Asian Americans: “Model Minorities”? Chapter Eight Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Introduction • • Asian American and Pacific Islander groups differ from each other in language, customs and culture, physical appearance and, most importantly, in the ways in which they have entered American society. Several features are worth noting: Asians and Pacific Islanders are tiny fractions of the total U.S. population. Most Asian American groups have grown dramatically in recent decades. This rapid growth is projected to continue for decades to come, and the impact of Asian Americans on everyday life and American culture will increase accordingly. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Ten Largest Asian American Groups 2010 Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Foreign-Born by Group 2010 Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Origins and Cultures • • • • • Asian cultures tend to stress group membership over individual selfinterest. Asian cultures stress sensitivity to the opinions and judgments of others and to the importance of avoiding public embarrassment and not giving offense—saving face. Traditional Asian cultures were male dominated, and women were consigned to subordinate roles. The experiences of Asian Americans in the United States modified these patriarchal values and traditional traits. The cultural and religious differences among the Asian American groups also reflect the recent histories of each of the sending nations. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Early Immigration and the Anti-Chinese Campaign • Ethnocentrism based on racial, cultural, and language • • differences was present from the beginning. At first, competition for jobs between Chinese immigrants and native-born workers was muted by an abundance of jobs, but as the West Coast economy changed and eastern Anglo migration continued, the Chinese came to be seen as a threat, and elements of the dominant group tried to limit competition. The Chinese controlled few power resources with which to withstand these attacks as they were a small group, and by law, were not permitted to become citizens. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Early Immigration and the Anti-Chinese Campaign • In 1882, the anti-Chinese campaign experienced its • • ultimate triumph when the U.S. Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Act banning virtually all immigration from China. Consistent with the predictions of split labor market theory, native-born workers, organized labor, and white owners of small businesses felt threatened by the Chinese and supported the Chinese Exclusion Act (Boswell, 1986). Conflicts such as the anti-Chinese campaign can be especially intense because they confound racial and ethnic antagonisms with disputes between different social classes. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. The Second Generation • • • • The second generation tended to look beyond the enclave to fill their needs. They founded their own organizations that were more compatible with their American lifestyles (Lai, 1980, p. 225). WWII brought more opportunities—jobs, military service, GI Bill, socioeconomic mobility. Women of the second generation also pursued education, and as early as 1960, their median years of schooling were slightly higher than for Chinese American men (Kitano & Daniels, 1995, p. 48). Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. An American Success Story? • • • Although well-educated Chinese Americans could find good jobs in the mainstream economy, the highest, most lucrative positions—and those that required direct supervision of whites—were still closed to them. Many Chinese Americans who stayed in the Chinatowns and the immigrants who began arriving after 1965, rely for survival on low-wage jobs in the garment industry, the service sector, and the small businesses of the enclave economy. Thus, Chinese Americans are often said to be “bipolar” in their occupational structure (see Barringer, Takeuchi, & Levin, 1995; Takaki, 1993, pp. 415–416; Wong, 1995, pp. 77–78; Zhou & Logan, 1989). Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. The Anti-Japanese Campaign • • • The contact situation for Japanese immigrants resembled that of the Chinese. Although Japanese immigration was partly curtailed in 1907 when a “gentlemen’s agreement” was signed, a loophole allowed females to continue to immigrate until the 1920s. Japanese Americans were thus able to develop a second generation without much delay that numbered about half of the group by 1930, and were a majority of 63% on the eve of World War II (Kitano & Daniels, 1995, p. 59). Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. The Anti-Japanese Campaign • • • In 1910, between 30% and 40% of all Japanese in California were engaged in agriculture, owned small plots of land and comprising only a minuscule percentage of West Coast farmers (Jibou, 1988, pp. 357–358). Their presence and relative success stimulated discriminatory legislation in the Alien Land Act, which declared aliens who were ineligible for citizenship to be also ineligible to own land (Kitano, 1980, p. 563). Japanese Americans were able to dodge the discriminatory legislation, mostly by putting titles of land in the names of their American-born children, who were citizens by law (Jibou, 1988, p. 359). Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. The Relocation Camps • • • Two months after the attack on Pearl Harbor, President Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066, which led to the relocation of Japanese Americans living on the West Coast. By the late summer of 1942, more than 110,000 Japanese Americans, young and old, male and female—virtually the entire West Coast population—had been transported to relocation camps where they were imprisoned behind barbed-wire fences patrolled by armed guards. Many of these people were American citizens, and no one was given the opportunity to refute the implicit charge of disloyalty. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. The Relocation Camps • • • • The government gave families little notice to prepare for evacuation and secure their homes, businesses, and belongings. Eventually more than 25,000 escaped the camps by volunteering for military service, many with distinction. The camps did reduce the extent to which women were relegated to a subordinate role. Some Japanese Americans brought lawsuits to end the program, and in 1944, the Supreme Court ruled that detention was unconstitutional. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Japanese Americans After World War II • • • In 1948, Congress passed legislation to authorize compensation to Japanese Americans, but these claims were eventually settled for less than one tenth the amount of the actual economic losses. Demand for meaningful redress and compensation continued, and in 1988, Congress passed a bill granting reparations of about $20,000 in cash to each of the 60,000 remaining survivors of the camps. The law also acknowledged that the relocation program had been a grave injustice to Japanese Americans (Biskupic, 1989, p. 2879). Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Japanese Americans After World War II • • • For the Nisei, when the war ended they were unwilling to rebuild the Japanese community as it had been before. When anti-Asian prejudice declined in the 1950s and the job market began to open, the Nisei were educationally prepared to take advantage of resultant opportunities (Kitano, 1980, p. 567). By 1960, Japanese Americans had an occupational profile very similar to that of whites except that they were actually overrepresented among professionals, and there was a tendency to choose “safe” careers that did not require extensive contact with the public or supervision of whites (Kitano & Daniels, 1988, p. 70). Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Japanese Americans After World War II • • • An additional factor contributing to the perception of “model minority” status for Japanese Americans is the small number of immigrants from Japan that the community has not had to devote resources to. Furthermore, recent immigrants from Japan tend to be highly educated professional people whose socioeconomic characteristics add to the perception of success and affluence. In any case, the Sansei and Yonsei are highly integrated into the occupational structure of the larger society. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Comparing Minority Groups • • • Unlike the situation of African Americans in the 1600s and Mexican Americans in the 1800s, the dominant group had no desire to control the labor of these groups. Unlike Native Americans, Chinese Americans and Japanese Americans in the early 20th century presented no military danger to the larger society so there was little concern with their activities once the economic threat had been eliminated. Chinese Americans and Japanese Americans had the ingredients and experiences necessary to form enclaves. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Contemporary Immigration from Asia • • Immigration from Asia has been considerable since the 1960s, averaging close to 300,000 per year and running about 30% to 35% of all immigrants. As was the case with Hispanic immigrants, the sending nations are considerably less developed than the United States, and the primary motivation for most of these immigrants is economic. However, unlike Hispanic immigration, the Asian immigrant stream also includes a large contingent of highly educated professionals seeking opportunities to practice their careers and expand their skills. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Contemporary Immigration from Asia • Other factors besides mere economics attract these immigrants. Many Asian immigrants are the spouses of American military personnel. There are also a number of immigrants from India, many of who are highly educated and skilled. o Immigrants from India are at the “immigrant” end of Blauner’s continuum. Refugees from Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos, many of whom lived in camps and relocation centers for years before immigrating to the United States. o Because of the conditions of their escape from their homelands, they typically bring little in the way of human or material capital with them. o For example, Vietnamese Americans have a socioeconomic profile that in some ways resembles those of non-Asian racial minorities in the United States. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Prejudice and Discrimination • • • American prejudice against Asians first became prominent during the anti-Chinese movement of the 19th century. The Chinese were seen as a threat to the working class, to American democracy, and to other American institutions. Many of these stereotypes and fears transferred to the Japanese later in the 19th century and then to other Asian groups as they arrived in the United States. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Prejudice and Discrimination • • • Although prejudice against Asian and Pacific Island groups may have weakened overall, the continuing force of anti-Asian prejudice is marked most dramatically by hate crimes against members of the group. Asian Americans have also been the victims of “positive” stereotypes—“model minority.” This label has been applied to these groups by others who have a variety of hidden moral and political agendas. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Distribution of Asian Americans 2010 Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Gender and Physical Acculturation: The Anglo Ideal • • A number of studies document the feelings of inadequacy and negative self images that result when minority group members – especially women – compare themselves with the Anglo standards of attractiveness and beauty that dominate U.S. culture. Asian American women, like all women in this still paternalistic society, are pressured by the cultural message that physical beauty should be among their most important concerns. As racial minorities, they are also subjected to the additional message that they are inadequate by Anglo standards and that some of their most characteristic physical traits are devalued – indeed ridiculed – in the larger society. For Asian American women, the attempt to comply with Anglo standards of beauty may include cosmetic surgery on their noses or to “open” their eyes. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Assimilation and Pluralism: Education • • • The pattern of schooling for Asian Americans is very different from other U.S. racial minority groups. As a whole, Asian Americans compare favorably with societywide standards for educational achievement, and they are above those standards on many measures. Even though they exceed national standards for college education, women generally do not fare as well as men. Compare to whites, Chinese Americans are greatly overrepresented at both the highest and lowest levels of schooling. The less well educated members of the group are often illegal immigrants working in the enclave in poorly paid positions. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Median Household Income 2010 Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Distribution of Household Incomes Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Families and Children in Poverty 2010 Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Assimilation and Pluralism: Jobs and Income • • • • The occupational profiles of Asian American groups tend to sustain the image of success. Both males and females are overrepresented in the highest occupational category, a reflection of the high levels of educational attainment for the group. Consistent with the educational qualifications and occupational profiles, Asian Americans as a whole and Chinese and Japanese Americans in particular are above the national median yearly income. Their pattern of income distribution is “bipolar.” That is, they are over-represented in both the highest and lowest income groups. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Assimilation and Pluralism: Primary Structural Assimilation • • Studies of integration at the primary level for Asian Americans generally find high rates of interracial friendship and intermarriage. Studies have also found that native-born Asian Americans were much more likely to marry outside their group than the foreign born. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Focus on Contemporary Issues: How successful are Asian Americans? At what cost? • The view of Asian Americans as “model minorities” is exaggerated and stereotypical. First, the group is concentrated in cities where the cost of living is very high. Second, per capita income for Asian Americans is lower than the national average. Third, researchers commonly find that Asian Americans get lower income returns for their years of schooling and earn less than whites of the same educational level. Also, Asian Americans face a glass ceiling that limits their access. Finally, while it might seem that the “model minority” stereotype is benign and positive, it can have serious negative consequences. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Comparing Minority Groups: Explaining Asian American Success • Chinese and Japanese immigrants arrived in America at about the same time as immigrants from southern and eastern Europe, yet the barriers to upward mobility for European immigrants (or, at least for their descendants) fell away more rapidly than the barriers for immigrants from Asia. Whereas the cultural and linguistic markers that identified eastern and southern Europeans faded with each passing generation, the racial characteristics of the Asian groups continued to separate them from the larger society. Immigrants from southern and eastern Europe entered the industrializing East Coast economy, where they took industrial and manufacturing jobs that gave them and their descendants the potential for upward mobility in the mainstream economy. On the other hand, Asian Americans exclusion from the mainstream economy was reinforced by overt, racially-based discrimination from both employers and labor unions. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Comparing Minority Groups: Explaining Asian American Success • • • • Some Asian groups rank far above other racial minority groups on all the commonly used measures of secondary structural integration and equality. However, if we also observe the full range of differences within each group (e.g., the “bipolar” nature of occupations among Chinese Americans), we see that the images of success have been exaggerated and need to be placed in a proper context. The relative success of Chinese American and Japanese Americans has become a device for scolding other minority groups. The social class differences between these groups today flow from their respective situations in the past. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Comparing Minority Groups: Explaining Asian American Success • • Many of the occupational and financial advances made by Chinese Americans and Japanese Americans have been due to the high levels of education achieved by the second generations. At the time that native-born Chinese Americans and Japanese Americans reached educational parity with whites, the vast majority of African Americans, Native Americans, and Mexican Americans were still victimized by Jim Crow laws and legalized segregation and excluded from opportunities for anything but rudimentary education. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Comparing Minority Groups: Explaining Asian American Success • • • The structural explanation is not consistent with traditional views of the assimilation process. The immigrant generation of Chinese Americans and Japanese Americans responded to the massive discrimination they faced by withdrawing, developing ethnic enclaves, and becoming “invisible” to the larger society. Like Cuban Americans, Chinese Americans and Japanese Americans used their traditional cultures and patterns of social life to create and build their own subcommunities from which they launched the next generation. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc. Comparative Focus: Japan’s “Invisible” Minority • • • The Burakumin, about 2-3% of the Japanese population, has experienced discrimination and prejudice for hundreds of years but is virtually indistinguishable from the general population. The Burakumin were created centuries ago during a caste system that forced them into undesirable occupations. They continue to be seen as “filthy,” “not very bright,” and “untrustworthy”—stereotypical traits that are often associated with minority groups mired in subordinate and unequal positions. Healey. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender 4e © 2014 SAGE Publications, Inc.