Mites in Desert Citrus David Kerns University of Arizona Yuma Agricultural Center Primary Mites of Concern Yuma Spider Mite Eotetranychus yumensis Occasionally a problem. Has been prevalent in large numbers in Yuma County for the past 2 years. Flat Mite Brevipalpus lewisi Common every year. Sometimes reaches damaging levels. Yuma Spider Mite Identified in 1934 on lemons in Yuma, AZ. Habits Wide host range, prefers lemons. Feeds primarily on the underside on the leaves, often along the edge of the grove along dusty roads. Deposits webbing on the underside of the leaves which collects dirt. Little is known about its life cycle. Identification Medium sized. Yellowish color with small red eye spot and some dark pigmentation. However, color can vary depending on host and climate. Yuma Spider Mite Damage Feeding on leaves causes stippling and when abundant may result in leaf drop and may contribute to “fall dieback” or “buggy whipping”. Feeding on the fruit Thought to cause a “bleached” or “bronzing” appearance. May cause scabbing and pitting. Flat Mite Identified in 1942 on lemons in Porterville, CA. Habits Wide host range. Feeds primarily on the fruit, but may be found on the leaves. Does not deposit webbing. Eggs are reddish and are laid on the fruit or leaves. Present year around and hide in crevasses in the winter, become most prevalent beginning in July. Identification Extremely small, ~ 0.25mm in length and are flat. Adults are amber to reddish with black pigmentation. Immatures are usually bright red. Flat Mite Damage Feeding begins where thrips or other pests have fed. Infestation usually begins under the button and then spreads. Injury due to mites is more irregular than thrips and more corky in appearance. Mite Damage Study Flared mites in an 8 ac block of 12 years old lemon using acephate. Used a randomized complete block design with 2 treatments and 4 reps per treatment. Each plot was 5 trees by 5 trees. Treatments Untreated Danitol at 21 oz/ac + Kinetic at 0.1%v/v. Applications made using an orchard sprayer, 150 gal/ac. Counted the number of mites per fruit. Mite populations in lemons, 2002 2.00 Untreated 1.75 1.25 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 Ju n 1 Ju 8 n 26 Ju l Ju 2 l1 Ju 0 l2 Ju 6 l3 1 Au g Au 8 g Au 14 g Au 21 g 28 Se p Se 3 p 11 7 0.00 Ju n # per fruit 1.50 Flat mite Yuma spider mite Two-spotted spider mite Total mites Mite populations in lemons, 2002 2.00 Treated 1.75 1.25 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 Ju n 1 Ju 8 n 26 Ju l2 Ju l1 0 Ju l2 6 Ju l3 1 A ug A 8 ug 1 A 4 ug 2 A 1 ug 28 Se p Se 3 p 11 7 0.00 Ju n # per fruit 1.50 Flat mite Yuma spider mite Two-spotted spider mite Total mites Mite populations in lemons, 2002 2.00 Untreated 1.75 1.25 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 Ju n 1 Ju 8 n 26 Ju l Ju 2 l1 Ju 0 l2 Ju 6 l3 1 Au g Au 8 g Au 14 g Au 21 g 28 Se p Se 3 p 11 7 0.00 Ju n # per fruit 1.50 Flat mite Yuma spider mite Two-spotted spider mite Total mites Typical Damage Damage Rating Used a rating scale. Divide each fruit into four longitudinal quadrants. All quadrants clean One quadrant with damage Two quadrants with damage Three quadrants with damage Four quadrants with damage 1 2 3 4 5 Mite damage in lemons, 2002 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Treated Untreated 0 20 40 60 Percentage in each category 80 100 Mite Efficacy Trial Treatments Rate Agri-Mek 8.0 oz/ac Danitol 21.3 oz/ac Kelthane MF 6 pts/ac Microthiol 80 WP 10 lbs/ac Nexter 8.0 oz/ac Untreated - All treatment included Kinetic at 0.1%v/v Treatments were applied with a vertical boom sprayer at 80 gal/ac Mite Efficacy Test 3 Agrimek Danitol Kelthane Microthiol Nexter Untreated Number per fruit Application July 17, 2002 Yuma Spider Mite - Lemons, Yuma, AZ 2 1 0 6 Dat 14 Dat 22 Dat 28 Dat 35 Dat Conclusions It was evident that mites can cause significant damage in regard to fruit appearance. These data suggest that Yuma mite may be as important as flat mite in damaging the fruit. Mites should be scouted for throughout the summer, at least through July. We are not certain at what density miticides should be applied, but the number maybe as low as one mite per fruit. All miticides evaluated have proven effective for at least two weeks.