
W
..
~
~~
0:
~::>
~,-
_0:
"'.
w
0)
~
N
w
0
~
",ww~~om
'"
,aa-a",to
0
w"".-~~.N
...
~
~
"".,;
W
"0
NO)""
~
~
0
~
~
M
~
o)~~G..O
"""~-m"'t')
~'"
-~"""N
-~
...~
0
~..;
a
U
w
m
0
U
~
U
'5~
5
~
=
S
'"
.:
~
u
-C/)
E
~
~
0
Z
~
-J
m
~
$:
~
J:
~
~
m
~
z
~
0
-J
6
J:
~
«
~
~
z
0
~
~
>
«
8
m~
z
g
11:
W
~
a-
0
-0
~
N
~
0
~
~
U
11:
0
u.
Q;
«
~
~
~~
~
~
~
U
-~
J:
~
~
C/)~
N
-~_m~~~~_~~
mu. -mmmO-;.
~~~~~~~e
~gl1:~~~~o
m-J~~~6~u
~~C/)OSoz~
30w:)~z~«
'00~~~~>~
uO
11:
u.
"
~
~
~
«
~
~
m
0
11:
W
I'-
E
~
~
~
~
~
I-
:)
..
~
0
0:
W
~
co
>.
m
0
,~
~
a
~
...,...,
0
0
woo'"
0
~
~
~
.J..J..J.
"""
W
,
OJ
OJ
«
W
,
C)
"
«
W
0
"
0.
~
~
OJ
"..
W
a
c
u
~
~
0
'
>~
""
>
'.,
a-
514
I-~
(/)
e~
..0
"'u
u
~
.~
~
~.~
c
,§~
~~:I~\::: 515
"..
-e
a.
!
..to
>-
w
U
W
::>
It: ~ a
Ozw
u.UjIt:
w:I:
:I:>-c
I-=~
v
.c
ft
u.~(.Q
0<0
I- u.
Z>-N
WIt:It:
0
~«I- W
It:~>-
I-
<~-I
a.~<
W
C
';
:;=
It: ::> I-
:;ow
"0
~
GI
.~
U
(/)
u:
-'"
C
0
"0
c
:;= ~
:s o~
:;=
~
"'"
.-~
e- ~
Q:
~5
.-U
c
~
..<
~
0
:I:
;c:
W
CI"OE
"O~
u"''"
OOh
W
..
'"~fJ.c
"O=»
~
W
..>'fJ
"0
> c
~
=»
.
iLL
"O..
c
"0=
c
...>
u
'"
...~..
~
'",w
.§
j
-'"
".
-~E",xc
Ii
..
'""0
~.-'"
1S
a.e
--.,
'"
E
-~
~
cwC
.,-'"
(!)~E°ti
-ffil~l~
~ s
.3aa..,1S
"0 z m ~ ."
C~,"o.c
'"-.,
~
"'.!!-"8
CC-c"
~,,~,".c
.,
10
0
-"Ec~~
"we>E
'"
.:
C :c
"'0-0
'".,
°mmmm~
-
C
0
.."""'C
~
.-=NNNN-
~
Do
"~'s!a",
U
~
<~NM"'.
This Page Intentionally
Left Blank
516
i
i
DEBT PAYMENTS
:
i
i
!
J
1
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET REQUEST
DEBT PAYMENT
Program (in Thousands)
FY 2006Program$1
FY 2005Program$38
Purpose and ScoQe
The Debt Paymentprogramcontinuesin nameonly, asthe lastof the Capehartand Wherry
mortgageswere liquidatedin FY 89. This programcoverspaymentof Servicemen'sMortgage
InsurancePremiumsto the FederalHousingAdministration(FHA) for mortgagesassumedby
active military personnelprior to FY 1980.
The HousingAct of 1954,Section124,Public Law 560, 83rd Congress,Servicemen's
Mortgage
InsurancePremiums,aided in providing homesfor membersof the Armed Forcesof the United
Statesand their families with FHA mortgageinsurance.To be eligible for the benefit,members
hadto be on active duty and owntheproperty. This programwas discontinuedthroughPublic
Law 93-130(Military ConstructionAppropriationAct, 1980),which allowedcoverageonly on
mortgagesexisting prior to FY1980. As membershaveretired or sold the houses,the amount
neededto continuefundingpremiumson thosemortgageshascontinuedto slowly decreaseamd
is adjustedfor inflation.
Therehasbeenno paymentto the FHA sinceAugust2002, whenthe Air Forcereimbursedthe
FHA for 2 policies. Consequentlythe fundingprogramwasreducedto a nominal amountin
FY05, retaining only enoughfundingto supportthe two members.The programfor FY 2006 is
alsoa nominal amount,asfollows:
Fiscal Year
2006
2005
February2005
Number
2
2
Avera!!e Pavment/Yr
$.5
$.5
Amount ($000)
$1
$1
PageNo. 517
I
This Page Intentionally
Left Blank
518
FOREIGN CURRENCY
EXCHANGE DATA
..c."...~~.
m~~
W
1O000)0-q-NIO0~
1'-0NNOO('o~~
C~CD(V)~NI'-I'-(v)N
~...,.-Ct"i~N-~N""'-~
.C0)0 .in
U).~...
..-Q)
=> ~
'-.-
W
<
0
0
<
N
~
=>
LL.GO
OZW
u.-~
~U)..of"
-=>'-""'<OW:I:I/)
:I: 1ft
C
W
G
Z
~
U
:I:>-§
w:x
u.~CD
0<0
UO
z.c
.-0
Z
W
'-::!m
W
N,.,C
~
~ < <
W
~:J><~-J
~
~
(V) M
~ .".
,
>
-C
u
(,O-q-O-q-1'-1O1O1'0)~00)(v)1O~~
-C~
O)(V)O)(V)ONO)IO
~CI/)r--.:~'o;I";~~~
,.-~
OCUQ)I'-~IOI'-~
0)0
c"iU
N
CDQ.U~
~
~
Q.
<W
><
>-~
u.
>~
XC
~
~ .".g-C
~ 0
ffi
W"'"
-q- -q10
~ ~
0)01'-0~0CX)-q-0)
CDO)~N~~NNCD
.-~O)~~o)CDI'-cx)~
C
0)0
LL. .-.C
~ .".
U)'~
=> -.'-
:J~>
.".g-C
~
~8
<
W
C
U
U)
W
~
-0
0
N
iL
~
~
.-CD
~
--~
~CX) CX)
~
N(v)NCDCD
~
~
~
-q- ~
Q)
U
z
~
Q.
~
~
(V) 0)
~
~
.".
(,O-q-O-q-1'-1O1O1'o)~Oo)NIO~~
-CQ)
O)(V)O)(V)ONO)IO
Q) g' I/) r--.: ~ '0;1";~ ~
~cu$I'-~IOI'-N
c
Q.U~
CU
q-- ~
0)0
N
~
(,0~
Q.><
<W
>-
u
-Q)
~t:
C
Q)
Q)I-
"0
CeCC~CCU§
-JU~UJ>-~O>-.Jc..
0
~
e
~
Q) e
E
E
0
~
~I-ro
~
~
0
C
Q)
g
.:
ro"C
0
E
0
()
Q)~
g
C
I-
.-
>.o~
roQ)
E
0
0.
o.croroJ::Q)"Coro~0)-~2cu
I0. c:
~
0
ro
0
C
.-0
>.
~
uOUJ-,Z(J)(J)'-=>,-
I~
~
.-C
0
519
This Page Intentionally
Left Blank
520