1
Minutes of the 77th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on 14th Nov. 2014, under the Chairpersonship Mrs. Saroj Siwatch IAS (Retd.),
Chairperson, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2
Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated
14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The Cases recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise as listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter
No. 1477 to 1479 dated 10.11.2014 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:Item No. [1] Environmental Clearance for Proposed Expansion of the Institutional
Project “Deenbandhu Chottu Ram University of Science &
Technology” located at Murthal (Sonepat) Haryana by M/S
International Foundation for Research & Education,
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the Expansion of the
Institutional Project “Deenbandhu Chottu Ram University of Science & Technology”
located at Murthal (Sonepat) Haryana with the proposal as given under:
Particulars
Plot area
Built up area
Building height
Green Area (32.49%)
No. of car parking
Power requirement
Total Water Requirement
Fresh Water
Waste water
STP capacity
RWH pits
Solid wastes generation
Existing
142614.5 sqm
326308.15 sqm
3218 ECS
HT- 844 KW
LT-324.5
646 KLD
262 KLD
328 KLD
400 KLD
2797.95 kg/day
Expansion
Total
1104791.803 sqm (273 Acres)
184602.0 sqm
327216.5 sqm
20.5 meters
32624.14 sqm
358932.29 sqm
2085 ECS
5303 ECS
HT-1744 KW
HT-800 KW (UHBVN)
LT-324.5
150 KLD
796 KLD
244 KLD
506 KLD
316 KLD
644 KLD
380 KLD
780 KLD
160 pits
76.05 kg/day
2874 kg/day
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration in the presence of representative of the project proponent and
consultant. It was noticed that the Chairman HSPCB vide letter no. HSPCB/2014/842
dated 10.10.2014 has informed that complaint against “Deenbandhu Chottu Ram
University of Science & Technology” has been filed under EPA 1986 in the Special
Environment Court Kurukshetra on 22.09.2014 for commencing construction without
obtaining prior Environmental Clearance on the recommendation of SEIAA vide letter
dated 15.10.2013 received through PS, Environment Haryana vide Memo Dated
02.12.2013. It was observed that the TOR in this case was approved on 27.12.2012 and
the project proponent on 01.06.2013 submitted EIA/EMP on the basis of approved TOR.
The base line study was carried out during March to May 2013. Detailed discussions
were held regarding, water requirement, quality of water, green belt development plan,
Ambient Air Quality, NOC from DFO regarding non-involvement of Forest land, recycle
and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. The representative of the project
2
proponent informed that presently the water demand is being met from already existing
05 number of bore wells which is registered in the revenue records. The representative of
the project proponent further clarified that this project site was developed by PWD for
C.R. State College of Engineering in 1985 and in Nov. 2006 it was up graded as
Deenbandhu Chottu Ram University of Science & Technology along with entire service
infrastructure and land. The water supply was arranged/managed by Public Health
Department through 05 number of bore wells and the same were transferred from State
college of Engineering to “Deenbandhu Chottu Ram University of Science &
Technology”. The representative of the project proponent also submitted report of
hydrologist ground water cell indicating that the availability of water is sufficient and
there is no need to install more tube-well in the campus. The representative of the project
proponent informed that they have already installed RO system for treatment of water to
make the same fit for human consumption and submitted documentary proof in respect of
the same. On query regarding storm water management the representative of the project
proponent informed that they have already develop underground tank for collection of
storm water and the same is used for watering of lawns and horticulture purpose and
submitted proof of existing storm water drainage adopted by the university. As regards
management of solid waste the representative of the project proponent informed that the
solid waste management is already in operation in the existing unit and submitted
photograph showing the operation and treatment of domestic solid waste. The
representative of the project proponent was advised to strive for canal water
supply/HUDA water supply. The representative of the project proponent also submitted
forest clearance issued by MOEF, GOI for diversion of forest land of the project area
required for access to the campus and submitted copy of Jamabandi showing that forest
land is not recorded in the project area. The representative of the project proponent was
advised to submit a plan indicating construction carried out from 2006 to 2012 and future
expansion and total water requirement with solid waste calculations. The representative
of the project proponent submitted the above entire details.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the usual conditions in practice.
Item No. [2] Environmental Clearance for the Group Housing Colony at village
Sohna, Sector-2 of Sohna, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Garg
Villas Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Group
Housing Colony at village Sohna, Sector-2 of Sohna, District-Gurgaon, Haryana on a
total plot area of 49564.38 sqm (12.25 Acres). The total built up area shall be 125876.02
sqm. The project site is divided into Pocket-A & Pocket-B services are separate for both
3
the pockets. The Group Housing Project shall comprise of 06 Towers, Tower A
(2B+S+24), Tower B (2B+S+13), Tower C1 (2B+S+18), Tower C (2B+S+13), Tower D
(2B+S+18), Tower E (2B+S+13), EWS (2B+GF+9), Club (G+1), Villas and
Commercial. The maximum height of the building shall be 110 meter. The total water
requirement shall be 660 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 400 KLD. The
waste water generation shall be 482 KLD which will be treated in the 2 STPs of Pocket-A
550 KLD + Pocket-B 24 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 3995 KVA
which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop
green belt on 34.97% of project area (22.91% tree plantation + 12.06% landscaping). The
Project Proponent proposed to construct 12 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste
generation will be 2121.04 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the
project area by adopting appropriate technology. The total parking spaces proposed are
1310 ECS.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration in the presence of representative of the project proponent and
consultant. Detailed discussions were held regarding existence of revenue rasta, water
requirement, quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC
regarding non-involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse
of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. The representative of the project proponent
submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply of water and Bank guarantee against
EDC/IDC as applicable till date paid to HUDA for the services for supply of water,
sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. The
traffic circulation plan was not found satisfactory. It was observed that in the traffic
circulation plan the project proponent has marked the revenue rasta as 12 meter wide
road. The representative of the project proponent admitted the mistake and tendered
apology for marking 12 meter wide road instead of revenue rasta. The representative of
the project proponent was advised to mark the dimensions of all the roads gates in the
project area, make provision for one additional entry and exit point, straight 6 meter wide
internal road for smooth movement of fire tender, provision for additional entry point for
ramp and provision for basement parking in the school and EWS block. The
representative of the project proponent submitted the revised plans marked “A/2” 77th
meeting making provision for one additional entry and exit point, provision of basement
parking in school and EWS block, dimensions of internal roads and gates, 6 meter wide
internal road for movement of fire tender and provision for additional entry points for
ramps.
4
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1]
The project proponent shall provide helipad facility as required under NBC norms
and shall seek permission of helipad from AAI accordingly.
[2]
The project proponent shall implement the revised the traffic circulation plan and
parking plan marked “A/2” 77th meeting dated 14.11.2014 (make provision for one
additional entry and exit point, straight 6 meter wide internal road for smooth
movement of fire tender, provision for additional entry point for ramp and
provision for basement parking in the school and EWS block).
[3]
Corporate Environment and Social Responsibility (CSER) shall be laid down by
the project proponent (2% shall be earmarked) as per guidelines of MoEF, GoI
Office Memorandum No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I) dated 18.05.2012 and Ministry
of Corporate Affairs, GoI Notification Dated 27.02.2014. A separate audit
statement shall be submitted in the compliance. Environment related work
proposed to be executed under this responsibility shall be undertaken
simultaneously. The project proponent shall select and prepare the list of the work
for implementation of CSER of its own choice and shall submit the same before
the start of construction.
[4]
The project proponent shall ensure that no construction activity is undertaken
either on surface or below or above surface of revenue rasta passing through the
project area.
[5]
The project proponent shall indicate the width and length of revenue rasta passing
through the project area on sign board and shall display the same at both the ends
of revenue rasta stretch, for awareness of public. Sign board shall also display the
message that this is public rasta/road and any citizen can use it. There shall not be
any gate with or without guards on revenue rasta further project proponent shall
not encroach revenue rasta and shall not cross internal roads over revenue rasta.
Item No. [3] Environmental Clearance for development of Group Housing under
Affordable Housing Policy 2013, at Village Dhankot, Sector-102,
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Nani Resorts and Floriculture Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Group
Housing Colony under Affordable Housing Policy 2013, at Village Dhankot, Sector-102,
Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 20234.25 sqm (5 Acres). The total built up area
shall be 57276.65 sqm. The Group Housing project shall have 9 Towers with one
Basement in each Tower, Tower 1 to 4 (G+13), Tower 5 (G+7), Tower 6 to 8 (G+13),
Tower 9 (G+8), Commercial Building, Community Hall and Creche/Anganwadi. The
maximum height of the building shall be 52.05 meter. The total water requirement shall
5
be 607 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 409 KLD. The waste water generation
shall be 503 KLD which will be treated in the STP of 600 KLD capacity. The total power
requirement shall be 3656.18 KW which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project
Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 20% of project area (10% tree
plantation + 10% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 05 rain
water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 2219 kg/day. The biodegradable waste will be treated in the project area by adopting appropriate technology.
