A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume... 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina
advertisement
A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 010 304 308 310 320 324 326 328 340 346 347 348 350 351 354 357 358 360 362 364 372 374 380 384 388 390 392 394 396 400 403 406 PK K 6 PK 9 PK PK K K K 9 6 PK PK K PK 9 PK K PK PK PK K 9 6 K 6 9 9 6 6 ALAMANCE-BURLINGTON ALEXANDER WILSON ALTAMAHAW OSSIPEE BROADVIEW MID E M YODER ELEM EASTERN ALAMANCE HS EASTLAWN ELEM EDWIN M HOLT ELEM ELON COLLEGE ELEM B EVERETT JORDAN ELEM GARRETT ELEM GRAHAM HS GRAHAM MID GROVE PARK ELEM HARVEY R NEWLIN ELEM HAW RIVER ELEM HILLCREST ELEM HUGH M CUMMINGS HS MARVIN B SMITH ELEM NORTH GRAHAM ELEM PLEASANT GROVE ELEM R HOMER ANDREWS ELEM SOUTH GRAHAM ELEM SOUTH MEBANE ELEM SOUTHERN HS SOUTHERN MID SYLVAN ELEM TURRENTINE MID WALTER M WILLIAMS HS WESTERN ALAMANCE HS WESTERN MID WOODLAWN MID 5 5 8 5 12 5 5 5 5 5 12 8 5 5 5 5 12 5 5 5 5 5 5 12 8 5 8 12 12 8 8 Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes 85.2 77.2 63.1 85.6 64.4 67.8 81.7 83.5 81.8 83.0 48.9 66.8 76.9 66.7 58.6 75.9 46.0 83.2 71.7 74.5 70.7 77.2 81.4 60.8 80.0 76.0 81.5 68.9 63.5 85.3 84.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst MI Exm NR Exp Dst NR Exp Exm Dst Exm Dst Dst NR Exm Dst NR NR Exp NR NR Exp Exp Exm Dst Exm Exm Exp Exm Exm Dst NR Exp Dst NR Dst NR Exp NR Exp Dst Exm Dst 01A LAKESIDE SCHOOL 000 LAKESIDE SCH 6 12 No No 26.1 ~ LP 01B RIVER MILL 000 RIVER MILL CHARTER K 12 Yes No 66.3 ~ Exp 020 302 304 306 10 12 K 6 7 9 No Yes No No No No 61.5 85.5 71.9 3 ~ ~ NR Exp Dst NR ALEXANDER COUNTY ALEXANDER CENTRAL HS BETHLEHEM ELEM EAST JUNIOR HS Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 1 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 020 308 316 320 324 328 330 332 ALEXANDER COUNTY ELLENDALE ELEM HIDDENITE ELEM STONY POINT ELEM SUGAR LOAF ELEM TAYLORSVILLE ELEM WEST JUNIOR HS WITTENBURG ELEM K K K K PK 7 K 6 6 6 6 6 9 6 Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No 87.8 77.5 76.2 78.9 65.3 78.7 79.3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst Exp NR Exp NR NR NR 030 304 308 316 320 ALLEGHANY COUNTY ALLEGHANY HS GLADE CREEK ELEM PINEY CREEK ELEM SPARTA ELEM 9 K K PK 12 8 8 8 No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No 68.9 91.0 91.9 82.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exm Exc Exm Exc Exp Dst 040 306 308 309 311 316 324 328 330 ANSON COUNTY ANSON HS ANSONVILLE ELEM ANSON MID CENTRAL ELEM LILESVILLE ELEM MORVEN ELEM PEACHLAND-POLKTON WADESBORO ELEM 9 PK 7 K K PK K 4 12 6 8 3 6 6 6 6 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 48.0 73.2 70.1 48.9 60.7 61.8 74.0 61.1 * ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 050 302 305 310 316 330 348 ASHE COUNTY ASHE COUNTY HS ASHE COUNTY MID BLUE RIDGE ELEM FLEETWOOD ELEM MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEM WEST JEFFERSON ELEM 9 7 PK PK PK PK 12 8 6 6 6 6 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes 71.8 86.9 83.2 91.5 85.9 88.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp Dst Exp Dst Exm Exc Exp Dst Exm Dst 060 302 304 308 310 316 318 322 328 332 AVERY COUNTY AVERY COUNTY HS BANNER ELK ELEM BEECH MOUNTAIN ELEM CRANBERRY MID CROSSNORE ELEM AVERY MID FREEDOM TRAIL ELEM NEWLAND ELEM RIVERSIDE ELEM 9 PK K 6 PK 6 PK PK PK 12 5 8 8 5 8 5 5 5 No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes 69.0 92.7 85.7 82.2 91.3 91.1 88.9 92.7 85.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exm Exc Dst NR Exp Dst Exp Exc Dst NR Exp Dst Exp Exc Exm Dst Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 2 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 06A GRANDFATHER ACAD 000 GRANDFATHER ACAD K 12 No No 34.1 ~ LP 06B CROSSNORE ACAD 000 CROSSNORE ACAD K 12 No No 39.7 ~ LP 070 308 312 316 325 326 327 302 328 330 338 339 340 342 BEAUFORT COUNTY BATH ELEM BEAUFORT CO ELEM BELHAVEN ELEM CHOCOWINITY MID CHOCOWINITY PRI JOHN C TAYLOE ELEM EASTERN ELEM JOHN SMALL ELEM NORTHSIDE HS P S JONES MID SOUTHSIDE HS S W SNOWDEN ELEM WASHINGTON HS K PK 2 5 PK 2 PK 4 9 6 9 PK 9 8 5 8 8 4 3 1 5 12 8 12 8 12 No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No 81.6 83.3 73.5 76.5 78.9 79.5 75.1 66.1 73.9 51.9 61.0 57.9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dst NR Dst NR NR NR Exp Exm Exm NR NR NR NR NR Exp 080 304 310 312 320 336 348 356 360 362 BERTIE COUNTY ASKEWVILLE ELEM SOUTHWESTERN MID BERTIE HS C G WHITE MID JOHN P LAW ELEM AULANDER ELEM WEST BERTIE ELEM COLERAIN ELEM WINDSOR ELEM PK 6 9 6 PK PK K PK K 5 8 12 8 5 5 5 5 5 No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes 77.5 60.4 37.2 49.7 77.1 52.7 73.8 65.8 61.9 ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR NR LP NR Exm MI Exm Exp NR Exm 090 304 312 316 317 318 320 324 328 330 333 BLADEN COUNTY B T WASHINGTON PRI BLADEN MID BLADENBORO HS BLADENBORO PRI BLADEN LAKES PRI CLARKTON SCH OF DISC DUBLIN ELEM EAST ARCADIA ELEM EAST BLADEN HS ELIZABETHTOWN PRI PK 6 9 PK PK 6 PK PK 9 PK 5 8 12 5 5 8 8 8 12 5 Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes 60.3 65.3 54.6 74.6 68.2 79.1 76.4 64.4 49.5 64.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp NR Exp Exp NR Exp NR NR Exp Exm Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 3 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 090 352 360 364 BLADEN COUNTY PLAIN VIEW PRI SPAULDING-MONROE MID TAR HEEL MID-HS PK 5 6 8 6 12 No No No No No No 65.5 74.7 57.1 ~ ~ ~ NR NR NR 100 302 320 304 316 326 332 334 335 336 338 340 342 344 348 BRUNSWICK COUNTY BELVILLE ELEM LINCOLN PRI BOLIVIA ELEM LELAND MID NORTH BRUNSWICK HS SHALLOTTE MID SOUTH BRUNSWICK HS SOUTH BRUNSWICK MID SOUTHPORT ELEM SUPPLY ELEM UNION ELEM V WILLIAMSON ELEM WACCAMAW ELEM WEST BRUNSWICK HS 3 PK K 6 9 5 9 6 PK PK PK PK K 9 5 2 5 8 12 8 12 8 5 5 4 5 8 12 Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No Yes No 75.2 83.9 76.3 53.5 80.4 61.1 82.8 84.5 80.3 74.4 75.6 83.2 61.3 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exm Exp Dst NR NR Dst NR NR Dst NR Dst NR Exp Dst Exp NR Exm Dst NR 110 304 306 308 318 320 324 326 332 336 338 340 342 348 352 356 366 368 370 372 376 379 380 381 384 388 401 BUNCOMBE COUNTY A C REYNOLDS HS A C REYNOLDS MID BARNARDSVILLE ELEM BLACK MOUNTAIN ELEM BLACK MOUNTAIN PRI CANDLER ELEM CANE CREEK MID CHARLES C BELL ELEM CHARLES D OWEN HS CHARLES D OWEN MID CLYDE A ERWIN HS CLYDE A ERWIN MID EMMA ELEM ENKA HS FAIRVIEW ELEM GLEN ARDEN ELEM HAW CREEK ELEM HOMINY VALLEY ELEM JOHNSTON ELEM LEICESTER ELEM NORTH BUNCOMBE ELEM NORTH BUNCOMBE HS N BUNCOMBE MID OAKLEY ELEM PISGAH ELEM ENKA MID 9 6 K 4 K K 6 K 9 6 9 6 K 9 PK K K K PK K PK 9 6 K K 6 12 8 5 5 3 5 8 6 12 8 12 8 5 12 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 12 8 5 5 8 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No 80.3 88.7 76.7 80.3 82.4 90.7 91.8 85.3 71.1 85.5 68.9 82.4 81.7 73.6 87.4 97.4 90.3 85.5 80.8 85.5 88.7 72.7 87.9 82.7 90.0 81.9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Dst Exp Dst NR Exm Dst Exp Dst Exm Exc Exm Exc Exp Dst NR Exp Dst NR Dst NR Exp Dst NR Exp Dst Exm Exc Exm Exc Dst NR Exp Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst NR Exm Dst Dst NR Exm Exc Dst NR Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 4 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 110 408 410 412 416 420 422 428 432 436 444 BUNCOMBE COUNTY SAND HILL-VENABLE AVERY'S CREEK ELEM W D WILLIAMS ELEM T C ROBERSON HS VALLEY SPRINGS MID WILLIAM W ESTES ELEM WEAVERVILLE ELEM WEAVERVILLE PRI WEST BUNCOMBE ELEM WOODFIN ELEM PK K PK 9 6 K 2 K K K 5 5 5 12 8 5 5 1 5 5 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No 80.7 90.3 83.4 79.6 89.2 87.8 87.7 111 302 304 306 312 332 348 356 360 ASHEVILLE CITY ASHEVILLE HS HALL FLETCHER ELEM ISAAC DICKSON ELEM CLAXTON ELEM IRA B JONES PRI WILLIAM RANDOLPH ELEM ASHEVILLE MID VANCE ELEM 9 12 K 5 K 5 K 5 K 3 4 5 6 8 K 5 Yes No Yes No Yes No No No 11A EVERGREEN CMTY CHTR 000 EVERGREEN CMTY CHTR K 8 11K F DELANY NEW SCH 000 F DELANY NEW SCH K 120 304 314 315 316 318 320 324 330 312 334 338 340 344 350 356 360 364 K 9 6 K 9 K PK 3 K 6 K K K 6 PK K K BURKE COUNTY CHESTERFIELD ELEM EAST BURKE HS EAST BURKE MID FOREST HILL ELEM FREEDOM HS GEORGE HILDEBRAN GLEN ALPINE ELEM HALLYBURTON ELEM DREXEL PRI HERITAGE MID HILDEBRAN ELEM HILLCREST ELEM ICARD ELEM LIBERTY MID MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEM MULL ELEM OAK HILL ELEM Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status 86.4 84.3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ Dst NR Exm Exc Exm Dst Exp Exm Dst Exm Dst Exp Dst Exp Exp Dst Dst NR No No Yes No No No No No 64.2 72.1 79.5 79.2 79.2 68.4 81.4 75.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp NR Exm NR Exp NR Dst NR NR No No 76.1 ~ NR 7 Yes Yes 85.4 ~ Exm Dst 5 12 8 5 12 5 5 5 2 8 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes No 76.3 74.6 85.0 90.9 74.2 85.7 73.8 88.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp Dst NR Exm Exc Exp Exp Dst NR Exm Dst Exm Dst NR NR NR Dst NR Dst NR Exp Dst Exm Dst NR 89.5 79.8 77.2 80.2 85.4 86.8 84.6 79.2 Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 5 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 120 368 372 374 376 380 386 BURKE COUNTY RAY CHILDERS ELEM RUTHERFORD COL ELEM SALEM ELEM TABLE ROCK MID VALDESE ELEM W A YOUNG ELEM PK PK K 6 K PK 5 5 5 8 5 5 No No No No No No No No No No No No 130 304 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 322 323 324 326 327 328 329 330 334 336 338 340 342 344 CABARRUS COUNTY A T ALLEN ELEM BETHEL ELEM BEVERLY HILLS ELEM CENTRAL CABARRUS HS COLTRANE-WEBB ELEM HARRISBURG ELEM CONCORD MID CONCORD HS J N FRIES MID MT PLEASANT ELEM MT PLEASANT MID MT PLEASANT HS N W CABARRUS HS N W CABARRUS MID ROYAL OAKS ELEM ROCKY RIVER ELEM R B MCALLISTER ELEM SCH FOR ENVIR STUDY W R ODELL ELEM WEDDINGTON HILLS ELEM WINECOFF ELEM W M IRVIN ELEM WOLF MEADOW ELEM K K PK 9 PK K 6 9 6 K 6 9 9 6 K K K 4 K K PK K K 5 5 5 12 5 5 8 12 8 5 8 12 12 8 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 132 304 308 312 328 330 332 336 KANNAPOLIS CITY A L BROWN HS FOREST PARK ELEM FRED L WILSON ELEM JACKSON PARK ELEM KANNAPOLIS MID SHADY BROOK ELEM WOODROW WILSON ELEM 9 12 K 5 K 5 K 5 6 8 K 5 K 5 140 304 308 312 316 CALDWELL COUNTY BATON ELEM COLLETTSVILLE ELEM DAVENPORT ELEM DUDLEY SHOALS ELEM K K K K 5 8 5 5 Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status 80.6 94.3 83.3 81.4 88.6 80.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dst NR Dst NR Dst NR Dst NR Dst NR Dst NR No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No 85.9 75.1 82.2 73.0 71.4 86.3 79.9 67.2 85.2 75.2 71.4 71.4 77.4 90.6 75.4 80.1 84.1 78.8 81.8 82.4 82.3 67.2 86.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dst NR NR Exp Dst Exp Exm Dst NR Exp NR Exp Dst Exp Exp NR Exp Exm Exc NR Exp Dst Exp Dst Exp Exp Dst Exp Dst Exp Dst NR Exp Dst No Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No No 57.9 80.4 77.2 78.3 73.2 70.2 78.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exm Dst NR NR Exp NR Exp Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No 90.8 87.3 90.3 84.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Exc Dst NR Exm Exc Exp Dst Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 6 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 140 324 332 336 340 344 348 352 356 360 368 372 376 384 386 388 390 392 396 CALDWELL COUNTY GAMEWELL ELEM GAMEWELL MID GRANITE FALLS MID GRANITE FALLS ELEM HAPPY VALLEY ELEM HIBRITEN HS HUDSON ELEM HUDSON MID KINGS CREEK ELEM WILLIAM LENOIR MID LOWER CREEK ELEM OAK HILL ELEM SAWMILLS ELEM SOUTH CALDWELL HS VALMEAD ELEM WEST CALDWELL HS WEST LENOIR ELEM WHITNEL FOUR SEASONS K 6 6 K K 9 K 6 K 6 K K K 9 K 9 K PK 5 8 8 5 8 12 5 8 8 8 5 8 5 12 5 12 5 5 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes 80.8 70.0 86.5 89.0 85.1 65.2 83.7 87.2 78.2 83.0 85.6 78.7 84.4 66.5 79.4 59.9 67.6 82.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst NR Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst NR Dst NR Exp Dst Exp Dst NR Dst NR Exp Exm Dst NR NR NR NR Exm Dst 150 304 308 312 CAMDEN COUNTY CAMDEN COUNTY HS GRANDY PRI CAMDEN MID 9 12 PK 4 5 8 Yes No Yes Yes No No 70.3 75.3 89.1 ~ ~ ~ Exm MI NR Exp Dst 160 304 306 308 310 311 313 314 316 317 318 322 324 332 344 352 CARTERET COUNTY ATLANTIC ELEM BOGUE SOUND ELEM BEAUFORT ELEM BEAUFORT MID BROAD CREEK MID EAST CARTERET HS CROATAN HS HARKERS ISLAND ELEM MOREHEAD CITY ELEM MOREHEAD CITY MID MOREHEAD CITY PRI NEWPORT ELEM SMYRNA ELEM WEST CARTERET HS WHITE OAK ELEM PK PK PK 6 6 9 9 K 4 6 PK K PK 9 K 8 5 5 8 8 12 12 8 5 8 3 5 8 12 5 No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes 94.4 91.6 81.6 69.7 86.5 63.2 71.8 90.0 88.3 85.8 86.8 87.9 81.6 74.0 88.