Boise State University
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
EE 482, Senior Design Project
Spring 2007
Lewandowski Wind Farm Project
Final Report
Date Due:
04/30/07
Date Submitted: 04/30/07
Instructor: Robert Hay
Advisor:
Dr. Ahmed-Zaid
Sponsor: G3, LLC
Group Members: Chris Raymes
Mike McKee
Team Number:
4
EE 482
Technical Document
Spring 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.
2.
3.
4.
ABSTRACT......................................................................................................................... 3
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 4
PROBLEMS AND APPROACHES ...................................................................................... 4
AUTO SYNCHRONOUS CONTROLLER (ASC) THEORY ................................................. 4
4.1
System Overview ......................................................................................................... 4
4.2
System Components.................................................................................................... 5
4.3
Operational Theory ...................................................................................................... 6
4.4
Matlab/Simulink Model ................................................................................................10
5. LEWANDOWSKI WIND FARM ASC HARDWARE CONFIGURATION..............................11
5.1
Site Overview..............................................................................................................11
5.2
FCOG-6100 Firing Board with Gamma Regulator Board.............................................11
5.3
Silicon Controlled Rectifiers ........................................................................................13
5.4
Transient Surge Suppression Board ...........................................................................13
6. FUNCTIONAL LABORATORY MODEL .............................................................................14
6.1
System Overview ........................................................................................................14
6.2
System Hardware Configuration .................................................................................14
6.3
Basic Operational Theory and Instructions..................................................................15
6.4
Initial Testing Results and Current Functional Status ..................................................18
7. FUTURE RESEARCH AND TESTING...............................................................................19
8. CONCLUSION...................................................................................................................20
9. AKNOWLEDGEMENTS.....................................................................................................20
10.
APPENDICIES ...............................................................................................................21
10.1
APPENDIX A – ASC CONNECTION DIAGRAM .....................................................21
10.2
APPENDIX B – FCOG6100 FIRING BOARD DETAILS...........................................22
10.3
APPENDIX D – LABORATORY MODEL CONNECTION DIAGRAM.......................25
10.4
APPENDIX E – EAGLE SCHEMATIC/LAYOUT FOR SCR BOARD........................27
10.5
APPENDIX F – REFERENCES...............................................................................29
2
EE 482
Technical Document
Spring 2007
1. ABSTRACT
As the need for environmentally sustainable energy sources become more important, wind
energy has developed into an attractive supplement to conventional technologies. The focus of
the project is to develop a comprehensive understanding of the functionality of the main
generator and associated controls common to all three wind turbines at the Lewandowski wind
farm. The primary intent of the project is to help expand a research based relationship between
Boise State University and the wind farm owners.
The project was divided into three main tasks. The initial task involved extensive research into
the current functionality and hardware configurations of the wind turbine systems. This was
accomplished through site visits, communication with the owners, and researching the details of
the hardware components presently used in the systems. The second task involved the
construction of a scaled system model in a laboratory environment. The final task was the
development this detailed technical document to be provided to the university and the owners
documenting the findings of the project team.
The Lewandowski wind farm uses the ENERPRO Auto Synchronous Controller (ASC) control
system1 to coordinate generator tie-in/off of the utility grid. The ASC control system takes
advantage of the tendency of induction generators to self-excite when driven above
synchronous speed and is based on the concept of utilizing a fixed gate delay (firing angle)
thyristor controller; a concept originally developed at the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA). The underlying theory is related to the relationship between an induction
machine’s power factor and slip interacting with an opposing thyristor pair fired at a large fixed
firing angle2.
ENERPRO literature suggests that the ASC control system provides smooth ramp-up/down
transitions, improved generator efficiency, and reduces inrush current from typical values of
12.0 times the rated generator current for conventional contactor control to 2.0 times the rated
generator operating current3. This document and the related research will create a foundation
for further research and testing of the performance and characteristics of the ENERPRO ASC
system as implemented at the Lewandowski Wind Farm.
3
EE 482
Technical Document
Spring 2007
2. INTRODUCTION
This document will first describe the scope of the Lewandowski wind farm project and the
approaches taken by the project team to solve the problems presented in the scope. Secondly,
the document will describe in detail the functionality of the ENERPRO Auto Synchronous
Controller (ASC) control system including an overview of the ASC control system, a description
of all ASC control system hardware components, and the operational theory behind the ASC
control system. Third, the document will describe the ASC control system hardware
configuration as implemented at the Lewandowski wind farm. Fourth, the document will explain
in detail the ASC laboratory system model as built by the project team including a system
overview, system hardware configuration, operational theory and instructions as well as system
testing and results. Next, the document will suggest future research that the project team feels
is important for expanding the understanding of the ASC system. Finally, the document will
conclude with a review of the project team’s accomplishments with regards to the project scope.
