DRAFT Through-Grade Assessment Model: Proof of Concept Study 2015–16 Dr. Nancy Carolan, Ms. Hope Lung NC Department of Public Instruction Collaborative Conference on Student Achievement March 2016 Proof of Concept Study Purposes and Design 2 Purposes–Grades 3-8 Valid and reliable measures of content standards Growth data for educator effectiveness reports Assessments throughout the year that inform and guide instruction and that may predict performance on future assessments Conduct research 3 Research Questions Determine the feasibility of implementing the concept across grades 3–8 Do interim results provide teachers and students with useful information to inform and improve the delivery of instruction? Will interim assessments predict performance on the end-ofyear test? Does the structure of the content standards require adjusting design of the through-grade model? Is it feasible to incorporate constructed-response items or writing prompts on the interim assessments? 4 15-16 Proof of Concept Design Students take 3 interim assessments during the school year The interim assessments are not included in accountability calculations Students take a shortened end-of-year test End-of-grade test without embedded field test items The modified end-of-year test is included in accountability calculations 5 15-16 Grades 3-8 Concept Design Interim 1 Interim 2 Interim 3 End-of-Year (Assess entire year) Note: Design could be altered based on outcome of study 6 Timeline Based on Current Design Year Administration 2015–16 Proof of Concept (sample population) Grade Levels Grade 5: Math Grade 6: ELA/Reading 2016–17 Field Test (sample population) Or Release RFP for assessment Grades 3–8: Math Grades 4–8: ELA/Reading 2017–18 Pilot Operational Year (statewide) Grades 3–8: Math Grades 4–8: ELA/Reading Purpose Determine feasibility of concept Summer 2016: Decision-point of how to proceed Test items for inclusion in operational test forms Full Implementation 7 Proof of Concept Study Sample and Specifications 8 Sample―Grades 5 and 6 • Grade 5 Math — 45 schools, 4,021 students • Grade 6 ELA/Reading ― 35 schools, 4,859 students • Generalizable to the entire state • Stratified random sample pulled based on variables • Demographic variables: region, ethnicity, gender, economically disadvantaged • School-level achievement variable: mean scale score • Notification sent July 13, 2015 9 Interim Assessments―Test Specifications Test specification development is step 2 in the test development process Meetings held late June and early July Invitees selected by NCDPI Curriculum and Instruction Mathematics and ELA Active grade 5 Math and grade 6 ELA classroom teachers, instructional coaches, and LEA curriculum and instruction leaders First half of meeting―Training by NCDPI Curriculum and Instruction Second half of meeting—NCDPI Test Development collected feedback and recommendations Test Development team discusses teacher recommendations with NCDPI Curriculum and Instruction to finalize test specifications https://center.ncsu.edu/ncaccount/ Feedback will be collected from sampled schools throughout the year 10 Interim Design—Grade 5 Math • Calculator active and inactive sections • 25 Items • 21 multiple-choice items (8 calc. inactive, 13 calc. active) • 4 gridded-response items (calc. inactive) • Interim 1: NBT.2, NBT.5, MD.5.b, MD.5.c • Interim 2: NF.1, NF.2, NF.3, NBT.6, NBT.7 (addition and subtraction) • Interim 3: NF.2, NF.4 a & b, NF.6, NF.7 a, b & c, NBT.7 • Assessment Specification documents https://center.ncsu.edu/ncaccount/ • Answer sheets scanned and reports distributed by the LEA Test Coordinator 11 Interim Design—Grade 6 ELA • Standards assessed on each ELA interim assessment RL.1, RL.2, RL.3, RL.4, RL.5, L.4a, L.5.a RI.1, RI.2, RI.3, RI.4, RI.5, RI.6, RI.8 ELA Interim Number of Poetry Selections Number of Number of ~ Lexile Range Informational Literature Informational and Selections Selections Literature Selections Interim 1 1 1 1 880L–980L Interim 2 0 1 2 900L–1050L Interim 3 0 2 1 980L–1230L 12 Interim Design—Grade 6 ELA ELA Interim Number of MC Items* Number of CR Items* Total Total Number Number of of Score Items Points Interim 1 20 0 20 20 Interim 2 19 1 20 22 Interim 3 19 1 20 22 *Multiple-choice (MC), constructed response (CR) CR item is short-answer and can typically be answered in a paragraph or less. Students will respond to text. Lines are provided on the answer sheet. Answer sheets returned to the LEA Test Coordinator (TC) to be shipped for central scoring, reports returned within 8 days LEA TC will return the answer sheets with student responses to teachers 13 Interim Design—Math and ELA Paper/pencil only to ensure participation Up to 90 minutes maximum test administration time Items pulled from the end-of-grade item pool (if available) Assessment Specification documents https://center.ncsu.edu/ncaccount/ May need to create a new NC Education account to access 14 Proof of Concept Study Policy and Administration 15 Interim Assessment Policy Testing Windows (3) Interim 1 October 1–30, 2015 Interim 2 December 8, 2015–January 22, 2016 Interim 3 March 3–31, 2016 Districts/charters can determine the testing days within the designated windows Interims are not required to be administered to all students on same day, but should be administered within the same week Make-up administrations are optional but strongly recommended Should be administered by the classroom teacher Proctors are not required Administration does not require the removal of displays 16 Interim Assessment Policy Eligibility Mathematics Grade 5 All students enrolled in grade 5 at sampled schools who participate in the EOG mathematics assessment English Language Arts/Reading Grade 6 All students enrolled in grade 6 at sampled schools who participate in the EOG English Language Arts/ reading assessment Both Transfer students−−Take the interim(s) and the modified end-ofgrade (EOG) test No opt out 17 Interim Assessment Policy Students Not Eligible to Participate Students with disabilities whose IEP documents participation in the NCEXTEND1 alternate assessment LEP students who scored below Level 4.0 Expanding on the W-APT and are in their first year in U.S. schools are not eligible to participate in the grade 6 ELA study, but they are eligible to participate in the grade 5 math study Students who are granted a medical exception from the Division of Accountability Services for the EOG assessments 18 Interim Assessment Policy Accommodations IEP, 504, and/or LEP teams do not have to reconvene and document the accommodations for the Proof of Concept Studies. Students may use the accommodations that are specified on their current IEPs, Section 504 Plans, or LEP documentation for the EOG for the modified end-of-year test. Instructional accommodations may be used for the interims except for the Read Aloud and Signing/Cueing accommodations for grade 6 ELA/Reading. Reading aloud or signing/cueing the selections, questions, or answer choices invalidates results because the interims measure reading skills. 