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dst NR Exp Exc Dst NR NR Dst NR Exp Exp Exp Exc Exm Dst Dst NR Exm Dst Exp Dst Exm Dst Exp Exm Dst 9 12 Yes No 46.0 ~ Exp 16A CAPE LOOKOUT HS 000 CAPE LOOKOUT HS Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 7 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 16B TILLER SCH 000 TILLER SCH K 6 Yes Yes 87.8 ~ Exm Dst 170 316 334 338 339 342 344 CASWELL COUNTY BARTLETT YANCEY HS NORTH ELEM N L DILLARD JR HS OAKWOOD ELEM SOUTH ELEM STONEY CREEK ELEM 9 PK 7 PK PK K 12 6 8 6 6 6 Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No 51.0 63.6 73.9 76.0 71.7 85.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp NR NR Exp NR Exp Dst 180 302 304 308 312 316 320 324 326 332 336 340 342 344 348 352 356 360 364 368 372 376 380 384 388 CATAWBA COUNTY HARRY M ARNDT MID BALLS CREEK ELEM BANDYS HS BANOAK ELEM BLACKBURN ELEM BUNKER HILL HS CATAWBA INTERMEDIATE CHARLES H TUTTLE MID CLAREMONT ELEM CLYDE CAMPBELL ELEM FRED T FOARD HS JACOBS FORK MID MAIDEN ELEM MAIDEN HS MILL CREEK MID MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEM OXFORD ELEM RIVER BEND MID SHERRILLS FORD ELEM ST STEPHENS ELEM ST STEPHENS HS STARTOWN ELEM SWEETWATER ELEM WEBB A MURRAY ELEM 7 K 9 K K 9 6 6 PK K 9 7 K 9 7 K K 7 K K 9 PK K K 8 5 12 6 6 12 6 8 5 6 12 8 5 12 8 6 5 8 5 6 12 6 6 6 Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No 89.8 79.8 63.9 76.4 85.4 58.1 77.2 79.4 75.8 89.6 74.2 90.0 82.0 65.7 85.5 87.5 72.2 78.6 75.9 82.2 72.3 84.0 64.5 82.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst NR NR NR Exp Dst NR Exm Exm Exp Exm Dst NR Exp Exc Exp Dst NR Dst NR Exm Dst Exp Exp NR Exp Dst Exp Exp Dst NR Exp Dst 181 312 316 322 326 332 336 HICKORY CITY NORTHVIEW MID GRANDVIEW MID HICKORY HS W M JENKINS ELEM LONGVIEW ELEM OAKWOOD ELEM 6 6 9 PK PK PK 8 8 12 5 5 5 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No 78.7 73.8 70.9 89.5 61.4 79.8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR NR Exp Exm Dst Exp Exp Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 8 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 181 HICKORY CITY 342 SOUTHWEST ELEM 344 VIEWMONT ELEM K 5 PK 5 No Yes No Yes 62.6 81.5 ~ ~ NR Exm Dst 182 316 321 322 324 328 9 12 6 8 K 5 K 5 K 5 Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes 73.3 84.7 86.7 74.4 79.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst NR Exm Dst NR Exm 18B ENGELMANN ART/SCI 000 ENGELMANN ART/SCI K 6 Yes Yes 64.0 ~ Exm 190 304 308 312 316 328 332 336 340 341 342 346 348 350 352 K K 5 9 5 K 9 PK PK 9 K K K PK 8 8 8 12 8 8 12 8 8 12 8 4 4 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No 90.5 85.3 77.9 70.6 74.0 79.4 66.1 64.2 88.1 66.2 88.6 75.6 59.6 86.8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Exc Exm Dst Exm Exp NR Exm Exp Exm Exm Dst Exp Exp Dst NR NR Dst NR 19A CHATHAM CHARTER 000 CHATHAM CHARTER K 8 No No 73.2 ~ NR 19B WOODS CHARTER 000 WOODS CHARTER 4 12 Yes Yes 81.8 ~ Exm Dst 200 304 308 310 312 316 320 324 PK 9 6 PK PK PK PK Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No 87.1 80.1 90.8 74.3 87.4 94.7 88.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Dst Dst NR Dst NR Exp Exp Dst Exp Exc Exp Dst NEWTON-CONOVER CITY NEWTON-CONOVER HS NEWTON-CONOVER MID SHUFORD ELEM SOUTH NEWTON ELEM THORNTON ELEM CHATHAM COUNTY BENNETT ELEM BONLEE ELEM CHATHAM MID CHATHAM CENTRAL HS HORTON MID J S WATERS ELEM JORDAN MATTHEWS HS MONCURE ELEM NORTH CHATHAM ELEM NORTHWOOD HS PERRY W HARRISON ELEM PITTSBORO ELEM SILER CITY ELEM SILK HOPE ELEM CHEROKEE COUNTY ANDREWS ELEM ANDREWS HS ANDREWS MID HIWASSEE DAM UNION MARBLE ELEM MARTINS CREEK ELEM MURPHY ELEM 5 12 8 12 5 8 5 Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 9 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 200 328 330 332 336 9 6 PK PK 12 8 5 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes 80.0 90.5 93.2 92.8 ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Dst Exm Exc Exp Exc Exm Exc 20A THE LEARNING CTR 000 THE LEARNING CTR K 8 No No 77.1 ~ NR 210 304 306 312 316 EDENTON/CHOWAN CHOWAN MID D F WALKER ELEM JOHN A HOLMES HS WHITE OAK ELEM 6 PK 9 PK 8 5 12 5 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No 77.4 62.3 65.0 76.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm NR Exp Exp 220 308 310 312 CLAY COUNTY HAYESVILLE ELEM HAYESVILLE HS HAYESVILLE MID PK 4 9 12 5 8 Yes Yes No Yes No No 83.2 78.1 89.0 ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst MI Exp Dst NR 230 308 312 316 320 324 328 336 340 364 368 370 376 CLEVELAND COUNTY BOILING SPRINGS ELEM BURNS HS BURNS MID CASAR ELEM SCH ARTS CREST SENIOR HS CREST MID SCH TECH ELIZABETH ELEM FALLSTON ELEM SPRINGMORE ELEM TOWNSHIP THREE ELEM UNION ELEM WASHINGTON MATH/SCI K 9 6 K 9 6 K PK K PK PK K 5 12 8 5 12 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No 90.5 63.5 76.9 79.2 71.0 83.3 90.4 79.2 86.6 75.4 72.7 75.3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exc Exp NR Exp Exp Exp Dst Exm Exc Exm Exp Dst Exp Exp Exp 231 304 316 320 324 325 328 336 KINGS MOUNTAIN BETHWARE ELEM EAST ELEM GROVER ELEM KINGS MOUNTAIN HS KINGS MOUNTAIN MID NORTH ELEM WEST ELEM PK K PK 9 6 PK K 5 5 5 12 8 5 5 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No 83.3 94.5 85.7 67.3 85.7 83.5 90.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Dst Exm Exc Exm Dst NR Exp Dst Exm Dst Exp Exc CHEROKEE COUNTY MURPHY HS MURPHY MID PEACHTREE ELEM RANGER ELEM Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 10 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 232 308 310 313 316 328 332 SHELBY CITY GRAHAM ELEM JAMES LOVE ELEM JEFFERSON ELEM MARION INTERMEDIATE SHELBY MID SHELBY HS PK PK PK 4 6 9 3 3 3 5 8 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes 62.3 71.4 72.5 66.4 75.8 70.3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Exm Exp Exp Exp Exm 240 304 308 318 328 330 332 334 344 348 352 354 356 370 371 372 376 380 388 COLUMBUS COUNTY ACME DELCO MID ACME DELCO ELEM BOYS & GIRLS HOME CERRO GORDO ELEM CHADBOURN MID CHADBOURN ELEM EAST COLUMBUS HS EVERGREEN ELEM FAIR BLUFF ELEM GUIDEWAY ELEM HALLSBORO-ARTESIA HALLSBORO MID OLD DOCK ELEM SOUTH COLUMBUS HS TABOR CITY ELEM TABOR CITY MID WEST COLUMBUS HS WILLIAMS TOWNSHIP 6 PK 3 K 5 PK 9 K PK K K 5 K 9 PK 6 9 K 8 5 8 8 8 4 12 8 8 8 4 8 8 12 5 8 12 8 No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No 61.5 75.0 27.0 70.2 63.7 71.7 48.8 74.8 68.2 63.2 69.2 64.2 68.2 59.9 70.0 64.8 50.5 75.8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp LP NR NR NR NR Exp NR NR NR NR Exp Exp Exm NR NR NR 241 304 308 320 316 WHITEVILLE CITY CENTRAL MID EDGEWOOD ELEM WHITEVILLE PRI WHITEVILLE HS 6 3 PK 9 8 5 2 12 No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No 78.5 73.8 60.4 ~ ~ 1 ~ NR Exm Exm NR 250 304 306 308 312 320 324 328 332 336 CRAVEN COUNTY ALBERT H BANGERT BEN D QUINN ELEM BRIDGETON ELEM BRINSON MEMORIAL VANCEBORO-FARM LIFE GROVER C FIELDS MID GRAHAM A BARDEN ELEM H J MACDONALD MID HAVELOCK ELEM K PK K K PK 6 K 6 K 5 5 5 5 5 8 5 8 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes 82.1 79.7 78.5 90.8 76.3 77.9 77.0 82.9 85.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Dst Exp Exp Exm Exc Exp Exp Exp Exp Dst Exm Dst Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 11 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 250 340 344 348 350 356 360 362 364 368 372 376 378 380 CRAVEN COUNTY HAVELOCK HS HAVELOCK MID J T BARBER ELEM JAMES W SMITH ELEM NEW BERN HS OAKS ROAD ELEM ROGER R BELL ELEM TRENT PARK ELEM TUCKER CREEK MID WEST CRAVEN HS WEST CRAVEN MID W JESSE GURGANUS ARTHUR W EDWARDS 9 6 PK K 9 K K K 6 9 6 K PK 12 8 5 5 12 5 5 5 8 12 8 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes 69.5 78.8 84.2 72.2 66.1 70.2 79.6 79.5 88.6 68.4 77.4 80.6 86.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Exp Exp Dst Exp NR NR NR Exp Exm Dst Exp NR Dst NR Exm Dst 260 306 308 363 310 312 316 318 320 321 322 324 325 326 332 336 338 340 342 344 348 352 356 358 359 361 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 CUMBERLAND COUNTY ARMSTRONG ELEM ASHLEY ELEM GLENDALE ACRES ELEM LOYD E AUMAN ELEM BEAVER DAM ELEM LILLIAN BLACK ELEM JACK BRITT HIGH BRENTWOOD ELEM DOUGLAS BYRD MID DOUGLAS BYRD HS YOUNG HOWARD ELEM CAPE FEAR HS ELIZ CASHWELL ELEM EASTOVER CENTRAL ANNE CHESNUTT MID CLIFFDALE ELEM COLLEGE LAKES ELEM C WAYNE COLLIER ELEM J W COON ELEM CUMBERLAND MILLS CUMBERLAND ROAD ELEM DISTRICT NO 7 ELEM LUTHER JERALDS MID E E SMITH HS FERGUSON-EASLEY ELEM GRAY'S CREEK ELEM R MAX ABBOTT MID HOWARD L HALL ELEM BILL HEFNER ELEM HOPE MILLS MID JOHN GRIFFIN MID ED V BALDWIN ELEM IRELAND DRIVE MID PK 3 K K PK K 9 PK 6 9 PK 9 PK PK 6 PK K PK PK PK PK PK 6 9 PK K 6 K K 6 6 PK 6 5 5 2 5 5 5 12 5 8 12 5 12 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 12 5 5 8 5 5 8 8 5 8 No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No No 71.0 86.9 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp Dst Exp Exp Dst NR Exm Exp Exp NR Exp NR Exp Exp Exm Exc Exp Dst Exp Exp Dst NR Exp NR Exp Exm Exc NR Exm Exp NR Exm Dst Exp Exm Exc Exp Dst Exp Dst Exp NR 77.0 82.1 62.7 69.6 78.7 71.0 59.0 58.3 66.1 69.7 94.5 82.1 77.5 80.4 79.9 71.2 71.1 58.9 90.1 63.3 45.0 66.4 78.2 85.8 75.9 90.7 85.8 83.7 77.3 70.0 Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 12 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 260 372 373 380 412 382 383 386 388 396 397 398 400 401 402 384 404 405 406 407 408 410 411 414 415 416 418 424 425 426 427 428 430 432 440 444 446 448 302 450 452 454 455 456 459 6 K 2 K PK 6 K 9 K K PK PK K 1 K PK PK 6 K 9 K 6 PK K PK 6 9 6 PK 9 6 3 PK PK PK 9 2 K PK PK 6 9 PK K 8 5 5 1 5 8 5 12 5 5 5 5 5 5 K 5 5 8 5 12 5 11 5 5 5 8 12 8 5 12 8 5 2 5 5 12 5 1 5 5 8 12 5 5 No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No 75.0 81.4 91.0 6 8 No No CUMBERLAND COUNTY LEWIS CHAPEL MID GALLBERRY FARMS ELEM LONG HILL ELEM RALEIGH ROAD ELEM LUCILE SOUDERS ELEM MAC WILLIAMS MID MARGARET WILLIS ELEM MASSEY HILL CLASSICAL MARY MCARTHUR ELEM E M HONEYCUTT ELEM E E MILLER ELEM MONTCLAIR ELEM MORGANTON ROAD ELEM MANCHESTER ELEM MAE R WILLAMS KIND WILLIAM H OWEN ELEM PAULINE JONES ELEM PINE FOREST MID LAKE RIM ELEM PINE FOREST HS PONDEROSA ELEM REID ROSS CLASSICAL BENJAMIN J MARTIN ROCKFISH ELEM J W SEABROOK ELEM 71ST CLASSICAL MID SEVENTY-FIRST HS SOUTH VIEW MID SHERWOOD PARK ELEM SOUTH VIEW HS SPRING LAKE MID STEDMAN ELEM STEDMAN PRI SUNNYSIDE ELEM TERESA BERRIEN ELEM TERRY SANFORD HS VANSTORY HILLS ELEM ALMA O EASOM ELEM WARRENWOOD ELEM WESTAREA ELEM WESTOVER MID WESTOVER HS ALGER B WILKINS ELEM WILLIAM T BROWN ELEM 26B ALPHA ACADEMY 000 ALHPA ACADEMY Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status 68.9 67.2 71.2 49.3 70.0 78.1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Dst NR Exm Exc Exm Exp Dst NR NR Exp Exp Dst Exp Dst NR NR Exp Exp Exp Exm NR NR Exp Dst NR NR Exp Dst Exp Dst Exm Exc NR Exm Exc Exp NR NR NR NR Exm Dst Exm NR Exm NR Exm Exc Exm NR Exm NR Exp NR NR 52.7 ~ NR 73.6 82.9 62.3 73.0 81.3 85.1 75.9 68.2 76.9 66.4 72.6 47.9 78.5 81.5 52.5 76.9 82.7 82.3 91.3 75.4 96.7 55.4 74.0 78.2 56.3 66.3 84.4 63.4 66.0 68.5 90.3 Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 13 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 270 304 306 308 310 312 316 320 CURRITUCK COUNTY CENTRAL ELEM CURRITUCK COUNTY HS CURRITUCK CO MID THE J P KNAPP SCH KNOTTS ISLAND ELEM MOYOCK ELEM W T GRIGGS ELEM K 6 9 12 7 8 K 6 K 6 K 6 K 6 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No 88.4 73.4 86.5 88.4 93.4 92.1 87.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst Exm Exp Dst Exp Dst Exp Exc Exm Exc Exp Dst 280 302 304 308 312 316 320 324 328 DARE COUNTY CAPE HATTERAS ELEM CAPE HATTERAS SECOND KITTY HAWK ELEM MANTEO ELEM MANTEO HS MANTEO MID FIRST FLIGHT ELEM FIRST FLIGHT MID K 6 K PK 9 6 PK 6 5 12 5 5 12 8 5 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes 81.3 73.6 89.0 85.0 76.0 87.8 81.7 90.