The total parking spaces proposed are 477 ECS.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration in the presence of representative of the project proponent and
consultant. Detailed discussions were held regarding existence of revenue rasta, water
requirement, quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC
regarding non-involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse
of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. The representative of the project proponent
submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply of water and Bank guarantee against
EDC/IDC as applicable till date paid to HUDA for the services for supply of water,
sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification but failed to submit NOC from AAI regarding
height clearance. The traffic circulation plan was not found satisfactory. The
representative of the project proponent was advised to revise the traffic circulation plan
by making provision for separate entry and exit points for ramps and 6 meter wide
straight internal road for movement of fire tender. The representative of the project
proponent submitted the revised the traffic circulation plan marked “A/3” dated
14.11.2014/77th meeting. As regards NOC from AAI the representative of the project
proponent submitted a copy of letter issued by AAI informing that their office has
received complete documents required for grant of NOC and the same will be considered
in the meeting to be held shortly. The representative of the project proponent assured the
Authority to submit NOC from AAI within week.
After detailed deliberations it was decided to defer this case with the decision that
the project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the below mentioned observations
within 15 days or before next meeting.
[1]
The project proponent shall submit the NOC from AAI regarding height clearance.
Item No. [4] Environmental Clearance for development of Affordable Group
Housing Colony located in the revenue estate of Village Bhatola,
Sector-82, Faridabad by M/s S3 Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the development of
Affordable Group Housing Colony located in the revenue estate of Village Bhatola,
Sector-82, Faridabad on a plot area of 20259.543 sqm. The total built up area shall be
6
49782.172 sqm. The Group Housing project shall comprise of 3 Towers, Tower A1
(S+13), Tower A2 (S+12), Tower A3 (S+13), Community Hall, Anganwadi, Commercial
area, Podium area and Mumty & Machine room area. The maximum height of the
building shall be 44.70 meters. The total water requirement shall be 588 KLD. The fresh
water requirement shall be 393 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 482 KLD,
which will be treated in the STP of 600 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall
be 4117 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed
to develop green belt on 20.153% of project area (14% tree plantation + 6.153%
landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 05 rain water harvesting pits.
The solid waste generation will be 2129 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated
in the project area by adopting appropriate technology. The total parking spaces proposed
are 460 ECS.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration. The consultant of the project proponent submitted a copy of
letter dated 14.11.2014 requesting the SEIAA to consider their case in the next meeting
as they will not be able to attend the meeting on 14.11.2014 due to unavoidable
circumstances.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to defer this case to the next
meeting as requested by project proponent vide letter dated 14.11.2014.
Item No. [5] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony
located in the revenue estate of Village Harsaru, Sector 37 D, Gurgaon,
Manesar by M/s VS Real Projects Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Commercial Colony located in the revenue estate of Village Harsaru, Sector 37 D,
Gurgaon, Manesar on a total plot area of 15276.858 sqm (3.775 Acres). The total built up
area shall be 46096.105 sqm. The proposed project shall have 01 Tower, 3 Basements +
GF + maximum 16 Floors, (1st floor – Retail +Entertainment zone), (2nd floor –Retail +
Multiplex Level-1), (3rd floor- Multiplex level-2&3, Food Court & Night club (4th floorService floor), (5th to 15th floors offices) and (16th floor GYM and SPA). The maximum
height of the building shall be 67.10 meter. The total water requirement shall be 140
KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 38 KLD. The waste water generation shall be
120 KLD which will be treated in the STP of 175 KLD capacity. The total power
requirement shall be 4547.5 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project
Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 30% of project area (20% tree
plantation + 10% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 04 rain
water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 946 kg/day. The bio-degradable
waste will be treated in the project area by adopting appropriate technology. The total
parking spaces proposed are 588 ECS.
7
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration in the presence of representative of the project proponent and
consultant. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water,
green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of
Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic
circulation etc. The representative of the project proponent submitted the assurance of
HUDA for supply of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services
for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon
regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height
clearance. The traffic circulation plan was not satisfactory. The representative of the
project proponent was advised to provide additional entry and exit point for ramp and 6
meter wide internal road for smooth movement of fire tender. The representative of the
project proponent submitted the revised traffic circulation plan marked “A/5” 77th
meeting by making provision for entry and exit point for ramp and 6 meter wide internal
road for smooth movement of fire tender.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1]
Vertical fenestration shall not exceed 40% of total wall area.
[2]
The project proponent shall provide green area on terrace and roof top.
[3]
The project proponent shall not use fresh water for HVAC and DG cooling. Air
based HVAC system should be adopted and only treated water shall be used by
project proponent for cooling, if it is at all needed.
[4]
The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[5]
The project proponent shall implement the revised traffic circulation plan (marked
“A/5” 77th meeting.) dated 14.11.2014 (entry and exit point for ramp and 6 meter
wide internal road for smooth movement of fire tender).
[6]
Corporate Environment and Social Responsibility (CSER) shall be laid down by the
project proponent (2% shall be earmarked) as per guidelines of MoEF, GoI Office
Memorandum No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I) dated 18.05.2012 and Ministry of
Corporate Affairs, GoI Notification Dated 27.02.2014. A separate audit statement
shall be submitted in the compliance. Environment related work proposed to be
executed under this responsibility shall be undertaken simultaneously. The project
proponent shall select and prepare the list of the work for implementation of CSER
of its own choice and shall submit the same before the start of construction.
8
Item No. [6] Environmental Clearance for the Expansion of “Engineering College”
Project located at Village- Bastara, Tehsil Gharaunda, Distt. Karnal
by R.P. Educational Trust.
The SEAC has recommended this project for revision of Environmental Clearance
subject to stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the Expansion of
“Engineering College” Project located at Village- Bastara, Tehsil Gharaunda, Distt.
Karnal the project detail is as under:
Particulars
Existing
Total Plot Area
Built up Area
Green Belt
Expansion
Total
102537.22 sqm (25.3375 Acres)
25566.84 sqm
10159.62 sqm
35726.46 sqm
67% (Plantation 24.999% + Landscape 42.05%)
Proposed FAR (13 Blooks)
Height
18024.55 sqm
9934.02 sqm
21.15 meters
27958.857 sqm
Total Power requirement
262.6 KW
153.5 KW
416.1 KW (UHBVN)
Total water requirement
193 KLD
231 KLD
332 KLD
Fresh water
167 KLD
Waste water
206 KLD
STP capacity
250 KLD
Solid waste generation
Proposed Parking
RWH Pits
513.898 kg/day 708.398 kg/day
1218.898 kg/day
492 ECS
26 Pits
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration in the presence of representative of the project proponent and
consultant. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water,
green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of
forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. The
representative of the project proponent submitted copy of NOC regarding noninvolvement of forest land and permission of forest department for access to the unit from
NH-1. The representative of the project proponent informed that they are using ground
water from the existing bore-well which is registered in the revenue records. The
representative of the project proponent submitted analytical report of ground water
sample showing that the water is fit for human consumption. He further informed the
Authority that RO units have been set up in the premises for filtration of water. On query
regarding management of storm water the representative of the project proponent
informed that they have constructed underground tank of sufficient capacity for storage
of storm water and a network has been established to pump out the same in the nearby
fields for irrigation purpose.
9
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1]
Corporate Environment and Social Responsibility (CSER) shall be laid down by the
project proponent (2% shall be earmarked) as per guidelines of MoEF, GoI Office
Memorandum No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I) dated 18.05.2012 and Ministry of
Corporate Affairs, GoI Notification Dated 27.02.2014. A separate audit statement
shall be submitted in the compliance. Environment related work proposed to be
executed under this responsibility shall be undertaken simultaneously. The project
proponent shall select and prepare the list of the work for implementation of CSER
of its own choice and shall submit the same before the start of construction.
[2]
The project proponent shall provide RO System for purification of water making it
fit for drinking purpose.
[3]
The project proponent shall provide boosting arrangement and multistage pumping
with standby arrangement after getting the same approved from HUDA.
[4]
The project proponent shall manage segregation of solid waste of different
categories at initial collecting point itself and shall dispose off as per MSW rules.
Item No. [7] Revision of Environmental Clearance granted for construction of
“Commercial Complex” at Village Shikhopur, Sector-83, NH-8,
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s KLJ Realtech Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for revision of Environmental Clearance
subject to stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the Revision of
Environmental Clearance granted for construction of “Commercial Complex” at Village
Shikhopur, Sector-83, NH-8, Gurgaon, Haryana on a plot area of 14390.62 sqm (3.556
Acres). The revision in the Environment Clearance letter proposed by the project
proponent is as under:
Particulars
Total Plot Area
Existing as per EC
Proposed Revision
14390.62 sqm (3.556 Acres)
Remarks
No change
Ground Coverage
3194.6 sqm
4600.29 sqm
Increased
Built up Area
105316.57 sqmt
116507.86 sqm.
Increased
Green Belt (20%)
2792.33 sqm
2038.69 sqm
Decrease
No. of Floors
3B+GF+11 Floors
3B+GF+12 Floors
Increased
No. of Blocks
Height
1 Block
41 meter
1 Block
59.90 meter
No change
Increased
Total Power requirement
3600 KVA
6142 KVA (DHBVN)
Increased
Total water requirement
28.90 KLD
216 KLD
Increased
Fresh water
177 KLD
80 KLD
Decrease
Waste water
83 KLD
142 KLD
Increased
STP capacity
100 KLD
280 KLD
Increased
Solid waste generation
510 kg/day
748 kg/day
Increased
10
Proposed Parking
RWH Pits
493 ECS
2 pits
3 pits
Increased
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration in the presence of representative of the project proponent and
consultant. It was observed that the proposal is regarding revision/expansion of
environment clearance already granted by SEIAA vide letter no. SEIAA/HR/2010/1477
dated 21.01.2010. It was noticed that the environmental clearance was accorded to M/s
Uppal Housing Ltd. against license no. 48 of 2008 granted to M/s .Botil Oil Tools India
Pvt. Ltd. C/o M/s Uppal Housing Ltd.; whereas the said license was transferred in the
name of M/s Saumya Realtech Pvt. Ltd. by Town and Country Planning Department on
03.05.2013 and no request to transfer the EC letter in favour of M/s Saumya Realtech
Pvt. Ltd. was made by M/s Uppal Housing Ltd. The name of M/s Saumya Realtech Pvt.
