GLOBAL COMMODITIES FORUM 7-8 April 2014 GVCs in Commodity-dependent Developing Countries: Patterns of Involvement and Policy Implications by Masataka Fujita Head, Investment Issues and Trends Branch Division on Investment and Enterprise UNCTAD The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of UNCTAD. GVCs in Commodity-dependent Developing Countries: Patterns of Involvement and Policy Implications UNCTAD Global Commodity Forum 2014 7-8 April 2014 Masataka Fujita, Head, Investment Issues and Trends Branch Division on Investment and Enterprise UNCTAD Geneva, 7 April 2014 1 GVCs’ two important findings (World Investment Report 2013) There is correlation between growth in GVC participation and GDP per capita There is correlation between inward FDI and GVC participation GVC Participation vs GDP per Capita Developed Countries - logs Developing Countries - logs 4 7 6 8 GDPpc 9 GDPpc 8 10 10 11 12 GVC Participation vs GDP per Capita 10 12 14 16 18 GVC participation 20 10 12 14 16 GVC participation 18 20 Source: UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2013. 2 Contents Value added trade in commodity-dependent developing countries ▪ GVCs: the trade-investment nexus ▪ Policy options to upgrade value chains 3 How much value added does global trade actually generate? Global value added in trade (goods and services), 2011 $ trillions ~23 ESTIMATES ~7 30% ~16 Global gross exports “Double counting” (foreign value added in exports) “Domestic value added” (Value added in trade) Source: UNCTAD-EORA GVC Database, UNCTAD estimates. 4 How about commodity-dependent countries? Value added in trade, 2011 $ trillions Commodity-dependent developing regionsa Non-commodity dependent developing regionsb ~6.2 ~1.8 29% ~4.4 ~1.4 ~0.2 Gross exports a 15% ~1.2 Foreign value added in exports Domestic value added Includes Africa and South America. Source: UNCTAD-EORA GVC Database. Gross exports b Foreign value added in exports Domestic value added South, East and South-East Asia and Central America. 5 Which sectors have the most segmented value chains? Share of foreign value added in exports, by sector, 2011 Primary 10.5% Secondary Tertiary 32.5% 15.1% Source: UNCTAD-EORA GVC Database. 6 Which industries have the most segmented value chains? Share of foreign value added in exports, top 10 industries, 4 primary industries and some resources-based manufacturers, 2011 1 Manufacture of office, accounting and computing machinery 2 Coke, petroleum products and nuclear fuel 3 Manufacture of radio, television and communication equipment and apparatus 4 Manufacture of wearing apparel; dressing and dyeing of fur 5 Manufacture of motor vehicles, trailers and semi‐trailers 6 Manufacture of electrical machinery and apparatus n.e.c. 7 Manufacture of textiles 8 Manufacture of other transport equipment 9 Other manufacturing 10 Rubber and plastic products 12 Metal and metal products 20 Food, beverages and tobacco 32 Forestry and fishing 34 Mining and quarrying 36 Agriculture and hunting 50 Petroleum 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 % Primary industries Source: UNCTAD-EORA GVC Database. Resources-based manufacturers Note: Based on 50 industries at various levels of industry classification (ISIC 4). 7 How much does trade really contribute to GDP in commodities dependent countries? Non‐commodity‐dependent developing countries Commodity‐dependent developing countries Domestic value added in trade as a share of GDP, 2011 30.3% Africa South America 15.4% South, East and SouthEast Asia Central America 29.9% 17.1% World average Source: UNCTAD-EORA GVC Database. 22.2% 8 How much do they participate in GVCs? GVC participation: the share of a country’s exports that is part of a multi-stage trade process, by summing the foreign value added used in the country’s own exports and the value added supplied to other countries’ exports. Commodity-dependent developing countries Non-commodity dependent developing countries South America Central America 1995 10.0 % 2005 14.2 % 2011 14.0 % 0 31.5 % 1995 36.0 % 9.3 % 26.4 % 40.7 % 2005 37.5 % 10.1 % 27.0 % 41.0 % 2011 40.6 % 21.5 % 15 30 45 60 0 Africa 32.9 % 47.5 % 1995 30.1 % 2005 14.6 % 39.9 % 54.5 % 2005 29.8 % 2011 16.9 % 56.1 % 2011 27.7 % 39.2 % 30 30 45 47.6 % 51.6 % 60 South, East and South-East Asia 14.5 % 15 11.1 % 15 1995 0 45.3 % 45 60 0 50.8 % 20.7 % 24.4 % 54.1 % 53.3 % 25.6 % 15 30 45 60 Foreign value added share Value added incorporated in other countries’ exports 9 Source: UNCTAD-EORA GVC Database. Is GVC participation influenced by the export structure? The foreign value added share in exports (upstream part of GVCs) and the intensity of commodity exports have a negative relationship, while the share of value added incorporated in other countries’ exports (downstream part of GVCs) and the intensity of commodity exports have a positive relationship. Relationship between the share of value added incorporated in other countries' exports and commodity exports sharea, 2011 Relationship between foreign value added share and commodity exports sharea, 2011 120 100 90 100 Commodity export share Commodity exports share 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 80 60 40 20 10 0 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Share of value added incorporated in other countries' exports Foreign value added share a) The share of primary products and resource based on manufacturing exports in the total exports of goods and services. a) The share of primary products and resource based on manufacturing exports in the total exports of goods and services. Source: UNCTAD-EORA GVC Database. 10 What is the impact of GVCs on economic growth? Correlation between growth rates of GVC participation and growth rates of GDP per capita: commodity-dependent developing countries have less clear-cut relationship between them. GVC participation and GDP per capita Commodity‐dependent developing countries (31 countries) 6 Non‐commodity dependent developing countries (30 countries) GVC participation growth rates, 1995‐2011 5 Non commodity‐dependent developing countries 4 Commodity‐dependent developing countries 3 2 1 0 ‐6 ‐4 ‐2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 ‐1 Growth rates of real GDP per capita, 1995‐2011 Source: UNCTAD-EORA GVC Database. 