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Dst Exp Exp Dst Exm Dst Exp Exp Dst Exp Dst Exm Exc MI 290 306 308 309 312 316 320 322 324 328 332 334 336 344 348 350 352 356 364 365 366 367 376 380 384 388 DAVIDSON COUNTY NORTHWEST ELEM CENTRAL DAVIDSON HS CENTRAL DAVIDSON MID CHURCHLAND ELEM DAVIS-TOWNSEND ELEM DENTON ELEM E LAWSON BROWN MID EAST DAVIDSON HS FAIR GROVE ELEM HASTY ELEM LEDFORD MID LEDFORD SENIOR HS MIDWAY ELEM NORTH DAVIDSON SR HS NORTH DAVIDSON MID PILOT ELEM REEDS ELEM SILVER VALLEY ELEM SOUTH DAVIDSON HS SOUTHWOOD ELEM SOUTH DAVIDSON MID TYRO MID WALLBURG ELEM WELCOME ELEM WEST DAVIDSON HS K 9 6 K PK PK 6 9 PK K 6 9 K 9 6 PK K PK 9 K 6 6 K PK 9 5 12 8 5 5 5 8 12 5 5 8 12 5 12 8 5 5 5 12 5 8 8 5 5 12 Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No 89.2 57.4 80.3 74.7 84.2 81.5 83.8 62.1 75.5 85.6 87.9 70.1 86.0 73.0 89.7 89.1 85.0 84.0 59.9 82.9 75.8 84.2 88.0 79.5 64.9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Dst NR Dst NR Exp Exp Dst Exm Dst Dst NR NR Exp Exp Dst Dst NR NR Dst NR NR Exm Dst Dst NR Dst NR Dst NR NR Exp Dst NR Dst NR Dst NR Exp Exp Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 14 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 291 308 332 336 340 348 352 LEXINGTON CITY CHARLES ENGLAND INT LEXINGTON MID LEXINGTON SR HS PICKETT PRI S LEXINGTON/DEV WING SOUTHWEST ELEM 4 6 9 K PK K 5 8 12 3 3 3 No No No No No Yes No No No No No No 69.6 60.8 51.6 63.3 57.7 75.8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR NR NR NR NR Exp 292 316 318 320 324 THOMASVILLE CITY LIBERTY DRIVE ELEM THOMASVILLE PRI THOMASVILLE MID THOMASVILLE HS 3 PK 6 9 5 2 8 12 No No No Yes No No No Yes 62.1 66.1 66.6 ~ 1 ~ ~ NR NR NR Exm 300 308 310 312 320 325 326 328 330 336 DAVIE COUNTY COOLEEMEE ELEM CORNATZER ELEM DAVIE COUNTY HS MOCKSVILLE ELEM NORTH DAVIE MID PINEBROOK ELEM SHADY GROVE ELEM SOUTH DAVIE MID WILLIAM R DAVIE ELEM K 5 K 5 9 12 K 5 6 8 K 5 K 5 6 8 K 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No 73.1 76.8 69.6 80.5 88.9 82.4 93.2 79.9 76.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exp Exp Exp Dst Exm Dst Exp Dst Exm Exc NR Exp 310 304 308 324 330 336 340 344 352 356 360 364 384 388 392 396 DUPLIN COUNTY B F GRADY ELEM BEULAVILLE ELEM CHARITY MID CHINQUAPIN ELEM WARSAW ELEM E E SMITH MID EAST DUPLIN HS JAMES KENAN HS KENANSVILLE ELEM NORTH DUPLIN ELEM NORTH DUPLIN JR SR ROSE HILL-MAGNOLIA WALLACE ELEM WALLACE-ROSE HILL HS WARSAW MID PK PK 6 PK PK 6 9 9 PK PK 7 PK PK 9 6 No No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 81.2 82.2 72.7 83.1 60.5 77.2 62.9 50.0 80.7 84.8 75.2 75.4 83.3 55.8 59.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dst NR Dst NR NR Dst NR NR NR NR NR Dst NR Exp Dst NR Exp Exp Dst Exp NR 8 8 8 8 5 8 12 12 5 6 12 5 5 12 8 Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 15 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 320 304 306 308 310 312 313 314 315 316 318 320 323 324 325 327 328 332 338 339 340 344 346 347 348 352 354 355 356 360 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 370 372 374 388 400 K 6 K K 9 K 6 K 6 K PK 6 K 9 K K K 6 K K K 6 K K K PK 6 9 K K K K 9 6 K 9 6 K PK PK PK 5 8 5 5 12 5 8 5 8 5 5 12 5 12 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 8 5 4 5 5 8 12 5 5 5 5 12 8 5 12 7 5 5 5 5 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No 64.8 73.4 65.4 57.2 75.0 91.9 56.0 83.0 77.6 77.7 60.5 77.2 85.6 43.5 78.1 76.1 76.0 84.2 73.8 83.6 66.8 68.3 57.5 80.0 73.4 80.0 64.3 62.2 73.2 79.8 63.5 83.3 68.6 67.1 72.3 44.5 74.1 75.1 53.5 59.3 53.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp Exp Exp Exm Exp Exc NR Exp Dst NR Exp Exp Exp Exm Dst Exp Exm Exm Exp Exp Dst Exm Exp Dst Exp NR NR Exp Dst Exp Exp Dst NR Exp Exp Exp Exp Exp Dst Exp NR Exp LP Exm Exm NR Exp NR K 5 Yes Yes 60.3 ~ Exm MI DURHAM COUNTY BETHESDA ELEM BROGDEN MID BURTON ELEM EASTWAY ELEM C E JORDAN HS EASLEY ELEM CHEWNING MID ENO VALLEY ELEM G CARRINGTON MID CLUB BLVD ELEM GLENN ELEM DURHAM SCH OF ARTS HILLANDALE ELEM HILLSIDE HS HOPE VALLEY ELEM HOLT ELEM FOREST VIEW ELEM JAMES E SHEPARD MID LAKEWOOD ELEM LITTLE RIVER ELEM FAYETTEVILLE ST ELEM LOWE'S GROVE MID GEORGE WATTS ELEM MANGUM ELEM MERRICK-MOORE ELEM MOREHEAD MONTESSORI NEAL MID NORTHERN HS OAK GROVE ELEM PARKWOOD ELEM E K POWE ELEM PEARSONTOWN ELEM RIVERSIDE HS SHERWOOD GITHENS MID R N HARRIS ELEM SOUTHERN HS ROGERS-HERR MID SOUTHWEST ELEM C C SPAULDING ELEM W G PEARSON ELEM Y E SMITH ELEM 32A MAUREEN JOY CHARTER 000 MAUREEN JOY CHARTER Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 16 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 32B HEALTHY START ACAD 000 HEALTHY START ACAD K 4 No No 43.9 * NR 32C CARTER COMMUNITY 000 CARTER COMMUNITY K 9 No No 31.5 ~ LP 32D KESTREL HEIGHTS SCH 000 KESTREL HEIGHTS SCH 6 10 Yes No 71.6 ~ Exp 32E TURNING POINT ACAD 000 TURNING POINT ACAD K 8 No No 35.9 ~ LP 32G OMUTEKO GWAMAZIIMA 000 OMUTEKO GWAMAZIIMA K 12 No No 30.5 ~ LP 32H RESEARCH TRI CHTR 000 RESEARCH TRI CHTR K 4 No No 49.1 * NR 32I SUCCESS ACAD 000 SUCCESS ACAD 7 12 No No 6.0 ~ LP 330 304 308 312 324 328 330 332 334 336 340 348 350 354 358 PK PK PK 6 9 4 4 PK PK 5 4 9 PK 9 3 4 3 8 12 5 8 4 5 8 8 12 3 12 Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes 76.4 60.9 56.2 54.8 48.7 68.6 57.8 65.1 50.0 60.9 68.5 57.2 60.2 59.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm NR NR NR Exp Exm NR NR NR NR NR NR Exp Exm K 5 No No 51.6 ~ NR EDGECOMBE COUNTY G W BULLUCK ELEM G W CARVER ELEM COKER-WIMBERLY MAG C B MARTIN MID N EDGECOMBE MAGNET PATTILLO ELEM PHILLIPS MAGNET PRINCEVILLE MONTES ROBERSON ELEM S EDGECOMBE MID W EDGECOMBE MID SW EDGECOMBE HS STOCKS ELEM TARBORO HS 340 FORSYTH COUNTY 308 ASHLEY ELEM Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 17 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 340 312 314 320 330 334 348 350 351 354 360 364 368 376 382 384 390 392 396 400 403 406 416 420 424 428 430 432 440 442 448 452 453 454 460 462 464 472 476 480 486 490 492 494 496 504 508 512 516 520 6 PK K 9 K K 6 PK PK PK 9 PK PK 9 K PK 6 6 K K 6 PK 6 PK K PK K K 6 K 6 K 9 9 PK 6 K PK 6 9 PK 6 K 9 K K K 6 PK FORSYTH COUNTY ATKINS MID BOLTON ELEM BRUNSON ELEM CARVER HS CASH ELEM CLEMMONS ELEM CLEMMONS MID COOK ELEM THE DOWNTOWN SCH DIGGS ELEM EAST FORSYTH HS EASTON ELEM FOREST PARK ELEM R B GLENN HS GRIFFITH ELEM HALL-WOODWARD ELEM HANES MID HILL MID IBRAHAM ELEM JEFFERSON ELEM JEFFERSON MID KERNERSVILLE ELEM KERNERSVILLE MID KIMBERLEY PARK ELEM KONNOAK ELEM LATHAM ELEM LEWISVILLE ELEM MEADOWLARK ELEM MEADOWLARK MID MINERAL SPRINGS ELEM MINERAL SPRINGS MID MOORE ELEM MOUNT TABOR HS NORTH FORSYTH HS NORTH HILLS ELEM NORTHWEST MID OLD RICHMOND ELEM OLD TOWN ELEM PAISLEY MID PARKLAND HS PETREE ELEM PHILO MID PINEY GROVE ELEM REYNOLDS HS RURAL HALL ELEM SEDGE GARDEN ELEM SHERWOOD FOREST ELEM SOUTHEAST MID SOUTH FORK ELEM 8 5 5 12 5 5 8 5 5 5 12 5 5 12 5 5 8 8 5 5 8 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 8 5 8 5 12 12 5 8 5 5 8 12 5 8 5 12 5 5 5 8 5 Growth Expected Exemplary No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Performance Composite 55.7 73.0 83.0 43.7 81.8 93.7 85.8 44.7 87.0 67.1 66.8 66.3 52.1 60.0 74.6 65.0 70.0 55.7 58.3 94.4 94.0 80.4 81.9 54.3 72.3 65.5 85.7 85.3 88.3 72.2 60.1 87.6 71.9 67.1 47.1 83.2 76.6 65.4 68.2 51.0 53.1 60.7 83.5 72.4 77.4 81.8 93.0 79.3 66.5 Spec. Cond. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 18 Status NR NR Exp Dst Exp Exp Dst Exm Exc Dst NR NR Exp Dst Exp Exp NR Exp Exp Exp NR NR NR NR Exm Exc Exm Exc Exm Dst Dst NR Exp Exp Exp Dst NR Dst NR Exp Dst Exm NR Exm Dst Exp Exp NR Exm Dst Exp NR NR Exp Exm NR Exp Dst Exm Exp Exp Dst Exm Exc NR NR A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 340 528 530 532 536 540 544 548 556 560 564 K K K K PK 6 K 9 PK 6 FORSYTH COUNTY SOUTHWEST ELEM SPEAS ELEM UNION CROSS ELEM VIENNA ELEM WALKERTOWN ELEM WALKERTOWN MID WARD ELEM WEST FORSYTH HS WHITAKER ELEM WILEY MID 5 5 5 5 5 8 5 12 5 8 Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No 93.4 72.1 80.7 88.8 78.5 74.7 73.8 76.5 90.3 77.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exc NR Exm Dst Exm Dst Exp NR NR Exp Exm Exc NR 34A LIFT ACAD 000 LIFT ACAD 6 12 No No 7.5 ~ LP 34B QUALITY EDUC ACAD 000 QUALITY EDUC ACAD 6 8 Yes No 57.0 ~ Exp 34C DOWNTOWN MID 000 DOWNTOWN MID 6 8 No No 79.5 ~ NR 34D WOODSON SCH OF CHAL 000 WOODSON SCH OF CHAL K 9 No No 42.6 * NR 34F FORSYTH ACAD 000 FORSYTH ACAD K 5 No No 63.5 ~ NR 350 304 308 310 312 316 318 321 330 332 336 338 340 PK 9 6 6 PK PK 9 PK PK 9 6 PK 5 12 8 8 5 5 12 5 5 12 8 5 No Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 75.1 64.9 78.9 69.2 70.3 59.1 55.6 68.3 63.5 58.6 66.1 82.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp NR NR NR NR Exp NR NR Exp NR Dst NR K 5 Yes Yes 81.2 ~ Exm Dst FRANKLIN COUNTY BUNN ELEM BUNN HS BUNN MID CEDAR CREEK MID EDWARD BEST ELEM FRANKLINTON ELEM FRANKLINTON HS LAUREL MILL ELEM LOUISBURG ELEM LOUISBURG HS TERRELL LANE MID YOUNGSVILLE ELEM 360 GASTON COUNTY 308 ARLINGTON ELEM Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 19 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 360 310 320 324 332 338 336 340 344 348 352 360 364 376 380 390 396 400 408 418 426 428 430 431 432 499 436 438 440 448 456 460 464 468 470 478 480 482 484 488 490 492 494 498 500 504 510 514 520 526 9 K 6 3 PK 9 K PK K K 9 K K 6 9 9 K 6 9 6 9 PK 6 3 K 6 PK K K 6 PK K K 9 K K K PK K K PK 9 6 6 K K 6 PK 6 GASTON COUNTY ASHBROOK HS BELMONT CENTRAL ELEM BELMONT MID BESSEMER CENTRAL BESSEMER CITY PRI BESSEMER CITY HS BROOKSIDE ELEM CARR ELEM CATAWBA HEIGHTS ELEM CHAPEL GROVE ELEM CHERRYVILLE SR HS CHERRYVILLE ELEM COSTNER ELEM CRAMERTON MID EAST GASTON HS FORESTVIEW HS GARDNER PARK ELEM W P GRIER MID HIGHLAND SCH OF TECH HOLBROOK MID HUNTER HUSS HS J B PAGE ELEM JOHN CHAVIS MID KISER ELEM SPRINGFIELD PRI BESSEMER CITY MID LINGERFELDT ELEM LOWELL ELEM MCADENVILLE ELEM MOUNT HOLLY MID FOREST HEIGHTS ELEM NEW HOPE ELEM NORTH BELMONT ELEM NORTH GASTON HS PINEWOOD ELEM PLEASANT RIDGE ELEM IDA RANKIN ELEM RHYNE ELEM ROBINSON ELEM SHERWOOD ELEM HERSHAL H BEAM ELEM SOUTH POINT HS SOUTHWEST MID STANLEY MID TRYON ELEM W A BESS ELEM W C FRIDAY MID WOODHILL ELEM YORK CHESTER MID 12 5 8 5 2 12 5 5 5 5 12 5 5 8 12 12 5 8 10 8 12 5 8 5 2 8 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 12 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 12 8 8 5 5 8 5 8 Growth Expected Exemplary Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No Performance Composite 69.0 88.8 85.9 72.4 63.4 82.8 71.6 85.2 76.9 67.8 78.3 78.4 88.9 66.6 73.0 85.7 74.3 84.1 82.8 54.0 83.3 77.6 81.1 74.0 66.6 86.2 77.6 71.8 60.7 88.2 84.1 58.8 83.7 63.9 89.7 59.5 96.7 81.7 79.4 71.2 68.5 79.7 74.1 93.2 75.3 53.0 60.5 Spec. Cond. ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 20 Status Exp Exp Dst Exp Dst NR NR Exp Exm Dst NR Exp Dst NR NR NR NR Dst NR Exm Exm Exp Dst NR Dst NR Dst NR Exp Exp Dst NR Dst NR NR NR NR Dst NR NR NR NR Exp Dst Exp Dst Exp Exp Dst NR Exm Dst NR Exm Exc Exm Dst Exm Exp NR NR NR Exm Exc NR Exp NR A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 36B PIEDMONT COMMUNITY 000 PIEDMONT COMMUNITY K 5 No No 59.9 ~ NR 370 304 308 312 316 324 GATES COUNTY BUCKLAND ELEM CENTRAL MID GATES COUNTY SR HS GATESVILLE ELEM T S COOPER ELEM PK 6 9 PK PK 5 8 12 5 5 No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes 76.2 82.3 64.9 89.0 78.3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp Dst Exm Dst NR Exm 380 306 308 310 GRAHAM COUNTY ROBBINSVILLE ELEM ROBBINSVILLE HS ROBBINSVILLE MID PK 6 9 12 7 8 No Yes Yes No No No 79.5 78.1 89.0 ~ ~ ~ NR Exp Exp Dst 390 309 311 312 364 316 320 324 332 334 336 352 360 368 GRANVILLE COUNTY BUTNER-STEM MID BUTNER-STEM ELEM C G CREDLE ELEM WEST OXFORD ELEM CREEDMOOR ELEM G C HAWLEY MID J F WEBB HS MARY POTTER INT NORTHERN GRANVILLE JOE TOLER-OAK HILL SOUTH GRANVILLE HS STOVALL-SHAW ELEM WILTON ELEM 5 PK 2 PK PK 5 9 4 7 PK 9 PK PK 8 4 3 1 4 8 12 6 8 6 12 6 4 No No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No 78.0 71.2 66.5 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR NR NR NR Dst NR Dst NR Exp NR Exm Exp NR Dst NR NR 400 308 312 332 321 GREENE COUNTY GREENE CENTRAL HS GREENE COUNTY MID WEST GREENE ELEM SNOW HILL PRI 9 6 3 PK 12 8 5 2 No No Yes Yes No No No No 56.2 69.1 70.6 ~ ~ ~ 1 NR NR Exp Exp 410 304 307 310 313 316 GUILFORD COUNTY ALAMANCE ELEM EDWIN A ALDERMAN ALLEN JAY ELEM ALLEN JAY MID ALLEN MID K K PK 6 6 5 5 5 8 8 Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No 86.6 66.5 60.7 77.0 69.