   A k A

advertisement
MSE 510
Part 4: Heterojunctions - MOS Devices
 MOS Device Uses:
MOSCAP – capacitor: storing charge, charge-coupled device (CCD), etc.
MOSFET – transistor: switch, current amplifier, dynamic random access
memory (DRAM-volatile), NVM (non-volatile memory), etc.
 Present day Challenges - Ultrathin SiO2: begin to observe quantum
effects
+ Vgate
VSource
M
VDrain
W
+
poly-crystalline
Si
O
n++ Poly Si
Gate Contact
or Electrode
Source Contact
Insulator
S
Drain Contact
Insulator
SiO2 - Gate oxide
n+source - - - - - - - - - - - - - - n+drain
channel
p-Si Wafer
Crystalline Si
tox
L
Cox 
 o r A
Knowlton
tox

 o kox A
tox
1
MSE 510
MOSFET Current – Voltage Characteristics
IDS (mA)
ID (mA)
VDS(sat)
VGS=10V
10
VDS = 20 V
10
Saturation, ID  IDS
8V
5
6V
5V
4V
0
5
Vth = 4 V
0
0
10
VDS
(a)
20
30
0
Kasap, Fig. 6.38, p. 538
5
VGS
10
(b)
(a) Typical ID vs VDS characteristics of an enhancement MOSFET
(Vth = 4 V) for various fixed gate voltages VGS.
(b) Dependence of ID on VGS at a given VDS ( >V DS(sat)).
I D    Cox
Knowlton
2

VDS
W
VGS  VT VDS 
 ; (+ = nMOS; - = pMOS)
L
2 
I Dsat    Cox
W
2
VGS  VT  ; (+ = nMOS; - = pMOS)
2L
Fig. From Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices, Third Edition, S.O. Kasap (© McGraw-Hill, 2005)
2
1
MSE 510
m < sc
Ee-M
Heterojunctions - MOS
O
S
Evac
M
O
S
Ee-
Ec
Ec
sc sc
m
Ef,m
Eg
eVFB
Ec
Eg
Ec
Eg E
f,s/c
Ev
Φs band
bendinginSi
Eg
Ef,m
Ef,s/c
Ev
p-Si
Ev
Ev
p-Si
eVox bandbending
SiO2
inoxide
SiO2
eVFB eVox Φs
Flat band
Equilibrium
Depletion
Regime
Knowlton
3
MSE 510
m > sc
M
Ee-
Heterojunctions - MOS
O
S
sio2
M O
Ee-
Ec
sc sc
m
Eg
Eg
eVFB
Ef,m
Evac
M
S
eVox bandbendinginoxide
Ec
Ef,s/c
Ev
Φs bandbendinginSi
Eg
Ec
Eg
Ef,m
p-Si
Ef,s/c
Ev
p-Si
Ev
SiO2
Ec
Ev
SiO2
eVFB eVox Φs
Flat band
Knowlton
Equilibrium
Accumulation
Regime
4
2
Heterojunctions
MOSCAP
MSE 510
m < sc
EeM O
Eg
qVA
Ee- M
S
Eg
O
Φs band
bendingin
Si
Ec
Ef,s/c
Ev
Ee- M
S
Eg
Ec
Eg
qVA
eVox band
eVox band
Inversion
Ec
Eg
p-Si
p-Si
bendingin
SiO2
Φs band
bendingin
Si
A
bendingin
Si
SiO2
Eg
S
Ef,s/c qV
Φs band
Ef,m
O
Ef,s/c
Ev
p-Si
bendingin
SiO2
SiO2
Accumulation
SiO2
Very strong
accumulation
Knowlton
5
MSE 510
Heterojunctions - MOS
Knowlton
Neaman, Semiconductor Devices
6
3
MSE 510
Ee-
m < sc
Heterojunctions
MOSCAP
Ee-
qVA
Depletion
Accumulation
Knowlton
Ee-
qVA
Very strong
accumulation
7
Heterojunctions
MOSCAP
MSE 510
Ee-
Knowlton
8
4
MSE 510
m < sc
Heterojunctions: MOSCAP
q  SiO2
Ee-
Ee-
q  Si qSi
qm
qF
Depletion
Depletion
Knowlton
Heterojunctions: MOSCAP
MSE 510
Ee-
q  SiO2
Ee-
At Si/SiO2
Interface:
p=n
q  Si qSi
qm
So: Ef = Ei
qVA =q VG
qs
[
]
qF
qF
NOTE:
Flat Band:
qF
s= surface potential
Knowlton
9
depletion
s = F
Ei
Ef
qF 
At Flat Band, no Surface
Potential, qs, exists. But,
when Ef coincides with Ei
at the interface, then qF = qs
F