3. PROBLEMS AND APPROACHES
The Lewandowski wind farm consists of three wind turbines built by the late Robert
Lewandowski on land located southeast of Boise. Mr. Lewandowski passed away July of 2005
and left very little documentation regarding the details of his three wind turbines. On April 28,
2006, the newly formed corporation G3, LLC purchased the wind farm4. The goal of the project
is to deliver this technical document to Boise State University and G3, LLC explaining in detail
how the main 108 kW generator control system works as implemented in each turbine at the
wind farm in order to advance further research. Two approaches were used to create this
document:
•
Research as much of the existing system components as possible through site visits,
hardware manufacturer communication and literature, journal articles, and patents.
•
Construct a model of the system using similar hardware scaled to run in a laboratory
environment to acquire a better understanding of the system such that the hardware
configuration can be easily integrated into future research.
4. AUTO SYNCHRONOUS CONTROLLER (ASC) THEORY
4.1 System Overview
The Auto Synchronous Controller (ASC) is a wind turbine induction generator
connect/disconnect controller that utilizes the interaction of thyristors/silicon controlled rectifiers
(SCR’s) and generator slip (difference between the synchronous speed and the operating speed
of the generator) to coordinate generator tie-in/off to the utility grid. The system is referred to as
an Auto Synchronous Controller because the connect/disconnect operation occurs automatically
as the generator speed rises above and falls below synchronous, where synchronous speed is
the threshold below which the induction machine performs as a motor (positive slip, S) and
above which the machine functions as a generator (negative slip, S)5.
The ASC control system is enabled at 98% of the machine’s synchronous speed by a shaft
speed limit switch. When the system is enabled, a bias of approximately 25% of the rated AC
utility mains voltage is applied to the generator stator windings by firing the thyristors at an angle
4
EE 482
Technical Document
Spring 2007
of greater than 120°, thus pre-biasing the generator with reduced motoring torque. As the
generator shaft speed exceeds the machine’s synchronous speed by a typical value of 0.5%,
the generator’s power factor angle (difference between the voltage and current angles)
converges on the thyristor firing angle forcing the thyristors into full conduction and bringing the
generator online with full utility mains voltage applied to the stator windings. If the shaft speed
drops below the generator’s synchronous speed, the system automatically reverts to the prebias state to minimize motoring. When the shaft speed falls below the 98% speed switch
threshold, the pre-bias is removed from the stator windings and the system shuts down.
According to literature provided by ENERPRO, Inc. the ASC control system provides smooth
ramp-up/down transitions, reducing inrush current from typical values of 12.0 times the rated
generator current for conventional contactor control to 2.0 times the rated generator operating
current6.
In addition to reduced inrush current at start-up, ENERPRO literature maintains that the ASC
control system improves the efficiency of generators used in wind turbine applications. Wind
powered generators are sized to operate at typical wind velocities of 50 mph, and therefore the
generators are substantially oversized for the more typical values of 10-25 mph generally
encountered in the wind farm environment. Consequently wind generators are somewhat
inefficient when operating in light winds. ENERPRO literature claims that the ASC control
system applies lower than rated voltage to the generator in light winds, effectively reducing its
internal electrical losses and increasing its net power output7.
4.2 System Components
As shown in Figure 1, the ASC control system consists of a thyristor switching assembly, a
thyristor firing board, a gamma regulator board that provides feedback control for the thyristor
firing angle, and transient surge suppression circuits that protect the thyristors from over-voltage
during switching.
5
Technical Document
Auto Synchronous
Controller
Spring 2007
Transient Surge
Suppression Board
Line Side
Voltages
Load Side
Voltages
EE 482
108 kW Generator
Connection
480V AC Protected Grid Connection
Load Side
Voltages
Gate Pulses
Line Side
Voltages
Thyristor Array
Board Power 120V AC
Pre-Synchronous Enable
Status
Manual/Motor
FCOG-6100 Firing Board
Hold-off angle, γ
GRB-1 Gamma
Regulator Board
New firing angle, α
Figure 1: Block Diagram Showing ASC System Hardware Components
4.3 Operational Theory
What follows is a summary of the operational theory for the ENERPRO ASC control system as
understood by the project team. These results were acquired through comprehensive research
of the existing system components by means of a site visit and hardware manufacturer
communication, in addition to literature resources including journal articles and patents.