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst Exp NR NR Exp 80.3 83.9 69.5 66.0 74.3 67.0 66.9 83.6 75.6 Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 21 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 410 319 322 325 328 331 334 337 340 343 346 349 355 358 361 364 367 370 373 376 382 388 391 394 397 400 403 406 409 412 415 418 421 423 424 427 430 436 437 439 442 448 451 454 460 463 466 469 472 478 9 K 6 K K PK K K K K K 9 9 K PK 6 K PK K PK PK 6 9 3 K PK 9 PK K 6 K 6 K PK K K K 6 PK 6 6 PK K 6 6 K PK K PK GUILFORD COUNTY T WINGATE ANDREWS HS ARCHER ELEM AYCOCK MID BESSEMER ELEM BLUFORD ELEM BRIGHTWOOD ELEM BROOKS GLOBAL MONTICELLO-BROWN SUMM CLAXTON ELEM COLFAX ELEM CEASAR CONE ELEM DUDLEY HS EASTERN GUILFORD HS ERWIN OPEN ELEM FAIRVIEW ELEM FERNDALE MID FLORENCE ELEM JULIUS I FOUST ELEM CYRUS P FRAZIER ELEM GIBSONVILLE ELEM GENERAL GREENE ELEM ALFRED J GRIFFIN MID GRIMSLEY HS GUILFORD MID GUILFORD PRI W M HAMPTON ELEM HIGH PT CENTRAL HS HUNTER ELEM IRVING PARK ELEM JACKSON MID JAMESTOWN ELEM JAMESTOWN MID JEFFERSON ELEM JESSE WHARTON ELEM JOHNSON STREET ELEM DAVID D JONES ELEM JAMES Y JOYNER ELEM KERNODLE MID KIRKMAN PARK ELEM KISER MID LINCOLN MID JOHN VAN LINDLEY MADISON ELEM EASTERN MID MENDENHALL MID MILLIS ROAD ELEM MONTLIEU AVE ELEM MOREHEAD ELEM MURPHEY TRAD ACAD 12 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 12 12 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 8 12 8 2 5 12 5 5 8 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 8 5 8 8 5 5 8 8 5 5 5 5 Growth Expected Exemplary No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No Performance Composite 56.4 71.6 74.3 60.9 87.5 66.3 93.8 83.0 68.4 88.7 74.7 38.4 56.4 64.2 51.6 65.6 91.0 52.7 72.1 80.8 82.7 62.8 80.4 86.3 53.4 56.7 75.3 71.2 56.6 80.6 79.5 90.2 74.7 70.1 82.0 79.1 93.2 60.8 85.4 58.3 75.3 80.5 76.7 77.2 84.3 68.5 84.7 80.9 Spec. Cond. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 22 Status NR Exp Exp NR Dst NR NR Exm Exc Exp Dst Exp Exp Dst Exp Exp Exp Exp NR NR Exm Exc NR NR Exp Dst Exp Dst NR Exm Dst MI Exp Dst Exp NR Exp Exm Exm NR Exm Dst NR Exm Exc Exp NR Exp Dst Exp Exm Exc NR Dst NR NR Exm Exm Dst NR NR Exp Dst Exp Exp Dst Exp Dst A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 410 481 484 487 490 493 496 499 502 505 508 511 514 517 522 523 529 532 535 538 541 544 547 550 553 556 559 562 565 568 571 574 445 577 580 583 586 592 595 598 K 9 6 9 6 K PK K K 9 PK K K K K 9 PK K K K 9 9 6 K 9 K 9 6 K K 2 K PK PK K PK 6 9 K 5 12 8 12 8 5 5 5 5 12 5 5 5 5 5 12 5 5 5 5 12 12 8 5 12 5 12 8 5 5 5 1 5 5 5 5 8 12 5 Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No 83.7 57.9 78.7 84.4 92.7 72.0 54.5 87.9 81.6 72.2 66.7 63.2 61.5 90.8 83.1 67.3 59.9 75.2 75.3 85.0 40.6 68.1 82.0 80.5 63.5 84.7 70.3 85.1 78.7 89.4 93.6 41A IMANI INSTITUTE 000 IMANI INSTITUTE 6 8 No 41B GREENSBORO ACAD 000 GREENSBORO ACAD K 5 No GUILFORD COUNTY NATHANAEL GREENE NORTHEAST HS NORTHEAST MID NORTHWEST HS NORTHWEST MID NORTHWOOD ELEM OAK HILL ELEM OAK RIDGE ELEM OAK VIEW ELEM PAGE HS PARKVIEW VILLAGE ELEM CLARA J PECK ELEM PEELER OPEN ELEM PILOT ELEM PLEASANT GARDEN ELEM LUCY RAGSDALE HS RANKIN ELEM SEDALIA ELEM SEDGEFIELD ELEM SHADYBROOK ELEM BEN L SMITH HS SOUTHEAST HS SOUTHEAST MID SOUTHERN ELEM SOUTHERN HS SOUTHWEST ELEM SOUTHWEST HS SOUTHWEST MID STERNBERGER ELEM STOKESDALE ELEM SUMMERFIELD ELEM LAUGHLIN PRI SUMNER ELEM UNION HILL ELEM VANDALIA ELEM WASHINGTON ELEM LAURIN WELBORN MID WESTERN HS C WILEY ACCEL/ENRICH Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status 58.8 71.1 60.4 58.2 69.1 73.1 60.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Dst Exp NR Exm Dst Dst NR Exm NR Exm Dst Exp Dst Exp NR NR Exm Exm Exc Dst NR Exp NR Exp Exm Exp Dst Exp Exp Exp Dst Exp Dst Exm Exp Dst NR Dst NR Exm Exp Dst Exm Exc Exm NR Exm NR NR NR Exp NR No 53.0 ~ NR No 82.3 ~ Dst NR Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 23 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 41D PHOENIX ACAD INC 000 PHOENIX ACAD INC K 5 No No 79.1 ~ NR 420 304 308 356 312 316 320 324 328 336 340 344 346 348 358 376 HALIFAX COUNTY AURELIAN SPRINGS BAKERS ELEM SCOTLAND NECK PRI BRAWLEY MID DAWSON ELEM EASTMAN MID ENFIELD MID EVERETTS ELEM HOLLISTER ELEM INBORDEN ELEM MCIVER ELEM NORTHWEST HS PITTMAN ELEM SOUTHEAST HALIFAX HS WILLIAM R DAVIE MID PK 3 PK 6 PK 6 6 PK PK PK PK 9 PK 9 6 5 5 2 8 5 8 8 5 5 5 5 12 5 12 8 No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes No No 68.1 59.7 68.3 91.9 73.9 59.7 61.2 80.4 60.2 84.5 35.9 79.4 28.1 62.2 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR NR NR NR Exm Exc MI NR NR NR Dst NR NR Exm Dst MI LP Exm LP NR 421 304 306 316 328 ROANOKE RAPIDS CITY BELMONT ELEM CHALONER MID ROANOKE RAPIDS HS WILLIAM L MANNING PK 6 9 PK 5 8 12 5 No No Yes Yes No No No Yes 73.9 78.4 64.4 88.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ NR NR Exp Exm Dst 422 304 314 318 324 WELDON CITY ANDREW JACKSON ELEM WELDON ELEM WELDON MID WELDON HS K PK 6 9 5 5 8 12 Yes No No No Yes No No No 69.9 51.7 53.9 24.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm NR NR LP 430 308 312 348 316 320 328 330 332 336 340 HARNETT COUNTY ANGIER ELEM BENHAVEN ELEM JOHNSONVILLE PRI BOONE TRAIL ELEM BUIES CREEK ELEM COATS ELEM COATS-ERWIN MID DUNN MID ERWIN ELEM GENTRY PRI 4 3 K K K K 6 6 3 PK 5 5 2 5 5 5 8 8 5 2 No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No 83.9 72.7 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 Dst NR NR NR Exp Exp Dst NR Exp Dst Exp NR NR 75.0 81.8 73.6 81.1 75.8 71.5 Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 24 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 430 344 346 347 352 356 368 370 372 376 304 378 380 384 386 K 9 6 K 4 K 6 PK 3 K 9 4 9 6 3 12 8 5 5 3 8 3 5 2 12 5 12 8 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes 72.6 68.5 80.9 91.0 80.1 77.6 69.5 82.9 76.2 43A HARNETT EARLY CHILD 000 HARNETT EARLY CHILD K 5 No 440 314 318 320 324 328 332 348 349 350 364 368 378 390 396 HAYWOOD COUNTY BETHEL ELEM BETHEL MID CANTON MID CENTRAL ELEM CLYDE ELEM RIVERBEND ELEM HAZELWOOD ELEM JONATHAN VALLEY ELEM JUNALUSKA ELEM MEADOWBROOK ELEM NORTH CANTON ELEM PISGAH HS TUSCOLA HS WAYNESVILLE MID K 6 6 PK K K K PK K PK PK 9 9 6 5 8 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 12 12 8 450 301 302 304 306 308 316 322 324 328 332 333 HENDERSON COUNTY APPLE VALLEY MID ATKINSON ELEM BALFOUR ELEM BRUCE DRYSDALE ELEM DANA ELEM EAST HENDERSON HS EDNEYVILLE ELEM ETOWAH ELEM FLAT ROCK MID FLETCHER ELEM HENDERSONVILLE ELEM 6 K PK K K 9 K K 6 K K 8 5 5 5 5 12 5 5 8 5 5 HARNETT COUNTY HARNETT PRI HARNETT CENTRAL HS HARNETT CENTRAL MID LAFAYETTE ELEM LILLINGTON ELEM NORTH HARNETT PRI OVERHILLS MID SHAWTOWN PRI SOUTH HARNETT ELEM ANDERSON CREEK PRI TRITON HS WAYNE AVENUE ELEM WESTERN HARNETT HS WESTERN HARNETT MID Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status 62.4 75.9 61.3 79.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp Dst NR Exp Exc Exp Dst Exp NR Exp Dst Exp Exp NR Exp Exp Exm No 35.7 * NR Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No No 84.6 87.4 85.0 84.7 93.2 82.2 80.3 88.1 82.2 83.3 88.2 68.9 76.6 83.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst Dst NR Dst NR Dst NR Exm Exc Dst NR Dst NR Exp Dst Exp Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst NR NR Dst NR Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes 82.2 88.9 88.4 77.0 88.7 72.0 87.8 91.7 88.0 88.8 94.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst Exp Dst Exm Dst Exm Exp Dst NR Exp Dst Exm Exc Exm Dst Exp Dst Exm Exc Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 25 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 450 334 335 336 339 340 341 342 346 352 9 6 K K K 9 6 PK 9 12 8 5 5 5 12 8 5 12 No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No No 74.6 87.3 80.3 84.7 94.3 68.5 88.9 82.7 74.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp Dst Dst NR Exm Dst Exm Exc NR Exm Dst Dst NR NR 45A MOUNTAIN CMTY SCH 000 MOUNTAIN CMTY SCH K 6 No No 88.4 ~ Dst NR 460 308 312 318 320 332 HERTFORD COUNTY AHOSKIE ELEM BEARFIELD PRIMARY HERTFORD CO MID HERTFORD COUNTY HS RIVERVIEW ELEM 3 PK 6 9 PK 5 2 8 12 5 No No No No No No No No No No 62.4 60.5 31.3 54.7 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ NR NR NR LP NR 470 312 316 320 328 330 332 336 340 346 441 HOKE COUNTY HOKE COUNTY HS J W MCLAUCHLIN ELEM WEST HOKE MID SCURLOCK ELEM SOUTH HOKE ELEM EAST HOKE MID WEST HOKE ELEM ROCKFISH HOKE ELEM UPCHURCH ELEM SANDY GROVE ELEM 9 K 6 PK PK 6 K K K K 12 5 8 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No 46.7 63.0 66.5 65.9 70.0 72.2 53.7 80.3 71.8 58.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp NR NR Exp NR NR NR Dst NR Exp NR 480 306 307 309 316 HYDE COUNTY MATTAMUSKEET ELEM MATTAMUSKEET HS MATTAMUSKEET MID OCRACOKE PK 9 6 K 5 12 8 12 Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No 66.8 51.1 78.6 86.9 ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Exm Exm Dst NR 490 302 376 308 312 316 IREDELL-STATESVILLE ALAN RUTHERFORD ELEM WAYSIDE ELEM BRAWLEY MID CELESTE HENKEL ELEM CENTRAL ELEM 3 PK 6 K K 5 2 8 5 5 No No Yes No No No No Yes No No 61.1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ NR NR Exm Dst NR NR HENDERSON COUNTY HENDERSONVILLE HS HENDERSONVILLE MID HILLANDALE ELEM GLENN C MARLOW ELEM MILLS RIVER ELEM NORTH HENDERSON HS RUGBY MID UPWARD ELEM WEST HENDERSON HS Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 89.2 75.7 78.2 Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 26 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 490 324 326 350 327 328 347 332 336 337 338 340 345 344 346 348 349 352 354 356 360 362 364 366 368 380 384 IREDELL-STATESVILLE COOL SPRING ELEM EAST IREDELL ELEM PRESSLY ELEM EAST MID EBENEZER ELEM NORTHVIEW ELEM HARMONY ELEM LAKE NORMAN ELEM LAKESHORE ELEM LAKESHORE MID MONTICELLO ELEM N B MILLS ELEM MOUNT MOURNE ELEM NORTH IREDELL HS SCOTTS ELEM NORTH IREDELL MID STATESVILLE MID STATESVILLE HS SHARON ELEM SHEPHERD ELEM SOUTH IREDELL HS TROUTMAN ELEM TROUTMAN MID UNION GROVE ELEM WEST IREDELL HS WEST IREDELL MID K 2 K 6 3 PK K K K 6 3 PK PK 9 K 6 6 9 K K 9 K 6 K 9 6 5 5 1 8 5 2 5 5 5 8 5 2 5 12 5 8 8 12 5 5 12 5 8 5 12 8 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No 79.7 71.0 491 306 308 312 316 320 MOORESVILLE CITY MOORESVILLE INT MOORESVILLE MID MOORESVILLE SR HS PARK VIEW ELEM SOUTH ELEM 4 7 9 PK K 6 8 12 3 3 Yes Yes No Yes Yes 49A AM RENAISSANCE 000 AM RENAISSANCE K 5 49B AM RENAISSANCE MID 000 AM RENAISSANCE MID 6 49D SUCCESS INSTITUTE 000 SUCCESS INSTITUTE K Spec. Cond. Status 85.1 65.3 77.4 74.6 66.4 66.7 78.3 88.4 68.2 70.8 75.9 74.5 67.0 76.1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp Exp Exm Exp Exp NR Exm Exc Exp Dst Exp Dst NR NR Dst NR NR Exp Exp NR Exp Exm Exm Dst NR NR NR NR Exp Exp No Yes No No Yes 81.0 89.4 65.1 74.6 85.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Dst Exm Dst NR Exp Exm Dst No No 64.0 ~ NR 8 No No 62.9 ~ NR 5 No No 45.3 * NR 76.2 73.2 71.8 93.5 84.2 83.6 70.4 Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 27 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 500 304 314 316 332 337 340 K PK PK K PK 9 8 8 12 8 8 12 Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No 86.1 82.7 71.2 74.1 77.0 68.3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Dst Dst NR Exp Exp NR NR 50A SUMMIT CHARTER 000 SUMMIT CHARTER K 8 No No 85.7 ~ Dst NR 510 308 310 324 326 328 329 330 332 336 340 342 344 356 358 360 368 372 376 378 388 390 396 404 397 399 402 408 412 PK 5 9 K PK 6 K PK PK K 6 6 K K K 9 K K K PK 5 3 PK 6 9 9 PK 6 4 9 12 5 5 8 5 8 5 5 8 8 5 5 8 12 5 12 6 4 9 5 2 8 12 12 5 8 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes 77.5 80.5 78.3 84.4 92.1 88.0 74.4 72.2 84.8 81.2 87.6 83.0 75.0 82.6 85.4 79.9 78.2 82.0 92.4 72.6 77.8 73.5 86.4 66.6 77.3 84.7 91.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Dst NR Exp Exp Dst Exp Exc Exp Dst NR NR Exp Dst Dst NR Dst NR Exm Dst Exp Exp Dst Exp Dst Exm Exp Exp Dst Exp Exc NR Exm NR NR Exp Dst Exp Exp Dst NR Exm Exc No No No No 70.0 78.6 ~ ~ NR NR JACKSON COUNTY CULLOWHEE VALLEY SCH FAIRVIEW ELEM BLUE RIDGE SCH SCOTTS CREEK ELEM SMOKEY MOUNTAIN ELEM SMOKY MOUNTAIN HS JOHNSTON COUNTY BENSON ELEM BENSON MID CLAYTON HS WEST CLAYTON ELEM CLEVELAND ELEM CLEVELAND MID COOPER ELEM CORINTH HOLDERS SCH EAST CLAYTON ELEM FOUR OAKS ELEM FOUR OAKS MID NORTH JOHNSTON MID GLENDALE-KENLY ELEM MCGEE'S CROSSROADS MEADOW ELEM NORTH JOHNSTON HS MICRO-PINE LEVEL PRINCETON HS RIVERWOOD ELEM SELMA ELEM SELMA MID SCH SMITHFIELD ELEM SOUTH SMITHFIELD PRI SMITHFIELD MID SMITHFIELD-SELMA HS SOUTH JOHNSTON HS WILSON'S MILLS ELEM CLAYTON MID 520 JONES COUNTY 304 POLLOCKSVILLE ELEM 308 COMFORT ELEM PK 5 PK 5 Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 28 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 520 320 324 328 336 JONES COUNTY JONES SENIOR HS JONES MID MAYSVILLE ELEM TRENTON ELEM 9 6 PK PK 12 8 5 5 Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes 47.2 79.1 73.8 85.