Compacted DNA Nanoparticles for Gene Therapy Mark J. Cooper, M.D. Copernicus Therapeutics, Inc. Barriers to Successful Gene Therapy 1 1. Survive transport through extracellular space 2 2. Cell uptake 3 3. Resistance to nuclease degradation 6 4. Nuclear transport 4 5 6 5. Small size permits entry through nuclear pores (25 nm diameter) 6. Uncoating to release biologically active nucleic acid Why Gene Therapy Has Not Worked z VIRAL VECTORS z modify a human pathogenic virus to express desired gene toxic unable to be given more than once (innate immunity) less effective in human tissues than initially hoped NON-VIRAL VECTORS (before Copernicus) toxic in some systems generally less effective than viral vectors Unimolecular DNA Compaction Condensation of a Single Molecule of DNA to Form DNA Nanoparticles z z z z É Nuclease resistant; stabile in serum Rapid cellular and nuclear uptake Non-degradative intracellular trafficking pathway Entry into nucleus of non-dividing cells High in vivo transfection efficiency DNA Nanoparticle: Component Formulation CK30 DNA PEG maleimide CK30PEG10k Copernicus Formulation of PEG-Substituted DNA Nanoparticles PEG-CK30 and plasmid DNA z lysine counterion determines shape z single DNA molecule z reproducible formulation z homogeneous population z no aggregation in saline z [DNA] > 12 mg/ml z nuclease resistant z stable > 3 years z consistent in vivo results z transfect post-mitotic cells z PHASE I TRIAL CF z 100 nm TFA 100 nm Acetate Stoichiometry of DNA Nanoparticles 8234 bp CFTR expression plasmid + CK30PEG10k 16,468 negative charges DNA CK30PEG10k MOLES PER COMPLEX 1 549 Bound Charge Ratio 1.5 2.9 kbp 1.0 1.0 5.1 kbp 28 kbp 0.5 0.0 0.0 MOLECULAR WEIGHT ≅ 13.1 x 106 gm/mol 1.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.0 3.5 Input Charge Ratio J. Biol. Chem. 278:32578-32586, 2003 Calculated and Measured Volumes of Compacted DNA Nanoparticles A1 H1 50 2.9 kbp Frequency 40 A2 H2 30 20 10 0 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 Volume (nm3) J. Biol. Chem. 278:32578-32586, 2003 Characterization Flow Chart of DNA Nanoparticles EM A260/A280 EM A260/A280 GEL ANALYSIS TURBIDITY ANALYSIS SALT STABILITY SERUM STABILITY OSMOLALITY, pH ENDOTOXIN BIOBURDEN STERILITY TANGENTIAL FLOW FILTRATION removal of excess polycation CONCENTRATION DIAFILTRATION only detectable component is compacted DNA Nanoparticle Shape is Determined by Polycation Counterion at the Time of DNA Mixing Trifluoroacetate (TFA) z Acetate z Bicarbonate z Chloride z Bromide z ellipsoids rods rods, toroids rods (partial) ellipsoids IMPORTANT FUNCTIONAL CORRELATES FOLLOWING IN VIVO GENE TRANSFER In Vivo Gene Transfer Nanoparticle Optimization ** z Intrapulmonary ** z Intradermal * z Intramuscular Intravenous z Topical ** z Intracranial *** z Intraocular z Polycation composition Polycation counterion Length of polycation +/- PEG PEG Size Percent PEG substitution +/- Targeting ligands ** robust transfection by “non-targeted” complexes Detection of lacZ After Lung Gene Transfer of DNA Nanoparticles Nova Red stain No primary AB 5/8 mice 3/8 mice Mol. Ther. 8:936-947, 2003 Compacted DNA Nanoparticles: Efficient Transfection of Post-Mitotic Airway Cells A Intranasal Intrapulmonary B Microinjection of Naked DNA or Compacted DNA Nanoparticles 100 Naked Nucleus z EGFP expression plasmid 50 Compacted Nucleus z Rh-Dextran 155 kD 25 Naked Cytoplasm z live cells imaged Green cells % 75 *** Compacted Cytoplasm 20 (no fixation) *** *** 10 z * 0 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0 1000.0 5 kbp plasmid [DNA] (μg/ml) J. Biol. Chem. 278:32578-32586, 2003 samples blinded before analysis Microinjection of DNA Nanoparticles of Different Sizes 50 GFP Plasmids 2.9 kbp 5.1 kbp (lambda DNA stuffer fragment) 10.7 kbp (lambda DNA stuffer fragment) 28 kbp (Marek’s virus DNA stuffer fragment) z 28 40 Minor length (nm) z 30 5.1 10.7 2.9 20 Equivalent serum stabilities 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Major length (nm) J. Biol. Chem. 278:32578-32586, 2003 Size of Compacted DNA Nanoparticle Determines Nuclear Entry Following Microinjection EGFP Positive Cells (%) 60 Nucleus, Compacted DNA 50 Nucleus, Naked DNAl 40 Cytoplasm, Compacted DNA 30 15 Cytoplasm, Naked DNA ** 10 5 0 15 20 25 30 