19 Interim Assessment Policy Special Print Versions Braille, Large Print (LP), One Item Per Page (OIPP), and Large Print One Item Per Page Editions (LP/OIPP) can be ordered from TNN Accommodation Notification Request Forms for special print versions do not need to be sent in for interim assessments Submit orders at least 30 working days before the actual administration date 20 Interim Assessment Policy Materials Assessment Guide – guide for interims (separate guides: 1 for ELA/Reading; 1 for Math) – guide for end-of year (separate guides: 1 for ELA/Reading; 1 for Math) Answer sheets Test books (separate test books for the subjects) 21 Interim Assessment Policy Required Supplemental Materials English Language Arts/Reading Blank paper Mathematics Blank paper Graph paper (auto shipped for interims and end-of-year) Calculators – Any four-function calculator with memory key 22 Interim Assessment Policy Security Assessment guides are not secure test materials Store at the school until all interims have been administered, then securely destroy Following the administration, interim assessment booklets are to be kept at the schools for 4 weeks, then securely destroyed Booklets must remain in the school Booklets should be accounted for at all times Local decision where booklets are stored at the school (not accessible to students) Teachers should use the booklets with students in reviews Parents may view the booklets only within the school setting. The teacher may share with parents the student’s scores on the items through customary communication (i.e., individual parent/teacher conferences at the school) Interim assessments (booklets, items, content) cannot be shared with other schools 23 Modified End-of-Grade Summative Assessments for Concept Study Participants 24 Summative Test Design— Concept Study • Administered to proof of concept interim assessment sample • Also administered to a “control” sample of schools that did not take the interim assessments • The modified end-of-grade (EOG) is a version of the EOG test without the embedded field test items • Operational items are the same as the EOG administered statewide 25 Summative Test Policy— Concept Study End-of-Year assessments follow the same guidelines as the End-ofGrade Assessments – Multiple forms – Test window – Test security – Supplemental materials – Paper/pencil administrations only – Submit accommodation notification forms – Scanned locally – Reporting – Scores included in accountability calculations 26 Proof of Concept Study Reporting 27 Analyze and Interpret Interim Assessment Results • What went well/what needs work (content and instruction) • Observe patterns • Formulate inferences/verify inferences • Draw conclusions which may lead to changes in assessment or instruction 28 Use of Interim Assessment Results • Identify students who may need intervention prior to additional assessments • Data can be used to focus future instruction based on student needs High-quality corrective instruction Enrichment activities • Plan opportunities for students to show a new level of understanding during instruction 29 ELA/Reading Grade 6 Class Roster Class Rosters Mathematics Grade 5 Class Roster ELA/Reading Grade 6 Class Goal/Subscore Roster Individual Student Report Mathematics Grade 5 Class Goal/Subscore Roster Individual Student Report Individual Student Report ELA/Reading Grade 6 Class Item Report Individual Student Report Mathematics Grade 5 Class Item Report Class Item Report ELA/Reading Grade 6 Class Item Report Mathematics Grade 5 Class Item Report Mathematics Grade 5 Class Item Report Item Number 7 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 18 Correct Answer A D C B A B C D B Student 1 A D C B A D A B C Student 2 A D A B A B B D B Student 3 A D C B A B C D C Student 4 B D C B A B C D A Student 5 B D B B A D C A D Student 6 B D C B A B A A A Student 7 B D A B C D A D B Student 8 A D C B A B C D B Student 9 B D C B C B C A B Student 10 B C B B C C D C A Student 11 A D C B A B B A B Student 12 A C C B A B B D D Student 13 B D C B B B B A B Student 14 A D A B A D B C D Student 15 A D C B A B C D B *This is not actual data. The slide is for training purposes only. Proof of Concept Study Professional Development and Communication 42 NCDPI/Curriculum and Instruction • English Language Arts Grade 6 • Held three webinars • August 19 - Standards Study • August 20 -Text Complexity • October 22 • www.edmodo.com Code:2d93zp • Math Grade 5 • Held three face-to-face meetings in August, 2015 • Teachers preferred • Travel reimbursed and CEUs granted • NCDPI Mathematics Wiki: http://maccess.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Home 43 NCDPI/Accountability Services • Held 6 webinars between July 13 and October 29, 2015 • Email list • Proof of Concept Page on NC Education • • • • • • • https://center.ncsu.edu/ncaccount Assessment Brief Frequently Asked Questions Talking Points Gridded Response Practice Activity (shipped prior to Interim 1) Sample Answer Sheets and Reports Interim 2 ELA/Reading Constructed Response Item Scoring Rubric • Monthly updates provide to the NC State Board of Education 44 Proof of Concept Study Stakeholder Input 45 Surveys and Observations • Surveys are distributed for each interim assessment administration • • • • Parent (link provided on student report) Teacher LEA test coordinator Report turn around time • Administration observations • Testing Policy and Operations • Regional Accountability Coordinators 46 Proof of Concept Study Resources 47 NC Education Page Use the following link to access presentations, memos and resources https://center.ncsu.edu/ncaccount 48 Questions? 49 DRAFT Through-Grade Assessment Model: Proof of Concept Study 2015–16 Dr. Nancy Carolan, Ms. Hope Lung NC Department of Public Instruction Collaborative Conference on Student Achievement March 2016 Proof of Concept Study Purposes and Design 2 Purposes–Grades 3-8 Valid and reliable measures of content standards Growth data for educator effectiveness reports Assessments throughout the year that inform and guide instruction and that may predict performance on future assessments Conduct research 3 Research Questions Determine the feasibility of implementing the concept across grades 3–8 Do interim results provide teachers and students with useful information to inform and improve the delivery of instruction? Will interim assessments predict performance on the end-ofyear test? Does the structure of the content standards require adjusting design of the through-grade model? Is it feasible to incorporate constructed-response items or writing prompts on the interim assessments? 4 15-16 Proof of Concept Design Students take 3 interim assessments during the school year The interim assessments are not included in accountability calculations Students take a shortened end-of-year test End-of-grade test without embedded field test items The modified end-of-year test is included in accountability calculations 5 15-16 Grades 3-8 Concept Design Interim 1 Interim 2 Interim 3 End-of-Year (Assess entire year) Note: Design could be altered based on outcome of study 6 Timeline Based on Current Design Year Administration 2015–16 Proof of Concept (sample population) Grade Levels Grade 5: Math Grade 6: ELA/Reading 2016–17 Field Test (sample population) Or Release RFP for assessment Grades 3–8: Math Grades 4–8: ELA/Reading 2017–18 Pilot Operational Year (statewide) Grades 3–8: Math Grades 4–8: ELA/Reading Purpose Determine feasibility of concept Summer 2016: Decision-point of how to proceed Test items for inclusion in operational test forms Full Implementation 7 Proof of Concept Study Sample and Specifications 8 Sample―Grades 5 and 6 • Grade 5 Math — 45 schools, 4,021 students • Grade 6 ELA/Reading ― 35 schools, 4,859 students • Generalizable to the entire state • Stratified random sample pulled based on variables • Demographic variables: region, ethnicity, gender, economically disadvantaged • School-level achievement variable: mean scale score • Notification sent July 13, 2015 9 Interim Assessments―Test Specifications Test specification development is step 2 in the test development process Meetings held late June and early July Invitees selected by NCDPI Curriculum and Instruction Mathematics and ELA Active grade 5 Math and grade 6 ELA classroom teachers, instructional coaches, and LEA curriculum and instruction leaders First half of meeting―Training by NCDPI Curriculum and Instruction Second half of meeting—NCDPI Test Development collected feedback and recommendations Test Development team discusses teacher recommendations with NCDPI Curriculum and Instruction to finalize test specifications https://center.ncsu.edu/ncaccount/ Feedback will be collected from sampled schools throughout the year 10 Interim Design—Grade 5 Math • Calculator active and inactive sections • 25 Items • 21 multiple-choice items (8 calc. inactive, 13 calc. active) • 4 gridded-response items (calc. inactive) • Interim 1: NBT.2, NBT.5, MD.5.b, MD.5.c • Interim 2: NF.1, NF.2, NF.3, NBT.6, NBT.7 (addition and subtraction) • Interim 3: NF.2, NF.4 a & b, NF.6, NF.7 a, b & c, NBT.7 • Assessment Specification documents https://center.ncsu.edu/ncaccount/ • Answer sheets scanned and reports distributed by the LEA Test Coordinator 11 Interim Design—Grade 6 ELA • Standards assessed on each ELA interim assessment RL.1, RL.2, RL.3, RL.4, RL.5, L.4a, L.5.a RI.1, RI.2, RI.3, RI.4, RI.5, RI.6, RI.8 ELA Interim Number of Poetry Selections Number of Number of ~ Lexile Range Informational Literature Informational and Selections Selections Literature Selections Interim 1 1 1 1 880L–980L Interim 2 0 1 2 900L–1050L Interim 3 0 2 1 980L–1230L 12 Interim Design—Grade 6 ELA ELA Interim Number of MC Items* Number of CR Items* Total Total Number Number of of Score Items Points Interim 1 20 0 20 20 Interim 2 19 1 20 22 Interim 3 19 1 20 22 *Multiple-choice (MC), constructed response (CR) CR item is short-answer and can typically be answered in a paragraph or less. Students will respond to text. Lines are provided on the answer sheet. Answer sheets returned to the LEA Test Coordinator (TC) to be shipped for central scoring, reports returned within 8 days LEA TC will return the answer sheets with student responses to teachers 13 Interim Design—Math and ELA Paper/pencil only to ensure participation Up to 90 minutes maximum test administration time Items pulled from the end-of-grade item pool (if available) Assessment Specification documents https://center.ncsu.edu/ncaccount/ May need to create a new NC Education account to access 14 Proof of Concept Study Policy and Administration 15 Interim Assessment Policy Testing Windows (3) Interim 1 October 1–30, 2015 Interim 2 December 8, 2015–January 22, 2016 Interim 3 March 3–31, 2016 Districts/charters can determine the testing days within the designated windows Interims are not required to be administered to all students on same day, but should be administered within the same week Make-up administrations are optional but strongly recommended Should be administered by the classroom teacher Proctors are not required Administration does not require the removal of displays 16 Interim Assessment Policy Eligibility Mathematics Grade 5 All students enrolled in grade 5 at sampled schools who participate in the EOG mathematics assessment English Language Arts/Reading Grade 6 All students enrolled in grade 6 at sampled schools who participate in the EOG English Language Arts/ reading assessment Both Transfer students−−Take the interim(s) and the modified end-ofgrade (EOG) test No opt out 17 Interim Assessment Policy Students Not Eligible to Participate Students with disabilities whose IEP documents participation in the NCEXTEND1 alternate assessment LEP students who scored below Level 4.0 Expanding on the W-APT and are in their first year in U.S. schools are not eligible to participate in the grade 6 ELA study, but they are eligible to participate in the grade 5 math study Students who are granted a medical exception from the Division of Accountability Services for the EOG assessments 18 Interim Assessment Policy Accommodations IEP, 504, and/or LEP teams do not have to reconvene and document the accommodations for the Proof of Concept Studies. Students may use the accommodations that are specified on their current IEPs, Section 504 Plans, or LEP documentation for the EOG for the modified end-of-year test. Instructional accommodations may be used for the interims except for the Read Aloud and Signing/Cueing accommodations for grade 6 ELA/Reading. Reading aloud or signing/cueing the selections, questions, or answer choices invalidates results because the interims measure reading skills. 19 Interim Assessment Policy Special Print Versions Braille, Large Print (LP), One Item Per Page (OIPP), and Large Print One Item Per Page Editions (LP/OIPP) can be ordered from TNN Accommodation Notification Request Forms for special print versions do not need to be sent in for interim assessments Submit orders at least 30 working days before the actual administration date 20 Interim Assessment Policy Materials Assessment Guide – guide for interims (separate guides: 1 for ELA/Reading; 1 for Math) – guide for end-of year (separate guides: 1 for ELA/Reading; 1 for Math) Answer sheets Test books (separate test books for the subjects) 21 Interim Assessment Policy Required Supplemental Materials English Language Arts/Reading Blank paper Mathematics Blank paper Graph paper (auto shipped for interims and end-of-year) Calculators – Any four-function calculator with memory key 22 Interim Assessment Policy Security Assessment guides are not secure test materials Store at the school until all interims have been administered, then securely destroy Following the administration, interim assessment booklets are to be kept at the schools for 4 weeks, then securely destroyed Booklets must remain in the school Booklets should be accounted for at all times Local decision where booklets are stored at the school (not accessible to students) Teachers should use the booklets with students in reviews Parents may view the booklets only within the school setting. The teacher may share with parents the student’s scores on the items through customary communication (i.e., individual parent/teacher conferences at the school) Interim assessments (booklets, items, content) cannot be shared with other schools 23 Modified End-of-Grade Summative Assessments for Concept Study Participants 24 Summative Test Design— Concept Study • Administered to proof of concept interim assessment sample • Also administered to a “control” sample of schools that did not take the interim assessments • The modified end-of-grade (EOG) is a version of the EOG test without the embedded field test items • Operational items are the same as the EOG administered statewide 25 Summative Test Policy— Concept Study End-of-Year assessments follow the same guidelines as the End-ofGrade Assessments – Multiple forms – Test window – Test security – Supplemental materials – Paper/pencil administrations only – Submit accommodation notification forms – Scanned locally – Reporting – Scores included in accountability calculations 26 Proof of Concept Study Reporting 27 Analyze and Interpret Interim Assessment Results • What went well/what needs work (content and instruction) • Observe patterns • Formulate inferences/verify inferences • Draw conclusions which may lead to changes in assessment or instruction 28 Use of Interim Assessment Results • Identify students who may need intervention prior to additional assessments • Data can be used to focus future instruction based on student needs High-quality corrective instruction Enrichment activities • Plan opportunities for students to show a new level of understanding during instruction 29 ELA/Reading Grade 6 Class Roster Class Rosters Mathematics Grade 5 Class Roster ELA/Reading Grade 6 Class Goal/Subscore Roster Individual Student Report Mathematics Grade 5 Class Goal/Subscore Roster Individual Student Report Individual Student Report ELA/Reading Grade 6 Class Item Report Individual Student Report Mathematics Grade 5 Class Item Report Class Item Report ELA/Reading Grade 6 Class Item Report Mathematics Grade 5 Class Item Report Mathematics Grade 5 Class Item Report Item Number 7 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 18 Correct Answer A D C B A B C D B Student 1 A D C B A D A B C Student 2 A D A B A B B D B Student 3 A D C B A B C D C Student 4 B D C B A B C D A Student 5 B D B B A D C A D Student 6 B D C B A B A A A Student 7 B D A B C D A D B Student 8 A D C B A B C D B Student 9 B D C B C B C A B Student 10 B C B B C C D C A Student 11 A D C B A B B A B Student 12 A C C B A B B D D Student 13 B D C B B B B A B Student 14 A D A B A D B C D Student 15 A D C B A B C D B *This is not actual data. The slide is for training purposes only. Proof of Concept Study Professional Development and Communication 42 NCDPI/Curriculum and Instruction • English Language Arts Grade 6 • Held three webinars • August 19 - Standards Study • August 20 -Text Complexity • October 22 • www.edmodo.com Code:2d93zp • Math Grade 5 • Held three face-to-face meetings in August, 2015 • Teachers preferred • Travel reimbursed and CEUs granted • NCDPI Mathematics Wiki: http://maccess.