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp NR Exm Exm Dst 530 302 308 312 314 320 336 340 346 354 356 LEE COUNTY BENJAMIN T BULLOCK BROADWAY ELEM DEEP RIVER ELEM EAST LEE MID GREENWOOD ELEM LEE COUNTY SR HS J GLENN EDWARDS ELEM TRAMWAY ELEM J R INGRAM JR ELEM WEST LEE MID PK K K 6 K 9 PK K K 6 5 5 5 8 5 12 5 5 5 8 Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No No 77.0 70.7 72.4 73.0 73.0 64.8 71.7 87.3 80.5 78.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exp Exp NR Exp NR Exp Exp Dst Exp Dst NR Status 53A PROVISIONS ACAD 000 PROVISIONS ACAD 6 12 No No 39.0 ~ LP 540 304 306 308 312 314 315 316 320 324 326 328 330 332 336 338 340 342 344 K 5 4 5 K 5 6 8 4 5 9 12 K 5 K 5 9 12 K 3 K 5 6 8 6 8 9 12 K 3 K 5 K 3 6 8 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes 87.6 91.8 79.3 87.3 72.3 60.8 76.4 86.5 63.5 88.9 85.6 69.1 78.1 69.0 67.7 78.2 61.4 83.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Dst Dst NR Exp Exm Dst Exp NR NR Exm Dst NR Exm Dst Exm Dst NR Exp NR Exp Exp NR Exm Dst K No No 47.0 * NR LENOIR COUNTY BANKS ELEM C H BYNUM ELEM CONTENTNEA ELEM E B FRINK MID J H SAMPSON ELEM KINSTON HS LAGRANGE ELEM MOSS HILL ELEM NORTH LENOIR HS NORTHWEST ELEM PINK HILL ELEM ROCHELLE MID SAVANNAH MID SOUTH LENOIR HS SOUTHEAST ELEM SOUTHWOOD ELEM TEACHERS MEMORIAL WOODINGTON MID 54A CHILDREN'S ACAD 000 CHILDREN'S ACAD 5 Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 29 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 550 312 314 316 320 322 328 332 334 336 342 348 350 356 360 364 368 372 K K PK 9 6 K 9 6 K K K 6 K K K 9 6 5 5 5 12 8 5 12 8 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 12 8 No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No 71.4 76.3 69.1 70.6 72.3 71.4 69.9 73.4 76.5 83.4 83.6 84.3 86.7 77.1 80.5 60.0 78.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp Exp Exp NR Exp Exm Exp Exm Exm Dst Exp Dst Exp Dst Exm Dst Exp Exm Dst NR NR 55A LINCOLN CHARTER 000 LINCOLN CHARTER K 7 Yes No 80.6 ~ Exp Dst 560 304 308 328 312 316 320 324 330 332 336 340 MACON COUNTY CARTOOGECHAYE ELEM COWEE ELEM IOTLA ELEM CULLASAJA ELEM EAST FRANKLIN ELEM FRANKLIN HS HIGHLANDS SCH MACON COUNTY MID NANTAHALA SCH OTTO ELEM UNION ELEM K 5 3 5 K 2 K 5 K 5 9 12 K 12 6 8 K 12 K 5 K 5 Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No 90.6 86.7 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exc Dst NR NR Exm Dst Exp Dst NR Exp Dst NR NR Exp Dst Dst NR 570 312 316 318 319 320 324 326 332 MADISON COUNTY HOT SPRINGS ELEM LAUREL ELEM MADISON HS MADISON MID MARS HILL ELEM MARSHALL ELEM MARSHALL PRI WALNUT ELEM K K 9 6 K 3 K PK Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No 92.0 92.0 67.3 82.0 91.1 82.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ Exm Exc MI Exm Exc MI NR Dst NR Exm Exc Exm Dst Exm Exp Dst LINCOLN COUNTY BATTLEGROUND ELEM CATAWBA SPRINGS ELEM G E MASSEY ELEM EAST LINCOLN HS EAST LINCOLN MID IRON STATION ELEM LINCOLNTON HS LINCOLNTON MID LOVE MEMORIAL ELEM NORTH BROOK ELEM PUMPKIN CTR ELEM PUMPKIN CTR MID ROCK SPRINGS ELEM S RAY LOWDER ELEM UNION ELEM WEST LINCOLN HS WEST LINCOLN MID 5 5 12 8 5 5 2 5 Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 88.2 85.1 68.0 82.5 79.9 77.9 88.9 88.3 81.7 Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 30 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 580 304 312 308 316 320 324 328 344 350 356 364 368 372 MARTIN COUNTY BEAR GRASS HS E J HAYES ELEM WILLIAMSTON PRI EAST END ELEM EDNA ANDREWS ELEM JAMESVILLE SCH JAMESVILLE HS ROANOKE HS ROANOKE MID RODGERS ELEM WEST MARTIN ELEM WILLIAMSTON HS WILLIAMSTON MID 7 3 PK PK PK PK 7 9 6 PK K 9 6 12 5 2 5 5 6 12 12 8 6 5 12 8 Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No 78.7 62.9 590 306 310 316 320 330 332 336 340 344 352 356 MCDOWELL COUNTY EASTFIELD ELEM EAST MCDOWELL JR HS GLENWOOD ELEM MARION ELEM MCDOWELL HS NEBO ELEM NORTH COVE ELEM OLD FORT ELEM PLEASANT GARDENS WEST MARION ELEM WEST MCDOWELL JR HS K 6 7 9 K 6 K 6 9 12 K 6 K 6 K 6 K 6 K 6 7 9 Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No 600 300 301 305 308 311 314 316 319 322 326 329 331 333 335 338 341 CHARLOTTE/MECKLENBURG ALBEMARLE ROAD ELEM ALBEMARLE ROAD MID J M ALEXANDER MID ALLENBROOK ELEM ASHLEY PARK ELEM BAIN ELEM BARRINGER ACAD CTR BERRYHILL ELEM BEVERLY WOODS ELEM BILLINGSVILLE ELEM BRIARWOOD ELEM BRUNS AVENUE ELEM CARMEL MID CHANTILLY ELEM CLEAR CREEK ELEM COCHRANE MID K 5 6 8 6 12 K 5 K 5 K 5 K 5 K 5 K 5 K 5 K 5 K 5 6 8 K 5 K 5 6 8 Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Spec. Cond. Status 63.7 68.3 76.1 69.0 50.5 56.6 73.5 63.1 56.5 63.1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp NR NR NR Exp NR Exm MI Exm NR Exp Exm Exm NR No No No No No No No No No No No 74.1 79.5 79.1 83.3 63.4 79.5 84.0 82.4 82.6 74.1 83.9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp NR NR Exp Dst NR NR Exp Dst Dst NR Exp Dst NR Dst NR Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No 78.7 65.7 79.8 70.5 66.9 86.6 99.1 54.7 74.6 69.2 63.4 80.5 82.0 79.6 75.9 47.3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * Exm NR Exp Exp NR Exp Dst Exm Exc NR Exp Exp Exp Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exp NR Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 31 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 600 344 346 349 351 352 353 357 358 360 361 362 363 365 368 374 377 379 381 382 384 393 394 396 398 399 405 406 407 410 412 414 416 420 422 424 426 427 428 429 430 434 436 438 440 441 442 444 446 447 K K K 6 K 6 K 6 6 9 K K K K K 9 K 6 K K K 6 9 K 6 9 K 6 K K K K K K K 9 K 6 K K 6 K K K K K K K K CHARLOTTE/MECKLENBURG COLLINSWOOD ELEM CORNELIUS ELEM COTSWOLD ELEM COULWOOD MID CROWN POINT ELEM CRESTDALE MID DAVIDSON ELEM DAVIDSON INT BACC MID MARIE G DAVIS MID DAVID W BUTLER HS DAVID COX ROAD ELEM DERITA ELEM DEVONSHIRE ELEM DILWORTH ELEM DRUID HILLS ELEM EAST MECKLENBURG HS EASTOVER ELEM EASTWAY MID ELIZABETH LANE ELEM ELIZABETH TRAD/CLASS FIRST WARD ELEM FRANCIS BRADLEY MID GARINGER HS GREENWAY PARK ELEM ALEXANDER GRAHAM MID HARDING UNIV HS HAWK RIDGE ELEM HAWTHORNE TRAD MID HICKORY GROVE ELEM HIDDEN VALLEY ELEM HIGHLAND ELEM HORNETS NEST ELEM HUNTERSVILLE ELEM HUNTINGTOWNE ELEM IDLEWILD ELEM INDEPENDENCE HS IRWIN AVE OPEN JAMES MARTIN MID JOHN MOTLEY MOREHEAD A JAMES MONTESSORI ROBERT F KENNEDY MID LAKE WYLIE ELEM LANSDOWNE ELEM LEBANON ROAD ELEM LINCOLN HEIGHTS ELEM LEGETTE BLYTHE ELEM LONG CREEK ELEM MALLARD CREEK MATTHEWS ELEM 5 5 5 8 5 8 5 8 8 12 5 5 5 5 5 12 5 8 5 5 5 8 12 5 8 12 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 12 5 8 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Growth Expected Exemplary Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Performance Composite 79.8 89.4 68.1 65.2 81.4 94.1 94.6 96.0 91.2 60.5 86.2 69.6 64.4 72.6 70.0 64.7 81.1 57.9 95.8 93.1 75.3 73.9 34.0 78.7 76.0 64.5 95.6 55.4 77.7 57.7 73.1 78.9 79.1 81.3 64.6 59.8 64.5 69.8 65.3 84.3 78.5 77.0 78.3 73.2 69.1 79.6 67.4 80.4 89.7 Spec. Cond. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 32 Status Exp Exp Dst NR Exm Exm Dst Exm Exc Exm Exc Exp Exc Exp Exc Exp Exm Dst Exm Exp Exp Exp Exm Exm Dst Exp Exm Exc Exp Exc Exp Exm 95R Exm Exm Exp Exm Exc NR Exp Exp Exm Exp Exm Exm Dst NR Exm Exp NR NR Exp Dst Exm Exp Exp Exp Exp Exp NR Exp Dst Exp Dst A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 600 449 450 451 453 459 464 466 468 471 474 478 479 480 481 482 485 487 489 490 491 492 494 495 497 500 501 503 508 509 512 513 514 516 517 519 520 522 527 530 532 534 535 537 541 544 546 549 550 553 K 6 K K K K 9 K K K K 6 9 6 6 K K K 9 K K K K 6 K K K 9 6 K 6 6 K K K 6 K K K 6 K 9 6 6 K K K K K CHARLOTTE/MECKLENBURG MCALPINE ELEM MCCLINTOCK MID MCKEE ROAD ELEM MERRY OAKS ELEM MONTCLAIRE ELEM MYERS PARK TRAD ELEM MYERS PARK HS NATHANIEL ALEXANDER NATIONS FORD ELEM NEWELL ELEM J H GUNN ELEM NORTHEAST MID NORTH MECKLENBURG HS NORTHRIDGE MID NORTHWEST HS OAKDALE ELEM OAKHURST ELEM OAKLAWN ELEM OLYMPIC HS OLDE PROVIDENCE ELEM PARK ROAD ELEM PAW CREEK ELEM PAWTUCKETT ELEM PIEDMONT OPEN MID PINEVILLE ELEM PINEWOOD ELEM PINEY GROVE ELEM PROVIDENCE HS QUAIL HOLLOW MID RAMA ROAD ELEM RANDOLPH MID RANSON MID REEDY CREEK ELEM REID PARK ELEM SEDGEFIELD ELEM SEDGEFIELD MID SELWYN ELEM SHAMROCK GARDENS ELEM SHARON ELEM SMITH MID SMITHFIELD ELEM SOUTH MECKLENBURG HS SOUTH CHARLOTTE MID SPAUGH MID STARMOUNT ELEM STATESVILLE ROAD STEELE CREEK ELEM STERLING ELEM THOMASBORO ELEM 5 8 5 5 5 5 12 5 5 5 5 8 12 8 12 5 5 5 12 5 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 12 8 5 8 8 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 8 5 12 8 8 5 5 5 5 5 Growth Expected Exemplary Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Performance Composite 95.0 77.6 97.6 61.1 69.0 84.8 66.8 79.1 82.1 82.5 69.0 82.0 64.6 71.9 62.6 66.6 84.9 75.4 41.6 92.3 67.8 64.2 60.5 76.9 81.6 68.6 82.6 77.2 73.9 69.1 69.0 57.2 79.9 84.8 64.2 62.5 77.5 58.9 67.2 73.9 72.5 65.3 92.4 78.4 66.7 66.9 72.8 68.1 53.8 Spec. Cond. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 33 Status Exm Exc Exp Exm Exc Exm NR Exp Dst Exp Exm Exp Dst Exp Dst NR Exm Dst Exp Exm NR NR Dst NR Exp Exp Exm Exc Exm NR NR Exm Dst NR Exp Exm Dst Exp NR Exm NR NR Exm Exm Dst NR NR Exm NR NR Exp Exm Exp Exm Exc NR Exm Exm NR Exp Exm A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 600 562 565 566 571 576 577 579 581 585 586 587 589 592 K 5 K 5 K 5 K 5 9 12 K 5 9 12 6 8 6 8 K 5 K 5 K 5 9 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No 69.6 79.0 68.1 98.5 26.9 59.4 47.2 88.6 48.9 71.7 65.5 64.1 57.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Exm Exp Exp Exc LP/95R NR Exm Exp Dst NR NR Exp Exp Exp 60A COMMUNITY CHARTER SCH 000 COMMUNITY CHARTER SCH K 5 No No 57.0 ~ NR 60B SUGAR CREEK CHARTER 000 SUGAR CREEK CHARTER K 5 No No 41.1 ~ LP 60C KENNEDY CHARTER 000 KENNEDY CHARTER 5 12 Yes Yes 16.3 ~ Exm MI 60D LAKE NORMAN CHARTER 000 LAKE NORMAN CHARTER 5 8 Yes Yes 93.2 ~ Exm Exc 60F METROLINA REG SCHOLARS 000 METROLINA REG SCHOLARS K 6 No No 98.7 ~ Dst NR 610 302 308 310 322 320 326 334 336 5 K K K PK 4 9 K 8 8 3 2 4 8 12 8 No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No 73.2 73.0 80.8 81.8 84.9 63.7 87.3 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ NR NR Dst NR NR Dst NR Exm Dst NR Dst NR K 6 5 8 Yes No Yes No 60.1 53.9 ~ ~ Exm NR CHARLOTTE/MECKLENBURG TUCKASEEGEE ELEM UNIV PARK CREAT ARTS UNIV MEADOWS ELEM VILLA HEIGHTS ELEM WEST CHARLOTTE HS WESTERLY HILLS ELEM WEST MECKLENBURG HS J T WILLIAMS MID WILSON MID WINDING SPRINGS ELEM WINDSOR PARK ELEM WINTERFIELD ELEM ZEBULON B VANCE HS MITCHELL COUNTY BOWMAN MID BULADEAN ELEM DEYTON ELEM GREENLEE PRIMARY GOUGE ELEM HARRIS MID MITCHELL HS TIPTON HILL ELEM 620 MONTGOMERY COUNTY 312 CANDOR ELEM 314 EAST MID Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 34 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 620 316 324 334 336 339 340 MONTGOMERY COUNTY EAST MONTGOMERY HS MOUNT GILEAD ELEM STAR-BISCOE ELEM TROY ELEM WEST MID WEST MONTGOMERY HS 9 12 K 5 K 5 K 5 6 8 9 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No 50.3 66.8 66.3 61.6 65.2 52.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Exp Exp Exp NR NR 630 308 304 312 316 320 324 328 331 332 336 340 342 348 350 356 352 360 364 368 374 376 MOORE COUNTY ABERDEEN ELEM ABERDEEN PRIMARY CAMERON ELEM CARTHAGE ELEM ELISE MID SANDHILLS-FARM LIFE HIGHFALLS ELEM NEW CENTURY MID NORTH MOORE HS PINECREST HS ACADEMY HEIGHTS ELEM PINEHURST ELEM ROBBINS ELEM SOUTHERN MID SOUTHERN PINES ELEM SOUTHERN PINES PRI UNION PINES HS VASS-LAKEVIEW ELEM WEST END ELEM WEST PINE MID WESTMOORE ELEM 3 PK K K 6 K K 6 9 9 K K K 6 3 K 9 K K 6 K 5 2 5 5 8 5 8 8 12 12 5 5 5 8 5 2 12 5 5 8 8 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No 69.6 64.8 84.2 87.4 90.6 78.9 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR NR Exp Exm Exm Exm Exc MI Exm Exc MI Exp Dst Exm NR Exm Exc Exp Dst Exp Exm Exp Exp Exp Exp Dst Exm Dst Exm Exc Exp 63A MAST SCHOOL 000 MAST 5 8 No No 65.1 ~ NR 63B STAR CHARTER 000 STARS CHARTER K 4 No No 54.3 ~ NR 640 304 306 308 316 320 324 326 327 PK PK PK PK 8 PK PK PK 5 5 5 5 9 5 5 K No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No No 82.2 66.4 90.8 88.0 78.2 81.3 75.8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 Dst NR NR Exp Exc Exm Dst NR Dst NR NR NR NASH/ROCKY MOUNT BAILEY ELEM BASKERVILLE ELEM BENVENUE ELEM CEDAR GROVE ELEM NASH CENTRAL JR HS COOPERS ELEM D S JOHNSON ELEM FAIRVIEW CHILDHD CTR Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 79.6 78.9 79.0 92.6 93.0 83.2 75.0 68.5 92.0 89.0 70.3 79.0 78.1 Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 35 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 640 328 329 331 332 334 336 348 350 354 358 360 361 362 364 376 384 396 400 PK 8 PK PK 6 PK PK 10 PK 6 PK 10 6 9 PK PK PK PK 5 9 5 5 7 5 5 12 5 7 5 12 8 12 5 5 5 5 Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 91.1 72.2 73.2 87.4 68.3 71.4 90.9 56.4 58.9 75.6 87.5 57.6 79.3 57.1 77.1 53.8 66.8 85.