Ltd. was changed to M/s KLJ Realtech Pvt. Ltd. as per certificate issued by Ministry of
Corporate affairs in March 2014. It was also noticed that the validity of environmental
clearance granted to M/s Uppal Housing Ltd. is up to 20.01.2015. The representative of
the project proponent informed that they have not started the construction at site and shall
start the construction only after the grant of EC for revision/expansion by the SEIAA.
The Authority advised the project proponent to submit fresh application as no
construction has been undertaken and the EC already granted is going to expire on
20.01.2015 i.e. after 2 months. The representative of the project proponent informed that
they will submit application for extension of validity well in time and requested to
consider their case of revision/expansion of project. The representative of the consultant
was asked that the responsible person in the consultancy organization should furnish
undertaking on non-judicial stamp paper stating that no construction has been started at
the site and also submit latest photographs of the site.
The representative of the
consultant assured to submit the same within two days.
After detailed deliberations it was decided to defer this case with the decision that
the project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the below mentioned observations
within 15 days or before next meeting.
[1]
The project proponent shall submit application from M/s Uppal Housing Ltd. for
transfer of EC letter in the name of M/s KLJ Realtech Pvt. Ltd.
[2]
The project proponent shall submit an undertaking on non-judicial stamp paper
from M/s Uppal Housing Ltd. declaring that no construction at the site was started
by them and the entire responsibility of the implementation of conditions of the
EC letter now lies with M/s KLJ Realtech Pvt. Ltd.
[3]
The project proponent shall submit certified copy of monitoring report issued by
RO, MOEF, GOI Chandigarh.
11
[4]
The consultant of the project proponent shall submit an undertaking on nonjudicial stamp paper stating that no construction has been started at the site and
also submit latest photographs of the site.
Item No. [8] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony
located at Village Hayatpur, Sector-95 A, District-Gurgaon, Haryana
by Sh. Mahendra Kumar Gupta.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Commercial Colony located at Village Hayatpur, Sector-95 A, District-Gurgaon, on a
plot area of 12444.063 sqm (3.075 Acres). The total built up area shall be 35334.025
sqm. The proposed project shall comprise of 03 Basements + Stilt + GF + Maximum 09
Floors. The maximum height of the building shall be 40.40 meters. The total water
requirement shall be 175 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 72 KLD. The waste
water generation shall be 114 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 140 KLD
capacity.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration in the presence of representative of the project proponent and
consultant. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water,
green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of
Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic
circulation etc. The representative of the project proponent submitted the assurance of
HUDA for supply of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services
for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon
regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height
clearance. The traffic circulation plan was not legible and also not satisfactory as the
proposed internal roads were of not sufficient width for smooth movement of vehicles
and fire tender. The representative of the project proponent was advised to provide
additional exit point, entry point towards ramp shifting of few parking places to make the
internal road more comfortable for turning of vehicles and movement of fire tender. The
representative of the project proponent submitted plan marked “A/8” 77th meeting dated
14.11.2014 (provide additional exit point, entry point towards ramp shifting of few
parking places to make the internal road more comfortable for turning of vehicles and
movement of fire tender). It was observed that the project proponent has already
submitted application with the District Wild Life Warden regarding NOC and also
submitted application to the Wild Life Division MOEF, GOI for grant of clearance from
NBWL Standing Committee. The case was examined in the light of MOEF, GOI OM J11013/41/2006-IA-II(I)(part) dated 20.08.2014 and it was made clear to the
representative of the project proponent that the EC shall only be issued on the receipt of
NOC from District Wild Life Warden indicating that the project area does not fall in the
12
Protected Area of ECO, Sensitive Zone (Sultanpur National Park) or clearance from
Standing Committee of NBWL as per the procedure prescribed in the referred OM.
After detailed deliberations it was decided to defer this case with the decision that
the project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the below mentioned observations
within 15 days or before next meeting.
[1]
The project proponent shall submit NOC from District Wild Life Warden
indicating that the project area does not fall in the Notified Protected Area of
ECO, Sensitive Zone (Sultanpur National Park) or clearance from Standing
Committee of NBWL.
Item No. [9] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Commercial Colony” at
Sector-70A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Red Topaz Real Estate Pvt.
Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Residential “Commercial Colony” at Sector-70A, Gurgaon, Haryana, on a plot area of
16187.29 sqm (04 Acres). The proposed total built up area shall be 48145 sqm. The
proposed project shall have 01 Block, 02 Basements + GF + 11 floors. The Group
Housing project shall have 80 Guest rooms, 146 Shops, 45 Offices, 3 Star Hotel Rooms
and Restaurant etc. The maximum height of the building shall be 46.15 meters. The total
water requirement shall be 323 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 183 KLD. The
waste water generation shall be 147 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 180 KLD
capacity. The total power requirement shall be 2957 KW which will be supplied by
DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 20% of project
area (15% tree plantation + 5% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to
construct 04 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 690 kg/day.
The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by adopting appropriate
technology. The total parking spaces proposed are 680 ECS.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration in the presence of representative of the project proponent and
consultant. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water,
green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of
Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic
circulation etc. The representative of the project proponent submitted the assurance of
HUDA for supply of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services
for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon
regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height
clearance. The traffic circulation plan and the parking plan were not found in order. The
representative of the project proponent was advised to provide straight internal road of
7.5 meter for smooth movement of fire tender. The representative of the project
13
proponent was submitted the revised traffic circulation plan marked ‘A/9’ 77th meeting
dated 14.11.2014.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1]
The project proponent shall implement the revised the traffic circulation plan
marked “A/9” 77th meeting dated 14.11.2014 (provide straight internal road of 7.5
meter for smooth movement of fire tender).
[2]
Vertical fenestration shall not exceed 40% of total wall area.
[3]
The project proponent shall provide green area on terrace and roof top.
[4]
The project proponent shall not use fresh water for HVAC and DG cooling. Air
based HVAC system should be adopted and only treated water shall be used by
project proponent for cooling, if it is at all needed.
[5]
The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[6]
Corporate Environment and Social Responsibility (CSER) shall be laid down by the
project proponent (2% shall be earmarked) as per guidelines of MoEF, GoI Office
Memorandum No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I) dated 18.05.2012 and Ministry of
Corporate Affairs, GoI Notification Dated 27.02.2014. A separate audit statement
shall be submitted in the compliance. Environment related work proposed to be
executed under this responsibility shall be undertaken simultaneously. The project
proponent shall select and prepare the list of the work for implementation of CSER
of its own choice and shall submit the same before the start of construction.
Item No. [10] Environmental Clearance for proposed construction of Dairy plant at
plot no. 921-922, Sector-68, IMT-Faridabad, Haryana by M/s
Banaskantha Dist. Co-op. Milk Producer’s Union Ltd.
This case was considered in the 75th meeting of the SEIAA held on 15.09.2014
wherein it was decided to defer this case with the decision that the project proponent may
be asked to submit reply to the below mentioned observations within 15 days or before
next meeting.
[1]
The representative of the project proponent shall submit water requirement,
sullage calculations. The project proponent shall submit revised water balance
diagram.
[2]
The representative of the project proponent shall submit details to minimize the
use of fresh water by reusing the treated effluent as far as possible and shall
submit parameters of final discharge keeping in view the prescribed norms.
[3]
The project proponent shall submit the calculations for parking requirement and its
provision as per norms with plans.
[4]
The representative of the project proponent was asked to submit validity of
consultant beyond February 2014.
14
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 31.10.2014 submitted by project proponent
was considered in the presence of representative of the project proponent. It was noticed
that the project proponent has submitted the water requirement, sullage calculations,
revised water balance diagram, details to minimize the use of fresh water by reusing the
treated effluent, parking requirement and calculations and validity of consultancy
organization beyond 2014 and an undertaking of consultancy organization stating that
NABET/QCI has granted accreditation to their firm for providing environment
consultancy services beyond Feb. 2014 but the project proponent failed to supply copy of
reply to the members. The representative of the project proponent submitted additional
copy of reply to the members in the meeting.
After detail deliberation it was decided to take up the case in the next meeting. The
decision of the Authority was also conveyed to the representative of the project
proponent present in the meeting.
Item No. [11] Environmental Clearance for “Integrated Municipal Solid Waste
Management Facility” at Sandal Kalan, Sonepat by Municipal
Counsil, Sonepat.
The SEAC in its 112th meeting held on 19.09.2014 has recommended to de-list
this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to submit the EIA report on
the basis of approved TOR in spite of lapse of one year despite issuance of various letters
and final notice. In the absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the
project for the environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent on 29.05.2013 submitted application for the
proposed development of “Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility” at
Sandal Kalan, Sonepat. The SEAC in its 86th meeting held on 09.07.2013 approved the
TOR required for preparation of EIA/EMP as per the requirement of procedure of EIA
Notification. The Secretary SEAC vide letter dated 15.07.2013 conveyed the approved
TOR and advised the project proponent to submit the EIA/EMP within prescribed period
but the project proponent failed to submit the EIA/EMP on the basis of approved TOR.