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Home 43 NCDPI/Accountability Services • Held 6 webinars between July 13 and October 29, 2015 • Email list • Proof of Concept Page on NC Education • • • • • • • https://center.ncsu.edu/ncaccount Assessment Brief Frequently Asked Questions Talking Points Gridded Response Practice Activity (shipped prior to Interim 1) Sample Answer Sheets and Reports Interim 2 ELA/Reading Constructed Response Item Scoring Rubric • Monthly updates provide to the NC State Board of Education 44 Proof of Concept Study Stakeholder Input 45 Surveys and Observations • Surveys are distributed for each interim assessment administration • • • • Parent (link provided on student report) Teacher LEA test coordinator Report turn around time • Administration observations • Testing Policy and Operations • Regional Accountability Coordinators 46 Proof of Concept Study Resources 47 NC Education Page Use the following link to access presentations, memos and resources https://center.ncsu.edu/ncaccount 48 Questions? 49 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/READING GRADE 6 Concept Study 2015-16 Interim Assessment Test Specification Information Purpose of the Interim Assessments A through-course assessment model typically consists of three or four assessments administered throughout the school year to provide teachers and parents with immediate feedback for guiding subsequent instruction. A proof of concept study of the model will be conducted for grade 5 math and grade 6 English Language Arts (ELA)/reading during the 2015–16 school year to address research questions intended to determine the feasibility of designing a system for statewide implementation. Sampling Procedure To ensure results are generalizable to the entire state, an iterative stratified random sampling framework was used to select a representative sample of 35 schools (4,859 students). Four demographic variables: region, ethnicity, gender, and economically disadvantaged students and one school-level achievement variable: mean-scale score were used to ensure the sample selected is representative of the state. Developing Assessments North Carolina educators play an important role in the test development process through writing and reviewing test items. North Carolina professional educators from across the state who have current classroom experience are recruited and trained as item writers and developers for state tests. Diversity among the item writers and their knowledge of the current state-adopted content standards are addressed during recruitment. Trained North Carolina educators also review items and suggest improvements, if necessary. The use of classroom teachers from across the state ensures that instructional validity is maintained. If a teacher is interested in training to become an item writer or reviewer for the North Carolina Testing Program, he/she can visit https://center.ncsu.edu/nc/x_courseNav/index.php?id=21 and take the appropriate subject area “A” level Content Standards Overview course and the “B” level Test Development Basics course in the Moodle system. Once the online training courses are completed, the teacher will be directed to go to an online interest form. Teachers who submit interest forms will be contacted when item writing or reviewing is needed in their subject area. Test Window and Test Administration Time Local education agencies (LEAs)/charter schools may determine the administration days for each interim assessment within the NCDPI-designated assessment windows. Interim 1 Interim 2 Interim 3 October 1–30, 2015 December 8, 2015–January 22, 2016 March 3–31, 2016 Students are allowed up to 90 minutes to answer all items. _____________________________________________________________________________________ NC Department of Public Instruction/Accountability Services Division Page 1 Updated December 15, 2015 Test Structure and Test Administration Time Each ELA/reading grade 6 interim assessment will contain 20 items. All interim assessments will consist of four-response-option multiple-choice items. Each multiple-choice item is worth 1 point. Interim assessments 2 and 3 will each include one constructed response item. The constructed response item will be worth up to 3 points. The constructed response item will be short answer and can typically be answered in a paragraph or less. Students will write their responses on the lines provided on the answer sheet. Students must not write beyond the end of the lines or in the margins. Words written in the margins or unlined areas of the answer sheet will not be scored. Students must not add more lines to the answer sheet. Words written on extra lines will not be scored. Scorers only review for the specific criteria as stated in the item. Additional information not required in the answer will not increase the student’s score. Interim Assessment Number of Number of Total Number Total Number Multiple-Choice Constructed of Items of Score Items Response Items Points* Interim 1 20 0 20 20 Interim 2 19 1 20 22 Interim 3 19 1 20 22 * Multiple-choice items are worth 1 point each. The constructed response item is worth up to 3 points. Each interim assessment will include three selections. Interim Assessment Interim 1 Interim 2 Interim 3 Number of Poetry Selections Number of Informational Selections Number of Literature Selections 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 2 1 Approximate Lexile Range for Informational and Literature Selections 880L–980L 900L–1050L 980L–1230L Sample answer sheets may be viewed at https://center.ncsu.edu/ncaccount/. Prioritization of Standards The NCDPI invited teachers to collaborate and develop recommendations for a prioritization of the standards indicating the relative importance of each standard, the anticipated instructional time, and the appropriateness of the standard for multiple-choice and constructed response item formats. Interim assessments are aligned to the NC Standard Course of Study (NCSCS) for English Language Arts, adopted by the North Carolina State Board of Education in June 2010. Some standards not designated with tested items may be a prerequisite standard or may be tested within the context of another standard. _____________________________________________________________________________________ NC Department of Public Instruction/Accountability Services Division Page 2 Updated December 15, 2015 The NCSCS may be reviewed by visiting the NCDPI K-12 English Language Arts wiki site at http://elaccss.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Common+Core+State+Standards. Some content standards in the NCSCS are not directly assessed because either (1) the standard cannot be appropriately assessed during a limited time assessment using multiple-choice and/or constructed response items or (2) the standard is better assessed through another, more inclusive standard. The following standards are assessed on each ELA/reading interim assessment. o RL.1, RL.2, RL.3, RL.4, RL.5, L.4a, L.5.a o RI.1, RI.2, RI.3, RI.4, RI.5, RI.6, RI.8 o Interim Assessment 2: The short-answer constructed response item will assess RL.2. Guidance to support student response can be found in W.9.a. Students will respond to text. o Interim Assessment 3: The short-answer constructed response item will assess RI.2. Guidance to support student response can be found in W.9.a. Students will respond to text. All students are expected to be able to comprehend texts of steadily increasing complexity as they progress through a grade. Both quantitative and qualitative measures are used to determine the complexity of a text. The qualitative measure of text complexity includes making informed decisions about the difficulty of a text in terms of a number of factors such as levels of meaning or purpose, structure, language conventionality and clarity, and knowledge demands. The text complexity of the selections chosen for the proof of concept study will increase throughout the year. Cognitive Rigor and Item Complexity Assessment items are designed, developed, and classified to ensure that the cognitive rigor of