The ASC control system takes advantage of the tendency of the generator to self-excite when
driven above synchronous speed. The concept of induction generator self-excitation with a fixed
gate delay angle thyristor controller is based on a patent by National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) engineer Frank J. Nola8 of which ENERPRO, Inc. of Goleta, CA is the
sole licensee.
Although the physical ASC control system does not explicitly utilize a fixed gate delay (firing
angle), the system’s fundamental operational theory is directly related to this concept. The
underlying theory is based on the relationship between an induction machine’s power factor and
slip interacting with an opposing thyristor pair fired at a large fixed firing angle. The opposing
6
EE 482
Technical Document
Spring 2007
thyristor pair is modeled as a slip dependent variable inductance according to studies found in
Auto Synchronous Controller Operation: Theory and Test Results by Frank J. Bourbeau of
ENERPRO, Inc. The ENERPRO literature regarding this theory then uses a fixed firing angle (α)
of 140° applied to the gate of an opposing thyristor pair connected in series with a single phase
equivalent circuit of an induction machine to model the ASC control system as shown in Figure
2.
Figure 2 - single phase equivalent circuit
9
For the ASC and induction machine equivalent circuit shown in Figure 3 with a positive slip
value of 0.5 %, the machine’s power factor angle (Ф) is confined to quadrant I (i.e. 0° ≤ Ф ≤ 90°)
due to a positive rotor resistance parameter (inversely proportional to slip) and therefore has not
converged on the thyristor firing angle when fixed at 140°. In this ideal situation the thyristors
are open circuited and no voltage is applied to the induction machine.
Figure 3 - speed = 1791 rpm, S = .005, Ф = 80°
10
α =140°, thyristors act as an open circuit
7
EE 482
Technical Document
Spring 2007
For the ASC and induction machine equivalent circuit shown in Figure 4 with a negative slip
value of -1.5 %, the rotor resistance parameter is negative (machine is acting as a generator)
and therefore the machine’s power factor angle moves to quadrant II (i.e. 90° ≤ Ф ≤ 180°) and
eventually converges on the fixed thyristor firing angle at 140°. As the generator’s power factor
angle converges on the fixed firing angle the thyristors become short circuited and the voltage
applied to the generator approaches the utility mains voltage.
Figure 4- speed = 1827 rpm, S = -.015, Ф = 140°
11
α = 140°, thyristors become short circuit
Based on the ASC and induction machine equivalent circuit, the voltage-slip profile for the
induction machine shown in Figure 5 indicates that the potential across the stator windings
increases linearly from a slip value of 0.5% to a slightly negative slip value and then increases
exponentially until the full system voltage is placed across the stator windings at a slip value of
approximately -1.5%.
Figure 5 – Generator (Eg) voltage versus Slip (S)
8
12
EE 482
Technical Document
Spring 2007
The physical ASC control system functionality is based on the phenomenon of induction
generator self-excitation with a fixed gate delay angle thyristor controller with several important
differences. The system is designed to enable with a slip of 2% (rotor RPM 98% of
synchronous). Based on the profile indicated in Figure 5, it is reasonable to assume that a slip
of 2% would yield zero generator voltage. However, a potentiometer on the gamma regulator
board allows the ASC to be field configured such that a pre-bias equal to 25% of rated system
voltage is applied to the machine at 2% slip. This pre-bias state excites the machine with
negligible motoring losses to aid in full excitation when the slip goes negative and the generator
power factor angle Ф converges on the thyristor firing angle α.
Another important difference is related to stability augmentation and efficiency. According to
Auto Synchronous Controller Operation: Theory and Test Results by Frank J. Bourbeau,
ENERPRO, Inc. the fixed firing angle control method proved to be unstable in certain wind
conditions. To compensate, feedback control is implemented to increase the firing angle as the
generator voltage increases. ENERPRO literature suggests that the feedback control also
allows the ASC to apply a lower than rated voltage to the generator in light winds, effectively
converting the over-sized generator into an electrically smaller machine, reducing its internal
electrical losses and increasing power output.
