Biosynthetic Engineering for the Assembly of Better Drugs Vikramaditya Ganapati Yadav B. A. Sc. (Hons. Co-op.) Chemical Engineering, University of Waterloo (2007) Submitted to the Department of Chemical Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Chemical Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology ARCHIVES May 2013 MASSACHUSETTS INST - lfE Massachusetts Institute of Technology @2013 All rights reserved OF TECHN~OLOGY JUN 2913 L! F R ES Signature of the author 6oao Certified by F IF Ce e by - nt of Chemical Engineering 28 May 2013 . Gregory N. Stephanopoulos W.H.Dow Professor of Chemical Engineering & Biotechnology Thesis Advisor Accepted by Patrick S.Doyle Professor of Chemical Engineering Chairman, Committee for Graduate Students a Biosynthetic Engineering for the Assembly of Better Drugs Vikramaditya Ganapati Yadav Submitted to the Department of Chemical Engineering on May 28, 2013 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Chemical Engineering The declining prospects of innovator pharmaceutical companies have been attributed to their inability to discover leads that bind to novel protein domains. All of the 21,000-odd drug products that have ever been approved by the US FDA bind to just 130 of the over 10,000 functional protein domains that exist in the human body. The high degree of drug redundancy, in turn, stems from the industry's persistence with combinatorial chemistry to synthesize drug candidates. Not only is the chemical space being screened for biological activity usually one that has been previously interrogated, but the products of combinatorial chemistry too are simply not drug-like. So dire are the odds that launching a single synthetic compound necessitates screening as many as 100,000 molecules from a combinatorial library. In comparison, as many as 20 molecules of the 7,000-odd polyketide natural products that have been screened thus far have made it to the market. Nevertheless, drug companies remain underwhelmed as synthetic inaccessibility has heretofore stymied drug prospection in natural product space. However, recent applications of genetic approaches to decipher the biosynthetic code that guides the assembly of several natural product families have revealed that living systems methodically and repetitively combine carbohydrate-derived building blocks in metabolic unit reactions to generate unprecedented molecular diversity. By clustering combinations, permutations and mutations of these biosynthetic genes into operons to be expressed as heterologous metabolic pathways in tractable microbial hosts, one can readily generate pharmacophores that are more likely to bind to novel targets. Ordered combinations of known genes generate pharmacophores that are natural products in toto, whereas permutations and mutations produce molecules that possess a scaffold that is an unnatural isomer of a natural product. The atom economy of microbial synthesis of pharmaceutical intermediates and active ingredients also far exceeds those of conventional schemes. We recently demonstrated the feasibility of this new paradigm for drug discovery by integrating two of the four metabolic unit reactions involved in taxane assembly into the metabolism of E. coli to produce an unsubstituted, 20-carbon drug scaffold at 1 g/L titers. The taxane family of molecules includes, among others, the blockbuster anti-cancer drug, taxol. We then proceeded to express the first of many cytochrome P450 monooxygenases that oxidize the taxane scaffold in the third metabolic unit reaction. However, plant cytochrome P450s such as those involved in taxane biosynthesis are notoriously promiscuous and non-selective. A likely candidate that meets the synthetic requirements must first be selected, following which it must be customized to enhance its substrate specificity, product selectivity and activity. The use of structure-driven approaches is preferred herein as the structure-activity insights gained from redesigning one active site could potentially be extended to re-engineering downstream homologues. However, conventional methodologies such as X-ray crystallography are fairly lengthy and laborious. Ergo, we combined phylogeny-guided mutagenesis with a model-driven assessment of the active site of taxadiene-5ahydroxylase, the cytochrome P450 that catalyzes proto-oxidation of taxane scaffold, to investigate its catalytic mechanism. The reactive topography of the active site was then charted to relate the impact of structural features to activity and selectivity, opening up the future possibilities to specifically tune the reactivity of cytochrome P4 50s to catalyze the regio- and stereospecific oxidation of the taxane scaffold for prospection of targeted regions of natural product chemical space. Thesis advisor: Gregory N.Stephanopoulos W.H.Dow Professor of Chemical Engineering & Biotechnology To my parents, Gautam & Manali r Ci4 lr irtel 4-Flk WT :T M 10fr wu I I| a ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Isaac Newton remarked "If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants". I have been privileged to learn the art and science of research from the very best. Thank you, Professor Stephanopoulos. You have been a phenomenal guru, a fantastic mentor and a great well-wisher. To Professor Prather, my academic mother - your humour, energy, advice and support have been instrumental in the completion of this document. I still remember the day when I received my high school graduation certificate. It's funny how people develop selective amnesia when all of their friends have performed better than them on a test, the state examinations no less! I guess all those years of trying my level best to skip homework had finally taken their toll. All I remember is that sinking feeling when a school teacher who was a friend of the family quipped, "What happened? Your parents might not be too pleased" when I told him my final grades. Nonchalant until that precise moment, I was suddenly overcome with the fear of having deeply disappointed my parents. After all, in India, a son's state examination grades are as much a status symbol as the car one drives or the salary one draws. Mummy and Daddy - thank you for the advice you gave me at that moment when I was looking for the biggest hole in the ground to hide myself. You have been my best friends, my teachers, my role-models and my guides for all my life. Were it not for your love and support, I would not have made it this far. Daddy - thank you for being the best friend and confidante a lad could ask for. You have always been my beacon, guiding me through all waters. Your poise has been a source of strength. Your wit and humour have always dispelled the dark clouds away. You are my Charioteer. But I must confess - I have kept aside a bigger slice of the cake for Mummy. You and I both know why. Mummy - you are my Architect. You gave me the strongest of foundations in mathematics. You helped me with my science projects in school. You made learning history and geography stimulating. You kept me company at 3 am on practically every examination night. Even in university, you were my alarm clock, making sure I woke up on time for classes, examinations and theses defences. This degree belongs more to you than to me. Gautam - thank you for your camaraderie and love. Your counsel has been a source of great strength. Your mischief has been a source of great enjoyment and entertainment. You have always brought calm over me when I was beset by tempests. I thank Lord Ganapati for blessing me with the privilege of having you by my side. You are my General. Manali - thank you for your limitless love and patience. Your passion energizes me. Your support is my castle. Your serenity is infectious and has helped me sail through the turbulence. Like Mummy, you too sat by my side as I worked through the night to complete my thesis. I am truly blessed. But you do owe me some cake. You have robbed me of many 'bachelorship is bliss' jokes. Lastly, to all my too-many-to-list-by-name friends and well-wishers at MIT - thank you for the hours of fun and learning. You have made this journey a memorable one. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface 19 1 The Target-Rich, Lead-Poor Imbalance 1. 1. Drug discovery in the pre-Hatch-Waxman era 1. 2. Deficiencies in the old paradigm 1. 3. The industrialization of drug discovery 1. 4. New paradigm, same old problems 1. 5. The inadequacies of combinatorial chemistry 1. 6. Effect of the needle in a haystack paradigm on the industry's business model 23 23 24 24 27 28 29 2 Natural Products &the Pharmaceutical Industry 2. 1. The historical use of natural products as therapies 2. 2. What makes natural products good drugs? 2. 3. Why is industry interest in natural products declining? 2. 4. Alternatives for probing natural product space 31 31 32 34 37 3 Biosynthetic Engineering for Terpenoid Synthesis 3. 1. The terpenoid superfamily 3. 2. Modularity of terpenoid biosynthesis 3. 3. Metabolic & enzyme engineering for targeted & diversity-oriented biosynthesis 3. 4. Summary of recent progress 3. 5. Possible challenges moving forward 39 39 40 44 46 47 4 Mapping the Taxane Biosynthetic Pathway Using Cheminformatics 4. 1. Current understanding of the taxane pathway 4. 2. Description of the cartography methodology 4. 3. Constraints for ensuring accuracy of the cartographic methodology 4. 4. Computational assessment of the reactivity landscape of the early taxane pathway 4. 4. 1. Homology modeling 4. 4. 2. Substrate docking 4. 5. Results 4. 5. 1. Pathway map 4. 5. 2. The reactive landscape 4. 5. 2. 1. Comments about computational assessment of the P450 reaction mechanism 4. 5. 2. 2. Using the diffusion of oxygen into the active site as a constraint 4. 5. 2. 3. Method validation 4. 5. 2. 4. Results of the reactivity landscape investigations 51 52 54 58 59 59 61 62 62 63 63 67 68 70 4. 6. Implications of the computational investigations on metabolic engineering 71 5 Re-engineering Taxadien-5a-hydroxylase 5. 1. Background about P450 monooxygenases 5. 2. Materials & methods 5. 2. 1.Strains &plasmids 5. 2. 2. Culturing conditions 5. 2. 3. GC-MS analysis of hydroxylated taxanes 5. 2. 4. Protein engineering for optimal expression of taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase in E.coli 5. 2.5. Site-directed mutagenesis 5. 3. Results 5. 3. 1.Taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase is a promiscuous enzyme 5. 3. 2. Temporal profile of taxadiene proto-oxidation 5. 3. 3. The utility of traditional mutagenic practices to improve P450 reactivity 5. 3. 3. 1. Phylogeny-guided mutagenesis of taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase 5. 3. 3. 2. Mutations to taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase based on structural inferences 5. 3. 4. Computational assessment of the taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase catalytic cycle 5. 3. 5. Computational assessment of taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase mutants 5. 4. Conclusions & perspectives 5. 4. 1.Comparing the methodologies 5. 4. 2. The possibility of multiple substrates in a single active site 5. 4. 3. Directed evolution versus in silico modeling 5. 4. 4. Implications for metabolic engineering 94 98 99 99 100 102 102 6 Technoeconomic Analysis of Microbial Paclitaxel 6. 1. Background & assumptions 6. 2. Comparing the economics of the two competing approaches 6. 3. Summary of the economic assessment 6. 4. Providing unprecedented access to inaccessible chemical space 105 106 108 113 113 7 Putting It All Together: AVision for Drug Discovery 7. 1.What is biosynthonics? 7. 2. The informed design of superior pharmacophores 7. 3. Cheminformatics: An integral part of pharmacophore design 7. 4. Mining the natural world 7. 5. Continuous manufacturing as a tool for discovery 7. 6. Metabolic engineering The ultimate demonstration of continuous manufacturing 7. 7. Final words 117 118 119 122 124 125 Chapter References 75 76 77 77 78 79 79 80 81 81 83 87 87 90 126 128 129 Appendix A: List of taxanes analyzed for mapping the taxane biosynthetic pathway 141 Appendix B: Taxus cDNA library 177 Appendix C: Deduced taxane metabolic pathway 193 Appendix D: Sample PDB files for heme moiety of P450 HI & docking code 197 Appendix E: NMR raw data 207 a LIST OF FIGURES 1. 1. The target-rich, lead-poor imbalance 28 2. 1. The disparity between natural products and synthetic molecules 2. 2. Decline in the approval of natural product-based pharmaceuticals 34 35 3. 1. 3.2. 3. 3. 3. 4. Modularity of terpenoid biosynthesis Diversity-oriented biosynthesis Modularization and multivariate analysis The Jones-Firn Hypothesis 43 45 49 50 4.1. 4. 2. 4. 3. 4.4. 4. 5. 4. 6. 4. 7. 4. 8. 4. 9. Overview of the pattern-finding algorithm Summary of the taxane biosynthetic pathway The P450 catalytic cycle The 'snapshot' methodology Substrate docking Diffusion of oxygen as a constraint Method validation via assessing docking of Vitamin D3 into active site of CYP1 05Al Taxane biosynthetic reactivity landscape TOS of paclitaxel 57 62 65 66 67 68 69 71 73 5. 1. 5.2. 5. 3. 5.4. 5. 5. 5. 6. Map of plasmid expressing the P450 system Overview of the strain and enzyme engineering protocols used in the study Promiscuity & poor selectivity of taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase Characterized structures of some of the products Daily variation in eicosanoid production titers Assessment of the daily variation in the rate of change in the concentrations of the 16 eicosanoids Speculative reaction scheme Targets for phylogeny-guided mutagenesis Activity and selectivity comparisons between the mutant and parental P450 Differentiating the two types of selectivity improvements Grouping the selectivity improvements The lysine-aspartate dyad Influence of mutations to the dyad and amino acids at the periphery of the active site Improving reaction selectivity is a non-trivial challenge The oxygen rebound mechanism Overview of the competing proton abstractions from taxadiene 78 80 82 83 85 5. 7. 5. 8. 5. 9. 5.10. 5.11. 5. 12. 5. 13. 5. 14. 5.15. 5. 16. 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 5. 17. Hypothesized reaction mechanism 5. 18. Comparing mutation efficacy using the computational methodology 5.19. Ageneralized algorithm for in silico enzyme engineering 97 99 101 6. 1. Semi-synthesis of paclitaxel from plant-derived 10-deacetylbaccatin Ill (10-DAB) 6. 2. Total synthesis of taxadiene 6. 3. Biosynthesis of taxadiene 107 114 115 7. 1. 7.2. 7.3. 7.4. 120 121 123 127 Fragment-based pharmacophore discovery Overview of the biosynthonics paradigm Two scaffolds, one binding site Metabolic engineering, the ultimate demonstration of reaction intensification LIST OF TABLES 3. 1. Titers &yields for conversion of glycerol to taxadiene by the engineered E.coli strain 46 4. 1. Truncations & estimated pocket volumes of the 16 P450 monooxygenases investigated 64 6.1. Raw material costs for reaction scheme in Figure 6.1 6.2. Raw material costs for reaction scheme in Figure 4.9. 6. 3. Total manufacturing costs for plant-based and microbial-based manufacturing schemes 107 110 112 Preface A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE AMERICAN DRUG ENTERPRISE Every commentary that one reads about Big Pharma these days paints the same, grim picture1 . So bleak is the outlook in these reports that it seems implausible that innovator pharmaceutical companies were once amongst the most profitable and envied corporations in America2 . Even addressing the Pfizers and Mercks of this world as 'innovator' drug companies seems misplaced nowadays considering the extent to which they outsource drug discovery and clinical trials to contract research organizations (CROs)3 5 . Yet, such was the hegemony of these companies over the markets that, in the 1960s, a prominent senator even advocated passing reforms to curtail the drugmakers' burgeoning profits6' -. So how did Big Pharma land itself in this current predicament? Prior to the 1930s, the United States Food & Drug Administration (FDA) was nothing more than a titular regulatory agency whose powers extended to merely inspecting drugs for possible adulterations and seizing adulterated products7' 8. In fact, so lenient was regulation during this era that drugs could not only be marketed without testing their safety, but they could also be directly purchased by consumers without a prescription from a doctor or physician. This perilous situation 19 continued uninterrupted for many years, until finally in 1937, it all came to a head when several individuals succumbed to chemical poisoning after consuming a liquid formulation of sulphanilamide that had been prepared using diethylene glycol as the solvent. That diethylene glycol's toxic effects on humans were fully known and well understood at the time aptly sums up the FDA's alarming lack of regulatory oversight. Duly pressed, the government enacted the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) a year later, and, it then became mandatory for drugs to be tested for their safety by the FDA prior to market release. Other than this change, however, the provisions of the new act did not really expand the powers of the FDA. Clauses pertaining to the effectiveness of marketed drugs were still absent from the FFDCA, and, the FDA remained restricted to functioning as a passive regulatory body that could only object to the sale of unsafe drugs (as opposed to approving its release into the market). Moreover, the issue of consumers being able to purchase medication without a doctor's prescription also remained unaddressed. It wasn't until the passage of the Humphrey-Durham Amendment in 1951 that it finally became mandatory for drugs to be sold only by prescription. While some older drugs such as aspirin were exempted from its provisions, the Humphrey-Durham Amendment to the FFDCA successfully managed to stratify the drug demand-supply chain, thereby making it considerably easier for drug manufacturers to market their products. In this new drug market, pharmaceutical companies were only required to sell their products to consumers through 'agents' - the doctors, and, instead of 20 manipulating the preferences of the average consumer, drug manufacturers would only have to focus their marketing efforts on swaying the opinions of doctors. In due course, the practice of 'detailing' aggressively promoting a drug-maker's products to a doctor, mainly via personal visits to the clinic by the company's sales representatives - would take root 7 . The ballooning profits of the pharmaceutical companies in the decade that followed would once again catch the attention of the federal government. This time around, the influential senator from Tennessee, Estes Kefauver, was one among those who saw a profound flaw in the dichotomous structure of pharmaceutical sales and even advocated implementing reforms to curb the rapidly growing profits of drug companies. While this demand failed to materialize, the horrific thalidomide disaster that coincided with these debates eventually led to the passage of the Kefauver-Harris Amendment to the FFDCA that greatly expanded the role of the FDA to actively approving the release of a drug into the market only following validation of its safety and efficacy through extensive clinical testing. In a way, Senator Kefauver did get his wish - by mandating that a drug be extensively tested for safety and efficacy in lengthy clinical trials, the FDA was prolonging the time it took for the drug to enter the market, thus reducing its effective duration of patent protection and curtailing the drug-maker's profits6 . Patent protection and profit maximization would now become buzzwords in drug discovery, development and marketing. The very mention of patents is a veiled reference to the threat that innovator pharmaceutical companies constantly face from generic or copycat drug manufacturers - a threat that had now 21 escalated with the passage of the Kefauver-Harris Amendment. However, drugs manufactured by generic drug producers were still required to undergo extensive testing prior to marketing and this requirement often placed generic manufacturers - who tended to be much smaller than their innovative counterparts - at a significant disadvantage. Unsurprisingly, by the 1980s, riding the wave of their considerable competitive advantage, innovator drug producers continued to account for roughly 85% of the American drug market6 . Suspecting a lack of competitiveness in the pharmaceutical industry, the government would intervene yet again - this time, by passing the Hatch-Waxman Act in 1984. Formulated with the specific aim of remedying the competitive disparity in the drug markets, the Hatch-Waxman Act greatly simplified the regulatory requirements for the manufacture and marketing of off-patent drugs by generic manufacturers, and, by 1996 - now amidst fiercer competition than before - the share of innovator pharmaceutical companies in the American pharmaceutical market had eroded to 50%. To counter what had now become a clear and present danger from generic drug-makers, innovator pharmaceutical companies would adopt two paradigms that would eventually become the defining traits of the pharmaceutical industry as we know it today - direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising and the needle in a haystack model of drug discovery and development. While one strategy emphasized the 'industrialization' of drug discovery to reduce R&D timelines and lengthen the duration of market exclusivity granted by patent protection, the other would, in due course, earn innovator drug companies roughly $4.20 in sales for every dollar it invested in advertising7 . 22 Chapter 1 THE TARGET-RICH, LEAD-POOR IMBALANCE 1. 1. Drug discovery in the pre-Hatch-Waxman era Prior to implementation of the Hatch-Waxman Act, drug discovery was a team-based exercise and each team would usually focus on a specific therapeutic class. Biochemical or cell-based assays were generally unavailable at the time and 'lead molecules' were selected from a library of molecules synthesized by a team of chemists based on their ability to elicit desired effects in whole animal models9 . More often than not, lead molecules were natural products or their synthetic analogues. While team sizes would vary from project to project, each chemist in a team was expected to contribute between 50-150 molecules annually' 1. Each molecule in the library would be uniquely designed and synthesized individually in gram quantities and at high purities. Once a lead had been identified, 'lead optimization' followed suit. Herein, analogues would be synthesized in order to explore structure-activity relationships (SARs) to possibly modify the molecule in order to improve its pharmacological and drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic (DMPK) properties. Once a lead had been sufficiently improved, the drug discovery team would then prepare pre-formulations for preclinical testing. 23 1. 2. Deficiencies in the old paradigm The candidates that emerged from such a discovery pipeline, in general, fared quite well in clinical testing. The probability of clinical approval was sufficiently high, and, once a drug candidate gained clinical approval, it assured a company sizable revenues for several years. In fact, in most cases, these earnings comfortably exceeded the company's original R&D investments. Yet, despite these successes, many in the industry were concerned with what they viewed to be glaring deficiencies in this paradigm of drug discovery. Then, lead generation, identification and optimization were viewed as inseparable functions of the same drug discovery team, implying that drug discovery was sequential and slowl". Also, the 'black box'-like nature of the in vivo animal models meant that exclusive reliance on such models for evaluating DMPK properties such as absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) increased the risk of selecting a drug candidate that might work in the animal it was tested in, but not in humans'. Escalation in competition from generic drugmakers that followed the passage of the Hatch-Waxman Act merely accentuated these concerns. 1. 3. The industrialization of drug discovery At about the same time as the passage of the Hatch-Waxman Act, the use of biochemical and cellbased assays and computational tools in drug discovery was rapidly gaining popularity. In vitro assays greatly aided medicinal chemists to understand the molecular mechanisms of action of the drugs that they synthesized, and, as a result, allowed them to design superior drugs against molecularly well- 24 defined targets. A clear understanding of a drug's molecular mechanism of action was also beneficial from a regulatory perspective. Cognizant of these benefits, innovator drug companies responded by mandating in vitro and in silico assessments of the drug's pharmacological and DMPK properties prior to preclinical testing, and, soon, the use of biochemical and cell-based assays as well as in silico tools for drug discovery became pervasive across the industry0 . As part of the new paradigm, molecules that gave a positive result in an in vitro screening assay were referred to as 'primary hits', and if the activity of a primary hit and its degree of specificity for the target could be repeatedly confirmed, it was designated as a 'confirmed hit"0 . When the activity of a confirmed hit was corroborated in more elaborate assays such as organ bath assays, its selectivity towards a range of closely-related targets had been determined, and its chemical structure had been unambiguously proven by re-synthesis, it was then called a 'validated hit'. If the in vivo pharmacological properties and pharmacokinetic profile of the validated hit were deemed to be acceptable and it met a set of business criteria, the molecule would then become a lead compound, which, following numerous rounds of lead optimization, would later become a 'drug candidate'. In comparison, in the pre-Hatch-Waxman era, a lead compound rarely underwent standalone pharmacokinetic profiling since these characteristics were (presumably) satisfactorily addressed by the whole animal models9 . Despite their obvious benefits, exhaustively assessing potential leads in silico" and in vitro prior to in vivo pharmacology and DMPK studies significantly prolonged discovery timelines, diminishing 25 R&D productivity. Faced with ever-increasing competition from generic drug-makers, it soon dawned that the throughput of chemical synthesis had to rise in order to compensate for the increased testing molecules now underwent prior to in vivo testing. The scale and throughput of drug discovery had to rise by several orders of magnitude and this necessitated greatly accelerating lead generation and optimization by multiplexing and automating chemical synthesis and screening. Accordingly, the next wave of technological adoption across the industry duly focused on massively parallelizing chemical synthesis and screening via miniaturization of reaction systems and assays, all under robotic control. In keeping with this new vision, combinatorial chemistry soon became central to drug discovery'". Combinatorial chemistry generates molecular diversity by multiplicatively combining sets of precursors to yield a vast collection of discrete compounds which, depending on their functional groups, could be further reacted combinatorially to produce a larger library of molecules. This library can then be rapidly screened and pruned to yield smaller, more focused libraries whose members can then be selectively manipulated to improve their physicochemical and/or pharmacological properties"-". Information technology, too, became pervasive throughout the drug discovery pipeline - right from improving the quality of lead generation through use of virtual screens17 18, 'bar-coding' molecules" viz. storing data about a molecule's synthesis and its performance in an assay, to retrieving and utilizing information about a molecule in real-time. Aided by sterling developments in robotics and 26 21 20 instrumentation 9, the omics revolution , as well as new developments such as the lab-on-a-chip , 22 technology, the speed, quality and information density of assays also improved by leaps and bounds. 1. 4. New paradigm, same old problems For all the exponential improvements in workflow efficiency, the ensemble of available reactions in the synthetic chemistry toolbox remained unchanged. If anything, the number of reactions in the toolbox may have reduced on account of the kinetic incompatibility of several reactions with the timescales imposed by automation. Unsurprisingly, in the three decades following passage of the Hatch-Waxman Act, R&D expenditures by innovator drug companies have ballooned six-fold. Yet, new drug approvals by the FDA have remained relatively unchanged24 , and candidate attrition rates and development times have risen markedly during this period 2 25, 26. In fact, all of the 21,000- odd drug products that have ever been approved by the FDA act on no more than 324 unique molecular targets27 and, to make matters worse, this statistic has not changed appreciably following the transition to multiplexed, automated chemical synthesis and screening. Even if one were to generously assume that proteins sharing >35% identity exhibit related pharmacology, the entire pharmacopoeia is estimated to perturb only 1,048 genes - a mere 3.5% of the entire human genome or 130 unique functional protein domains from the more than 10,000 folds and 16,000 protein families. In fact, over 50% of all drugs target just 4 gene families, and, of the new molecular entities that were approved in the past three decades, only 6% targeted a previously undrugged protein domain (Figure 1.1). Drug discovery in its present multiplexed, automated form, it appears, is 27 highly redundant, and, the industry's declining prospects rest solely on the inability of innovator drug companies to discover leads that bind to novel protein domains - and not throughput, as was initially deduced. Undrugged 10(000 Drugged 130 Protein domains Inthe human body NME targets Inthe last 3 decades Figure 1.1. The target-rich, lead-poor imbalance: Of the roughly 10,000 unique protein domains in the human body, only as many as 130 (or 1.3%) have been successfully drugged over the course of the past century. Implementation of the multiplexed, automated paradigm for drug discovery, which is now in its fourth decade, did not alter the synthetic capabilities of the industry. Instead, it merely made the industry more efficient at what it had been doing for close to a century. As a consequence, while there is unanimity in which targets the industry should be pursuing to reverse its declining fortunes, the absence of revolutionary new synthetic techniques implies that only 6% of all NMEs approved during the last three decades targeted domains from the undrugged 98.7%. 1. 5. The inadequacies of combinatorial chemistry The high degree of drug redundancy in small-molecule drug discovery - which some experts have labeled as a 'target-rich, lead-poor' imbalance 28 - stems from the industry's use of combinatorial 28 chemistry for generating compound libraries. In the absence of innovation in chemical syntheses, the chemical space being screened for biological activity is usually one that has been previously interrogated29 and, as such, is unlikely to yield hits bearing steric and electronic features capable of binding novel protein domains. Even on the off chance that combinatorial chemistry outputs a lead that binds to a new target, it is highly probable that the candidate will exhibit clinically relevant polypharmacology30 . Furthermore, not only are leads generated by combinatorial chemistry promiscuous, but since the precursors used in their syntheses are predominantly aromatic, they bind to their intended targets quite weakly. Aromaticity introduces planarity into the molecules, which imparts them with rotational flexibility. This often has detrimental entropic consequences for strong and specific binding". That combinatorial chemistry yields only a single NME for every 100,000 molecules that are screened points to how stacked the odds are against it. 1. 6. Effect of the needle in a haystack paradigm on the industry's business model The low probability that a drug candidate had of gaining clinical approval, allied with the exorbitant costs3 2 associated with installing and maintaining the technological base required for automated, high-throughput lead generation, made it imperative for an approved drug to achieve exceptionally high sales in order to recoup its significant development costs33' 31. In fact, so enormous were these costs that only a third of all drugs approved in the first half of the 1990s were actually profitable. 29 As a consequence, innovator drug companies began targeting only those drugs that were capable of becoming therapeutic standards for chronic diseases that affected a large section of the population, or, in other terms, drugs that stood a good chance of possibly earning millions to even billions of dollars each year - the so-called 'blockbuster' drugs. The shift in companies' business models is best illustrated by the noticeable rise in market prevalence of blockbuster drugs during the past few years. In 1995, for example, only 17 drugs were blockbusters3 5 , whereas in 1999 and 2000, those figures rose to 35 and 44 respectively. The rise in market concentration of blockbuster drugs coincided with a similar surge in Big Pharma's profits, and, by 2001, despite constituting only 20% of the global marketplace, blockbuster drugs accounted for nearly 45% of total sales - or 70% of the industry's profits10 . The innovator companies' decision to pursue quantity over quality drastically altered their technical capabilities. Their chemistry know-how - the very knowledge that formed the basis of their existence and success - more or less stagnated. Perhaps what hurt the most was that the pursuit of quantity forced these companies to forego natural products - a rich source of therapeutic molecules that contributed roughly half of the 877 small-molecule NMEs approved by the FDA between 1981 and 2002. 30 Chapter 2 NATURAL PRODUCTS & THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY 2. 1.The historical use of natural products as therapies Natural products, particularly those from plants, have been used to treat human ailments since antiquity". In fact, the plant-based traditional medicine systems of India, China and Egypt date as far back as 4000 years3 7 . So economical and effective are these remedies that it comes as no surprise that plant-based medicine forms the bedrock of healthcare in much of the developing world37 . In developed nations too, plant products continue to be extensively used as food additives and nutritional supplements. This widespread popularity of plant products for their perceived medicinal properties ultimately prompted the scientific community to elucidate their pharmacological mechanisms and, in due course, several secondary metabolites exhibiting potent therapeutic properties would be characterized and isolated. The latter half of the 2 0 th century witnessed several additions to the collection of bioactive plant compounds, prominently vinblastine, an anti-cancer agent isolated from the Madagascar periwinkle, paclitaxel, an anti-cancer compound produced by the Pacific yew, and digitalis, a compound isolated 31 from the purple foxglove and used to treat heart conditions38 ; and several of these compounds would eventually become blockbuster molecules. These developments inevitably attracted the interest of several large pharmaceutical corporations and by the 1970s, bioprospecting - the process of screening, isolating and identifying bioactive secondary metabolites - became the dominant paradigm for drug discovery. 2. 2. What makes natural products good drugs? Most small molecule drugs elicit their therapeutic effect by selectively inhibiting or augmenting enzyme activity. In fact, the more selective the interaction, the more efficacious the drug is. It follows that 'drug-like' molecules are those that can selectively interact with specific biological targets, possess physical properties that facilitate transport by biological fluids across biological membranes, and achieve the right balance between retention time and binding equilibrium. As natural products play vital roles in reproduction, development, defence and symbiosis - especially in sessile plants 9 - the strength and selectivity of their interactions with their designated targets largely determines the evolutionary fate of their hosts. As a result, it is believed that the architecture and physicochemical and physiological properties of these molecules have been stringently selected by evolutionary pressures to bear diverse ring systems and chiral centres, exhibit a high degree of oxygenation, and contain a large number of solvated hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors40 , which, 32 in turn, allows these molecules to precisely localize, selectively bind and be efficiently transported within biological systems". The limitations of combinatorial chemistry, which yields a single NME for every 100,000 molecules that are screened, are in stark contrast to the fecundity of natural product chemical space". For instance, 20 or so of the 7,000-odd polyketides to have ever been screened for bioactivity have made it to the market, translating to an approval rate of 1 in 350. In fact, whereas Nature has provided the lion's share of the leads that bind to previously undrugged protein domains, de novo combinatorial chemistry has yielded just one drug in the past three decades that is linked with a novel target (Section 1. 4) The disparity44 between the drug-likeness4 5 of natural products and compounds generated via combinatorial chemistry (Figure 2.1), in turn, can be attributed to the ensemble of reactions that is used to generate the latter. A good number of chemical transformations such as enantioselective synthesis and oxidation, to name a couple, that are kinetically or technologically incompatible with the timescales imposed by high-throughput synthesis and screening have been largely done away with, severely curtailing access to some of the very structural features that are believed to make natural products more drug-like. Nevertheless, drug prospectors aren't migrating to the natural product space with any particular urgency (Figure 2.2). 