the test forms aligns to the cognitive complexity and demands of the NCSCS for English Language Arts. These items will require students to demonstrate the range of cognitive processes from recall of information to the application of concepts and skills. Eligible Students All students enrolled in grade 6 (according to PowerSchool) at the sampled schools and who participate in the end-of-grade (EOG) English Language Arts/reading assessments are expected to participate with or without accommodations in the Grade 6 English Language Arts/reading Proof of Concept Study. The only exceptions are as follows: Students with disabilities who, according to their Individual Education Program documentation, participate in the NCEXTEND1 alternate assessment in accordance with state policies. In rare cases, student deemed both medically fragile because of a significant medical emergency and/or condition and unable to participate in a specified administration may be granted a medical exception. All medical exceptions must be approved by the Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. _____________________________________________________________________________________ NC Department of Public Instruction/Accountability Services Division Page 3 Updated December 15, 2015 Delivery Mode All interim assessments will be delivered on paper-and-pencil. Scoring and Reporting Interim Assessment 1: Answer sheets will be scanned by the LEA test coordinator. Reports will be distributed by the LEA test coordinator within five school days. Teachers will receive a class roster and class item report within five school days. A class subscore roster will be available for the Interim 1 Assessment in late-November in response to feedback from the field. Interim Assessments 2 and 3: Interim assessments 2 and 3 contain both multiple-choice items and a constructed response item. LEA test coordinators will return the answer sheets to be scored centrally. Scored test records and answer sheets will be returned to the LEA test coordinator within seven days of receipt. Score reports and student answer sheets with student responses will be distributed to teachers no later than three school days after receipt from the NCDPI. Teachers will receive a class roster, class item report and a class subscore roster. Rubrics for the constructed response items will be posted to https://center.ncsu.edu/ncaccount/ after answer sheets from all participating schools have been scored. The statewide test window ends January 22, 2016. An individual student report (ISR) for each interim assessment should be provided to parents within 30 calendar days. Sample reports may be viewed at https://center.ncsu.edu/ncaccount/. Teacher Access to Test Books Following the administration of an interim assessment (i.e., all eligible students at grade 6 have been tested and any makeup sessions are complete) the interim assessment books must be stored at the school for four weeks. The books must be stored in a secure, locked area that is not accessible to students but is accessible to the Proof of Concept teachers. The NCDPI recommends that the assessment books be checked out to the classroom teacher for four weeks so that the teacher has them readily available for review sessions with students and conferences with parents. Teachers must store the books in a locked drawer or cabinet that is not accessible to students. Test books must not be taken home by teachers or students. Parents can view the student’s test book and responses only within the school setting. Interim assessments (e.g., books, items, content, correct answers) cannot be shared with other schools or teachers who are not participating in the Proof of Concept Study. Additional information is available in the Proof of Concept Teacher’s Guide. Resources Additional information such as memos, webinar slides, frequently asked questions, talking points and samples of answer sheets are available through NC Education at https://center.ncsu.edu/ncaccount/. Users must create an account in order to access this page. The account is free of charge. _____________________________________________________________________________________ NC Department of Public Instruction/Accountability Services Division Page 4 Updated December 15, 2015 MATH GRADE 5 Concept Study 2015-16 Interim Assessment Test Specification Information Purpose of the Interim Assessments A through-course assessment model typically consists of three or four assessments administered throughout the school year to provide teachers and parents with immediate feedback for guiding subsequent instruction. A proof of concept study of the model will be conducted for grade 5 math and grade 6 English language arts/reading during the 2015–16 school year to address research questions intended to determine the feasibility of designing a system for statewide implementation. Sampling Procedure To ensure results are generalizable to the entire state, an iterative stratified random sampling framework was used to select a representative sample of 45 schools (4,021 students). Four demographic variables: region, ethnicity, gender, and economically disadvantaged students and one school-level achievement variable: mean-scale score were used to ensure the sample selected is representative of the state. Developing Assessments North Carolina educators play an important role in the test development process through writing and reviewing test items. North Carolina professional educators from across the state who have current classroom experience are recruited and trained as item writers and developers for state tests. Diversity among the item writers and their knowledge of the current state-adopted content standards are addressed during recruitment. Trained North Carolina educators also review items and suggest improvements, if necessary. The use of classroom teachers from across the state ensures that instructional validity is maintained. If a teacher is interested in training to become an item writer or reviewer for the North Carolina Testing Program, he/she can visit https://center.ncsu.edu/nc/x_courseNav/index.php?id=21 and take the appropriate subject area “A” level Content Standards Overview course and the “B” level Test Development Basics course in the Moodle system. Once the online training courses are completed, the teacher will be directed to go to an online interest form. Teachers who submit interest forms will be contacted when item writing or reviewing is needed in their subject area. Test Window and Test Administration Time Local education agencies (LEAs)/charter schools may determine the administration days for each interim assessment within the NCDPI-designated assessment windows. Interim 1 Interim 2 Interim 3 October 1–30, 2015 December 8, 2015–January 22, 2016 March 3–31, 2016 Students are allowed up to 90 minutes to answer all items. _____________________________________________________________________________________ NC Department of Public Instruction/Accountability Services Division Page 1 Updated December 15, 2015 Test Structure and Test Administration Time Each math grade 5 interim assessment will contain 25 items. All interim assessments will consist of four-response-option multiple-choice items and gridded response items. Each item is worth 1 point. All interim assessments will include both calculator active and calculator inactive items. Item Type Multiple-choice Gridded Response Number of Items by Item Type 21 4 Calculator Inactive 8 4 Calculator Active 13 0 Sample answer sheets may be viewed at https://center.ncsu.edu/ncaccount/. Prioritization of Standards The NCDPI invited teachers to collaborate and develop recommendations for a prioritization of the standards indicating the relative importance of each standard, the anticipated instructional time, and the appropriateness of the standard for multiple-choice and gridded response item formats. Interim assessments are aligned to the NC Standard Course of Study (NCSCS) for Mathematics, adopted by the North Carolina State Board of Education in June 2010. Some standards not designated with tested items