To implement this control, ENERPRO uses a thyristor firing board (FCOG6100), a gamma
regulator board (GRB-1), and a transient surge suppression board (TSB-3). The firing board
supplies the gate pulses to a thyristor array enabling the system. The thyristor gating is enabled
by speed switch contacts connected to the firing board. The system is enabled at 98% of the
generator’s synchronous speed. Firing angle modulation is made possible by monitoring the
hold-off angle γ, where γ is equal to half of the difference between the thyristor firing angle α
and the generator power factor angle Ф. The gamma regulator board measures the hold-off
angle by monitoring the thyristor cathode voltages passed through the firing board thyristor
connections.
9
EE 482
Technical Document
Spring 2007
4.4 Matlab/Simulink Model
MATLAB with Simulink proved useful in verifying details regarding ASC operation. The single
phase model shown in Figure 6 was used to simulate the pre-bias state when the ASC has just
been enabled at 98% of synchronous speed. It was found that a large firing angle of 149° setup
a pre-bias state of 25% of rated voltage confirming ENERPRO theory and literature.
Single Phase Model of an Induction Machine with SCR Control (Fixed Firing Angle)
1764
Pulse
Generator
i
-
g
m
a
k
shaft speed
Xp = 1e-3
Thyristor
m
g
k
a
N
fcn
R
R(s)
Xs = 1e-3
Thyristor1
+
R
+
Is
+
-
Xm = 1e-3
Vload
-
480Vrms
Variable Resistor
v
Scope
signal rms
120
Display
RMS
Xp = primary leakage inductance
Xm = magnetizing inductance
Xs = secondary leakage inductance
R = rotor resistance
S = slip = 1 - N/1800
Assumptions:
synchronous speed: 1800rpm
firing angle (fixed): 149 degrees
system voltage: 480Vrms L-L
pre-bias generator voltage: 120Vrms L-L
Figure 6: Simulink ASC and Induction Machine Single Phase Equivalent Model
10
R/S, R=1
EE 482
5.
Technical Document
Spring 2007
LEWANDOWSKI WIND FARM ASC HARDWARE CONFIGURATION
5.1 Site Overview
The site overview will provide a synopsis of the ASC control system configurations for the
control systems common to each of three main 108 kW generators as implemented at the
Lewandowski wind farm. Further specification and configuration detail regarding each of the
ASC control system components will be discussed in Sections 5.2, 5.3, and 5.4.
A very close approximation to what is believed to be implemented on site is shown in an
ENERPRO drawing in Appendix A. Similar to this drawing, each of the three main 108 kW
generator systems utilizes a 480V AC three phase connection to the utility grid and a 120V AC
single phase interface to the ASC control system. Like the field configuration, the ENERPRO
drawing in Appendix A shows an interposing relay connection (enable relay K1) used to enable
the ASC system at 98% of synchronous speed. As shown in Figure 7 each of the turbine control
systems utilizes a high speed counter process indicator connected to a proximity sensor, as
shown in Figure 8 to monitor rotor speed. The high speed counter process indicator has a
programmable high or low limit (depending on internal and interposing relay configuration, i.e.
N.O. or N.C. contacts) to allow system enabling when rotor speed reaches 98% of the
machine’s synchronous speed. It is important to note that on site a parallel capacitive load is
connected to the generator using a motor contactor. It is not clear how this affects the system
operation and when the capacitive load is connected on site; this will be discussed in Section 7.
Figure 7: High Speed Counter Process
Indicator
Figure 8: Shaft Proximity Sensor
5.2 FCOG-6100 Firing Board with Gamma Regulator Board
As per the ENERPRO ordering guide for the three-phase thyristor firing board including GRB-1,
the on site component specific part number is: FCOG-6100-02-0-60-1-48-2-1.13 The specific
part number for the firing board contains a “1” in the field “used with regulator.” This field
specifies a firing board with J6 populated with a connection header used for interface with a
regulator board; on site a gamma regulator board is used.14 The specific part number for the
regulator board is: GRB-1A.
11
EE 482
Technical Document
Spring 2007
Unlike the board used to construct the laboratory model, to be presented in Section 6, each
control system firing board used on site utilizes solder bridges instead of a DIP switch package
to configure the PP1 header as shown in Figure 9. These settings are used to provide phase
reference and gate pulse profile selection. Table 1 gives the PP1 header settings as field
configured for the firing board as shown in Figure 915.