The Secretary SEAC vide letter no. 1490 dated 17.07.2014 issued final notice to the
project proponent for submission of desired information within 15 days but the project
proponent failed to submit the same.
Finding no reason to disagree with recommendations of SEAC in this case the
Authority decided to de-list this case. It was also decided that the decision of the
Authority should be conveyed to the Project Proponent and copy of the same be
forwarded to the Haryana State Pollution Control Board, DGTCP, Haryana & R.O.
MOEF, GOI for information and necessary action.
15
Item No. [12] Environmental Clearance for the proposed Expansion of Commercial
Shed located at Plot No. 33, Sector-5, IMT Bawal, Rewari, Haryana
by M/s Gmax Auto Ltd.
The SEAC has referred this case to the SEIAA with the recommendation for
initiating further legal action. The SEAC has considered the project proposal in its 112th
meeting held on 19.09.2014 considered the site visit report of sub-committee of SEAC
and noticed that the project proponent had started construction of the “Expansion of
Commercial Shed” without obtaining prior Environmental Clearance which amounts to
violation of EIA Notification dated 14-09-2006. The project proponent on 05.08.2014
submitted the copy of resolution ensuring that violation of provisions of the Environment
(Protection) Act, 1986 will not be repeated in future and also admitted its mistake for
carrying out construction without obtaining prior Environmental Clearance.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC in this case was examined in
the light of MoEF, GoI OM no. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II (1) dated 12-12-2012. After
detailed deliberations it was decided that:[1]
The Principal Secretary Environment may be requested to initiate credible action
on the violation by invoking powers under Section 19 of the Environment
(Protection)Act,1986, for taking necessary legal action under Section 15 of the Act
for the period for which the violation has taken place, against the M/s Gmax Auto
Ltd., Plot No. 33, Sector-5, IMT Bawal, District Rewari, Haryana for commencing
construction of Expansion of Commercial Shed located at Plot No. 33, Sector-5,
IMT Bawal, Rewari, Haryana without obtaining prior Environmental Clearance
under EIA Notification14-09-2006. The Principal Secretary Environment may
also be requested to provide the evidence of credible action taken against the
project proponent.
[2]
The Principal Secretary Environment may be requested to issue directions under
Section 5 of EPA Act, 1986 to the project proponent in respect of violations, as
per the requirement of MoEF, GoI, OM No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I) dated
27.06.2013.
Item No. [13] Environment Clearance for proposed Eye Hospital located at VillageUllahawas, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by Rajiv Gandhi Charitable
Trust.
This case was considered in the 75th meeting of the SEIAA held on 15.09.2014
wherein it was decided to defer this case to the next meeting on the request of project
proponent with the decision that the project proponent shall submit the reply to the
observation raised by SEIAA before next meeting.
[1]
The project proponent shall submit the building/layout plan conforming to t he
zoning plan.
[2]
The project proponent shall earmark the project area on the HUDA sector plan
showing its connectivity with the HUDA trunk lines/roads.
16
[3]
The project proponent shall seek permission of competent authority for use of
revenue rasta for the purpose of access to the units and laying of infrastructure
services such as water supply, sewerage and storm drainage lines besides power
supply system.
[4]
The project proponent shall submit EDC/IDC proof with undertaking that nothing
is due.
[5]
The project proponent shall submit Bio-medical waste management scheme and
MOU with authorized vendor.
[6]
The project proponent shall submit the details of ETP and revised water balance
diagram.
[7]
The project proponent shall revise the parking plan as per norms required for
Hospital project and shall submit the details along with plans.
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 07.11.2014 submitted by project proponent
was considered in the presence of representative of the project proponent and consultant.
It was noticed that the Town and Country Planning Department vide drawing no.
DGTCP/4959 dated 17.10.2014 has revised the zoning plan of Eye Hospital for which
CLU permission have been granted to the project proponent. It was observed that with
the revision of the zoning plan the entire salient features of the proposed project has
considerably changed i.e. plot area, ground coverage, water requirement, services
infrastructure, traffic movement, location of STP, drainage system etc. The representative
of the project proponent also submitted revised Form I, Forma IA and Conceptual plan.
The Authority was of the firm view that as the entire features of the project have changed
due to revision of zoning plan therefore the fresh appraisal and recommendation of SEAC
on the revised project proposal is required.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to appraise the revised project proposal on the basis of revised zoning
plan and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [14] Environmental Clearance for proposed Expansion project at VillageBaldi, Tikri, Kailash & Unchana, Sector- 28A & 29, District- Karnal
by M/S Alpha G Corp. Development Pvt. Ltd.
The representation of project proponent claiming deemed Environmental
Clearance of their project and recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration
in the today’s meeting. The SEAC in its meeting held on 29.01.2013 observed that the
project proponent had claimed deemed environmental clearance of their project and the
committee is not required to re-appraise this case at this stage in view of the
affidavit/representation of the project proponent claiming that the company considers the
environmental clearance deemed to have been granted as per the MOEF GOI Notification
dated 14.09.2006.
17
The above recommendation of SEAC was considered in the 76th meeting of
SEIAA held on 14.10.2014 wherein it was observed that the EAC of MoEF GoI has
recommended the project for environmental clearance in its 103rd meeting held on
13th/15th July, 2011 but the competent accepting Authority raised observations regarding
details of compliance of EC conditions of the existing township for which EC was issued
in June, 2008 and no further action was taken and the file was transferred to SEIAA. It
was noticed that the project proponent has already submitted the certified copy of
compliance report. The representative of the project proponent further explained that they
are regularly submitting the six monthly compliance reports of the entire project to the
Regional Office, MoEF, GoI. The representative of the project proponent was advised to
submit the copies of all the six monthly compliance reports submitted to the RO, MoEF,
GoI, project details along with plans and latest certified copy of compliance report and
circulate the same to the members of SEIAA.
The reply dated 16.10.2014 submitted by the project proponent was considered in
the today’s meeting. The project proponent assured that infrastructure provided caters to
the requirement of water supply, sewerage, storm drainage and STP based on water
supply@ of 135 lpcd. The representative of the project proponent also assured that
infrastructure provided shall cater to others lands where ever required. The representative
of the project proponent submitted a copy of letter dated 14.10.2014 issued by Regional
office of Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change confirming that the
project proponent is regularly submitting six monthly compliance reports.
After detailed deliberation the Authority decided to accept the recommendation of
SEAC that the project proposal qualifies for deemed clearance as claimed by the project
proponent and re-appraisal of project is not required at this stage.
Item No. [15] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Industrial Unit”
(Unit-VIII) at Plot No-37, Sector-4B, IE, HSIIDC, Dist-Jhajjar,
Bahadurgarh, Haryana by M/s Relaxo Footwears Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
“Industrial Unit” (Unit-VIII) at Plot No-37, Sector-4B, IE, HSIIDC, Dist-Jhajjar,
Bahadurgarh, Haryana on a plot area of 20250 sqm. The total built up area shall be
35437.5 sqm. The proposed project shall comprise 01 Block + GF + 03 Floors. The
maximum height of the building shall be 26 meters. The total water requirement shall be
111 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 33 KLD. The waste water generation
shall be 83 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 100 KLD capacity.
In the 76th meeting of SEIAA held on 14.10.2014 the recommendation of SEAC
and the project details were taken up for consideration wherein the consultant of the
project proponent submitted a copy of letter dated 13.10.2014 requesting the SEIAA to
18
consider their case in the next meeting as they will not be able to attend the meeting on
14.10.2014 due to unavoidable circumstances. Accordingly the case was deferred.
In the today’s meeting also the project proponent requested to defer their case to
the next meeting. The recommendation of SEAC was considered in the absence of
representative of the project proponent. It was observed that HSIIDC vide drawing no.
HSIIDC/IPD/296 dated 16.07.2009 has approved the revised zoning plan of plot no. 36,
37 and 39, Sector-4B, Bahadurgarh and a condition has been impose that the project
proponent shall obtain the clearance/NOC as per the provision of Notification dated
14.09.2006 issued by MOEF, GOI before starting construction at site. The regular letter
of allotment of plot number 37 Sector 4B, Bahadurgarh was issued to Relaxo Footwears
on 01.07.2010. The occupation certificates dated 17.12.2012 and 17.10.2013issued by
HSIIDC reveals that the project proponent had started the construction of building
without obtaining prior environmental clearance. The details submitted by project
proponent shows that the total built up area is 35437.50 sqm and the project proponent
had already constructed 18542.92 sqm of area.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to inspect the site to access the status of construction in the light of above
observation and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [16] Environmental Clearance for proposed project “Avalon Rangoli” a
proposed group housing colony promoted at Sector-24, TehsilDharuhera, District- Rewari, Haryana by M/S Swiftrans
International Pvt. Ltd.
This case was considered in the 76th meeting of the SEIAA held on 14.10.2014
wherein the representative of the project proponent present failed to appear before the
authority for presentation. A telephonic massage was received from Sh. D.K.Yadav, the
project proponent requesting to take up this case in the next meeting. After detail
deliberation it was decided to take up this case in the next meeting as per the request of
the project proponent accordingly the case was deferred.
In the today’s meeting the representative of the project proponent appeared before
Authority for presentation of the case. It was observed that the project proponent has
engaged M/s Team Institute of Science and Technology for providing consultancy
services. The status of accreditation of the consultant with the NABET/QCI was not clear
as the consultant was not present in the meeting. The representative of the project
proponent was advised to come along with consultant in the next meeting.