may be a prerequisite standard or may be tested within the context of another standard. The NCSCS may be reviewed by visiting the NCDPI K-12 Mathematics wiki site at http://maccss.ncdpi.wikispaces.net. Some content standards in the NCSCS are not directly assessed because either (1) the standard cannot be appropriately assessed during a limited time assessment using multiple-choice and/or gridded-response items or (2) the standard is better assessed through another, more inclusive standard. The following content standards are assessed on the math interim assessments. INTERIM ASSESSMENT 1: o 5.NBT.2 o 5.NBT.5 o 5.MD.5.b o 5.MD.5.c INTERIM ASSESSMENT 2: o 5.NF.1 o 5.NF.2 o 5.NF.3 o 5.NBT.6 o 5.NBT.7 (focus of standard is on the operation of addition and subtraction) INTERIM ASSESSMENT 3: o 5.NF.2 o 5.NF.4 a & b o 5.NF.6 o 5.NF.7 a, b & c o 5.NBT.7 _____________________________________________________________________________________ NC Department of Public Instruction/Accountability Services Division Page 2 Updated December 15, 2015 Cognitive Rigor and Item Complexity Assessment items are designed, developed, and classified to ensure that the cognitive rigor of the test forms align to the cognitive complexity and demands of the NCSCS for Mathematics. These items will require students to demonstrate the range of cognitive processes from recall of information to the application of concepts and skills. Eligible Students All students enrolled in grade 5 (according to PowerSchool) at the sampled schools and who participate in the end-of-grade (EOG) mathematics assessments are expected to participate with or without accommodations in the Grade 5 Mathematics Proof of Concept Study. The only exceptions are as follows: Students with disabilities who, according to their Individual Education Program documentation, participate in the NCEXTEND1 alternate assessment in accordance with state policies. In rare cases, student deemed both medically fragile because of a significant medical emergency and/or condition and unable to participate in a specified administration may be granted a medical exception. All medical exceptions must be approved by the Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Delivery Mode All interim assessments will be delivered on paper-and-pencil. Scoring and Reporting Interim Assessment 1: Answer sheets will be scanned by the LEA test coordinator. Reports will be distributed by the LEA test coordinator within five school days. Teachers will receive a class roster and class item report within five school days. A class subscore roster will be available for the Interim 1 Assessment in late-November in response to feedback from the field. Interim Assessments 2 and 3: Answer sheets will be scanned by the LEA test coordinator. Reports will be distributed by the LEA test coordinator within five school days. Teachers will receive a class roster, class item report and a class subscore roster. An individual student report (ISR) for each interim assessment should be provided to parents within 30 calendar days. Sample reports may be viewed at https://center.ncsu.edu/ncaccount/. Teacher Access to Test Books Following the administration of an interim assessment (i.e., all eligible students at grade 5 have been tested and any makeup sessions are complete) the interim assessment books must be stored at the school for four weeks. The books must be stored in a secure, locked area that is not accessible to students but is accessible to the Proof of Concept teachers. The NCDPI recommends that the assessment books be checked out to the classroom teacher for four weeks so that the teacher has them readily available for review sessions with students and conferences with parents. Teachers must store the books in a locked drawer or cabinet that is not accessible to students. Test books and class item reports must not be removed from the school setting. Reproducing or distributing content from the test books or class item reports is not permitted. _____________________________________________________________________________________ NC Department of Public Instruction/Accountability Services Division Page 3 Updated December 15, 2015 Parents can view the student’s test book and responses only within the school setting. Interim assessments (books, items, content, correct answers) cannot be shared with other schools or teachers who are not participating in the Proof of Concept Study. Additional information is available in the Proof of Concept Teacher’s Guide. Resources Gridded response practice materials are available at http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/testing/eog/math/. Additional information such as memos, webinar slides, frequently asked questions, talking points and samples of answer sheets are available through NC Education at https://center.ncsu.edu/ncaccount/. Users must create an account in order to access this page. The account is free of charge. _____________________________________________________________________________________ NC Department of Public Instruction/Accountability Services Division Page 4 Updated December 15, 2015 North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Proof of Concept Study Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) September 2015 The following FAQ has been developed by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI) to assist districts/schools in the implementation of the Proof of Concept Study. This information should be used in conjunction with any published supplements or updates. Additional information about the Proof of Concept Study may be found at https://center.ncsu.edu/ncaccount/. Purpose, Participation, and Preparation 1. The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI) is developing a through-grade assessment model. What is a through-grade assessment model, and what are its purposes? North Carolina’s through-grade assessment model includes testing in grades 3 through 8. The model consists of three interim assessments administered throughout the school year and a stand-alone summative assessment at the end of the year. Interim assessments administered throughout the year inform instruction and help predict performance on future assessments during the same year. A Proof of Concept Study of the through-grade model is being conducted during 2015–16 to provide the State Board of Education (SBE) with data and information to help them decide the best course of action for North Carolina assessments. 2. How were schools selected for the Proof of Concept Study? For the Proof of Concept Study, the NCDPI selected a representative sample of schools that reflects statewide student demographics related to ethnicity, gender, previous mean scale score on state tests, and geographic location. The NCDPI pulled the smallest sample possible to reduce the impact on schools. 3. How many students were pulled for the sample? The NCDPI testing staff identified a representative sample of schools with a target population of 3,500– 4,500 students each for Mathematics (grade 5) and English Language Arts/Reading (grade 6). 4. For selected LEAs, can all schools participate? No, only the charter schools and public schools specifically selected within each local education agency (LEA) can participate in the Proof of Concept Study. 5. Will sampled teachers receive professional development? Yes, professional development is provided in preparation for the Proof of Concept Studies in English Language Arts/Reading and Mathematics. 6. What is the modified end-of-grade assessment? The modified end-of-grade (EOG) assessment is a version of the EOG test without embedded field test items. At the end of the school year, sampled students participating in the study will take this shortened EOG assessment for the content area in which they were selected. 