Table 1: PP1 Header Settings as Field Configured for the FCOG-6100 Firing Board
PP1 Position
Setting
1
Open
2
Open
3
Open
4
Close
5
Close
6
Close
7
Open
8
Close
PP1 positions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 are used to program the systems PLL (phase locked loop)
settings with respect to the systems phase reference. The settings in Table 1 yield a
configuration suitable for AC controllers with high power factor loads. PP1 positions 7 and 8 are
used to program the SCR’s gate pulse profile. The settings in Table 1 yield a “mode 1” profile
such that the firing board delivers 120° bursts of 128 pulses (23,040 Hz carrier frequency) to the
SCR’s16.
The gamma regulator board incorporates a potentiometer (R1) to adjust the pre-bias voltage for
the generator. The potentiometer is to be adjusted to give approximately 120 VRMS line-to-line
(25% of rated) generator voltage at zero speed. This measurement must be made with a true
RMS reading voltmeter.17
Figure 9: FCOG6100 with GRB-1 Showing Solder Bridges for PP1 Header Settings
12
EE 482
Technical Document
Spring 2007
5.3 Silicon Controlled Rectifiers
Two silicon control rectifier (thyristor) packages are used on site manufactured from
International Rectifier and POWEREX. The International Rectifier part used on site is known
and is: IRKT250-16, however this part number is listed as divested from the manufacturer
website and is not available. Each is mounted on the side of the enclosure with a large heat sink
perforating through the enclosure, as seen in Figure 10. Three thyristor devices are used in
each control system, each containing an opposing thyristor pair. The two gate drive signals and
cathode feedback connections can been seen on each device in Figure 10 as a small connector
with a red and white wire on the top of the SCR package (one connector for each internal SCR).
The firing board has two connectors, J1 and J2, used for SCR gating and feedback. The
FCOG6100 schematic, shown in Appendix B, details the connection information required for
wiring the firing board to the SCR devices.18
Figure 10: SCR Packages
5.4 Transient Surge Suppression Board
The exact part number for the transient surge suppression or snubber board used on site, as
shown in Figure 11, is not known. If the snubber board were to be replaced, the ENERPRO
equivalent component specific part number is: TSB-3B-550-30-35-20-0 Rev B. This information
was provided by communications with Engineering Sales Representative Patrick Marshall of
ENERPRO, Inc. given on the CD Appendix.
The transient surge suppression board (TSB) is designed to protect the SCR devices from overvoltage during switching. As detailed in Appendix A, each SCR paired device has two
connections to the snubber board, one on the line side of the SCR device and one on the load
side. The phase A SCR device is interfaced to the transient surge suppression board at TSB
header J3, pins 1 and 3; the phase B SCR device is interfaced to the snubber board at TSB
header J2, pins 1 and 3; and the phase C SCR device is interfaced to the transient surge
suppression board at TSB header J1, pins 1 and 3.
13
EE 482
Technical Document
Spring 2007
Figure 11: TSB or Snubber Board
6. FUNCTIONAL LABORATORY MODEL
6.1 System Overview
The project team constructed a scaled functional ASC model intended to be used as a research
tool to assist this project and to be provided as a resource for future wind energy projects at
Boise State University. The system uses similar ASC components to those used on site, but
designed to operate using 208V AC three phase versus 480V AC, as used on site. The model is
designed to interface with the Lab-Volt Industrial Machine Training System used at Boise State
University with a 0.25 Hp induction machine (wound rotor, or squirrel cage). A prime mover is
used to apply wind torque to the induction machine. This section will discuss the hardware
configuration, operational theory, and any useful results found due to laboratory testing.
6.2 System Hardware Configuration
An AutoCAD drawing of the ASC laboratory model schematic is shown in Appendix D. Figure 12
shows the physical wiring of the laboratory model including terminal blocks, SCR board,
FCOG6100 firing board with GRB-1; the transient surge suppression board is mounted directly
under the firing board and is not readily visible in Figure 12, however the connections to TSB
headers J1, J2 and J3 can be seen in Figure 12 as the three sets of two red conductors directly
under the FCOG6100 J1 and J2 headers (two sets of six blue conductors marked “J1” and “J2”).