After detailed deliberations it was decided to defer this case with the decision that
the consultant engaged by the project proponent should appear before the Authority in the
next meeting with authentic document of consultant.
19
Item No. [17] Environmental Clearance for proposed Residential Plotted Colony
“Emerald Hills”, Village Badshahpur, Maidawas, Nangli Umarpur,
Sec-62 & 65, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Emaar MGF Land Ltd.
This case was considered in the 76th meeting of the SEIAA held on 13.10.2014
wherein it was decided to defer this case with the decision that the project proponent may
be asked to submit reply to the below mentioned observations within 15 days or before
next meeting.
[1]
The project proponent shall submit legible layout plan of the project area showing
existence of revenue rasta and also ensuring that the revenue rasta is not
intercepted or submit permission of competent authority for crossing over the
revenue rasta for laying of services.
[2]
The project proponent shall submit detail statement of different blocks giving their
water, sewerage and STP requirement.
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 10.11.2014 submitted by project proponent
was taken up in the presence of representative of the project proponent It was observed
that the project proponent has engaged M/s Building Envirotech Pvt. Ltd. for providing
consultancy services but the consultant was not present in the meeting. The representative
of the project proponent was advised to come along with consultant in the next meeting.
The representative of the project proponent made a request to put their case in the next
meeting of SEIAA so that consultant is present during the appraisal process.
After detailed deliberations it was decided to defer this case with the decision that
the consultant engaged by the project proponent should appear before the Authority in the
next meeting.
Item No. [18] Environmental Clearance for the Warehouse project at Village
Mubarakpur, Tehsil Farukh Nagar, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
Regent Build Well (P) Ltd.
This case was considered in the 76th meeting of the SEIAA held on 13.10.2014
wherein the Authority acceded to the request of project proponent and decided to defer
this case to the next meeting for want of corrected layout plan conforming to the zoning
plan.
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 10.11.2014 submitted by project proponent
was considered in the presence of representative of the project proponent and consultant.
It was noticed that the project proponent has submitted the correct layout plan
conforming to the zoning plan. Detailed discussions were held regarding existence of
revenue rasta, HT line, water requirement, quality of water, green belt development plan,
Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli Notification dated
07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. The
representative of the project proponent informed that they will store Electronics and
consumer durables Automobile parts, Agriculture and Pharmaceuticals product,
Electronic goods item and submitted an undertaking in this regard. The representative of
20
the project proponent informed that the water demand of 23.2 KLD will be met through
tankers and suitable remedial measures shall be adopted to make the water fit for human
consumption. The representative of the project proponent further clarified that they will
construct 12 RWH pits.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following conditions in addition to the usual conditions in practice
[1]
The project proponent shall ensure that no construction activity is undertaken
either on surface or below or above surface of revenue rasta passing through the
project area.
[2]
The project proponent shall indicate the width and length of revenue rasta passing
through the project area on sign board and shall display the same at both the ends
of revenue rasta stretch, for awareness of public. Sign board shall also display the
message that this is public rasta/road and any citizen can use it. There shall not be
any gate with or without guards on revenue rasta further project proponent shall
not encroach revenue rasta and shall not cross internal roads over revenue rasta.
[3]
The project proponent shall not raise any construction activity in the ROW
reserved/acquired for High Tension Wire passing through the project area and
shall maintain horizontal and vertical ROW as required under Indian Electricity
Rules, 1956/DHBVN latest instructions.
[4]
The Project Proponent as stated in the proposal shall construct total 12 rain water
harvesting pits for recharging the ground water within the project premises. Rain
water harvesting pits shall be designed to make provisions for silting chamber and
removal of floating matter before entering harvesting pit. Maintenance budget and
persons responsible for maintenance must be provided. Care shall also be taken
that contaminated water do not enter any RWH pit.
[5]
The project proponent shall strengthen and maintain the village approach road in
front of the proposed warehouse at their own cost after taking approval from the
relevant authority.
[6]
The project proponent shall provide RO System for purification of water making it
fit for drinking purpose.
[7]
The project proponent shall store only agro based products in the warehouse.
[8]
The project proponent shall install STP of 05 KLD for treatment of waste water.
[9]
Pollution control measures for oil/diesel waste due to large no of Trucks
involved in transportation shall be made.
[10]
The project proponent shall get approval of scheme for firefighting from the
concerned Authority before commissioning the project.
21
[11]
The project proponent shall control fugitive emission due to loading,
unloading and other operations. In no case any truck/other vehicle should be
parked on the road side.
[12]
The project proponent shall dispose off excess of Sewage/storm water during rains
at appropriate place after taking prior approval of competent authority.
[13]
The project proponent shall use only treated water for Horticulture.
[14]
Corporate Environment and Social Responsibility (CSER) shall be laid down by
the project proponent (2% shall be earmarked) as per guidelines of MoEF, GoI
Office Memorandum No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I) dated 18.05.2012 and Ministry
of Corporate Affairs, GoI Notification Dated 27.02.2014. A separate audit
statement shall be submitted in the compliance. Environment related work
proposed to be executed under this responsibility shall be undertaken
simultaneously. The project proponent shall select and prepare the list of the work
for implementation of CSER of its own choice and shall submit the same before
the start of construction
Item No. [19] Environmental Clearance for construction of Hospital & School
project at Plot No. 1, Sector-16, Faridabad, Haryana by
Vivekananda Ashrama Society.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Super
specialty Hospital & School project at Plot No. 1, Sector-16, Faridabad, Haryana, on a
plot area of 20028.65 sqm. The total built up area of School and Hospital is 39261.82
sqm (School- 6680.632 sqm + Hospital 32581.188 sqm). The project have Block A,
Block B, Block C1, Block C2 (School), Kitchen, link corridor with stilt and 02 level
Basements. The maximum height of the building is 22.10 meters. The capacity of the
Hospital is proposed as 325 Beds. The project proponent has proposed to provide OPD
Services, clinical Services, Nursing Services, Paramedical services, Operational services.
The project proponent has provided one School with Hostel in the complex. The total
water requirement shall be 376 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 214 KLD. The
domestic waste water generation shall be 74 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of
100 KLD capacity. The waste water generation from the Hospital building will be 137.48
KLD which will be treated in the ETP of 165 KLD capacity. The treated waste water
from the STP shall be recycled reused for flushing, horticulture, DG cooling, HVAC
makeup leading to zero discharge. The waste water from ETP shall be recycled for
flushing and excess of treated waste water shall be discharge in municipal sever. The
total power requirement shall be 3125 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The
Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 21.57% of project area (16.57%
tree plantation + 5% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 05 rain
water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 1068 kg/day. The bio-
22
degradable waste will be treated in the project area by adopting appropriate technology.
The total parking spaces proposed are 95 ECS.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration in the presence of representative of the project proponent and
consultant. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water,
green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of
Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. The
representative of the project proponent submitted the assurance of Municipal Corporation
of Faridabad for supply of water and NOC from DFO regarding non-involvement of
Forest land. On query the representative of the project proponent informed that the
Vivekananda Ashrama have never been interrogated or summoned by CBI in any case
related to their project site. The parking plan submitted by the project proponent was not
found satisfactory as no provision was made for additional parking in near future due to
increase in footfalls and occupied bed strength of Hospital. The representative of the
project proponent informed that the parking provision is as per norms however they will
make provision for additional parking as and when the same is required in near future.
The representative of the project proponent submitted parking plan marked ‘A/19’ 77th
earmarking space for future parking. The representative of the project proponent was
advised to submit legible copy of allotment letter, zoning plan, list of trustees of
Vivekananda Ashrama and Directors of QRG, application in the name of Vivekananda
Ashrama and all the documents duly signed and in the name of Vivekananda Ashrama.
The representative of the project proponent submitted the entire records as above. It was
observed that the Directors of QRG and trustee of Vivekananda Ashrama are the same.
The Authority also made it clear that this environmental clearance case shall be limited to
the issue concerning the environment and all other issues like ownership of land, lease of
land, purpose of the lease for allotment of land by HUDA, FAR covered and allowed of
any other connected issue and any other legal issue/court case etc. will be decided and
considered by the concerned competent authority only.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following conditions in addition to the usual conditions in practice
[1]
The project proponent shall provide sound reduction techniques during day time.
[2]
The project proponent shall dispose of Bio-Medical waste as per BioMedical (Management & Handling) rules 1998.
[3]
The project proponent is responsible for compliance of all conditions in
Environmental Clearance letter and project proponent can not absolve
himself /herself of the responsibility by shifted it to any contractor engaged by
project proponent.
23
[4]
The green space (21%) of plot area shall be developed before the project site is
revisited after removal of all deficiencies by end of November, 2014.
[5]
The environment clearance granted to the Vivekanand Ashram Society under the
EPA 1986/Environment Impact Assessment Notification dated 14.09.2006 shall
not create or confer any right to Land use of project site for establishment of
proposed Super/Multi Specialty Hospital which is exclusively within the purview
of Chief Administrator HUDA, Panchkula and binding upon the Society.
[6]
All zoning violations outside the building line shall be removed and PP shall not
create any grade separation between the building line & outer boundary wall. This
shall conform to approve drawing No. DTP (F 2209/03 dated 20.06.2003.
Unauthorized entry/exit facing north side (Sector-18) shall be removed &
boundary wall reconstructed as per approved design.
[7]
The environmental clearance granted shall be limited to the issue concerning the
environment and all other issues like ownership of land, lease of land, purpose of
the lease for allotment of land by HUDA, FAR covered and allowed of any other
connected issue and any other legal issue/court case etc. will be decided and
considered by the concerned competent authority only.