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Exc NR NR Exp Dst NR Exp Exp Exc NR NR NR Exp Dst NR NR Exp NR NR NR Exp Dst 64A ROCKY MOUNT CHARTER 000 ROCKY MOUNT CHARTER K 7 Yes Yes 65.0 ~ Exm 650 304 308 312 316 320 324 325 326 328 332 338 339 340 341 342 346 350 351 352 353 356 360 362 364 K K K PK 6 K 6 9 K PK PK K PK K 9 PK 6 6 9 K K PK K 6 5 5 5 5 8 5 8 12 5 5 5 5 5 5 12 5 8 8 12 5 5 5 5 8 Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No 82.7 80.0 63.9 71.5 72.7 89.4 79.9 69.3 77.2 89.6 87.3 92.1 80.2 83.0 74.0 73.5 87.9 86.1 64.9 96.2 90.3 82.4 83.0 89.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Dst Exp Dst NR NR NR Exm Dst NR Exp Exp Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exc Exm Dst Exp Dst Exp NR Dst NR Exp Dst NR Exm Exc Exp Exc Exp Dst Dst NR Dst NR NASH/ROCKY MOUNT ENGLEWOOD ELEM G R EDWARDS JR HS JAMES C BRASWELL ELEM M B HUBBARD ELEM J W PARKER MID MIDDLESEX ELEM NASHVILLE ELEM NORTHERN NASH HS O R POPE ELEM RED OAK MID RED OAK ELEM ROCKY MOUNT HS SOUTHERN NASH MID SOUTHERN NASH SR HS SPRING HOPE ELEM SWIFT CREEK ELEM WILLIFORD ELEM WINSTEAD AVENUE ELEM NEW HANOVER COUNTY BRADLEY CREEK ELEM CAROLINA BEACH ELEM RACHEL FREEMAN ELEM COLLEGE PARK ELEM D C VIRGO MID EDWIN A ALDERMAN ELEM EMMA B TRASK MID EMSLEY A LANEY HS FOREST HILLS ELEM GREGORY ELEM HEYWARD C BELLAMY ELEM HOLLY TREE ELEM J C ROE ELEM JOHN J BLAIR ELEM JOHN T HOGGARD HS MARY C WILLIAMS ELEM M C S NOBLE MID MYRTLE GROVE MID NEW HANOVER HS DR HUBERT EATON ELEM OGDEN ELEM DOROTHY B JOHNSON ELEM PINE VALLEY ELEM ROLAND-GRISE MID Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 36 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools Grade Span System and School(s) 650 366 368 384 392 400 404 408 NEW HANOVER COUNTY DR JOHN CODINGTON ELEM K 5 SUNSET PARK ELEM PK 5 WILLIAM H BLOUNT ELEM K 5 WILLISTON MID 6 8 WINTER PARK MODEL ELEM K 5 WRIGHTSBORO ELEM K 5 WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH K 5 Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes 90.0 77.8 68.8 77.7 91.1 83.6 92.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exc Exp NR NR Exm Exc Exm Dst Exm Exc 65A CAPE FEAR CTR FOR INQ 000 CAPE FEAR CTR FOR INQ K 5 No No 89.7 ~ Dst NR 660 304 308 312 316 320 324 336 356 360 364 NORTHAMPTON COUNTY SEABOARD-COATES ELEM CONWAY MID JACKSON-EASTSIDE ELEM GARYSBURG ELEM GASTON MIDDLE NORTHAMPTON HS-WEST NORTHAMPTON HS-EAST SQUIRE ELEM WILLIS HARE ELEM RICH SQUARE-CREECY PK 6 PK PK 6 9 9 PK PK PK 5 8 5 5 8 12 12 5 5 5 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 60.9 61.8 73.9 71.7 63.9 41.3 45.5 64.6 73.6 58.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR NR NR NR NR LP LP NR NR NR 670 304 308 312 314 318 320 321 322 323 324 325 330 331 332 335 336 338 339 340 341 342 343 ONSLOW COUNTY BELL FORK ELEM BLUE CREEK ELEM CLYDE ERWIN ELEM DIXON ELEM DIXON MID DIXON HS HUNTERS CREEK ELEM HUNTERS CREEK MID JACKSONVILLE COM ELEM JACKSONVILLE HS JACKSONVILLE COM MID MORTON ELEM NEW BRIDGE MID NORTHWOODS ELEM QUEENS CREEK ELEM NORTHWOODS PARK MID PARKWOOD ELEM RICHLANDS ELEM RICHLANDS HS SAND RIDGE ELEM SILVERDALE ELEM SOUTHWEST ELEM PK PK PK PK 6 9 PK 6 PK 9 6 PK 6 PK K 6 PK PK 9 K PK PK 5 5 5 5 8 12 5 8 5 12 8 5 8 5 5 8 5 5 12 5 5 5 Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes 91.0 84.8 76.6 81.1 84.3 65.9 82.7 86.8 83.9 68.0 82.7 79.6 90.4 85.2 83.1 80.4 89.6 84.1 61.7 90.0 87.3 86.9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exc Exm Dst NR Dst NR Dst NR Exp Exm Dst Exm Dst Exp Dst Exp Exm Dst Exm Exm Exc Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exp Exm Exc MI Exp Dst Exm Dst MI Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 37 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 670 344 345 346 350 351 352 356 360 364 ONSLOW COUNTY SOUTHWEST HS SOUTHWEST MID SUMMERSILL ELEM SWANSBORO ELEM SWANSBORO MID SWANSBORO HS TREXLER MID WALTER THOMPSON ELEM WHITE OAK HS 9 6 PK PK 6 9 6 PK 9 12 8 5 5 8 12 8 5 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No 72.5 88.9 83.4 88.3 84.0 66.2 82.3 69.2 66.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Exm Dst Exp Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exp Dst Exp NR 680 304 308 312 336 316 324 328 329 330 332 ORANGE COUNTY A L STANBACK MID CAMERON PARK ELEM CENTRAL ELEM PATHWAYS ELEM CHARLES STANFORD MID EFLAND CHEEKS ELEM GRADY BROWN ELEM HILLSBOROUGH ELEM NEW HOPE ELEM ORANGE SENIOR HS 6 8 K 5 K 5 K 2 6 8 K 5 K 5 K 5 K 5 9 12 No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes 82.6 84.5 79.3 76.6 78.1 84.9 91.6 81.7 71.6 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dst NR Dst NR NR NR Exp Exp Exm Dst Exm Exc Exp Dst Exm 681 304 308 309 310 311 312 314 316 320 322 324 326 330 CHAPEL HILL/CARRBORO CARRBORO ELEM CHAPEL HILL HS C & L MCDOUGLE MID ELIZABETH SEAWELL ELEM EPHESUS ROAD ELEM ESTES HILLS ELEM EAST CHAPEL HILL HS FRANK P GRAHAM ELEM GLENWOOD ELEM GREY CULBRETH MID GUY PHILLIPS MID C&L MCDOUGLE ELEM MARY SCROGGS ELEM K 9 6 PK K K 9 K PK 6 6 PK PK 5 12 8 5 5 5 12 5 5 8 8 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes 85.7 87.3 93.6 89.9 91.7 88.5 86.4 91.3 90.2 92.8 94.2 92.1 88.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Dst Exm Dst MI Exm Exc Exm Dst Exp Exc Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exc Exp Exc Exp Exc Exp Exc Exm Exc Exm Dst MI 68A ORANGE CO CHARTER 000 ORANGE CO CHARTER K 8 No No 86.8 ~ Dst NR 68B NEW CENTURY CHARTER 000 NEW CENTURY CHARTER 9 12 No No 26.1 ~ LP Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 38 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 68K VILLAGE CHARTER 000 VILLAGE CHARTER K 8 No No 73.1 ~ NR 690 312 324 316 320 3 PK 6 9 5 2 8 12 Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No 80.8 84.4 64.7 ~ 1 ~ ~ Exm Dst Exm Dst NR NR 69A ARAPAHOE CHARTER 000 ARAPAHOE CHARTER K 8 Yes No 81.8 ~ Exp Dst 700 306 308 314 316 317 318 319 320 322 324 328 PASQUOTANK COUNTY CENTRAL ELEM ELIZABETH CITY MID NORTHSIDE ELEM J C SAWYER ELEM NORTHEASTERN HS PASQUOTANK ELEM PASQUOTANK COUNTY HS P W MOORE ELEM RIVER ROAD MID SHEEP-HARNEY ELEM WEEKSVILLE ELEM K 6 PK PK 9 PK 9 PK 6 PK K 5 8 5 5 12 5 12 5 8 5 5 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes 84.8 71.8 76.0 75.3 54.8 63.1 56.8 69.2 73.1 68.5 83.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst NR Exp Exm Exp NR NR Exm NR Exp Exm Dst 710 312 316 323 324 326 328 332 342 346 347 348 PENDER COUNTY BURGAW ELEM BURGAW MID NORTH TOPSAIL ELEM MALPASS CORNER ELEM PENDER HS PENDERLEA ELEM ROCKY POINT ELEM TOPSAIL HS TOPSAIL MID SOUTH TOPSAIL ELEM WEST PENDER MID PK 6 K PK 9 K PK 9 6 K 6 5 8 5 5 12 8 5 12 8 5 8 No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes No Yes Yes 75.9 81.7 89.8 78.6 70.9 84.5 85.2 85.2 92.5 92.4 82.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Dst NR Exm Dst NR Exp Exp Dst Dst NR Exm Dst Exp Exc Exm Exc Exm Dst 720 312 304 316 PERQUIMANS COUNTY HERTFORD GRAMMAR PERQUIMANS CENTRAL PERQUIMANS CO HS 3 5 PK 2 9 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 77.9 ~ 1 ~ Exm Exm Exp PAMLICO COUNTY FRED A ANDERSON ELEM PAMLICO CO PRI PAMLICO CO MID PAMLICO COUNTY HS Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 67.6 Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 39 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 720 PERQUIMANS COUNTY 320 PERQUIMANS CO MID 6 8 Yes No 79.4 ~ Exp 730 332 334 340 344 348 352 354 356 360 368 K K K 6 K 9 K PK 6 K 5 5 5 8 5 12 5 5 8 5 Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No 87.0 65.2 78.8 85.0 90.1 65.1 85.0 65.7 77.7 91.8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst Exp Exp Dst NR Exm Exc NR Exm Dst NR Exp Exp Exc 73A BETHEL HILL CHARTER 000 BETHEL HILL CHARTER K 6 No No 60.0 ~ NR 740 302 304 308 309 310 320 324 332 333 334 336 337 338 340 344 352 358 366 374 376 380 382 386 360 390 396 400 402 6 K 5 9 PK PK 6 K 9 PK K 6 K 6 9 K K 9 9 K K K 3 K K PK K 6 8 4 8 12 5 8 8 8 12 5 5 8 5 8 12 8 8 12 12 5 5 5 5 2 5 8 5 8 Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes Yes No 79.7 68.4 72.7 59.3 54.8 72.8 75.5 86.1 68.8 61.0 81.4 87.6 80.6 78.2 62.7 73.6 70.5 75.1 51.0 60.7 72.4 64.6 53.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exp NR NR NR Exp Exp Exm Dst Exp NR Exm Dst Exp Dst Exm Dst Exm NR NR Exp Exm Exp Exp Exp Exp NR NR NR Exm Dst Exm Dst NR PERSON COUNTY HELENA ELEM NORTH ELEM NORTH END ELEM NORTHERN MID OAK LANE ELEM PERSON HS STORIES CREEK ELEM SOUTH ELEM SOUTHERN MID WOODLAND ELEM PITT COUNTY A G COX MID AYDEN ELEM AYDEN MID AYDEN-GRIFTON HS BELVOIR ELEM BETHEL ELEM C M EPPES MID CHICOD ELEM D H CONLEY HS FALKLAND ELEM EASTERN ELEM E B AYCOCK MID ELMHURST ELEM FARMVILLE MID FARMVILLE CENTRAL HS GRIFTON ELEM G R WHITFIELD ELEM J H ROSE HS NORTH PITT HS PACTOLUS ELEM W H ROBINSON ELEM SADIE SAULTER ELEM SAM D BUNDY ELEM H B SUGG ELEM S GREENVILLE ELEM STOKES ELEM WAHL COATES ELEM WELLCOME MID Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 58.1 83.1 81.5 64.3 Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 40 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 740 PITT COUNTY 404 WINTERGREEN INT 406 WINTERGREEN PRI 3 K 6 2 Yes Yes No No 68.3 ~ 1 Exp Exp 750 304 306 314 318 320 328 POLK COUNTY TRYON ELEM TRYON MID POLK CENTRAL POLK COUNTY HS SALUDA ELEM SUNNY VIEW ELEM PK 6 PK 9 PK PK 5 8 8 12 8 5 Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes 94.7 94.6 83.5 70.2 89.8 83.3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exc Exp Exc Dst NR NR Exp Dst Exm Dst MI 760 304 308 316 318 320 324 328 330 331 332 336 338 340 344 348 352 356 357 358 360 364 368 376 378 380 RANDOLPH COUNTY ARCHDALE ELEM BRAXTON CRAVEN COLERIDGE ELEM EASTERN RANDOLPH HS FARMER ELEM FRANKLINVILLE ELEM GRAYS CHAPEL ELEM JOHN R LAWRENCE ELEM LEVEL CROSS ELEM LIBERTY ELEM NEW MARKET ELEM NE RANDOLPH MID RAMSEUR ELEM RANDLEMAN ELEM RANDLEMAN HS RANDLEMAN MID SEAGROVE ELEM S E RANDOLPH MID SOUTHWESTERN HS S W RANDOLPH MID TABERNACLE ELEM TRINDALE ELEM TRINITY ELEM ARCHDALE-TRINITY MID TRINITY HS K 6 K 9 K K K PK K K K 6 PK K 9 6 K 6 9 6 K K K 7 9 5 6 5 12 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 5 5 12 8 5 8 12 8 5 5 5 8 12 No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No 83.8 83.8 69.5 61.9 87.9 78.8 81.8 88.3 72.4 78.3 80.5 74.7 72.0 79.7 53.7 74.4 77.6 79.5 73.2 80.1 78.7 79.8 75.3 81.1 63.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dst NR Exp Dst NR NR Exp Dst NR Dst NR Exp Dst Exp Exp Exp Dst NR NR Exp Exp NR Exp NR Exm Dst NR Exp Exp Exm Dst NR NR 761 304 308 312 320 321 328 332 ASHEBORO CITY ASHEBORO HS SOUTH ASHEBORO MID BALFOUR ELEM CHARLES MCCRARY ELEM DONNA L LOFLIN ELEM GUY B TEACHEY ELEM LINDLEY PARK ELEM 9 12 6 8 K 5 K 5 K 5 K 5 K 5 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No 62.0 84.5 67.9 61.4 73.8 90.5 80.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exm Dst NR Exp Exp Exm Exc Exp Dst Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 41 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 761 ASHEBORO CITY 336 NORTH ASHEBORO MID 6 8 Yes No 78.6 ~ Exp 770 304 312 316 318 328 332 340 344 346 347 348 360 364 366 368 370 RICHMOND COUNTY ASHLEY CHAPEL ELEM CORDOVA ELEM ELLERBE JR HS FAIRVIEW HEIGHTS ELEM HAMLET JUNIOR HS HOFFMAN ELEM L J BELL ELEM MINERAL SPRINGS ELEM MONROE AVENUE ELEM RICHMOND PRIMARY RICHMOND SENIOR HS ROCKINGHAM JUNIOR HS ROHANEN JUNIOR HS ROHANEN PRI WEST ROCKINGHAM ELEM WASHINGTON STREET 4 K 6 K 7 K K K 4 PK 10 7 7 PK K 4 6 6 9 3 9 6 3 5 6 3 12 9 9 3 6 6 No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No 59.9 84.5 73.1 64.9 79.5 53.1 71.9 58.5 67.4 60.5 59.1 71.1 64.1 51.1 78.0 69.