N
kT
ln D o p a n t
q
ni
onset of inversion
10
5
Heterojunctions: MOSCAP
MSE 510
Assume: m < sc
Ee- or S
Oxide S/C
F
Ec
F
Ei
F
F
 F
Ef & EA
Ev
F
Knowlton
1Colinge
MSE 510
& Colinge, Physics of Semiconductor Devices (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002 ) p. 178-179, 182-183
11
Heterojunctions: MOSCAP
EeColinge & Colinge, Physics of Semiconductor Devices (Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 2002 )
At Si/SiO2
Interface:
Ef = Ei
qVG
q F
s = F
s = F = ms – Vox + VG
Knowlton
onset of inversion
F 
kT
N
ln A
q
ni
VG = s – ms + Vox = F – ms + Vox
12
6
Heterojunctions: MOSCAP
MSE 510
[1]
[1]
One might think that the definition for the threshold of inversion should be the onset of inversion
…
BUT IT IS NOT. There are varying opinions on this!
Onset of strong inversion: S = F
Threshold of inversion2,6 , Onset of strong inversion3 or Onset of strong inversion1,2,4,5: S = 2F
When: S = 2F, Vg = VT
s = 2F = ms – Vox + VT
F 
VG = s – ms + Vox = 2F – ms + Vox
kT
N
ln A
q
ni
1Colinge
& Colinge, Physics of Semiconductor Devices (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002 ) p. 178-179, 182-183
2Anderson & Anderson, Fundamentals of Semiconductor Devices, (McGraw Hill, 2005) p. 394
3Muller & Kamins, Device Electronics for Integrated Circuits, 3rd Ed. (Wiley, 2003) p. 390-392
4Streetman & Banerjee, Solid State Electronic Devices, 5th Ed (Prentice Hall, 2000) p.263-275
5Taur & Ning, Fundamentals of Modern VLSI Devices, (Cambridge, ) p..58-74; 6Kasap, Prin. Of Electronic Materials & Devices 3rd Ed (McGraw Hill,, 2006) p. 540
Knowlton
13
Heterojunctions: MOSCAP
MSE 510
Assume: m < sc
O S
Ee-
Ec
ED
Ei
EA & Ef
Ev
Flatband
F
2F
F
Depletion
[1]
At Si/SiO2
Interface:
Ef = Ei
n=p
onset of
inversion
S = F
At Si/SiO2
Interface:
Ef = ED
n = NA
At Si/SiO2
Interface:
Ef > ED
threshold of
inversion
Inversion
Or
Onset of
Strong
Inversion
strong
S = 2F
Knowlton
14
7
MSE 510
Heterojunctions: MOSCAP
 Threshold Voltage: Vt
VT,start: modeled by MEDICI, a TCAD program
VT,2F: VT at 2F
VT,extrapol: extrapolated VT
Knowlton
MSE 510
D. Schroder, Semiconductor Material & Device Characterization 2rd Ed (Wiley Interscience, 1998) p. 242
15
Heterojunctions: MOSCAP
[4]
[1]
[3]
[5]
Something is important when: S = 2F
Inversion takes over depletion & Ef=ED
1Colinge
& Colinge, Physics of Semiconductor Devices (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002 ) p. 178-179, 182-183
& Anderson, Fundamentals of Semiconductor Devices, (McGraw Hill, 2005) p. 394
& Kamins, Device Electronics for Integrated Circuits, 3rd Ed. (Wiley, 2003) p. 390-392
& Banerjee, Solid State Electronic Devices, 5th Ed (Prentice Hall, 2000) p.263-275
5Taur & Ning, Fundamentals of Modern VLSI Devices, (Cambridge, ) p..58-74
2Anderson
3Muller
Knowlton
4Streetman
16
8
Heterojunctions: MOSCAP
MSE 510
Degenerate
Ef is in the CB
Degenerate
Ef is in the VB
0ΦF
2ΦF
1ΦF
VT
VFB
Knowlton
5Taur
Eg
Something is important when: S = 2F
Inversion takes over depletion & Ef=ED
& Ning, Fundamentals of Modern VLSI Devices, (Cambridge, ) p..58-74
17
MSE 510
Heterojunctions: MOSCAP
 Capacitance – Voltage:
C
Q
Q
or
V