35 40 Minor length (nm) 45 50 J. Biol. Chem. 278:32578-32586, 2003 Effect of DNA Nanoparticle Size on Intrapulmonary Gene Delivery Rods Luciferase Plasmids (kbp) λ DNA stuffer fragments 5.3 9.7 20.2 Ellipsoids 10 10 1 Major Diameter (nm) TFA 20.2 luc TFA 9.7 luc 20 TFA 5.3 luc 30 Ac 20.2 luc 40 Ac 9.7 luc 50 log (RLU/mg protein/pmol DNA above background) TFA Ellipsoids Ac 5.3 luc 60 70 80 90 100 50 40 30 20 10 Minor Diameter (nm) Plasmid Size and Shape: Intrapulmonary Gene Transfer 10 6 10 5 10 4 10 3 10 2 DNA Nanoparticles What is the mechanism for cell entry? In Vitro Transfection of Primary Human Tracheal Epithelial Cells 15 min 30 min 60 min DNA Nuclei Merged Image Collaborative studies with Drs. Diane Kube and Pam Davis, CWRU Uptake and Trafficking of Non-Targeted DNA Nanoparticles PRIMARY AIRWAY CELLS nucleolus nuclear FITC -- nucleolin Rh -- DNA pore NON-DEGRADATIVE TRAFFICKING PATHWAY little colocalization with antibodies to Rab 5, EEA-1, cathepsin D, or LAMP-1 cell surface nucleolin + BINDING TO CELL SURFACE NUCLEOLIN COMPLEX - 98% 0% DNA+ post-translational modification In collaboration with D. Kube and P. Davis, CWRU DNA nanoparticle nucleolin Tissues with Cell Surface Nucleolin Differentiated lung cells (Pam Davis, CWRU) z Neuronal cells (brain, eye) z Neovasculature of tumors (diabetic retinopathy?, macular degeneration?) z Tumor cells z É Initiate clinical trial for a pulmonary indication Clinical Trial -- Cystic Fibrosis Monogenetic z Treatment z Prevalence z Carriers z Mortality z The CFTR gene encodes a membrane-bound chloride channel; mutations in CFTR cause abnormally thick, sticky mucus in the lungs that leads to recurrent lung infections Symptomatic -- no current therapy addresses the underlying cause of CF ~70,000 patients in the US and Europe More than 10 million Americans are asymptomatic carriers of a defective CFTR gene Most patients succumb to progressive respiratory failure, with a median age of survival of 33.4 years Source: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Correction of Chloride Channel Defect in CFTR -/- Mice Mouse 3 Pre-treatment NPD Mouse 1 3 Days post rx Pre-treatment 3 Days post rx 12.5 mV 200 sec Saline treated CFTR IHC Mouse 3 Mouse 1 collaborative studies with A. Ziady and P. Davis Single Dose Escalation Study to Evaluate Safety of Nasal Administration of CFTR001 Gene Transfer Vector to Subjects with Cystic Fibrosis Konstan MW,1 Wagener JS,2 Hilliard KA,1 Kowalczyk TH3, Hyatt SL,3 Fink TL,3 Gedeon CR,3 Oette SM3, Payne JM3, Muhammad O3, Klepcyk P,3 Peischl A,3 Davis PB1, Moen RC3, Cooper MJ3 Copernicus Therapeutics, Inc. 3 Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 2 CF Clinical Trial CTI02001 Phase I z Placebo-controlled, double-blind z IN application z Single dose, dose escalation z 3 dose levels (12 patients) z 1/2 log increments (10-fold range) – 0.40 mg/ml x 2 ml = 0.80 mg (2 patients) – 1.33 mg/ml x 2 ml = 2.67 mg (4 patients) – 4.00 mg/ml x 2 ml = 8.00 mg (6 patients) CFTR Expression Plasmid KmR CMV Enhancer CMV promoter ColE1 origin CMV intron A HTLV-Ru5 BGH polyA pKCPIRCFTRBGH(-) 8234 bp hCFTR CF Clinical Trial CTI02001: Toxicity Measurements Standard clinical/laboratory assessments z Nasal washings z baseline days 2, 3, 4, 7, 14 – cell count – cytokines (IL-6, IL-8) – total protein Serum IL-6 z PFTs, CXR, SaO2, CH50, CRP z CF Clinical Trial CTI02001: Toxicity Measurements No reportable adverse events z No adverse events attributed to clinical trial material z (1) grade II pulmonary CF exacerbation at day 14 all other adverse events grade I Mild, transient serum IL-6 rise in 1 subject z No significant nasal washing IL-6 or IL-8 elevations z No other laboratory or test abnormalities z Data reviewed by DSMB of CFFTI z CF Clinical Trial CTI02001: Efficacy Measurements z Nasal potential difference measurements baseline days z 2, 3, 4, 7, 14 (or longer if + at day 14) Nasal cell scrapings days 4, 14 – vector DNA (PCR) – vector CFTR mRNA (RT-PCR) – endogenous CFTR and GAPDH (RT-PCR) Vector DNA Transfection of Nasal Epithelial Cells 6/6 3/6 6/6 0.01 0 DNA DLIII high 6/6 0.1 SALINE DLIII low D14 1 DNA DLI/II D3 TOTAL 10 SALINE DLI/II DOSE LEVEL NUMBER OF SUBJECTS + DNA COPY NUMBER/CELL Day 14 (both nostrils) Nasal Potential