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exm Dst NR Exm NR NR Exm Exp NR Exp Exp NR NR NR Exm NR 780 320 322 324 325 326 328 329 330 336 340 341 342 344 352 356 360 364 368 374 376 384 390 391 392 393 394 ROBESON COUNTY DEEP BRANCH ELEM EAST ROBESON PRI FAIRGROVE ELEM FAIRMONT HS FAIRMONT MID GREEN GROVE ELEM JANIE HARGRAVE ELEM L G CARROLL MID LITTLEFIELD MID LONG BRANCH ELEM LUMBERTON JUNIOR HS LUMBERTON SENIOR HS MAGNOLIA ELEM ORRUM MID OXENDINE ELEM PARKTON ELEM PEMBROKE ELEM PEMBROKE MID PETERSON ELEM PINEY GROVE ELEM PROSPECT ELEM R B DEAN ELEM RED SPRINGS HS REX-RENNERT ELEM RED SPRINGS MID ROSENWALD ELEM PK PK 4 9 5 PK PK 5 4 PK 7 9 PK 5 PK PK PK 6 K PK PK PK 9 PK 5 PK 6 3 8 12 8 3 4 6 8 4 8 12 8 8 6 8 5 8 4 6 8 4 12 6 8 4 No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No 63.6 81.0 65.9 47.3 60.3 72.6 81.2 74.1 69.3 64.8 65.5 50.8 60.3 74.8 68.6 68.2 74.3 68.7 69.6 74.8 71.3 64.8 33.8 58.3 58.8 71.3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exm Dst NR Exp NR Exm MI Exp Dst NR NR Exp NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Exp Exm NR Exp Exm LP NR NR Exp Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 42 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 780 396 398 400 401 402 403 407 408 410 412 416 417 418 420 6 K PK 9 9 6 K PK 5 PK PK PK PK 9 8 4 5 12 12 8 4 5 8 6 6 4 4 12 No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No 66.7 76.2 70.5 42.3 34.2 63.4 86.8 73.7 60.7 72.7 75.4 56.4 81.6 47.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * NR Exp NR LP LP NR Exm Dst Exm NR NR Exp NR Exm Dst MI NR 78A CIS ACAD 000 CIS ACAD 6 8 Yes Yes 39.0 ~ Exm 790 302 310 314 318 322 330 338 344 347 350 354 358 362 334 366 370 374 378 380 386 390 394 398 402 PK K 9 PK PK 6 PK PK K K 9 K 3 PK 8 4 6 9 6 PK PK 6 K PK 5 5 12 5 5 8 3 5 5 5 12 5 5 2 12 5 8 12 8 3 5 8 5 3 Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No 83.5 84.1 61.3 69.6 67.7 77.2 53.1 66.3 64.2 84.2 64.4 64.3 80.4 56.7 74.1 67.4 67.2 81.8 76.7 75.7 79.7 79.5 67.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Dst Exp Dst Exp NR NR NR NR NR NR Exp Dst Exm NR Exp Dst Exp NR NR NR NR Exm Dst NR Exp NR Exp Exp 6 8 No No 63.8 ~ NR ROBESON COUNTY ROWLAND MID ROWLAND NORMENT ELEM SAINT PAULS ELEM SAINT PAULS HS SOUTH ROBESON HS SAINT PAULS MID TANGLEWOOD ELEM SOUTHSIDE/ASHPOLE TOWNSEND MID UNION CHAPEL ELEM UNION ELEM W H KNUCKLES MONT WEST LUMBERTON ELEM PURNELL SWETT HS ROCKINGHAM COUNTY BETHANY ELEM CENTRAL ELEM DALTON MCMICHAEL HS DOUGLASS ELEM DRAPER ELEM J E HOLMES MID LAWSONVILLE AVE ELEM LEAKSVILLE-SPRAY LINCOLN ELEM MONROETON ELEM JOHN M MOREHEAD HS MOSS STREET ELEM NEW VISION INT JOHN W DILLARD PRI REIDSVILLE HS REIDSVILLE INT REIDSVILLE MID ROCKINGHAM CO HS ROCKINGHAM CO MID SOUTH END ELEM STONEVILLE ELEM WEST ROCKINGHAM MID WENTWORTH ELEM WILLIAMSBURG ELEM 79A BETHANY COMMUNITY MID 000 BETHANY COMMUNITY MID Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 43 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 800 312 314 315 316 320 324 328 340 348 352 356 358 359 360 362 363 364 368 372 373 376 377 392 396 398 400 408 410 412 K 6 K K 6 K 6 9 K PK K K K K K 6 K K K K 9 6 K 9 6 9 9 6 K 5 8 5 5 8 5 8 12 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 12 8 5 12 8 12 12 8 5 Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No 77.8 86.6 68.4 73.9 80.8 82.2 69.1 68.6 85.8 80.0 71.1 62.8 56.4 74.1 75.4 63.7 74.2 77.5 75.5 58.8 50.3 63.9 73.7 69.9 81.3 68.4 67.8 78.8 77.9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exp Dst NR NR Dst NR Exp Dst NR NR Exm Dst Exp Dst Exp NR NR Exp NR NR NR Exp NR NR Exp Exp NR Exm Dst NR Exp Exp Exp Exp 80A ROWAN ACAD 000 ROWAN ACAD K 5 Yes Yes 36.4 ~ Exm 810 324 326 328 336 348 340 342 344 350 360 9 6 PK 3 K 9 6 K K K 12 8 5 5 2 12 8 5 5 5 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No 59.9 82.3 81.3 68.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Dst NR Exm Dst Exp Exp Exp Exp Dst Exp Dst Exp Dst Exp Dst ROWAN-SALISBURY BOSTIAN ELEM CHARLES ERWIN MID CARROLL T OVERTON CHINA GROVE ELEM CHINA GROVE MID CLEVELAND ELEM CORRIHER LIPE MID EAST ROWAN HS ENOCHVILLE ELEM FAITH ELEM GRANITE QUARRY ELEM H D ISENBERG ELEM E HANFORD DOLE ELEM HURLEY ELEM KNOLLWOOD ELEM KNOX MID LANDIS ELEM MORGAN ELEM MOUNT ULLA ELEM NORTH ROWAN ELEM NORTH ROWAN HS NORTH ROWAN MID ROCKWELL ELEM SALISBURY HS SOUTHEAST MID SOUTH ROWAN HS WEST ROWAN HS WEST ROWAN MID WOODLEAF ELEM RUTHERFORD COUNTY CHASE HS CHASE MID CLIFFSIDE ELEM PAUL L DUNBAR SCHOOL FOREST CITY ELEM EAST RUTHERFORD HS EAST RUTHERFORD MID ELLENBORO ELEM FORREST W HUNT ELEM HARRIS ELEM Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite 65.9 83.1 82.5 80.5 87.3 Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 44 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 810 364 370 378 380 384 388 396 400 K 5 K 5 6 8 K 5 9 12 K 5 K 5 K 5 No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes No No 75.2 78.0 81.0 82.1 65.0 92.0 81.6 78.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR NR Dst NR Exp Dst NR Exm Exc MI Exp Dst NR 81A THOMAS JEFFERSON 000 THOMAS JEFFERSON 7 12 No No 83.3 ~ Dst NR 820 312 320 340 346 347 348 349 350 352 354 364 370 372 376 384 388 SAMPSON COUNTY CHARLES E PERRY ELEM CLEMENT ELEM HARGROVE ELEM HOBBTON ELEM HOBBTON MID HOBBTON HS LAKEWOOD HS MIDWAY ELEM MIDWAY HS MIDWAY MID PLAIN VIEW ELEM UNION MID ROSEBORO-SALEMBURG SALEMBURG ELEM UNION ELEM UNION HS K PK K K 6 9 9 K 9 6 K 6 6 K PK 9 5 5 5 5 8 12 12 5 12 8 5 8 8 5 5 12 No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No 64.0 72.7 71.9 81.4 76.5 61.8 60.5 71.2 60.8 78.0 81.2 73.3 68.2 75.5 78.8 51.9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exm Exp Exp Dst NR Exp Exm NR NR NR Exp Dst NR NR NR Exp Exp 821 304 316 308 320 CLINTON CITY BUTLER AVENUE ELEM LANDON C KERR ELEM CLINTON HS SAMPSON MID 3 PK 9 6 5 2 12 8 Yes Yes No No No No No No 78.6 61.6 76.0 ~ 1 ~ ~ Exp Exp NR NR 830 304 312 320 328 336 344 346 347 SCOTLAND COUNTY CARVER MID COVINGTON STREET I E JOHNSON ELEM LAUREL HILL ELEM N LAURINBURG ELEM PATE GARDNER ELEM SCOTLAND HS SHAW ELEM 6 PK PK PK PK PK 9 4 8 5 5 5 5 5 12 5 No No No Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No 69.2 75.6 63.8 79.2 67.0 65.2 66.6 60.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR NR NR Exp NR NR Exp NR RUTHERFORD COUNTY MOUNT VERNON ELEM PINNACLE ELEM R S MID RUTH ELEM R S CENTRAL RUTHERFORDTON ELEM SPINDALE ELEM SUNSHINE ELEM Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 45 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 830 349 350 356 360 364 6 6 PK PK PK SCOTLAND COUNTY SPRING HILL MID SYCAMORE LANE MID SOUTH SCOTLAND ELEM WAGRAM PRI WASHINGTON PARK ELEM Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status 8 8 5 3 5 Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes 77.1 77.0 82.9 66.0 84.8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp NR Dst NR Exp Exm Dst 83A LAURINBURG CHARTER 000 LAURINBURG CHARTER 9 12 Yes Yes 24.7 ~ Exm MI 83B LAURINBURG HOMEWORK 000 LAURINBURG HOMEWORK 8 12 No No 15.4 ~ LP 840 302 303 304 308 310 312 316 320 324 328 330 332 336 340 344 348 356 358 360 368 STANLY COUNTY ALBEMARLE HS ALBEMARLE MID AQUADALE ELEM BADIN ELEM CENTRAL ELEM ENDY ELEM EAST ALBEMARLE ELEM LOCUST ELEM MILLINGPORT ELEM NEW LONDON ELEM NORTH ALBEMARLE ELEM NORTH STANLY HS NORWOOD ELEM OAKBORO ELEM RICHFIELD ELEM RIDGECREST ELEM SOUTH STANLY HS SOUTH STANLY MID STANFIELD ELEM WEST STANLY HS 9 6 K K K K K K K K PK 9 K K K K 9 6 K 9 12 8 5 8 5 8 5 8 8 8 5 12 5 8 8 8 12 8 8 12 Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes 65.4 72.5 81.8 80.8 63.5 90.2 76.0 80.7 78.5 86.1 65.3 65.3 74.5 84.7 80.5 88.2 64.7 86.8 86.8 78.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp NR Exp Dst Dst NR NR Exm Exc Exm Dst NR NR Dst NR Exm NR NR Exp Dst Exp Dst Dst NR NR Exm Dst Exp Dst Exm 850 304 308 312 314 316 320 328 332 336 338 STOKES COUNTY CHESTNUT GROVE MID FRANCISCO ELEM GERMANTON ELEM MOUNT OLIVE ELEM KING ELEM LAWSONVILLE ELEM NANCY REYNOLDS ELEM N STOKES HS PINE HALL ELEM PINEY GROVE MID 6 PK PK K PK PK K 9 K 6 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 12 5 8 No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 84.1 71.8 84.3 83.7 80.7 82.6 67.9 62.8 82.8 75.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dst NR NR Exp Dst Exp Dst Dst NR Exp Dst NR NR Dst NR NR Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 46 A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 850 340 348 350 352 354 356 358 STOKES COUNTY PINNACLE ELEM SANDY RIDGE ELEM SE STOKES MID SOUTH STOKES HS LONDON ELEM WALNUT COVE ELEM WEST STOKES HS PK K 6 9 K PK 9 5 5 8 12 5 5 12 No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No 70.8 80.3 73.2 51.5 70.3 68.5 65.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp Dst NR NR NR NR Exp 860 302 306 308 312 316 320 324 326 330 332 336 340 348 352 356 360 SURRY COUNTY CEDAR RIDGE ELEM CENTRAL MID COPELAND ELEM DOBSON ELEM EAST SURRY HS FLAT ROCK ELEM FRANKLIN ELEM J SAM GENTRY MID MEADOWVIEW MID MOUNTAIN PARK ELEM NORTH SURRY HS PILOT MOUNTAIN MID SHOALS ELEM SURRY CENTRAL HS WESTFIELD ELEM WHITE PLAINS ELEM K 6 K PK 9 K K 6 6 K 9 6 K 9 K K 6 8 5 5 12 5 5 8 8 5 12 8 5 12 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No No 82.9 86.8 79.9 86.3 67.9 82.8 80.9 84.4 79.7 72.0 66.4 91.1 90.3 76.9 75.8 78.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Dst Exp Dst Exp Exm Dst NR Exp Dst Exp Dst Dst NR NR NR NR Exm Exc Exm Exc Exp Exp NR 861 ELKIN CITY 304 ELKIN ELEM 308 ELKIN HS PK 6 7 12 Yes Yes No No 87.4 80.6 ~ ~ Exp Dst Exp Dst 862 310 308 312 316 3 PK 9 6 5 2 12 8 No No No Yes No No No No 84.4 70.0 90.5 ~ 1 ~ ~ Dst NR NR NR Exp Exc 86A MILLENNIUM CHARTER 000 MILLENNIUM CHARTER K 4 No No 81.2 ~ Dst NR 870 314 318 320 324 9 6 PK PK 12 8 5 5 Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes 71.6 82.4 81.7 89.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Dst NR Exp Dst Exm Dst MOUNT AIRY CITY JONES ELEM B THARRINGTON ELEM MOUNT AIRY HS MOUNT AIRY MID SWAIN COUNTY SWAIN COUNTY HS SWAIN COUNTY MID SWAIN CO EAST ELEM SWAIN CO WEST ELEM Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 47 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 880 304 308 312 318 324 328 330 336 K 5 9 12 6 8 K 5 K 6 9 12 6 8 K 5 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No No 83.5 81.2 94.8 89.3 88.1 85.0 92.4 93.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dst NR Dst NR Exp Exc Exm Dst Exp Dst Exp Dst Exp Exc Dst NR 88A BREVARD ACAD 000 BREVARD ACAD K No No 84.2 ~ Dst NR 890 TYRRELL COUNTY 304 COLUMBIA HS 308 TYRRELL ELEM 6 12 PK 5 Yes No No No 60.2 78.2 ~ ~ Exp NR 900 304 306 308 312 314 316 318 320 332 336 340 344 346 348 350 352 354 356 360 362 364 368 370 372 376 377 PK PK 6 K 6 9 K K K 9 K 9 6 9 6 K K K 9 6 K K K K K 9 Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No 78.5 57.1 70.2 86.0 67.1 60.2 86.5 86.5 72.6 52.0 84.3 72.5 86.8 78.1 89.1 78.8 87.5 95.3 69.2 83.8 78.0 87.9 47.9 79.7 95.4 81.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ Exm NR NR Dst NR NR NR Dst NR Exm Dst Exp Exp Dst NR Exp Exm Dst Exp Dst NR NR Exp Dst Exp Exc NR Dst NR Exp Exm Dst NR NR Exm Exc Dst NR TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY BREVARD ELEM BREVARD HS BREVARD MID PISGAH FOREST ELEM ROSMAN ELEM ROSMAN HS ROSMAN MID T C HENDERSON ELEM UNION COUNTY BENTON HEIGHTS ELEM EAST ELEM EAST UNION MID FAIRVIEW ELEM MONROE MID FOREST HILLS HS HEMBY BRIDGE ELEM INDIAN TRAIL ELEM MARSHVILLE ELEM MONROE HS NEW SALEM ELEM PARKWOOD HS PARKWOOD MID PIEDMONT HS PIEDMONT MID PROSPECT ELEM SARDIS ELEM SHILOH ELEM SUN VALLEY HS SUN VALLEY MID UNION ELEM UNIONVILLE ELEM WALTER BICKETT ELEM WAXHAW ELEM WEDDINGTON ELEM WEDDINGTON HS 8 5 5 8 5 8 12 5 5 5 12 5 12 8 12 8 5 5 5 12 8 5 5 5 5 5 11 Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 48 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 900 378 380 384 388 6 K K K 8 5 5 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 96.1 93.7 85.5 70.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exc Exm Exc Exp Dst Exm 90A UNION ACAD 000 UNION ACAD K 4 No No 84.2 ~ Dst NR 910 304 308 312 314 316 320 340 346 356 360 364 370 376 380 PK PK PK PK 6 6 PK PK PK PK 9 9 PK K 5 5 5 5 8 8 5 5 5 5 12 12 5 5 No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 59.8 67.6 59.6 75.3 58.5 55.6 53.4 73.4 54.2 64.3 39.8 51.0 63.9 83.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp NR NR NR NR NR Exp NR NR LP NR Exp Dst NR 91A VANCE CHARTER SCH 000 VANCE CHARTER SCH K 6 No No 73.3 ~ NR 920 304 308 312 316 318 320 326 328 334 336 340 344 348 352 356 360 362 K 5 K 5 6 8 9 12 9 12 K 5 K 5 K 5 K 5 K 5 K 5 K 5 9 12 K 5 6 8 6 8 K 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No 93.1 93.1 91.9 79.8 78.8 74.7 89.4 93.7 95.0 71.8 89.4 80.2 75.4 85.8 80.4 82.1 81.