33 Cobihm*irayNatural -5 i products - 3,287) .1ssos;-5(a Figure 2.1. The disparity between natural products and synthetic molecules: Plotting the two principal components derived from the orthogonal transformation of a set variables that include, among others, (1) molecular weight, (2) number of heavy atoms, (3) number of chiral centers, (4) number of rotatable bonds, (5) chain length, (6) degree of unsaturation, (7) number of rings, (8) ratio of aromatic atoms to ring atoms, (9) ratio of in-ring to out-of-ring heavy atoms, (10) number of ring systems, (11) ring fusion degree, (12) number of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur and 1 halogen atoms, (13) ratio of carbon atoms to all heavy atoms, (14) number of Lipinski-type acceptors" , (15) number of Lipinski-type donors, and (16) number of C-C, C-N and C-O bonds reveals the differences between the chemical space traversed by natural products and combinatorial chemistry (from Ref. 44). Typically, the products of combinatorial chemistry bear fewer chiral centers, rings, oxygenated substituents, and solvated hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors than natural products. 2. 3.Why isindustry interest innatural products declining? Bioprospecting poses several scientific and non-scientific challenges that make it unappealing for pharmaceutical companies in the current business climate. On account of the great strength and selectivity with which natural products bind to their designated targets, these molecules are almost never produced in copious quantities by their hosts. For example, six fully developed yew trees (Taxus spp.), which take about 200 years to grow, cumulatively produce no more than a single dose 34 of the blockbuster anticancer drug, paclitaxe 6 . Additionally, as natural products are generally synthesized via highly modular secondary metabolic pathways, most pharmacoactive natural products have several inactive analogues. Paclitaxel, for instance, is just one of hundreds of closelyrelated taxanes that are synthesized by the yew species. As a consequence, isolation and structural characterization of natural products continues to be encumbered, slow and not necessarily unambiguous. Natural product extracts aren't nearly as 'screen friendly' as synthetic compounds. Synthetic NMEs Natural Product NMEs NMEs derived from natural products M m M 25 Number 20 of NMEs approved 15 by the FDA 10 5 0 Total approved 1992 1995 1998 2001 2007 45 42 42 41 20 Figure 2.2. Decline in the approval of natural product-based pharmaceuticals: The total number of natural product and natural product-derived NMEs approved by the US FDA has been in steady decline since the late 1990s. The number of approvals in 2012 was not any greater than 2007 levels. However, if one excludes the number of repurposed NMEs, namely, molecules that were once approved for activity against a particular target but are now approved for activity against a newer target, the statistics are much worse. 47 On the manufacturing front, total synthesis of natural products, for all its exquisiteness , remains a cottage industry, and, synthetic routes for large-scale production of a majority of these molecules 35 either do not exist or are commercially infeasible. A synthon is defined as a structural unit, or building block, within a molecule that is the product of a specific synthetic unit operation", and, the combinatorial conjugation of synthons generates vast populations of diverse molecular structures, which are then screened to identify hits49' 1O.Despite their best efforts, synthetic chemists have been unable to effectively de-construct natural products into synthons, stymying natural product prospection as well as lead identification and optimization. In fact, since process development does not normally commence until the latter half of Phase II clinical trials", bioprospecting frequently yielded hits that had to be disregarded as late as the latter stages of Phase II clinical trials owing to insurmountable difficulties associated with their synthesis or procurement considerable amounts had already been spent on their development. all this after While commercial considerations and material sourcing difficulties accounted for only 5% of candidate attritions from clinical trials conducted in 1991, this number had risen to 28% in 2001 52. Process development continues to remain a major stumbling block in the manufacture of natural products and only those products that were extractable in generous quantities from relatively easy-to-culture organisms have ever realized commercialization. The supply of source material from which natural products are extracted is also often unreliable and prone to seasonal and environmental variations. In fact, it is not uncommon for promising leads to be forsaken since their native hosts are critically endangered or large-scale production of the drug could be detrimental to the biodiversity of the host's natural habitat. Take the case of medicinal 36 plants, a source that has yielded about a fifth of all clinically approved natural products". According to one estimate54 , roughly a quarter of medicinal plant species now face the threat of extinction. 2. 4. Alternatives for probing natural product space Recent applications of genetic approaches to decipher the biosynthetic code that guides the assembly of polyketides have revealed that living systems methodically and repetitively combine building blocks produced by a handful of enzyme-catalyzed unit reactions to generate unprecedented molecular diversity. On the back of these developments, and aided by sterling advances in microbial genetics and industrial biotechnology, the recent explosion in the volume of gene and protein data, the development of more precise techniques for studying cellular metabolism and genetic regulation and the exponentially declining costs of genome sequencing and oligonucleotide synthesis, microbial metabolic engineering is poised to become the fulcrum of new technologies for probing natural product space. Already, significant strides in developing novel microbial strains for the production of artemisinic acid, a precursor to the antimalarial drug, artemisinin55 ; the nutraceutical, lycopene56 ; the production of several antibiotics 57 ; levopimaradiene, a gateway precursor to the ginkgolide family of pharmaceuticals and health supplements58; and taxadiene, the first dedicated metabolite in the biosynthesis of taxol, a blockbuster anticancer drug59 . In principle, all that is required is to transplant the genes of the biosynthetic pathway yielding the target product into the host, eliminate unnecessary or physiologically less significant native reactions, and lastly, re-tool the cellular regulatory networks via rational or random approaches to ensure optimal production6 0 . This strategy 37 offers numerous advantages over de novo chemical synthesis and plant cell cultures in the production of plant secondary metabolites as it is readily scalable, consumes lower quantities of resources, is benign to the environment and uses inexpensive sugar-based carbon inputs38 . A synergism of bioprocess optimization and metabolic engineering promises high titre production of these therapeutic molecules and offers a commercially viable alternative to the production of bioactive plant-derived chemicals. 38 Chapter 3 BIOSYNTHETIC ENGINEERING FOR TERPENOID SYNTHESIS 3. 1. The terpenoid superfamily Natural products are estimated to total about 170,000 molecules, of which, a vast majority are plant secondary metabolites 61, and, hard as it is to believe, this immense chemical diversity is the product of just 3 metabolic pathways. Nearly 60% of all natural products are believed to synthesized by the terpenoid (or isoprenoid) pathway, 30% are contributed by the related polyphenol, phenylpropanoid and polyketide pathways, and about 10% originate from the alkaloid pathway. Terpenoids are interesting from several perspectives - not only are they the most abundant and ancient natural product family, but several terpenoids have been characterized as anti-cancer, antimicrobial, anti-allergenic, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory drugs6 1, 62. Some such as menthol, a counterirritant harvested in large quantities from the peppermint herb, Mentha piperita; artemisinin, an anti-malarial compound produced by the plant, Artemisia annua; abietic acid, an acidic resin extracted from conifers and used as a feedstock; and paclitaxel, a blockbuster anti-cancer drug isolated from the bark of the Pacific yew, Taxus brevifolia6 2- 64 have already been commercialized by pharmaceutical companies. 39 3. 2. Modularity of terpenoid biosynthesis Despite being a potential treasure chest of blockbuster molecules, interest from metabolic engineers in terpenoid biosynthesis, especially for pharmaceutical production, has been modest in comparison to the polyketide family, a substantially smaller class of molecules. This is explained, in part, by the fact that a great number of bioactive polyketides are products of multimodular megasynthases called type I polyketide synthases (PKSs), which made their study and manipulation less encumbered than the distributed terpenoid pathways. However, as our understanding of terpenoid biosynthesis has greatly matured over the past two decades, it is now apparent that re-engineering terpenoid pathways to meet a discovery program's synthetic requirements is arguably easier than modulating multienzyme PKSs that shuttle metabolic intermediates from one active site to the other. In addition to modifying the reaction mechanism and substrate specificity of the pathway enzymes, PKS re-engineering also incurs the additional task of altering the interactions between its constituent modules as minor perturbations to the contact interfaces of the domains could detrimentally lower the activity of the entire enzyme complex. The enzymes that participate in terpenoid assembly, in contrast, act individually. Terpenoid construction (Figure 3.1) commences with the head-to-tail condensation reaction between two C5 molecules, isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl pyrophosphate 40 (DMAPP). The latter is the smallest member of a homologous series of metabolites known as the allylic pyrophosphates. The pyrophosphate moiety of the allylic pyrophosphates is a strong leaving group and the transition state n-conjugated carbocation is very stable. This makes allylic pyrophosphates strong alkylating agents". IPP combines with DMAPP to generate a 10-carbon allylic pyrophosphate, which itself then alkylates IPP in situ to produce a 15-carbon species. Successive repetitions of the same head-to-tail condensation in the same active site generate longer allylic pyrophosphates in Cs increments. The number of repetitions is pre-programmed and enzymespecific 66 . Incidentally, IPP is synthesized by either the mevalonate or non-mevalonate pathways. The latter commences with the condensation of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate with pyruvate to yield 2-methyl-(D)-erythritol-4-phosphate (MEP). In contrast, the mevalonate pathway commences with the co-condensation of acetyl-CoA to produce acetoacetyl-CoA 67 . The non-mevalonate pathway, with a few exceptions, is specific to prokaryotes and utilizes carbon and energy sources more efficiently than the eukaryotic-based mevalonate pathway 68. The head-to-tail condensation that elongates the terpenoid chain is re-implemented in the second stage in a different configuration to convert the linear allylic pyrophosphate to a dephosphorylated, polycyclic molecule. Cyclization proceeds via an intra-chain Markovnikov addition reaction between any one of the several alkenyl units in the polymer chain and the allylic carbocation that is formed at the tail end of the molecule following the departure of the pyrophosphate group66, 69. Since the alkenyl units are quite close to one another, repeating at 5-carbon intervals within the chain, 41 addition to any one alkene initiates a cascade of proton abstractions and bond migrations that culminates in the formation of a predominantly saturated polycycle. The catalogue of terpenoid structures synthesized by an organism can be expanded by evolving enzymes that favor coupling between two allylic pyrophosphates over electrophilic alkylation of IPP, thereby yielding branched chains 66 70. Varying the number of elongation events that occur during the first stage or altering the configuration of the electrophilic attack during the second stage also adds to terpenoid diversity7 1 . Crucially - and, perhaps unique to terpenoid biosynthesis - addition of the allylic carbocation to the carbon-carbon double bond in IPP can be cis/trans. While organisms generally evolve enzymes that selectively form one geometric isomer over the other, combinatorial biocatalysis offers the potential to literally exponentiate the number of synthesizable structures by introducing geometric isomerism each time the enzymatic reaction occurs70 . In the third stage, the polycycle is oxidized by a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase. The P450s constitute a large family of highly conserved, heme-thiolate enzymes that are present in all forms of life72 . They usually act in concert with a flavoprotein redox partner - a cytochrome P450 reductase that shuttles electrons and protons derived from NADPH to the oxygenase's active site, whereat molecular oxygen is protonated and heterolytically cleaved to form water and a reactive iron-oxygen species that then inserts the second oxygen atom into the substrate73 . Oxidation of the hydrocarbon scaffold activates it for further functionalization in the fourth stage of terpenoid synthesis. 42 Chain elongation via head-to-tall condensations: +OPP OPP IPP 1 - OPP GPP DMAPP P Opp OPP FPP General formula for head-to-tall condensation: 'Op p -n OPP+ 'PP -n - Scaffold formation via intra-chain condensation: OPP Taxadiene GGPP Scaffold activation by oxidation: + 02 + NADPH - I-OH? >it + NADP* Taxadien-5a-ol Core diversification: Jt I.OH + + S CoA-SH Taxadien-5a-ethanoate Figure 3.1. Modularity of terpenoid biosynthesis: De novo total synthesis of the C20 taxane scaffold involves in excess of 20 steps. It biosynthetic assembly and structural core diversification, in comparison, is considerably more straightforward. The nucleophilic oxygen atom of the hydroxyl group is either directly attacked by strong electrophiles or forms a more nucleophilic alkoxide species that then attacks weaker electrophiles. Acylations are the most commonly observed products during this stage of terpenoid assembly. The hydroxylated scaffolds can also undergo hydroxyl hydrogen substitution reactions such as 43 esterifications, oxidations, halogenations, hydrosulphonations, glycosylations and even protein conjugations in vitro. Being oxidized, such scaffolds also allow the ready addition and replacement of bioisosteres for faster and more direct lead optimization. 3. 3. Metabolic & enzyme engineering for targeted & diversity-oriented biosynthesis Ordered combinations of known genes into biosynthetic operons to be expressed as heterologous metabolic pathways in tractable microbial hosts - a strategy that is referred to as biosynthetic engineering - generates pharmacophores that are natural products in toto, whereas permutations and mutations produce molecules that possess a scaffold that is an unnatural isomer of a natural product. Conversely, clustering combinations, permutations and mutations of the biosynthetic genes could generate libraries of natural product-like molecules (Figure 3.2). Once a combination of enzymatic reactions that can or could produce the molecule of interest has been identified, individual active sites must then be re-engineered in order to enhance substrate specificity, product selectivity and activity. This is especially true for targeted synthesis using enzymes from secondary metabolic pathways that are known to be promiscuous and poorly selective 74 . The mutagenized enzymes must then be combined into a pathway and enzyme expression must be suitably toggled in order to adjust their concentrations. Discriminatory expression equalizes enzyme turnovers and elevates flux through the pathway. 44 Cyclization Tailoring C e.g. Esleification Sub-type Sub-type A Polynerization Sub-type 8B3 Metagenomics will add to our repository of natural product biosynthetic pathways Oxidation Sub-type A Cataloguing the reactive proclivities of the enzymes, including the sub-types of the reactions they catalyze Generating molecular diversity using combinatorial biocatalysis and chemistry ~, ~ -us~Al ~K~ Using a microbial chassis for expressing the enzyme combinations, permutations and mutations High-throughPut screeningdicvr Anti-inHective Figure 3.2. Diversity-oriented biosynthesis: Akin to the concept of 'combinatorial biosynthesis' that had been espoused by advocates of polyketide-based pharmaceuticals, controlled expression of combinations, permutations and mutations of terpenoid biosynthetic genes, when perfected, can potentially generate focused libraries of natural productlike molecules. The engineered pathway must later be integrated into a retrofitted microbial metabolic network. Interventions to microbial metabolism can occur at one or many of the following levels: (1) enhancing the rate of substrate uptake, (2) reducing the flux to competing native pathways, (3) enhancing the flux of precursors and cofactors to the engineered pathway, (4) exporting the product to the extracellular medium in order to shift equilibrium towards product formation. The choice of 45 the microbial host is guided by its propensity for growth, carbohydrate substrate preference, potential toxicity of products and by-products, permissible metabolic load, and adherence to desirable bioprocessing requirements. 3. 4. Summary of recent progress Our research group recently demonstrated the feasibility of biosynthetic engineering to successfully synthesize taxadiene, the first intermediate in the paclitaxel biosynthetic pathway that bears the unique taxane scaffold, using glycerol as the primary carbon feedstock at unprecedented titers of 0.30 and 1.00 g/L in 2 mL fed-batch and 1 L batch fermentations5 9 . For the 1 L fermentations, the optical density of the E. coli cultures reached a peak of ~40 after 5 days. Assuming an equivalency between an optical density of 1.0 and a dry biomass titer of 0.3 g/L, the overall yield of taxadiene on a dry cell weight basis is estimated to be 0.0925 g/g. Table 3.1. Titers & yields for conversion of glycerol to taxadiene by the engineered E. coli strain Actual yield as a % of theoretical glycerol) (g/g Yield (g/L) titer Highest taxadiene Scale & configuration maximum yield 2 mL fed-batch 0.30 0.02 5.88 1 L batch 1.00 0.03 8.82 46 This work marks an important conceptual advance as 2 of the 4 biosynthetic modules of terpenoid synthesis - namely, chain elongation and cyclization - appear to function quite robustly in a simple and easily manipulable host such as E coli. 3. 5. Possible challenges moving forward The next logical goal is demonstration of microbial-based stereo- and regiospecific scaffold oxidation for the production of activated molecules for structural core diversification, either by enzymatic or chemical approaches, to corroborate the claims of biosynthetic engineering for drug discovery. To this end, we have targeted the oxidation of taxadiene, which is presumed to first undergo hydroxylation at the 5a-position. Unfortunately, the exact sequence of substitutions following 5ahydroxylation of the taxane scaffold is unknown and deciphering the precise order of the biotransformations has been the subject of intense research over the past two decades. Yet, despite their best efforts, researchers have simply been unable to map the taxane metabolic pathway. In fact, a large majority of the biosynthetic pathways that produce potentially valuable terpenoids are uncharacterized. Moreover, even if a pathway has been completely catalogued, its regulatory mechanisms are often poorly understood 75 . This implies that construction and optimization of expression of the pathway, especially balancing the catabolic, primary metabolic and secondary metabolic fluxes to ensure 47 equitable distribution of resources between growth, maintenance and product formation 76 are fairly long-drawn. For instance, strain engineering and optimization for the production of taxadiene at the yield and productivity stated earlier (which, as shall be demonstrated in Chapter 6, ensure costcompetitiveness of taxol production using microbial metabolic engineering) consumed an equivalent number of cloning hours as work conducted to demonstrate production of amorphadiene, another unsubstituted terpenoid scaffold, in E. coli. Here, the methodology of assessing and eliminating regulatory and pathway bottlenecks by re-defining the metabolic network as a collection of distinct modules whose constitution and overall concentrations can be efficiently adjusted using a variety of transcriptional, post-transcriptional and translational mechanisms could maximize pathway turnover with respect to resource expenditure. The practice of re-casting metabolic networks as a collection of interacting modules makes the analysis of a very complicated system considerably more tractable and allows easy assessment of the performance of module configurations using multivariate statistics (Figure 3.3). Additionally, as evidenced from the gibberellin biosynthetic pathway 77, being components of the adaptive immune system in plants78-80, secondary metabolic pathways comprise several promiscuous and non-selective enzymes that maximize the chemical diversity produced within the pathway, which, in turn, allows the plant to respond to a greater number of environmental stimuli without expending additional energy or increasing the information content of its genome (Figure 3.4). Although useful from the perspective of diversity-oriented synthesis, this hypothesis - called the 48 I, "-'I i IVII Jones-Firn Selection Hypothesis - presents some interesting challenges for the targeted production of molecules using metabolic engineering. ioer EWIM - Ad1 Strength of RIBS I Source of enzpmPromoter strength Figure 3.3. Modularization and multivariate analysis: The flux through a linear pathway is the reaction rate of the pathway's slowest step. This implies that, at steady state, the observed turnovers of several enzymes of the pathway are below their maximum values. By grouping enzymes with similar turnovers into a subset, or module, and later equalizing the turnovers of the different subsets by adjusting variables such as module constitution, promoter strength, plasmid copy numbers, RBS strength, among others, one can assess pathway turnover using multivariate statistical operations such as principal component analysis. This approach has already found extensive use in analysis of molecular events in signal transduction pathways"1. Once a likely combination of enzymatic reactions that could produce the molecule of interest has been identified, they will necessitate customization or active site re-engineering to enhance substrate 49 specificity, product selectivity and activity to minimize flux dissipation away from the molecule of interest. Consequently, enzyme engineering becomes another critical endeavor in the goal to produce specific natural products in microbial hosts. Central metabolism IPP I DMAPP - A Figure 3.4. The Jones-Firn Hypothesis: According to Clive Jones and Richard Firn, if every secondary metabolite can be thought of as being a unique response to an environmental stimulus, it can be argued that the enzymes of secondary metabolic pathways may have evolved to become promiscuous. Substrate promiscuity or poor product selectivity maximises the structural and functional diversity of secondary metabolites produced by the host, which, in turn, allows it to respond to a greater diversity of environmental stimuli, thereby improving its evolutionary fitness. In the two hypothetical scenarios depicted here, the plant in B can respond to the same number of environmental stimuli by incurring a roughly 30% lower metabolic load compared to the plant in A. 50 Chapter 4 MAPPING THE TAXANE BIOSYNTHETIC PATHWAY USING CHEMINFORMATICS Paclitaxel is manufactured via a semi-synthetic process that commences with extraction of its precursor, 10-deacetylbaccatin III (10-DAB), from plant cell cultures of Taxus spp. As metabolomics investigations have revealed that paclitaxel is one of several hundred closely related taxanes produced by the Taxus cell cultures, a significant proportion of the bulk price of paclitaxel, which, in 2012 was estimated to be roughly $190,000 per kg, is attributed to separation costss2 Development of a microbial-route that can produce 10-DAB, paclitaxel or another precursor at high titers and very few by-products could drastically lower the price of the drug, thereby increasing access to more patients. However, as discussed in Section 3.5, the paucity of information regarding taxane and several other terpenoid biosynthetic pathways has greatly restricted access to these valuable molecules through microbial metabolic engineering. For the case of the taxane pathway, all that is known is that it commences with the cyclization of the linear molecule, geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP) to produce taxadiene8 3. It has been presumed that taxadiene is then substituted at the 5a-position with 51 a hydroxyl group. The exact sequence of substitutions following 5ct-hydroxylation of the taxane scaffold is unknown and deciphering the precise order of the biotransformations has been the subject of intense research over the past two decades. Yet, despite their best efforts, researchers have simply been unable to map the taxane metabolic pathway. Demonstrating the successful expression of the third chemical module in terpenoid biosynthesis namely, scaffold oxidation - in E. coli necessitates metabolic cartography to determine the identities of the genes for their eventual expression in the microbe. To this end, we developed a generalizable methodology to map the biosynthetic pathway by analyzing chemical substitution patterns in naturally occurring taxane metabolites as well as investigating taxane biochemistry via molecular modeling and docking studies. Identifying the sequential order of metabolic reactions in the taxane biosynthetic allows one to study the biochemistry of the pathway by correctly pairing enzymes with their substrates, providing valuable insights for protein engineering to improve enzyme activity and selectivity. This new intellectual framework for elucidating biosynthetic routes and the biochemical mechanisms of their constituent reactions could open up opportunities for investigating several more terpenoid pathways. 4. 1. Current understanding of the taxane pathway While the exact sequence of reactions in the pathway has been hitherto elusive, significant progress has nonetheless been made in the study of taxane metabolism. Among these, metabolomics 52 investigations on T. cuspidata cell cultures have been able to successfully isolate and characterize 128 taxane metabolites (Appendix A), and several putative taxane biosynthetic genes have also been sequenced (Appendix B) 83-86 . However, the absence of a blueprint or map of taxane metabolism has prevented the identification of metabolite-enzyme pairs, which in turn has hampered efforts to study the pathway's biochemical and regulatory mechanisms in greater detail. Graph theory and atom mapping have been previously utilized to discover novel or non-standard metabolic pathways 87, 88. Herein, genome-scale models and information about atom conservation within known pathways are utilized to design novel metabolic pathways for the production of desired molecules from defined precursors can be designed and tested. Our situation is a direct contrast to these methodologies. Additionally, since secondary metabolic pathways proceed using a structural core formation-diversification synthesis plan, atom mapping is unlikely to shed any light on pathway topology. Some recent studies have attempted to decipher the sequence of reactions in the taxane biosynthetic pathway by systematically evaluating the reactivity of individual enzymes towards different substrates in vitro83'89. For example, if an enzyme that is presented with taxadiene-5a-ol, taxadiene-1Op-ol and taxadiene-5ct, 10jp-diol as substrates yields taxadiene- 1 0p,2a-diol as the major product, it is annotated as taxadiene-1Op-ol 2a-hydroxylase. The non-reacting or partially reacting substrates are then presented to another enzyme to determine its identity and this evaluation continues until all enzymesubstrate pairs have been identified. 53 All that is known about the taxane metabolic scheme thus far, including annotations of genes of the pathway, has been achieved using the aforementioned methodology. However, such a method for pairing enzymes to their corresponding substrates suffers from a glaring shortcoming that assumes that taxol is the major end-product of a linear pathway. This might not be the case. As suggested by the Jones-Firn Screening Hypothesis (Section 3.5), enzymes of the taxane pathway may very well be promiscuous and non-selective, implying that the pathway could be highly branched. 4. 2. Description of the cartography methodology The methodology utilizes the chemical structures of intermediates and products, and the putative sequences of the pathway's genes (which is used to derive homology models of the pathway's enzymes) as inputs and then outputs the map or sequence of reactions in the metabolic pathway. The analysis is unique in its integration of data across three strata of the metabolic hierarchy, namely metabolites, genes, and proteins and makes novel use of tools and techniques that are otherwise commonly applied to the study of chemical or biological problems9". Moreover, the algorithmic architecture of the analytical procedure ensures that it is easily programmable for use as a software package for the analysis of poorly characterized metabolic pathways. The analysis commences by cataloguing the chemical structures of as many naturally-derived taxanes and then recasting this pictorial information into a mathematically interpretable format. Examples of 54 mathematically interpretable formats include the SMILES' (simplified molecular input line entry specification) nomenclature that is frequently used to catalogue molecules in chemical databases, or the more generic, binary vector representation wherein the length, column numbers and elements of the vector represent the total number of carbon atoms in the molecule, their assigned IUPAC designations, and the type of substitution they bear, respectively. It is, however, essential that a single format be used for all the molecules to preserve consistency and allow easy analysis of metabolite structural data. Also, using mathematically interpretable formats makes programming the analysis into a software package more amenable. Structure cataloguing revealed that all naturally-derived taxanes bear a subset of the following substitutions: p-substituted with either a hydroxyl group or an ester group. i. Carbon 1 is exclusively ii. Carbon 2 is exclusively a-substituted with either a hydroxyl group or an ester group. iii. Carbon 3, which is a tertiary carbon, is never substituted. Substitution at this position is sterically hindered. iv. A double bond is mostly observed between carbons 4 and 20. In some cases, carbon 4 is part of a 4-member ring known as the oxetane ring wherein it is directly bonded to carbon 20 and carbon 5, which, in turn, are connected to each other via an ether bond. Carbon 4 is also a-substituted with an ester group when it is part of the oxetane ring. In rare cases, carbon 4 55 and 20 form an epoxide ring, while in even rarer cases, carbon 20 is hydroxylated by hydration of the carbon 4-carbon 20 double bond. v. Carbon 5 is generally a-substituted with either a hydroxyl group or an ester group. In some cases, it is also a part of the oxetane ring. vi. Carbons 6 and 8 are never substituted. vii. Carbon 7 is exclusively viii. Carbon 9 is exclusively a-substituted with either a hydroxyl group or an ester group. Carbon P-substituted with either a hydroxyl group or an ester group. 9 is also ketonated in many taxanes. p-substituted with either a hydroxyl group ix. Carbon 10 is exclusively x. Carbons 11 and 12 are never substituted and are connected to each other by a double bond. xi. Carbon 13 is exclusively a-substituted with either a hydroxyl group or an ester group. or an ester group. Carbon 13 is also ketonated in many taxanes. xii. Carbon 14 is exclusively n-substituted with either a hydroxyl group or an ester group. 56 xiii. Carbon 15 is very rarely connected to carbon 13 via an ether bond. Otherwise, it is unsubstituted. xiv. Carbons 16, 17, 18 and 19 are never substituted. Next, a Bayesian probability-based algorithm is used to infer relationships between the taxane metabolites. The conceptual foundations of this approach, called 'substitution pattern-finding', are similar to those of applying Bayesian probability to establish phylogenetic relationships between organisms in evolutionary biology (Figure 4.1)9'. R R R R R n= Number of metabolites with / R R R R R R hydroxylation at 5a position OH R OH R R R n2 Number of metabolites with hydroxylation at 70 position n Number of metabolites with hydroxylations at both, 5a and 70 positions R RR R R If n, > n2 and n2 = n, hydroxylation at 5a precedes that at 7P position Figure 4.1. Overview of the pattern-finding algorithm 57 4. 3. Constraints for ensuring accuracy of the cartographic methodology Consider a hypothetical sequence of reactions that commences with the conversion of taxadiene to taxadiene-5a-ol. Taxadiene-5ct-ol is then converted to taxadiene- Taxadiene-5a, 10p-diol, which then produces taxadiene-5a-acetate-10p-ol following esterification of the 5a-hydroxyl group. If one was only provided with the chemical structures of these metabolites without any information regarding the sequence of the reactions that connect them, evaluating the substitution patterns of the metabolites can yield the putative sequence of reactions. However, merely relying on substitution occurrence frequencies could lead to confounding conclusions. Accordingly, chemical feasibility constraints have to be imposed on the pattern finding exercise for deducing meaningful and nonconfounding relationships between the taxane metabolites. These constraints include inviolable rules in organic chemistry as well as information about putative reaction mechanisms. One example of an inviolable rule in organic chemistry is the impossible occurrence of ester formation prior to hydroxylation. Also, understanding the mechanism of a reaction can provide insights into aspects such as transient species stabilization via steric or electronic modifications in the molecule. Amongst the metabolites listed above, it is evident that taxadiene is the least substituted molecule and hence must precede all the other species in the hypothetical pathway. Similarly, since the 5aacetylation must succeed the 5c-hydroxylation, it can be concluded that taxadiene-5a-acetate-10p-ol can be produced by one of three possible routes: (1) taxadiene-5ax-ol to taxadiene-5c-acetate to taxadiene-5a-acetate-10p-ol, (2) taxadiene-5a-ol to taxadiene-5at,10p-diol to taxadiene-5a-acetate58 1OP-ol, or (3) taxadiene-10p-ol to taxadiene-5a,10P-diol to taxadiene-5a-acetate-10p-ol. However, the separate occurrence of taxadiene-5a-ol and taxadiene-5c,10p-diol suggests that the likeliest pathway from taxadiene to taxadiene-5a-acetate- 10fp-ol is via path 2. The map of taxane metabolism as outputted by the constraints-based substitution pattern finding is then validated in the second stage of the theoretical framework - computational enzyme catalysis. Herein, bioinformatics and computational chemistry are utilized to study enzyme catalysis. To eliminate bias, we ignore enzyme annotations as they appear in GenBank. 4. 4. Computational assessment of the reactivity landscape of the early taxane pathway 4. 4. 1. Homology modeling Since crystallographic structures of none of the taxane biosynthetic enzymes have been hitherto characterized, homology or comparative modeling has to be utilized in order to obtain precise representations of the enzymes and their active sites. Briefly, homology modeling of an enzyme, or target, commences with template selection, and a wide variety of open-source fold-recognition or threading software can be utilized for this purpose". These programs score and rank templates based on the similarity of their structural folds to those predicted for the target enzyme. While the topranked templates as suggested by the fold-recognition or threading programs generally produce fairly accurate homology models, it is recommended that they be manually checked for similarity with the 59 target enzyme by comparing predictions for physicochemical parameters such as their secondary structures, solvent accessibility, membrane-binding domains, ordered-disordered regions as well as phenomena such as distance bonding. In the rare event that a suitable template is unavailable, one has to resort to de novo enzyme modeling. Fortunately, the likelihood of such a scenario arising for enzymes of plant secondary metabolic pathways is quite slim. After suitable templates have been selected, their sequences are carefully aligned with that of the target using the compatibility between the aforementioned physicochemical parameters as a constraint. Open-source software is also available for this purpose". Incidentally, most foldrecognition software also produce alignments between the top-ranked templates and the targets, but these are quite crude and have to be substantially refined if they are to be used for model building. The target-template alignment is then utilized to build homology models. Many software packages, each differing in their optimization criteria, are freely available for this task, and the quality of models that they output is fairly comparable for most families of proteins. Once the homology models have been built, they are checked for structural correctness using gauges such as a Ramchandran plot and further, if necessary. The Taxus cDNA library from which the sequences were derived contains 16 P450 and 10 acyltransferase (9 acetyl- and 1 benzoyltransferase) sequences"3 ' 84, 86, 95. Homology models of the taxane biosynthetic enzymes were constructed using MODELLER96 . Target sequences that exceeded 60 their templates in length were suitably truncated in order to ensure that the homology modeling program is able to capture the folds of the templates. As the cytochrome P450 monooxygenases contain heme prosthetic groups, their active sites were first located using the pocket searching algorithm, POCASSA97 , following which the heme groups were manually docked and their geometries optimized using the BFGS energy minimization algorithm. The structural database, DALI 98, was also searched for crystallographically solved homologues to validate the output of the pocket searching algorithm. 