7. How were the test specifications determined? Active classroom teachers, instructional coaches, and LEA curriculum and instruction leaders met in late June and early July. The first half of the meetings included training by the NCDPI/K–12 Curriculum and Instruction teams. The second half of the meetings were led by the NCDPI Test Development team, which collected and documented feedback and recommendations. Following the meetings, the test development team discussed the feedback with NCDPI Curriculum and Instruction to finalize the test specifications. NCDPI/Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program September 1, 2015 8. Are parents able to request that their students not participate in the Proof of Concept Study? Although the NCDPI recognizes parents’ concerns about additional testing, the SBE does not allow students to opt out of required state testing, including field tests and special studies. Test Administration and Format 1. What are the assessment windows, and can districts or schools determine the local window? LEAs/charter schools may determine the testing days for each interim assessment within the NCDPIdesignated assessment windows. The assessment window for the modified end-of-grade assessment occurs during the final instructional days of the school year. The assessment windows for interims and the end-ofyear modified EOG assessment are as follows: Interim 1: October 1–30, 2015 Interim 2: December 8, 2015–January 22, 2016 Interim 3: March 3–31, 2016 Modified End-of-Grade: during the NCDPI-designated testing window for EOG assessments 2. Why are there three interims instead of two? A review of sampled district reports revealed that interim reporting to parents most often occurs every nine weeks for elementary and middle school students. Having three interims coincides with typical district reporting. Feedback regarding the number of interims and the testing windows will be collected during the proof of concept year. 3. What is the format of the Proof of Concept assessments? The interim and modified EOG assessments are paper-pencil format. 4. What are the number of items and item types on the assessments? The grade 5 mathematics assessments contain 21 multiple-choice items and 4 gridded response items. The grade 6 English language arts/reading assessment contains 20 items: Interim 1 contains all multiple-choice items; Interims 2 and 3 contain 19 multiple-choice items and 1 constructive response item. 5. How much time will it take to complete the interim assessments? Teachers will allow a maximum time of ninety (90) minutes for each interim assessment. If all students finish the interim and are ready to turn in their assessment before the scheduled 90 minutes is over, the teachers may end the testing session early. The NCDPI will conduct time studies for each interim assessment. 6. Will students taking the modified EOG have one assessment book or two? Students will have one assessment book that will contain the modified English Language Arts/Reading or Mathematics EOG assessment and the regular EOG assessment (i.e., the grade 5 assessment book will contain the regular English Language Arts/Reading EOG and the modified Mathematics EOG; the grade 6 assessment book will contain the regular Mathematics EOG and the modified English Language Arts/Reading EOG). 7. Are proctors required? Proctors are not required for the administration of the interim assessments. However, a trained proctor should be assigned and present for each modified EOG assessment. 8. Must test administrators remove displays from their walls? Teachers are not required to remove bulletin boards and instructional displays for the interim assessments; but for the modified EOG assessment, teachers are required to cover or remove bulletin boards, instructional displays, and reference materials (printed or attached) on student desks or workstations if they contain content being measured or test-taking strategies. NCDPI/Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program September 1, 2015 Accommodations and Alternate Assessments 1. Are instructional accommodations allowed for the interim assessments? Yes, students with disabilities may use instructional accommodations for the interims except for the Read Aloud and Signing/Cueing accommodations for the grade 6 ELA/reading. Reading aloud or signing/cueing the selections, questions, or answer choices on the ELA/reading assessment invalidates results because the interims measure reading skills. 2. What accommodations will students use for the modified EOG assessment? Students may use the same accommodations that are specified in their current Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), Section 504 Plans, or LEP documentation for the EOG assessment. The IEP, 504, and/or LEP teams do not have to reconvene and document the accommodations for the Proof of Concept Study. 3. Will there be an alternate assessment for the Proof of Concept Study? There is no alternate assessment available for the Proof of Concept Study. Students with disabilities, who according to their IEP documentation, participate in the NCEXTEND1 alternate assessment do not participate in the Proof of Concept Study. Scoring, Reporting, and Accountability 1. What is the time schedule for scoring and returning interim assessment results? The LEA test coordinator and the Regional Accountability Coordinator (RAC) for charter schools will scan all grade 5 Mathematics Interim Assessments and the grade 6 English Language Arts/Reading Interim 1 Assessment. The score reports for these interims will be available immediately. The Grade 6 English Language Arts/Reading Interim Assessments 2 and 3 will include a constructed response item that will require them to be shipped and scored centrally. LEAs/charter schools must return answer documents using overnight shipping to the North Carolina State University/Technical Outreach for Public Schools (NCSU/TOPS). Scoring will begin the morning following the receipt of the materials. LEAs/charter schools should allow 7 days from the date of shipment for the return of results for the grade 6 English Language Arts/Reading Interim Assessments 2 and 3. 2. What type of information will be provided to teachers? To parents? Each interim assessment will generate student-level reports indicating the number of items correct by content standard, item type, and selection type, and will report an overall score. Teacher-level reports will provide a summary with similar information. Parents will receive student reports with an overall score by standard and item number. 3. Will reporting occur online or via paper? Paper reports are provided for the 2015–16 Proof of Concept year. Should the Proof of Concept studies yield positive results and the SBE decide to move forward with field testing, then an online reporting system will be developed to provide results to teachers. 4. Will the interim items be available to teachers after the administration? Yes, interim assessment booklets will remain available to teachers in the participating schools for four weeks following the interim assessment administrations. After that time, schools must follow local procedures in securely destroying the interim assessment books. 5. Will district and state comparison data be reported for the interim assessments? Data will be reported by student, teacher, and school. School and district comparisons will not be reported during the Proof of Concept year. The purpose of the interim assessments is to provide teachers with student-level data to guide instruction. NCDPI/Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program September 1, 2015 6. Will the interim assessments “predict” performance on the modified EOG assessment? The interim assessments administered during the 2015–16 Proof of Concept Study will not predict performance on the modified EOG test. In order to show prediction, there must first be a relationship. A relationship may be provided from year 1 to year 2 if the assessment model remains consistent across years. Year 1 may yield a prediction over time with enough evidence. The interim assessments administered during the 2015–16 school year will be built using items from the EOG item bank. Although a prediction cannot be reported, there is direct connection from the interim assessments to the modified EOG test. 7. Will interim assessment scores be included in accountability or teacher-effectiveness calculations? No, interim assessment scores are not included in accountability or teacher-effectiveness calculations. 