The two source voltage inputs from the Lab-Volt power supply to the firing board can be seen in
Figure 12 as the two red conductors just above the transformer at FCOG6100 header J4 pins 1
and 5; this configuration yields the high voltage input option (208V) to the firing board. The ASC
control wiring can be seen in Figure 12 as the set of seven blue conductors below and to the left
of the transformer at FCOG6100 header J3; the firing board is also bonded to the laboratory
model enclosure through FCOG6100 header J3 at pin 8.
14
EE 482
Technical Document
Spring 2007
Figure 12: Scaled ASC Laboratory Model
The SCR board can be seen in Figure 12 as the printed circuit board (PCB) just to the left of the
firing board, where the six black devices are the heat sinks associated with each SCR. The SCR
printed circuit board was designed and assembled by the project team. Schematic and layout
information can be found in Appendix E. The SCR printed circuit board used in the laboratory
model was constructed using six (6) TO-220AB SCR packages (Digikey part number: 25TTS08ND), six (6) 5W heat sinks (Digikey part number: HS104-2-ND), six (6) heat sink pads (Digikey
part number: BER221-ND), and two (2) 12 position 5MM terminal blocks (Digikey part number:
277-1026-ND). The PCB design shown in Appendix E, including schematic and layout, was
completed using Eagle computer aided design (CAD) software19.
6.3 Basic Operational Theory and Instructions
Four critical components are needed for laboratory operation: Lab-Volt power supply, Lab-Volt
prime mover / dynamometer, Lab-Volt induction machine, and the ASC system. These are
shown in Figure 13. The ASC can be seen in the lower left corner. The prime mover /
dynamometer can be seen directly to the right of the ASC, and the induction machine can be
seen adjacent to the prime mover / dynamometer in the lower right hand corner. The power
supply can be seen directly above the ASC system. Also, directly above the induction machine,
a bi-directional Watt / VAR meter will be useful for power monitoring.
15
EE 482
Technical Document
Spring 2007
Figure 13: ASC, Power Supply, Prime Mover / Dynamometer, Wound Rotor Induction Machine,
and Watt / VAR Meter
The scaled model is designed to use a 0.25 HP wye-connected wound rotor or squirrel cage
induction machine to replicate the main generators used on site and a 208V AC three phase
connection to the laboratory power supply. A 120/208V transformer on the firing board provides
the 120V AC single phase interface to the ASC control system. The prime mover, used to
simulate wind torque, requires a 0-120 V DC speed control input and 120 V AC electronics
control input. The bi-directional Watt / VAR meter is used for power monitoring. The overall
laboratory system hardware configuration is shown in Figure 13.
Similar to the scaled laboratory model as constructed by the project team, the ENERPRO
drawing in Appendix A shows an interposing relay connection (enable relay K1) used to enable
the ASC system at 98% of synchronous speed. Unlike the site-configured ASC control systems
the laboratory model uses a manual system enable. The toggle switch labeled “system enable”
on the ASC model face plate, shown in Figure 14, will function as the manual system enable
when the prime mover reaches 1764 RPM or 98% of the induction machine’s synchronous
speed.
16
EE 482
Technical Document
Spring 2007
Figure 14: ASC Model Face Plate
The overall scaled model hardware setup configuration is shown in Figure 15. To initially setup
and operate the system, the system must be connected as shown in Figure 15, with the
exception of the optional encoder circuit. If the system is connected and preconfigured properly
(i.e. DIP switch positions) then it is possible to set the pre-bias potentiometer (R1) on the
gamma regulator board. While applying the 208V AC three phase to the input of the ASC and
manually enabling the ASC via the face plate toggle switch with the induction machine at zero
speed and no load torque applied, the potentiometer is to be adjusted until 25% of 208V (52V)
line-to-line is read across the generator connection with a true RMS voltmeter. After setting the
pre-bias voltage, the system is ready for basic operation.
To operate the system, use the variable DC supply to set the prime mover speed at 98% of
synchronous speed (1764 RPM). Four-pole induction machines are used, and therefore have a
synchronous speed of 1800 RPM. When the speed is 98% percent of synchronous speed, the
ASC should be manually enabled. In theory, it should be possible to manually increase the
prime mover speed slightly above synchronous and use the Watt / VAR meter to observe power
generation.
As shown in Appendix A, the ASC control system also has a motoring function enabled through
an external motoring contact. Some ENERPRO literature suggests that the motoring function
requires two resistors, one of which is 2 kΩ, and the other to be selected to provide the desired
output current with the motor switch closed. The system was designed to accommodate these
resistors. The motoring function was not used by the project team in its testing; any future
research involving the ASC motoring function may require additional information and calculation
when determining resistor values.