4. 4. 2. Substrate docking Next, computational models of an enzyme's putative substrate and product, as suggested by the consensus map, as well as a broad selection of other taxane molecules were docked into the active site of the enzyme model using an open-source software package, AUTODOCK, to predict the preferred orientation of the ligand as well as its binding affinity (or energy of interaction) with the active site. It was hypothesized that docking a large collection of molecules into the active site of the enzyme could potentially offer several insights into its promiscuity towards substrates. The docking exercise is repeated for all enzymes, and upon its completion, one can finally compare the energies of interaction for several enzyme-metabolite pairs, thereby confirming or rejecting those suggested by the consensus map. 61 4. 5. Results 4. 5. 1. Pathway map Extending the pair-wise comparisons to encompass all substituted positions produced a putative map of taxane metabolism, whose early stages almost exclusively comprise of P450-mediated oxidations (pathway summary in Figure 4.2, entire pathway is been presented in Appendix C). 32.5% 24.5% Sa-OH - 1O0-OH -- 9u-OH - 13a-OH - 2a-OH Variation in the order between 9a, 13o and 2a is probable 13-oxo 9-oxo - - Paclitaxel % 9a-acetate 18.8% 13G-aCetate 5.4% 7p-OH Figure 4.2. Summary of the taxane biosynthetic pathway: Interestingly, studies on the production of paclitaxel by plant cell cultures of T cuspidatahave revealed that paclitaxel, on a weight basis, accounts for about a fifth of all taxanes produced. Accounting for variations in molecular weights, the map outputted by the substitution pattern finding exercise appears to mirror actual production of paclitaxel. While substitutions at most carbon atoms on the taxane scaffold can be definitively ordered, the temporal relation between some functionalizations such as hydroxylations at the 2a, 9a and 13a positions cannot be deduced. Also, substitution patterns suggest that oxetane ring formation is among the last modifications to occur on the scaffold. 62 The suggestion that the early pathway almost exclusively consists of P450-mediated reactions is not all that surprising as this biosynthetic strategy has also been observed in other natural product biosynthetic pathways. As P450 monooxygenases catalyze C-H bond functionalization instead of acylation of an O-H bond that is mediated by acyltransferases, the former are more prone to promiscuity and non-selectivity, increasing chemical diversity within the pathway. Single amino acid mutations within the active site of P450 monooxygenases could make these reaction sites 'plastic', which, according to the Jones-Firn Selection Hypothesis, is a more robust and reliable way to generate diversity compared to the significant alterations that might be required to re-orient a polyoxidized molecule in order to drive acylation at one hydroxyl group over another. Accordingly, the reactive landscape was subsequently investigated by assuming that the hydroxylations at the 5aand 10p-positions precede the others and assuming all possible permutations of the 2a-, 9a- and 13a-hydroxylations. 4. 5. 2. The reactive landscape 4. 5. 2. 1. Comments about computational assessment of the P450 reaction mechanism Homology models of all 16 P450 monooxygenases in the Taxus cDNA library were constructed using MODELLER. The enzymes were randomly annotated as HI through H16 in order to eliminate bias. The reductase domain was excluded from this analysis. The A-chains of the P450 enzymes, 2CIB, 3EQM, 3GW9, 3DBG, 3LD6 and 2VE3 were used as templates. The homology 63 models were then augmented with the heme prosthetic group. The thiolate linkage between the heme iron and cysteinyl sulfur was first created, following which, geometry of the heme moiety was optimized using the BFGS energy minimization algorithm9 9 . The number of iterations in the BFGS algorithm was left uncapped in order to ensure convergence to the optimal geometry. Accuracy of the optimized geometry was verified by comparing the bond length of the thiolate linkage in the homology model to those that are typically observed in solved crystal structures of other P450s. The average bond length of the thiolate linkage for the 16 homology models was 2.56 quite favorably with the average thiolate bond length of 2.47 A, which compares A for the 6 templates. Table 4.1. Truncations & estimated pocket volumes of the 16 P450 monooxygenases investigated Annotation Truncation for modeling (# of amino acids) Untruncated length (# of amino acids) Pocket volume (A3) H1 10 484 256 H2 40 484 422 H3 50 501 601 H4 50 500 748 H5 40 492 395 H6 50 500 387 H7 40 483 400 H8 50 503 239 H9 45 497 610 H1O 50 507 559 HI 50 509 286 H12 35 485 250 H13 40 493 382 H14 45 498 250 H15 45 495 477 H16 50 499 474 64 The heme prosthetic group proceeds through 4 states during the P450 catalytic cycle (Figure 4.3) the ground, activated, peroxyheme and oxyferyl states. As the modeling approach cannot capture nor predict the dynamics of substrate orientation within the active site, a 'snapshot' methodology (Figure 4.4) that assesses the substrate pose at each stage of the P450 cycle and its eventual influence on the reactive pose viz. the pose that the substrate adopts just prior to reaction with the oxyferyl group, is implemented. NADPH -- Figure 4.3. The P450 catalytic Monooxygenase Reductase NADP+ 2e-+H* Ground R-H R-H From NADPH Fe FeI FAD + 2e + H*+ H* From intracellular environment S-Cys R-OH FADH2 cycle: Substrate binding within the H* 2 state F$ S-Cys 5cs ( 02 P450 active site activates the heme H*,e H', e(occurs only fter HO subst,.te R-H iron. Binding of molecular oxygen has bound) R-OH FADH2 2 FAD FADH' FADH AD FAD* FADH' Fe-, FDH* 5-Cys FMN FMNH.- FMN H*,e- FMNH~ FMN monooxygenase H, eShuttled to monooxygenase 0 0 H+.eShuttled to follows suit, and electrons supplied S y -Cys Fe ' I , OH H2O R-H R' .Fe5-Cys - H2O - Fe" * by NADPH are shuttled to the active site shortly after. Transition of the heme iron from the peroxy to the oxyferyl state reductively cleaves the oxygen molecule to form water. The oxyferyl species then oxidizes the substrate to typically form a hydroxylated product. 65 0 Ground state 0 / Zt+/ Fe3 S-Cys H 8-Cys Activated heme S-Cys Peroxyheme 8-Cys Oxyferyl heme Initiates ORM Figure 4.4. The 'snapshot' methodology: As the in silico models cannot capture dynamic changes in the active site of the P450 monooxygenases, the binding affinity between the substrate and each successive heme state in the P450 catalytic cycle is assessed in order to draw rational conclusions regarding the reactive proclivities of the enzymes. In the snapshot methodology, owing to our use of the BFGS energy minimization algorithm to optimize the geometry of heme in the active site, AUTODOCK was unable to distinguish between the ground and activated states of heme, and peroxy- and oxyferyl heme. The energy trajectory for the oxidation of taxadiene, therefore, was estimated by comparing the binding affinity of taxadiene in the active site that includes heme iron in its activated state to its affinity to the oxyferyl hemecontaining active site. Also, as AUTODOCK typically outputs a series of closely related poses from a single input, it was executed iteratively using the most energetically favorable output of one run as the input for the program's next implementation, until an unchanging set of substrate poses was obtained (Figure 4. 5). 66 POSOX, The docking algoithm outputs so poses ft, X2 8ufX 2 Figure 4.5. Substrate docking: As AUTODOCK outputs a series of the most energetically-favorable poses (which is significantly different from the series of likely poses), the exhaustive list of 9 poses is first culled to a smaller set of 2-3 poses by using an iterative algorithm that recasts the docking exercise as an unconstrained optimization. The 'optimization' loop is terminated when 3 successive iterations output a common set of poses with the same binding affinity. Accuracy of the docking program was assessed by evaluating the closeness of fit of the computationally predicted pose of androstenedione in the active site of human aromatase cytochrome P450 (CYP19A1) with the crystal structure of their association10. 4. 5. 2. 2. Using the diffusion of oxygen into the active site as a constraint The diffusional trajectory of oxygen into the activated heme-containing active site greatly limits the translational and rotational degrees of freedom the now-destabilized substrate has in order that it may assume a more stable position. This constraint was utilized to discriminate between the 67 numerous poses outputted by AUTODOCK in order to identify the single likeliest pose of taxadiene in both the activated and oxyferyl heme-containing active sites (Figure 4.6). The likeliest path that oxygen takes to diffuse into the active site was calculated using CAVER 0 1 . Pose B: PoseA: 4.8 Walmol -. kalmo 4.1 kcallmoI 4A kcaI/moI Figure 4.6. Diffusion of oxygen as a constraint: The modeling methodology identifies two possible reaction trajectories for the oxidation of taxadiene by the P450 hydroxylase. The first panel for both schemes represents binding of taxadiene to the activated heme-containing active site. The diffusion path of oxygen is highlighted in red in the second panel, and the reactive conformation that leads to substrate oxidation is depicted in the third panel. Both trajectories, however, predict competition between abstractions of the same 3 protons by the oxyferyl heme iron. These are, in their order of favorability, the protons attached to 3-, 13a- and 20-positions. This program re-casts the atom centers in the enzyme model as a Voronoi diagram, whose edges and vertices are then converted to a weighted graph. The Delaunay triangulation is later applied to the weighted graph and the likeliest path of oxygen diffusion is calculated using a modified Djikstra's algorithm. 4. 5. 2. 3. Method validation The computational methodology for studying P450-mediated substrate oxidation was validated by predicting the reaction trajectories for the dihydroxylation of vitamin D 3 by CYP105A1 (Figure 68 4.7). Vitamin D 3 is first hydroxylated at either the la- or 20-position, following which, the monohydroxylated product - la-hydroxy or 20-hydroxy vitamin D 3 - undergoes a second hydroxylation to form 1at,20-dihydroxy vitamin D 3. The modeling methodology's outputs compare favorably to the crystallographically determined substrate poses in both, the activated heme and oxyferyl heme active sites of CYP105A1 (PDB codes: 2ZBZ and 3CV9). The 5-10% difference between the binding affinities of the substrate to the activated heme and oxyferyl heme states of the P450 was also identified as an important constraint to identify likely poses from the other outputs of the docking program. VDs -+ 25-OH1-D 3 25-OH-D, -. 1a,25-(OH)rDa la-OH-D - 1a,25-(OH)rD 0 -2 Binding affinity (kcallimol) -10 4 4 -4 -12 VDs In CYPIOA1 2"-H-D3 In CYP10SA1 Activated home -10 kcallmol Activated home -10A kcailmoI 4.1 kcallmol Oxyferyl heme -7.9 kcallmol Oxyferyl heme Oxyferyl heme 4.1 kcallmol 4.9 kcallmol 34.5*6.9 min.maiCYP Activated heme 75.7 129.2 m. a-OH-O, In CYPIONGAI anActivated sOxyfaryl C Figure 4.7. Method validation via assessing docking of Vitamin D3 into active site of CYP105A1: The binding position of vitamin D 3 within the active site of CYP105A1 has been determined using X-ray crystallography for both, its activated and oxyferyl heme forms. Model validation proceeded by comparing its predictions of the reaction trajectories with the crystallographic structures of CYP105A1 bound to its substrate. 69 4. 5. 2. 4. Results of the reactivity landscape investigations The enzyme that has been annotated as taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase in the sequences derived from the Taxus cDNA library is re-annotated as H16 in the computational assessment described herein. It is evident that taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase is a very promiscuous enzyme (Figure 4.8). Interestingly, none of the other 16 P450s exhibit 5a-hydroxylase activity. H6 is predicted to exhibit 10p-hydroxylase activity, and the computational methodology corroborates it annotation in GenBank. H13, on the other hand, appears to catalyze stereo- and regiospecific 7p-hydroxylation of taxadiene but is annotated as a 1Op-hydroxylase in GenBank. This dissonance merits further investigation but has not been pursued in this study. H9, on the other hand, is predicted to be a taxadiene-5a-ol 1Op-hydroxylase, and, H4 is predicted to catalyze the 2a-hydroxylation of taxadiene-5a,10p,13a-triol. Additionally, the size of the active site (in A3) does necessarily correlate with promiscuity. For instance, H9, which is estimated to possess the second largest active site among the 16 P450 monooxygenases does not exhibit any activity (as predicted by our computational methodology) to substrates bearing substitutions at more than a single carbon atom on the taxane scaffold. 70 H1 H2 H3 H44 H5 H6 H7 HS H9 H10 H11 H12 H13 H14 H15 H16 TaxadleneI Taxadlen4a-Wo Taxadlen-100-ol 5a,100-di 2a,Ga,100-trol a91003-triol 6aa,100,13a-ttro1 2a,Sa,9a,10-%trol I 9 Ol0"o 2a,6a10,13a-tetrol 2a,a,9a,10p,13a-pentol 2a,a,10,13a-tetol--one 2a,6a,9a,100-tetrol-13-one 6a-ethanoate -10 kcalimol -10 kcallmol 10% -10% Activated home Oxyferyl home acnergy diference between activ a OxyfeIl stat.. Figure 4.8. Taxane biosynthetic reactivity landscape: All 16 P450 enzymes from the Taxus cDNA library were included in the analysis. The enzymes were designated as H1-H16. The reactivity of an enzyme towards a substrate is affirmed using the 5-10% difference in binding affinities between the activated and oxyferyl states of the enzymes, as was previously established for the dihydroxylation of vitamin D 3 by CYP 10 5AL. 4. 6. Implications of the computational investigations on metabolic engineering An important consideration in pharmacophore design is its potential use as an input for conventional target-oriented synthesis (TOS)"10, an exercise that aims to access precise regions of chemical space - either a single molecule or a small assortment of molecules exhibiting minor variations on a chemical theme. Natural product biosynthetic pathways typically consist of a large 71 number of reactions that are controlled by fairly complex regulatory mechanisms. Manipulating the metabolism of simple microorganisms to accommodate the expression of every single enzyme of the paclitaxel biosynthetic pathway is a prohibitively long process and is perhaps infeasible owing to the physiological stress that the expression of such a large set of enzymes might induce within the host. Instead, synthesizing an advanced intermediate that acts as a gateway molecule for TOS via the expression of a vastly smaller set of enzymes takes advantage of the core competencies of both, metabolic engineering and synthetic chemistry. Based on our computational analysis and bio- and retrosynthetic planning for the production of paclitaxel (Figure 4.9), we have identified (1,2a,5a,7p,10p)-5-acetyloxy-1,2,7,10-tetrahydroxy-tax4,11 -diene as a potential product of microbial metabolic engineering. Our analysis suggests that expressing H16, H9 and H6 in a strain expressing taxadiene should, in theory, yield taxadiene2a,5a,10s-triol. Of these enzymes, H16 might have to be significantly re-engineered in order to minimize its promiscuity towards taxanes other than taxadiene. H13, which catalyzes 7p-hydroxylation of taxadiene, and H4, which hydroxylates taxadiene5a,103,13a-triol at the 1-carbon, will also need to be sufficiently re-engineered to alter their substrate preference to taxadiene-2a,5a,100-triol and its 7p- or 1-hydroxy derivative. Target yields and productivities to ensure cost-competitiveness of a microbial-based process manufacturing (1,2a, 5a,7p, 100)-5-acetyloxy- 1,2,7,1 0-tetrahydroxy-tax-4, 11 -diene have been calculated in Chapter 6. 72 O AcO 0 AcO H b NH H OTES 0 HO 0 C d NH 0 f N N H og _ NH2 OH HO H 0 HO h 0 9 O0 0 0 OH OTES O OH O0- A O O 0 OTES OTES n k OH O O )( 0 O 0 0 0 OTES 0 OTES 0 O0OH OTES OH OTES OTES S t 0 0 O O- O- H O0 00UO 0 HO 0 C 0 00OTES 0 0 HO HO HO O 0 OTES + 0 / HO O 0 0 OTES OH 00 HOt 0 HO0 0 - H0 OTES H~ 0 Paclitaxel Figure 4.9. TOS of paclitaxel: The synthesis of paclitaxel in our scheme commences from (1,2a,5a,7p,10p)-5-acetyloxy-1,2,7,10tetrahydroxy-tax-4,1 1-diene (A). The synthesis scheme comprises of 22 steps and the yield of paclitaxel is 1.9%. Key: a.CH 2Cl2 (yield 99%); b. Et 3N, 2-acetoxyacetyl chloride, CH 2Cl 2 (65%); c. (NH 4) 2Ce(NO 3)6, CH 3CN (80%); d. MeOH, Na 2CO 3 (82%); e. TESCI, pyridine (89%); f 4-DMAP, Et 3N, benzoyl chloride, CH 2Cl 2 (82%); g. CDI, NaH, DMF (8 1%); h. TESCl, pyridine (85%); i. H 5 10 6 , CH 3CN, PCC (97%); j. dioxane, MeOH, KOH (99%); k. quinuclidine, NMO, tBuOH, NaBH 4, Os04, THF (64%); L.4-DMAP, CH 3 COCl, CH 2Cl 2 (79%); m. 4-DMAP, MsCl, CH 2 Cl 2 (84%); n. K2 CO 3 , MeOH (80%); o. HMPA, DIEA (77%); p. 4-DMAP, (CH 3 CO)2 0, CH 2 Cl 2 (70%); q. PhLi, CH 3COOH, THF, cyclohexane (70%); r. tBuOK, (PhSeO) 20, THF (90%); S. 4-DMAP, (CH 3CO)2 0, pyridine (50%); t. CH 3COONa, PCC, NaBH4, benzene, MeOH (8 1%); u. NaH, THF (68%); 10 v. MeOH, 32% HC (90%). SciFinder SciPlanner, Reaxys, ARChem and published literature 3-113 were referenced to conceive this original synthetic scheme. 73 Chapter 5 RE-ENGINEERING TAXADIEN-5a-HYDROXYLASE As was presented in Chapter 4, H16, or taxadien-5a-hydroxylase, is a supposedly a highly promiscuous cytochrome P450 monooxygenase, and, as set out in that chapter, the reactivity of this enzyme would have to be altered in order to minimize flux dissipation away from the eventual product of interest, (1,2c,5a,7p,1Op)-5-acetyloxy-1,2,7,10-tetrahydroxy-tax-4,11-diene. Traditional enzyme engineering methodologies such as directed evolution and site-directed mutagenesis each have their merits. However, as P450 homologs share ~15% amino acid sequence identity and -30% sequence similarity with one another 14, the use of structure-guided approaches is preferred since the insights gained from redesigning one active site could easily be extended to manipulating the reactive proclivities of another P450, drastically reducing strain development times for the production of secondary metabolites. This is particularly true for the semi-synthetic manufacturing scheme proposed in Figure 4.9, which bears a preponderance of P450-catalyzed reactions in the biosynthetic stage. Approaches that are more rapid and more economical than conventional techniques such as X-ray crystallography and NMR, though, are required. 75 In this chapter, we build on the modeling methodology prescribed in Chapter 4 to formulate a robust and generalizable methodology to assess the mechanistic basis for the promiscuity and lack of selectivity of plant P450 enzymes. The methodology populates one's understanding of the biocatalytic mechanism using well-established experimental protocols such as phylogeny-driven and site-directed mutagenesis, and computational techniques such as homology modeling and substrate docking. The insights that are gained from this exercise can be applied to chart the reactive topography of the active site and identify the impact of individual structural features on stability, activity and selectivity, potentially opening up possibilities to specifically tune the reactivity of plant P 4 50s. Such tunable production of oxidized polycyclic compounds using microbial metabolic engineering represents a significant step towards realizing more exhaustive prospection and sustainable production of natural products and their analogues for drug discovery and development. 5. 1. Background about P450 monooxygenases P450 monooxygenases constitute a large family of highly conserved, heme-thiolate enzymes that are present in all forms of life7 2. They usually act in concert with a flavoprotein redox partner - a cytochrome P450 reductase - that shuttles electrons and protons derived from NADPH to the oxygenase's active site, whereat molecular oxygen is protonated and heterolytically cleaved to form water and a reactive iron-oxygen species that then inserts the second oxygen atom into the substrate 7 3 (Figure 4.3). In mammals, mitochrondrial P450s play vital roles in the steroid biosynthetic pathway and also orchestrate the breakdown of drugs and xenobiotics. In plants, microsomal P450s are an 76 integral component of the secondary metabolic apparatus that plays vital roles in communication, defense, development and reproduction. 5. 2. Materials & methods 5. 2. 1. Strains & plasmids Our research group had previously engineered E coli K12 MG1655 lrecA iendA to synthesize taxadiene at titers of about 300 mg/L and 1 g/L in 2 mL batch cultures and 1 L fed-batch cultures, respectively 59 . In this strain, additional copies of the rate-limiting steps of the non-mevalonate pathway dxs, ispD, ispF and idi were integrated into the chromosome of the aforementioned E coli strain using the FRT system under the control of the Trc promoter, and, the taxadiene biosynthetic apparatus, which consists of ggps (GGPP synthase) and txs (taxadiene synthase) was expressed on a 5copy, pACYCDUET-1 vector under the control of a T 7 promoter. For production of the hydroxylated taxanes, the taxadiene biosynthetic apparatus, along with the T 7 promoter that controls its expression, was also integrated onto the chromosome of the E. coli strain and the operon was localized to the arabinose operon with a kanamycin antibiotic marker. This strain was then electrotransformed to express the P450 apparatus consisting of P450 monooxygenase and its redox partner, also on a 5-copy, pACYCDUET-1 vector (Figure 5.1). Plasmid construction and sub-cloning was performed using chemically competent DH5a cells (purchased from Invitrogen). XL10-Gold ultracompetent cells (purchased from Agilent) were used to select the P450 mutants. 77 t24A-CYP Bovine 17a rrnB antitermination signa P(trc) rrnB TT lacO P(lac) transcription start poin 6xHis tag inker aadAI CPR repA lacl ACYCDuetUPI Primer #71178-3 pCL-Trc09-t24CYP-CPR 97 28bp Figure 5.1. Map of plasmid expressing the P450 system 5. 2. 2. Culturing conditions Biosynthesis of taxadien-5a-ol by the engineered E. coli strain was investigated in 2 mL batch cultures. Pre-cultures propagated in 20 pg/mL chloramphenicol-supplemented LB medium were used to inoculate the 2 mL production cultures at a starting OD of 0.1. The production medium comprised of 5 g/L yeast extract, 20 ptg/mL chloramphenicol, 0.66 g/L 6-aminolevulinic acid, 13.3 g/L KH 2PO 4, 4 g/L (NH4) 2HPO 4, 1.7 g/L citric acid, 0.0084 g/L EDTA, 0.0025 g/L CoCl2, 0.015 g/L MnC 2, 0.0015 g/L CuCl 2 , 0.003 g/L H 3BO 3 , 0.0025 g/L Na 2 MoO 4 , 0.008 g/L (CH 3COO) 2Zn, 0.06 g/L Fe(III) citrate, 0.0045 g/L thiamine, 1.3 g/L MgSO4, 10 g/L glycerol and 0.024 g/L IPTG. The starting pH was set to 7.0 and 20 vol.% dodecane was added to the production medium to scavenge the nascent taxane. The cultures were agitated at 200 rpm at 220C and production was ceased after 5 days by extracting the product into 1 mL of a 80-20 vol.% 78 solution of hexane and diethyl ether. The organic phase was later separated and analyzed for its taxane content using GC-MS. 5. 2. 3. GC-MS analysis of hydroxylated taxanes 1 mL of the batch cultures was combined with an equal volume of a 80-20 vol.% hexane-diethyl ether solution and vortexed for 30-45 minutes. The vortexed mixture was then centrifuged at 3000 rcf at room temperature. The organic layer so-formed was then analyzed in a Varian Saturn 3800 GC 2000 MS system housing an Agilent HP-5ms column (30 m length, 0.25 mm ID, 0.25 pm film thickness). Ultrapure helium was used as the carrier gas (flow rate of 1 mL/min). Each analysis lasted 30 minutes, wherein the oven temperature was maintained at 50C for 1 minute, ramped up at a rate of 1OOC/min until it reach 2200C, and then held at 2200C for 12 minutes). The injector and transfer line temperatures were maintained at 2000C and 250 oC respectively. 5. 2. 4. Protein engineering for optimal expression of taxadiene Sa-hydroxylase inE. coli The amino-terminal transmembrane binding regions of the P450 monooxygenase (GenBank AY289209) and it redox partner (GenBank AY571340) were eliminated in order to favor expression in E. coli. 24 and 74 amino acids were excised from the P450 and reductase, respectively. An 8-amino acid (MALLIAVF) leader sequence of a modified 1 5 bovine microsomal steroid 17a- hydroxylase (GenBank NM_174304) was subsequently appended to the truncated P450 to 79 improve expression and stability. The chimeric P450 and the truncated reductase were then fused together using a 5-amino acid (GSTGS) linker' 1 6 (Figure 5.2). A. Biosynthetic pathway G3P co, NADP 1 - DOXP NADPH Pyruvate chm PP ADP MEP 2 IapE 1p0 Native pathway (N H20 I MECPP ATP CTP AIpC CMP CDP-MEP CDP-ME H201 HMBPP 2e- Jap Id GGPP Taxediene 3 DP DP NADPH+ 02 ggpe t0 2e ApG IepF NADP'+ H20 IPP L*DMAPPj-. cy Taxadien-So.oi pr Heterologous pathway Rate-iknimngsteps) B. Strain construction * X--~.Ai,,&-* 1* + Non-mevalonste pathway is expressed natively Extra copies of rate-limiting enzymes on the chromosome 0 X+ + Texadiene biosynthetic genes Integrated Into the chromosome Monooxygenamereductase fusion protein expressed on a plasmid C. Fusion protein construction Leader sequence froma binding region (TBR) N C C Monooxygensee s N CC W TBRexcision C r"- N C Un ethmpiMrcy acustitoonsureopumal electron shuttng i7artydroxyles, N C EnzymeUitilng . Figure 5.2. Overview of the strain and enzyme engineering protocols used in the study 5. 2. 5. Site-directed mutagenesis The Quick Change II Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit was used to mutagenize taxadiene 5ahydroxylase in the P450-reductase complex. The mutants were constructed using a protocol recommended by the kit manufacturer, Agilent, and the mutagenesis primers were also designed using a software package hosted on the manufacturer's website. (http://www.genomics.agilent.com/primerDesignProgram.jsp). 5. 3. Results 5. 3. 1. Taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase is a promiscuous enzyme As predicted by the modeling methodology outlined in Chapter 4, instead of detecting a single peak that corresponds to taxadien-5a-ol, 15 species are consistently identified in the gas chromatograms of the samples upon expression of taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase (Figure 5.3), lending credence to the hypothesis that P450s that catalyze transformations in the early stages of plant secondary metabolic pathways are promiscuous. In the case of taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase, it appears that the enzyme is also very poorly selective. The taxadiene (species B) content in the samples is negligible, suggesting that it is completely converted to downstream products. Intriguingly, taxadien-5a-ol (K) is not the major product (Figure 5.4). That distinction goes to the cyclic ether, 5(12)-oxa-3(1 1)-cyclotaxane (OCT, I), a structural isomer of taxadien-5ac-ol. Mass spectral analysis of the remaining 13 products confirms that they are eicosanoids, 7 of which are monooxygenated (species A, C, G, H, J, K, M and P), 3 are dioxygenated (L, N and 0) and 3 are unsubstituted (D, E and F). Species G is a structural isomer of OCT and it is evident that D, E and F are non-taxanes. However, the low abundance and instability of these molecules has hitherto precluded elucidation of their structures. It is uncertain how many of the remaining 9 species are taxanes. 81 A. Gas chromatogran - Kilocounts 400- A B C D E F G H GGPS-TXS strain J K I L GGPS-TXS-CYP-CPR strain N O M Kilocounts P 2M0 350 300 1600 2000 250 200 1000 100 - -.-l 0 10. I1 21.00 23.30 22.20 0 24.58 Retention tke (minutes) B. Mass spectra Spectracolor coding: black - non-hydroxylated ecosanode. red - monohydroxylated elcosanode, blue - dihydroxylated elcosanolds 100% 48. 140.6 249.5 34.5 mix 49 149.6 249.6 349.5 M11 100% 100% 149.5 249.6 349.6 m/x 406 240.6 30.6 40. Species I 149.5 249.5 340.6 40.5 20.6 249.1 340.5 49.6 249.6 349.5 nVZ 00 1 %r 140.5 240.6 34.5 48. 143.6 249.5 348.5 nVZ Species H 100% 149.6 24.5 3495 48.6 Species K 100% 149.6 SpeclesD 100% 149.6 40.6 34.6 m/x Species 0 SpeciesJ 100% 149.5 100% 100% 140.5 100% Species C Species F Species E 40. 49.1 Species B: Taxedlen.e SpeciesA 48.1 100% 100% 149.6 248.5 34 Species L 100% 100% 100% 4. 148.5 240. SpeclesM 3465 ms 4. 140.5 24.6 SpeciesN 340.5 4. 14. 249.6 Speces 0 343.5 msx 4. 148.6 24. 34A SpeclesP Figure 5.3. Promiscuity & poor selectivity of taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase: (A) Typical gas chromatograms of the organic extracts from fermentation broths populated by strains expressing only the taxadiene synthesis module (black) and the taxadiene-P450 modules (red) reveal the presence of as many as 16 eicosanoids (labeled A-P), all of which elute from the column after approximately 20 minutes of the analysis has been completed. The katharometric signal strengths of the species (y-axis) have been expressed in kilocounts and the retention times have been reported in minutes (x-axis). (B) Fragments with the highest m/z ratio were normalized to an intensity of 100% in the mass spectral plots of the 16 eicosanoids (spectral plots in black - non-hydroxylated C 2os, red - monooxygenated C 20s, and blue - dioxygenated C 20s). 82 -2500 400 350 2000 300 250 1500 1000 150H 100 500 50 0 19.81 0 21.00 22.20 23.39 24.58 Retention time (minutes) Figure 5.4. Characterized structures of some of the products: OCT, a cyclic ether, is the major product and elutes a little after 21 minutes in the 30-minute GC-MS run. Taxadiene elutes after roughly 20 minutes and the less-volatile taxadien-5c-ol is detected close to 21.5 minutes. The katharometric signal strengths of the species (y-axis) have been expressed in kilocounts and the retention times have been reported in minutes (x-axis). 5. 3. 2. Temporal profile of taxadiene proto-oxidation The monooxygenase catalytic cycle proceeds under tight thermodynamic control, wherein molecular oxygen is reductively cleaved to form water and the oxidized substrate. In some instances, the catalytic cycle is shunted and produces hydrogen peroxide instead of water. In situ substrate dihydroxylation, therefore, is neither mechanistically nor thermodynamically feasible for P450 monooxygenases such as taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase. The re-diffusion of a nascent monooxygenated product into the P450 active site, followed by its participation in a second oxidation cycle appears to be the only likely explanation for formation of the dioxygenated eicosanoids. Moreover, not only is this interpretation in agreement with the 83 hypothesis regarding P450 promiscuity, but adding polymeric bead-conjugated silyl-based scavengers similar to the packing material of reversed-phase HPLC columns to the culture medium greatly reduces eicosanoid production, more so the production of the dioxygenated compounds' 17. Accordingly, daily production of the 16 eicosanoids was tracked (Figure 5.5) in order to derive qualitative temporal relationships between the species. The absence of taxadiene on all days of the production run points to high activity of the P450. Of the remaining 15 species, only G, H, OCT, taxadien-5t-ol, M and N are detected after 1 day of culturing. The remaining eicosanoids accumulate only after 2 days. These trends possibly suggest that G, H, OCT, taxadien-5a-ol and M are oxidized derivatives of taxadiene. The concentrations of D and C exhibit similar trends to that of H. Species A, C, P and J, therefore, appear to be oxidized derivatives of D, while C could be the source of L and 0. Interestingly, assessing the rates of change in the concentration of all species clusters the species into 3 groups - one comprising of G, OCT, J, taxadien-5a-ol, L, P and 0; another which includes A, E, F, M and N; and a third group consisting of C, D and H (Figure 5.5.). The rate of change in the concentrations of a species is simply the sum of the rate at which it is formed, the rate at which it is consumed by a downstream metabolic reaction, the rate at which it inhibits host growth or the activity of the enzyme that synthesizes it, and its volatilization rate. The similarity in the variation in rates of change in the concentrations between species from one group but the difference in the variation in rates between species from different groups provides a qualitative snapshot of their 84 propensities to participate in another P450 catalytic cycle, as well as their volatilities and inhibitory effects. Daily production titers for all eicosanoids mg/L mg/L 12.00 6.00 2.50 mg/L 2.00- 1.25 100 0,00 0.00 0.00 0 2 1 3 4 5 Days 0 2 1 3 4 0 5 Days mgIL 2.50 mgIL 60.00 - 1.75 1.25 30.00 - 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 0.00 0 5Days 1 2 3 4 0 5Days mg/L 25.00 mg/L 80.00 4.00 12.50 40.00 1 2 4 3 5 Days 0 1 2 3 4 5 Days 0 Species I Species H 5 Days 2 3 4 5Days 1 2 3 4 5 Days Species J mg/L 16.00- mg/L 7.50 mg/L 30.00 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 Species G mg/L 8.00 0 ' 1 Species F Species E 2 Species D mg/L 3.50 0 1 Species C SpeciesA 5.00 8.00- 15.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 Days 0 1 2 3 4 Species L Species K mg/L mg/L 750 20.00 3.75 1 2 3 4 Species N 5Days 1 2 3 4 5 Days Species M mg/L 20.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 5 Days 0 1 2 3 Species 0 4 SDays 0 1 2 3 4 5 Days Species P Figure 5.5. Daily variation in eicosanoid production titers: Concentrations of all 16 eicosanoids (in mg/L) were measured on each day of the 5-day runs. The concentrations were calculated from the katharometric signal strengths using a calibration curve for taxadiene. Error bars represent standard deviations (n = 3). Of the 16 species, taxadiene (species B) is undetectable on all 5 days and only G, H, J, K, M and N can be detected after 24 hours of the run have been completed. 85 -.- G -+-1 -+-J -+-K -+-L -+-P - -o -*-A -wE .oF +M -N 100 k -C -eD oH 15 s 150 10 - 50 5 30 (nM/day) (nWday) 20 (nday) 0 -10 -20 -100 0 1 2 3 Day 4 5 -10 0 1 2 3 Day 4 5 0 1 3 2 4 5 Day Figure 5.6. Assessment of the daily variation in the rate of change in the concentrations of the 16 eicosanoids: Daily variations in the forward derivative of the concentrations of the species with respect to time (in mM/day) have been plotted for 15 eicosanoid species - A, C-P. Trends suggest that the compounds fall into three groups. G, OCT (I), J, taxadien-5a-ol (K), L, P and 0 comprise one group. The second group includes A, E, F, M and N. C, D and H form a third group. Species from two groups do not appear to react further, but that members of the first group are more volatile and/or exert a greater inhibitory effect than those of the latter. The variation in the rate of the change of C and H suggests that they are likeliest sources of the dioxygenated molecules. The variation in their rates of change suggests that species from the first two groups do not appear to react further, but. that members of the first group are more volatile and/or exert a greater inhibitory effect than those of the latter. The variation in the rate of the change of D suggests that it reacts with the P450 to yield several oxygenated non-taxanes, whereas C and H appears to be the likeliest sources of the 3 dioxygenated molecules (Figure 5.7). The formation of D, E and F is particularly intriguing. We speculate that these molecules are formed in response to the concerted effect of inhibition by the oxygenated taxanes and a high flux through the prenyl pyrophosphate biosynthetic pathway. 86 H GGPP - Taxadiene(B) -N I K +E F -- M -+A -C -D - - L& O +P Figure 5.7. Speculative reaction scheme 5. 3. 3. The utility of traditional mutagenic practices to improve P450 reactivity 5. 3. 3. 1. Phylogeny-guided mutagenesis of taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase As mentioned in Section 4.1, the Taxus cDNA library from which the sequence of taxadiene 5ahydroxylase was obtained contains an additional 15 P450 monooxygenases. It was reasoned that replacing amino acid residues within the active site of taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase with similarly positioned residues in its paralogs could perhaps shed light on the reactive contributions of each residue. Consequently, all amino acids located at the periphery of the active site cavity predicted from the modeling methodology were replaced using a multiple sequence alignment of all P450 sequences in the Taxus cDNA library that was then utilized to identify substitutions for the selected amino acids (Figure 5.8). 87 Bits 4 2 1c2 2I3 2 1 L52 61 1 N1 Figure 5.8. Targets for phylogeny-guided mutagenesis: Amino acid residues that fall within 3.5 A of the periphery of the active site cavity of taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase are compared to its homologs in this multiple sequence alignment. Amino acids located at the periphery of the active site are labeled with a red circle. Numbers below the red circles denote the number of mutations investigated at that site. The multiple sequence alignment was created in WebLogo, a webbased service. The use of bits instead of probabilities is a feature of the program. 3.5 bits corresponds to a probability of 1, suggesting complete conservation across all the homologs. Many phylogeny-derived mutants exhibit vastly improved activities compared to the parental P450 (Figure 5.9). The activity is calculated by summing the molarities of all oxygenated eicosanoids produced by the enzyme. Selectivity, on the other hand, is simply the ratio between the molarity of taxadien-5ca-ol and the activity of the enzyme. 