Chapter 13 Organization Structure and Design PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. Learning Objectives After reading and studying this chapter and doing the exercises, you should be able to: 1. Identify and define the foundation concepts of organization structure, including the informal organization. 2. Specify the basic features of the bureaucratic form of organization structure, including how it is divided into departments. 3. Describe three key modifications of a bureaucratic structure: matrix, flat, and outsourcing. 4. Describe the two contemporary organizational designs referred to as horizontal structures and network structures. 5. Specify the criteria for an effective organization design. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–2 Learning Objectives (cont’d) After reading and studying this chapter and doing the exercises, you should be able to: 6. Understand why a new type of organization chart called an organigraph can contribute to understanding organization structure. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–3 Organizations • Organization Is a collection of people working together to achieve a common purpose (or simply a big group). • Organization structure Is the arrangement of people and tasks to accomplish organizational goals. • Organizational design Is the process of creating a structure that best fits a purpose, strategy, and environment. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–4 Types of Organizational Structures • Mechanistic organizations Hierarchical bureaucracies that: Emphasize specialization and control Engage in vertical communications Rely heavily on rules, policies, and procedures. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–5 Types of Organizational Structures • Organic structures Networks designed to respond to rapid changes in the environment by emphasizing: Horizontal specialization and personal coordination Extensive informal communications Loose rules, policies, and procedures Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–6 Organizational Structures (cont’d) • Formal organizational structure Is an official statement of the reporting relationships, rules, and regulations that guide and govern the conduct of business by the organization. • Informal organizational structure Is a set of unofficial working relationships providing the flexibility to take care of events and transactions not covered by the formal structure. Is revealed using social network analysis to trace informal social relationships and communication channels. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–7 Organizational Structures (cont’d) • Formalization Is the degree to which expectations regarding the methods of work are specified, written down, and enforced. Produces an organization with a highly specialized labor and high delegation of authority. Is associated with mechanistic (bureaucratic) organizations. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–8 Organizational Structures (cont’d) • Centralization Is the extent to which executives delegate authority to lower organizational units. Less delegation = more centralization. Strategic decisions are more likely to be centralized than operational decisions. The use of functional units is a feature of centralization. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–9 Organizational Structures (cont’d) • Complexity Refers to the number of different job titles and organizational units in an organization. Complexity increases the difficulty of managing an organization and typically increases with the size of the organization. • Differentiation A horizontally differentiated organization will have many different job titles. A vertically differentiated organization will have many different levels. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–10 Organizational Structures (cont’d) • Coupling Is the extent to which organizational parts are interdependent. Tight coupling between parts is indicated if a minor change in one part produces a large change in an associated part. Has increased due to the increasing interdependence of the parts or subsystems of organizations today. Organizational design is influenced by coupling and the increased necessity for flexibility to meet changing market conditions. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–11 Weber’s Ideal Organization: the Bureaucracy 1. Rules and procedures controlling the organizational structure 2. A high degree of differentiation among organizational functions 3. A high degree of job specialization 4. An organization of offices determined by hierarchy, with each unit reporting to a higher unit 5. A heavy emphasis on rules and norms to regulate behavior 6. Interpersonal relations characterized by impersonality in place of favoritism 7. Selection and promotion based on merit 8. All administrative actions recorded in writing Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–12 Forms of Bureaucratic Organizations • Machine bureaucracy Uses standardized work processes and is efficient. Best use is in large organizations. • Professional bureaucracy Standardizes skills for coordination and is composed of a core of highly trained professionals. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–13 The Bureaucratic Form of Organization EXHIBIT 13-1 Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–14 Bureaucratic Organizations • Contributions Large-scale accomplishments Accountability for results Managers with precious skills and expertise Valuable organizational memory • Potential dysfunctions Suppression of innovation and decision making Lower productivity Inconvenience and inefficiency High worker frustration and low satisfaction Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–15 Departmentalization • The process of subdividing work into specialized departments. Advantageous in enhancing product growth or service to customers. • Types of departmentalization: Functional Territorial Product or service Customer Hybrid Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–16 Departmentalization (cont’d) • Functional departmentalization Grouping people according to their expertise Most common type of organization • Territorial departmentalization Grouping subunits according to the geographic areas that they serve. Internationalization of business has increased the need for organizing subunits territorially. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–17 Functional Departmentalization within the Davenport Machine Company EXHIBIT 13-2 Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–18 Departmentalization (cont’d) • Product/Service departmentalization Is arranging units by the product or service they provide. • Customer departmentalization Creates a structure based on customer needs. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–19 Product/Service Departmentalization at GE Capital EXHIBIT 13-3 Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–20 Other Organizational Structures • Hybrid (or Mixed) organization structure Combines the advantages of different organizational types. Both specialized and self-contained units are included within the organizational structure. • Line versus staff Line groups are responsible for the primary purposes of the firm whereas staff groups are responsible for secondary purposes. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–21 Hybrid Organization Structure EXHIBIT 13-4 Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–22 Matrix Organization • A project structure superimposed on a functional structure to take advantage of new opportunities and solve special problems. Projects are temporary groups of specialists working under one manager to accomplish a fixed objective such as launching a new product. Matrix structure creates a dual reporting challenge—the involved employees may have to report to two bosses. A key advantage is its ability to implement projects quickly. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–23 Matrix Organization in an Electronics Company EXHIBIT 13-5 Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–24 Organizational Structures (cont’d) • Flat organization Has relatively few levels Is less bureaucratic because: There are fewer managers available to review and approve decisions. The short chain-of-command creates less concern about authority differences among people. Are more efficient than tall organizations. Downsizing to a flatter structure has strong effects on surviving employees. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–25 Outsourcing as an Organizational Arrangement • Outsourcing Is having work done by other organizations as a method of dividing the work between groups on the outside with groups on the inside. Reduces the need for employees and physical assets and reduce payroll costs. Can create ethical dilemmas for companies who have no control over the actions of their outsourcing supplier. Can cause conflict with unions over outsourcing. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–26 Leading-Edge Organization Structures • The horizontal structure Is the arrangement of work by teams that are responsible accomplishing a process. Is a structure in which employees take collective responsibility for customers. • Reengineering Is the radical redesign of work to achieve substantial improvements in performance. Searches for the most efficient way to perform a task. Organizes work horizontally rather than vertically. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–27 A Horizontal Structure EXHIBIT 13-6 Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–28 The Network Structure • Network structure (or Virtual organization) Is a temporary association of otherwise independent firms that are linked by technology to share resources and markets. Is horizontally oriented. Requires that its members trust one another. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–29 Nine Criteria for an Effective Organization Design Source: Diagram developed from text information presented in Michael Gould and Andrew Campbell, “Do You Have a Well-Designed Organization?” Harvard Business Review, March 2002, pp. 117–124. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. EXHIBIT 13-7 13–30 Organigraphs: Drawing How Companies Really Work • Organigraphs A map that provides an overview of the company’s functions and the way people organize themselves at work. Help in the understanding of organizational functioning. Assist in expanding into new markets and identifying opportunities. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 13–31