[8]
The project proponent shall provide free medical-aid to 2% of the poor patients as
per the assurance given to the Authority.
[9]
The project proponent shall implement parking plan marked ‘A/19’ 77th
(earmarking space for future parking).
[10]
Corporate Environment and Social Responsibility (CSER) shall be laid down by the
project proponent (2% shall be earmarked) as per guidelines of MoEF, GoI Office
Memorandum No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I) dated 18.05.2012 and Ministry of
Corporate Affairs, GoI Notification Dated 27.02.2014. A separate audit statement
shall be submitted in the compliance. Environment related work proposed to be
executed under this responsibility shall be undertaken simultaneously. The project
proponent shall select and prepare the list of the work for implementation of CSER
of its own choice and shall submit the same before the start of construction.
[11]
Vertical fenestration shall not exceed 40% of total wall area.
[12]
The project proponent shall provide green area on terrace and roof top.
[13]
The project proponent shall not use fresh water for HVAC and DG cooling. Air
based HVAC system should be adopted and only treated water shall be used by
project proponent for cooling, if it is at all needed.
[14]
The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
24
Court Case :
Item No. [20]Hon’able Delhi high court orders dated 22.09.2014 passed in LPA no.
547/2014 “The Haryana State Environment Impact Assessment
Authority and ANR V/s M/s Maruti Suzuki India Limited ANR”.
The Hon’ble Delhi High Court Order dated 22.09.2014 passed in LPA no.
547/2014 and action taken by SEIAA was taken up for discussion in the today’s meeting.
It was noticed that M/s Maruti Suzuki India Limited filed a petition WP(C) 2066/2014 in
the Hon’ble Delhi High Court. M.S.SEIAA being respondent, in the said case filed reply
through Sh. Manjeet Singh, Addl. Advocate General at New Delhi. The Hon’ble High
Court on 26.05.2014 passed the orders in this case.
Background of the case and orders dated 26.05.2014:
M/s Maruti Sukuki India Ltd. On 19.02.2013 submitted application for
Environment Clearance for expansion of Industrial Building for testing of vehicles (R &
D Centre) at Plot No. 1, Sector-33 B-33C IMT, Rohtak under MOEF GOI EIA
Notification dated 14.09.2006. The application was addressed to Member Secretary, State
Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) Haryana as per the requirement of
procedure prescribed in the Notification. The SEIAA forwarded this application
submitted by the project proponent under category 8 (a) of EIA Notification to State
Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for appraisal and recommendation. The SEAC in its
87th meeting held on 22.07.2013 recommended the project for environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the 59th meeting, 62nd
meeting and 67th meeting of SEIAA held on 18.10.2013, 18.12.2013 & 28.02.2014. It
was observed by the SEIAA that the project proponent has commenced the construction
of project without obtaining prior environmental clearance thus violated the provisions of
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. The case was examined in the light of
guidelines/procedure given in the MoEF GoI OM Dated 12.12.2012. As per the
guidelines the PS, Environment vide letter dated 12.03.2014 was requested to initiate
legal action against the project proponent under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and
send the credible action taken report. Simultaneously the project proponent was also
advised to submit Board of Directors Resolution, resolving that they admit its mistake for
carrying out construction of the project without obtaining prior environment clearance
and such violation shall not be repeated in future.
The project proponent challenged the decision of SEIAA in the Hon’ble Delhi
High Court. The proper reply was filed by SEIAA (R-2). The Hon’ble Delhi high court
disposed off the petition on 26.05.2014 and passed orders to be complied with both the
parties. The petitioner in the petition challenged the applicability of EIA Notification in
respect of construction of Industrial Building. During the course of hearing on the basis
25
of statement given by State Counsel the petitioner also submitted an undertaking to seek
ex-post facto Environmental Clearance for their projects in the State of Haryana.
Directions contained in orders:
(a)
EIA Notification 2006 applies to all projects with a built up area of >20,000 sqm
irrespective of nature of the project and activity. Omission of some
words/expressions from the draft EIA Notification 2006, which are superfluous,
would not assist the petitioners. Moreover, deletion of words/expressions from a
draft Notification is not equivalent to a deletion of noting of Government
officials cannot be a guide to interpretation when the Notification is otherwise free
from ambiguity
(b)
The SEIAA (R-2) to consider petitioner application for grant of ex-post facto
Environment Clearance for their projects in Haryana.
(c)
The petitioner cannot be said to have acted malafide intent in not applying for
prior Environment Clearance as firstly there was no authoritative judgment on the
said issue and secondly, upon the petitioner being asked to seek prior Environment
clearance, despite its bona fide belief that EIA Notification, 2006 was not
applicable to its projects.
(d)
The respondents are directed not to initiate any criminal action against the
petitioner and/or its Board Member/Officials.
(e)
The Court reiterates that present order has been passed on the peculiar facts and
circumstances of this case and the same shall not be treated as a precedent.
Misleading Statement given by Addl.AG Sh. Manjeet singh
It was noticed that the State Counsel Mr. Manjeet Singh Addl. AG engaged to
defend the case on behalf of SEIAA has given a statement on his own against the stand
taken by SEIAA in their replies. His stand was totally illegal and against the prevalent
provision of law applicable in this case ,which led to passing of erroneous orders. It is
further pertinent to mention that Mr. Manjeet Singh the state counsel was rather briefed
in detail as per reply and stand taken by SEIAA. The statement given by the Counsel was
not in accordance with the existing relevant law and procedure of EIA Notification, and
also this statement was not in the knowledge of the SEIAA. The State Counsel Mr.
Manjeet Singh, Addl. AG never informed/apprised this office about the date of the
hearing in the Court in this case and no official from this office was present in the Court.
The statement given by Mr. Manjeet Singh Addl. AG do not conform to the reply filed by
SEIAA, no where it is mentioned that SEIAA would consider not initiating any criminal
action against the petitioner for not procuring prior Environment Clearance provided the
petitioner undertake that they will obtain ex-post facto Environment Clearance and shall
comply with the terms and conditions stipulated in the Environment Clearance.
Accordingly it was decided to write to AG, Haryana for initiating action against Sh.
26
Manjeet Singh, Addl. AG as he gave a wrong statement in the Hon’ble Court which
resulted in passing of such orders. The SEIAA vide letter no. SEIAA/HR/2014/855 dated
23.06.2014 requested AG, Haryana to initiate action against Sh. Manjeet Singh Addl. AG
for making wrong statement before the Hon’ble High Court but no action has been taken
by AG, Haryana in the case as yet.
A decision was also taken to file LPA in the matter. The O/o SEIAA took the
opinion/advise of LR, Department for filing the LPA against the orders in the Hon’ble
Court. The LPA was filed in the Hon’ble Court on 19.08.2014. The Hon’ble Delhi High
Court on 22.09.2014 finally dismissed the appeal as the Hon’ble Court do not find any
merit in the appeal. This office on 01.10.2014 submitted the file for seeking the opinion
of LR on the following issues:
1. Whether the SEIAA should file SLP in the Hon’ble Supreme Court against the
orders or not?
2. If no, impact of the orders on other similar cases.
3. In the absence of provision in the Notification, can, SEIAA consider granting
ex-post facto environmental clearance in this case.
LR now on 07.11.2014 has referred back the case to Administrative Branch with
the advice to first obtain the comments of the AG, Haryana in the matter at the earliest, so
that necessary advice in the matter can be tendered by their Department. After decision of
the query raised at point-1, advice can only be tendered on the queries/points raised at
point-2 & 3 above. The file is under action for seeking advice of AG, Haryana. It was
observed that these procedural delays may lead to contempt of Court. The Authority was
of the view that to avoid contempt of court it will be appropriate to initiate process of
considering applications of M/s Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. for ex-post facto environmental
clearance in compliance to the directions contained in Hon’ble Delhi High Court orders
passed on 26.05.20014 and 22.09.2014. The status of the three applications submitted by
M/s Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. for seeking prior environmental clearance was discussed.
1.
Environment Clearance for Industrial Shed and Multi level car parking
project at sector- 18 Palm Gurgaon Road, Gurgaon :The project proponent on 19.02.2013 submitted the application under EIA
Notification for prior environmental clearance for construction of Multi level car parking.
The SEAC in its 88th meeting held on 06.08.2013 recommended to file this case on the
grounds that the project proponent has failed to submit vital information required for
appraisal of the project. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration by
SEIAA in its 59th meeting held on 17/18.10.2013 and the case was filed as per the
recommendation of SEAC. The case was filed prior to filling of petition in the Hon’ble
court. It was also observed that the authorized representative of project proponent Sh.
Deepak Jain GM (Environment) has submitted duly notarized undertaking on 05.08.2014
27
and has admitted the mistake for starting the construction of the project without obtaining
prior environmental clearance and also has given assurance not to repeat violation of
EPA 1986 in future.
Decision taken by SEIAA:
The project proponent is now required to submit fresh application for ex-post facto
environmental clearance as per the procedure laid down in the Notification and in
compliance to the Hon’ble High Court orders.
2.
Environment Clearance for expansion of Industrial Building for testing of
vehicles (R & D Centre) at Plot No. 1, Sector-33 B-33C IMT, Rohtak.
