8. MONOPOLY: ONE PRODUCER AND MANY CUSTOMERS. Rama V. Ramachandran Summary. Historically governments have used monopolies to raise revenues and they pushed the prices so high that monopolies are identified with high prices and excess profits. A monopolist, supplying the whole market, is facing the market demand curve. Higher price leads to lower sales. Profits are maximized at the output at which marginal cost equals marginal revenue. Marginal revenue is less than marginal cost, price is greater than the constant marginal cost which is also average variable cost. The difference will depend on the price elasticity of demand. The firm may still suffer a loss if it has a high level of fixed cost. The cost of monopolies is the deadweight loss, the reduction in consumer’s surplus in excess of increase in the profits of the firm. Governments have confirmed monopolies on innovators on the ground that provide needed incentive. It also instituted competition policies to increase competition in commodities and financial markets. 8. 1.MONOPOLY: PAST MONOPOLIES AND OPPOSITION TO MONOPOLIES -1. In the market with one producer and many consumers, the concern is that the producer is able to earn excessive profit by charging consumers a high price. The ability to charge higher price was used by states to raise revenue and to promote political goals like geographical exploration and occupation. English East India Company, established in 1600 not only sought to monopolize trade from India but gradually occupied much of the territory before the Mutiny of 1857 when the territory reverted to the British Crown. The Dutch East India had a dominant position in trade from what is now Indonesia but its political control was less secure than that of East India Company. British Hudson Bay Company had a monopoly of trade with Canadian Indians and was till Canada became a Dominion in 19th century, It was the largest landowner in Canada. Its monopoly was abolished in 1870 relinquished the land it had under Royal Charter. 8.2. SALT MONOPOLIES. As daily consumption of salt is a biological necessity and salting was the only way to preserve fish and meat before the advent of refrigeration, governments from France to China realized that they can monopolize the production and distribution of salt and use it to raise revenue for the state by increasing its price well above the cost of production. The price of salt in France in 1630 was 14 times the cost of production while in 1710 it was 140 times the cost. As states developed new sources of revenue they stopped depending on salt though the monopolies lasted in France and Japan well into the twentieth century. The actions of certain monopolies, particularly those with state mandate, led to the view, expressed even by Adam Smith, that monopolies charge the highest price possible. This set of slide examine price and profits of a firm. 8.3. MONOPOLIST CAN CHOOSE PRICE OR SALES BUT NOT BOTH. We are the customers. Price We will decide how High much to buy. price Demand curve I am the monopolist. I will decide the price of my product. Low price Quantity Since monopolist supplies the whole market, the demand for his product is determined by the market demand curve. The quantity consumes purchase will decline with price. What the monopolist can choose is a point on it that determines the price-quantity combination. He cannot choose price and quantity independently. Since his profits depend on both price and quantity, he has to choose the point on demand curve that maximizes it. 8.4. PRICE, SALES AND MARGINAL REVENUE OF A MONOPOLIST. $ Sales revenue = $8 $4.00 $4 $ 3.50 Sales revenue = $10.50 Marginal revenue = $2.50 Sales revenue = $12 Marginal revenue = $1.50 $3.50 $3.00 $2.50 Demand curve $1.50 $3 Panel A Marginal revenue 23 4 Panel B Quantity To increase sales, the monopolist has to reduce price. If the price is $4, he sells two bottles. To increases sales, he has to reduce the price to $3.50. The sales revenue increased by $3.50 from the third bottle but the reduction in price reduced the sales revenue from the other two bottles by $1. Marginal revenue, increase in sales revenue for unit increase in price, is $2.50. Whenever a producer faces a downward sloping demand curve, his marginal revenue will be less than the price and, at each output, is given by a point below the demand curve. 8.5 PROFIT MAXIMIZING OUTPUT AND PRICE -1. $ $ Marginal revenue $ Demand curve Marginal$C cost $R Monopoly price $R $$ $C $R Marginal cost $ R $C $E $E $ $C $C $ $ Output Profit maximizing output Panel A Marginal revenue Profit Output maximizing output Panel B In Panel A, the marginal revenue, the height of green boxes decreases as output increases. As long as marginal revenue is greater than marginal cost, a unit increase in output provides the monopolist an incremental revenue that exceeds his incremental cost. He has incentive to increase output. When the output at which the two are equal is reached, the monopolist will not increase output any further. It is his profit maximizing output. The condition for profit maximization is that marginal revenue equals marginal cost. 8.6. PROFIT MAXIMIZING OUTPUT AND PRICE -2. $ $ Marginal revenue $ Demand curve Marginal$C cost $R Monopoly price $R $$ $C $R $ $C $C $C $ $E $E Output Profit maximizing output Panel A Marginal cost $ R $ Marginal revenue Profit Output maximizing output Panel B The monopolist chooses the output at which marginal cost equals marginal revenue. Since marginal revenue is less than the price, the price at which monopolist sells his output will be greater than marginal cost (Panel B). How high will be the price over marginal cost? Consider the firm producing an output at which price equals marginal cost (the blue dot). Output is greater than profit maximizing output. He has to move up the demand curve, increasing price to reduce output to profit maximizing level. How much he has to increase the price depends on how sensitive the quantities consumers purchase are to price increases. 