National Forest
Certification
October 7, 2008
Why Consider NFS Certification?
Force for change
– To-date certification has had positive impacts on
state, private, community, etc. forests
– Would National Forests be an exception?
Equitable access to certification
– Non-conformance with FSC’s own policy b/c of
current exclusion of an ownership class
– Certification is increasingly important for forest
managers and product companies to compete
Certifier’s Charge
• Assess whether policies, plans, and
procedures conform with FSC Standards
• Assess effectiveness and consistency of
implementing those management systems
Certification is not a panacea
Certification Process
1. Review of documents & stakeholder consult.
2. Audit planning: site selections, meetings, etc.
3. On-site assessment/evidence gathering
(interviews, field observations, document
review)
4. Deliberation and synthesis
5. Reporting
Example
C.6.3.d Old Growth: Ecological functions and values
shall be maintained intact, enhanced, or restored.
6.3.d.1 Type 1 stands are not harvested
6.3.d.3 Type 2 and Type 3- managed so no net
decline
Unique Aspects of Pilot Tests
•
•
•
•
•
•
Award of certification not a possible outcome
First assessments on U.S. National Forests
Federal Lands Policy
Additional considerations
Level of audit team expertise
Stakeholder consultation
Significant Non-conformances
• C.5.1- Ongoing budget reductions = lack of support
for long-term management and restoration
• C.5.6- Overstocked stands in areas designated for
active timber management
• C.6.3.- Old growth forest management
• C.6.5.- Road management
• C. 8.2.C- Monitoring key wildlife spp. and habitat
Force for Change- Cert. Success Factors
• Stakeholder participation (standard development
and evidence gathering)
• Strong market demand for FSC certified products
• Organizations where field staff are removed from
policy and strategic direction setting
• Organizations with chronic underfunding
• Senior management and field staff view certification
as a tool for improvement