The project proponent on 19.02.2013 submitted the application under EIA
Notification for prior environmental clearance for expansion of Industrial Building for
testing of vehicles. The SEAC in its 87th meeting held on 22.07.2013 has recommended
the project for environmental clearance. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for
consideration in the 59th meeting, 62nd meeting and 67th meeting of SEIAA held on
18.10.2013, 18.12.2013 & 28.02.2014. It was observed by the SEIAA that the project
proponent has commenced the construction of project without obtaining prior
environmental clearance thus violated the provisions of Environment (Protection) Act,
1986. The case was examined in the light of guidelines/procedure given in the MoEF GoI
OM Dated 12.12.2012. As per the guidelines the PS, Environment vide letter dated
12.03.2014 was requested to initiate legal action against the project proponent under
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and send the credible action taken report.
Simultaneously the project proponent was also advised to submit Board of Directors
Resolution, resolving that they admit its mistake for carrying out construction of the
project without obtaining prior environment clearance and such violation shall not be
repeated in future. The project proponent challenged the decision of SEIAA in the
Hon’ble Delhi High Court and the Hon’ble court disposed off the petition on 26.05.2014
and passed orders for compliance. It was also observed that the authorized representative
of project proponent Sh. Deepak Jain GM (Environment) has submitted duly notarized
undertaking on 05.08.2014 and has admitted the mistake for starting the construction of
the project without obtaining prior environmental clearance and also has given assurance
not to repeat violation of EPA 1986 in future.
Decision taken by SEIAA:
As the SEAC has recommended this case for environmental clearance and no
violation was reported in the recommendations whereas the project proponent has
admitted the mistake for starting construction of the project without obtaining prior
environmental clearance. The case may be referred back to SEAC with the advice to
appraise this project for according ex-post facto environmental clearance as per the
procedure prescribed in the Notification in compliance to the Hon’ble High Court orders
28
and direct the project proponent to submit revised project details i.e. Form-I, Form-IA
required for ex-post facto appraisal of the project.
3.
Environment Clearance for Industrial Building and Construction Project at
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. Manesar.
The project proponent on 19.02.2013 submitted the application under EIA
Notification for prior environmental clearance for Industrial Building and construction
Project. This case is pending with SEAC and the project proponent is not providing the
vital information to the SEAC required for appraisal of the project. The SEAC on
17.07.2014 has given final notice to the project proponent for submission of vital
information. It was also observed that the authorized representative of project proponent
Sh. Deepak Jain GM (Environment) has submitted duly notarized undertaking on
05.08.2014 and has admitted the mistake for starting the construction of the project
without obtaining prior environmental clearance and also has given assurance not to
repeat violation of EPA 1986 in future.
Decision taken by SEIAA:
The Secretary SEAC may be advised to appraise this project for according ex-post
facto environmental clearance as per the procedure laid down in the Notification and in
compliance to the Hon’ble High Court order.
It was also decided that if filling of SLP in the Supreme Court is allowed or
advised by AG, Haryana then the final judgment/orders passed in the SLP by the
Hon’ble Court shall be applicable in all the three cases of M/s Maruti Suzuki India Ltd
discussed above.
Extension of Validity of Environment Clearance cases:
Item No. [1] EC for Regarding Extension of validity period by 5 years of
Environmental Clearance Letter issued for the project “Uniworld
Resorts”-Residential plotted colony with other infrastructure
Amenities at Sector-33 & 48, district-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
Unitech Residential Resorts Ltd.
It was noticed that the environmental clearance to this project was accorded by
MOEF GOI vide letter dated 03.12.2007. The validity of EC letter was up to 02.12.2012.
The project proponent vide letter dated 28.11.2012 submitted the application for
extension of validity of environmental clearance letter. The project proponent vide letter
10.07.2013 has informed that the civil construction work of the project has been
completed within the validity of environmental clearance letter and requested for
withdrawal of the case. The SEIAA in its 59th meeting held on 18.10.2013 decided to call
for the records from the MOEF GOI to check whether the development work carried out
by the project proponent is in accordance with the approved plans or not?
In the today’s meeting it was informed that the MOEF GOI has not supplied the
records despite issuance of reminder on 01.10.2014. It was also noticed that the project
29
proponent vide letter 13.11.2014 has informed about his inability to attend the meeting
and reiterated its claim that the civil construction work has been completed as per
approved plans and within the validity of EC letter and requested for de-listing of the
case.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to inspect the site to assess the status of construction in the light of above
observation and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [2] Extension of Validity of Environment Clearance for proposed Group
Housing Project “Tulip Ace & Petals” Sector-89, Gurgaon by
M/s Tulip Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
It was noticed that the environmental clearance to this project was accorded by
MOEF GOI vide letter dated 11.07.2008. The validity of EC letter was up to 10.07.2013.
project proponent vide letter dated 09.07.2013 submitted the application for extension of
validity of environmental clearance letter. The SEIAA in its 72nd meeting held on
26.06.2014 decided to call for the records from the MOEF GOI.
In the today’s meeting it was informed that the MOEF GOI has not supplied the
records despite issuance of reminder on 01.10.2014. It was clear from Form-I, Form-IA
and project details submitted by the project proponent that the project proponent has not
started the construction of the project. The project proponent has also failed to submit the
certified copy of compliance report and site photographs showing status of construction if
any.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to inspect the site to assess the status of construction in the light of above
observation and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [3] Extension of EC for proposed project “Construction of 5 star resort
project” Village: Sarai on Tauru Road, Delhi-Jaipur Hightwy,
PO: Hasanpur, Tauru, Dist.-Mewat, Haryana by M/s Landbase India
Limited.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the
environmental clearance to this project was accorded by MOEF GOI vide letter dated
08.04.2008. The validity of EC letter was up to 07.04.2013. The project proponent vide
letter dated 01.10.2013 submitted the application for extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter. The case was lastly considered in the 72nd meeting of
SEIAA held on 26.06.2014 in the presence of representative or the project proponent.
The representative of the project proponent informed that the Environmental Clearance to
their project was granted by MOEF, GOI on 08.04.2008 and the construction of project
was started after receipt of consent to establish from HSPCB on 07.10.2011 and this is
30
only the reason for delay in execution of project. The representative of the project
proponent informed that they have already completed the civil construction of building
before the expiry of EC and only small amount of work has been left with for which they
require extension of validity of EC. The representative of the project proponent was
advised to submit the compliance report of conditions imposed in the environment
clearance letter, detail of construction already undertaken and an undertaking with the
declaration that no construction has been undertaken after the expiry of EC granted by
MOEF GOI. Accordingly it was decided to defer this case with the decision that:
1. The MOEF GOI may be requested to supply the records of M/s Landbase India
Ltd pertaining to grant of Environment Clearance for construction of 5 star resort
project” Village: Sarai on Tauru Road, Delhi-Jaipur Hightwy, PO: Hasanpur,
Tauru, Dist.-Mewat, Haryana.
2. The project proponent may be advised to furnish the following information within
15 days:
i.
Compliance report of conditions imposed in the environment clearance
letter.
ii.
Detail of construction already undertaken.
iii.
An undertaking with the declaration that no construction has been
undertaken after the expiry of EC granted by MOEF GOI.
In the today’s meeting it was informed that the project proponent has submitted
the reply as was desired by SEIAA vide letter dated 11.07.2014 but MOEF GOI has not
supplied the records despite issuance of reminder on 01.10.2014.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to grant extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter subject to the submission of an under taking with the
declaration that the construction has been completed as per approved plans.
Item No. [4] Extension of time for Environmental Clearance for the Group Hosing
Colony at Village Azizulapur, Sector-19, Panipat by M/s
Splendor Landbase Ltd.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the
environmental clearance to this project was accorded by SEIAA vide letter dated
01.04.2009. The validity of EC letter was up to 31.03.2014. The project proponent vide
letter dated 20.03.2014 submitted the application for extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter. The project proponent informed that 15% of construction
has been achieved (up to 1st level floor of Tower). The project proponent also submitted
copy of valid license and certified copy of compliance report issued by RO, MOEF GOI,
Chandigarh. The project proponent on 17.11.2014 also submitted an undertaking that the
construction has been raised in accordance with the approved plans and also submitted
site photographs showing status of construction.
31
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to grant extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter for further five years.
Item No. [5] Re-validation of Environmental Clearance for the project “Paliwal
City” Township at Sector-38 & 39, Panipat, Haryana by M/s
Parsvnath Developers Ltd.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the
environmental clearance to this project was accorded by SEIAA vide letter dated
04.05.2009. The validity of EC letter was up to 03.05.2014. The project proponent vide
letter dated 28.03.2014 submitted the application for extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter. The project proponent informed that 60% of civil
construction has been achieved. The project proponent failed to submit certified copy of
compliance report, copy of valid license updated Form-I, Form-IA and photographs
showing status of construction and reasons for delay in starting construction.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to inspect the site to assess the status of construction in the light of above
observation and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [6] Re-validation of Environmental Clearance for the project “Parsvnath
Mall” Commercial Complex at Sector-8, Near Tau Devi Lal
Park, Soniapt, Haryana by M/s Parsvnath Developers Ltd.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the
environmental clearance to this project was accorded by SEIAA vide letter dated
16.04.2009. The validity of EC letter was up to 15.04.2014. The project proponent vide
letter dated 07.04.2014 submitted the application for extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter. The project proponent informed that basement work has
been completed. The project proponent failed to submit certified copy of compliance
report, copy of valid license updated Form-I, Form-IA and photographs showing status of
construction and reasons for delay in starting construction.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to inspect the site to assess the status of construction in the light of above
observation and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [7] Environment Clearance renewal for proposed IT Park project at
Village-Tikri, Sector-48, Gurgaon by M/s Parsvnath Developers
Ltd.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the
environmental clearance to this project was accorded by SEIAA vide letter dated
16.04.2009. The validity of EC letter was up to 15.04.2014. The project proponent vide
letter dated 17.04.2014 submitted the application for extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter. The project proponent informed that only excavation
32
work has been done and no civil construction has been raised. The project proponent
failed to submit certified copy of compliance report, copy of valid license updated FormI, Form-IA and photographs showing status of construction.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided that the project proponent may
be asked to seek fresh environmental clearance for their project before starting the
construction work at the project as the EC granted is no more valid beyond 15.04.2014.