[5]
[4]
Ei VT
[1]
1Colinge
& Colinge, Physics of Semiconductor Devices (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002 ) p. 178-179, 182-183
& Anderson, Fundamentals of Semiconductor Devices, (McGraw Hill, 2005) p. 394
& Kamins, Device Electronics for Integrated Circuits, 3rd Ed. (Wiley, 2003) p. 390-392
& Banerjee, Solid State Electronic Devices, 5th Ed (Prentice Hall, 2000) p.263-275
5Taur & Ning, Fundamentals of Modern VLSI Devices, (Cambridge, ) p..58-74
2Anderson
3Muller
Knowlton
4Streetman
18
9
MSE 510
Heterojunctions: MOSCAP
 Capacitance – Voltage:
C
Q
Q
or
V

0ΦF
1ΦF
2ΦF
[4]
Ei
Knowlton
MSE 510
Ee-
4Streetman
VT
& Banerjee, Solid State Electronic Devices, 5th Ed (Prentice Hall, 2000) p.263-275
19
Heterojunctions: MOSCAP
Ee-
Ee-
VA = VG
VA
At Si/SiO2
Interface:
Ef = Ei
depletion
Knowlton
onset of inversion
At Si/SiO2
Interface:
Ef >> Ei
strong inversion
20
10
Heterojunctions
MOSCAP
MSE 510
Ee-
Knowlton
21
MSE 510
Heterojunctions
Ee-
e-
Drain (V+)
eGate
ee-
Source (V-) e
-
MOSFET
Knowlton
22
11
MSE 510
MOSFET Current – Voltage Characteristics
IDS (mA)
ID (mA)
VDS(sat)
VGS=10V
10
VDS = 20 V
10
Saturation, ID  IDS
8V
5
5
6V
5V
4V
0
Vth = 4 V
0
0
10
VDS
(a)
20
30
0
Kasap, Fig. 6.38, p. 538
5
VGS
10
(b)
(a) Typical ID vs VDS characteristics of an enhancement MOSFET
(Vth = 4 V) for various fixed gate voltages VGS.
(b) Dependence of ID on VGS at a given VDS ( >V DS(sat)).
I D    Cox
Knowlton
MSE 510
2

VDS
W
VGS  VT VDS 
 ; (+ = nMOS; - = pMOS)
L
2 
I Dsat    Cox
W
2
VGS  VT  ; (+ = nMOS; - = pMOS)
2L
Fig. From Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices, Third Edition, S.O. Kasap (© McGraw-Hill, 2005)
23
Heterojunctions
MOSCAP
depletion
Knowlton
Neaman, Semiconductor Devices
24
12
Download