The Recent Growth in Banks’ Commercial Property Exposures Box B Graph B1

advertisement

Box B

The Recent Growth in Banks’ Commercial

Property Exposures

Growth in commercial property lending has picked up in recent years, while demand for business credit outside of the property sector has remained more moderate (Graph B1). Indeed, commercial property exposures, which constitute around one-quarter of the stock of business credit outstanding, have accounted for around two-fifths of the growth in business credit over the past two years.

1 Commercial property lending comprises loans provided to businesses for the development, acquisition or improvement of property, where repayment is dependent on the subsequent proceeds from sale or the rental income generated from these, or other, properties. Because downturns in commercial property markets have triggered a number of past episodes of financial instability (both domestically and overseas), growth in banks’ commercial property exposures warrants particular attention.

The growth in commercial property lending over recent years has been driven by the major banks and by a strong increase in lending from local

Asian-owned banks (Graph  B2). The major banks pulled back from commercial property lending after the market turned down during the financial crisis, but since 2012 they have steadily grown their commercial property exposures by more than

5 per cent a year. The local Asian-owned banks have increased their exposures particularly quickly over this period, albeit from a low base, growing by a bit less than 20 per cent a year. This has accompanied an increase in residential development activity

1 These figures are broad estimates given the compositional differences between the business credit and commercial property exposures series. Business credit data include the on-balance sheet claims on banks’ and non-bank financial institutions’ domestic books, whereas commercial property exposures include both the on-balance sheet and credit-equivalent off-balance sheet exposures of banks’ consolidated Australian operations.

%

30

20

10

0

-10

Graph B1

Business Credit Growth

Six-month-ended, annualised, non-seasonally adjusted

%

Growth by component

Total

Other business credit

-20

2005 2010

Sources: APRA; RBA

$b

200

2015 2010

Graph B2

Commercial Property Exposures

Banks’ consolidated operations

Non-major banks by ownership

All banks*

2015

-20

$b

40

Australian

150 30

Major banks*

Other foreign

European

100 20

50

0

2005 2010 2015

* Excludes overseas exposures

** Includes HSBC

Sources: APRA; RBA

30

20

10

0

-10

Asian**

2005 2010

%

Commercial property exposures

30

20

10

0

-10

10

2015

0 in Australia, by both domestic and foreign firms, particularly in the inner-city apartment markets of

Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane. Liaison suggests that local Asian-owned banks have a prominent role in funding many foreign developers. Asian investment in existing commercial property assets in

30 RESERVE BANK OF AUSTRALIA

Australia has also increased strongly in recent years.

The increase in lending by local Asian-owned banks has not, however, been confined to the commercial property sector; they have increased their Australian activities more broadly over recent years, consistent with growing trade and financial linkages between

Australia and the Asian region.

In contrast, the commercial property lending of the non-major Australian and European-owned banks has remained relatively subdued in recent years, after these banks reduced their exposures sharply after the 2009 property market downturn. This pullback followed a very sharp run-up in their exposures prior to the financial crisis, and was likely a reaction to the high impairment rates experienced on their commercial loan portfolios and, in the case of some

European banks, to difficulties in home markets

(Graph  B3). This experience highlights that banks’ commercial property lending can be very procyclical, contributing to the build-up of risks during property market upswings and aggravating the fallout during subsequent downswings.

%

18

12

6

0

2005

Major banks

2010 2015

* Includes overseas exposures

Sources: APRA; RBA

2005

Office

2010 2015

0

Graph B4

Commercial Property Exposures by Category

Banks’ consolidated Australian operations

$b $b

50

Office

Residential

25

40

Graph B3

Commercial Property Impairment Rates

Banks’ consolidated Australian operations

By bank By category

Other

Australianowned banks*

Foreignowned banks*

Retail

%

Land development

Retail

Residential

18

12

Industrial

6

20

Although commercial property exposures increased significantly across all loan categories in the leadup to the financial crisis, before levelling out or declining, the timing of the post-crisis recovery has varied (Graph  B4). Exposures for many segments have been rising steadily for a number of years, and office and retail exposures have now surpassed their pre-crisis peaks. The growth in office property lending has been driven by strong investor demand for these properties as well as a pick-up in office building construction.

The post-crisis decline in residential and land development exposures was larger and more prolonged than for other categories, as banks tightened lending standards for property development after recording significant loan losses during the crisis. As a result, the pick-up in lending for residential and land development has been more recent, and sharper, than for other categories, driven

30

20

10

Other

Industrial

0

2005 2010

Sources: APRA; RBA

2015

Land development

15

10

5

Tourism & leisure

2005 2010 2015

0 by increased housing development activity across the major east coast cities. Among the banks, Asianowned banks have expanded their residential and land development lending rapidly over the past five years or so, while strong growth in the major banks’ exposures began much more recently. While the recent growth in residential and land development exposures has been strong, increases in exposure limits – the total value of banks’ lending facilities extended to borrowers – have been even more rapid. The resulting growth in undrawn facilities – the difference between exposure limits and actual

FINANCIAL STABILITY REVIEW | OC TOBER 2015 31

exposures, largely reflecting construction loans that will be drawn down over the life of the construction project – points to further increases in exposures in the near term (Graph  B5). Given the current risks of oversupply in some inner-city markets – discussed in the ‘Household and Business Finances’ chapter

– banks will need to remain vigilant in assessing the risks  surrounding property development loans to ensure that this lending is prudent and appropriately covered by both capital and provisions.

R

Graph B5

Commercial Property Exposures and Limits

$b

Banks’ consolidated Australian operations

$b $b $b

30

Exposure limits

30 30 30

20 20 20

10 10

Actual exposures

20

10

Undrawn facility

10

0

2007 2011

Sources: APRA; RBA

0

2015

0

2007 2011 2015

0

32 RESERVE BANK OF AUSTRALIA

Download