Item No. [8] Extension of Environmental Clearance for Commercial Complex
measuring 4.843 Acres at Sector-6 6, District Gurgaon by M/s Gentle
Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the
environmental clearance to this project was accorded by SEIAA vide letter dated
01.05.2009. The validity of EC letter was up to 30.04.2014. The project proponent vide
letter dated 23.04.2014 submitted the application for extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter. The project proponent informed that the construction of
basement has been started. The project proponent submitted certified copy of valid
license, certified copy of compliance report, updated Form-I, Form-IA and photographs
showing status of construction. The representative of the project proponent was asked to
give justified reasons for delay in starting construction.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to inspect the site to assess the status of construction in the light of above
observation and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [9] Extension of validity of Environmental Clearance for proposed
construction of Township Project “Parsvnath City, Dharuhera” at
Sector 1, 1 B & 2B, near village Kharkhera, Distt-Rewari, Haryana by
M/s Parsvnath Developers Ltd.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the
environmental clearance to this project was accorded by SEIAA vide letter dated
26.05.2009. The validity of EC letter was up to 25.05.2014. The project proponent vide
letter dated 29.04.2014 submitted the application for extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter. The project proponent informed that 30% construction
has been achieved. The project proponent failed to submit certified copy of compliance
report, copy of valid license updated Form-I, Form-IA and photographs showing status of
construction and also reasons for delay in start of construction.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to inspect the site to assess the status of construction in the light of above
observation and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
33
Item No. [10] Validity Extension Environmental Clearance for proposed
construction of Residential Project “Parsvnath Group Housing” at
Sector-5, Distt. Rewari, Haryana by M/s Parsvnath Developers Ltd.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the
environmental clearance to this project was accorded by MOEF GOI vide letter dated
24.12.2007. The validity of EC letter was up to 23.12.2012. The project proponent vide
letter dated 05.05.2014 submitted the application for extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter. The project proponent informed that no civil construction
has been started at the site. The project proponent failed to submit the application well in
time, certified copy of compliance report, copy of valid license updated Form-I, Form-IA
and photographs of the site.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided that the project proponent may
be asked to seek fresh environmental clearance for their project before starting the
construction work at the project as the EC granted is no more valid beyond 23.12.2012.
Item No. [11] Validity Extension Environmental Clearance for proposed
construction of Comemrcial Mall project “Parsvnath City Centre”
(Formally known as TDI City Mall) at Old Civil Hospital site
Railway road, Sonipat, Haryana by M/s Parsvnath Developers Ltd.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the
environmental clearance to this project was accorded by MOEF GOI vide letter dated
19.03.2008. The validity of EC letter was up to 18.03.2013. The project proponent vide
letter dated 05.05.2014 submitted the application for extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter. The project proponent informed that excavation of
basement has been started. The project proponent failed to submit the application well in
time, certified copy of compliance report, copy of valid license updated Form-I, Form-IA
and photographs of the site.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided that the project proponent may
be asked to seek fresh environmental clearance for their project before starting the
construction work at the project as the EC granted is no more valid beyond 18.03.2013.
Item No. [12] Validity Extension Environmental Clearance for proposed
construction of Group Housing Project “Preston” at Sector 9 & 18,
Sonipat, Haryana by M/s Parsvnath Developers Ltd.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the
environmental clearance to this project was accorded by MOEF GOI vide letter dated
24.12.2007. The validity of EC letter was up to 23.12.2012. The project proponent vide
letter dated 05.05.2014 submitted the application for extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter. The project proponent informed that 10% of construction
has been achieved. The project proponent failed to submit the application well in time,
certified copy of compliance report, copy of valid license updated Form-I, Form-IA and
photographs of the site.
34
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided that the project proponent may
be asked to seek fresh environmental clearance for their project before starting the
construction work at the project as the EC granted is no more valid beyond 23.12.2012.
Item No. [13] Regarding Renewal of Environmental Clearance granted to us for the
“Office, Commercial & Hotel Building” Project located at
Village Pawala Khusrupur, Sector-109, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
Shrimaya Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the
environmental clearance to this project was accorded by SEIAA vide letter dated
08.07.2009. The validity of EC letter was up to 07.07.2014. The project proponent vide
letter dated 07.07.2014 submitted the application for extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter. The certified copy of compliance report shows that the
project proponent has not started the construction work.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided that the project proponent may
be asked to seek fresh environmental clearance for their project before starting the
construction work at the project as the EC granted is no more valid beyond 07.07.2014.
Item No. [14] Application for Renewal of Environmental Clearance granted of
Group Housing Project measuring 61.642 Acres at Village Maidawas
and Badshahpur, Sector-65, Gurgoan, Haryana by M/s Manglam
Multiplex Ltd.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the
environmental clearance to this project was accorded by SEIAA vide letter dated
28.10.2009. The validity of EC letter was up to 27.10.2014. The project proponent vide
letter dated 01.08.2014 submitted the application for extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter. The project proponent informed that 50% construction
has been achieved.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to inspect the site to assess the status of construction in the light of above
observation and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [15] Extension of Environmental Clearance for proposed Group Housing
Project Express Greens II at Sector M1A, (19.643 acres),
Village Manesar, Gurgaon, Haryana being Developed by M/s DLF
Homes Developers Ltd.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the
environmental clearance to this project was accorded by SEIAA vide letter dated
28.10.2009. The validity of EC letter was up to 27.10.2014. The project proponent vide
letter dated 03.09.2014 submitted the application for extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter. The project proponent informed that 120581.52 sqm area
has been construction out of proposed built up area of 180233 sqm but the project
proponent failed to submit the certified copy of compliance report.
35
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to defer the case with the
decision that the project proponent shall submit the certified copy of compliance report.
Item No. [16] Application for Renewal of Environmental Clearance of Commercial
Colony Project measuring 7.468 Acres at Village Begampur
Khatola, Sector-74, Gurgaon, Haryana being developed by M/s
Prompt Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the
environmental clearance to this project was accorded by SEIAA vide letter dated
04.12.2009. The validity of EC letter was up to 03.12.2014. The project proponent vide
letter dated 16.10.2014 submitted the application for extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter. The certified copy of compliance report shows that the
project proponent has not started the construction work.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided that the project proponent may
be asked to seek fresh environmental clearance for their project before starting the
construction work at the project as the EC granted is no more valid beyond 03.12.2014.
Item No. [17] Application for Renewal of Environmental Clearance of Commercial
Colony Project measuring 2.754 Acres at Village Begampur
Khatola, Sector-73, Gurgaon, Haryana being developed by M/s
Lavish Buildmart Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the
environmental clearance to this project was accorded by SEIAA vide letter dated
04.12.2009. The validity of EC letter was up to 03.12.2014. The project proponent vide
letter dated 16.10.2014 submitted the application for extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter. The certified copy of compliance report shows that the
project proponent has not started the construction work.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided that the project proponent may
be asked to seek fresh environmental clearance for their project before starting the
construction work at the project as the EC granted is no more valid beyond 03.12.2014.
Item No. [18] Application for Extension of Environmental Cleanrance for Group
Housing Project “NCR One” on an area measuring 10.712
Acres at Sector-95, Village Wazirpur, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
Sidhartha Buildhome Pvt. Ltd (formally known as Pashupati
Buildhome Pvt. Ltd.)
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the
environmental clearance to this project was accorded by SEIAA vide letter dated
28.10.2009. The validity of EC letter was up to 27.10.2014. The project proponent vide
letter dated 21.10.2014 submitted the application for extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter. The project proponent informed that they have
36
constructed 80500 sqm of area out of total 83456.97 sqm but failed to submit the certified
copy of compliance report.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to inspect the site to assess the status of construction in the light of above
observation and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [19] Extension & Revision in EC for Residential Colony “TDI City”
located at Sec-58, 59, 60, 61, 63 & 64 Sonepat-Kundli, Haryana by
M/s TDI Infrastructure Ltd.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the SEAC
has forwarded this case for considering extension of validity of environmental clearance
whereas the environmental clearance letter and certified copy of compliance report is not
enclosed with the documents. The project proponent on 29.08.2014 submitted application
for extension and revision of environmental clearance for Residential Colony “TDI City”
located at Sec-58, 59, 60, 61, 63 & 64 Sonepat-Kundli. The representative of the
consultant present in the meeting was directed to submit separate application for
extension of validity of environmental clearance and revision of already granted
environment clearance. The representative of the consultant submitted the separate
application as was directed by the SEIAA.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided that:
1. The application for revision of environmental clearance submitted by project
proponent
may be
forwarded
to
Secretary SEAC
for
appraisal
and
recommendation along with file.
2. The application for extension of validity of environment clearance be taken up in
the next meeting.
************