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exc Exm Exc Exm Exc Exp Exp NR Exm Dst Exm Exc Exm Exc MI Exp Exm Dst Exm Dst MI Exp Exm Dst Exp Dst Dst NR Exp Dst UNION COUNTY WEDDINGTON MID WESLEY CHAPEL ELEM WESTERN UNION ELEM WINGATE ELEM VANCE COUNTY AYCOCK ELEM CARVER ELEM CLARK STREET ELEM DABNEY ELEM EATON-JOHNSON MID HENDERSON MID NEW HOPE ELEM E O YOUNG JR ELEM PINKSTON STREET ELEM ROLLINS ELEM SOUTHERN VANCE HS NORTHERN VANCE HS L B YANCEY ELEM ZEB VANCE ELEM WAKE COUNTY ADAMS ELEM APEX ELEM APEX MID APEX HS ATHENS DRIVE HS AVERSBORO ELEM BAILEYWICK RD ELEM BAUCOM ELEM BRASSFIELD ELEM BRENTWOOD ELEM BRIARCLIFF ELEM BROOKS ELEM NEEDHAM BROUGHTON HS BUGG ELEM CARNAGE MID CARROLL MID CARVER ELEM Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 49 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) 920 364 368 370 376 380 384 388 390 391 393 394 396 398 399 400 404 408 410 411 412 414 415 416 420 424 428 436 439 440 441 442 446 447 448 452 454 456 460 464 468 469 470 471 472 473 476 480 484 488 Grade Span WAKE COUNTY CARY ELEM K 5 CARY HS 9 12 CENTENNIAL CAMPUS 6 8 COMBS ELEM K 5 CONN ELEM K 5 CREECH ROAD ELEM K 5 DANIELS MID 6 8 DAVIS DRIVE ELEM K 5 DAVIS DRIVE MID 6 8 DILLARD DRIVE ELEM K 5 DILLARD DRIVE MID 6 8 DOUGLAS ELEM K 5 DURANT ROAD ELEM PK 5 DURANT ROAD MID 6 8 EAST CARY MID 6 8 EAST GARNER MID 6 8 E MILLBROOK MID 6 8 EAST WAKE MID 6 8 EAST WAKE HS 9 12 WILLIAM G ENLOE HS 9 12 FARMINGTON WOODS ELEM K 5 FOX ROAD ELEM K 5 FULLER ELEM K 5 FUQUAY-VARINA ELEM K 5 FUQUAY-VARINA MID 6 8 FUQUAY-VARINA HS 9 12 GARNER HS 9 12 GREEN HOPE ELEM K 5 GREEN ELEM K 5 GREEN HOPE HS 9 11 HILBURN DRIVE ELEM K 5 HODGE ROAD ELEM K 5 HOLLY SPRINGS ELEM K 5 HUNTER ELEM K 5 JEFFREYS GROVE ELEM K 5 JONES DAIRY ELEM K 5 JOYNER ELEM K 5 KINGSWOOD ELEM K 5 KNIGHTDALE ELEM K 5 LACY ELEM K 5 LEESVILLE ROAD ELEM K 5 LEAD MINE ELEM K 5 LEESVILLE ROAD MID 6 8 LIGON MID 6 8 LEESVILLE ROAD HS 9 12 LINCOLN HEIGHTS ELEM K 5 LOCKHART ELEM K 5 LUFKIN ROAD MID 6 7 LYNN ROAD ELEM K 5 Growth Expected Exemplary Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Performance Composite 77.7 79.1 81.9 94.0 77.3 80.3 85.9 97.5 93.3 88.3 87.7 84.5 94.8 91.5 86.9 77.3 79.3 75.9 66.1 76.1 86.2 86.6 79.8 83.0 82.7 69.6 64.0 97.7 90.7 84.9 86.3 76.2 86.1 84.6 87.3 91.1 81.5 94.1 77.8 86.6 93.4 86.7 90.2 91.2 85.0 87.3 88.1 94.4 81.7 Spec. Cond. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 50 Status Exp Exm Dst NR Exm Exc Exm Exm Dst Exp Dst Exm Exc Exm Exc Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exc Exm Exc Exm Dst Exm NR Exp Exm Exp Exm Dst Exp Dst NR Exm Dst Dst NR Exp Exp Exm Exc Exm Exc Exm Dst MI Exm Dst Exp Exp Dst Exp Dst Exm Dst Exp Exc Exm Dst Exm Exc Exp Exm Dst Exm Exc MI Exm Dst Exm Exc Exp Exc Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exc Exp Dst A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 920 492 494 496 500 504 512 516 520 522 523 524 525 530 531 532 536 540 542 544 548 550 552 560 562 564 568 570 572 576 580 584 588 592 593 594 595 596 598 600 604 606 607 608 616 618 620 624 626 628 6 K PK 9 K 6 K K K K K K K K K K K K PK K K 9 K 9 K K K K K K K 9 6 K 6 9 K K K 6 PK 6 6 K K K K K K WAKE COUNTY MARTIN MID MIDDLE CREEK ELEM MILLBROOK ELEM MILLBROOK HS MORRISVILLE ELEM NORTH GARNER MID NORTH RIDGE ELEM NORTHWOODS ELEM OAK GROVE ELEM OLIVE CHAPEL ELEM OLDS ELEM PARTNERSHIP ELEM PENNY ROAD ELEM PLEASANT UNION ELEM POE ELEM POWELL ELEM RAND ROAD ELEM REEDY CREEK ELEM ROLESVILLE ELEM ROOT ELEM SALEM ELEM SANDERSON HS SMITH ELEM SOUTHEAST RALEIGH HS STOUGH ELEM SWIFT CREEK ELEM TIMBER DRIVE ELEM UNDERWOOD ELEM VANCE ELEM VANDORA SPRINGS ELEM WAKE FOREST ELEM WAKE F-ROLESVILLE HS WAKE F-ROLESVILLE MID WAKEFIELD ELEM WAKEFIELD MID WAKEFIELD HS WASHINGTON ELEM WEATHERSTONE ELEM WENDELL ELEM WEST CARY MID WEST LAKE ELEM WEST LAKE MID WEST MILLBROOK MID WILBURN ELEM WILDWOOD FOREST ELEM WILEY ELEM WILLOW SPRINGS ELEM YATES MILL ELEM YORK ELEM 8 5 5 12 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 12 5 12 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 12 8 6 7 11 5 5 5 8 5 8 8 5 4 5 5 5 5 Growth Expected Exemplary Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Performance Composite 86.9 81.5 79.0 73.9 96.7 68.5 93.1 90.6 95.0 92.2 86.9 84.5 88.9 93.2 81.0 78.1 73.1 88.5 77.2 87.7 90.9 77.7 79.9 73.0 89.6 76.7 91.8 74.0 83.1 89.0 84.5 73.2 82.4 88.5 86.6 82.3 87.0 95.3 77.4 90.5 94.7 93.9 88.9 85.7 81.9 78.7 89.6 88.4 84.9 Spec. Cond. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 51 Status Exp Dst Exm Dst MI Exp Exm MI Exm Exc NR Exm Exc Exp Exc Exm Exc Exm Exc Dst NR Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Exc Exp Dst Exp Exp Exm Dst Exp Exm Dst Exm Exc Exm Exm Exp Exp Dst NR Exm Exc Exp Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst NR Exp Dst Exm Dst Exm Dst Exp Dst Exm Exc Exp Exp Exc Exm Exc Exm Exc Exm Dst Exm Dst Exp Dst Exm Exm Dst Exp Dst Dst NR A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 920 WAKE COUNTY 632 ZEBULON ELEM 636 ZEBULON MID K 6 5 8 No Yes No No 79.5 78.8 ~ ~ NR Exp 92B EXPLORIS MID SCH 000 EXPLORIS 6 8 Yes Yes 96.5 ~ Exm Exc 92D MAGELLAN CHARTER 000 MAGELLAN CHARTER 4 8 Yes Yes 99.2 ~ Exm Exc 92E STERLING MONTESSORI 000 STERLING MONTESSORI K 8 No No 76.8 ~ NR 92F FRANKLIN ACAD 000 FRANKLIN ACAD K 6 No No 82.5 ~ Dst NR 92G EAST WAKE ACAD 000 EAST WAKE ACAD K 9 No No 76.2 ~ NR 92I SPARC ACAD 000 SPARC ACAD PK 8 No No 47.6 * NR 92K RALEIGH CHARTER HS 000 RALEIGH CHARTER HS 9 10 Yes Yes 92.7 ~ Exm Exc MI 92L NE RALEIGH CHTR ACAD 000 NE RALEIGH CHTR ACAD K No No 39.8 * NR 92N QUEST ACAD 000 QUEST ACAD 1 12 Yes Yes 93.5 ~ Exm Exc MI 92P COMMUNITY PARTNERS 000 COMMUNITY PARTNERS 9 12 No No 49.2 * NR 930 330 340 344 348 K K K K No No Yes No No No No No 64.6 62.0 60.8 73.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ NR NR Exp NR WARREN COUNTY MARIAM BOYD ELEM NORTHSIDE ELEM SOUTH WARREN ELEM VAUGHAN ELEM 5 5 5 5 5 Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 52 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. 930 WARREN COUNTY 352 WARREN COUNTY HS 354 WARREN COUNTY MID 9 12 6 8 No No No No 42.0 60.9 ~ ~ LP NR 93A HALIWA-SAPONI TRIBAL 000 HALIWA-SAPONI TRIBAL K 5 No No 52.3 ~ NR 940 306 308 314 316 328 WASHINGTON COUNTY CRESWELL ELEM CRESWELL HS PINES ELEM PLYMOUTH HS WASHINGTON CO UNION PK 7 PK 9 5 6 12 4 12 8 No Yes No Yes No No No No No No 55.4 52.7 49.6 38.3 58.0 ~ ~ * ~ ~ NR Exp NR Exp NR 950 308 312 316 320 322 324 328 332 336 WATAUGA COUNTY BETHEL ELEM BLOWING ROCK ELEM COVE CREEK ELEM GREEN VALLEY ELEM HARDIN PARK ELEM MABEL ELEM PARKWAY ELEM VALLE CRUCIS ELEM WATAUGA HS PK K PK K PK PK PK K 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No No 82.7 95.4 92.8 91.2 93.5 86.1 94.7 91.8 76.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Dst Exp Exc Exp Exc Exm Exc Exm Exc Exm Dst Exp Exc Exp Exc Exp 960 312 314 316 318 324 326 329 330 331 334 335 336 337 340 344 348 360 370 372 374 WAYNE COUNTY BROGDEN MID BROGDEN PRI CARVER ELEM CARVER HEIGHTS/EDISON CHARLES B AYCOCK HS DILLARD EDISON JUNIOR EASTERN WAYNE ELEM EASTERN WAYNE HS EASTERN WAYNE MID FREMONT ELEM GOLDSBORO HS GRANTHAM GOLDSBORO MID GREENWOOD MID MEADOW LANE ELEM MOUNT OLIVE MID NORWAYNE MID ROSEWOOD ELEM ROSEWOOD HS ROSEWOOD MID 5 K K K 9 6 K 9 6 K 9 K 6 5 K 6 6 K 9 6 8 4 5 5 12 8 5 12 8 5 12 8 8 8 4 8 8 5 12 8 No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No 57.3 70.7 64.0 57.8 64.0 56.3 80.7 71.4 84.8 77.3 43.5 79.8 66.3 82.5 83.4 67.8 79.6 82.7 65.3 86.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp Exp Exm Exp NR Exp Dst Exp Dst NR Exp Exp Exp NR Dst NR Exm Dst NR NR Exp Dst Exm Dst NR Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 53 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 960 376 380 382 386 388 390 450 454 K 5 9 12 K 5 6 12 K 5 K 5 K 5 K 5 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No 55.2 64.1 85.1 73.1 86.7 64.8 84.5 90.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp Exm Exm Dst NR Exp Dst Exp Exp Dst Exp Exc 96C DILLARD ACAD 000 DILLARD ACAD K 3 No No 37.9 * NR 96D WAYNE TECH ACAD 000 WAYNE TECH ACAD 9 12 No No 5.8 ~ LP 970 308 310 312 315 320 324 336 338 340 344 348 352 356 360 368 370 376 380 388 390 392 PK K K 6 9 PK 4 K PK PK K K 9 PK K PK PK PK 9 9 K 5 8 5 8 12 5 8 3 5 8 8 8 12 5 8 8 8 8 12 12 5 Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 78.7 79.0 77.6 80.8 68.8 80.0 85.2 85.4 76.9 81.2 83.1 77.9 72.5 79.2 76.7 85.3 81.1 83.8 67.8 69.9 86.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exp NR Exp Dst NR NR Dst NR Dst NR Dst NR Exp Exp Dst Dst NR NR Exp NR Exp Exp Dst Dst NR Dst NR NR Exp Exp Dst 97D BRIDGES CHARTER SCH 000 BRIDGES CHARTER SCH K 8 No No 68.5 ~ NR 980 WILSON COUNTY 308 B O BARNES ELEM 317 DARDEN-VICK MID K 6 5 8 No No No No 71.0 68.9 ~ ~ NR NR WAYNE COUNTY SCH STREET ELEM SOUTHERN WAYNE HS SPRING CREEK ELEM SPRING CREEK HS TOMMYS ROAD ELEM NORTH DRIVE ELEM NORTHEAST ELEM NORTHWEST ELEM WILKES COUNTY BOOMER-FERGUSON ELEM C B ELLER ELEM C C WRIGHT ELEM J F WOODWARD MID EAST WILKES HS FAIRPLAINS ELEM MILLERS CREEK INT MILLERS CREEK PRI MORAVIAN FALLS ELEM MT PLEASANT ELEM MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEM MULBERRY ELEM NORTH WILKES HS N WILKESBORO ELEM ROARING RIVER ELEM RONDA-CLINGMAN ELEM TRAPHILL ELEM UNION ELEM/MID WEST WILKES HS WILKES CENTRAL HS WILKESBORO ELEM Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 54 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 980 318 320 324 336 338 340 342 348 352 356 357 360 364 380 384 388 390 392 396 400 9 12 K 5 6 8 9 12 6 8 K 5 9 12 K 5 K 5 K 5 K 5 K 5 K 5 6 8 6 8 K 5 6 8 K 5 K 5 K 5 No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No 51.9 79.5 81.7 60.4 80.0 89.0 63.6 88.3 86.6 62.5 62.1 91.6 82.0 81.0 87.4 84.9 83.3 84.8 86.1 72.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR Exp Exp Dst Exp Dst NR Exp Dst NR Exp Dst Exm Dst NR NR Exm Exc Exm Dst Dst NR Exp Dst Exp Dst Dst NR Exp Dst Exm Dst NR 98A SALLIE B. HOWARD 000 SALLIE B HOWARD K 7 Yes No 60.1 ~ Exp 990 304 308 312 316 320 322 324 326 328 336 YADKIN COUNTY BOONVILLE ELEM COURTNEY ELEM EAST BEND ELEM FALL CREEK ELEM FORBUSH ELEM FORBUSH HS JONESVILLE ELEM STARMOUNT HS WEST YADKIN ELEM YADKINVILLE ELEM K K K PK PK 9 PK 9 K K 8 8 8 8 8 12 8 12 8 8 No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No 78.4 75.0 73.0 86.2 84.2 64.9 83.5 60.5 82.1 77.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NR NR NR Exm Dst Exp Dst Exp Exp Dst Exp Exp Dst Exp 995 304 308 312 316 320 324 328 330 336 YANCEY COUNTY BALD CREEK ELEM BEE LOG ELEM BURNSVILLE ELEM CANE RIVER MID CLEARMONT ELEM EAST YANCEY MID MICAVILLE ELEM MOUNTAIN HERITAGE HS SOUTH TOE ELEM K 5 K 5 K 5 6 8 K 5 6 8 K 5 9 12 K 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes 73.1 95.4 90.7 88.0 85.9 92.5 83.3 73.1 92.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Exm Exm Exc MI Exp Exc Exm Dst Exm Dst Exp Exc Exm Dst NR Exm Exc MI WILSON COUNTY BEDDINGFIELD HS ELM CITY ELEM ELM CITY MID FIKE HS FOREST HILLS MID GARDNERS ELEM JAMES HUNT HS LEE WOODARD ELEM LUCAMA ELEM MARGARET HEARNE ELEM MILTON M DANIELS ELEM NEW HOPE ELEM ROCK RIDGE ELEM SPEIGHT MID SPRINGFIELD MID STANTONSBURG ELEM TOISNOT MID VINSON-BYNUM ELEM WELLS ELEM WINSTEAD ELEM Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 55 Status A Report Card for the ABCs of Public Education Volume I: 2000-2001 Growth and Performance of Public Schools in North Carolina Growth and Performance of Schools System and School(s) Grade Span 997 202 203 204 UN GR K 8 UN GR No Yes Yes No Yes No UN GR No No HEALTH & HUMAN SVCS EASTERN NC SCH DEAF GOV. MOREHEAD SCH NC SCH DEAF MORGANTON 998 JUVENILE JUSTICE 704 JUVENILE EVAL CTR Growth Expected Exemplary Performance Composite Spec. Cond. Status 11.2 43.1 20.0 ~ ~ ~ LP Exm MI Exp 13.6 ~ LP Status: Exp-Expected Growth; Exm-Exemplary Growth; Exc-School of Excellence; Dst-School of Distinction; MI-25 Most Improved K-8 Schools; 10 Most Improved High Schools; LP-Low-performing; NR-No Recognition EE-Excessive Exclusions; 98R-Less than 98% tested; 95R-Less than 95% tested Special Conditions: 1-K-2 Feeder; 2-Senior High (Gr 9-12); 3-Senior High (Gr 10-12); 9-School did not meet data requirements; *Confidence Interval Applied; ~ No Special Conditions Growth and Performance of Schools Page 56