88 nM of al nM of all hydroxylated elcosanolds droxylte elcosanoda 150% - E 0% 0 -150% Mutation: 5124E Q128A 0128S K131L K131E S301F T14OG T140A T140V R141K R1411 L225F L225V V374A V374L T377S T377N T377Y T377C S302A S302V S302L 150% r75%- 0% 0% -150% Mutation: S302M S302G S302F L303M D300E V3741 T3771 L483V L483F P434A Figure 5.9. Activity and selectivity comparisons between the mutant and parental P450: Percent changes in the selectivities (gray) and activities (black) of the 32 mutants are compared to those of the parental enzyme. Selectivity is defined as the ratio of the concentration of taxadien-5a-ol to all hydroxylated eicosanoids. Activity is defined as the sum of the concentrations of all hydroxylated eicosanoids. Concentrations have been converted to nM. Many phylogenyderived mutants exhibit vastly improved activities and selectivities compared to the parental P450. Amino acid mutations that improve enzyme selectivity can be distributed into 3 categories. If one assumes that product formation depends on the regiospecificity of the proton that is abstracted by the oxyferyl species of the heme group in the P450 active site, competing proton abstractions could explain the distribution of products formed by a single catalytic cycle. Consequently, the first class amino acid mutations include those that improve product selectivity by directly affecting the probability of regiospecific proton abstraction viz. improvements in 'reaction selectivity'. Product 89 selectivity can also be improved by disfavoring the association between the enzyme and its other substrates, viz. controlling the promiscuity of the enzyme. Mutations that achieve this result fall into the second category - improvements in 'overall selectivity'. The third group includes amino acid mutations that affect both, the probability of regiospecific proton abstraction and enzyme promiscuity. E SA E PAI +PA2+PA S - E'PB1+ Pa2 Desired product Activity = [PA1] + [Pa] + [PA] + [Pml + [Pe21 Overall selectivity = Reaction selectivity = [PA1 [PA11 + [PA2l + [PA! + [PMl + IP621 [Al] [PA1l + [Pu] + [Pu] Figure 5.10. Differentiating the two types of selectivity improvements Apparently, nearly all phylogeny-guided mutations investigated herein fall in the second category (Figures 5.10 and 5.11). The product distribution of T377S is particularly surprising as it appears to favor oxygenation of the non-taxane, C, to produce the dioxygenated eicosanoid, 0. 5. 3. 3. 2. Mutations to taxadiene 5u-hydroxylase based on structural inferences Of the amino acid mutations exhibiting improvements in activity and/or selectivity, K131E and 90 D309E were investigated in further detail. Not only are these residues highly conserved, but K131 and D309 form a dyad that extends laterally across the roof of the active site, parallel to the heme moiety below. It was hypothesized that modifications to these residues could potentially affect the orientation in which taxadiene and the other unsubstituted eicosanoids bind within the active site (Figure 5.12). *A AC eG mH x1 +J AL *K oM oN -O xP 8 7 - A 6 A A .C U' Vl S 2 A A A + +. A, 4. 4. I * 2 1 U 0 0 Mutation: S124E C1128A Q1283 A K131L K131E T140G T140A T140V R141K R1411 L225F I a L225V 301F S302A S302V S302L 10 9 a 7 8 A 2 1 0 Mutation: S302M 3302G 3302F L303M D30BE V374A V3741 V374L T377S T377N T3771 T377Y T377C L483V L483F P434A Figure 5.11. Grouping the selectivity improvements: The fold change of the concentration of a particular eicosanoid is simply the ratio of the concentration of the species produced by the mutant to that produced by the parental enzyme. Significant variations between the fold changes of products of the same catalytic cycle is indicative of direct manipulations to the catalytic cycle viz. improvements in reaction selectivities. D309 is the only mutation that exhibits quantifiable differences in the selectivity towards taxadien-5a-ol (K) that can be attributed to possible differences in the 91 probability of abstracting a specific proton (species G, I, K, which potentially are products of the same catalytic cycle, are colored red). Accordingly, a series of mutants combining site-saturation mutagenesis at both locations of the dyad and other phylogeny-guided mutants were constructed and evaluated for their influence on the activity and selectivity of taxadiene 5ct-hydroxylase (Figure 5.13). The number of mutations varied from a single-site mutation to as many as 6 simultaneous mutations. The mutation frequency seemed to have a deleterious effect on enzyme function. The production of oxygenated compounds was all but abolished for enzymes bearing 4 mutations in their amino acid sequence. Figure 5.12. The lysine-aspartate dyad: The high D309V degree of conservation functional groups and of their these residues, relative sizes their were instrumental in their selection as mutation targets. A double-mutant combining substitutions to K131 and D309 with arginine exhibited the greatest improvement in selectivity. However, as before, the increase in selectivity is attributable to disfavoring the formation of the mono- and dioxygenated eicosanoids (Figure 5.14). It is evident that phylogeny-guided and site-directed mutageneses do not alter any proton abstraction 92 probabilities in the catalytic cycle that yields, among others, taxadien-5ct-ol. A double-mutant combining substitutions to K131 and D309 with arginine exhibited the greatest improvement in selectivity. 0 K131-D309 mitiagenesis series 0 Phylogeny-guided mutagenesis % change inactivity over 150% - parental enzyme 3 0 100% - -m C 50f- 0 1 0 m LI %change inoverall 0 selectivity over U U parental enzyme Eman I V U -_U IV 0 V0 -50% -100% 0 0 0 0o *} 4substitutions M 0 * 50% b*"0 Eb 3 -100% - 100% 0 0 odp 10 0 0 K131R + 0309R Figure 5.13. Influence of mutations to the dyad and amino acids at the periphery of the active site: Selectivity is defined as the ratio of the concentration of taxadien-5a-ol to all hydroxylated eicosanoids. Activity is defined as the sum of the concentrations of all hydroxylated eicosanoids. Concentrations have been converted to nM. Percent changes in the selectivities (gray) and activities (black) of the 32 mutants are compared to those of the parental enzyme. The phylogenyguided mutants were single-site mutants. Single- and multi-site mutations were investigated in the K131-D309 study. Increasing the number of mutations appears to have a deleterious effect on enzyme function. Enzyme constructs bearing >4 mutations formed very little product. However, as before, the increase in selectivity is attributable to disfavoring the formation of the mono- and dioxygenated eicosanoids (Figure 5.14). It is evident that phylogeny-guided and sitedirected mutageneses do not alter any proton abstraction probabilities in the catalytic cycle that yields, among others, taxadien-5a-ol. *A AC *G EH +J Xi OK AL OM ON -O XP 4.5 4 3.5 3 A 2.5 .o I 2 + 1.5 0.5 0 a M I V U 4 A A S U a A N D U F D309 srirs Y A B I a K131 series a M A A I A F V Y K131R+ D306 series R F W N E K131R + P484A + D309 series Figure 5.14. Improving reaction selectivity is a non-trivial challenge: Like in Figure 5.11, the fold change in the concentration of particular species simply refers to the ratio of its concentration as produced by a given mutant to the concentration obtained by expressing the parental enzyme. None of the mutants constructed in the study thus far improve product selectivity by directly affecting the probability of regiospecific proton abstraction. Instead, selectivity improvements have been achieved by disfavoring the association between the P450 and its other substrates. 5. 3. 4. Computational assessment of the taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase catalytic cycle The preponderance of amino acid mutations that improve product selectivity by destabilizing binding of competing substrates over mutations that alter the orientation of taxadiene within the 94 active site germinated computational investigations to understand the mechanistic basis for the enzyme's peculiar product distribution. The computational methodology discussed in Section 4. 5. 2 was utilized for this purpose. Oxidation of the substrate typically proceeds via the oxygen rebound mechanism (Figure 5.15)'18. Proton abstraction by the oxygen atom of oxyferyl heme forms a radical intermediate and a hydroxyiron species, the latter which then dissociates via a rebound mechanism to form the carbon-oxygen bond. The heme group simultaneously returns to its pre-reaction, activated state, and, radical stabilization, where possible, determines the abundance of the oxygenated products. R- Re Re H H 0 - S-Cys 0 0 F03+ F03+ S-Cys S-Cys e- S-Cys Figure 5.15. The oxygen rebound mechanism: The oxygen rebound mechanism involves the formation of a hydroxyiron species, which then dissociates to insert oxygen into the substrate. Bond-breaking and bond-forming electron migrations are depicted in red and blue, respectively. Analysis of the average position of the two likeliest poses of taxadiene in the oxyferyl state of taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase suggests that proton abstractions occur at as many as 3 positions on the taxane scaffold (Figure 5.16). Abstraction of any one of the three protons attached at the 20position produces allyl-stabilized radical species at the 20- and 5-positions (Figure 5.17.), which 95 then yield taxadien-20-ol (4) and taxadien-5a-ol (5), respectively. Taxadien-5a-ol is more abundant than taxadien-20-ol as the 5-position secondary carbon radical is the more stable of the two allylstabilized radical intermediates. Figure A 13" ~F 5.16. abstractions Overview of the competing from taxadiene: The proton energy-averaged structure of the two likeliest orientations of taxadiene in the active site (poses A and B in Figure 4.6.) suggests that as many as 3 proton abstractions might be occurring. In the B order of preference, these are at the 3-, 13a-, and 5aEnergy-averapd pose positions. In comparison, abstraction of the sole proton that is attached at the 3-position produces a tertiary carbon radical. However, as insertion of oxygen at this position appears to be sterically hindered, the lone electron shifts to the tertiary carbon at the 12-position. This transfer does not mitigate the steric hindrance to the oxygen rebound mechanism either. Instead, we speculate that the close proximity of the alkenyl moiety to the hydroxy-iron species and the tertiary carbon radical facilitates a concerted sequence of electron exchanges that results in the addition of the oxygen atom to the carbons at the 5- and 12-positions to form OCT (8). This explanation for ether formation is different from that of a previous study on the OCT biosynthesis" 9 . However, oxidation of taxadiene in the reaction mechanism detailed therein does not proceed via the oxygen rebound mechanism and neither can it explain formation of, among others, taxadien-5a-ol and OCT in the same active site. 96 Y 3 12 11 c 136 b 6 3 a 20 1 Taxadlene ) D? 6 9I I I I 9 10 H 4 Taxad on)-20-ol 5 Taxadien-5a-ol Fe 8 OCT Ether formation mechanism 9 11 Ether formation mechanism I 14o 12 Taxadien-13ool 13 Figure 5.17. Hypothesized reaction mechanism: In silico models of the binding of taxadiene in the active site of taxadiene 5ahydroxylase predict competition between the abstraction of protons from the (a) 20-, (b) 3- and (c) 13a-positions. Radical species formed via proton abstractions from the 20- and 13a-positions are allyl-stabilized. Insertion of oxygen to the 3- and 12-positions is sterically inhibited. Formation of OCT following proton abstraction from the 3-position is hypothesized to proceed via the constrained Markovnikov-like addition of oxygen to the 5- and 12-positions. Lastly, proton abstraction from the carbon at the 13a-position produces taxadiene-13a-ol (12) and yet another cyclic ether species, 5(13)-oxa-3(11)-cyclotaxane (13). Preliminary NMR characterization of the oxygenated eicosanoids appears to support this hypothesis and has also identified species G to be 5(13)-oxa-3(11)-cyclotaxane 0 . 5. 3. 5. Computational assessment of taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase mutants We applied our computational methodology to investigate the higher incidence of phylogeny-guided and dyad mutants that improve product selectivity by destabilizing binding of competing substrates over mutants that alter the reaction trajectory of taxadiene oxidation (Figure 5.18). Of all the mutants that were constructed previously, K131R, S302A and V374L exhibited deducible differences in the selectivity towards 5(13)-oxa-3(1 1)-cyclotaxane (G), H, OCT (I), taxadien-5c-ol (K) and M. Not only are the orientations of taxadiene in the active sites of the parental P450 enzyme and its 3 mutants visibly different, but the proton abstraction lengths predicted by the model correlate well with the differences observed in the relative proportion of the monooxygenated taxadiene derivatives produced by each enzyme. To a degree of approximation, the abstraction lengths and observed product distributions correlate quite well, underscoring the previous suspicion of the limitations of traditional mutagenic (or 'structure-blind') approaches to truly identify mutants that alter the reaction selectivity of the enzyme. 98 aH 0.5 0e G 0.4 0.3 01 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 AM A A 0.10~ Parental V374L K131R S302A Distance of proton to oxyfei oxygen (A) 4.6 4.6 5.6 3-position 13a-position 20-position 4.7 5.0 5.6 4.5 4.5 5.6 4.8 5.3 5.4 Difference In bindingaffinities of taxadiene to activated and oxyferyl states of the enzyme (kcallmol) 2 % change In the production of taxadien-6a-ol compared to parental enzyme % change In the total production of oxygenated eIcosanolds to compared to parental enzyme 0.85 0.8 0.6 24.4 -23.4 -53.5 -11.6 13.5 1.1 Figure 5.18. Comparing mutation efficacy using the computational methodology: The computational methodology successfully predicts variations in product selectivities of the 3 mutants that were investigated. Electron densities of the average structures of the two likeliest poses predicted by the model (represented as dot models) exhibit visible differences between the 4 enzymes. 5. 4. Conclusions & perspectives 5. 4. 1. Comparing the methodologies Phylogeny-guided and site-directed mutageneses are efficient methodologies to improve the throughput of the enzyme. However, the selectivity improvements that are achieved through the use of these techniques often result from destabilizing binding of competing substrates rather than 99 improving the selectivity of the catalytic mechanism. In the case of promiscuous and notoriously non-selective nodal enzymes such as taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase, the benefit of being able to rapidly probe enzyme reactivity using phylogeny-guided mutagenesis is soon lost over the inability of the methodology to identify desirable amino acid substitutions without having to construct an exhaustive collective of enzyme mutants. In comparison, the computational methodology we have prescribed in Chapter 4 can conclusively identify the mechanistic basis for non-selectivity. It is robust, generalizable and manifold more rapid than other structure-guided enzyme engineering approaches. Not only can the insights that it provides be applied to chart the reactive topography of the active site and identify the impact of individual structural features on stability, activity and selectivity, one can even possibly extend the methodology to prescribe mutational targets within the active site. For this to occur, though, NMR characterization of all interacting substrates and their oxidation products is required. The algorithms utilized in the methodology can then multiplicatively compare the binding affinities and orientations of all characterized substrates within the active site to guide the construction of mutants that favor only specific orientations of desired substrates (Figure 5. 19). 5. 4. 2. The possibility of multiple substrates ina single active site Formulation of the computational methodology assumes that only a single taxadiene substrate docks into the active site of taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase. While this assumption is well-grounded in literature, 100 questions still remain as this enzyme is somewhat of a novelty compared to some of the P450 monooxygenases studied in literature. EE SA - P1 + PA2 + PAa so - PS1 + PE2 Desired product Step 1: NMR characterization of PA1, L P PB 1 & PB2 Step 2: Dock PA1, PA2, PAa, P9 i &PB2 inE sites Step 3: Informed mutation of E Step 4: Dock PA1, PA2, PAa, P9 1 & P82 inbinding sites of mutant Step 5: Assessment of pose coordinates & binding affinities Figure 5.19. A generalized algorithm for in silico enzyme engineering The diffusion of two molar equivalents of taxadiene into the active site of the enzyme, if it were to occur, would not be constrained by space as the active site of taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase is roughly 474 A' (Table 4.1.). Evaluation of this hypothesis necessitates isolation and purification of taxadiene 5ax-hydroxylase, followed by an in vitro assessment of the spectral shift that is induced by substrate binding. Comparing the spectral shift to P450 standards known to bind to single or multiple substrate molecules simultaneously would provide the much-needed constraint that is required to include or eliminate the possibility of multiple substrates binding simultaneously within the active site. As the computational methodology can account for the simultaneous binding of several substrates within the active site, this constraint could improve the predictions of the model. 101 5. 4. 3. Directed evolution versus in silicomodeling Given that most biological experimentation still proceeds with a 'black box' mentality and each assumption that one makes in the formulation of a utilizable model diminishes the closeness of fit of the model with the phenomenon it describes, there is no argument that directed evolution is the superior of the two approaches. However, the absence of a screen that can efficiently couple the selectivity of the enzyme to gene expression or platforms such as phage-display or the yeast twocomponent bait-prey system preclude the use of directed evolution 2 1 . The most realistic demonstration of directed evolution of a selective taxane P450 hydroxylase would utilize phagedisplay to assess the reactivity of the enzyme in vitro (and possibly high-throughput) using taxanebinding antibodies. Paclitaxel-binding antibodies are presently available commercially and generating antibodies capable of binding to the hydroxylated products of taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase is not a farfetched goal. 5. 4. 4. Implications for metabolic engineering Consider a metabolic pathway comprising of 3 enzymes - A, B and C. Each enzyme catalyzes a substitution at a unique position on a chemical scaffold. If only enzymes A and C of the pathway are expressed in the microbial host to produce a unique, di-substituted product, it is vital that enzyme C be suitably re-engineered in order to ensure that it exhibits the same specificity and activity towards the mono-substituted substrate as it does towards the di-substituted substrate in the unabridged 102 pathway, failing which, conversion and throughput of the pathway will be low. If the enzymes are promiscuous, as is the case for the early taxane pathway, many more copies of a suitably reengineered enzyme A would have to be expressed relative to the re-engineered enzyme C to minimize flux dissipation away from the pathway of interest. One can also maximize conversion to the product of interest by temporally inducing the expression of the respective enzymes viz. induce expression of enzyme A to produce the preferred intermediate and only induce the expression of C after sufficient time has been allowed for enzyme A to act. The permutations are numerous and serve to underscore the mutual dependence of enzyme engineering and metabolic engineering for the heterologous production of secondary plant metabolites and molecules that are variations of a new chemical theme. 103 Chapter 6 TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF MICROBIAL PACLITAXEL One of the principal criticisms leveled at microbial metabolic engineering is the seeming inability of simple microbial hosts such as E. coli to support the elaborate enzymatic machinery that is required to synthesize molecules as complex as paclitaxel. However, as demonstrated in Chapter 5, E. coli is more than able to accommodate the expression of plant secondary metabolic enzymes. An E coli strain expressing a mutant of the cytochrome P450 monooxygenase-reductase complex described earlier produced nearly 0.45 g/L of mono- and dioxygenated taxanes in 2 mL batch cultures, which, as shall be demonstrated herein, could be sufficient to ensure cost-competitive production of paclitaxel using the microorganism. Instead, the biggest hurdle in realizing the production of (1,2ct,5ct,7p,10p)-5-acetyloxy-1,2,7,10tetrahydroxy-tax-4, 11 -diene, which, in Chapter 4, was identified as a promising 'gateway' molecule for synthesis of paclitaxel and its taxane analogues, is the notorious promiscuity and poor selectivity of the pathway enzymes. Remedying these traits to minimize flux dissipation away from the molecule of interest is arguably the biggest challenge facing microbial metabolic engineering and protein engineering. 105 Presently, we do not possess a methodology that permits directed evolution of plant secondary metabolic enzymes and rational techniques for enzyme engineering such as the methodology presented in Chapter 5 are far from maturity. Nevertheless, using a technoeconomic comparison between the existing plant-based semi-synthetic process and the one that has been proposed in Figure 4.9, we identify target titers and productivities for a strain expression an optimal combination of P450 monooxygenases and acyltransferases. The titers calculated herein serve as benchmarks for future protein and metabolic engineering activities. 6. 1. Background & assumptions Paclitaxel is currently produced via a 4-step synthetic scheme from 10-DAB that has been extracted from plant cell cultures of T. baccata (Figure 6.1). The 10-DAB yield is roughly 160 mg/g DCW12 ' 123 and the paclitaxel yield from 10-DAB is 44.7%11, which translates to an overall semi-synthetic yield (assuming a plant water content of 80 wt.%) of 2.25 wt.%. This figure represents a >200-fold increase over the paclitaxel content in the bark needles of T. baccata, underscoring the importance of semi-synthesis in the production of therapeutic natural products that are otherwise too miniscule to be directly extracted from their native hosts. In comparison, production of (1,2a,5a,7p,1OP)-5-acetyloxy-1,2,7,10-tetrahydroxy-tax-4,11-diene (for simplicity, hereinafter this molecule will be abbreviated as ATHTAX) by the previously described taxadiene-producing E coli strain necessitates the expression of 6 additional enzymes (5 106 cytochrome P450 monooxygenase-reductase complexes and a single acetyltransferase), all of whose identities are already established' 4 . Significantly, the use of chemically-inducible promoters for the expression of the taxane biosynthetic apparatus couples production with growth, thereby enabling continuous chemical synthesis through continuous cultivation. 0 AcO 0 0 Ib NH NH2 NH __ HO 0 ACO d NH 0 OTES 0 ef N. O~ HO HO 0OH QOTES H ~~OL~oHo H 0 OOTES .H _H HO H- 0 OV O 10-Deacetylbaccatin III 0 OTES +OTES 0 He/7 , + OH H - OH 001O 0 OTES H0 0>~t e N H 0 OTES H H N H INHO Paclitaxel Figure 6.1. Semi-synthesis of paclitaxel from plant-derived 10-deacetylbaccatin III (10-DAB): The yield of paclitaxel from 10-DAB is 44.7%. Key: a.CH 2C 2 (yield 99%); b. Et 3N, 2-acetoxyacetyl chloride, CH 2 Cl 2 (65%); c. (NH 4 )2 Ce(NO 3 )6 , CH 3CN (80%); d. MeOH, Na 2 CO 3 (82%); e. TESCl, pyridine (89%); f 4-DMAP, Et 3N, benzoyl chloride, CH 2Cl 2 (82%); g. TESC, pyridine (85%); h. CH 3 COCl, pyridine (85%); i. NaH, THF (68%);j. 32% HC1, MeOH (90%) 107 The global paclitaxel supply chain is populated by little over a dozen API producers who supply the bulk drug to numerous formulators such as BMS or Mylan that then produce finished doses of the drug for distribution to various consumer channels. The API manufacturers either produce 10-DAB internally or source the material from external providers and typically produce 50-100 kg of paclitaxel annually 2 . Accordingly, in the economic assessment that follows, the annual production volume for the manufacturing facility is also assumed to be 100 kg. As bulk chemical prices for many of the reagents, catalysts and solvents that are required by the two semi-synthetic schemes are not readily available, SciFinder Scholar was queried to identify the lowest price for all raw materials (Tables 6.1 & 6.2). The price of ATHTAX was estimated by comparing the economics of plant and microbial cultivation. The optical density of the taxadiene producing E coli cultures reaches a peak of -40 in 5-day, 1 L fed-batch cultures. Assuming an equivalency between an optical density of 1.0 and a dry biomass titer of 0.3 g/L, the overall yield of taxadiene on a dry cell weight basis is estimated to be 0.0925 g/g. A 30% reduction in pathway flux was factored for every additional enzyme that is expressed within the pathway, which translates to a dry basis yield of 0.016 g/g for ATHTAX. The doubling time of the engineered E. coli strains is estimated to be about 12 hours, which is nearly 12-fold lower than the doubling time of T. baccata suspension cultures. 6. 2. Comparing the economics of the two competing approaches Despite having a dry basis yield that is 10 times lower than that of 10-DAB, microbial production of ATHTAX is nearly 275-fold more productive than the plant cultures that produce 10-DAB. 108 Another important distinction between the two cultures is that the E. coli strains utilize glycerol as the principal carbon source whereas the plant cells are cultivated using a combination of sucrose, glucose and fructose as carbohydrate feedstocks. Although consumption of glycerol by the E. coli cultures is estimated to be roughly 4 times greater than the mono- and disaccharide demand by the suspension cultures of T. baccata, the media formulation costs for plant cell cultivation are greater owing to the higher unit price of the sugars as well as higher nutrition supplementation costs. Consequently, the productivity of the microbial cultures is conservatively estimated to be 300-fold greater than that of the plant suspension cultures, which amounts to each kg of ATHTAX costing about $36,600. The raw material costs for synthesizing paclitaxel from 10-DAB are, therefore, a little over 6% greater than the competing semi-synthetic process that commences from ATHTAX. Table 6.1. Raw material costs for reaction scheme in Figure 6.1 Total cost Unit cost Chemical Amount Benzaldehyde 66 kg $12/kg $818 Anisidine 77 kg $32/kg $2423 10548 L $8/L $84553 Triethylamine 265 kg $15/kg $3975 2-Acetoxyacetylchloride 126 kg $1950/kg $244725 Cerium ammonium nitrate 657 kg $95/kg $62429 Acetonitrile 3560 L $16/L $56960 13455 L $7/L $89747 3 kg $2/kg $7 832 kg $440/kg $366282 19489 L $30/L $578835 3 kg $88/kg $251 44 kg $13/kg Dichloromethane Methanol Sodium carbonate Triethylsilylchloride Pyridine 4-Dimethylaminopyridine Benzoylchloride $578 6 143 kg $10.98 x 10 /kg $1.56 x 109 Acetyl chloride 87 kg $47/kg $4064 Sodium hydride 13 kg $101/kg $1266 Tetrahydrofuran 2683 L $10/kg $27903 50 L $1/L $73 10-Deacetylbaccatin III 32% Hydrochloric acid Total raw material costs = $15.7 x 106/kg 109 The capital costs of the two processes can be related using the six-tenths power law as follows 6 V Cp : (6.1) M CM 12 6 Cp and Cm are the capital costs for the plant (P) and microbial (M) processes, respectively. VP and VM are the total material flows associated with the two processes. Table 6.2. Raw material costs for reaction scheme in Figure 4.9. Chemical Amount Unit cost Total cost Benzaldehyde 66 kg $12/kg $815 76 kg 1020451 L $32/kg $2416 $8/L $8179934 Triethylamine 264 kg $15/kg $3963 2-Acetoxyacetylchloride 125 kg $1950/kg $244335 Cerium ammonium nitrate 656 kg $95/kg $62341 37500 L $16/L $600000 338329 L $7/L $2256656 3 kg $2/kg $7 Triethylsilylchloride 15023 kg $440/kg $6610208 Pyridine 4-Dimethylaminopyridine 398154 L 3065 kg $30/L $88/kg $11825163 44 kg $13/kg $579 2431 kg $36,660/kg $89.12 x 106 25064 kg $75/kg $1879800 249 kg $101/kg $25124 205438 L $5/L $1022054 Periodic acid 1012 kg $238/kg $240737 Pyridinium chlorochromate 4287 kg $250/kg Anisidine Dichloromethane Acetonitrile Methanol Sodium carbonate Benzoylchloride (1,2a,5a,7p,100)-5-acetyloxy1,2,7,1 0-tetrahydroxy-tax-4, 11 -diene Carbonyldiimidazole Sodium hydride Dimethylformamide $269746 257258 L $28/L $1071650 $7095176 Potassium hydroxide 1873 kg $6/kg $11236 Quinuclidine 1057 kg $64000/kg $67616000 N-Methylmorpholine-N-oxide 1675 kg $75/kg $125633 2222783 L $8/L $17782262 12249 kg $276/kg $3380818 606 kg $65000/kg $39364000 3879647 L $10/L $40348329 423 kg $47/kg $19682 Dioxane t-Butyl alcohol Sodium borohydride Osmium tetroxide Tetrahydrofuran Acetyl chloride 110 2356 kg $40/kg $94249 1723 kg $7/kg $12408 1892373 L $148/L $280071204 13975 kg 17520 kg $35/kg $489118 $20/kg $345492 Phenyllithium 324 kg $2272/kg $735219 Acetic acid 925 kg $4/kg $3513 3606 L 7641 kg $6/L $22300 $120/kg $916944 54504 kg $15948/kg $869223413 2940 kg $6/kg $18816 298530 L $51/L $15174280 50 L $1/L $73 Mesyl chloride Potassium carbonate Hexamethylphosphoramide N,N-Diisopropylethylamine Acetic anhydride Cyclohexane Potassium tert butoxide Benzeneseleninic acid anhydride Sodium acetate Benzene 32% Hydrochloric acid Total raw material costs = $14.7 x 106 /kg The E-factor for the semi-synthesis of paclitaxel from 10-DAB - defined as the ratio of the mass of the product to the mass of all raw materials (both in kg) - is approximately 200-fold greater than the microbial semi-synthetic process, implying that the ratio of VM to VP is 200. As a consequence, the capital costs for the microbial process are 24 times greater. Additionally, capital costs for processes handling material flows in the range of 50,000 kg/yr are roughly $40 million. Capital depreciation (D) over the lifetime of the manufacturing facility can be related by: k D = S.N (3.2) where S is the annual output of the manufacturing plant (100 kg) and N is the lifetime of the project (10 years). Accordingly, capital depreciation costs for the botanical process too are 24-fold lower. Operation of the 3 GMP-compliant steps that are common to both processes is assumed to be supervised by 1 personnel each, and 2 personnel oversee operation of the fermenter. As both 111 manufacturing schemes implement chemistries that are close to being or already have been adapted to the flow configuration, the personnel required to monitor the remaining synthetic steps are assumed to scale according to the six-tenths power law. Consequently, the botanical and microbial processes are assumed to be operated by 10 and 14 personnel, respectively. Calculation of other fixed costs follows rules of thumb that are commonly applied by process engineers. Additionally, waste and treatment costs (W) are often a fifth of the raw material costs for small-to-medium volume chemical processes, and, bioprocessing costs are not itemized as these have already been factored into the material costs for 10-DAB and ATHTAX. Table 6.3. Total manufacturing costs for plant-based and microbial-based manufacturing schemes Itemized costs Number of operations Identities of GMP-compliant steps Number of personnel (n) Total capital investment (C) Plant Microbial 11 23 3 (f i, j) 3 (f u, v) 10 14 $40 x 106 $960 x 106 6 $15.7 X 10 /kg $14.7 X 106 /kg 10 years 10 years $40,000/kg $960,000/kg $3050/kg $2754300/kg Operating labor costs (Lo = 300,000.n) $3 x 106/yr $4.2 x 106/yr Non-operating labor costs (LN = 0.6-L) $1.8 x 106 /yr $2.52 x 106/yr $2.7 x 106 /yr- $3.78 x 106/yr Supplies (P = 0.3.L) 6 $0.9 x 10 /yr $1.26 x 106 /yr Maintenance (M = 0.02-C) $0.8 x 106 /yr $19.2 x 106 /yr Utilities (U = 0.01-C) $0.4 x 106 /yr $9.6 x 10 6 /yr Miscellaneous (Ms = 0.01-C) $0.4 x 106 /yr $9.6 x 106/yr 6 $10 x 10 /yr $50.16 x 106 /yr $1 x 106/kg $5 x 10 6/kg 16.74 x 106 /kg 23.41 x 106 /kg Raw material costs (R) Project lifetime Depreciation costs (D) Waste & treatment costs (W) Administration/overhead (0 = 0.9-L) Annual fixed costs (A = Lo + LN + 0 + P + M + U + Ms) Fixed costs (F = A / S) Total manufacturing costs (= R + D + W + F) 112 6. 3. Summary of the economic assessment The 40% difference between the unit price of paclitaxel produced using both schemes (Table 6.3) is simply an artifact of the high cost of benzeneseleninic acid anhydride, which individually accounts for 60% of the raw material cost for microbial semi-synthetic process. In fact, a 50% reduction in the price of this forbiddingly expensive reagent makes microbially semi-synthesized paclitaxel only 10% more expensive than 10-DAB-derived paclitaxel, whereas a >60% reduction makes the microbial-based process more economical than the plant-based one. Nevertheless, it appears that producing (1,2a,5a,7p,10p)-5-acetyloxy-1,2,7,10-tetrahydroxy-tax-4,11-diene at 0.0032 g/g DCW per day is not only technically feasible given the tools currently at our disposal, but is also costcompetitive with the semi-synthetic plant-based process. 6. 4. Providing unprecedented access to inaccessible chemical space Besides competing quite favorably with plant-based systems, microbial metabolic engineering offers another significant benefit, best illustrated by the example of taxadiene. Though not pharmacoactive itself, taxadiene is of interest to medicinal chemists as it is the first intermediate in the paclitaxel biosynthetic pathway that bears the unique, C2 0 taxane scaffold. Unfortunately, like many therapeutic natural products, the taxadiene content in its native host is prohibitively low. As 9 of 113 paclitaxel's 11 stereocenters are located on its scaffold, total synthesis of taxadiene involves as many as 18 transformations and has an overall yield of 0.21% (Figure 6.2)127 0 ~ O OH OH 2 TBSO OTBS OTBS TBSO 9 X O~n nE15 TBSO OTBS 5 0 OBn 11 HO OBn 12 R, = R2 = CH(Ph) R,=H, R2= Bn OBn 14 X=OH OTBS OR2 8 R1=R2=H E: 10 o E TBSO 4 R10 h 7 O OTBS 3 6 13 O)K!yH) ~ O OTBS 1 00 0 17 OH 18 19 Taxadiene X= OC(S)OPh 16 x-H Figure 6.2. Total synthesis of taxadiene: The scheme involves 18 steps and has an overall yield of 0.21%. Key: a. [1] Me 2tBuSiCl, DMF, [2] H 2 , Pd/C (yield 62%); b. [1] m-CPBA, CH 2 Cl 2 , [2] NaOMe, MeOH (77%); c. Me 2tBuSiCl, imidazole, Et 2 O (70%); d. [1] Me 2tBuSiCl, DMF, [2] DIBAH, toluene (71%); e. [1] H 2C=CMeMgBr, THF, [2] DessMartin periodinane, CH 2Cl 2 (65%);f Me 2C(SeMe) 2, n-BuLi, THF (100%); g. [1] P13, Et 3N, CH 2Cl 2 , [2] HF, MeCN, THF (64%); h. PhCH(OMe) 2, PPTS, CHC 3 (88%); i. LiAlH 4, AiCl 3 , Et 2 0, CH 2Cl 2 (100%); j. Dess-Martin periodinane, CH 2 Cl 2 (48%); k. CH 2CHMgBr, THF (100%); 1. BF 3 0Et3, toluene (28%); m. LiAIH 4, THF (100%); n. PhOCSCl, NaN(SiMe) 2, THF (100%); o. Bu3SnH, VAZO, toluene (53%); p. [1] Na/NH 3, THF, [2] Dess-Martin periodinane, CH2Cl2 (56%); q. MeMgBr, CeCl 3, THF (100%); r. MeO 2 CNSO 2 NEt 3 , toluene (60%) The biosynthesis of taxadiene (Figure 6.3), however, fares much better in comparison. As was presented earlier, taxadiene assembly in E. coli commences with the head-to-tail condensation of isopentenyl pyrophosphate with dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP, 21) to produce geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP, 22), which then condenses with IPP in situ to form farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP, 23). Yet another in situ condensation reaction follows suit and IPP combines with FPP to 114 form geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP, 24). Cyclization of GGPP via intra-chain condensation subsequently yields taxadiene (19). a Opp OPP 20 21 b 'N PP Opp 22 21 20 b app+ 'Opp PP 23 22 20 ' pp Op oPP PP 20 24 23 + 20 'N PP OPP 21 24 C S.pp 24 Figure 6.3. Biosynthesis of taxadiene: The pathway commences with the isomerization of IPP (20) by an isomerase to form DMAPP (21) (step a). Condensation between IPP with DMAPP forms GPP (22), which then re-condenses with IPP to form FPP (23) in situ. FPP further condenses with IPP to form GGPP (24). All condensation reactions occur in the active site of a single enzyme, GGPP synthase (step b). GGPP is then cyclized by taxadiene synthase to form taxadiene (19) (step c). The sequence of 3 consecutive condensation reactions involving IPP is catalyzed by the enzyme, GGPP synthase, whereas DMAPP is an isomerization product of IPP formed by the enzyme, IPP isomerase. Taxadiene formation is catalyzed by taxadiene synthase. IPP is synthesized by the nonmevalonate pathway, which commences with the condensation of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate with 115 pyruvate to yield 2-methyl-(D)-erythritol-4-phosphate (MEP). Our demonstrations of taxadiene synthesis with E. coli consuming glycerol as the primary carbon source achieved yields of 0.68% and 0.85% in 2 mL batch cultures and 1 L fed-batch fermentations, respectively5 9 . The biosynthetic atom economy is also several orders of magnitude higher than that of total synthesis. Significantly, considering that the theoretical yield of taxadiene on glycerol is 11.625% (for strains utilizing glucose as the primary carbon feedstock, the theoretical yield is 20%) and that the batch and fed-batch fermentations were yet to be optimized and the metabolism of E coli could be further manipulated to improve the flux to taxadiene, the improvement in overall yield of microbial-aided synthesis over total synthesis could be even more marked. Our group has already successfully elevated the yield of taxadiene at the 2 mL scale by as much as 50% by expressing a downstream cytochrome P450 monooxygenase-reductase complex that oxidizes taxadiene to form taxadien-5a-o 1 2 8 . 116 Chapter 7 PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER: A VISION FOR DRUG DISCOVERY In Chapter 1, we elaborated how deficiencies in combinatorial chemistry were contributing to the pharmaceutical industry's 'target-rich, lead-poor' imbalance. The decision to pursue quantity over quality, how it contributed to the decline of the industry's synthetic capabilities and how these lamentable decisions led to companies foregoing natural product space as a source of new drugs were discussed at length in Chapter 2. In the three chapters that followed, a case was made for microbial metabolic engineering as a viable platform for the discovery of natural products and some of the technical challenges stymying the field were addressed therein. In this chapter, we shall elaborate a unifying vision that could translate unprecedented numbers of small-molecule drugs to the bedside. Called 'biosynthonics', our vision for re-inventing drug discovery is driven by microbial metabolic engineering and recent developments in analytics, genome sequencing, flow chemistry, informatics, oligonucleotide synthesis and retrosynthetic analysis, as well as exponential improvements in the raw computing power that is now available for drug research. Many of its individual elements are already in place and if metabolic and enzyme engineering are able to address some of the challenges that were discussed in Chapter 5, biosynthonics could become a broad paradigm for generating focused libraries of natural product-like molecules. 117 7. 