17
Technical Document
DC Speed
Control
Lab-Volt Primemover / Dynamometer, functioning as a primemover indicating shaft
speed controlled via variable DC voltage from Lab-Volt Power Supply
208V AC 3Ф
Line-to-Line
A&B
Encoder
Signals
Lab-Volt Power Supply, Using
Fixed 208V AC 3Ф Line-to-Line,
Variable 0-120V DC 8A
Relay Connection
Replacing
Manual Enable
Optional High Speed Counter with a
Quadrature Input with a
Programmable Limit
ASC System
Induction Machine
Watt / VAR
Instrumentation
Generator Excitation
Voltage / Generated
Power
Manu
al En
able
Generator Excitation
Voltage / Generated
Power
tus
le Sta
Enab
Manual
Motoring
Spring 2007
Applied Torque
Simulating
Wind
EE 482
Laboratory
Configuration
Figure 15: Laboratory Operational Configuration with Future Encoder Feedback Option
6.4 Initial Testing Results and Current Functional Status
The overall scaled model hardware underwent its initial test at the end of the project with
assistance from the project advisor. Although the system is not ready for full operation, the team
was very pleased with the results. All the team’s wiring, design and assembly proved to be
correct thanks to repeated checking and verification of the design. The ENERPRO hardware
was energized without any faults. The SCR board, designed by the team, functioned correctly
without any signs of excessive heating. The system wiring proved to be correct.
The majority of the testing was focused on setting the pre-bias voltage on the generator by
adjusting the potentiometer on the gamma regulator board. While 208V was applied to the ASC
and the generator was connected to the ASC output, the system was enabled at zero speed (no
prime mover speed applied). Potentiometer adjustments directly and significantly changed the
generator voltage showing that the firing angle was changing. The voltage however was not
adjustable down to the 25% (adjusted to about 140V) of rated line-to-line voltage. The team
believes this is due to the small size and characteristics of the unloaded generator in the lab,
versus a typical generator used in a power generation application.
18
EE 482
Technical Document
Spring 2007
The team believes it will take a significant amount of time to fully research the characteristics of
the induction machine used in the lab tests; specifically its power factor curve as a function of
slip. Referencing this information with future discussions with ENERPRO regarding the range
and capabilities of the gamma regulator board should yield successful results. The project team
has paved the path for these results by contacting the founder and president of ENERPRO, and
inventor of the ASC control system, Frank J. Bourbeau.
According to Mr. Bourbeau, the 0.25 HP machine will not be large enough to work as a scale
model induction generator. The appropriate voltage versus torque response will not be achieved
because the power factor and efficiency of the 0.25 HP induction machine are too small. As per
Mr. Bourbeau, the induction machine needs to at minimum 5 kW, and if possible a high
efficiency design. Future research will have to address these issues and concerns. Any
information received after the completion of this project will be forwarded to the project advisor.
7. FUTURE RESEARCH AND TESTING
After accounting for the induction machine sizing issue, future research and several physical
tests can be performed using the laboratory model. Some of the tests and research the project
team has considered are bulleted below:
• Observe the firing angle and power factor during various slip configurations.
• Test the system during very high speeds (simulating high wind) observing power factor,
power factor and firing angles.
• Test the system during slow speeds in order to verify ENERPRO’s efficiency claims
regarding generator de-rating.
• Test the effects of pre-bias voltage adjustments above and below 25% of rated voltage.
• Test the effects of enabling below or above the 98% of synchronous threshold.
• Observe and record the generator cut-in current profile in the lab under different conditions.
• Compare performance and research with other methods of control (contactor, traditional
soft-start, other wind controllers, etc.)
• Examine potential improvements gained by utilizing a programmable logic controller in
addition to the current ASC system.
• Test the effects of a parallel capacitive load on ASC operation to better understand the on
site configuration. As seen in Figure 16, Mr. Lewandowski utilized large capacitive loads in
parallel with the generator. This is assumed to affect power factor and consequently the
operational characteristics of the ASC system. This should be researched and tested in the
laboratory.