8.7. PRICE ELASTICITY – A MEASURE OF PRICE SENSITIVENESS -1. Price elasticity of demand, as defined in the diagram, is the measure of consumers’ price sensitivity. Since price and quantity changes in opposite directions, the ratio of the two terms in bracket is negative (in diagram, quantity is increasing while price is decreasing). The ratio is multiplied by a negative sign to make it positive number. 8.8. PRICE ELASTICITY, MARGINAL REVENUE AND PROFIT MAXIMIZATION. At the output at which price equals marginal cost, marginal revenue is less than marginal cost. By reducing output, firm increases its gross profit (since administrative and finance cost is not changing, it increases all measures of profit). The increase in price needed to reduce output to profit maximization depends on the price elasticity. Relation between price, marginal cost and price elasticity is given by the equation on the right, known as Lerner’s index. Higher is elasticity, the less is the excess of price over marginal cost. $ Demand curve Monopoly price Marginal cost Marginal revenue Profit Output maximizing output Price - marginal cost price = 1 Elasticity 8.9 DOES PRICE EXCEEDING MARGINAL COST IMPLY EXCESS PROFIT? Under the assumptions (marginal cost a constant for all levels of output), the difference between price and marginal cost is the gross profit per unit of output. The difference times output equals the total gross profit. The firm has to pay administrative and finance cost from the gross profits. It is possible that the gross profit is not enough to meet these costs. Eurotunnel has a monopoly on rail link between France and England. Yet it was near bankruptcy more than once since it started operations in 1994. It had, like all megaprojects, cost overrun but it was hurt most by shortfall in projected revenue. Rail traffic on opening was half of what was projected. Ferries that linked Continent with Europe cut fares. Businesses who had invested in moving goods through ferries and passengers who liked privileges like duty free liquor on board were not willing to shift to rail. Substitution limits monopoly power. 8.10. BENEFITTING FROM TRADE: CONSUMER SURPLUS -1. Price Price Consumer surplus 6 5 4 Price Cost to consumer 0 1 2 Panel A Quantity Quantity pruchased Demand curve Quantity Panel B Trading, the exchange between a producer and a consumer, in a free market must benefit both. Otherwise one or the other party will withdraw. The benefit to the producer is profit. What is the benefit to consumer? A consumer values the first unit she purchases slightly less than $6. If the price is $6, she will not buy any unit (Panel A). If the price falls to $5, she will buy one unit but, since she values it close to $6, her gains from being able to buy it at $5 can be measured by the difference between her valuation and the price she pays, $1. 8.11.CONSUMER SURPLUS -2 She values the second unit less at just below $5. If the price falls to $4, she will buy the second unit and her consumer surplus from that unit is $1. But the unit she was valuing slightly less than $6, is also purchased at $4 and her surplus from it is now $2. The total surplus is $3. Consumer surplus increases with price reduction both from increase from units purchased before and from new units. In case of continuous variation, the blue triangle-like are under the demand curve and price line, is the measure of consumer surplus. The higher price (relative to marginal cost) that the monopolist charges has two effects. It increases his profit and it reduces, reversing the earlier arguments, the consumer surplus. Will the sum of the two increase or decrease? 8.12. DEADWEIGHT LOSS -1. Consumer surplus Gross profit Deadweight loss Price Price Consumer surplus Monopoly price Price Cost to consumer Quantity pruchased Demand curve Quantity Panel A. Marginal cost Cost of production Sales at monopoly price Demand curve Sales if Quantity price equals marginal cost Panel B When price was equal to marginal cost, consumer surplus was equal to the blue triangle in Panel A. When the price increased to monopoly price, consumer surplus decreased to the blue triangle in Panel B. The difference is the area of the grey triangle and the yellow rectangle. When the price was equal to marginal cost, the firm had no gross profit as its cost of production was equal to his sales revenue. At monopoly price, his price is higher than marginal cost and he has a profit equal to the yellow rectangle. 8.13. DEADWEIGHT LOSS -2 Pareto criterion classifies only changes that improves one without hurting another or vice versa. Here the monopolist increased profits while consumers have lower surplus. Pareto criterion cannot judge such a change. But the increase in profit (yellow rectangle) is less than the reduction of consumer surplus (yellow rectangle and grey triangle) The net loss, loss to consumer not made by gain by producer, is the grey triangle. It is the deadweight loss of monopoly and is a measure of welfare loss from monopoly. 