11 Impacts of FDI on GVC participation are not uniform between commodity-dependent developing countries and noncommodity dependent developing countries TNCs increase less GVC participation in commodity-dependent countries than in non-commodity dependent countries. GVC participation and FDI inward stock 50 Commodity‐dependent developing countries (31 countries) GVC participation growth rates, 1995‐2011 45 Non‐commodity dependent developing countries (30 countries) 40 35 Non commodity‐dependent developing countries 30 25 20 Commodity‐dependent developing countries 15 10 5 0 ‐1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Growth rates of FDI inward stock, 1995‐2011 Source: UNCTAD-EORA GVC Database. 12 FDI shapes patterns of value added in trade, but less in commodities-dependent developing countries than noncommodities dependent developing regions Key value added trade indicators (median values), by size of FDI stock relative to GDP, 2011 (Per cent) Noncommoditydependent developing countries Commoditydependent developing countries Foreign value added in trade Countries with high FDI stock relative to GDP Value added contribution of trade to GDP 20 % 20 % Countries with low FDI stock relative to GDP 14 % 13 % Countries with high FDI stock relative to GDP 43 % 46 % Countries with low FDI stock relative to GDP 23 % 0 10 20 19 % 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 Note: 30% is the criteria for high/low FDI stock relative to GDP. Source: UNCTAD-EORA GVC Database. 13 Contents Value added trade in commodity-dependent developing countries GVCs: the trade-investment nexus Policy options to upgrade value chains 14 GVCs are typically coordinated by TNCs Global gross trade (export of goods and services), by type of TNC involvement, 2010 (Trillions of dollars) ESTIMATES TNC-related trade: ~ 19 ~80% ~4 ~ 15 ~ 6.3 ~ 2.4 ~ 6.3 Global trade in goods and services Non-TNC trade Source: UNCTAD World Investment Report 2013. All TNC-related trade Intra-firm trade NEM-generated trade, selected industries TNC arm's length trade 15 Trade structure and investment patterns Trade structure, 2011 Main trade and investment patterns (Distribution share) Goods Primary products and resource‐based manufacturing Low‐technology manufacturing Services Medium‐ technology manufacturing High‐ technology manufacturing Knowledge‐ based services Non‐knowledge based services Trade patterns: Exports remain predominantly within sectors and industries with limited need for imported content and limited domestic productive capacity Investment patterns: Relative high share of natural resources oriented FDI N o n ‐c o m m o d it y d e p e n d e n t d e v e lo p in g c o u n t r ie s C o m m o d it y ‐d e p e n d e n t d e v e lo p in g c o u n t r ie s 1.2 Africa 4.1 6.5 71.2 11.1 2.1 6.5 Trade patterns: Exports remain predominantly within sectors and industries with limited need for imported content and (limited) domestic productive capacity Investment patterns: Relative high shares of natural resources oriented FDI and import-substitution FDI 8.8 Trade patterns: Rapid development of domestic productive capacity for exports competing successfully at high value added levels Investment patterns: FDI acts as a driving force of trade integration and domestic productive capacity building 2.1 South America South, East and South-East Asia 3.8 67.7 20.7 17.3 19.9 11 5 24.7 6.2 1.2 Central America 26.7 8 35.1 21.9 4.2 Note: The sum of individual sectors does not necessarily add up to 100% due to unclassified products. Note: The sum of individual sectors does not necessarily add up to 100% due to unclassified products. Knowledge‐based services include insurance, financial services, computer and information services, royalties and licence fees, and other business services. Trade patterns: Composition of exports shifts towards processing industries requiring higher imported content Investment patterns: - Increased FDI in processing industries - M&As become an important mode of entry Source: Trade data from UNCTAD GlobStat. 16 Contents Value added trade in commodity-dependent developing countries GVCs: the trade-investment nexus Policy options to upgrade value chains 17 Policy options to increase GVC participation and create more domestic value added for commodity-dependent developing countries More GVC participation: integrating more into GVCs Enter (increase relative importance of) more fragmented GVCs More domestic value added creation: capturing more value added Functional and chain upgrading: Move to (or expand to) higher value segments in GVCs; Move to (or expand to) technologically higher value GVCs Product and process upgrading: Increase productivity and value added produced within existing GVC segments 18 Factors and conditions conducive for promoting GVC development and policy measures for commodity-dependent developing countries NOT EXHAUSTIVE GVC development path Required factors and conditions Enter more fragmented GVCs • Conducive investment and trading environment • Basic infrastructure provision • Pool of relatively low‐cost workers Product and process upgrading • Availability and absorptive capacities of domestic supplier firms and partners • Reliable basic infrastructure services (utilities and telecommunications) • Pool of relatively low‐cost semi‐skilled/skilled workers Functional and chain upgrading • Presence of domestic supplier base fully integrated in multiple GVCs (reduced reliance on individual GVCs) • Absorptive capacities at higher technology levels, capacity to engage in R&D activities • Presence of TNCs capable of GVC coordination and a domestic and international supplier base Policy measures Embedding GVCs in development strategy and enabling participation: • Incorporating GVCs in industrial development policies • Creating and maintaining a conducive environment • Putting in place infrastructural prerequisites for GVC participation Building domestic productive capacity: • Supporting enterprise development and enhancing the bargaining power of local firms • Strengthening skills of the workforce Providing a stronger governance framework: • Supporting local firms in complying with international standards • Effective national innovation system, R&D policies and intellectual property rules 19