IFRF solid fuel data base: drop tube experiments and modeling aOskar Karlström, aAnders Brink, aMikko Hupa, b,cLeonardo Tognotti aÅbo Akademi University, bUniversity of Pisa, cInternational Flame Research Foundation (IFRF) Liekkipäivät January 2012 IFRF solid fuel data base Uexp 130 fuels (coal, biomass...) 130 chars Proximate analysis (fvol fchar fash) Ultimate analysis (C, N, O, H...) Porosity, true density, apparent density Mass loss vs. Time experiments from high heating rate drop tube reactor South African coal char 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 1223K 4%O2 1223K 12%O2 1473K 4%O2 1673K 4%O2 0.2 0.0 0 1000 t (ms) 2000 http://sfdb.ifrf.net Objectives Compare combustion rates of chars from biomass, bituminous coals and anthracite coals Experiments Beech wood char Bituminous coal char Anthracite char d ≈ 40 μm d ≈ 40 μm d ≈ 40 μm Experiments 1. Devolatilization tests 1400 °C 100% N2 4m Chars particles collected 2. Char combustion tests 950-1400 °C 3-12% O2 Experiments South African coal char 1.0 Uexp 0.8 0.6 0.4 1223K 4%O2 1223K 12%O2 1473K 4%O2 1673K 4%O2 0.2 0.0 0 1000 t (ms) 2000 Model dm p dt d p kpO 2, s 2 n dm p 1 d p k PO2 , 2 dt dt d D p dm p n 2 d p d p ,0 1 U U 0.75 Model dm p 1 d p k pO2 , 2 dt dt d p D dm p k Aa e mpcp dT p dt n 2 T DC ( Ea / RT p ) hS p T T p f h dm p dt n, Aa, Ea ??? p T / 2 0.75 dp H reac S p p R4 T p4 Multivariable optimization “Multivariable optimization of reaction order and kinetic parameters for high temperature oxidation of 10 bituminous coal chars” Oskar Karlström, Anders Brink, Mikko Hupa, Leonardo Tognotti Combustion and Flame 2011 “One-parameter model for the oxidation of pulverized bituminous coal chars” Oskar Karlström, Anders Brink, Jaroslaw Hercog, Mikko Hupa, Leonardo Tognotti Energy and Fuels 2012 Results 1 1 Anthracite char d = 39 um 0.5 U U 0 0.5 Biomass char d0 = 41 um 0 0 1000 time (ms) 2000 0 0 1000 time (ms) 1 U Biom. char: n ~ 0.8 0.5 0 0 Bitum. char: n ~ 1 Bituminous coal char d0 = 42 um 1000 time (ms) 2000 Ant. char: n~0 2000 Biom. char: n ~ 0.8 Bitum. char: n ~ 1 Ant. char: 2C + O2→ 2 C(O) C(O) + O2→ CO/CO2 C(O) → CO 2C(O) → CO2 + C n~0 2C + O2→ 2 C(O) C(O) + O2→ CO/CO2 C(O) → CO 2C(O) → CO2 + C k 4 k 2 PO 2 , k3 r k4 r k2PO2 k3 Conclusions Multivariable optimization approach successfully applied on the various chars Biomass and bituminous coal chars: n ≈1 Anthracite chars: n ≈ 0 Reaction order differences can be explained by char oxidation mechanisms Surprisingly high reactivity of biomass Acknowledgement This work has been partly carried out within the consortium FUSEC (20112014) : -Tekes -Andritz Oy -Metso Power Oy -Foster Wheeler Energia Oy -UPM-Kymmene Oyj -Clyde Bergemann GmbH -International Paper Inc. -Top Analytica Oy Ab. Further the work is part of the ERANET-