Difference Analysis z SOP from CFF Therapeutics Development Network z Tracings scrambled and read by impartial observer z Data finalized before code broken z 7/126 tracings scored as invalid catheter movement, excessive signal to noise ratio Nasal Potential Difference Measurements Normal and CF Baseline Values CF Iso response no values < -5 mV Normal Iso response mean ± SD = -9.6 ± 5.1 95% CI = -11.0 to -8.2 Standaert, TA et al. Pediatr Pulmonol 37:385-392, 2004 Nasal Potential Difference Correction Pre-treatment Day 3 Amiloride mV mV Amiloride Zero Cl ATP Iso Zero Cl ATP Iso -9 mV 0 mV 1 min 3 time (min) 6 9 0 10 mV 10 mV 0 1 min 3 time (min) 6 9 Nasal Potential Difference Measurements by Dose Level Number of Subjects 4 ≥ -5 mvolts < -5 mvolts 3 2 1 0 DL I DL II DL III NPD Corrections Data from Both Nostrils normal 95% CI delta NPD(iso) (mV) 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -30 Baseline mean Days 1-7 Day 13 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 CF Development Plan z z z z z É Aerosol development of compacted DNA Promoter refinement of payload plasmid Repetitive dosing studies Surrogate assay development for CFTR chloride channel (suitable for intrapulmonary trial) Currently dosing intubated rabbits in IND-directed efficacy, toxicology, and DNA biodistribution studies Phase I intrapulmonary aerosol trial ~Q405 Compacted DNA Aerosols % of Total Recovered DNA Battelle Study N104881 Cascade Impactor Filters 35 Alveoli Proximal Airw ay 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 <0.6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >12 Mean Droplet Size (μm) Aeroneb Run # 1 Aeroneb Run # 2 Pari Run # 1 Pari Run # 2 DNA Nanoparticle Aerosols Retain Structural and Functional Integrity HepG2 transfection with compacted luciferase DNA before or after aerosolization RLU/mg protein 10000000 before 1000000 100000 10000 1000 before 10ng 1ng 10ng 100 nm 1ng mock 100 after PD-IN072503 Luciferase Data, Day 2 Collection after 100 nm MMAD 4.0 microns +/- 2.1 RLU/mg protein 10 6 10 5 10 4 10 3 10 2 saline before after Plasmid Promoter Evaluation in Mice Following Intrapulmonary Administration Geometric Means of RLU/mg protein (±SEM) PD-IN102402 10 5 RT285 CMV RT277 pUb Saline *** *** 10 4 10 3 10 2 2 7 14 28 Collection Day 35 *** p<0.001 Collaborative studies with Dr. Deborah Gill and colleagues, University of Oxford Maintenance of Biologic Activity After Repeat Intrapulmonary Dose Administration Dosing Protocol PD-IN120503 Repeat Dosing #2 Luciferase Data 10 7 3 weeks 3 weeks saline CFTR saline saline luc CFTR 3 weeks CFTR luc Group 2. saline luc Group 3. saline saline saline 10 6 2d saline Group 4. RLU/mg protein CFTR Group 1. CFTR 10 5 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 harvest p4 4 u o x Gr line sa p1 1 p2 ! p3 1 u u u x o x o o x Gr luc Gr , luc Gr luc , , x2 x3 x3 R e R T in FT sal CF C , x1 e n i sal Pipeline Clinical Indications for “Non-Targeted” Nanoparticles z z z z z z z Intrinsic Lung Disease cystic fibrosis asthma, COPD, α1-AT deficiency, etc. Lung as Bioreactor hemophilia A and B cancer (anti-metastases peptides), etc. Viral Lung Infections (influenza model) Parkinson’s disease Ophthalmology Cancer Neovasculature Payloads: DNA, RNA, siRNA Compacted DNA Nanoparticles z Highly efficient in vivo gene transfer (post-mitotic cells) z z z z up to 20-fold more efficient than any viral vector in some tissues Efficient and reproducible formulation manufactured with readily available cGMP raw materials Stable >3 years 4oC; 9 months RT Non-toxic and non-immunogenic; repeat dosing is possible Encouraging results in human CF clinical trial É NEW CLASS OF THERAPEUTICS WITH ATTRIBUTES OF TRADITIONAL PHARMACEUTICALS Counterion of PEG-substituted Polycation Influences Shape of DNA Nanoparticles HCO3 Acetate 100 nm 100 nm Chloride TFA 100 nm 100 nm Benign Preclinical Toxicology z High Dose (30-fold higher than highest dose in trial) z Low Dose (3-fold higher than highest dose in trial) z z trace to 1+ mononuclear cell infiltrate around pulmonary veins no peribronchial or alveolar infiltrates no histologic findings no blood test abnormalities, including complement minimal BAL cytokine induction after intrapulmonary dose no/minimal CpG island response