7 Production and Cost in the Firm How do economists calculate profit? What is a production function? What is marginal product? How are they related? What are the various costs, and how are they related to each other and to output? How are costs different in the short run vs. the long run? What are “economies of scale”? Total Revenue, Total Cost, Profit We assume that the firm’s goal is to maximize profit. Profit = Total revenue – Total cost the amount a firm receives from the sale of its output the market value of the inputs a firm uses in production Costs: Explicit vs. Implicit Explicit costs – actual cash payments for resources, such as paying wages to workers Implicit costs – opportunity cost of using owner-supplied resources, such as the opportunity cost of the owner’s time Remember: The cost of something is the value of the next best alternative. This is true whether the costs are implicit or explicit. Both matter for a firm’s decisions. Explicit vs. Implicit Costs: An Example Suppose you need $100,000 to start your business. The interest rate is 5%. Case 1: borrow $100,000 • explicit cost = Case 2: use $40,000 of your savings, borrow the other $60,000 • explicit cost = • implicit cost = Economic Profit vs. Accounting Profit Accounting profit = total revenue minus total explicit costs Economic profit = total revenue minus total costs (including BOTH explicit and implicit costs) Accounting profit ignores implicit costs, so it will be greater than economic profit. 2: Economic profit vs. accounting profit ACTIVE LEARNING The equilibrium rent on office space has just increased by $500 per month. Compare the effects on your firm’s accounting profit and economic profit if a. you rent your office space b. you own your office space 5 Production in the Short Run Some resources are considered to be variable and some are considered to be fixed. • It depends on how quickly the level can be altered to change the rate of output. In the short run, at least one resource is fixed. In the long run, all resources are variable. The Production Function A production function shows the relationship between the quantity of inputs used to produce a good, and the quantity of output of that good. It can be represented by a table, equation, or graph. Example 1: • Farmer Jack grows wheat. • He has 5 acres of land. • He can hire as many workers as he wants. EXAMPLE 1: Farmer Jack’s Production Function Q (# of (bushels workers) of wheat) 3,000 Quantity of output L 2,500 0 0 1 1,000 2 1,800 3 2,400 500 4 2,800 0 5 3,000 2,000 1,500 1,000 0 1 2 3 # of workers 4 5 Marginal Product The marginal product of any input is the increase in output arising from an additional unit of that input, holding all other inputs constant. If Farmer Jack hires one more worker, his output rises by the marginal product of labor. Marginal product of labor (MPL) = ∆Q ∆L EXAMPLE 1: Total & Marginal Product L Q (# of (bushels workers) of wheat) ∆L = 1 ∆L = 1 ∆L = 1 ∆L = 1 ∆L = 1 0 0 1 1,000 2 1,800 3 2,400 4 2,800 5 3,000 MPL ∆Q = 1,000 ∆Q = 800 ∆Q = 600 ∆Q = 400 ∆Q = 200 EXAMPLE 1: MPL = Slope of Prod. Function Q (# of (bushels MPL workers) of wheat) 0 0 1,000 1 1,000 800 2 1,800 600 3 4 5 2,400 2,800 3,000 400 200 MPL 3,000 Quantity of output L equals the slope of the 2,500 production function. 2,000 Notice that MPL diminishes 1,500 as L increases. 1,000 This explains why 500 production the function gets flatter 0 as L0 increases. 1 2 3 4 No. of workers 5 Why MPL Is Important Recall from Chapter 1: Rational people choose actions for which the expected marginal benefit exceeds the expected marginal cost. When Farmer Jack hires an extra worker, • his costs rise by the wage he pays the worker • his output rises by MPL Comparing the wage and the change in his output helps Jack decide whether he would benefit from hiring the worker. EXAMPLE 2: A “Fold-It” Factory We are going to create a factory that produces a product known as a “fold-it” Resources: • factory • paper • stapler • staples • labor Why MPL Diminishes The Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns: the marginal product of a variable resource eventually falls as the quantity of the resource used increases (other things equal) If we increases the # of workers but not the # of staplers or the desk area, each add’l worker has less to work with and will be less productive. In general, MPL diminishes as L rises whether the fixed resource is land (as would be the case with Jack the wheat farmer) or capital (our desk and stapler). EXAMPLE 1: Farmer Jack’s Costs Farmer Jack must pay $1,000 per month for the land, regardless of how much wheat he grows. The market wage for a farm worker is $2,000 per month. So Farmer Jack’s costs are related to how much wheat he produces…. EXAMPLE 1: Farmer Jack’s Costs L Q Cost of (# of (bushels land workers) of wheat) 0 0 1 1,000 2 1,800 3 2,400 4 2,800 5 3,000 Cost of labor Total Cost EXAMPLE 1: Farmer Jack’s Total Cost Curve $12,000 Total Cost 0 $1,000 1,000 $3,000 1,800 $5,000 2,400 $7,000 2,800 $9,000 3,000 $11,000 $10,000 Total cost Q (bushels of wheat) $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $0 0 1000 2000 3000 Quantity of wheat Marginal Cost Marginal Cost (MC) is the increase in Total Cost from producing one more unit: ∆TC MC = ∆Q EXAMPLE 1: Total and Marginal Cost Q (bushels of wheat) 0 Total Cost $1,000 ∆Q = 1000 1,000 $3,000 ∆Q = 800 ∆Q = 600 ∆Q = 400 ∆Q = 200 1,800 Marginal Cost (MC) $5,000 2,400 $7,000 2,800 $9,000 3,000 $11,000 ∆TC = $2000 $2.00 ∆TC = $2000 $2.50 ∆TC = $2000 $3.33 ∆TC = $2000 $5.00 ∆TC = $2000 $10.00 EXAMPLE 1: The Marginal Cost Curve 0 TC MC $1,000 $2.00 1,000 $3,000 $2.50 1,800 $5,000 $3.33 2,400 $7,000 $10 Marginal Cost ($) Q (bushels of wheat) $12 $8 MC usually rises as Q rises, as in this example. $6 $4 $2 $5.00 2,800 $9,000 3,000 $11,000 $10.00 $0 0 1,000 2,000 Q 3,000 Why MC Is Important Farmer Jack is rational and wants to maximize his profit. To increase profit, should he produce more wheat or less? To find the answer, Farmer Jack needs to “think at the margin.” If the cost of an additional bushel of wheat (MC) is less than the revenue he would get from selling it, Jack’s profits rise if he produces more. (In the next chapter, we will learn more about how firms choose Q to maximize their profits.) EXAMPLE 3 Our third example is more general, and applies to any type of firm producing any good with any types of resources. EXAMPLE 3: Costs FC VC 0 $100 $0 1 100 70 2 100 120 3 100 160 4 100 210 5 100 280 TC FC $700 VC TC $600 $500 Costs Q $800 $400 $300 $200 $100 6 7 100 380 100 520 $0 0 1 2 3 4 Q 5 6 7 EXAMPLE 3: Marginal Cost TC MC 0 $100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 170 220 260 310 380 480 620 $70 50 40 50 70 100 140 $200 Marginal Cost (MC) Recall, is $175 the change in total cost from producing one more unit: $150 ∆TC MC = ∆Q $100 Usually, MC rises as Q rises, due $75 to diminishing marginal product. Costs Q $125 $50 Sometimes (as here), MC falls $25 before rising. $0 (In other0 examples, 1 2 3 MC 4 may 5 6be 7 constant.) Q EXAMPLE 3: Average Fixed Cost FC 0 $100 1 2 100 100 3 100 4 100 5 100 6 100 7 100 AFC ---- $200 Average fixed cost (AFC) is$175 fixed cost divided by the quantity of output: $150 Costs Q AFC $125 = FC/Q $100 Notice $75 that AFC falls as Q rises: The firm is spreading its fixed $50 costs over a larger and larger $25 number of units. $0 0 1 2 3 4 Q 5 6 7 EXAMPLE 3: Average Variable Cost VC 0 $0 1 70 2 120 3 160 4 210 5 280 6 380 7 520 AVC ---- $200 Average variable cost (AVC) is$175 variable cost divided by the quantity of output: $150 Costs Q AVC $125 = VC/Q $100 As$75 Q rises, AVC may fall initially. In most cases, AVC will $50 eventually rise as output rises. $25 $0 0 1 2 3 4 Q 5 6 7 EXAMPLE 3: Average Total Cost Q TC 0 $100 ATC AFC AVC ---- ---- 1 170 $100 $70 2 220 50 60 3 260 33.33 53.33 4 310 25 52.50 5 380 20 56.00 6 480 16.67 63.33 7 620 14.29 74.29 Average total cost (ATC) equals total cost divided by the quantity of output: ATC = TC/Q Also, ATC = AFC + AVC EXAMPLE 3: Average Total Cost TC 0 $100 1 2 170 220 ATC $200 Usually, as in this example, $175 the ATC curve is U-shaped. ---- $150 $170 110 Costs Q $125 $100 3 260 86.67 4 310 77.50 5 380 76 $25 6 480 80 $0 7 620 88.57 $75 $50 0 1 2 3 4 Q 5 6 7 EXAMPLE 3: The Cost Curves Together $200 $175 ATC AVC AFC MC Costs $150 $125 $100 $75 $50 $25 $0 0 1 2 3 4 Q 5 6 7 ACTIVE LEARNING Costs 3: Fill in the blank spaces of this table. Q VC 0 1 10 2 30 TC AFC AVC ATC $50 ---- ---- ---- $10 $60.00 80 3 16.67 4 100 5 150 6 210 150 20 12.50 36.67 8.33 $10 30 37.50 30 260 MC 35 43.33 60 30 EXAMPLE 3: Why ATC Is Usually U-shaped As Q rises: $200 Initially, falling AFC pulls ATC down. $175 Costs Eventually, rising AVC pulls ATC up. $150 $125 $100 $75 $50 $25 $0 0 1 2 3 4 Q 5 6 7 EXAMPLE 3: ATC and MC When MC < ATC, ATC is falling. $175 $150 ATC is rising. $125 Costs When MC > ATC, The MC curve crosses the ATC curve at the ATC curve’s minimum. ATC MC $200 $100 $75 $50 $25 $0 0 1 2 3 4 Q 5 6 7 Costs in the Long Run Short run: Some inputs are fixed Long run: All inputs are variable (firms can build new factories, or remodel or sell existing ones) In the long run, ATC at any Q is cost per unit using the most efficient mix of inputs for that Q (the factory size with the lowest ATC). EXAMPLE 4: LRAC with 3 Factory Sizes Firm can choose from 3 factory sizes: S, M, L. Each size has its own SRATC curve. The firm can change to a different factory size in the long run, but not in the short run. Cost ($) ATCS ATCM ATCL Q EXAMPLE 4: LRAC with 3 Factory Sizes Cost ($) ATCS ATCM ATCL LRATC QA QB Q A Typical LRAC Curve In the real world, factories come in many sizes, each with its own SRATC curve. Cost LRAC So a typical LRAC curve looks like this: Q How LRAC Changes as the Scale of Production Changes Economies of scale: LRAC falls as Q increases. Cost LRAC Constant returns to scale: LRAC stays the same as Q increases. Diseconomies of scale: LRAC rises as Q increases. Q