1.What isbiosynthonics? Biosynthonics comprises four principal domains - design, synthesis, exploration and integration. Design encompasses the selection of electronic features and their steric optimization onto a rigid molecular framework in order to ensure optimal binding to a specific biological target. The conceptual underpinning of this exercise is rooted in fragment-based pharmacophore modeling 29 3 1 1 and all steps are completed in silico. The rigidity of the molecular framework, or scaffold, translates to a minimization of the substituents' rotational entropy 132 . The pharmacophores so-designed are then synthesized in a microbial chassis that has been carefully constructed via metabolic engineering 3 3 '3 5 . This activity constitutes the second domain of biosynthonics - synthesis. Although secondary metabolic enzyme homologues usually combine metabolic building blocks via a common reaction mechanism, they often differ from one another in their preferences for substrates. Even homologues combining the same building blocks frequently yield products that are stereo- and regiochemically unique. The third domain of biosynthonics - exploration - expands the biosynthetic ensemble for metabolic engineering through a systematic search of Nature's metabolic landscape 3' 136, 137. Another important consideration in pharmacophore design is its potential use as an input for conventional target-oriented synthesis (TOS)102, an exercise that aims to access precise regions of chemical space - either a single molecule or a small assortment of molecules exhibiting minor variations on a chemical theme. Accordingly, the fourth principal activity of biosynthonics 118 integration - is a modern, biosynthetic take on retrosynthesis and targets the synthesis of an advanced intermediate that can act as a gateway molecule for TOS via the expression of a vastly smaller set of enzymes takes advantage of the core competencies of both metabolic engineering and synthetic chemistry. 7. 2. The informed design of superior pharmacophores Lead selection by forward chemical genetics generally involves high-throughput screening of a combinatorial library comprising of >106 compounds, and, compounds that are typically selected for lead optimization exhibit Ka values of <1 gM. Fragment-based pharmacophore design (Figure 7.1.), in comparison, commences by screening only a few thousand compounds for Ka values that fall in high pM to mM range138 . High-throughput 2-D isotope-edited NMR is commonly utilized to screen the compounds", and, the interactions of their molecular appendages - or fragments - with residues within the target's binding pocket are then characterized using X-ray crystallography. Several fragments are then incorporated within a single molecular entity. The amalgamation of multiple fragments is rationalized by the additive effect that their individual interactions have on the binding affinity of the chimeric molecule, and, the likelihood of generating a hit from a compound library synthesized using fragment-based approaches is s3 orders of magnitude higher than it is for high-throughput screening of combinatorial libraries. 119 B A HN H2 NH " H2 N H2N N 1 2 3 26% at 1 mM (SPR) IC. - 130 pM (FRET aay) LE - 0.28 ICN w 0.08 pM (FRET aay) LE = 0.37 LE < 0.37 Figure 7.1. Fragment-based pharmacophore discovery: Inhibition of p-secretase has been shown to be an effective strategy for treating Alzheimer's disease. Species 1 was identified by 1-D NMR screening of a fragment library. Its binding affinity was determined by surface plasmon resonance (SPR)"0. X-ray crystallography was then utilized to 1 unearth insights regarding the structural features of 1 that interact with the binding site of p-secretase" , which led to the synthesis of species 2. The use of pharmacophore and structure-based drug design approaches was then implemented to derive species 312 The design methodology (Figure 7.2) we envision builds upon fragment-based pharmacophore discovery and commences with comparative modeling of the putative target14. However, as only a third of all protein sequences can be accurately modeled in silico144 , high-throughput X-ray crystallography is used either to determine the structures of targets comprising of unknown or poorly characterized folds145 , or, in conjunction with NMR, electron microscopy and X-ray scattering, supply restraints that can aid model generation". The target itself is discovered and validated using omics-based or clinical approaches14 , or, more recently, by metabolic control analysis 48 '149. Omics technologies, in particular, rapidly generate vast 120 amounts of relevant data that can be compiled into systems-wide models for simulations to prioritize targets, accelerate hypothesis generation and testing in disease models, and design clinical trials 20. A ~~ omic. lncreeena set B arehnologies * In targe iecovey 0a02....0 V (bdo)eynetse Oncethetopology of thebining eshas beencharectered, vlUM end t4MR-sed s-nig identllen I silca scaffold screeningand -fragments C 106am suit D I =j Figure 7.2. Overview of the biosynthonics paradigm: The proposed design methodology builds upon fragment-based drug discovery. The application of cheminformatics features prominently, and, casting the steric and electronic effects of the fragments as a three-dimensional free energy relationship for informed screening of a scaffold database by minimizing the cost function is a unique addition to the approach. Panel A highlights the workflow for the entire methodology. Panel B describes how omics-derived targets are analyzed to identify optimally binding fragments (also Panel C) whose three-dimensional positioning within the active site guide scaffold design (also Panel D). Once the topographies of the target's binding pockets have been charted, fragments that might interact with residues in the binding pockets are screened virtually using approaches such as similarity searching 4 2 . The catalogue of in silico fragment 'hits' is subsequently refined using high121 throughput 2-D NMR, and interactions between the fragments and residues in the binding pocket are validated using high-throughput X-ray crystallography. 7. 3. Cheminformatics: An integral part of pharmacophore design Though an improvement over compounds generated using combinatorial chemistry, synthetic molecules that incorporate multiple fragments still possess rotational degrees of freedom that have detrimental entropic consequences for binding. Instead, pharmacophores consisting of fragments whose coordinates within the binding site have been greatly restricted by steric effects induced by stereo- and regiospecifically linking them to privileged, natural product-like scaffolds are more likely to interact strongly and selectively with the target. Accordingly, the next phase of pharmacophore design involves mining natural product-like scaffolds that meet the spatial constraints of the interacting fragments. The steric and electronic effects of the fragments are cast as a threedimensional free energy relationship" 0 ' 15, following which, a scaffold database" is screened for candidates that minimize the cost function. A database similar to the National Cancer Institute's ChemBank" 3 would have to be created for natural products. Estimates suggest that such a database could contain in excess of 170,000 entries". Software that allows virtual screening of the structural database and analysis of the scaffolds will also be needed" 4 . As the pharmacophores are intended to be gateway molecules for TOS, integration of computer-aided synthetic planning"'' 56 into the screening software is desired. Additionally, the 122 software package would also include National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database search and analyses capabilities that append the cheminformatics output with information about the biosynthesis of the molecule. For instance, paclitaxel and epothilone B, a 16-membered macrolide produced by the myxobacteria, Sorangium cellulosum157 , arrest the cancerous cell cycle in its metaphase by inhibiting tubulin depolymerization. Both molecules also share a common binding 58 pocket, albeit they interact quite differently therein' . Pharmacophore design for the discovery of more potent and safer tubulin-binding drugs according to the methodology outlined herein would, therefore, yield structures based on the scaffolds of both paclitaxel and epothilone B (Figure 7.3). However, based on an assessment of the biosynthetic information that is presently available for both molecules 83' 159 and assuming that the TOS schemes do not exhibit significant differences in their coverage of local chemical space, one is more likely to select the pharmacophore based on the epothilone scaffold. Gateway molecules, thus, can be identified through synthetic and biosynthetic analyses involving candidates that have been objectively screened from a natural product database. O 1H H HH HOH NN 4 Paclitaxel 5 Epothllone B Figure 7.3. Two scaffolds, one binding site: Structural elements of paclitaxel and epothilone B that share a common interaction site within the binding pocket have been highlighted with the same color. 123 It is evident that cheminformatics is central to the success of the biosynthonics drug discovery platform. Individual software elements already exist but a single program in the mold of Accelrys, Inc.'s Discovery Studio, that accesses databases of the kind described previously and supports rigorous scientific analysis of the retrieved data as discussed does not exist. The development of such tools could not be more urgent. Once available, they could transform drug discovery. 7. 4. Mining the natural world Information about biosynthetic gene sequences encoding individual assembly steps and structural characterization of the intermediates and products that various enzyme combinations produce is crucial to the success of the biosynthonics platform. To this end, high-throughput whole genome sequencing, assembly and bioinformatics analysis will greatly expand the biosynthetic ensemble that is available for metabolic engineering136'137, 160,161. The vast majority of recently uncovered bacterial terpenoids were discovered through genome mining. Warp Drive Bio, a biotechnology start-up in Cambridge, MA has adopted a similar approach for discovering new drug candidates by leveraging its competencies in whole genome sequencing, assembly, mining and gene synthesis to produce natural products for Sanofi Aventis' drug discovery programs 2 . Additionally, NMR-based comparative metabolomics should aid rapid molecular characterization, and, the development of in silico tools and methodologies for correlating the sequence and domain 124 63 69 organization of PKSs will accelerate annotation of more orphan PKS -' . Predictive capabilities for characterizing novel terpenoid biosynthetic enzymes would also have to expanded8 6'170. 7. 5. Continuous manufacturing as a tool for discovery It has been proposed that continuous manufacturing could potentially benefit drug discovery by allowing investigations of reaction conditions, scale-up from gram-scales to ton-scales to meet material requirements for clinical trials, evaluation of supply chain constraints, and rapid transfer of the technology to production 1 7 1. Click chemistry", DNA-templated organic synthesis17 2 and a very recent, multidimensional experimentation technique to evaluate reactions catalyzed by transition metal complexes17 3 offer improved and high-throughput prospection of chemical space. However, none of these techniques can consistently generate molecular architectures capable of rivaling the complexity of natural products. Among other platforms, automated synthesizers have lately gained acceptance as robust tools for natural product syntheses0 4 . However, as these units predominantly utilize batch chemistries to synthesize target molecules, their integration with continuous manufacturing faces many technical challenges. Microreactors, on the other hand, appear to be much more promising. Linearly-linked flow reactors have been successfully used for the multistep syntheses of the cytotoxic alkaloid, (±)- oxomaritidine174 , as well as a small library of piperazines targeting a novel chemokine receptor linked to several inflammations and allergies175 . In the case of (±)-oxomaritidine, synthesis was achieved 125 using packed columns containing immobilized reagents, catalysts and scavengers. The [5+2] cycloaddition of quinone monoketals and styrene derivatives to produce the bicyclo[3.2.1]octanoid scaffolds of neolignan natural products has also been demonstrated in flow. Yet, these successes are but a few examples of the microreactor-facilitated traversal of natural product space1 7 6 . Adapting batch chemistries to the flow format is fairly protracted and technically challenging, thereby rendering the design of chemical processes involving six to eight synthetic steps - as is often the case for small-molecule drugs - impractical for drug discovery. 7. 6. Metabolic engineering _ The ultimate demonstration of continuous manufacturing Microbial synthesis of natural products intensifies and replaces an otherwise complicated synthetic scheme comprising of scaffold assembly and multiple functional group transformations with a single unit operation wherein a carbohydrate feedstock is converted to the product of interest under considerably milder operating conditions by a microbial host (Figure 7.4). Moreover, it is unlikely that the microbial-aided synthesis of APIs and pharmaceutical intermediates will face many of the challenges that flow synthetic schemes encounter during work-up. As the routine use of perfusion bioreactors by biopharmaceutical companies to manufacture protein products that rapidly degrade in the culture broth would suggest, continuous biomanufacturing and cultivation are well-established industrial unit operations177' 178. This versatility makes it an important value addition to drug discovery. Also, whereas isolation of the API and its synthetic intermediates typically incur considerable material and energy costs in traditional, batch-based manufacturing, microbial 126 production of an API entirely does away with the need to isolate synthetic intermediates, greatly shrinking the footprint of the manufacturing facility. For an industry that typically generates between 25 to 100 kg of waste for every kg of product it manufactures, adoption of metabolic engineering for chemical synthesis promises quantum leaps in atom and energy economies 1 79. The API itself can be extracted from the culture broth through use of continuous countercurrent chromatography17 8, followed by purification and crystallization to produce the bulk API. Solvent R1 S, R2 S2 RN3 3-+ -+N-3 -- 2 1 W RN-2 SN3 [4 - SN2 N-2 N -- W-N-1 s WN 1W WN2 WN- W2 Crystallizer RN Bulk API RN- 1 2 E2 3- -+N-3- RN R2 EN3 N-2 EN- Dryer EN N-i N Solvent Solvent Crystallizer N Carbohydrate feedstock Chromatography Fermenter 1 Waste LLE Bulk API Waste Dryer Figure 7.4. Metabolic engineering, the ultimate demonstration of reaction intensification: E and G denote a biosynthetic enzyme and gene, respectively. R represents the reactant, S denotes the solvent and W represents the waste stream emerging from the unit operation. 127 7. 7. Final words Any technology is only as good as its weakest link and much remains to be done before biosynthonics crystallizes into a viable drug discovery platform. However, many of its elements are already in place. Future advances and the convergence of analytical biochemistry, bioinformatics, computation, flow chemistry and metabolic & protein engineering will drive this revolution in drug discovery. One sincerely hopes this is the case. After all, the price of the status quo for discovering and developing a drug has already exceeded a billion dollars180 . 128 Chapter References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. in The Economist, Vol. 385(8552) 88London; 27 October 2007). Booth, B. & Zemmel, R. Prospects for productivity. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 3, 451456 (2004). Clark, D.E. & Newton, C.G. Outsourcing lead optimization: The quiet revolution. Drug Discovery Today 9, 492-500 (2004). Sinha, G. Outsourcing drug work. Scientfic American 291, 24-25 (2004). Scott, A. Pharma outsourcing to exceed $26 billion by 2011. Chemical Week 168, 27 (2006). Ferraindiz, J.M. The impact of generic goods in the pharmaceutical industry. Health Economics 8, 599-612 (1999). Finkelstein, S. & Temin, P. Reasonable Rx: Solving the Drug Price Crisis. (Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River; 2008). Last accessed: February 6, 2011). Lombardino, J.G. & Lowe, J.A. The role of the medicinal chemist in drug discovery - Then and now. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 853, 853-862 (2004). Rang, H.P. Drug Discovery & Development: Technology in Transition. (Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh; 2006). Lipinski, C.A. Lead- and drug-like compounds: The rule-of-five revolution. Drug Discovery Today: Technologies 1, 337-341 (2004). Hogan, J.C. Combinatorial chemistry in drug discovery. Nature Biotechnology 15, 328 - 330 (1997). Ramstram, 0. & Lehn, J.-M. Drug discovery by dynamic combinatorial libraries. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 1, 26-36 (2002). Geysen, H.M., Schoenen, F., Wagner, D. & Wagner, R. A guide to drug discovery: Combinatorial compound libraries for drug discovery: an ongoing challenge. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2, 222-230 (2003). Kolb, H.C. & Sharpless, K.B. The growing impact of click chemistry on drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today 8, 1129-1137 (2003). Schreiber, S.L. Target-oriented and diversity-oriented organic synthesis in drug discovery. Science 287, 1964-1969 (2000). Bleicher, K.H., Bohm, H.J., Muller, K. & Alanine, A.I. Hit and lead generation: beyond high-throughput screening. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2, 369-378 (2003). Rauwerda, H., Roos, M., Hertzberger, B.O. & Breit, T.M. The promise of a virtual lab in drug discovery. DrugDiscovery Today 11, 228-236 (2006). Wu, X. & Schultz, P.G. Synthesis at the interface of chemistry and biology. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 12497-12515 (2009). Butcher, E.C., Berg, E.L. & Kunkel, E.J. Systems biology in drug discovery. Nature Biotechnology 22, 1253-1259 (2004). 129 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. Cooper, M.A. Optical biosensors in drug discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 1, 515528 (2002). Dittrich, P.S. & Manz, A. Lab-on-a-chip: microfluidics in drug discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 5, 210-218 (2006). Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America Pharmaceutical Industry Profile 2012. (PhRMA, Washington, DC; 2012). Mullard, A. 2011 FDA drug approvals. Nature Reviews DrugDiscovery 11, 91-94 (2012). Pammolli, F., Magazzini, L. & Riccaboni, M. The productivity crisis in pharmaceutical R&D. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 10, 428-438 (2011). Kola, I. & Landis, J. Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 3, 711-715 (2004). Overington, J.P., Al-Lazikani, B. & Hopkins, A.L. How many drug targets are there? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 5, 993-996 (2006). Pang, Y.P. In silico drug discovery: Solving the 'target-rich' and 'lead-poor' imbalance using the genome-to-drug-lead paradigm. ClinicalPharmacolog & Therapeutics81, 30-34 (2007). Feher, M. & Schmidt, J.M. Property distributions: Differences between drugs, natural products, and molecules from combinatorial chemistry. Journalof Chemical Information and Modeling 43, 218-227 (2003). Paolini, G.V., Shapland, R.H.B., van Hoorn, W.P., Mason, J.S. & Hopkins, A.L. Global mapping of pharmacological space. Nature Biotechnology 24, 805-815 (2006). Oprea, T.I. & Gottfries, J. Chemography: The art of navigating in chemical space. Journal of CombinatorialChemistry 3, 157-166 (2001). Ashburn, T.T. & Thor, K.B. Drug repositioning: Identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 3, 673-683 (2004). DiMasi, J.A., Hansen, R.W. & Grabowski, H.G. The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. J Health Econ 22, 151-185 (2003). Adams, C.P. & Brantner, V.V. Estimating the cost of new drug development: Is it really 802 million dollars? Health Aff (Millwood)25, 420-428 (2006). Grabowski, H., Vernon, J. & DiMasi, J.A. Returns on research and development for 1990s new drug introductions. Pharmacoeconomics20, 11-29 (2002). Koehn, F. & Carter, G. The evolving role of natural products in drug discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 4, 206-220 (2005). Newman, D.J., Cragg, G.M. & Snader, K.M. The influence of natural products upon drug discovery NaturalProductReports 17, 215-234 (2000). Chang, M. & Keasling, J. Production of isoprenoid pharmaceuticals by engineered microbes. Nature Chemical Biology 2, 674 - 681 (2006). Bohlmann, J. & Keeling, C.I. Terpenoid biomaterials. PlantJ54, 656-669 (2008). Koehn, F.E. & Carter, G.T. The evolving role of natural products in drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 4, 206-220 (2005). Firn, R.D. & Jones, C.G. The evolution of secondary metabolism - a unifying model. Mol Microbiol37, 989-994 (2000). 130 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. Li, J.W. & Vederas, J.C. Drug discovery and natural products: end of an era or an endless frontier? Science 325, 161-165 (2009). Newman, D.J. & Cragg, G.M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the last 25 years. JournalofNaturalProducts 70, 461-477 (2007). Feher, M. & Schmidt, J.M. Property distributions: Differences between drugs, natural products, and molecules from combinatorial chemistry. Journalof Chemical Information and Computer Science 43, 218-227 (2003). Leeson, P.D. & Springthorpe, B. The influence of drug-like concepts on decision-making in medicinal chemistry. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 6, 881-890 (2007). Goodman, J. & Walsh, V. The Story of Taxol: Nature and Politics in the Pursuit of an AntiCancer Drug (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 2001). Nicolaou, K.C. & Montagnon, T. Molecules That Changed the World. (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim; 2008). Corey, E.J. & Cheng, X.-M. The Logic of Chemical Synthesis. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York; 1995). Gallop, M.A., Barrett, R.W., Dower, W.J., Fodor, S.P.A. & Gordon, E.M. Applications of combinatorial technologies to drug discovery. 1. Background and peptide combinatorial libraries. J Med. Chem. 37, 1233-1251 (1994). Gordon, E.M., Barrett, R.W., Dower, W.J., Fodor, S.P.A. & Gallop, M.A. Applications of combinatorial technologies to drug discovery. 2. Combinatorial organic synthesis, library screening strategies, and future directions. J.Med. Chem. 37, 1385-1401 (1994). Federsel, H.J. Logistics of process R&D: transforming laboratory methods to manufacturing scale. Nat Rev DrugDiscov 2, 654-664 (2003). Kola, I. & Landis, J. Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nat Rev Drug Discov 3, 711-715 (2004). Zhu, F., Qin, C., Tao, L., Liu, X., Shi, Z., Ma, X., Jia, J., Tan, Y., Cui, C., Lin, J., Tan, C., Jiang, Y. & Chen, Y. Clustered patterns of species origins of nature-derived drugs and clues for future bioprospecting. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the United States ofAmerica 108, 12943-12948 (2011). Brower, V. Back to Nature: Extinction of medicinal plants threatens drug discovery. Journal ofthe National CancerInstitute 100, 838-839 (2008). Ro, D.-K., Paradise, E.M., Ouellet, M., Fisher, K.J., Newman, K.L., Ndungu, J., Ho, K., Eachus, R., Ham, T., Kirby, J., Chang, M.C.Y., Withers, S., Shiba, Y., Sarpong, R. & Keasling, J.D. Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast. Nature, 940-943 (2006). Stephanopoulos, G., Alper, H. & Moxley, J. Exploiting biological complexity for strain improvement through systems biology. Nat Biotechnol22, 1261-1267 (2004). Pfeifer, B.A., Admiraal, S.J., Gramajo, H., Cane, D.E. & Khosla, C. Biosynthesis of complex polyketides in a metabolically engineered strain of E. coli. Science 291, 1790-1792 (2001). Leonard, E., Ajikumar, P.K., Thayer, K., Xiao, W.H., Mo, J.D., Tidor, B., Stephanopoulos, G. & Prather, K.L. Combining metabolic and protein engineering of a terpenoid 131 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. biosynthetic pathway for overproduction and selectivity control. Proc NatI Acad Sci U S A 107, 13654-13659 (2010). Ajikumar, P.K., Xiao, W.H., Tyo, K.E., Wang, Y., Simeon, F., Leonard, E., Mucha, 0., Phon, T.H., Pfeifer, B. & Stephanopoulos, G. Isoprenoid pathway optimization for Taxol precursor overproduction in Escherichia coli. Science 330, 70-74 (2010). Klein-Marcushamer, D., Ajikumar, P.K. & Stephanopoulos, G. Engineering microbial cell factories for biosynthesis of isoprenoid molecules: Beyond lycopene. Trends in Biotechnology, 417-424 (2007). Firn, R. Nature's Chemicals: The Natural Products that Shaped Our World. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK; 2010). Ajikumar, P.K., Tyo, K., Carlsen, S., Mucha, 0., Phon, T.H. & Stephanopoulos, G. Terpenoids: Opportunities for biosynthesis of natural product drugs using engineered microorganisms. Molecular Pharmaceutics,167-190 (2008). Bohlmann, J. & Keeling, C.I. Terpenoid biomaterials. The PlantJournal,656-669 (2008). Breitmaier, E. Terpenes. (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany; 2006). Barkovich, R. & Liao, J.C. Metabolic engineering of isoprenoids Metabolic Engineering 3, 27-39 (2001). Thulasiram, H.V., Erickson, H.K. & Poulter, C.D. Chimeras of two isoprenoid synthases catalyze all four coupling reactions in isoprenoid biosynthesis. Science 316, 73-76 (2007). Ajikumar, P.K., Tyo, K., Carlsen, S., Mucha, 0., Phon, T.H. & Stephanopoulos, G. Terpenoids: opportunities for biosynthesis of natural product drugs using engineered microorganisms. MolPharm 5, 167-190 (2008). Dugar, D. & Stephanopoulos, G. Relative potential of biosynthetic pathways for biofuels and bio-based products. Nature Biotechnology 29, 1074-1078 (2011). Kaksal, M., Jin, Y., Coates, R.M., Croteau, R. & Christianson, D.W. Taxadiene synthase structure and evolution of modular architecture in terpene biosynthesis. Nature 469, 116120 (2011). Poulter, C.D. Farnesyl diphosphate synthase: A paradigm for understanding structure and function relationships in E-polyprenyl diphosphate synthases. Phytochemistry Reviews 5, 1726 (2006). Yoshikuni, Y., Ferrin, T.E. & Keasling, J.D. Designed divergent evolution of enzyme function. Nature 440, 1078-1082 (2006). Meunier, B., de Visser, S.P. & Shaik, S. Mechanism of oxidation reactions catalyzed by cytochrome P450 enzymes. Chemical reviews 104, 3947-3980 (2004). Groves, J.T. in Cytochrome P450: Structure, Mechanism, and Biochemistry. (ed. P. Ortiz de Montellano) 1-43 (Kluwer, New York; 2005). Firn, R.D. & Jones, C.G. The evolution of secondary metabolism - A unifying model. Molecular Microbiology 37, 989-994 (2000). Yadav, V.G. & Stephanopoulos, G. Reevaluating synthesis by biology. Curr Opin Microbiol 13, 371-376 (2010). 132 76. 77. Ajikumar, P.K., Xiao, W.H., Tyo, K.E., Wang, Y., Simeon, F., Leonard, E., Mucha, 0., Phon, T.H., Pfeifer, B. & Stephanopoulos, G. Isoprenoid pathway optimization for Taxol precursor overproduction in Escherichia coli. Science 330, 70-74. Fischbach, M.A. & Clardy, J. One pathway, many products. Nature Chemical Biology 3, 353-355 (2007). 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. Maplestone, R.A., Stone, M.J. & Williams, D.H. The evolutionary role of secondary metabolites - A review. Gene 115, 151-157 (1992). Dixon, R.A. Natural products and plant disease resistance. Nature 411, 843-847 (2001). Gershenzon, J. & Dudareva, N. The function of terpene natural products in the natural world. Nature ChemicalBiology 3, 408-414 (2007). Janes, K.A., Albeck, J.G., Gaudet, S., Sorger, P.K., Lauffenburger, D.A. & Yaffe, M.B. A systems model of signaling identifies a molecular basis set for cytokine-induced apoptosis. Science 310, 1646-1653 (2005). Frost & Sullivan New York, NY; 2001). Walker, K. & Croteau, R. Taxol biosynthetic genes. Phytochemistry 58, 1-7 (2001). Croteau, R., Schoendorf, A. & Jennewein, S. Cytochrome P450 oxygenases and their uses. US PatentApp. 20,040/236,089 (2004). Ketchum, R.E.B. & Croteau, R.B. in Plant Metabolomics. (eds. K. Saito, R.A. Dixon & L. Willmitzer) 291-309 (Springer Verlag, Heidelberg; 2006). Jennewein, S., Wildung, M.R., Chau, M.-D., Walker, K. & Croteau, R. Random sequencing of an induced Taxus cell cDNA library for identification of clones involved in Taxol biosynthesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 9149-9154 (2004). Blum, T. & Kohlbacher, 0. Using atom mapping rules for an improved detection of relevant routes in weighted metabolic networks. Journal of Computational Biology 15, 565576 (2008). Heath, A.P., Bennett, G.N. & Kavraki, L.E. Finding metabolic pathways using atom tracking. Bioinformatics26, 1548-1555 (2010). Floss, H.G. & Mocek, U. in Taxol: Science & Applications. (ed. M. Suffness) 191-208 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL; 1995). Gasteiger, J. & Engel, T. Chemoinformatics. (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim; 2003). http://www.daylight.com/dayhtiml/doc/theory/theory.similes.htill. Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 1572-1574 (2003). Orry, A.J.W. & Abagyan, R. Homology Modeling: Methods and Protocols. (Springer, New York; 2012). 94. http://www.cgdl.ucsf.edu/chiminera/docs/ContribLtedSoftware/mlIItaligiviewer/frame 95. nav.httml. Schoendorf, A., Rithner, C.D., Williams, R.M. & Croteau, R. Molecular cloning of a cytochrome P450 taxane 10p-hydroxylase cDNA from Taxus and functional expression in 133 96. 97. 98. 99. 100. 101. 102. 103. 104. 105. 106. 107. 108. yeast. Proceedingsof the NationalAcademy ofSciences of the United States ofAmerica 98, 15011506 (2001). Eswar, N., M. A. Marti-Renom, Webb, B., Madhusudhan, M.S., Eramian, D., Shen, M., Pieper, U. & Sali, A. Comparative protein structure modeling with MODELLER. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 15, 5.6.1-5.6.30 (-2006). Yu, J., Zhou, Y., Tanaka, I. & Yao, M. Roll: A new algorithm for the detection of protein pockets and cavities with a rolling probe sphere. Bioinformatics26, 46-52 (2010). http://ekhidna.biocenter.helsinki.fi/dali server/. Mordecai, A. Nonlinear Programming: Analysis and Methods. (Dover Publications, Mineola, New York; 2003). Ghosh, D., Griswold, J., Erman, M. & Pangborn, W. Structural basis for androgen specificity and oestrogen synthesis in human aromatase. Nature 457, 219-223 (2009). Chovancovi, E., Pavelka, A., Benes, P., Strnad, 0., Brezovskf, J., Kozlikovai, B., Gora, A., Sustr, V., Klvana, M., Medek, P., Biedermannovai, L., Sochor, J. & Damborskf, J. Eva Chovancovai, Antonin Pavelka, Petr Benes, Ondrej Strnad, Jan Brezovskf, Barbora Kozlikovai, Artur Gora, Vilem 9ustr, Martin Klvana, Petr Medek, Lada Biedermannovai, Jiff Sochor & Jifi Damborskf: CAVER 3.0: A Tool for the Analysis of Transport Pathways in Dynamic Protein Structures, PLoS Computational Biology 8: e1002708,. PLoS ComputationalBiology (2012). Burke, M.D. & Schreiber, S.L. A planning strategy for diversity-oriented synthesis. Angewandte Chemie InternationalEdition 43, 46-58 (2004). Doi, T., Fuse, S., Miyamoto, S., Nakai, K., Sasuga, D. & Takahashi, T. A formal total synthesis of taxol aided by an automated synthesizer. Chemistry - An Asian Journal 1, 370383 (2006). Fuse, S., Machida, K. & Takahashi, T. in New Strategies in Chemical Synthesis and Catalysis. (ed. B. Pignataro) 33-45 (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim; 2012). Nicolaou, K.C., Nantermet, P.G., Ueno, H., Guy, R.K., Couladouros, E.A. & Sorensen, E.J. Total synthesis of taxol. 1. Retrosynthesis, degradation, and reconstitution. Journalofthe American Chemical Society 117, 624-633 (1995). Nicolaou, K.C., Liu, J.-J., Yang, Z., Ueno, H., Sorensen, E.J., Claiborne, C.F., Guy, R.K., Hwang, C.-K., Nakada, M. & Nantermet, P.G. Total synthesis of taxol. 2. Construction of A and C ring intermediates and initial attempts to construct the ABC ring system. Journalof the American Chemical Society 117, 634-644 (1995). Nicolaou, K.C., Yang, Z., Liu, J.-J., Nantermet, P.G., Claiborne, C.F., Renaud, J., Guy, R.K. & Shibayama, K. Total synthesis of taxol. 3. Formation of taxol's ABC ring skeleton. Journalofthe American Chemical Society 117, 645-652 (1995). Nicolaou, K.C., Ueno, H., Liu, J.-J., Nantermet, P.G., Yang, Z., Renaud, J., Paulvannan, K. & Chadha, R. Total synthesis of taxol. 4. The final stages and completion of the synthesis. Journalofthe American Chemical Society 117, 653-659 (1995). 134 109. Nicolaou, K.C., Yang, Z., Liu, J.J., Ueno, H., Nantermet, P.G., Guy, R.K., Claiborne, C.F., Renaud, J., Couladouros, E.A., Paulvannan, K. & Sorensen, E.J. Total synthesis of taxol. Nature 367, 630-634 (1994). 110. 111. 112. 113. 114. 115. 116. 117. 118. 119. 120. 121. 122. 123. 124. 125. Danishefsky, S.J., Masters, J.J., Young, W.B., Link, J.T., Snyder, L.B., Magee, T.V., Jung, D.K., Isaacs, R.C.A., Bornmann, W.G., Alaimo, C.A., Coburn, C.A. & M. J. Di Grandi Total synthesis of baccatin III and taxol. Journalof the American Chemical Society 118, 28432859 (1996). Kleemann, A., Engel, J., Kutscher, B. & Reichert, D. Pharmaceutical Substances: Syntheses, Patents, Applications, Vol. 1 & 2. (Georg Thieme Verlag, New York, NY; 2001). Greene, T.W. & Wuts, P.G.M., Vol. 3 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY; 1991). Kocienski, P. Protecting Groups, 3rd Ed. (Georg Thieme Verlag, New York, NY; 2005). Munro, A.W., Leys, D.G., McLean, K.J., Marshall, K.R., Ost, T.W.B., Daff, S., Miles, C.S., Chapman, S.K., Lysek, D.A., Moser, C.C., Page, C.C. & Dutton, P.L. P450 BM3: The very model of a modern flavocytochrome. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 27, 250-257 (2002). Barnes, H.J., Arlotto, M.P. & Waterman, M.R. Expression and enzymatic activity of recombinant cytochrome P450 17t-hydroxylase in Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the United States ofAmerica 88, 5597-5601 (1991). Leonard, E. & Koffas, M.A.G. Engineering of artificial plant cytochrome P450 enzymes for synthesis of isoflavones by Escherichia coli. Applied & Environmental Microbiology 73, 72467251 (2007). Zhou, K. & Stephanopoulos, G. Unpublished results. Hamdane, D., Zhang, H. & Hollenberg, P. Oxygen activation by cytochrome P450 monooxygenase. Photosynthesis Research 98, 657-666 (2008). Rontein, D., Onillona, S., Herbette, G., Werck-Reichhart, D., Sallauda, C. & Tissier, A. Oxidation of taxadiene to oxacyclotaxane by the yew CYP725A4 previously described as a taxadiene 5a-hydroxylase. JournalofBiological Chemistry 283, 6067-6075 (2008). White, C. & Stephanopoulos, G. Unpublished results. Smith, G.P. Filamentous fusion phage: Novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface. Science 228, 1315-1317 (1985). Zocher, R., Weckwerth, W., Hacker, C., Kammer, B., Hornbogen, T. & Ewald, D. Biosynthesis of taxol: Enzymatic acetylation of 10-deacetylbaccatin-III to baccatin-III in crude extracts from roots of Taxus baccata. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 229, 16-20 (1996). Zarek, M. & Wallg6rski, P. Determination of 10-deacetylbaccatine III in Taxus baccata needles by micellar electrokinetic chromatography. Herba Polonica 55, 25-35 (2009). Yadav, V.G. & Stephanopoulos, G. Elucidation of the early taxane biosynthetic pathway for biosynthesis of a gateway molecule for target-oriented chemical synthesis of paclitaxel. Submitted (2013). Wickremesinhe, E.R.M. & Arteca, R.N. Taxus cell suspension cultures: Optimizing growth and production of taxol. JournalofPlant Physiology 144, 183-188 (1994). 135 126. 127. 128. 129. 130. 131. 132. 133. 134. 135. 136. 137. 138. 139. 140. 141. 142. Anderson, J. Determining manufacturing costs. Chemical Engineering Progress 105, 27-31 (2009). Rubenstein, S.M. & Williams, R.M. Studies on the biosynthesis of taxol: Total synthesis of taxa-4(20),111( 2)-diene and taxa-4(5),111(2 )-diene. The first committed biosynthetic intermediate. Journalof Organic Chemistry 60, 7215-7223 (1995). Yadav, V.G., Edgar, S.M. & Stephanopoulos, G. Investigations into the selectivity and activity of a promiscuous Taxus P450 monooxygenase. Submitted (2013). Erlanson, D.A., McDowell, R.S. & O'Brien, T. Fragment-based drug discovery. Journalof Medicinal Chemistry 47, 3463-3482 (2004). Yang, S.-Y. Pharmacophore modeling and applications in drug discovery: Challenges and recent advances. Drug Discovery Today 15, 444-450 (2010). Rees, D.C., Congreve, M., Murray, C.W. & Carr, R. Fragment-based lead discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 3, 660-672 (2004). Murray, C.W. & Verdonk, M.L. The consequences of translational and rotational entropy lost by small molecules on binding to proteins. Journalof Computer-Aided Molecular Design 16, 741-753 (2002). Bailey, J.E. Toward a science of metabolic engineering. Science 252, 1668-1675 (1991). Stephanopoulos, G.N. Metabolic fluxes and metabolic engineering. Metabolic Engineering 1, 1-11 (1999). Keasling, J.D. Manufacturing molecules through metabolic engineering. Science 330, 13551358 (2010). Schloss, P.D. & Handelsman, J. Biotechnological prospects from metagenomics. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 14, 303-310 (2003). Cane, D.E. & Ikeda, H. Exploration and mining of the bacterial terpenome. Accounts of Chemical Research 45, 463-472 (2012). Hajduk, P.J. & Greer, J. A decade of fragment-based drug design: Strategic advances and lessons learned. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 6, 211-219 (2007). Hajduk, P.J., Gerfin, T., Boehlen, J.-M., Hiberli, M., Marek, D. & Fesik, S.W. Highthroughput nuclear magnetic resonance-based screening. JournalofMedicinal Chemistry 42, 2315-2317 (1999). Geschwindner, S., Olsson, L.L., Albert, J.S., Deinum, J., Edwards, P.D., Beer, T. & Folmer, R.H. Discovery of a novel warhead against beta-secretase through fragment-based lead generation. JournalofMedicinal Chemistry 50, 5903-5911 (2007). Murray, C.W., Callaghan, 0., Chessari, G., Cleasby, A., Congreve, M., Frederickson, M., Hartshorn, M.J., McMenamin, R., Patel, S. & Wallis, N. Application of fragment screening by X-ray crystallography to beta-secretase. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 50, 1116-1123 (2007). Edwards, P.D., Albert, J.S., Sylvester, M., Aharony, D., Andisik, D., Callaghan, 0., Campbell, J.B., Carr, R.A., Chessari, G., Congreve, M., Frederickson, M., Folmer, R.H., Geschwindner, S., Koether, G., Kolmodin, K., Krumrine, J., Mauger, R.C., Murray, C.W., Olsson, L.L., Patel, S., Spear, N. & Tian, G. Application of fragment-based lead generation 136 143. 144. 145. 146. 147. 148. 149. 150. 151. 152. 153. 154. 155. 156. to the discovery of novel, cyclic amidine beta-secretase inhibitors with nanomolar potency, cellular activity, and high ligand efficiency. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 50, 5912-5925 (2007). Cavasotto, C.N. & Phatak, S.S. Homology modeling in drug discovery: Current trends and applications. Drug Discovery Today 14, 676-683 (2009). Marti-Renom, M.A., Stuart, A., Fiser, A., Sanchez, R., Melo, F. & Sali, A. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annual Review of Biophysics & BiomolecularStructure 29, 291-326 (2000). Blundell, T.L., Jhoti, H. & Abell, C. High-throughput crystallography for lead discovery in drug design. Nature Reviews DrugDiscovery 1, 45-54 (2002). Ward, A.B., Sali, A. & Wilson, I.A. Structural biology unleashed through use of restraints. Science In press (2013). Lindsay, M.A. Target Discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2, 831-838 (2003). Cascante, M., Boros, L.G., Comin-Anduix, B., P. de Atauri, Centelles, J.J. & Lee, P.W.-N. Metabolic control analysis in drug discovery and disease. Nature Biotechnology 20, 243-249 (2002). Metallo, C.M., Gameiro, P.A., Bell, E.L., Mattaini, K.R., Yang, J., Hiller, K., Jewell, C.M., Johnson, Z.R., Irvine, D.J., Guarente, L., Kelleher, J.K., M. G. Vander Heiden, Iliopoulos, 0. & Stephanopoulos, G. Reductive glutamine metabolism by IDHI mediates lipogenesis under hypoxia. Nature481, 380-384 (2012). Harper, K.C. & Sigman, M.S. Three-Dimensional Correlation of Steric and Electronic Free Energy Relationships Guides Asymmetric Propargylation. Science 333, 1875-1878 (2011). Harper, K.C., Bess, E.N. & Sigman, M.S. Multidimensional steric parameters in the analysis of asymmetric catalytic reactions. Nature Chemistry 4, 366-374 (2012). Welsch, M.E., Snyder, S.A. & Stockwell, B.R. Privileged scaffolds for library design and drug discovery. CurrentOpinion in Chemical Biology 14, 1-15 (2010). Strausberg, R.L. & Schreiber, S.L. From knowing to controlling: A path from genomics to drugs using small molecule probes. Science 300, 294-295 (2003). Wetzel, S., Klein, K., Renner, S., Rauh, D., Oprea, T.I., Mutzel, P. & Waldmann, H. Interactive exploration of chemical space with Scaffold Hunter. Nature Chemical Biology 5, 581-583 (2009). Cook, A., Johnson, A.P., Law, J., Mirzazadeh, M., Ravitz, 0. & Simon, A. Computer-aided synthesis design: 40 years on. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science 2, 79-107 (2012). Ravitz, 0. Data-driven computer aided synthesis design. Drug Discovery Today: Technologies In press (2013). 157. H6fle, G., Bedorf, N., Steinmetz, H., Schomburg, D., Gerth, K. & Reichenbach, H. Epothilone A and B - Novel 16-membered macrolides with cytotoxic activity: Isolation, crystal structure, and conformation in solution. Angewandte Chemie InternationalEdition 35, 1567-1569 (1996). 137 158. 159. 160. 161. 162. 163. 164. 165. Giannakakou, P., Gussio, R., Nogales, E., Downing, K.H., Zaharevitz, D., Bollubuck, B., Poy, G., Sackett, D., Nicolaou, K.C. & Fojo, T. A common pharmacophore for epothilone and taxanes: Molecular basis for drug resistance conferred by tubulin mutations in human cancer cells. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the United States ofAmerica 97, 2904 (2000). Tang, L., Shah, S., Chung, L., Carney, J., Katz, L., Khosla, C. & Julien, B. Cloning and heterologous expression of the epothilone gene cluster. Science 287, 640-642 (2000). Baker, M. De novo genome assembly: What every biologist should know. Nature Methods 9, 333-337 (2012). Kircher, M. & Kelso, J. High-throughput DNA sequencing - Concepts and limitations. BioEssays 32, 524-536 (2010). Waldholz, M. Biology's master programmers. MIT Technolog Review July/August, 56-60 (2012). Forseth, R.R. & Schroeder, F.C. NMR-spectroscopic analysis of mixtures: From structure to function. Current Opinion in Chemical Biolog 15, 38-47 (2011). Molinski, T.F. NMR of natural products at the 'nanomole-scale'. NaturalProduct Reports 27, 321-329 (2010). Yadav, G., Gokhale, R.S. & Mohanty, D. Computational approach for prediction of domain organization and substrate specificity of modular polyketide synthases. Journalof Molecular Biolog 328, 335-363 (2003). 166. 167. 168. 169. 170. 171. 172. Medema, M.H., Blin, K., Cimermancic, P., Jager, V.d., Zakrzewski, P., Fischbach, M., Weber, T., Takano, E. & Breitling, R. antiSMASH: Rapid identification, annotation and analysis of secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters in bacterial and fungal genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Research 39, W339-W346 (2011). Challis, G.L., Ravel, J. & Townsend, C.A. Predictive, structure-based model of amino acid recognition by nonribosomal peptide synthetase adenylation domains. Chemistry 6- Biology 7, 211-224 (2000). Challis, G.L. & Ravel, J. Ceolichelin, a new peptide siderophore encoded by the Streptomyces coelicolor genome: Structure prediction from the sequence of its non-ribosomal peptide synthetase. FEMS Microbiology Letters 187, 111-114 (2000). Lautru, S., Deeth, R.J., Bailey, L.M. & Challis, G.L. Discovery of a new peptide natural product by Streptomyces coelicolor genome mining. Nature Chemical Biolog 1, 265-269 (2005). Dietrich, J.A., Yoshikuni, Y., Fisher, K.J., Woolard, F.X., Ockey, D., McPhee, D.J., Renninger, N.S., Chang, M.C., Baker, D. & Keasling, J.D. A novel semi-biosynthetic route for artemisinin production using engineered substrate-promiscuous P450(BM3). ACS Chemical Biolog 4, 261-267 (2009). Sach, N. in Optimizing Organic ReactionsVancouver, BC; 2008). Kanan, M.W., Rozenman, M.M., Sakurai, K., Snyder, T.M. & Liu, D.R. Reaction discovery enabled by DNA-templated synthesis and in vitro selection. Nature431, 545-549 (2004). 138 173. 174. 175. 176. 177. 178. 179. 180. Robbins, D.W. & Hartwig, J.F. A simple, multidimensional approach to high-throughput discovery of catalytic reactions. Science 333, 1423-1427 (2011). Baxendale, I.R., Deeley, J., Griffiths-Jones, C.M., Ley, S.V., Saaby, S. & Tranmer, G.K. A flow process for the multi-step synthesis of the alkaloid natural product oxomaritidine: A new paradigm for molecular assembly. Chemical Communications, 2566-2568 (2006). Petersen, T.P., Ritzen, A. & Ulven, T. A multistep continuous-flow system for rapid ondemand synthesis of receptor ligands. OrganicLetters 11, 5134-5137 (2009). Goodell, J.R., McMullen, J.P., Zaborenko, N., Maloney, J.R., Ho, C.-X., Jensen, K.F., J. A. Porco, J. & Beeler, A.B. Development of an automated microfluidic reaction platform for multidimensional screening: Reaction discovery employing bicyclo[3.2.1]octanoid scaffolds. Journalof Organic Chemistry 74, 6169-6180 (2009). Koller, M.R., Emerson, S.G. & Palsson, B.O. Large-scale expansion of human stem and progenitor cells from bone marrow mononuclear cells in continuous perfusion cultures. Blood 82, 378-384 (1993). Jungbauer, A. & Peng, J. Continous bioprocessing: An interview with Konstantin Konstantinov from Genzyme. BiotechnologyJournal6, 1431-1434 (2011). Trost, B.M. The Atom Economy - The Search for Synthetic Efficiency. Science 254, 14711477 (1991). Rawlins, M.D. Cutting the cost of drug development? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 3, 360-364 (2004). 139 Appendix A: List of taxanes analyzed for mapping the taxane biosynthetic pathway 141 [2aalpha,4beta,4abeta,6bet a,9alpha(alphaR*,betaS*),1 1alpha,12alpha,1 2aalpha,1 2balpha]]-beta4290260 C47H51 N (benzoylamino)-alphaView in 014 hydroxy-benzenepropanoic Reaxys acid, 6,12b-bis(acetyloxy)12-(benzoyloxy)2a4,4a,5,6,9,10,11,12,12 a,12b-dodecahydro-4,1 1- 33069-624; 10545404-4; 119323-97 6; 14755712-8; 148553-70 2; 14919723-9 C47H51014 heterocyclic N 853.92 Journal; Dong, Huiru; Luo, Lina; Zhou, Shan; Bi, Pengyu; Liu, Kailu; Zhao, Jingcheng; Chemistry of Natural Compounds; vol. 43; 4; (2007); p. 478 - 480; Khimiya Prirodnykh Soedinenii; 4; (2007); p. 392 - 393; View in Reaxys RCINICONZ NJXQFMZXODVAD SA-N dihydroxy-4a,8,13,a.13-1 f2aR[2alpha,4beta,4abeta,6bet a,9alphaelphaR*,betaS*),1 1alpha,12alpha,I2aalpha,1 Z2 (benzoylamino)-alpha- hydroxy-benzenepropanoic acid, 6,12b-bis(acetyloxy)- ,Journal; 11923-97. 4290260 2balpha]-betaC47H51N S (benzoylamino)-alpha014 e hydroxy-benzenepropanoic Rexsacid, 6,12b-bis(acetyloxy)12-(benzoyloxy)2a,3,44a,5,6,9,10,11,12,12 a,12b-dodecahydro-4,1 1-239wc dihydroxy-4a,8,13,13-III [2aR[2aalpha,4beta,4abeta,6bet a,9alpha(alphaR*,betaS*),1 1alpha,12alpha,12aalpha,1 2balpha]]-beta- V I bnv HI 306-2 433069 62- C47H51014 N RCINICONZ hrcNJXQFMZXODVAD 1-;SA-N ReansReax8; 2349- ln 33069-62Bai, Jiao; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Toyoizumi, Kazuki; Fu, Liwei; Zhang, Shujun; Dai, Jungui; Sakai, Junichi; Hirose, Katutoshi; 1;Yamori, Takao; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; .mJournal; 00545413-57 C47H51N 014 853.92 C47H51014 N heterocyclic RCINICONZ NJXQF- yung dmr ofTawin MZXODVAD SA-N 12-(benzoyloxy)-148553-7 2a.3,44a,5,6,9,10,11,2,12 2; 149197- a, 12b-dodecahydro-4,1 1- 23-9 dihydroxy-4a,8,13,13[2aR[2aalpha,4beta,4abeta,6bet a,9alpha(alphaR*,betaS*),1 1alpha,12alpha,12aapha,1 1; (2004); p. 58 - 63; View in Reaxys (a) washing a raw material with 044RM) 119323-97 853.92 6147557- 85.2 12-8with 148553;70 2; 149197-. 23-9 2 4751014heterocyclic N heeoylcMZODVAD RCINICONZ NJXQF- water; (b) extracting SA-N organic solvent a wet RM; (c) contacting the wet RMI 33069-624; 105454- 6;14755714757 148553-70 2; 149197- Patent; Chaichem Pharmaceuticals International; US6759539; 831; (2004); View in Reaxys Joumal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; 0454; 1alpha,l2alpha,12aalpha,1 4290260 2balpha]]-betaView (benzoylamino)-alphaC47H51N hydroxy-benzenepropanoic 014 Reaxys acid, 6,12b-bis(acetyloxy)12-(benzoyloxy)2a,3,4,4a,5,6,9,10,11,12,12 a,12b-dodecahydro-4,1 1I_ _ _ dihvdroxy-4a,8,13,13- Journal of Natural Products; vol. 67; 33069-624 105454- 4290260 2balpha]]-betaC4751N (benzoyamino)-apha04 view in hyrx-eznpoaoc Reaxys hydroxy-benzenepropanoic 014 acid, 6,12b-bis(acetyloxy)12-(benzoyloxy)2a,3,4,4a,5,6,9,10,11,12,12 a,12b-dodecahydro-4,1 1dihvdroxy-4a,8,13,13[2aR[2aalpha,4beta,4abeta,6bet a,9alpha(alphaR*,betaS*),1 4290260 2balpha]]-betaC47H51N View in (benzoylamino)-alpha014 hydroxy-benzenepropanoic acid, 6,12b-bis(acetyloxy)12-(benzoyloxy)2a,3,4,4a,5,6,9,10,11,12,12 a,12b-dodecahydro-4,11_dihvdroxy-4a,8,13.13[2aR[2aalpha,4beta,4abeta,6bet a,9alpha(alphaR*,betaS*),1 1alpha,12alpha,12aalpha,1 Bai, Jiao; Ito, Nobuhide; Sakai, Junichi; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Fujisawa, Hajime; Bai, Liming; Dai, Jungui; Zhang, Shujun; Hirose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 68; 4; (2005); p. 497 - 501; View in Reaxys 853.92 C47H51014 heterocyclic N RCINICONZ NJXQFMZXODVAD SA-N Rithner, Christopher D.; Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View in Reaxys 23-9 33069-624 044- 119323-97 6; 14755712-8; 148553-70 RCINICONZ 853.92 C47H51014 heterocyclic NMXDA NM SA-N 2; 14919723-9 I Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys 8 is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita 0.; Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys [2aR[2aalpha,4beta,4abeta,6bet a,9alpha(alphaR*,betaS*),1 V4ewin Reaxys 33069-624; 10454- 04~ 1 2a]]-beta. ,2b 42902 2bapha]]-beta-119323-97. 4290260 14755C47H51N (benzoylamino)-alpha014 hydroxy-benzenepropanoic hyrx-ezeerp 0e14y 148553-70 12-8; acid, 6,12b-bis(acetyloxy)-i 12-(benzoyloxy)2a,3,4,4a,5,6,9,10,11,12,12 a,12b-dodecahydro-4,1 1idihvdroxy-4a,8,13.13[2aR[2aalpha,4beta,4abeta,6bet a,9alpha(alphaR*,betaS*),1 4290260 View n SRexs 9 -- - . RCINICONZ NJXQFMZXODVAD SA-N C4751014 N heterocyclic RCINICONZ NJXQFMZXODVAD ihvdroxv-4a.8.13.13- [2aR33069-62[2aalpha,4beta,4abeta,6bet 4; 105454a,9alpha(alphaR*,betaS*),1 1alpha,12alpha,12aalpha,1 4; 05454 2balpha]]-beta119323-97 42n9y0mi26al0a 4H 1192 97 C4751N 6; 147557- 853.92 benzoylamino)-alphaV hydroxy-benzenepropanoic 014 12-8; acid, 6,12b-bis(acetyloxy)148553-70 2 14919712-(benzoyloxy)232a3,4,4a,5,6,9,10,11,12,12 23-9 a,12b-dodecahydro-4,1113dihvdroxy-4a.8.13 [2aR[2aalpha,4beta,4abeta,6bet 33069-62a,9alpha(alphaR*,betaS*),1 4; 10545404-4; 1alpha,12alpha,12aalpha,1 19~-' 2balpha]]-betaC47H51N (benzoylamino)-alphaView0in hydroxy-benzenepropanoic 014 6; 147557- 853.92 12-8; Reaxys 148553-70 acid, 6,12b-bis(acetyloxy)Ra 12-(benzoyloxy)2; 1491972a,3,4,4a,5,6,9,10,11,12,12 23-9 a,12b-dodecahydro-4,11dihvdroxy-4a8 13.13[2aR[2aalpha,4beta,4abeta,6bet 33069-62a,9alpha(alphaR*,betaS*),1 4 1054544;stems 1alpha,12alpha,12aalpha,1 04-4, 2balpha]]-betaC47H51N 119323-97 (benzoylamino)-alphaView in 6; 147557- 853.92 Reaxys acid, 6,12b-bis(acetyloxy)12-8; OH HO HO H Reaxys 0 0 o benzoyloxy-5,20-epoxy-9oxo-1,7,10,131-ene; 10P-deacetylbaccatin Ill; 10-0-deacetylbaccatin 111 ~tetrahydroxytax-1 Journal; Kawamura, Fumio; Kikuchi, Yoshinari; Ohira, Tatsuro; Yatagai, Mitsuyoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 62; 2; (1999); p. 244 247; View in Reaxys 6aN of Taws 0uspidta Zdc nelso Japanese C471-51 014 N heterocyclic C47H51014 N heterocyclic RCINICONZ NJXQF-Sa Joumal; Murakami, Ryo; Shi, Qingwen; Oritani, Takayuki; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 52; 8; (1999); p. 1577 - 1580; View in (199) Reaxys - tZ= MZXODVAD SA-N Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxys RCINICONZ NJXQFXO ADvl4;2(19)p.11-13; SA-N C47H51014 N heterocyclic RCINICONZ NJXQFMZXODVAD SA-N dihvdrox-4a8.1313HO plde oft j y#WTV ',Shigemori, t 2 14919723-9 2- 12-(benzoyloxy)2a,3,4,4a,5,6,9,10,11,12,12 a,12b-dodecahydro-4,1 110-deacetyl baccatin Ill; 10-desacetylbaccatin 10-deacetylbaccatin 1ll; 10-Deacetyl baccatin; 1445248 (1S,2S,3R,4S,5R,7S,8S,10 View in R,13S)-4-acetoxy-2- Journal; Aoyagi, Hideki; DiCosmo, Frank; Tanaka, Hideo; Planta Medica; vol. 68; 5; (2002); p. 420 424; View in Reaxys slwfo 2; 14919723-9 33069-624; 10545404-4; 1alpha,12alpha,12aalpha,1 119323-97 2balpha]]-betaC47H51N 6; 147557- 853.92 (benzoylamino)-alpha014 hydroxy-benzenepropanoic acid, 6,12b-bis(acetyloxy)148553-70S 12-(benzoyloxy)2; 1491972a,3,4,4a,5,6,9,10,11,12,12 23-9 a,12b-dodecahydro-4,11- _ C47H51014 N Eamlt f Taxane- containing .ll; material is w n inig chipped into maerlpiW small pieces Patent; Phytogen Life Sciences Inc.; and inc;e extracted (8h US2005/288520; Al; (2005); View in Reaxys 3days) with ' v -edlibis 0 32981-865; 7162992 92993-544.599 4; 11550992-7 C29H36010 heterocyclic YWLXLRUD GLRYDRZHPRIASZS A-N Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected by Elsevier Properties SA and used under license. Journal; Kobayashi, Junichi; Ogiwara, Aya; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Hideyuki; Yoshida, Naotoshi; et al.; Tetrahedron; vol. 50; 25; (1994); p. 7401 - 7416; View in Reaxys species of organic Yow plants solvent, cmpn preferably the-r ]methanol, (6-, Ho OH H Ho 0 H H O Ho OH H HO HO H;115509- 0 10-deacety baccatin 1ll; 10-desacetylbaccatin III; 10-deacetylbaccatin 111; 32981-8610-Deacetyl baccatin; 5; 716291445248 (1S,2S,3R,4S,5R,7S,8S,10 C29H360 92-010544.599 View in R,13S)-4-acetoxy-2Reaxys benzoyloxy-5,20-epoxy-94; 115509oxo-1,7,10,1392-7 tetrahydroxytax- 11-ene; 100-deacetylbaccatin IlIl; 10-0-deacetylbaccatin III 10-deacetyl baccatin III; 10-desacetylbaccatin li1; 10-deacetylbaccatin 111; 32981-8610-Deacetyl baccatin; 5;716291445248 (1S,2S,3R,4S,5R,7S,8S,10 C29H360 92-0View in R,13S)-4-acetoxy-210 92999-93Reaxys benzoyloxy-5,20-epoxy-94; 0 oxo-1,7,10,13tetrahydroxytax-1 1-ene; 1OP-deacetylbaccatin Ill; 10-0-deacetylbaccatin III -\ 0 baccatine Ill; 4732442 baccatin Ill; 47 VOoe baccatin-il; Reaxys baccatin; Baccatin I1; YWLXLRUD C29H36010 .3GLRYDRheterocyclic A-N 5 C29H36010 . heterocyclic YWLXLRUD GLRYDRZHPRIASZS A-N Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxys OVMSOCFB DVBLFWVHLOTGQH SA-N Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.; Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62: 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View in Reaxys OVMSOCFB DVBLFWVHLOTGQH SA-N Joumal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Sauriol. Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita 0.; Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys 92-7 27548-93C311H380 2 107711 81-3 586.636 C31H38011 heterocyclic BACCIII 0 baccatine III; baccatin I1; 4732442 o 473442baccatin-Ill; View in baccatin; Reaxys ReaysBaccatin IlIl; BACC Ill 27548-93C31 H380 27548-932;3107781-3 586.636 C31H38011 heterocyclic 27548-93C31H380 2; 31077- 586.636 81-3VHLOTGQH 11 C31H38011 heterocyclic baccatine 1ll; Oo 4732442 baccatin 1i; View in baccati-ill; Reaxys baccatin; Baccatin Ill; BACC Ill 10-deacetyl taxol(7a-OH); 7-epi-10-deacetyltaxol; 4290167 10-deacetyl-paclitaxel; -ect View in 10-deacetylpaclitaxel; Reaxys 10-deacetyltaxol A; 10-deacetyl taxol; 10-deacetyltaxol Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.; Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View in Reaxys 78432-776; 7845417-8; 125354-13 C -8183C45H49N01 C45H49N 013 4; 133577- 811.883 3 34-1; 133577-35 2; 13550118-7 OVMSOCFB DVBLFWSA-N heterocyclic TYLVGQKN NUHXIPMHHARFCS SA-N Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. Journal; Kawamura, Fumio; Kikuchi, Yoshinari; Ohira, Tatsuro; Yatagai, Mitsuyoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 62; 2; (1999); p. 244 247; View in Reaxys Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.;Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita 0.; Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys 4290167 View in Reaxys 10-deacetyl taxol(7a-OH); 7-epi-1O-deacetyltaxol; 10-deacetyl-paclitaxel; 10-deacetylpaclitaxel; 10-deacetyltaxol A; 1O-deacetyl taxol; 10-deacetyltaxol 78432-776; 7845417-8; C45H49N 125354-13 013 4; 133577- 811.883 34-1;MSA-N 133577-35 2; 13550118-7 C45H49NO1 3 heterocyclic 3'-N-(trans-2-methyl-2butenoyi)-3'-N8032151 V ew in Reaxvs debenzoylpaclitaxel; chephalomannine; caphalomannine; taxol B; cephalomannine C45H53N 71610-009 014 831.914 C45H53014 heterocyclic N stems of Japanese yew Taxus cuspiata Sol.47 ZUcc. TYLVGQKN NUHXIPMHHARFCS Identification(14) DBXFAPJCZ Physical Data(1) ABTDR- Spectra(12) WBYYIXQIS Us/pl0ains Bioactivity/Ecotox(40) Use/Application(5) A-N 35 Journal; Dong, Huiru; Luo, Lina; Zhou, Shan; Bi, Pengyu; Liu, Kailu; Zhao, Jingcheng; Chemistry of vol. 43; 4; p. Natural Compounds; Compound; 4;o(2007; Pauroyal (2007); p. 478 - 480; Khimiya Prodnykh Soedinenii; 4; (2007); p. 392 - 393; View in Reaxvs 40 3'-N-(trans-2-methyl-2butenoyl)-3'-N8032151 debenzoylpaclitaxel; chephalomannine; View in Cephalomannine; caphalomannine; C45H53N 014 71610-009 831.914 C45H53014 N heterocyclic DBXFAPJCZ ABTDRWBYYlXQlS A-N n taxol B; cephalomannine 3'-N-(trans-2-methyl-2butenoyl)-3'-N8032151debenzoylpaclitaxel; V032151 chephalomannineCephalomannine; Reaxys ophalomannine; C45H53014 N C45H53N 71610-009 014 . Journal; Bai, Jiao; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Toyoizumi, Kazuki; Fu, Liwei; Zhang, Shujun; Dai, Jungui; Sakai, Junichi; Hirose, Katutoshi; Yamori, Takao; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 67; 1; (2004); p. 58 - 63; View in Reaxys Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.;Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View in Reaxys DBXFAPJCZ ABTDRWBYYlXQIS A-N taxol B; cephalomannine 3'-N-(trans-2-methyl-2butenoyl)-3'-Ndebenzoylpaclitaxel; V 802 1chephalomannine; VeinCephalomannine; oA-N C Reaxy s caphalomannine; taxol B; Joumal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; Reaxys 2; e Rki C45H53N 71610-009 014 831.914 8194 C45H53014 heterocyclic heeoycWBYlXlS N DBXFAPJCZ ABTDR- Journal; Murakami, Ryo; Shi, Qing5 4 A-N emity (Elsevier); (Elsev i; vol. 52; 8; P Phytochemistry (1999); p. 1577 - 1580; View in Reaxys cephalomannine 3'-N-(trans-2-methyl-2butenoyl)-3'-Ndebenzoylpaclitaxel; 8032151 chephalomannine; View in Cephalomannine; Reaxys caphalomannine; C45H53N 04 014 71610-009 9 831.914 C45H53014 N heeocci heterocyclc DBXFAPJCZ ABTDRWBYYIXQISoHieyk; WBYYlXQIS A-N taxol B; cephalomannine Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected by Elsevier Properties SA and used under license. SMo Japan p yeShigemori, cusphata Sieb.et u- Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Hideyuki; Heterocycles; eerccls vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxys Journal; Oshige, Masahiko; Takenouchi, Mika; Kato, Yasutaro; Kamisuki, Sinji; Takeuchi, Toshifumi; Kuramochi, Kouji; Shiina, Isamu; Suenaga, Yoshihito; Kawakita, Yoichi; Kuroda, Kazufumi; Sato, Noriyuki; et al.; Bloorganic & Medicinal Chemistry; vol. 12; 10; (2004); p. 2597 - 2602; View in Reaxys Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita 0.; Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys Journal; Murakami, Ryo; Shi, Qingwen; Oritani, Takayuki; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 52; 8; (1999); p. 1577 - 1580; View in Reaxys Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxys Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Ogiwara, Aya; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Yoshida, Naotoshi; et al.; Tetrahedron; vol. 50; 25; (1994); p. 7401 - 7416; View in Reaxys Journal; Kondo; Takahashi; Yakugaku Zasshi; vol. 45; (1925); p. 861,874; dtsch. Ref. Nr. 524, S. 2; Chem.Abstr.; (1926); p. 767; View in Reaxys Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. 2a,5a,1 00,140-tetraacetoxy 4(20),1-taxadiene; taxuyunnanine C; dark brown callus of TaKus KFFHSFCO 05 02a,510p4-tetraacetoxy ViewView in 134in taxa-4(20),11(12)-diene; Reaxys 2a,5a,10P,14p- 156127-34 C28H400 3 8 4(20),11(12)-diene; 2a,5a,10p,14p-tetra-c acetoxy-4(20),11taxadiene; 2a,5a,10s,140-tetraacetoxy 4(20),1 1-taxadiene; taxuyunnanine C: sinenxan A; 2a,5a,1Op,14p-tetraacetoxy 7059440 taxa-4(20),11(12)-diene C28H400 156127-34 view in 2a,5a,10p,14p8 3 Reaxys tetraacetoxytaxa4(20),11(12)-diene;c 20,50,10p,140-tetraacetoxy-4(20),1 1taxadiene_ 2a,5a,10p, 14p-tetraacetoxy 4(20),1 1-taxadiene; taxuyunnanine C; sinenxan A; 2a,5a,10p,14p-tetraacetoxy C28H400 156127-34 7059440 taxa-4(20),11(12)-diene; View in 2a,5a,10p,14p8 3 Reaxys tetraacetoxytaxa- 54621 5461 C2814008 C840 lic schcVCPDXWRA KCGBBWSA-N 2a-deacetoxytaxinine J; 2-desacetoxytaxinine J; 6637340 2-deacetoxytaxinine J; Viewin 2-desacetyltaxinine J; Reaxys 2-deacetoxytaxinin J; Jungui; Zhang, Shujun; Hirose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 68; 4; (2005); p. 497 - 501; View in Reaxys aosse) -_--,- Sendai w iduced from young 3tems of Tla caus 504.621 C28H4008 isocychc KFFHSFCO KCGBBWVCPDXWRA SA-N cuspidta Seb. et d Sendai, 504.621 C28H4008 . . isocychc KFFHSFCO KCGBBWVCPDXWRA SA-N cetf mitdme Of Tgus apid-* (P93i) )rnf Tutx cy, media 4(20),11(12)-diene; 2a,5a,10p,14p-tetraacetoxy-4(20),1 1taxadiene_ n Journal; Bai, Jiao; Ito, Nobuhide; Sakai, Junichi; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Fujisawa, Hajime; Bai, Liming; Dai, C37H460 119347-14 10 7 650.766 C37.46010 lic socyci MIJTXBNFQ DJTPLPXORYUGN SA-N isocyclic MIJTXBNFQ DJTPLPXORYUGN SA-N sns o Jaanese asShigemori, Journal; Bai, Jiao; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Toyoizumi, Kazuki; Fu, Liwei; Zhang, Shujun; Dai, Jungui; Sakai, Junichi; Hirose, Katutoshi; Yamori, Takao; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 67; 1; (2004); p. 58 - 63; View in Reaxys Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.; Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View in Reaxys Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxys cinnamate 5 2a-deacetoxytaxinine J; 68373402-desacetoxytaxinine J; 6837340 2-deacetoxytaxinine J; view in 2-desacetyltaxinine J; Rea xys 2-deacetoxytaxinin J; stems gi the C37H460 119347-14. 10 650.766 7 C37H46010 cinnamate 5 yerTau Aldb, 6t &c:Reaxys cafus O e of1ausn 3115696 (+)-taxusin; View in taxusin Reaxys Taxusin C28H400 19605-80~ 8 2; 11600225-6 504.621 C28H4008 isocyclic SKJSIVQEP KBFTJHUWILPJBS A-N Copyright @2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected by Elsevier Properties SA and used under license. Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Ogiwara, Aya; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Yoshida, Naotoshi; et al.; Tetrahedron; vol. 50; 25; (1994); p. 7401 - 7416; View in Joumal; Bai, Jiao; Ito, Nobuhide; Sakai, Junichi; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Fujisawa, Hajime; Bai, Liming; Dai, Jungui; Zhang, Shujun; Hirose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 68; 4; (2005); p. 497 - 501; View in Reaxys Journal; Miyazaki,M. et al.; Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin; vol. 16; (1968); p. 546 - 548;;: Journal; Sugiyama, Takeyoshi; Oritani, Takayuki; Oritani, Takashi; Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry; vol. 58; 10; (1994); p. 1923 - 1924; View in Reaxys Joumal; Bai, Jiao; Ito, Nobuhide; Sakai, Junichi; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Fujisawa, Hajime; Bai, Liming; Dai, Jungui; Zhang, Shujun; Hirose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 68; 4; (2005); p. 497 - 501; View in Reaxys Journal; Bai, Jiao; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Toyoizumi, Kazuki; Fu, Liwei; Zhang, Shujun; Dai, Jungui; Sakai, Junichi; Hirose, Katutoshi; Yamori, Takao; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 67; 1; (2004); p. 58 - 63; View in Reaxys Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxys Journal; Murakami, Ryo; Shi, Qingwen; Oritani, Takayuki; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 52; 8; (1999); p. 1577 - 1580; View in Reaxys Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemor, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; 1111 vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. - 1134; View in Reaxys Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. 0 stemsd the, Japanese yew Taxus mapitt Sieb. at \ 6853366 View in Reaxys taxinine A C26H360 18530-098 1 476.567 C26H3608 OQXJKHGIA ZCMBXSOIIJPRYSA N isocyclic Zucc. Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Ogiwara, Aya; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Shigemor, Hideyuki; Yoshida, Naotoshi; et al.; Tetrahedron; vol. 50; 25; (1994); p. 7401 - 7416; View in Reaxys H0 0 dark brow -i 6952531 695253 Reaxys 3'-N-hexanoyl-3'-Ndebenzoylpaclitaxel; debenuyunasite0; taxuyunnanin; taxoi C C46H57N 153415-45 14847.957 C46H57NO1 heterocyclic BEHTXUBG UDGCNQIEAAAIHOS A-N Identification(11) Physical Data(3) Spectra(9) Bioactivity/Ecotox(12) 2of 15 15 u 16 16 -Yw ca"us OAbM inducedIfiiJournal; flem young 6952531 View in Reaxys 3'-N-hexanoyl-3'-Ndebenzoylpaclitaxel;153415-45 847.957 taxuyunnansine; 3 014 taxuyunnanin; taxol C C46H57N1 heterocyclic 4IEAAAIH0S of'T1;U BEHTXUBG UDGNA-N t Ccoeedin Sennds c 3'-N-hexanoyl-3'-N6952531 debenzoylpaclitaxel; View in taxuyunnansine; Reaxys taxuyunnanin; taxol C 6952531 View in 3'-N-hexanoyl-3'-Ndebenzoypaclitaxel; taxuyunnansine; taxuyunnanin; taxol C C46H57N 153415-45 014 3 C46H57NO1 4 3'-Nhexnoy-3'NC46H57N 153415-45 C46H57NO1 01495 4 4Reaxys 3 . . heterocyclic BEHTXUBG UDGCNQIEAAAIHOS A-N ( BEHTXUBG BHTXBG UDGCNQEAAAHOS A-N a 6wlf Journal; Bai, Jiao; Ito, Nobuhide; Sakai, Junichi; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Fujisawa, Hajime; Bai, Liming; Dai, Jungui; Zhang, Shujun; Hirose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal Natural Products; vol. 68; 4; (2005); p.497 - 501; View n Reaxys Bai, Jiao; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Toyoizumi, Kazuki; Fu, Liwei; Zhang, Shujun; Dai, Jungui; Sakai, Junichi; Hirose, Katutoshi; Yamori, Takao; Tomida, Akihimo; Tsuruo Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 67; 1; (2004); p. 58 - 63; View in Reaxys Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.; Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View in Reaxys Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, TOrval; Zamir, Lolita o.;Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys stefm of 6952531 View in Reaxys 3'-N-hexanoyl-3'-Ndebenzoylpaclitaxel; taxuyunnansine; taxuyunnanin; taxol C C46H57N 153415-45 1 3 BEHTXUBG UDGCNQ- C46H57NO1 847.957 4 heterocyclic Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111- 1134; View in Reaxys IEAAAIHOS A-Nieb | |~ Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. 2a,5a,10-triacetoxy-143(2'-methyl)-butysyloxy4(20),11-taxadiene; 2a,5a,1 00-triacetoxytaxa755733 4(20),11(12)-dien-14p-y 2C31 H460 methylbutyrate; View in~5,0-ractx-43 Rexs2a,5a,100I-triacetoxy-14pReaxys (2'-methyl)butyryloxy- 4(20),1 1-taxadiene; 2a,5a,100-triacetoxy-140(2-methyl-butyryloxy)14(20)1 1-taxadiene; 2a,5a,1 00-triacetoxy-14p(2'-methyl)-butysyoxy4(20),1 1-taxadiene; 2a,5a,100-triacetoxytaxa4(20),11(12)-dien-14p-yl 2- 7557334 View in methylbutyrate; ; eays2a,5a,100-triacetoxy-14p- 546.701 C31H4608 isocyclic A-N 546.701 C311H4608 isocyclic 8 1 Bioactivity/Ecotox(44) Journal; Bai, Jiao; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Toyoizumi, Kazuki; Fu, Liwei; Zhang, Shujun; Dai, Jungui; Sakai, Junichi; Hirose, Katutoshi; Yamori, Takao; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 67; 1; (2004); p. 58 - 63; View in Reaxys USNOOZXS USNOOZXSt;C3 AYFE ALYFCE-S ALLYKNSAS A-N (2'-methyl)butyryloxy4(20),1 1-taxadiene; 2a,5a,100i-triacetoxy-14p(2-methyl-butyryloxy)- Y 20 ALLYKNSAS Spectra(8) 8 H6 C31H460 USNOOZXS Identification(9) Phcal Data(S) a2 ALYFCEAIYFCEPhysical Journal; Bai, Jiao; Ito, Nobuhide; Sakai, Junichi; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Fujisawa, Hajime; Bai, Liming; Dai, Jungui; Zhang, Shujun; Hirose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 68; 4; (2005); p. 497 - 501; View in Reaxys 4(20)1 1-taxadiene; 2a,5a,10si-triacetoxy-140(2'-methyl)-butysyloxy4(20),1 1-taxadiene; 2a,5a,1 00-triacetoxytaxa7557334 4(20),11(12)-dien-140-yl 2C31H460 methylbutyrate; V;ew 8 2a,5a,10-triacetoxy-14p(2'-methyl)butyryloxy1-taxadiene; 4(20),1 2a 5,5a,1 00-triacetoxy-140(2-methyl-butyryloxy)4(20) 1-taxadiene; 4633976 View in Reaxys 1p-hydroxybaccatin 1p-hydroxybaccatin-l; 10-Hydroxybaccatin I 6173928 View in 10-deacetyl-7-epipaclitaxel; 10-deacetyl-7-epi-taxol A; 10-deacetyl 7-epi-taxol; 10-deacetyl-7-epi-taxol Reaxys 14 C32H440 30244-372 14 546.701 C31H4608 socyclic USNOOZXS AIYFCEALLYKNSAS A-N Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.;Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View inReaxys 652.693 C32H44014 heterocyclic LUTPIRPNUI NHFEVMBMCFSISS A-N Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles: vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxys TYLVGQKN NUHXIP- C45H49N1 013 811.883 3 heterocyclic 7-epi-10-deacetyl taxol, 10-deacetyl-7-epitaxol; Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxys DIYBZAJCS -N - 7-epi-10-deacetyltaxol Sa-hydroxy2a,7p,9a,10p,1 3apentaacetoxy-4(20),1 1gotaxadiene; 0 -a-hydroxy- 5 View in Reaxys C30H420 84652-332a,70,9a,100,13a5 11 pentaacetoxytaxa-4(20),1 1diene; 5a-decinnamoyltaxinine J; 2-decinnamoyltaxinine J; decinnamoyl-taxinine J; decinnamoyltaxinine J 578.657 C30H42011 isocyclic Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.; Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View in Reaxys NTRHFSRA AXRZLCFJANQRQL SA-N Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. 1I o36 46 0~-.,pentaacetoxytaxa-4(20),11- ddiene; o View 32-ir Reaxys 5a-hydroxy2a,7P,9a,10p,13apentaacetoxy-4(20),1 1taxadiene; dRHFSR135 279 p 9a ,10p ,1a - C30H420 84652-338 5 2 -3 C3- H4 2 11 5 578 .657 Rsdcinn nSA-Naxinene 5a-decinnamoyltaxinine J; 2-decinnamoyltaxinine J; decinnamoyi-taxinine J; I decinnamovltaxinine J 5a-hydroxy2a,70,9a,10p,13apentaacetoxy-4(20), 11taxadiene; a-hydroxy60326335-ydoC30H420 84652-33- 578.657 view in 2a,7,9o,10P,13a5 11 Viewin pentaacetoxytaxa-4(20),11eaxys diene; _______________________decinnamoyl-taxinine C30 H4 20 11 A.X RZ LC FJANQRQL SA-N iso cyclic itthd thTracy t h e Ta xu '~Journal Se.e et Zucc. I stemO NTRHFSRA C30H4201.1 icclic C37H44011 isocyclic AXRZLCFJANQRQL SA-N lata Sieb. at a C37H440 11 664.75 Reaxs SLJNSLIEGI NNSE UWUO- JI UWUOQOJI SA-N SAN yeJournal; ol taxinin B . C37H440 11 NNEE- . ,fthe ya UWUOQQJI SA-N . cc 2,9,1 0-triacetyl-5-0cinnamoyltaxicin-1; 5-cinnamoyltaxicin I triacetate; i 13452-36O-cinnamoyltaxicin I C35H420 3; 148090triacetate; 72-6 10 5-cinnamoyltracetyltaxicin I; 0-cinnamoytaxicin; 1-hydroxytaxinine; 5-Cinnamoyltaxicin-l 2,9,10- 622.712 C35H42010 5843093 View O-cinnamoyltaxicin; 1-hydroxytaxinine; 5-Cinnamoyltaxicin-I 2,9,10triacetate isocyclic Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Ogiwara, Aya; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Yoshida, Naotoshi; et al.; Tetrahedron; vol. 50; 25; (1994); p. 7401 - 7416; View in Reaxys Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita 0.; Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys - - _____ ____triacetate 2,9,10-triacetyl-5-0cinnamoyltaxicin-I; 5-cinnamoyltaxicin I triacetate; 0-cinnamoyltaxicin I triacetate; Vein3148090cinnamyltriacetyltaxicin .Reaxys VBLNERPS NINUBRFRS A-N R Murakami, Ryo; Shi, Qingwen; Oritani, Takayuki; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 52; 8; (1999); p. 1577 - 1580; View in -Reaxys 4W. \4SLJNSLIEGI taxinine B; V7 5843093 View in Reaxys R" Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxys -deinamoyaineJ 2decinnamoyltaxinine J; decinnamoyltaxinine J; J; 6837456 View in taxinine B; RexstaxinineB Rainns iew Reaxys Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, Orva l; Z amir, Lolita 0 .; Cana d ian o.8;1 Jua 81; 1; Chemiatry; vol. offCeity (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys C35H420 13452-3610 7 622.712 VBLNERPS GWCFQJNINUBRFRS NINUBRFRS A-N C35H42010 I Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. stems of Japanese yew Taxs cdpidata Slab. Zucc. Joumal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111- 1134; View in Reaxys 2,q,1u-tnacetyl-5-O- cinnamoyltaxicin-1; 5-cinnamoyltaxicin I triacetate; O-cinnamoyltaxicin I 5843093 triacetate; View in 5-cinnamoyltriacetyltaxicin Reaxys -- 1; 13452-36C35H420 3; 14809010 72-6 622.712 1C35H42010 isocyclic VBLNERPS GWCFQJNINUBRFRS A-N Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Ogiwara, Aya; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Yoshida, Naotoshi; et al.; Tetrahedron; vol. 50; 25; (1994); p. 7401 - 7416; View in Reaxys isocyclic NNPJVZHKK MTATLGQZIMJKVS A-N Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxys isocyclic NNPJVZHKK MTATLGQZIMJKVS A-N Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Ogiwara, Aya; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Yoshida, Naotoshi; et al.; Tetrahedron; vol. 50; 25; (1994); p. 7401 - 7416; View in Reaxys O-cinnamoyltaxicin; 1-hydroxytaxinine; 5-Cinnamoyltaxicin- 2,9,10 triacetate 2-deacetoxy-5-(3'dimethylamino-3'phenylpropionoxy)taxinine 6041004 View in Vew Reaxs ~L. ~-JL6041004 2-pdeacetoxyaustrospicatine; C39H53N 119777-80. 695.851 2'010 9 desacetoxyaustrospicatine; 2desacetoxyaustrospicatine; desacetoxy-2' austrospicatine 2-deacetoxy-5-(3'dimethylamino-3'phenylpropionoxy)taxinine J; 2'p- View in deacetoxyaustrospicatine; Reaxys 2'desacetoxyaustrospicatine; 2desacetoxyaustrospicatine; desacetoxy-2' austrospicatine --- I C39H53N01 0 10pdeacetylcephalomannine; 7244187 10View in Deacetylcephalomannine; Reaxys 10-deacetyltaxol B; 10deacetylcephalomannine 695.851 C39H53N 119777-80 9 010 C39H53NO1 0 II C43H51N 013 76429-85- 1 789.877 C43H51NO1 3 . heterocyclic ADDGUHVE 43H51N 76429-851 013 10- Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxys heterocyclicJPNWQZGJKAWTKTS A-N 3 10p-hydroxy-2a,5a,14ptriacetoxy-4(20),1 1taxadiene; 10s-hydroxy-2a,5a,14p- "o - 0 Deacetylcephalomannine; 10-deacetyltaxol B; 10deacetylcephalomannine GJKIWTKTS A-N 10s3deacetylcephalomannine; View in Reaxys Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita 0.; Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys ADDGUHVE JPNWQZ- o o T 7553628 triacetoxytaxa-4(20),1 1View in diene; 10-desacetyl taxuyunnanine C; 10-deacetyltaxuyunnanine C; 10-deacetyltaxuyunnanin I C; C26H380 157056-97- 462.584 7 8 C26H3807 isocyclic RAKDXBHP Identification(9) GCOTQG- Physical Data(3) SFPMZPPX Spectra(5) SA-N Bioactivity/Ecotox(8) Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected by Elsevier Properties SA and used under license. 10 10 Journal; Bai, Jiao; Ito, Nobuhide; Sakai, Junichi; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Fujisawa, Hajime; Bai, Liming; Dai, Jungui; Zhang, Shujun; Hirose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 68; 4; (2005); p. 497 - 501; View in Reaxys dark brown 2a,5a,100-triacetoxy-14p(2'-methyl-3'-hydroxybutyryoxy)-(20),11 7558016 taxadiene; -JGMCYView J 2a,5a,10s-triacetoxy-14ptaxaReaxys (3-hydroxy-2methylbutyryloxy)-taxa4(20),11-diene; calus culure of Taxus FMPIEMVVE Slb et C31H460 9 562.701 C311H4609 isocyclic IRWPHO SA-N Yew' collected hn -ryunanaxane; Y 1-r Journal; Bai, Jiao; Ito, Nobuhide; Sakai, Junichi; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Fujisawa, Hajime; Bai, Liming; Dai, Jungui; Zhang, Shujun; Hirose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 68; 4; (2005); p. 497 - 501; View in Reaxys yunnanxane 2a,5a,1 Op-thacetoxy-143(2-methyl-t-hydroxy-14pbutyryloxy)-4(20), 1utaxadiene; 7558016 2axa,10-tnaetoxy-14View in methylbutyryloxy)taxaReaxys methylbryoxy-taxa-POL I*i from stams yo O(Taggs FMPIEMVVE JGMCY- 031H460 562.701 C31H4609 isocyclic cdita IRWPHO et Zucr., colleteden Sndal SA-N 4(20),11-diene; yunanaxane; yunnanxane Journal; Bai, Jiao; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Toyoizumi, Kazuki; Fu, Liwei; Zhang, Shujun; Dai, Jungui; Sakai, Junichi; Hirose, Katutoshi; Yamori, Takao; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 67; 1; (2004); p. 58 - 63; View n Reaxys dirk brown 2a-acetoxytaxusin; 6553639 2-acetoxytaxusin; View in 2o,5a,9a,100,13aReaxys pentaacetoxy-20(4),11taxadiene C30H420 10 562.657 C30H42010 isocyciic CNWPSHA WQVTMLNRQHYBHEC SA-N Identification(5) Physical Data(1) Spectra(4) Bioactivity/Ecotox(6) 2 9 codected In Journal; Bai, Jiao; Ito, Nobuhide; Sakai, Junichi; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Fujisawa, Hajime; Bai, Liming; Dai, Jungui; Zhang, Shujun; Hirose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 68; 4; (2005); p.497 - 501; View in Reaxys andel youtems of 2 eiyus 6553639 View in Reaxys 2a-acetoxytaxusin; 2-acetoxytaxusin0 2a,5a,9a,10p.13a20YBE So 0 113 30 pentaacetoxy-20(4),1 1taxadiene C31140 10 562.657 C30H-42010 isocyclic CNWPSHA WQVTMLNRHBE SA-N Sieb. at uc colectd in Jawgin (stimulated 6553639 View in Reaxys 0 0 ? "*0H 0 OH -. 2a-acetoxytaxusin; 2-acetoxytaxusin; 2a,5a,9a,10p,13apentaacetoxy-20(4),11taxadiene C30H420 10 1-hydroxyltaxinine A; 2a,9a,1 0p-triacetyl taxicin-1; triacetyl-5-decinnamoyl 6832866 taxicin I; Viw triacetyl-5C26H360 158137-46 View in decinnamoyltaxicine 1; 9 3 Reaxys triacetyl-5decinnamoyltaxicin I; 5-hydroxytriacetyltaxicin I; 5-hydroxytriacetyltaxicin-l 562.657 492.566 C30H42010 isocyclic C26H3609 . . isocyclic CNWPSHA WQVTMLNRQHYBHEC SA-N HMVNDOFA GCGZSAOPHIHEFFS A-N and used under license. Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA Japage yOghuMg cusi aa the Taxus Slab. et Journal; Bai, Jiao; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Toyoizumi, Kazuki; Fu, Liwei; Zhang, Shujun; Dai, Jungui; Sakai, Junichi; Hirose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Takao; Yamori, aoi aa;TmdAiio Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 67; 1; (2004); p. 58 - 63; View in Reaxys Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111- 1134; View in Reaxys Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Saurio, Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita 0.; Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys -V( ; 1 7842874 View in Reaxys 0oH 5-hydroxytaxinine B; taxuspine F; taxuspin F r C28H380 10 *i T 534.604 r T C28H380110 isocyclic 1 1 1 1 L~:i CWMUWKW ZNUFEDYLCFONYPQ SA-N Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111- 1134; View in Reaxys H 1p-dehydroxybaccatine VI; 8247724 1p-dehydroxybaccatin VI; View in 1-dehydroxybaccatin VI; Reaxys 1-deoxybaccatin VI; baccatin VI 10-dehydroxybaccatine VI; 8247724 10-dehydroxybaccatin VI; View in 1-dehydroxybaccatin VI; Reaxys 1-deoxybaccatin VI; baccatin VI C37H460 13 698.764 | C37H46013 I heterocyclic JHPBZGSKE Identification(8) SVROCPhysical Data(1) IGIVFXLZSABioactivity/Ecotox(2) N 10 9 Journal; Bai, Jiao; Ito, Nobuhide; Sakai, Junichi; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Fujisawa, Hajime; Bai, Liming; Dai, Jungui; Zhang, Shujun; H-irose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 68; 4; (2005); p. 497 - 501; View inReaxys 1$ Journal; Bai, Jiao; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Toyoizumi, Kazuki; Fu, Liwei; Zhang, Shujun; Dai, Jungui; Sakai, Junichi; Hirose, Katutoshi; Yamori, Takao; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 67; 1; (2004); p. 58 - 63; View in Reaxys JHPBZGSKE 3H46 13 698.764 C37H4601-3 heterocyclic SVROC- IGIVFXLZSA N I 8247724 View in Reaxys 10-dehydroxybaccatine VI; 1p-dehydroxybaccatin VI; C37H460 1-dehydroxybaccatin VI; 13 1-deoxybaccatin VI; baccatin VI 698.764 C37H46013 heterocyclic JHPBZGSKE SVROCIGIVFXLZSA N Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita 0.; Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys RIVHKUMN QRHVLQ- Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111- 1134; View in Reaxys 5a-cinnamoyloxy9a,100,1 3a-triacetoxytaxa4(20),11-diene; 5a-cinnamyloxy115810-14 4775260 9a, 100,13a-triacetoxytaxa592.73 C35H440 5; 136031View in 4(20),11-diene; 157WPPRULKU 15-7 88y J; Rexs2,7-deacetoxytaxinine J; 2-desacetoxytaxinine E; 2-desacetoxytaxinine; 9a, 10p,13a-triacetoxy-5acinnamoyoxytaxa-4(20),1 1- C35H4408 isocyclic SA-N diene 5a-cinnamoyloxy9a,1 0s,1 3a-triacetoxytaxa4(20),11-diene; 5a-cinnamyloxy115810-14 4775260 9a, 100,1 3a-triacetoxytaxaC35H440 5; 1 View in 4(20),11-diene; Reaxys 2,7-deacetoxytaxinine J; 8 12-desacetoxytaxinine E; 2-desacetoxytaxinine; 9a,10p,13a-triacetoxy-5acinnamoyoxytaxa-4(20),1 1diene 592.73 C35H4408 isocyclic RIVHKUMN QRHVLQWPPRULKU SA-N Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Ogiwara, Aya; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Yoshida, Naotoshi; at al.; Tetrahedron; vol. 50; 25; (1994); p. 7401 - 7416; View in Reaxys 2a,5a-dihydroxy70,9a,10p,1 3a-tetraacetoxy 4(20),1 1-taxadiene; 2a,5a-dihydroxyo2437p,9a,100,,13a-tetraacetyl6027 3 taxa-4(20),11-diene; Reeaxys 2a-deacetyl-5adecinnamoyltaxinine J; 1DOR C28H400 119777-84 3 10 536.62 C28H40010 isocyclic BACKFCRA HXFXCHLNLYLEBQS A-N 2-deacetoxy-5decinnamoytaxinin J; 2-deacetyl-5_decinnamoyltaxinine J: 2a,5a-dihydroxy7p,9a,1 06,13a-tetraacetoxy 4(20),1 1-taxadiene; 2a,5a-dihydroxy0106027483 View in Rewxin - Reaxy 7j,9a,10),13o-tetraacetytaxa-4(20), 11-diene; 2a-deacetyl-5adecinnamoyltaxinine J; BACKFCRA . C28H400 119777-84 3 10 . HXFXCH. LNLYLEBQS A-N Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita .; Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; 2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys thTa 40M Sieb. e( sms of Japanese yew Taus Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Sieoi ieui -eeoyls Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxys Sieb. ot 2c 2-deacetoxy-5- decinnamoyltaxinin J; 2-deacetyl-5decinnamoltaxinine J_ 8179958 baccatine IV; View in baccatin IV Reaxys C32H440 14 652.693 C32H44014 heterocychc CCJGGIKEF AWRENWBPIOOJS SA-N (P9MF) W Taxus " PG 8179958 View in baccatine IV; Reaxvs baccatin IV C32H440 14 652.693 C32H44014 heterocyclic eaxysSA-N(2003); CCJGGKEF AWRENWBPIOOJS ~ ~910; View in Reaxys Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita 0.; Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; footed the p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys (a) washing 0 Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.;Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 - ce4iultpes o axp a raw ~material r OOS c. 14282586 . C31 H400 View in 9-dihydro-13-acetylbaccatin Viwi -iyr-310 Reaxyis RexsSA-N 572.653 IWYSOZLAG HRRNQVGTKHVQN SAN C31H40010 - .water; . (RM) with (b) Patent; Chaichem Pharmaceuticals extracting1 Inentinl Intemational; US6759539; 61; an with (04;Ve nRay Reaxys View in ranc(2004); organic solvent a wet RM; (c) contacting the wet RM * .Reaxys 10-0-Acetyl-5-0cinnamoyltaxicine I; 5-cinnamoyl-1 010 cin 5840749 5View ir acetyltaxicin I; 5-0-cinnamoyltaxicin I; cinmt ;WANJournal Rx 5-Cinnamoyl-1 0- C31H380 139126-35 8 5 538.638 C31H3808 isocyclic NQSA NGEIXLIYAS WDWXCWQ WWCQJua acetyltaxicin-1 Copyright @2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. tooted utnso tns the & . t2003); Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita O.; Canadian o.8;1 81; 1; offCeity Chemistry; vol. (AS p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys 2a,5a,10s-triacetoxy-14ppropionyloxy-4(20),1 17556128 C29H420 taxadiene; View in 8 2a,5a,1 0p-triacetoxy-14pReaxys propionyloxytaxa-4(20), 11diene 2a,5a,100-triacetoxy-14ppropionyloxy-4(20), 117556128 C29H420 taxadiene; View in 8 2a,5a, 10p-triacetoxy-14pReaxvs propionyloxytaxa-4(20),1 1diene 2a,5a,10s-triacetoxy-14ppropionyloxy-4(20),1 17556128 C29H420 taxadiene; View in 8 2a,5a,100-triacetoxy-140Reaxys propionyloxytaxa-4(20), 11diene 7685130 View in baccatin VI Reaxys C37H460 14 518.648 | C29H4208 518.648 518.648 714.764 isocyclic ZWQAAAFH Identification(7) PAEGHUSpectra(3) WUJYLJESS Bioactivity/Ecotox(5) A-N 7 Journal; Bai, Jiao; Ito, Nobuhide; Sakai, Junichi; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Fujisawa, Hajime; Bai, Liming; Dai, Jungui; Zhang, Shujun; Hirose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 68; 4; (2005); p. 497 - 501; View in Reaxys isocyclic ZWQAAAFH PAEGHUWUJYLJESS A-N Journal; Bai, Jiao; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Toyoizumi, Kazuki; Fu, Liwei; Zhang, Shujun; Dai, Jungui; Sakai, Junichi; Hirose, Katutoshi; Yamor, Takao; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 67; 1; (2004); p. 58 - 63; View in Reaxys isocyclic ZWQAAAFH PAEGHUWUJYLJESS A-N Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.;Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View in Reaxys C37H46014 heterocyclic UJFKTEIDO RFVQSSKNQRQHZ SA-N Journal; Bai, Jiao; Ito, Nobuhide; Sakai, Junichi; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Fujisawa, Hajime; Bai, Liming; Dai, Jungui; Zhang, Shujun; Hirose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 68; 4; (2005); p. 497 - 501; View in Reaxys Journal; Bai, Jiao; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Toyoizumi, Kazuki; Fu, Liwei; Zhang, Shujun; Dai, Jungui; Sakai, Junichi; Hirose, Katutoshi; Yamori, Takao; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 67; 1; (2004); p. 58 - 63; View in Reaxys Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Saunol, Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita 0.; Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys C29H4208 C29H4208 7685130 View in baccatin VI Vew ibc14 ReaxysSAN C37H460 714.764 C37H46014 heterocyclic UJFKTEIDO RFVQSSKNQRQHZ SA-N 7685130 View in baccatin VI Reaxys C37H460 14 714.764 | C37H46014 heterocyclic UJFKTEIDO RFVQSSKNQRQHZ SA-N Identification(6) Physical Data(1) Spectra(3) Bioactivity/Ecotox(1) Copyright @2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. 1 7 2514274 taxinine; 5-0-Cinnamoyl-taxicin-IlView in acetat;3835-52-7 Re Taxinin C35H420 socyclic . BAYHEZUZ RPMUDMKMEJJDELS A-N the brancs OfTxus Identification(8) Physical Data(2) Spectra(4) Bioactivity/Ecotox(2) cupdata Sieb et Zucc. taxa-4(20),11-diene2a,5a,70,9a,100,13ahexanol hexaacetate; 2a,5a,70,9a,10p,13aVOUULHDF Identification(7) PJAWEH- Physical Data(1) Spectra(6) Bioactivity/Ecotox(3) SA-N 6036879 hexaacetoxytaxa-4(20),1 1C32H440 27854-046036879 diene; Vew in hexaacetoxy12 2 2a,5o,7P,9a,100,13a taxadiene-4(20),1 1; taxa-4(20),1 1-dien2a,5a,7p,9a,10P,13ahexaacetate'____ cWI 06bres Ofaltas 6 2 226KYYDYRBA 6 spida P93AF Taog mej0tcv. Tax= 3Journal; C1I00128-2162489-62 C31H400 5 11 7455839 View in taxuspine L Reaxys C32N460 3 13 588.652 C31H40011 heterocyclic YLAVPGTYT Identification(5) Physical Data(4) CSGNICSI4 (2 UFJLMRSIS Spectra(10) A-N Bioactivity/Ecotox(2) 638.709 C32H46013 isocyclic 6 -~b Z taxuspine L C32H460 13 638.709 C32H46013 isocyclic NSFKWNXC HYPDITPNQAOHGV SA-N 7455839 View in taxuspine L C32H460 13 638.709 C32H46013 isocyclic NSFKWNXC HYPDITPNQAOHGV SA-N Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. t . Morita, Hiroshi; Wei, Lan; Gonda, Akira; Takeya, Koichi; Itokawa, Hideji; Phytochemistry (Elsevier): vol. 46; 3; (1997); p. 583 586; View in Reaxys Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita 0.; Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys HYP CIT HYPDITPNQAOHGV KSA-N 7455839 Reaxys Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.;Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View in Reaxys _____ 7157364 10-deacetyl-9-dihydro-13ybacai II;; view Vie acetylbaccatin Reaxys 13-Acetyl-10-deacetyl-9dihydrobaccatin III View in Reaxys Journal; Konda, Yaeko; Sasaki, Tomomitsu; Sun, Xue-Long; Li, Xian; Onda, Masayuki; et al.; Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin; vol. 42; 12; (1994); p. 2621 - 2624; View in Reaxys y* Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemor, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111- 1134; View in Reaxys Journal; Wang, Xiao-xia; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Kobayshi, Jun'ichi; Tetrahedron; vol. 52; 7; (1996); p. 2337 - 2342; View in Reaxys 8024907 9a-deacetyltaxinine; View in 2,9-dideacetyltaxinine; Reaxys 9-deacetyltaxinine; taxinine NN-3 ye C33H400 8 9a-deacetyltaxinine; 8024907 2,9-dideacetyltaxinine; Rewxy isocyclic C33H400 8 9-deacetyltaxinine; taxinine NN-3 8024907 9a-deacetyltaxinine; 2,9-dideacetyltaxinine; 84 ein 564.676 1 C33H4008 8 9-deacetyltaxinine; taxinine NN-3 Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita 0.; Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys CZLWREWI XSHVJDAYFFSUKU SA-N Journal; Sakai, Jun-ichi; Sasaki, Hirofumi; Kosugi, Katsuhiko; Zhang, Shujun; Hirata, Naonori; Hirose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Heterocycles; vol. 54; 2; (2001); p. 999 - 1010; View in Reaxys SA-N Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxys isocyclic NQINDQGQ JLYFLPBRGCZQG SA-N Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita 0.; Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys isocyclic NQINDOGQ NIDG JLIYFLPBRGCZQG SA-N Journal; Wang, Xiao-xia; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 61; 4; (1998); p. 474 - 479; View in Reaxvs 564676 C334008 . isocyclicAYFFSUKU 608.729 C35H4409 C35H4409 C33H400 CZLWREWI XSHVJDAYFFSUKU SA-N CZLWREWI XSHVJD- 9,100,13a-triacetoxy-5a- -Reaxys 8125199 (cinnamoyloxy)taxaView in 4(20),11-dien-2a-ol; taxezopidine G; taxezopidin G; taxinine NN-1 C35H440 205440-22 8 9 3a-triacetoxy-5a9,100,131 (cinnamoyloxy)taxa8125199 View in 4(20),11-dien-2a-ol; Reaxys taxezopidine G; taxezopidin G; taxinine NN-1 -hydroxytaxusin; 8812346 e23i6 5,9a,1003,13oa dien-140-ol C35H440 205440-22 8 9 608.729 CKKORGV 1- C28H400 520.62 C28H4009 isocyclic Identification(6) WCAXDRR- Physical Data(2) SA-N Bioactivity/Ecotox(3) Copyright 1 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected by Elsevier Properties SA and used under license. 2 6 Journal; Bai, Jiao; Ito, Nobuhide; Sakai, Junichi; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Fujisawa, Hajime; Bai, Liming; Dai, Jungui; Zhang, Shujun; Hirose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 68; 4; (2005); p. 497 - 501; View in Reaxys 4 a yunnanxane; 2a,5a,1 0s-tracetoxy-14p[3(S)-hydroxy-2(R)-methyl9459194 butyryl]oxytaxa-4(20),11View in diene; Reaxys 2a,5a,10s3-triacetoxy-14p(3-hydroxy-2methyi)butyryloxytaxa4(20),11-diene C31H460 139713-81 9 8 562.701 C31H4609 uspensen cel utures o Taxus FMPIEMVVE JGMCYYYURHUSP SA-NTaus isocyclic Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.; Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901910; View in Reaxys (P9A) *n media Hk i dark br3wn C32H440 30244-35baccatin 1 1678159 16ew8in baccatin1 Reaxys 1p-hydroxybaccatiniwinbacctin13 0SA- 636.694 C32H44013 .6ey heterocyclic NHMSEMKT ntification(4) DAYSGWHIQOLQNM Physical Data() Spectra(2) heterocyclic NHMSEMKT DAYSGWHIQOLQNM SA-N Journal; Bai, Jiao; Ito, Nobuhide; Sakai, Junichi; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Fujisawa, Hajime; Bai, Liming; Dai, Jungui; Zhang, Shujun; Hirose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Joumal of Natural Products; vol. 68; 4; (2005); p. 497 - 501; View in Reaxys et 5 stgems View in baccatin 1; Rewys in-baccatin cti13 C32H440 30244-350 636.694 C32.44013 cesata- Sjjab, c 6 i Joumal; Bai, Jiao; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Toyoizumi, Kazuki; Fu, Liwei; Zhang, Shujun; Dai, Jungui; Sakai, Junichi; Hirose, Katutoshi; Yamori, Takao; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 67; 1; (2004); p. 58 - 63; View in Reaxys Si' 1678159 baccatin 1; View in baccatin Reaxys 11-hydroxybaccatin I( 7060991 View in Reaxys View in Reaxys 2a,5a,10p-tracetoxy-14p[(S)-2-methylbutyryloxy]4(20),11-taxadiene N-butyryl-Ndebenzoylpaclitaxel; taxcultine; taxol D C32H440 30244-3513 0 C31H460 6 C44H53N 014 . 546.701 819.903 C31H4608 isocyclic C44H53NO1 4 heterocychc T NHMSEMKT DAYSGWHIQOLQNM SA-N USNOOZXS AYFCEXQOWVITF SA-N SA-N SXPIMOCR RJUHJYMNLIZOKAS A-N 1 T U . 11923 Identification(3) Physical Data(1) Spectra(7) Bioactivity/Ecotox(4) Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. Japane yew Takus 5 5 ddts S1064 Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.; Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View in Reaxys Journal; Sugiyama, Takeyoshi; Oritani, Takayuki; Oritani, Takashi; Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry; vol. 58; 10; (1994); p. - 1924; View in Reaxys Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxys 00 7613305 View3in taxuspin V; in taxuspine V Reaxys ""ew 0 00r C30H420 13 610.656 C30142013 heterocyclic 610.656 C30142013 heterocyclic KLIDFAOXP Identification(5) CGARX- Physica at() RRHJOLCQ Physical Data(4) SA-N Spectra(8) 1 5 HO 0 """ 7 3 V7ewin taxuspin V; 7613305 Reaxys 7613305 taxuspin V; View in taxuspin v taxuspine V C30H420 C301-420 C3 13 610.656 C30H42013 heterocyclic KLIDFAOXP CGARXRRHJOLCQ SAN Joumal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; 1111 vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. - 1134; View in Reaxys KLIDFAOXP CGARXCRXRRHJOLCQ SA-N Joumal; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Inubushi, Akiko; Katsui, Takie; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Tetrahedron; vol. 52; 41; (1996); p. 13145 - 13150; View in Reaxys 2a,5a,100-tracetoxy-14p7672134 isobutyryloxy-4(20),1 1C30H440 View in taxadiene; 8 Rexs2a,5a,10s-triacetoxy-140Reaxys isobutyryloxytaxa-4(20), 11diene UXTLOYZKA 532.675 C30H4408 isocyclic VGZJOldentification(6) ATYYVORY Bioactivity/Ecotox(5) SA-N 532.675 C30H4408 isocyclic Joumal; Bai, Jiao; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Toyoizumi, Kazuki; Fu, Liwei; Zhang, Shujun; Dai, Jungui; Sakai, Junichi; Hirose, Katutoshi; Yamori, Takao; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Joumal of Natural Products; vol. 67; 1; (2004); p. 58 - 63; View in Reaxys c UXTLOYZKA VGZJOATYYVORY SA-N Joumal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.; Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View in Reaxys diene 2a,5a,10p3-triacetoxy-14p7672134 sobutyryloxy-4(20),1 1C30H440 View in taxadiene; 2asa,5 0-triacetoxy-14p8 Reaxys isobutyryloxytaxa-4(20),1 1diene 532.675 C30H440 5 Joumal; Bai, Jiao; Ito, Nobuhide; Sakai, Junichi; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Fujisawa, Hajime; Bai, Liming; Dai, Jungui; Zhang, Shujun; Hirose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Joumal of Natural Products; vol. 68; 4; (2005); p. 497 - 501; View in Reaxys UXTLOYZKA VGZJOATYYVORY SA-N 2a,5a,1 0s-triacetoxy-14p7672134 isobutyryloxy-4(20),1 1C30H440 View in taxadiene; 8 Vewy'~2a,5a,10p-triacetoxy-14pReaxys isobutyryloxytaxa-4(20),1 1- Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.; Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View in Reaxys ic Copyright @2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. Rem of IoWABUTQVF Vie in taxuspine G Reaxys 0 - C24H340 163979-22. 7434.53 C24H3407 isocyclic cuspiata Sieb. at IIO H uc H OH H 2a,5a,1 0p-tracetoxy-taxa4(20),11-diene; 2a,5a,10s-triacetoxy9449731 4(20),11-taxadieneView in 2a,5a,10p-triacetoxytaxaReax 420)11-diene; 0 C26H380 444307-63 6 5 446.584 C26H3806 isocyclic SWONFRKO CZLVGRFIXWLCJPS A-N identification(8) Physical Data(2) Spectra(6) Bioactivity/Ecotox(10) 2a,5a,9a,100,140p 1IDOQ-Pyia 7655 pentaacetoxy-taxa-4(20),1 dKim, 7675957 C301-420 View in diene; 10 2a,5a,9a,10p,140Reaxys pentaacetoxytaxa-4(20), 11- ousodat 25 5 (P93AF Taxus x media ev. suspenion ceu *uues 562.657 C301-42010 isocyclic MDPMMMY Identification(5) aa3 R YMJH- Pscal(9) () ZARNYMJH Spectra(9) Bioactivity/Ecotox(1) SA-N Hid Te 0 o o 5a-hydroxy-70,9a,10pView in Reaxys triacetoxy-4(20),11(12)taxadien-13-one; taxuspinanane K Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.; Qiu, Deyou; You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View in Reaxys Ta z.s moda eg diene 0 Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.;Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901910; View in Reaxys ofTaus 4_ deacetoxytaxuyunnanine C oo Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxys Japanese Identification(5) TDOH- Physical Data(2) YCPIXCPXS Spectra(1) A-N Bioactivity/Ecotox(8) C26H360 198631-40 8 2 476.567 C26H3608 isocyclic NRJCBPQE LYLDFNVCTMJJASS A-N Identification(6) Physical Data(1) Spectra(6) Bioactivity/Ecotox(2) 0Journal; 14 Morita, Hiroshi; Gonda, Akira; Wei, Lan; Yamamura, Yukinori; Wakabayashi, Hideki; et al.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 48; 5; (1998); p. 857 - 862; Viewin Reaxys T 4 'OH H Ji 8028189 View in Reaxys taxinine E 8028189 View in taxinine E Reaxye C37H460 10 C37H460 10 650.766 650.766 C37H46010 C37H46010 isocyclic isocyclic XBKVZMYB Identification() DASNNMX Physical Data(1) Bioactivity/Ecotox(1) SA-N XBKVZMYB DANNSuAp-dat SA-N Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected by Elsevier Properties SA and used under license. . 1 4 4 yew Tas -Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita 0.; Canadian of Chemistry; vol. 81;1; Journal (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Journal; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Wang, Xiaoxia; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Sudo, Yojiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters; vol. 8; 812; (1998); p. 1555 - 1558; View in Reaxys 0 H 2a,9a,100,13a-tetraacetoxy 8094274 taxa-4(20),11 -dien-5o-ol; C28H400 218937-151 520.62 View in 5-decinnamoyltaxinine E; Reaxys 2-acetyltaxinine E C28H4009 isocyclic UVSUZWKQ LMVQVCTSKXOI-Z SA-N heterocyclic OUZGCGZM ZBOCBHBTJWADHW SA-N Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Oritani, Takayuki; Horiguchi, Tohru; Sugiyama, Takeyoshi; Murakami, Ryo; Yamada, Teiko; Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry; vol. 63; 5; (1999); p. 924 - 929; View in Reaxys HK 0 [8 6 6826 View in Reaxys 7-epi-10deacetyltaxuyunnanine 7152991 View in Reaxys 2-deacetyl-5-decinnamoyltaxinine E; C26H380 28 deacetydecinnamoyltaxinin e 7403605 Vew in Reaxys Reaxys C44H55N 013 7,2'didesacetoxyaustrospicatin 37H51N 72 C37H510 e 805.92 478.583 C44H55NO1 3 C26H3808 isocyclic C37H51N8 socyclic E 637.814 Identification(3) Physical Data(2) Spectra(6) Bioactivity/Ecotox(1) Journal; Morita, Hiroshi; Gonda, Akira; Wei, Lan; Yamamura, Yukinori; Wakabayashi, Hideki; et al. Planta Medica; vol. 64; 2; (1998); p. 183 - 186; View n Reaxvs 3 JTBBGPIYD SKLLQIdentification (5) FECRNSTJS Physical Data(2) A-N Spectra(5) A-N 3 Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita 0.; Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys CBAKLDDY Identification(5) QIIIJTPhysical Data(5) CODWPZBD Spectra(3) 3 Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; SA-N Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxys Bioactivity/Ecotox(7) I 7455224 View in taxuspine K "e Reaxys View in Reaxys taxuspine K C30H420 201YBASNLMA 7455224GTJOVEHIH 130420 13 610.656 C30H42013 heterocyclic 610.656 C30H42013 heterocyclic GTJOVEHIH Identification(4) MYRMR- Physical Data(1) Spectra(6) SA-N Bioactivity/Ecotox(7) MYRMR-A YBASNLMA SA-N Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. 3 Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxys Journal; Wang, Xiao-xia; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Kobayshi, Jun'ichi; Tetrahedron; vol. 52; 7; (1996); p. 2337 - 2342; View in Reaxys Journal; Bai, Jiao; Ito, Nobuhide; Sakai, Junichi; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Fujisawa, Hajime; Bai, Liming; Dai, Jungui; Zhang, Shujun; Hirose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 68; 4; (2005); p. 497 - 501; View in Reaxys Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111- 1134; View in Reaxys Journal; Wang, Xiao-xia; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Tetrahedron; vol. 52; 37; (1996); p. 12159 - 12164; View in Reaxys Journal; Kosugi, Katsuhiko; Sakai, Jun-ichi; Zhang, Shujun; Watanabe, Yusuke; Sasaki, Hirofumi; Suzuki, Toshio; Hagiwara, Hisahiro; Hirata, Naonori; Hirose, Katutoshi; Ando, Masayoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 54; 8; (2000); p. 839 - 846; View in Reaxys Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Wang, Xiaoxia; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Sudo, Yojiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Bloorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters; vol. 8; 812; (1998); p. 1555 - 1558; View ?n Reaxys Journal; Wang, Xiao-xia; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 61; 4; (1998); p. 474 - 479; View in Reaxys Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. 0 O Ao o k 8046312 taxezopidine A; View in taxezopidine Reaxys taxezopidine C26H360 9 492.566 | C26H3609 OFABTNFZ WMLARJFDRWJUCO SA-N isocyclic ldentification(4) Physical Data(2) Spectra(4) Bioactivity/Ecotox(1) 1I Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Wang, Xiaoxia; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Sudo, Yojiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters; vol. 8; 812; (1998); p. 1555 - 1558; View in Reaxys 3 O i 0 .OFABTNFZ 8046312 View in taxezopidine A; Reaxys taxezopidine C26H360 9 492.566 C26H3609 Journal; Wang, Xiao-xia; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Tetrahedron Letters; vol. 38; 43; (1997); p. 7587 - 7588; View in Reaxys WMLARJFDRWJUCO SA-N isocyclic H e N-mety -paclitaxel; C481-153N 8797C48H53NO1 heeoccicJTWBC Reaxys ) 8300796 4-DAB; Il: View in 10-deacetylbaccatin Il Reaxys 4-deacetylbaccatin III 5a-hydroxytaxa9428505 4(20),11(12)-diene; View in 5o-hydroxytaxa-4(20),1 1. = UATZAEJDB Identification(5) Pyscl 1Data(3) SA-N C29H36O 189006-03 10 9 C20H320 ~ 544.599 288.473 2H61 eeoylcUHFPHEC29H36010 heterocyclic C20H320 2 Journal; Kawamura, Fumio; Kikuchi, Yoshinari; Ohira, Tatsuro; Yatagai, Mitsuyoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 62; 2; (1999); p. 244 247; View in Reaxys KRLGUZQQ ZHPRIASZS A-N QHDGSWA QHGWA Identification(6) ZNWaP Spectra(3) v iatvy/coxl A-N isocyclic Reaxys diene; Htaxa-4(20),11(12)-dien-5-ol OH 3 Bioactivity/Ecotox(1) Journal; Morita, Hiroshi; Gonda, Akira; Wei, Lan; Yamamura, Yukinori; Wakabayashi, Hideki; et al.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 48; 5; (1998); p. 857 - 862; View in Reaxys 3 Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.;Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View in Reaxys 3 Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.; Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View in Reaxys H I 9460766 9-dihydrobaccatine 111; Ri60ax s7r6xat6l Reaxys hydroxybaccatin 11 NIAII NEAUUILPX C31H400 588.652 C31H40011 heterocyclic FOJJES Identification(5) A-N Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected by Elsevier Properties SA and used under license. 2 C37H49N 09 6837816 View in taxine II Reaxys 2a,5a,9a-trihydroxy7150289 10,1 3a-diacetyl-taxaC24H360 view ii 4(20),11-diene; Re7DvF 2", 10P,1 3a-diacetoxy-4(20),11 diene oH 0 O H 651.797 436.546 C37H49NO9 C24H3607 isocyclic isocyclic UJARNTWL SVMUJF- Identification(5) QVKFSLQV Bioactivity/Ecotox(6) SA-N QBIXMFOV Identification(5) MVUJGG- Physical Data(1) Spectra(5) SA-N 2 stems of the Japamse yew Taxus cuspdata Sieb. et Zucc. Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Ogiwara, Aya; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Yoshida, Naotoshi; et al.; Tetrahedron; vol. 50; 25; (1994); p. 7401 - 7416; View in Reaxvs Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita 0.; Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; 2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys 2 Si(bet Zucc. H OH OH 7238395 70-acetoxytaxinine; View in taxuspine F Reaxys C28H380 10 C37H440 7242009 View in taxinine B Reaxys 7788786 77878 View in taxuspine ZLTHGSNFJS Reaxys C37H51N 534.604 664.75 60 653.813 C28H38010 isocyclic SLJNSLIEGI NNEEYIRYCUEJS A-N C3744011 C37H51N09 isocyclic Ohe Japanese yew Tagte cusidta CWMUWKW ZNUFEDYLZBAJJJLSA N Identification(4) Physical Data(2) Spectra(4) Bioactivity/Ecotox(1) fI cullidala. stemKof X B jXiao-xia; Yew CKXBHBNB EFREKTTGNJWo A-N Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Inubushi, Akiko; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Yoshida, Naotoshi; Sasaki, Takuma; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Tetrahedron; vol. 51; 21; (1995); p. 5971 - 5978; View in Reaxys Journal; Konda, Yaeko; Sasaki, Tomomitsu; Sun, Xue-Long; Li, Xian; Onda, Masayuki; et al.; Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin; vol. 42; 12; (1994); p. 2621 - 2624; View in Reaxys Journal; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Wang, Yoshida, Naotoshi; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin;8 vol. 45; 7; (1997); p. 1205 - 120 ; View in Reaxys 7844183 VCewin taxuspinanane D Reaxys ( 11 RGHsAN 586.636 C31H38011 heterocyclic GERGUKHE ldentification(3) ZFJMEB- Physical Data( ) pactivity /Eoox1 A-N Bioactivity/Ecotox(1) Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected by Elsevier Properties SA and used under license. T -us 2 Zuc.R r Journal; Morita, Hiroshi; Gonda, Akira; Wei, Lan; Yamamura, Yukinori; Wakabayashi, Hideki; et al.; Planta Medica; vol. 64; 2; (1998); p. 183 - 186; View in Reaxys View in Reaxys HO 786822C29H360 taxuspinane C 7963663 View in 2-deacetyl-taxinine J Reaxvs 10 10 544.599 VGYGMYOF Identification(3) CJDRPE- Physical Data(2) UCLEH PScra()2 UANCLEHB Spectra(5) SA-N Bioactivity/Ecotox(2) Journal; Morita, Hiroshi; Wei, Lan; Gonda, Akira; Takeya, Koichi; Itokawa, Hideji; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 46; 3; (1997); p. 583 586; View in Reaxys isocyclic DACUFYMH APJQQBVUPYCHFM SA-N Journal; Morita, Hiroshi; Gonda, Akira; Wei, Lan; Yamamura, Yukinori; Wakabayashi, Hideki; et al.; Planta Medica; vol. 64; 2; (1998); p. 183 - 186; View in Reaxys C22H13206 isocyclic DFVNOLZAL KWQCQM MGMIPAKD SA-N C22H3206 isocyclic C29H36010 heterocyclic C37H460 666.766 C37H46011 OH0 H 8013066 View in Vie in6 Reaxys C22H320 6392.492 lPK Identification(3) Physical Data(1) Spcr()2 Spectra(5) Bioactivity/Ecotox(1) OH Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Wang, Xiaoxia; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Sudo, Yojiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters; vol. 8; 812; (1998); p. 1555 - 1558; View in Reaxys H OH OH 0 8013086 Vew in Reaxys C22H320 6 392.492 Journal; Wang, Xiao-xia; Shigemon, Hideyuki; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 61; 4; (1998); p. 474 - 479; View in Reaxys DFVNOLZAL M QCQ MGMIPAKD -N 'OH H H OH 8023236 View in C31H3808 isocyclic LACLKGVXI BAENIUDMFJDJZS UDFDZ A-N C31 H3808 isocyclic LACLKGVXI BAENIUDMFJDJZS A-N C31H380 V8 f 8538.638 Reaxys 1 "8023236 View in Reaxys 031 H380 8 6 538.638 ldentification(3) Physical Data(1) Spectra(6) pcr()2 Bioactivity/Ecotox(1) Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected by Elsevier Properties SA and used under license. Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Wang, Xiaoxia; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Sudo, Yojiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters; vol. 8; 812; (1998); p. 1555 - 1558; View in Reaxys Journal; Wang, Xiao-xia; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 61; 4; (1998); p. 474 - 479; View in Reaxys 8024272 View in C28H400 10 8024272 in Reaxys C28H400 1Y 536.62 536.62 C28H40010 C28H40010 Identification(3) Physical Data(1) Spectra(6) Bioactivity/Ecotox(1) FUBMOVYE QAHKMAWDKHEYHY SA-N isocyclic FUBMyew A KView A SA-N as U4L " bt zutc, YCZNPMNC GXWNH- Identification(3) UFJLMRSIS Spectra(3) A-N Bav/ t2 JapantoB ycccJalSI 2 O HO HOW- stems of 8025976 View in Reaxys baccatin VI; taxuspine E C31H400 11 taxine liI0 Reaxys C37H49N 09 588.652 C31H40011 heterocyclic 8 --- Japanese yew Taxus isocyclic 8092 View in Reaxys 8032220 ewin 8098426 View in Reaxys taxol deacetyl-2- 6 651.797 C37H49NO9 C47H53N C47H53NO1 013 3 isocychic 2 cu 1 608.729 C35H4409 YLUDIAFITL RBKTIdentification(4) ATRXLRSR Bioactivity/Ecotox(6) isocyclic Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected by Elsevier Properties SA and used under license. Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxys Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Wang, Xiaoxia; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Sudo, Yojiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Bloorganic Medicinal Chemistry Letters; vol.8; (1998); p. 1555 - 1558; View in Reaxys SA-N812; C35H440 Journal; Wang, Xiao-xia; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 61; 4; (1998); p. 474 - 479; View in Reaxys Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; 14 vL4;2 19) p..11 1111-1134; 47; 2; (1998); View in Reaxys UJARNTWL SVMUJFHHNKTFFCCvol. SA-N SOSLCGUO SOSLCGUO Identification(4) OOQMEN- Physical Data(2) Spectra(9) SA-N Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Wang, Xiaoxia; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Sudo, Yojiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Bloorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters; vol. 8; 812; (1998); p. 1555 - 1558; View in Reaxys Japaese yew Tus 1 2 cussidol S10b.4a Journal; Wang, Xiao-xia; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 61; 4; (1998); p. 474 - 479; View in Reaxys View in baccatin Il 13-cinnamate; taxuspinanane J C40H440 12 716782 heterocyclic .044012 Reaxys View in Reaxys taxezopidine J 10 622.712 C35H42010 isocyclic Journal; Morita, Hiroshi; Gonda, Akira; Wei, Lan; Yamamura, Yukinori; Wakabayashi, Hideki; at al. Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 48; 5; (1998); p. 857 - 862; View in Reaxys PPZXDJGR UOJEBODILUHENS A-N CEAAWQZV Identification(5) SFASVNLVS Spectra(7) A-N 1 2 Bioactivity/Ecotox(1) Journal; Shi, Qing-wen; Oritani, Takayuki; Zhao, Ding; Murakami, Ryo; Oritani, Takashi; Planta Medica vol. 66; 3; (2000); p. 294 - 299; View n Reaxys 8246897CEAQV Vie2in68972 C3 1140 824889 taxezopidine J 9888672 2-deacetyltaxine B; View in 1-extxn Reaxys 9973850taxinine NN-11; V i 5a,13 acet 9Reaxys cinnamoyloxy-4(20), taxadien-1013-al C35H42010 isocyclicSF A-N 9434037 5a-acetoxytaxaView in 4(20),11(12)-diene; Reaxys 5a-acetoxytaxa-4(20),1 1diene -_\ 622.712 Journal; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Sakurai, Cecilia A.; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Kobayashi, Akio; Kajiyama Shinichiro; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Tetrahedron; vol. 55; 9; (1999); p. 2553 - 2558; View in Reaxys CEAAWQZV SISBFIVN V APIZAZFFQ C22H340 2 330.511 C22H3402 C33H45N 75773C34N7 567.723 C33H45NO7 isocyclic socyclic ioylcQRQAICDM BVSJAIdeniatiiation(4) ZJDLJICXSA Bioactivity/Ecotox(1) N 2 BJUSJVLOC QRPldentification(4) Spectra(3)2 2 SA-N GJHAFDSY - C33H420 7SA-N 550.692 C33H4207 isocyclic CIJBTOSA-N Identification(5) Physical Data(2) Bictit/ox4 Bioactivity/Ecotox(44) Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. 1 2 Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.; Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View in Reaxys Joumal; Morita, Hiroshi; Machida, Izumi; Hirasawa, Yusuke; Kobayashi, Junichi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 68; 6; (2005); p. 935 - 937; View in Reaxys Journal; Dai, Jungui; Bai, Jiao; Hasegawa, Toshiaki; Nishizawa, Shigenori; Sakai, Junichi; Oka, Seiko; Kiuchi, Miwa; H-irose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Li, Minjie; Ando, Masayoshi; Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin; vol. 54; 3; (2006); p. 306 - 309; View in Reaxys Journal; Bai, Jiao; Kitabatake, Mutumi; Toyoizumi, Kazuki; Fu, Liwei; Zhang, Shujun; Dai, Jungui; Sakai, Junichi; Hirose, Katutoshi; Yamori, Takao; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Ando, Masayoshi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 67; 1; (2004); p. 58 - 63; View inReaxys Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Inubushi, Akiko; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Yoshida, Naotoshi; Sasaki, Takuma; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Tetrahedron; vol. 51; 21; (1995); p. 5971 - 5978; View in Reaxys Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Inubushi, Akiko; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Yoshida, Naotoshi; Sasaki, Takuma; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Tetrahedron; vol. 51; 21; (1995); p. 5971 - 5978; View in Reaxys Journal; Konda, Yaeko; Sasaki, Tomomitsu; Sun, Xue-Long; Li, Xian; Onda, Masayuki; et al.; Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin; vol. 42; 12; (1994); p. 2621 - 2624; View in Reaxys Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Katsui, Takie; Yoshida, Naotoshi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Tetrahedron; vol. 52; 15; (1996); p. 5391 - 5396; View in Reaxys Journal; Morita, Hiroshi; Gonda, Akira; Wei, Lan; Yamamura, Yukinori; Takeya, Koichi; Itokawa, Hideji; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 60; 4; (1997); p. 390 - 392; View in Reaxys Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. View in Reaxys C26H360 492.566 C26H3609 isocyclic HMVNDOFA GCGZSA- Identification(3) SZMFXVPE Bioactivity/Ecotox(3) SA-N Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111- 1134; View in Reaxys Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Wang, Xiaoxia; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Sudo, Yojiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters; vol. 8; 812; (1998); p. 1555 - 1558; View in Reaxys Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Heterocycles: vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxvs Reaxys9 No -f 8068in View in Reaxys C31H400 10 8028577 View in Reaxys C37H51N 09 572.653 C31H40010 heterocyclic BKASSTPDS ANLBHIdentification(3) QDIXYBMO Bioactivity/Ecotox(1) SA-N 653.813 C37H51NO9 isocyclic CKXBHBNB EFREKT- Identification(3) WOZIFEKR Bioactivity/Ecotox(3) SA-N N' yI 8ea81 80ewin Reaxys C37H4606 8029363 View in Reaxys C37H49N 10 11A-N 666.766 C37H4601 667.797 C37H49NO1 0 C47H61N View in Reaxys C47H61NO1 48 isocyclic isocyclic NOMGXQG PVDHIQV- Identification(3) LUAYAUSYS Bioactivity/Ecotox(1) Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Wang, Xiaoxia; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Sudo, Yojiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Bloorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters; vol. 8; 812; (1998); p. 1555 - 1558; View in Reaxys GODKREDP NCAIKTIdenatiiation(3)) GLACRUIJS Bioactivity/Ecotox(3) A-N Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Shigemori, Hideyuk; Heterocycles; vol. 47; 2; (1998); p. 1111 - 1134; View in Reaxys CXIWJTIMC KBSGLIdentificaion(3) heterocyclicYSRBHRHJ Bioactivity/Ecotox() SA-N Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Wang, Xiaoxia; Shigemori, Hideyuki; Sudo, Yojiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters; vol. 8; 812; (1998); p. 1555 - 1558; View in Reaxys 8032473sxia; SC49H57N83.99 4 014 Reaxys 8375198 View in Journal; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Hosoyama, Hirokazu; Wang, XiaoShigemori, Hideyuki; Sudo, Yojiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters; vol. 8; 812; (1998); p. 1555 - 1558; View in Reaxys YPZNPHSH heterocyclic eGBZQRDBJ VAAKID- dentification(3) Bioactivity/Ecotox(1) Taxus cupIAta S- 10-deacetyl taxinine C33H400 8 564.676 C33H4008 isocyclic NReaxys 8380704 2a,7p,9a,10-13aView i pentaacetopox5aReaxys taxa-11-en-1p-ol 8529978 View in 2'-hydroxytaxinine Reaxys 8530690 V ew in 5-cinnamoyltaxicinR triacetate Reaxys C39H480 C 0 740.802 622.712 C39H48014 heterocyclic C35H42010 isocyclic Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Oritani, Takayuki; Horiguchi, Tohru; Sugiyama, Takeyoshi; Murakami, Ryo; Yamada, Teiko; Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry; vol. 63; 5; (1999); p. 924 - 929; View in Reaxys MQONWRW Identification(4) Physical Data(1) WlLKJHV AYFFSUKU Spectra(5) SA-N Identification(4) GJVCWSHM Physical Data(1) SHM Spectra(4) SA-N ILYLIAD SXVIQA-N 1 Ywvol. Journal; Murakami, Ryo; Shi, Qingwen; Oritani, Takayuki; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 52; 8; (1999); p. 1577 - 1580: View in Reaxys Identification1(3) AQFTYVHS C37H440 11 664.75 C37H44011 isocyclic Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Oritani, Takayuki; Horiguchi, Tohru; Sugiyama, Takeyoshi; Murakami, Ryo; Yamada, Teiko; Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry; 63; 5; (1999); p. 924 - 929; View in Reaxys -Ywen; ESKJCL- Identification(3) PXCVUNBY SA-N 1 Journal; Murakami, Ryo; Shi, QingOritani, Takayuki; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 52; 8; (1999); p. 1577 - 1580; View in Reaxys Seeds Of Tm 8602102 2o,9a,10s-triacetoxy-5aView in cinnamoxy-taxa-4(20),11Reaxys dien-13a-ol C35H44 C 608.729 C35H4409 QG SG Identification(4) A-N Physical Data(1) Spectra(6) isocyclic Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected by Elsevier Properties SA and used under license. 