8.14. JUSTIFICATION OF PATENTS AND COPYRIGHT -1. An innovator has to incur an upfront cost to develop the product or process ( a writer incurs cost as she prepares the manuscript). If the product once developed can be produced by many firms, the competition will drive the price down to earn a competitive return on investment on production. The innovator having no excess over what has to paid to investors in manufacturing, has no way to recover the cost of developing the product. The four innovations in British textile industry that were at the forefront of industrial revolution are: flying shuttle, spinning jenny, water frame, and the mule. Yet two of the innovators, John Kay (flying shuttle) and Samuel Crompton (mule) could not earn from their inventions and had to survive on French government pension or help from friends. 8.15. JUSTIFICATION OF PATENTS AND COPYRIGHT -2. The Model Corporation spends $5,000 million on research and development each year (Slide 7.8). It has to recover these expenses from future net income of the firm (Slide 7.9). If competition leaves only just enough net income from manufacturing operations to allow investors a competitive return on their investment, the company will never recover the expense on research and will have no incentive to undertake it. Governments from ancient times recognized the need to provide incentives for innovations. Agricultural and construction technologies developed under state patronage. After sixteenth century European Renaissance, European courts became active in patronage of innovators. Prizes were awarded and patents granted as rewards. They were criticized as based on favoritism than merit and a formal process of patenting began with the Venetian Statute of 1474 and English Statute of Monopolies of 1623. 8.16. JUSTIFICATION OF PATENTS AND COPYRIGHT -3. After sixteenth century European Renaissance, European courts became active in patronage of innovators. Prizes were awarded and patents granted as rewards. They were criticized as based on favoritism than merit and a formal process of patenting began with the Venetian Statute of 1474 and English Statute of Monopolies of 1623 The benefits of the patent must be balanced against the cost it imposes on the society by providing monopoly power. In addition to deadweight loss, a broad patent can restrict future innovations as the entrants can be threatened with lawsuits. Society has to continuously rebalance the benefits and costs. 8.17. POLICIES TO PROMOTE COMPETITION – 1. Public resentment against monopolies also have a long history. Recently public policies are directed at promoting competition. The expansion of markets with the transportation revolution opened the regional market of the United States and forced firms to compete nationally. Firms responded by forming cartels and Congress passed the Sherman Act of 1890. Firms found that get around the law by merging to form one firm (instead of retaining separate identities under a cartel) and Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 was enacted to extent the laws to restrict anti-competitive practices. New laws were passed later to extent the scope of these laws. The Federal Trade Commission established in 1914 and Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice empowered to enforce these laws. 8.18. POLICIES TO PROMOTE COMPETITION – 2. Economic analysis has contributed to the development of competition policies. It focused on the need to be clear of the distributional questions. Should gains to consumers and producers given equal weight? If a merger reduces fixed cost and add to profits of firms but does not affect marginal cost or price, is it acceptable? If merger increases efficiency in production, reduces marginal cost but not price (merger leads to an increase in the gap between marginal cost and price increases) is it acceptable. Should there be different policies regarding merger of firms producing the same output and merger between a firm and its supplier ( firm buying the source of raw material)? These questions are still debated. Germany, in contrast, has a policy of favoring cartels till the end of Second World War. The Treaty of Paris 8.19. POLICIES TO PROMOTE COMPETITION – 3. Germany, in contrast encouraged cartels as a way of stabilizing and controlling the economy. This policy existed till the end of Second World War. After war The Treaty of Paris that created the European Coal and Steel Community in 1951 included a number of pro-competitive measures to diminish German power by making available essential iron and coal to other European nations. The other motivation was recognition that competition is the way to attain efficiency in market allocation of resources. The competition policy of the European Union is built on the same principles. It calls for a system that does not distort internal markets and prohibits discrimination on national grounds. But it exempts cartels formed to eliminate excess capacity in a permanent way. The competition policy gives a favorable treatment to small and medium firms. The subsidies they receive from the state are not considered to affect trade and competition in the Common Market.