North Nevada Infrastructure RFP
Addendum One
The Request for Proposal issued on June 27th for this project is modified, corrected, supplemented,
and/or superseded as hereinafter described. It will be construed that each bidder’s proposal is
submitted with full knowledge of all modifications and supplemental data specified herewith. This
addendum may affect pricing. Failure to acknowledge this addendum may be cause for rejection of
bid.
1. See attached Semple Brown C2.00 indicating roads and parking lots that
will be placed as part of this project. Failure to complete the north and west
parking lots and associated access by 8/23/2015 will result in Liquated
Damages of $750/day.
2. See Questions and Answers below for further clarification and refer to
attached Appendix A1.
Questions:
Answer:
Within the Below Grade and Above Grade descriptions of work there are several times
the RFP references the “VaPA Region”, can you clarify if this means the entire site within
the red boundary or if this is the area within the blue boundary.
Within the red boundary.
Questions:
Answer:
Please provide the RFP evaluation/scoring sheet
Please see attached
Question:
Who is responsible to plan and provide easement descriptions of the blvd and utility
corridor?
The D/B entity will be responsible for describing and preparing necessary documents for
UCCS signature.
Answer:
Question:
Answer:
Can you indicate who is on the selection committee.
The selection committee will be appointed by the UCCS Assistant Vice Chancellor for
Administration from the Facilities Services Planning, Design, and Construction group.
Question:
Will the Acknowledgement and Attestation and the Bonding letter be counted in the 30
page limit?
No.
Answer:
Question:
In insurance article 25F the contract states that claims shall be adjusted and settled by
the Principle Representative. Can this be adjusted since the builders risk coverage is
being provided by the Design/Builder?
Answer:
We do not read that clause to mean the Principle Representative intends to intervene in
negotiations between the Design Builder and the insurance provider. We interpret to
apply in situations where the provider and the Design Builder disagree as to the amount
of the claim so as to ensure the State that any cost of the loss is not borne by the State.
We can clarify with the selected D/B entity in contract negotiations.
Question:
Answer:
The waiver of subrogation on property insurance is not mutual, can it be modified to
mutual waiver or eliminated?
No