1 Journal; Shi, Qing-wen; Oritani, Takayuki; Zhao, Ding; Murakami, Ryo; Oritani, Takashi; Planta Medica; vol. 66; 3; (2000); p. 294 - 299; View 2a,7,9a,10p-tetraacetoxy- C39H51N 86047095a2RSN,N-dimethyl-3 View in phenylisoseryloxy]-taxa012 Reaxys phnlssrlx]tx02Spectra(7) 4(20),11-dien-13-one 8667257 5a-cinnamoyl-2a,9a,100View in triacetoxy-taxa-4(20),11Reaxys diene-10,70-diol C351420 11 8668050 5a-cinnamoyl-2a,70,9a,100 C37H440 Viewin tetraacetoxy-taxa-4(20)C,1112 Reaxys diene-1p-ol 0 725.833 C39H51NO1 2 isocyclic SA-N 638.712 680.749 C35H42011 C37H44012 562.657 C30H42010 Journal; Shi, Qing-wen; Oritani, Takayuki; Zhao, Ding; Murakami, Ryo; Oritani, Takashi; Planta Medica; vol. 66; 3; (2000); p. 294 - 299; View in Reaxys isocyclic NTSFDQOX Identification(4) BNSSLPPKS Physical Data(1) A-N Spectra(6) Journal; Cheng, Qian; Oritani, Takayuki; Horiguchi, Tohru; Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry; vol. 64; 4; (2000); p. 894 - 898; View in Reaxys isocyclic YMFGFUWV CZQVCH- Identification(4) WMHRXNFP Physical Data(1) Spectra(6) SA-N Journal; Cheng, Qian; Oritani, Takayuki; Horiguchi, Tohru; Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry; vol. 64; 4; (2000); p. 894 - 898; View in Reaxys , C301-1420 9457945 2o,709a.100,13aView in pentaacetoxytaxa-4(20),1110 Reaxys diene ASLJYTZPFI AOCTIdentification(4) KGCHRQTP Physical Data(1) isocyclic Identification(4) Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.; Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View in Reaxys Identification(4) Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.; Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View in Reaxys YMXDEIJJS LDGPB- Identification(4) FVKBLHKFS Spectra(3) A-N Journal; Ketchum, Raymond E. B.; Rithner, Christopher D.; Qiu, Deyou; Kim, You Sun; Williams, Robert M.; Croteau, Rodney B.; Phytochemistry (Elsevier); vol. 62; 6; (2003); p. 901 910; View in Reaxys CHNIJRUMA IIJKNKTXPPAN SA-N H WPPPFZJN 9-dihydro-13-acetylbaccatine 1i1 R ReaxysSAN 9462524 5a,70,9a,100,13aView in pentaacetoxy-2abenzoyloxytaxa-4(20),1 1eaxys diene C33H420 12 C37H460 12 630.689 682.765 C33H42012 heterocyclic C37H46012 isocyclic KLMYBWXHMZMNHP SA-N Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. \ 9536547 2a,5a,9a,100-tetraacetoxyView in 13a-(Z)-cinnamoyloxy-taxa4(20),11-diene 9539252 taxa-4(20),1 -diene-2a,5adiacetate-14p-(2'S,3'R)-3'Venhydroxy-2'-methyl-butyrateReaxys hdo--me s10-p-D-glucoside 37H460 0Rexys 0SAN 650.766 C37H46010 C35H540 1368.0 682.806COURTPG3H41 2283 7--xylosyl)-10954223 View in Ra deacetyltaxol dect o C50H57N 01 9 23 7-(p-xylosyl)-10\5 deacetyltaxol C Viewxin9803 C49H63N 017 isocyclic heeoylcYPST VPIDEXLSMI Identification(4) AAAD BUVRCVSP Physical Data(1) Spectra(4) utiTngs 1 oJournal; B M MNAQWBY Identification(4) P hsiaDta) Spectra(7) AY A-N e - ArooNted 4.9 C50H57NO1 eeoylcAQKP AGABNGYO Identification(4) EYYERMpcr()Orval; 1vZ 0SA-N C49H63NO1 eactyltxolC V ewin 93.03 7 07 heeroccli eercci [PJournal; MLIMHVPG XGHTNR- Identification(4) Spctr(4)Orval; GPYCBB GPTYCBBU Spectra(4) C33H420 550.692 C33H4207 isocyclic d tShigenori; Physicat(4) O DL ) scra( ARASHVSR Bioactivity/Ecotox(4) SA-N niesdes of Tas 10632922 2a,9a,10s-triacetoxytaxaC32H460 View in 4(20),11-dien-13-one-5a-013 Reaxys p-D-glucopyranoside 638.709 C32H46013 heterocyclic OUZIYNFF WIKDCK- Identification(4) MSFHKKQR Physical Data(1) SA-N S yae Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected byElsevier Properties SA and used under license. Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita .; Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, nd roa Zamir, Lolita 0.; Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Tracy L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, Zamir, Lolita 0.; Canadian 81; 1; offCeity Chemistry; vol. Journal Jua o.8;1 (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys 0RLP 10404510 5a,13a-diacetoxy-1 OViewin cinnamoyloxy-4(20),11Reaxys taxadien-9a-ol Journal; Shi, Qing-Wen; Petzke, Mf Tracy L.; Sauriol, Francoise; Mamer, Orval; Zamir, Lolita 0.; Canadian Journal of Chemistry; vol. 81; 1; (2003); p. 64 - 74; View in Reaxys 414 Spectra(3) Journal; Dai, Jungui; Bai, Jiao; Hasegawa, Toshiaki; Nishizawa, Sakai, Junichi; Oka, Seiko; Kiuchi, Miwa; Hirose, Katutoshi; Tomida, Akihiro; Tsuruo, Takashi; Li, Minjie; Ando, Masayoshi; Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin; vol. 54; 3; (2006); p. 306 - 309; View Journal; Li, Ligeng; Cao, Congmei; Huo, Changhong; Zhang, Manli; Shi, Qingwen; Kiyota, Hiromasa; Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry; vol. 43; 6; (2005); p. 475 - 478; View in Reaxys 11195631 2a,14p-diacetoxy-1001OH Viewin ethoXytaxa-11,4(20)-dienReaxys 5a-ol H C26H400 448.6 C26H4006 CCONFRZG Identification(4) SFPMZPPX Physical Data(1) SA-N Spectra(4) 1 Journal; Dong, Mei; Zhang, Man-Li; Wang, Yu-Fang; Zhang, Xi-Ping; Li, Cun-Fang; Shi, Qing-Wen; Cong, Bin; Kiyota, Hiromasa; Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry; vol. 71; 8; (2007); p. 2087 - 2090; View in Reaxvs 1 Journal; Dong, Mei; Zhang, Man-Li; Wang, Yu-Fang; Zhang, Xi-Ping; Li, Cun-Fang; Shi, Qing-Wen; Cong, Bin; Kiyota, Hiromasa; Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry; vol. 71; 8; (2007); p. 2087 - 2090; View in Reaxys o -o SSLBZFDBG ldnilain4 " OH H H 11195632 2a,14p-diacetoxy-100C View in methoxytaxa-11,4(20)-dienReaXys Sa-ol Identification(4) 8LPC6 434.573 C25H3806 6QTYJYIDZS AYIPCA Physical Data(1) Pyia aa1 Spectra(2) oy 0 F- 0 OH 11195633 111956332a-acetoxy-10p-ethoxytaxa. C24H380 View in 11,4(20)-diene-5a,14-diol Reaxy C 'A-N H Rexys 406.563 C24H3805 BNHGKUO WYJNWNFXHNBIOFNS A-N ldentification(4) Pdniicat(4) Physical Data(1) Spectra(4) Journal; Dong, Mei; Zhang, Man-Li; Wang, Yu-Fang; Zhang, Xi-Ping; Li, Cun-Fang; Shi, Qing-Wen; Cong, Bin; Kiyota, Hiromasa; Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry; vol. 71; 8; (2007); p. 2087 -2090; View in Reaxys C22H3407 ZRWDUMZ SA-N Identification(4) Physical Data(1) Spectra(4) 1 Journal; Huo, Changhong; Su, Xiaohui; Li, Xing; Zhang, Xiping; Li, Cunfang; Wang, Yufang; Shi, Qingwen; Kiyota, Hiromasa; Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry; vol. 45; 6; (2007); p. 527 - 530; View inReaxys 1 Journal; Morita, Hiroshi; Machida, Izumi; Hirasawa, Yusuke; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Joumal of Natural Products; vol. 68; 6; (2005); p. 935 - 937; View in Reaxys OH 0 o OH OH 11296427 2a,5a,7p,9a,13aC23OW View in pentahydroxy-100C22H340 Reaxys acetoxytaxa-4(20),11-diene H 410.508 OH 15840365 View in 2-0-deacety taxine II Reaxys 15840366 * 10 taxezopidine M ieax i010 Reaxys C35H47N 08 609.76 C35H47NO8 YDXFVDIGL VDFPLd DYDWKSLW Identification(3) SA-N C37H49N 667.797 C37H49NO1 0 GOESCWO Identification(4) GMSFPPK- Physical Data(1) CFGDUKOB Spectra() SA-N BioactivityfEcotox(2) Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected by Elsevier Properties SA and used under license. Journal; Morita, Hiroshi; Machida, Izumi; Hirasawa, Vusuke; Kobayashi, Junichi; Journal of Natural Products; vol. 68; 6; (2005); p. 935 - 937; View in Reaxys '-'4 15882421 View in taxine NA-13 Reaxys C37H47N 010 010 C37H47NO1 665.781 0 OGLVJVZHL Identification(4) DUNAZPhysical Data(2) DUNAZDKPOKLLXS Spectra(3) 1 the needles and young stemsof Taxus cupdate coected in Abaym-a, Sendai, Japan Journal; Wang, Liyan; Bai, Liming; Tokunaga, Daisuke; Watanabe, Yuusuke; Sakai, Jun-ichi; Tang, Wanxia; Bai, Yuhua; Hirose, Katsutoshi; Ando, Masayoshi; Heterocycles; vol. 75; 4; (2008); p. 911 - 917; View in Reaxys seeds of Taxus > c2 -13817 19381179 View in taxezopidine 0 Reaxys C36H49N 6976C64N9QOAXJO639.786 C36H49NO9 NPGFWXCZ Identification(3) LBYALOOD Physical Data(2) Spectra(9) 1 cuspkfata Sieb. et Zuc4 cofectedat Sapporo, Hokkaido, janw Copyright @ 2010 Elsevier Properties SA. All rights reserved. Authorized use only. Reaxys @ is a trademark owned and protected by Elsevier Properties SA and used under license. Journal; Ishiyama, Haruaki; Kakuguchi, Yuka; Arita, Ed; Kobayashi, Jun'ichi; Heterocycles; vol. 73; c; (2007); p. 341 - 348; View in Reaxys Appendix B: Taxus cDNA library I. Cytochrome P450s a. H1 MDTFIQHESSPLLLSLTLAVILGTILLLILSGKQYRSSRKLPPGNMGFPLIGETIALISDTPR KFIDDRVKKFGLVFKTSLIGHPAVVICGSSANRFLLSNEEKLVRMSLPNAVLKLLGQDCV MGKTGVEHGIVRTALARALGPQALQNYVAKMSSEIEHHINQKWKGKDEVKVLPLIRSL VFSISTSLFFGINDEHQQKRLHHLLETVAMGLVSIPLDFPGTRFRKALYARSKLDEIMSS VIERRRSDLRSGAASSDQDLLSVLVTFKDERGNSFADKEILDNFSFLLHALYDTTISPLT LIFKLLSSSPECYENIAQEQLEILGNKKDREEISWKDLKDMKYTWQAVQETLRMFPPVY GYIREALTDIDYDGYTIPKGWRILCSPHTTHSKEEYFDEPEEFRPSRFEDQGRHVAPYT FIPFGGGLRICAGWEFAKMEILLFMHHFVKTFSHFIPVDPNEKISRDPLPPIPVKGFSIKP FPRS b. H2 MLIEMDTFVQLESSPVLLSLTLTLILLFIFCSKQYRSSLKLPPGNMGFPLIGETIALASQTP DKFFGDRMKKFGKVFKTSLIGHPTIVLCGSSGNRFLLSNEEKLVRMFPPNSSSKLLGQ DSVLGKIGEEHRIVRTALARCLGPQALQNYVSKMSSEIQRHINQKWKGKGEVKMLPLIR SLVFSIATSLFFGITDEQQQERLHHLLETVVTGLLCIPLDFPGTTFRKALHARSKLDEIMS 177 SVIERRRNDLRLGAASSDQDLLSVLLTFKDERGNPFADKEILDNFSFLLHALYDTTISPL TLVFKLVSSNPECYENIAQEQLEILRNKKDGEDISWADLKDMKYTWQAVQETLRMCPP VYGNFRKALTDIHYDGYTIPKGWRILCSPYTTHSKEEYFDDPEKFRPSRFEEQGRDVA PYTFIPFGGGLRICPGREFAKMEILVFMHHFVKAFSSFIPVDPNEKISTDPLPSIPVNGFS INLVPRS c. H3 MDSFSFLKSMEAKFGQVIHRDQSSSTALLSLAFTAAVAIFLVLLFRFKSRPSTNFPPGN FGFPFIGETIQFLRALRSESPHMFFDERLKKFGRVFKTSLTGHPTAVFCGPAGNRFIYS NEHKLVQSSGPNSFVKLVGQQSIVTKTGEEHRIFLGVLNEFLGPHALQSYTPKMSSKIQ ENINKHWKGKDEVNMLPSIRQLVFSISSSLFFDINDEDQQEQLKTLLETILVGTLSVPLDI PGSNFRKALRARSKLDEILSRLIESRRKDMRSGIASTSKNLLSVLLAFKDERGNPLTDTE ILDNFSFMLHASYDTTVSPTVCIFKLLSANPECYEKVVQEQLGILGNKKDGEEMCWNDL KAMKYTWQAAQETMRLFPPAFGSFRKVIADIHHDGYI IPKGWKAMVTNYSTSRKEEYF DEPDNFKPSRFGDGKYVAPYTFLPFGAGIRICPGWEFAKLEMLLFIHHFVKNFSGYLPL DTKEKISGDPFPPLPKNGFPIKLFPRT- d. H4 MDALSLVNSTVAKFNEVTQLQASPAILSTALTAIAGIIVLLVITSKRRSSLKLPPGKLGLPF IGETLEFVKALRSDTLRQFVEEREGKFGRVFKTSLLGKPTVILCGPAGNRLVLSNEEKLL HVSWSAQIARILGLNSVAVKRGDDHRVLRVALAGFLGSAGLQLYIGKMSALIRNHINEK 178 WKGKDEVNVLSLVRDLVMDNSAILFFN IYDKERKQQLHEILKIILASHFGIPLNIPGFLYR KALKGSLKRKKILSALLEKRKDELRSRLASSNQDLLSVLLSFRDERGKPLSDEAVLDNC FAMLDASYDTTTSQMTLILKMLSSNPECFEKVVQEQLEIASNKKEGEEITMKDIKAMKY TWQVLQESLRMLSPVFGTLRKTMNDINHDGYTIPKGWQVVWTTYSTHQKDIYFKQPD KFMPSRFEEEDGHLDAYTFVPFGGGRRTCPGWEYAKVEILLFLHHFVKAFSGYTPTDP HERICGYPVPLVPVKGFPIKLIARS e. H5 MDTIRASFGEVIQPEYSPLIISVALAAFLGIVIFSIFSSTRRSYVNLPPGNLGLPFIGETIQF LGALQSEKPHTFFDERVKKFGKVFKTSLIGDPTVVLCGPAGNRLVLSNEDKLVQSAGP KSFLKLFGEDSVAAKREESHRILRSALGRFLGPHALQNYIGKMNSEMQRHFDDKWKG KDEVKVLPLVRGLIFSIATSLFFNINDDRQREQLHGLLDTILVGSMTIPLNIPGTLFRKAVK ARAKLDEILFALIENRRRELRSGLNSGNQDLLSSLLTFKDEKGNPLTDKEILDNFSVMLH ASYDTTVSPTVLI LKLLASNPECYEKVVQEQLGILASKKEGEEVNWKDLKAMPYTWQAI QEPLRMPPQLLECFEELSLIFSWKAIQFQKDGQLCGQLIVNGREEFFNEPDKFKPSRFE EGKPLDPYTFIPFGAGVRICAGWEFAKAELLLFVHPFVKNFSGCIIIDPNEKISGDPFPPL PTSGQLMKLIPRS f. H6 MDSFNFLRGIGADFGGFIQFQSSPAVLSLSLITTILGVLLLWFFLHKNGSSVTLPPGNLG FPFIGETIPFLRALRSETPQTFFDERVKKFGVVFKTRIVGHPTVVLCGPEGNRFLLSNED 179 KLVQASLPNSSEKLIGKYSILSKRGEEHRILRAALARFLRPQALQGYVAKMSSEIQHHIK QKWKGNDEVKVLPLIRTLIFNIASSLFFGINDEHQQEQLHHLLEAIVLGSLSVPLDFPGT RFRKALDARSKLDEILSSLMESRRRDLRLGTASENQDLLSVLLTFKDERGNPLTDKEIF DNFSFMLHASYDTTVSPTGLMLKLLFSSPDCYEKLVQEQLGIVGNKKEGEEISWNDLK AMKYTCKVVQESMRMLPPVFGSYRKAITYIHYDGYTIPKGWNIFWSPYTTHGKEEYFN EADKFMPSRFEEGKYVAPYTFLPFGAGLRVCPGWEFAKTEILLFVHHFITTFSSYIPIDP KDKISGDPFPPLPTNGFSMKLFTRS- g. H7 MDTLIQIQSSPDFLSFTLTAFLGVVVLLIFRYKHRSALKLPPGNLGLPFIGETITFASQPP QKFLNERGKKFGPVFKTSLIGHPTVVLCGSSGNRFLLSNEEKLVRMSLPNSYMKLLGQ DSLLGKTGQEHRIVRTALGRFLGPQELQNHVAKMSSDIQHHINQKWKGNDEVKVLPLI RNLVFSIATSLFFGINDEHQQERLHLLLETIVMGAVCIPLAFPGSGFRKALQARSELDGIL ISLMKIRRSDLRSGAASSNQDLLSVLLTFKDERGNPLTDKEILDNFSVLLHGLYDTTISPL TLIFKLMSSNTECYENVVQEQLEILSHREKGEEIGWKDLKSMKYTWQAIQETLRMFPPV YGNFRKALTDIHYDGYTIPKGWRVLCSPFTTHSNEEYFNEPDEFRPSRFEGQGKNVPS YTFIPFGGGLRICPGWEFAKTEMLLFIHYFVKTFSSYVPVDPNEKISADPLASFPVNGFS VKLFPRS h. H8 180 MDAFNILKGPAAKLNGVVQLGSYTDRILSITVVAFITILLLLMLRWKSQSSVKLPPGNFG FPLIGETLQLLRAFRSNTTQQFFDERQKKFGCVFKTSLVGERTVVLCGPSGNRLVLAN QNKVVESSWPSAFIKLIGEDSIANTNGEKHRILRAALLRYLGPGSLQNYVGKMRSEIEH HINEKWKGKDEVKVLDLVRKNVFSVATALFFGVNDEERKRIRPPSILRKLHFAGSFSIPL DFPGTSYRRALEARLKLDKILSSLIERRRSDLRSGLASGNEDLVSVLLTFKDEGGNPLT DKEILDNFSGLLHASYDTTTSALTLTFKLMSSSAECYDKVVQEQLRIVSNKKEGEEISLK DLKDMKYTWQVVQETLRMFPPLFGSFRKTIADIQYDGYTIPKGWKVLWATYTTHGRDE YFSEPQKFRPSRFEEGGKHVAPYTFLPFEGGERTCPGYEFSKTHILLFIHQFVKTFTGY IPLDPNESISANPLPPLPANGFPVKLFQRS- i. H9 MDSFIFLRSIGTKFGQLESSPAILSLTLAPILAI ILLLLFRYNHRSSVKLPPGKLGFPLIGETI QLLRTLRSETPQKFFDDRLKKFGPVYMTSLIGHPTVVLCGPAGNKLVLSNEDKLVEME GPKSFMKLIGEDSIVAKRGEDHRILRTALARFLGAQALQNYLGRMSSEIGHHFNEKWK GKDEVKVLPLVRGLIFSIASTLFFDVNDGHQQKQLHHLLETILVGSLSVPLDFPGTRYRK GLQARLKLDEILSSLIKRRRRDLRSGIASDDQDLLSVLLTFRDEKGNSLTDQGILDNFSA MFHASYDTTVAPMALIFKLLYSNPEYHEKVFQEQLEIIGNKKEGEEISWKDLKSMKYTW QAVQESLRMYPPVFGIFRKAITDIHYDGYTIPKGWRVLCSPYTTHLREEYFPEPEEFRP SRFEDEGRHVTPYTYVPFGGGLRTCPGWEFSKIEILLFVHHFVKNFSSYIPVDPNEKVL SDPLPPLPANGFSIKLFPRS 181 j. H10 METKFGQLMQLEFLPFILTPILGALVLLHLFRHRNRSSVKLPPGKLGFPVIGETIQFLRAL RSQTPQKFFDDRVQKFGGVFKTSLIGNPLVVMCGPAGNRLVLSNEDKLVQLEAPNSL MKLMGQDSLLAKRQEDHRTLRAALARFLGPQALQNYMTKISSRTEHHMNEKWKGKD EVRTLPLIRELIFSNASSLFFDINDEHQQERLHHLLEAVVVGSMSIPLDFPGTRLRKALQ ARSKLDEILSSLIKSRRKDLVSGIASDDQDLLSVLLTFKDERGNPLTDKEILDNFSLLLHA SYDTTVSPMVLTLKLLSSN PECYEKVVQEQLGIVANKRIGEEISWKDLKAMKYTWQVV QETLRMFPPLFGSFRKAMVDIDYDGYTIPKGWMILWTTYGTHLREEYFNEPLKFRPSR FEEDGRVTPYTFIPFGGGARTCPGWEFSKTEILLFIHHFVRTFSSYLPVDSNEKISADPF PPLPANGFSIKLSADPFPPLPANGFSIKLFPRSQSN k. H1l MDVFYPLKSTVAKFNECFPAILFIVLSAVAGIVLPLLLFLRSKRRSSVGLPPGKLGYPFIG ESLLFLKALRSNTVEQFLDERVKNFGNVFKTSLIGHPTVVLCGPAGNRLILANEEKLVQ MSWPKSSMKLMGEKSITAKRGEGHMIIRSALQGFFSPGALQKYIGQMSKTIENHINEK WKGNDQVSVVALVGDLVFDISACLFFNINEKHERERLFELLEIIAVGVLAVPVDLPGFAY HRALQARSKLNAILSGLIEKRKMDLSSGLATSNQDLLSVFLTFKDDRGNPCSDEEILDN FSGLLHGSYDTTVSAMACVFKLLSSNPECYEKVVQEQLGILSNKLEGDEITWKDVKSM KYTWQVVQETLRLYPSIFGSFRQAITDIHYNGYIIPKGWKLLWTPYTTHPKEMYFSEPE 182 KFLPSRFDQEGKLVAPYTFLPFGGGQRSCPGWEFSKMEILLSVHHFVKTFSTFTPVDP AEIIARDSLCPLPSNGFSVKLFPRSYSLHTGNQVKKI 1. H12 MDALKQLEVSPSILFVTLAVMAGIILFFRSKRHSSVKLPPGNLGFPLVGETLQFVRSLGS STPQQFIEERMSKFGDVFKTSIIGHPTVVLCGPAGNRLVLSNENKLVQMSWPSSMMKL IGEDCLGGKTGEQHRIVRAALTRFLGPQALQNHFAKMSSGIQRHINEKWKGKDEATVL PLVKDLVFSVASRLFFGITEEHLQEQLHNLLEVILVGSFSVPLNIPGFSYHKAIQARATLA DIMTHLIEKRRNELRAGTASENQDLLSVLLTFTDERGNSLADKEILDNFSMLLHGSYDS TNSPLTMLIKVLASHPESYEKVAQEQFGILSTKMEGEEIAWKDLKEMKYSWQVVQETL RMYPPIFGTFRKAITDIHYNGYTIPKGWKLLWTTYSTQTKEEYFKDADQFKPSRFEEEG KHVTPYTYLPFGGGMRVCPGWEFAKMETLLFLHHFVKAFSGLKAIDPNEKLSGKPLPP LPVNGLPIKLYSRS m. H13 MDSFTFVTIKMGKIWQVIQVEYILSLTLTAILLFFFRYRNKSSHKLPPGNLGFPFIGETIQF LRSLRSQTPEFFFDERVKKFGPVFKTSLIGAPTVIFCGAAGSRLVLSNEDKLVQMESPS SLKKLMGENSILYKREEEHRILRSALSRFLGPQALQTYIAKMSTEIERHINEKWKGKEEV KTLPLIRGLVFSIASSLFFDINDEPQQERLHHHLESLVAGSMAVRLDFPGTRFRKAVEA RSKLDEALHSLIKSRRSDLLSGKASSNQDLLSVLLSFKDERGNPLRDEEILDNFSLILHA SYDTTISPMVLTLKLLSSN PECYDKVVQEQFG ILANKKEGEEISWKDLKAMKYTWQVV 183 QETLRMFPPLFGSFRKAMVDINYDGYTIPKGWIVLWTTYSTHVKEEYFNEPGKFRPSR FEHDGRHVAPYTFLPFGGGLRTCPGWEFSKTEILLFIHHFVKTFGSYLPVDPNEKISAD PFPPLPANGFSIKLFPRS n. H14 MDALYKSTVAKFNEVTQLDCSTESFSIALSAIAGILLLLLLFRSKRHSSLKLPPGKLGIPFI GESFIFLRALRSNSLEQFFDERVKKFGLVFKTSLIGHPTVVLCGPAGNRLILSNEEKLVQ MSWPAQFMKLMGENSVATRRGEDHIVMRSALAGFFGPGALQSYIGKMNTEIQSHINE KWKGKDEVNVLPLVRELVFNISAILFFNIYDKQEQDRLHKLLETILVGSFALPIDLPGFGF HRALQGRAKLNKIMLSLIKKRKEDCSLDRQQPRRICSLFCSLSEMTKGLPHPMDEILDN FSSLLHASYDTTTSPMALIFKLLSSNPECYQKVVQEQLEILSNKEEGEEITWKDLKAMK YTWQVAQETLRMFPPVFGTFRKAITDIQYDGTNSKRGKLLWTTYSTHPKDLYFNEPEK FMPSRFDQEGKHVAPYTFLPFGGGQRSCVGWEFSKMEILLFVH HFVKTFSSYTPVDP DEKISGDPLPPLPSKGFSIKLFPRP o. H15 MDAMDLTVAKFKEFTQLQSSAILLTVVSGIIVIVILLLRSKRRSSLKLPPGKLGLPLIGESL SFLWALRSNTLEQFVDKRVKKYGNVFKTSLLGQPTVVLCGAAGNRLILSNQEKLLSRT VSDRVAKLTGDTSISVIAGDSHRIIRAAVAGFLGPAGLKIHIGEMSAHIRNHINQVWKGK DEVNVLSLARELVFAMSASLFLNINDREEQHQLHKTLETILPGYFSVPINFPGFAFRKAL EGNSKRRKHFSVLQEKRRRDLSVGLASRTQDLLSVLLAYEDDKGNPLTDEEVLDNISA 184 LIDGSYESTSSQMAMLLKLLSDHPECYEKVVQEQLEIASHKKEGEEITWKDVKAMRYT WQVMQETLRMFAPVFGPRGKAITDIHYDGYTIPKGWQLSWATYSTHQNDTYFNEPDK FMPSRFDEEGGRLAPYTFVPFGGGRRKCPGWEFAKTEILLFVHHFVKTFSAYTPIDPH ESIWGRPLPPVPANGFPIKLISRS p. H16 MDALYKSTVAKFNEVTQLDCSTESFSIALSAIAGILLLLLLFRSKRHSSLKLPPGKLGIPFI GESFIFLRALRSNSLEQFFDERVKKFGLVFKTSLIGHPTVVLCGPAGNRLILSNEEKLVQ MSWPAQFMKLMGENSVATRRGEDHIVMRSALAGFFGPGALQSYIGKMNTEIQSHINE KWKGKDEVNVLPLVRELVFNISAILFFNIYDKQEQDRLHKLLETILVGSFALPIDLPGFGF HRALQGRAKLNKIMLSLIKKRKEDLQSGSATATQDLLSVLLTFRDDKGTPLTNDEILDNF SSLLHASYDTTTSPMALIFKLLSSNPECYQKVVQEQLEILSNKEEGEEITWKDLKAMKY TWQVAQETLRMFPPVFGTFRKAITDIQYDGYTIPKGWKLLWTTYSTHPKDLYFNEPEK FMPSRFDQEGKHVAPYTFLPFGGGQRSCVGWEFSKMEILLFVHHFVKTFSSYTPVDP DEKISGDPLPPLPSKGFSIKLFPRP II. Acyltransferases a. Al MGRFNVDMIERVIVAPCLQSPKNILH LSPIDNKTRGLTNILSVYNASQRVSVSADPAKTI REALSKVLVYYPPFAGRLRNTENGDLEVECTGEGAVFVEAMADN DLSVLQDFNEYDP 185 SFQQLVFNLREDVNIEDLHLLTVQVTRFTCGGFVVGTRFHHSVSDGKGIGQLLKGMGE MARGEFKPSLEPIWNREMVKPEDIMYLQFDHFDFIHPPLNLEKSIQASMVISFERINYIK RCMMEECKEFFSAFEVVVALIWLARTKSFRIPPNEYVKIIFPIDMRNSFDSPLPKGYYGN AIGNACAMDNVKDLLNGSLLYALMLIKKSKFALNENFKSRILTKPSTLDANMKHENVVG CGDWRNLGFYEADFGWGNAVNVSPMQQQREHELAMQNYFLFLRSAKNMIDGIKILMF MPASMVKPFKIEMEVTINKYVAKICNSKL b.A2 MEKTDLHVNLIEKVMVGPSPPLPKTTLQLSSIDNLPGVRGSIFNALLIYNASPSPTMISA DPAKPI REALAKI LVYYPPFAGRLRETENGDLEVECTGEGAM FLEAMADN ELSVLGDF DDSNPSFQQLLFSLPLDTNFKDLSLLVVQVTRFTCGGFVVGVSFHHGVCDGRGAAQF LKGLAEMARGEVKLSLEPIWNRELVKLDDPKYLQFFHFEFLRAPSIVEKIVQTYFIIDFET INYIKQSVMEECKEFCSSFEVASAMTWIARTRAFQIPESEYVKILFGMDMRNSFNPPLP SGYYGNSIGTACAVDNVQDLLSGSLLRAIMIIKKSKVSLNDNFKSRAVVKPSELDVNMN HENVVAFADWSRLGFDEVDFGWGNAVSVSPVQQQSALAMQNYFLFLKPSKNKPDGI KILMFLPLSKMKSFKIEMEAMMKKYVAKV c.A3 MAGSTEFVVRSLERVMVAPSQPSPKAFLQLSTLDNLPGVRENIFNTLLVYNASDRVSV DPAKVIRQALSKVLVYYSPFAGRLRKKENGDLEVECTGEGALFVEAMADTDLSVLGDL DDYSPSLEQLLFCLPPDTDIEDIHPLVVQVTRFTCGGFVVGVSFCHGICDGLGAGQFLI 186 AMGEMARGEIKPSSEPIWKRELLKPEDPLYRFQYYHFQLICPPSTFGKIVQGSLVITSET INCIKQCLREESKEFCSAFEVVSALAWIARTRALQIPHSENVKLIFAMDMRKLFNPPLSK GYYGNFVGTVCAMDNVKDLLSGSLLRVVRIIKKAKVSLNEHFTSTIVTPRSGSDESINYE NIVGFGDRRRLGFDEVDFGWGHADNVSLVQHGLKDVSVVQSYFLFIRPPKNNPDGIKI LSFMPPSIVKSFKFEMETMTNKYVTKP d.A4 MEKSGSADLHVNIIERVVVAPCQPTPKTILQLSSIDKMGGGFANVLLVFGASHGVSADP AKTIREALSKTLVFYFPFAGRLRKKEDGDIEVECIEQGALFVEAMADNDLSVVRDLDEY NPLFRQLQSSLSLDTDYKDLHLMTVQVTPFTCGGFVMGTSVHQSICDGNGLGQFFKS MAEIVRGEVKPSIEPIWNRELVKPEDYIHLQLYVSEFIRPPLVVEKVGQTSLVISFEKINHI KRCIMEESKESFSSFEIVTAMVWLARTRAFQIPHNEDVTLLLAMDARRSFDPPIPKGYY GNVIGTTYAKDNVHNLLSGSLLHALTVIKKSMSSFYENMTSRVLVNPSTLDLSMKYENV VSLSDWSRLGHNEVDFGWGNAINVSTLQQQWENEVAIPTFFTFLQTPKNIPDGIKILMF MPPSREKTFEIEVEAMIRKYLTKVSHSKL e.A5 MKKTGSFAEFHVNMIERVMVRPCLPSPKTILPLSAIDNMARAFSNVLLVYAANMDRVSA DPAKVI REALSKVLVYYYPFAGRLRN KENGELEVECTGQGVLFLEAMADSDLSVLTDL DNYNPSFQQLIFSLPQDTDIEDLHLLIVQVTRFTCGGFVVGANVYGSACDAKGFGQFL QSMAEMARGEVKPSIEPWNRELVKLEHCMPFRMSHLQIIHAPVIEEKFVQTSLVINFEII 187 NHIRRRIMEERKESLSSFEIVAALVWLAKIKAFQIPHSENVKLLFAMDLRRSFNPPLPHG YYGNAFGIACAMDNVHDLLSGSLLRTIMIIKKSKFSLHKELNSKTVMSSSVVDVNTKFED VVSISDWRHSIYYEVDFGWGDAMNVSTMLQQQEHEKSLPTYFSFLQSTKNMPDGIKM LMFMPPSKLKKFKIEIEAMIKKYVTKVCPSKL f.A6 MEKAGSTDFHVKKFDPVMVAPSLPSPKATVQLSVVDSLTICRGIFNTLLVFNAPDNISA DPVKIIREALSKVLVYYFPLAGRLRSKEIGELEVECTGDGALFVEAMVEDTISVLRDLDD LNPSFQQLVFWHPLDTAIEDLHLVIVQVTRFTCGGIAVGVTLPHSVCDGRGAAQFVTAL AEMARGEVKPSLEPIWNRELLNPEDPLHLQLNQFDSICPPPMLEELGQASFVINVDTIE YMKQCVMEECNEFCSSFEVVAALVWIARTKALQIPHTENVKLLFAMDLRKLFNPPLPN GYYGNAIGTAYAMDNVQDLLNGSLLRAIMIIKKAKADLKDNYSRSRVVTNPYSLDVNKK SDNILALSDWRRLGFYEADFGWGGPLNVSSLQRLENGLPMFSTFLYLLPAKNKSDGIK LLLSCMPPTTLKSFKIVMEAMIEKYVSKV g.A7 MEKGNASDVPELHVQICERVMVKPCVPSPSPN LVLQLSAVDRLPGMKFATFSAVLVYN ASSHSI FANPAQI I RQALSKVLQYYPAFAGRI RQKEN EELEVECTGEGALFVEALVDNDL SVLRDLDAQNASYEQLLFSLPPNIQVQDLHPLILQVTRFTCGGFVVGVGFHHGICDARG GTQFLQGLADMARGETKPLVEPVWNRELIKPEDLMHLQFHKFGLIRQPLKLDEICQAS FTINSEIINYIKQCVIEECNEIFSAFEVVVALTWIARTKAFQIPHNENVMMLFGMDARKYF 188 NPPLPKGYYGNAIGTSCVIENVQDLLNGSLSRAVMITKKSKIPLIENLRSRIVANQSGVD EEIKHENVVGFGDWRRLGFHEVDFGSGDAVNISPIQQRLEDDQLAMRNYFLFLRPYKD MPNGIKILMFMDPSRVKLFKDEMEAMIIKYMPKA h.A8 MEKLHVDIIERVKVAPCLPSSKEILQLSSLDNILRCYVSVLFVYDRVSTVSANPAKTIREA LSKVLVYYSPFAGRLRNKENGDLEVECSGEGAVFVEAMADNELSVLQDLDEYCTSLK QLIFTVPMDTKIEDLHLLSVQVTSFTCGGFVVGISFYHTICDGKGLGQFLQGMSEISKGA FKPSLEPVWNREMVKPEHLMFLQFNNFEFVPHPLKFKKIVKASIEINFETINCFKQCMM EECKENFSTFEIVAALIWLAKTKSFQIPDSENVKLMFAVDMRTSFDPPLPKGYYGNVIGI AGAIDNVKELLSGSILRALIIIQKTIFSLKDNFISRRLMKPSTLDVNMKHENVVLLGDWRN LGYYEADCGCGNLSNVIPMDQQIEHESPVQSRFMLLRSSKNMQNGIKILMSMPESMA KPFKSEMKFTIKKYVTGACFSEL i.A9 MEKAGSSTEFHVKISDPVMVPPCIPSPKTILQLSAVDNYPAVRGNILDCLLVYNASNTIS ADPATVIREALSKVLVYYFPFAGRMRNKGDGELEVDCTGEGALFVEAMADDNLSVLG GFDYHNPAFGKLLYSLPLDTPIHDLHPLVVQVTRFTCGGFVVGLSLDHSICDGRGAGQ FLKALAEMARGEAKPSLEPIWNRELLKPEDLIRLQFYHFESMRPPPIVEEIVQASIIVNSE TISNIKQYIMEECKESSFAFEVVAALAWLARTRAFQIPHTENVKLLFAVDTRRSFDPPLP KGYYGNAAGNACAMDNVQDLLNGSLLRAVMIIKKSKVSLNENIRAKTVMRPSAIDVNM 189 KHESTVGLSDLRHLGFNEVDFGWGDALNASLVQHGVIQQNYFLFLQPSKNMNGGIKIA MFMPQSKVKPFKIEMEALISKYATKV j. B (benzoyltransferase) MGRFNVDMIERVIVAPCLQSPKNILHLSPIDNKTRGLTNILSVYNASQRVSVSADPAKTI REALSKVLVYYPPFAGRLRNTENGDLEVECTGEGAVFVEAMADNDLSVLQDFNEYDP SFQQLVFNLREDVNIEDLHLLTVQVTRFTCGGFVVGTRFHHSVSDGKGIGQLLKGMGE MARGEFKPSLEPIWNREMVKPEDIMYLQFDHFDFIHPPLNLEKSIQASMVISFERINYIK RCMMEECKEFFSAFEVVVALIWLARTKSFRIPPNEYVKIIFPIDMRNSFDSPLPKGYYGN AIGNACAMDNVKDLLNGSLLYALMLIKKSKFALNENFKSRILTKPSTLDANMKHENVVG CGDWRNLGFYEADFGWGNAVNVSPMQQQREHELAMQNYFLFLRSAKNMIDGIKILMF MPASMVKPFKIEMEVTINKYVAKICNSKL III. Cytochrome P450 reductase a. CPR1 MQANSNTVEGASQGKSLLDISRLDHIFALLLNGKGGDLGAMTGSALILTENSQNLMILT TALAVLVACVFFFVWRRGGSDTQKPAVRPTPLVKEEDEEEEDDSAKKKVTIFFGTQTG TAEGFAKALAEEAKARYEKAVFKVVDLDNYAADDEQYEEKLKKEKLAFFMLATYGDGE PTDNAARFYKWFLEGKEREPWLSDLTYGVFGLGNRQYEHFNKVAKAVDEVLIEQGAK 190 RLVPVGLGDDDQCIEDDFTAWREQVWPELDQLLRDEDDEPTSATPYTAAIPEYRVEIY DSVVSVYEETHALKQNGQAVYDIHHPCRSNVAVRRELHTPLSDRSCIHLEFDISDTGLI YETGDHVGVHTENSIETVEEAAKLLGYQLDTIFSVHGDKEDGTPLGGSSLPPPFPGPC TLRTALARYADLLNPPRKAAFLALAAHASDPAEAERLKFLSSPAGKDEYSQWVTASQR SLLEI MAEFPSAKPPLGVFFAAIAPRLQPRYYSISSSPRFAPSRI HVTCALVYGPSPTGRI HKGVCSNWMKNSLPSEETHDCSWAPVFVRQSNFKLPADSTTPIVMVGPGTGFAPFR GFLQERAKLQEAGEKLGPAVLFFGCRNRQMDYIYEDELKGYVEKGILTNLIVAFSREGA TKEYVQHKMLEKASDTWSLIAQGGYLYVCGDAKGMARDVHRTLHTIVQEQESVDSSK AEFLVKKLQMDGRYLRDIW 191 Appendix C Deduced taxane metabolic pathway 193 g { t 4~y~ "~ .1 - / 4 4 4 -b 4 ~x~I~A 4 -K 4 ~<0 4 44 -K 4 -K 4 'L . ~c-~ -K Appendix D: Sample PDB files for heme moiety of P450 HI & docking code Whereas MODELER successfully generates PDB files for the polypeptide sequence of the enzymes, the heme moiety has to docked, energy-optimized and then linked to the polypeptide chain manually. The algorithm utilized in Chapter 4 is wholly novel and atomic coordinates of the heme group have been provided herein as a reference. a. Ground state -13.705 -7.698 59.813 1.00 56.34 HETATM 3795 CBB HEM 600 HETATM 3796 CBC HEM 600 -21.741 -4.086 60.876 1.00 54.16 -17.839 -7.090 64.655 1.00 55.01 HETATM 3797 FE HEM 600 -13.943 -8.656 60.714 1.00 54.29 HETATM 3798 CAB HEM 600 HETATM 3799 CAC HEM 600 -20.430 -4.080 60.621 1.00 53.50 -14.057 -8.795 63.248 1.00 53.56 HETATM 3800 C2B HEM 600 HETATM 3801 C2C HEM 600 -18.476 -5.703 60.617 1.00 53.67 -16.583 -7.878 68.595 1.00 53.10 HETATM 3802 C2A HEM 600 HETATM 3803 C3D HEM 600 -20.340 -4.930 67.231 1.00 54.61 HETATM 3804 C2D HEM 600 -20.826 -4.472 66.012 1.00 54.14 HETATM 3805 C3A HEM 600 -15.499 -8.438 67.935 1.00 53.10 HETATM 3806 C3B HEM 600 -14.554 -8.364 62.030 1.00 54.03 -19.490 -5.021 61.270 1.00 53.94 HETATM 3807 C3C HEM 600 HETATM 3808 CMA HEM 600 -14.555 -9.479 68.479 1.00 52.53 HETATM 3809 CMD HEM 600 -22.035 -3.604 65.798 1.00 53.79 HETATM 3810 CMB HEM 600 -12.835 -9.641 63.472 1.00 52.87 -18.147 -5.623 59.153 1.00 52.76 HETATM 3811 CMC HEM 600 HETATM 3812 CHA HEM 600 -18.447 -6.389 67.900 1.00 53.35 HETATM 3813 CHB HEM 600 -14.755 -8.521 65.595 1.00 53.12 -16.564 -7.081 61.342 1.00 53.29 HETATM 3814 CHC HEM 600 -20.099 -4.703 63.658 1.00 53.36 HETATM 3815 CHD HEM 600 -17.028 -8.260 69.989 1.00 53.34 HETATM 3816 CAA HEM 600 HETATM 3817 CAD HEM 600 -20.994 -4.737 68.577 1.00 55.31 -17.265 -7.104 67.652 1.00 52.88 HETATM 3818 CIA HEM 600 -14.908 -8.296 64.226 1.00 52.92 HETATM 3819 C1B HEM 600 HETATM 3820 C1C HEM 600 -17.742 -6.364 61.593 1.00 53.10 HETATM 3821 C1D HEM 600 -19.967 -4.953 65.031 1.00 53.77 HETATM 3822 C4A HEM 600 -15.581 -8.029 66.611 1.00 53.03 HETATM 3823 C4D HEM 600 -19.213 -5.698 66.947 1.00 54.08 HETATM 3824 C4B HEM 600 -15.714 -7.638 62.305 1.00 53.89 -19.345 -5.294 62.632 1.00 53.55 HETATM 3825 C4C HEM 600 HETATM 3826 CBA HEM 600 -17.758 -9.609 69.999 1.00 55.72 -21.969 -5.882 68.860 1.00 58.09 HETATM 3827 CBD HEM 600 -18.221 -9.945 71.386 1.00 58.55 HEM 600 HETATM 3828 CGA HETATM 3829 CGD HEM 600 -22.655 -5.679 70.176 1.00 60.08 -16.641 -7.190 66.442 1.00 52.37 HETATM 3830 NA HEM 600 C C FE+3 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N 197 HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM 3831 3832 3833 3834 3835 NB HEM ND HEM NC HEM HETATM HETATM CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3836 3837 3347 3797 3797 3797 3795 3796 3798 02A HEM CONECT 3799 CONECT 3800 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 600 600 600 01A HEM 600 01D HEM 600 600 02D HEM 600 -15.919 -7.593 33.649 1.00 53.29 -18.991 -5.703 65.605 1.00 53.53 -18.293 -17.423 -22.112 -19.447 -6.139 -9.757 -6.139 -10.375 62.818 1.00 52.75 72.413 1.00 60.38 71.281 1.00 59.70 71.585 1.00 58.24 -23.781 -5.004 70.236 1.00 60.88 N N N 0 0 0 0 3797 3347 3830 3831 3832 3833 3798 3799 37953806 37963807 3806 3810 3807 3811 3805 3816 3804 3817 3801 3802 3803 3804 3803 3809 3805 3802 3808 CONECT 3806 3798 3800 CONECT 3807 3799 3801 CONECT 3808 3805 3819 3820 3818 3823 3821 3822 3824 3825 CONECT 3809 3804 CONECT 3810 3800 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3811 3812 3813 3814 3815 CONECT 3816 CONECT 3817 CONECT 3818 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3801 38183823 38193822 3820 3824 3821 3825 3802 3826 3803 3827 3802 3812 3830 3800 3813 3831 3801 3814 3833 3819 3820 3821 3804 3815 3832 3822 3805 3813 3830 CONECT 3823 3803 3812 3832 CONECT 3824 3806 3814 3831 CONECT 3825 3807 3815 CONECT 3826 38163828 CONECT 3827 3817 3829 CONECT 3828 3826 3834 CONECT 3829 3827 3835 CONECT 3830 3797 3818 CONECT 3831 3797 3819 CONECT 3832 3797 3821 CONECT 3833 3797 3820 CONECT 3834 3828 CONECT 3835 3829 CONECT 3836 3828 CONECT 3837 3829 END 3833 3836 3837 3822 3824 3823 3825 198 b. Activated state -13.705 -7.698 59.813 1.00 56.34 HETATM 3795 CBB HEM 600 HETATM 3796 CBC HEM 600 -21.741 -4.086 60.876 1.00 54.16 HETATM 3797 FE HEM 600 -17.464 -6.649 64.627 1.00 55.01 HETATM 3798 CAB HEM 600 -13.943 -8.656 60.714 1.00 54.29 HETATM 3799 CAC HEM 600 -20.430 -4.080 60.621 1.00 53.50 -14.057 -8.795 63.248 1.00 53.56 HETATM 3800 C2B HEM 600 HETATM 3801 C2C HEM 600 -18.476 -5.703 60.617 1.00 53.67 -16.583 -7.878 68.595 1.00 53.10 HETATM 3802 C2A HEM 600 HETATM 3803 C3D HEM 600 -20.340 -4.930 67.231 1.00 54.61 HETATM 3804 C2D HEM 600 -20.826 -4.472 66.012 1.00 54.14 HETATM 3805 C3A HEM 600 -15.499 -8.438 67.935 1.00 53.10 HETATM 3806 C3B HEM 600 -14.554 -8.364 62.030 1.00 54.03 HETATM 3807 C30 HEM 600 -19.490 -5.021 61.270 1.00 53.94 HETATM 3808 CMA HEM 600 -14.555 -9.479 68.479 1.00 52.53 HETATM 3809 CMD HEM 600 -22.035 -3.604 65.798 1.00 53.79 HETATM 3810 CMB HEM 600 -12.835 -9.641 63.472 1.00 52.87 HETATM 3811 CMC HEM 600 -18.147 -5.623 59.153 1.00 52.76 HETATM 3812 CHA HEM 600 -18.447 -6.389 67.900 1.00 53.35 HETATM 3813 CHB HEM 600 -14.755 -8.521 65.595 1.00 53.12 -16.564 -7.081 61.342 1.00 53.29 HETATM 3814 CHC HEM 600 -20.099 -4.703 63.658 1.00 53.36 HETATM 3815 CHD HEM 600 -17.028 -8.260 69.989 1.00 53.34 HETATM 3816 CAA HEM 600 HETATM 3817 CAD HEM 600 -20.994 -4.737 68.577 1.00 55.31 HETATM 3818 C1A HEM 600 -17.265 -7.104 67.652 1.00 52.88 HETATM 3819 C1B HEM 600 -14.908 -8.296 64.226 1.00 52.92 HETATM 3820 CC HEM 600 -17.742 -6.364 61.593 1.00 53.10 HETATM 3821 ClD HEM 600 -19.967 -4.953 65.031 1.00 53.77 -15.581 -8.029 66.611 1.00 53.03 HETATM 3822 C4A HEM 600 HETATM 3823 C4D HEM 600 -19.213 -5.698 66.947 1.00 54.08 -15.714 -7.638 62.305 1.00 53.89 HETATM 3824 C4B HEM 600 HETATM 3825 C4C HEM 600 -19.345 -5.294 62.632 1.00 53.55 HETATM 3826 CBA HEM 600 -17.758 -9.609 69.999 1.00 55.72 HETATM 3827 CBD HEM 600 -21.969 -5.882 68.860 1.00 58.09 HETATM 3828 CGA HEM 600 -18.221 -9.945 71.386 1.00 58.55 -22.655 -5.679 70.176 1.00 60.08 HETATM 3829 CGD HEM 600 HETATM 3830 NA HEM 600 -16.641 -7.190 66.442 1.00 52.37 HETATM 3831 NB HEM 600 -15.919 -7.593 63.649 1.00 53.29 HETATM 3832 ND HEM 600 -18.991 -5.703 65.605 1.00 53.53 HETATM 3833 NC HEM 600 -18.293 -6.139 62.818 1.00 52.75 -17.423 -9.757 72.413 1.00 60.38 HETATM 3834 01A HEM 600 HETATM 3835 01D HEM 600 -22.112 -6.139 71.281 1.00 59.70 HETATM 3836 02A HEM 600 -19.447 -10.375 71.585 1.00 58.24 HETATM 3837 02D HEM 600 -23.781 -5.004 70.236 1.00 60.88 CONECT 3347 3797 CONECT 3797 3347 CONECT 3797 3830 3831 3832 CONECT 3797 3833 CONECT 3795 3798 CONECT 3796 3799 CONECT 3798 3795 3806 CONECT 3799 3796 3807 C C FE+3 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N N 0 0 0 0 199 CONECT 3800 3806 3810 3819 CONECT 3801 3807 3811 3820 CONECT 3802 3805 3816 3818 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3803 3804 3805 3806 3804 3817 3803 3809 3802 3808 3798 3800 3823 3821 3822 3824 CONECT 3807 3799 3801 3825 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3808 3809 3810 3811 3812 3813 3814 3805 3804 3800 3801 3818 3823 3819 3822 3820 3824 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3815 3816 3817 3818 3821 3802 3803 3802 3825 3826 3827 3812 3830 CONECT 3819 3800 3813 3831 CONECT 3820 3801 3814 3833 CONECT 3821 3804 3815 3832 CONECT 3822 3805 3813 3830 CONECT 3823 3803 3812 3832 CONECT 3824 3806 3814 3831 CONECT 3825 3807 3815 3833 CONECT 3826 3816 3828 CONECT 3827 3817 3829 CONECT 3828 3826 3834 3836 CONECT 3829 3827 3835 3837 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3830 3831 3832 3833 3834 3835 3797 3797 3797 3797 3828 3829 3818 3819 3821 3820 3822 3824 3823 3825 CONECT 3836 3828 CONECT 3837 3829 END c. Peroxyheme state HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM 3795 3796 3797 3798 3799 3800 3801 3802 3803 3804 3805 CAA HEM CAB HEM CAC HEM CAD HEM NA HEM CBA HEM CBB HEM CBC HEM CBD HEM NB HEM CGA HEM 600 -17.028 -8.260 69.989 1.00 53.34 600 -13.943 -8.656 60.714 1.00 54.29 600 -20.430 -4.080 60.621 1.00 53.50 600 -20.994 -4.737 68.577 1.00 55.31 600 -16.641 -7.190 66.442 1.00 52.37 600 -17.758 -9.609 69.999 1.00 55.72 600 -13.705 -7.698 59.813 1.00 56.34 600 -21.741 -4.086 60.876 1.00 54.16 600 -21.969 -5.882 68.860 1.00 58.09 600 -15.919 -7.593 63.649 1.00 53.29 600 -18.221 -9.945 71.386 1.00 58.55 C C C C N C C C C N C 200 HETATM 3806 CGD HEM 600 HETATM 3807 ND HEM 600 HETATM 3808 CHA HEM 600 HETATM 3809 CHB HEM 600 HETATM 3810 CHC HEM 600 HETATM 3811 CHD HEM 600 HETATM 3812 CMA HEM 600 HETATM 3813 CMB HEM 600 HETATM 3814 CMC HEM 600 HETATM 3815 CMD HEM 600 HETATM 3816 CIA HEM 600 HETATM 3817 C1B HEM 600 HETATM 3818 C1C HEM 600 HETATM 3819 ClD HEM 600 HETATM 3820 01 HEM 600 HETATM 3821 01A HEM 600 HETATM 3822 01D HEM 600 HETATM 3823 C2A HEM 600 HETATM 3824 C2B HEM 600 HETATM 3825 C2C HEM 600 HETATM 3826 C2D HEM 600 HETATM 3827 02 HEM 600 HETATM 3828 02A HEM 600 HETATM 3829 02D HEM 600 HETATM 3830 C3A HEM 600 HETATM 3831 C3B HEM 600 HETATM 3832 C3C HEM 600 HETATM 3833 C3D HEM 600 HETATM 3834 C4A HEM 600 HETATM 3835 C4B HEM 600 HETATM 3836 C4C HEM 600 HETATM 3837 C4D HEM 600 HETATM 3838 NC HEM 600 HETATM 3839 FE HEM 600 HETATM 3840 HI HEM 600 CONECT 3827 3840 CONECT 3840 3827 CONECT 3347 3839 CONECT 3795 38003823 CONECT 3796 3801 3831 CONECT 3797 3802 3832 CONECT 3798 38033833 CONECT 3799 3816 CONECT 3799 3834 CONECT 3799 3839 CONECT 3800 37953805 CONECT 3801 3796 CONECT 3802 3797 CONECT 3803 37983806 CONECT 3804 3817 CONECT 3804 3835 CONECT 3804 3839 CONECT 3805 3800 CONECT 3805 3821 CONECT 3805 3828 -22.655 -5.679 70.176 1.00 60.08 -18.991 -5.703 65.605 1.00 53.53 -18.447 -6.389 67.900 1.00 53.35 -14.755 -8.521 65.595 1.00 53.12 -16.564 -7.081 61.342 1.00 53.29 -20.099 -4.703 63.658 1.00 53.36 -14.555 -9.479 68.479 1.00 52.53 -12.835 -9.641 63.472 1.00 52.87 -18.147 -5.623 59.153 1.00 52.76 -22.035 -3.604 65.798 1.00 53.79 -17.265 -7.104 67.652 1.00 52.88 -14.908 -8.296 64.226 1.00 52.92 -17.742 -6.364 61.593 1.00 53.10 -19.967 -4.953 65.031 1.00 53.77 -16.413 -4.844 64.539 1.00 30.00 -17.423 -9.757 72.413 1.00 60.38 -22.112 -6.139 71.281 1.00 59.70 -16.583 -7.878 68.595 1.00 53.10 -14.057 -8.795 63.248 1.00 53.56 -18.476 -5.703 60.617 1.00 53.67 -20.826 -4.472 66.012 1.00 54.14 -16.659 -4.287 63.318 1.00 30.00 -19.447 -10.375 71.585 1.00 58.24 -23.781 -5.004 70.236 1.00 60.88 -15.499 -8.438 67.935 1.00 53.10 -14.554 -8.364 62.030 1.00 54.03 -19.490 -5.021 61.270 1.00 53.94 -20.340 -4.930 67.231 1.00 54.61 -15.581 -8.029 66.611 1.00 53.03 -15.714 -7.638 62.305 1.00 53.89 -19.345 -5.294 62.632 1.00 53.55 -19.213 -5.698 66.947 1.00 54.08 -18.293 -6.139 62.818 1.00 52.75 -17.464 -6.649 64.627 1.00 55.01 -15.917 -3.654 63.002 1.00 53.51 C N C C C C C C C C C C C C 0 0 0 C C C C 0 0 0 C C C C C C C C N FE+3 H 201 CONECT 3806 3803 CONECT 3806 3822 CONECT 3806 3829 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3807 3807 3807 3808 3819 3837 3839 3816 CONECT 3808 3837 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3809 3809 3810 3810 3811 3811 3812 3813 3817 3834 3818 3835 3819 3836 3830 3824 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3814 3815 3816 3816 3816 3825 3826 3799 3808 3823 CONECT 3817 3804 CONECT 3817 3809 CONECT 3817 3824 CONECT 3818 3810 CONECT 3818 3825 CONECT 3818 3838 CONECT 3819 3807 CONECT 3819 3811 CONECT 3819 3826 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3820 3821 3822 3823 3827 3839 3805 3806 3795 CONECT 3823 3816 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3823 3824 3824 3824 3830 3813 3817 3831 CONECT 3825 3814 CONECT 3825 3818 CONECT 3825 3832 CONECT 3826 3815 CONECT 3826 3819 CONECT 3826 3833 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3827 3828 3829 3830 3830 3830 3831 3831 3831 3832 3820 3805 3806 3812 3823 3834 3796 3824 3835 3797 202 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT END 3832 3832 3833 3833 3833 3834 3834 3834 3835 3835 3835 3836 3836 3836 3837 3837 3837 3838 3838 3838 3839 3825 3836 3798 3826 3837 3799 3809 3830 3804 3810 3831 3811 3832 3838 3807 3808 3833 3818 3836 3839 3347 3799 3804 3807 3820 3838 d. Oxyferyl state HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM 3795 3796 3797 3798 3799 3800 3801 3802 3803 3804 3805 3806 3807 3808 3809 3810 3811 3812 3813 3814 3815 3816 3817 3818 3819 3820 CAA HEM CAB HEM CAC HEM CAD HEM NA HEM CBA HEM CBB HEM CBC HEM CBD HEM NB HEM CGA HEM CGD HEM ND HEM CHA HEM CHB HEM CHC HEM CHD HEM CMA HEM CMB HEM CMC HEM CMD HEM CIA HEM C1B HEM C1C HEM ClD HEM 01 HEM 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 -17.028 -8.260 69.989 1.00 53.34 -13.943 -8.656 60.714 1.00 54.29 -20.430 -4.080 60.621 1.00 53.50 -20.994 -4.737 68.577 1.00 55.31 -16.641 - 7.190 66.442 1.00 52.37 -17.758 -9.609 69.999 1.00 55.72 -13.705 -7.698 59.813 1.00 56.34 -21.741 -4.086 60.876 1.00 54.16 -21.969 -5.882 68.860 1.00 58.09 -15.919 - 7.593 63.649 1.00 53.29 -18.221 -9.945 71.386 1.00 58.55 -22.655 -5.679 70.176 1.00 60.08 -18.991 -5.703 65.605 1.00 53.53 -18.447 -6.389 67.900 1.00 53.35 -14.755 -8.521 65.595 1.00 53.12 -16.564 -7.081 61.342 1.00 53.29 -20.099 -4.703 63.658 1.00 53.36 -14.555 -9.479 68.479 1.00 52.53 -12.835 -9.641 63.472 1.00 52.87 -18.147 -5.623 59.153 1.00 52.76 -22.035 -3.604 65.798 1.00 53.79 -17.265 -7.104 67.652 1.00 52.88 -14.908 -8.296 64.226 1.00 52.92 -17.742 -6.364 61.593 1.00 53.10 -19.967 -4.953 65.031 1.00 53.77 -16.644 -5.148 64.446 1.00 30.00 C C C C N C C C C N C C N C C C C C C C C C C C C 0 203 HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM HETATM 3821 3822 3823 3824 3825 3826 01A 01D C2A C2B C2C C2D HEM HEM HEM HEM HEM HEM 600 600 600 600 600 600 -17.423 -22.112 -16.583 -14.057 -18.476 -20.826 -9.757 -6.139 -7.878 -8.795 -5.703 -4.472 72.413 71.281 68.595 63.248 60.617 66.012 1.00 60.38 1.0059.70 1.00 53.10 1.00 53.56 1.00 53.67 1.00 54.14 0 0 C C C C HETATM 3827 02A HEM 600 HETATM 3828 02D HEM 600 HETATM 3829 C3A HEM 600 -19.447 -10.375 71.585 1.00 58.24 -23.781 -5.004 70.236 1.00 60.88 -15.499 -8.438 67.935 1.00 53.10 0 0 C HETATM 3830 C3B HEM 600 -14.554 -8.364 62.030 1.00 54.03 C HETATM 3831 C3C HEM 600 -19.490 -5.021 61.270 1.00 53.94 C HETATM 3832 C3D HEM 600 -20.340 -4.930 67.231 1.00 54.61 C HETATM 3833 C4A HEM 600 HETATM 3834 C4B HEM 600 HETATM 3835 C4C HEM 600 -15.581 -8.029 66.611 1.00 53.03 -15.714 -7.638 62.305 1.00 53.89 -19.345 -5.294 62.632 1.00 53.55 C C C HETATM 3836 C4D HEM 600 -19.213 -5.698 66.947 1.00 54.08 C HETATM 3837 NC HEM 600 -18.293 -6.139 62.818 1.00 52.75 N HETATM CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT -17.464 -6.649 64.627 1.00 55.01 FE 3838 3347 3795 3796 3797 FE HEM 600 3838 3800 3823 3801 3830 3802 3831 CONECT 3798 3803 3832 CONECT 3799 3816 CONECT 3799 3833 CONECT 3799 3838 CONECT 3800 3795 3805 CONECT 3801 3796 CONECT 3802 3797 CONECT 3803 3798 3806 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3804 3804 3804 3805 3805 3805 3806 3817 3834 3838 3800 3821 3827 3803 CONECT 3806 3822 CONECT 3806 3828 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3807 3807 3807 3808 3808 3809 3809 3810 3819 3836 3838 3816 3836 3817 3833 3818 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3810 3811 3811 3812 3813 3814 3815 3816 3834 3819 3835 3829 3824 3825 3826 3799 204 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3816 3816 3817 3817 3817 3818 3818 3818 3808 3823 3804 3809 3824 3810 3825 3837 CONECT 3819 3807 CONECT 3819 3811 CONECT 3819 3826 CONECT 3820 3838 CONECT 3821 3805 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3822 3823 3823 3823 3824 3824 3825 3825 3825 3826 3806 3795 3816 3829 3813 3830 3814 3818 3831 3815 CONECT 3826 3819 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3826 3827 3828 3829 3829 3829 3830 3830 3830 3831 3831 3832 3832 3832 3805 3806 3812 3823 3833 3796 3824 3834 3797 3825 3798 3826 CONECT 3832 3836 CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT CONECT 3833 3833 3833 3834 3834 3834 3835 3835 3835 3836 3836 3836 3837 3837 3837 3838 3838 3799 3809 3829 3804 3810 3830 3811 3831 3837 3807 3808 3832 3818 3835 3838 3347 3799 3804 3807 3820 205 CONECT 3838 3837 END e. Sample code for substrate docking receptor = taxadiene5ahydroxylase.pdbqt ligand = taxadiene.pdbqt out = output iteration_1.pdbqt center_x = -22.519 centery = -19.74 center_z = -10.502 sizex = 40 size_y = 40 sizez = 40 exhaustiveness = 9 206 Appendix E: NMR raw data 207 OH HH Taxadien-5a-ol Species K . .4 SA 400 300 200 100 0 19.81 52 5.0 4.B 4.b 4.4 4.2 CD . l 34 L.2 3.D 2-a fi 1vpmno 2.6 2.4 2.Z 2. 1.1, 1.5 1.4 12 1.0 D.5 i-i r \.-&. 21.00 22.20 Retention time (minutes) 23.39 - A 24.58 GOk 0.4 3000 2250 1500 750 0 Oxacyclotaxane (OCT) Species I 4.6 4.4 400 300 200 100 0198 4.2 4.0 a.9 3.6 3.4 .2 LO LB 2.6 L4 ft I ga 2-2 Z. L's 1.6 14 L2 o.6 A L'0 L 19.81 21.00 22.20 Retention time (minutes) 23.39 24.58 A 3000 2250 1500 750 0 Cyclic ether Species G i- k 4.-4 42 400 300 200 100 0 -19.81 I I- 4.0 .4 1- - 1.2 3-0 2- Z.6. 2.4 fl 22 wPPM) Z.0 1.8 IA. I 1.2 1-4 1.0 -8 0.b -. 21.00 22.20 Retention time (minutes) 23.39 24.58 0.4 0-2 3000 2250 1500 750 0