Figure 16: Capacitive Load as Implemented On Site
19
EE 482
Technical Document
Spring 2007
8. CONCLUSION
The project team has made significant progress in its understanding of the ASC system as
pertaining to the Lewandowski wind farm as well as laying the foundation for many laboratory
research opportunities. The team expects an improved understanding of the ASC system for
researchers at Boise State University and G3, LLC through its project efforts. As with most
research, this endeavor has revealed many questions regarding ASC operation as well as
significantly improving the understanding of the system. The team hopes that this work will lead
the way to answering some of the questions in Section 6, and others not conceived by the
research team, via future Senior Design and research projects at Boise State University. The
team feels that the project was very successful and its completion satisfies all scoped items.
9. AKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The project team is appreciative for the efforts of the following individuals:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Saul Rivera and Tony Limjoco, Design/ Engineering Managers with ENERPRO, Inc for
the technical information provided regarding ASC theory and operation
Frank J. Bourbeau, Founder and President, ENERPRO, Inc.
Ty Nelson, Sales Representative with Graybar Electric, Boise who provided the team
with terminal blocks and terminal block numbers
Dr. S.M. Loo and his research associates for their support in producing the SCR board
for the ASC laboratory model
Project advisor Dr. Said Ahmed-Zaid
Project sponsor Todd Haynes of G3, LLC
20
EE 482
10.
Technical Document
APPENDICIES
10.1
APPENDIX A – ASC CONNECTION DIAGRAM
21
Spring 2007
EE 482
10.2
Technical Document
APPENDIX B – FCOG6100 FIRING BOARD DETAILS
22
Spring 2007
EE 482
Technical Document
23
Spring 2007
EE 482
Technical Document
24
Spring 2007
EE 482
10.3
Technical Document
Spring 2007
APPENDIX D – LABORATORY MODEL CONNECTION DIAGRAM
25
EE 482
Technical Document
26
Spring 2007
EE 482
10.4
Technical Document
Spring 2007
APPENDIX E – EAGLE SCHEMATIC/LAYOUT FOR SCR BOARD
PCB Schematic:
PCB Bottom Layer:
27
EE 482
Technical Document
PCB Top Layer:
PCB Component Placement (Top):
28
Spring 2007
EE 482
10.5
Technical Document
Spring 2007
APPENDIX F – REFERENCES
1
www.enerpro-inc.com
Auto Synchronous Controller Operation: Theory and Test Results, Frank J. Bourbeau, ENERPRO, Inc,
September, 1991
3
Auto Synchronous Controller Operation: Theory and Test Results, Frank J. Bourbeau, ENERPRO, Inc,
September, 1991
4
IDWRreport_InhouseVersion, G3, LLC
5
Grid Connection with Auto Synchronous Controller, Frank J. Bourbeau, ENERPRO, Inc, October, 1987
6
Grid Connection with Auto Synchronous Controller, Frank J. Bourbeau, ENERPRO, Inc, October, 1987
7
Grid Connection with Auto Synchronous Controller, Frank J. Bourbeau, ENERPRO, Inc, October, 1987
8
Power Factor Control System for AC Induction Motors, Frank J. Nola, United States Patent No.
4,266,177, May 5, 1981
9
Auto Synchronous Controller Operation: Theory and Test Results, Frank J. Bourbeau, ENERPRO, Inc,
September, 1991
10
Auto Synchronous Controller Operation: Theory and Test Results, Frank J. Bourbeau, ENERPRO, Inc,
September, 1991
11
Auto Synchronous Controller Operation: Theory and Test Results, Frank J. Bourbeau, ENERPRO, Inc,
September, 1991
12
Auto Synchronous Controller Operation: Theory and Test Results, Frank J. Bourbeau, ENERPRO, Inc,
September, 1991
13
Three-Phase Thyristor Firing Board, Ordering Brochure, ENERPRO, Inc. 1994
14
Three-Phase Thyristor Firing Board, Ordering Brochure, ENERPRO, Inc. 1994
15
th
General Purpose 3Ø Firing Circuit, Dwg. No. E128 Sheets 1 and 2, ENERPRO, Inc. December, 18
1991
16
Operating Manual for a 6-SCR General Purpose Gate Firing Board, Part No. FCOG6100 REV. J, J’, J’’,
K, ENERPRO, Inc. October, 1993
17
th
Connection Diagram: Auto Synchronous Controller, Dwg. No. E497-5, , Inc., September, 24 1998
18
th
General Purpose 3Ø Firing Circuit, Dwg. No. E128 Sheets 1 and 2, ENERPRO, Inc. December, 18
1991
19
www.cadsoftusa.com
2
29