8. Will the modified EOG assessment be included in accountability or teacher effectiveness calculations? Yes, the modified EOG assessment will be included in accountability and teacher-effectiveness calculations. 9. Will students receive achievement levels on the interims and/or the modified EOG assessments? Students will not receive achievement levels for the interim assessments; however, they will receive an achievement level for the modified EOG assessment. Other 1. Why can’t the modified EOG assessment be administered to all students during the 2015–16 school year? The modified EOG assessment is part of the concept study. Results of the modified EOG and the regular EOG will be analyzed. Also, in order to continue the EOG item-development process, items must be embedded within the EOG forms for the collection of item statistics. 2. Will sample districts/charter schools continue to administer local benchmark assessments? For best practices, the North Carolina Testing Program strongly recommends that sampled schools do not administer a local benchmark for the same subject in which they are participating in the Proof of Concept Study; however, sampled schools may take a local benchmark in another subject. For example, a grade 5 student participating in the mathematics Proof of Concept Study may take a local benchmark for English language arts/reading. 3. Will feedback be collected from participants in the Proof of Concept Studies? Throughout the Proof of Concept year, districts will provide input on the processes and procedures as the study is designed and implemented. The participating schools’ teachers will be provided with student-level data to inform instruction, and these teachers will have the opportunity to give feedback to the NCDPI on the usefulness of the data and the reports. 4. Can participating students participate in bona fide summer school testing opportunities? Yes, students who participate in the Proof of Concept Study may participate in summer school testing. 5. What is the plan for 2016–17 and 2017–18? At the conclusion of 2015–16 and following the appropriate data analysis, the SBE will review the results and provide direction on whether to proceed with a field test in 2016–17 for a sample population. If field testing occurs in 2016–17, then 2017–18 will be a pilot/operational year statewide. NCDPI/Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program September 1, 2015 North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Proof of Concept Study Talking Points for Principals and Teachers September 2015 Additional information about the Proof of Concept Study may be found at https://center.ncsu.edu/ncaccount/. 1. North Carolina’s through-grade assessment model includes testing in grades 3 through 8. The model consists of three interim assessments administered throughout the school year and a stand-alone summative assessment at the end of the year. Interim assessments administered throughout the year inform instruction and help predict performance on future assessments during the year. A Proof of Concept Study of the through-grade model is being conducted during 2015–16 to provide the State Board of Education (SBE) with data and information to help them decide the best course of action for North Carolina assessments. 2. For the Proof of Concept Study, the NCDPI selected a representative sample of schools with a target population of 3,500–4,500 students each for Mathematics (grade 5) and English Language Arts/Reading (grade 6). The sample reflects statewide student demographics related to ethnicity, gender, previous mean scale score on state tests, and geographic location. The NCDPI pulled the smallest sample possible to reduce impact on schools. 3. Although the NCDPI recognizes parents’ concerns about additional testing, the SBE does not allow students to opt out of required state assessments, including field tests and special studies. 4. LEAs/charter schools may determine the assessment days for each interim assessment within the NCDPI-designated assessment windows. The assessment window for the modified end-of-grade (EOG) assessment occurs during the final instructional days of the school year. The assessment windows for interims and the end-of-year modified EOG assessment are as follows: Interim 1: October 1–30, 2015 Interim 2: December 8, 2015–January 22, 2016 Interim 3: March 3–31, 2016 Modified End-of-Grade: during the NCDPI-designated testing window for EOG assessments 5. The Proof of Concept Study consists of three interim assessments and a modified EOG assessment. The modified EOG assessment is a version of the EOG assessment without embedded field test items. At the end of the school year, sampled students participating in the study will take this shortened EOG assessment for the content area in which they were selected. 6. The interim and modified EOG assessments are paper-pencil format. 7. The grade 5 mathematics assessments contain 21 multiple-choice items and 4 gridded response items. 8. The grade 6 English language arts/reading assessment contains 20 items. Interim 1 contains all multiplechoice items. Interims 2 and 3 contain 19 multiple-choice items and 1 constructed response item. NCDPI/Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program September 1, 2015 9. Students with disabilities may use instructional accommodations for the interims except for the Read Aloud and Signing/Cueing accommodations for the grade 6 ELA/reading. Reading aloud or signing/cueing the selections, questions, or answer choices on the ELA/reading assessments invalidates results because the interims measure reading skills. 10. Students may use the same accommodations that are specified in their current Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), Section 504 Plans, or LEP documentation for the EOG assessment. The IEP, 504, and/or LEP teams do not have to reconvene and document the accommodations for the Proof of Concept Study. 11. Each interim assessment will generate student-level reports indicating the number of items correct by content standard, item type, and selection type, and will report an overall score. Teacher-level reports will provide a summary with similar information. Parents will receive student reports with an overall score by standard and item number. 12. The interim assessment booklets will remain available to teachers in the participating schools for four weeks following the interim assessment administrations. Teachers may use the booklets for reviews with students, and parents may view the booklets, but only within the school setting. The teacher may share with parents their student’s scores on the items through customary communication (i.e., individual parent/teacher conferences at the school). Parents may not have copies of the assessment items or assessment book, nor take pictures of any part of the assessment book. 13. The interim assessments administered during the 2015–16 Proof of Concept Study will not predict performance on the modified EOG assessment. In order to show prediction, there must first be a relationship. A relationship may be provided from year 1 to year 2 if the assessment model remains consistent across years. Year 1 may yield a prediction over time with enough evidence. The interim assessments administered during the 2015–16 school year will be built using items from the EOG item bank. Although a prediction cannot be reported, there is direct connection from the interim assessments to the modified EOG assessment. 14. Students will not receive achievement levels for the interim assessments. Students will receive an achievement level for the modified EOG assessment. 15. Interim assessment scores are not included in accountability or teacher-effectiveness calculations. 16. The modified EOG assessment will be included in accountability and teacher-effectiveness calculations. NCDPI/Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program September 1, 2015