Modelling the Psychology of Decision Making Palisade EMEA 2012 Risk Conference London 1 © 2012 Captum Capital Limited The Psychology of Decision Making The world is complex How do people cope with it? 2 Heuristics and Biases Simple rules of thumb Debatable about how accurate they are 3 Linda 31 years old Studied philosophy Very concerned about social discrimination Took part in anti-war demonstrations 4 What did she become? A bank teller A bank teller who is active in the feminist movement 5 The Representativeness Heuristic All female bank tellers 6 All female bank tellers who are also active feminists The Anchoring Effect The average raccoon weighs 2 kilograms How much does the average giraffe weigh, in kg? 7 Anchoring Judgements are often made by fixing on something and then adjusting for other evidence The “anchor” can even be unrelated, but non-arbitrary anchors have a larger effect 8 Sunk Costs You go to a play and the first act is terrible. You paid $40 each for a pair of tickets and waited on line for 2 hours to get them. Do you leave at intermission? 9 Sunk Costs Imagine you go to a play and the first act is terrible. Your friend gave you the tickets after discovering that she and her partner couldn’t make it to the show that night. Do you leave at intermission? 10 Sunk cost and loss aversion Losses are seen as more significant than gains 11 Modelling Thought and Behaviour We build models to aid our decisions Similar models can explain how we make those decisions 12 The Probabilistic Turn Cognitive science (and related fields!) increasingly using probabilistic models But aren’t people bad at judging probability? Probabilities are difficult to reason with, but frequencies produce accurate judgements 13 Flip a coin… Is the coin fair? Depends on how it lands 14 Degrees of belief HHHHH will lead to a strong belief that the coin is biased But if HHHHH occurs after 1000 previous trials that were 50% tails, belief will not change This is captured by Bayesian models 15 Moral Judgement and Decision Making Rapidly expanding field How does it differ from other JDM? 16 The Trolley Problems Pull the lever? 17 Push the man? The Trolley Problems 18 Pull the lever? Push the man? ~80% say yes! ~20% say yes! Why? Utility vs Rights? Personal vs Impersonal? 19 Why? “In real life it would hardly ever be certain that the man on the narrow track would be killed. Perhaps he might find a foothold on the side of the tunnel and cling on as the vehicle hurtled by. The driver of the tram does not then leap off and brain him with a crowbar.” 20 Causal Influence 21 @Risk implementation 22 And if we run them… Probability of Action Acceptable 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 Model (5000 iterations) 0.5 Observed 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Trolley Footbridge Problem 23 Criticism Not a great fit for the data But not bad for a simple model! What about a more complex model? 24 The Side-Effect Effect "We're thinking of starting a new program. It will help us increase profits, but it will also harm the environment.” "I don't care at all about harming the environment. I just want to make as much profit as I can. Let's start the program.” They started the program. Sure enough, the environment was harmed. Did the chairman intentionally harm the environment? 25 The Side-Effect Effect ~80% say yes, environment was intentionally harmed What if “help” replaces “harm”? Only ~20% say help was intentional 26 Sloman et al. Model of Intentionality Judgements 27 Or, simplified… 28 Implementation 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 Model 0.4 Observed 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Harm 29 Help To summarise… Decision making processes are predictably irrational DecisionTools software can be used to model these processes DecisionTools also makes an intuitive teaching tool 30 About Captum Innovation in Life Sciences Licensing Technology Valuation Modelling behaviour, innovation, value See us at 31 Risk Analysis using Contact Captum Capital Limited Chris Brand e: cmb@captum.com t: +44 (0) 115 988 6154 m: +44 (0) 7800 829 012 32 Cumberland House 35 Park Row Nottingham NG1 6EE United Kingdom www.captum.com