In-Class Assignment #1: Document Analysis The following is only a suggested framework to help you generate materials for this in-class assignment. These items and questions are elements to consider while you plan your analytical strategy. They do not encompass the entire field of questions that might be asked about a document, nor is it necessary that you address all of these questions. However, it would be useful to remember that thoroughness is at least one of the grading criteria. Other key criteria will be the organization, style, readability, consistency, accuracy, and the mechanical correctness of your response. As you construct your response, you may only have your document and this assignment sheet open for examination. You may not use your text, class notes, or have email or the Internet open while you work. You may, however, put cryptic notes on the document itself before and during class. The minimum required response is 500 words of body text. Context Describe the context in which you found or received the document. Is it a brochure you picked up out of a rack? Do you think the creators of the document considered the context in which you encountered it? What about the document makes you think they did or didn’t consider these things? Usability/Readability These two words--readability and usability—do not have congruous meanings; however, they often share some overlapping boundaries. While a document might be very readable, it might contain any number of obstacles that hinder its usability. In contrast, if a document is not readable, it is a fairly safe assumption it will not be useable. Here are some questions along these lines to consider: If the item is a brochure, do you encounter the information in what seems to be a logical order as you unfold the document? Does the document use meaningful headings (and do you in discussing it?) which help guide you through the information, or do you seem to need a pick and shovel to be able to dig the necessary information out? Accessibility and usability are both appropriate terms here. Is the language appropriate for what seems to be the target audience? Audience Are there any inferences you can make about the audience for whom this document is intended? Do you think the writers did or did not carefully consider these things? What evidence is there that validates your position? Visual Elements The visual elements of a document cover a very wide range of possibilities. Here are some elements that should yield some discussion: Size and shape—does it have anything to do with what the document is trying to accomplish? Does it seem to be typical of the medium or genre in which the document is participating? Texture—Is the paper heavy or thin, smooth or rough, glossy or matte finish? Does the choice seem to be a conscious one? If so, why? How might this affect the usability of the document? White Space—This trait affects the document’s accessibility and aesthetics. Is the document crowded or visually intimidating? Or is it well-designed, making effective use of white space? Contrast, Repetition, Alignment, and Proximity—How do these elements positively or negatively impact the document’s mission? Is there a conscious visual organization to the document? Typography—Including font, type size, weight, bolding, and italics—Do these choices seem to be arbitrary or carefully considered? Ethos, Logos, and Pathos How does the document make use of these appeals? Do the writers seem to have ignored something in constructing their argument? Do they do a particularly good/bad job with one appeal and not another? Does it use sufficient essential details to flesh out these appeals? The 7 C’s Does the document satisfy the requirements of all 7 C’s—Clear, Correct, Concise, Consistent, Complete, Correct, and Coherent? Actionable Items Does the document give the users sufficient and accessible means to act based on the document’s use? Did the writers miss some golden opportunities? Remember, save frequently, substantiate your claims with SED’s, don’t wait too late to print, and attach your document to your response.