“CAD-centric” Integrated Multi-physics Simulation Predictive Capability for Plasma Chamber Nuclear Components Aligned with ReNew Thrust 15 Unlike FSP, the integrated modeling is progressed in a smaller scale fashion A. Ying (UCLA), R. Reed (graduate student), R. Munipalli (HyPerCom) Acknowledgements to graduate(d) students M. Narula, R. Hunt, and H. Zhang (UCLA) Others working on separate parts of the subject M. Abdou, M. Ulrickson (and team), M. Sawan (and team), M. Youssef, B. Merrill FNST meeting August 2, 2010 UCLA 1 Integrated Simulation Predictive Capability (ISPC) as a part of ReNeW Thrust 15: Creating integrated models for attractive fusion power systems Today’s Trend in Simulation: – Treat complexity of entire problem • Extreme geometric complexity • Multi-physics, Multi-scales – Inter-disciplinary approach • Modernize codes & Interpret phenomena from interrelated scientific disciplines – High accuracy & thorough understanding at each level – Interactive visualization and post processing (Intelligent Expert System) ReNeW Thrust 15 Integrated Model Objectives: • Develop predictive modeling capability for nuclear components and associated systems that are science-based, wellcoupled, and validated by experiments and data collection. • Extend models to cover synergistic physical phenomena for prediction and interpretation of integrated tests and for optimization of systems. • Develop methodologies to integrate with plasma models to jointly supply first wall and divertor temperature and stress levels, electromagnetic responses, surface erosion, etc. 2 An integrated model tool potentially contributes to more efficient FNST R&D • Provide high level of accuracy and substantially reduce risk and cost for the development of complex plasma chamber in-vessel components • Facilitate simulation of normal and off normal operational scenarios. • Offer capabilities for system optimization • Allow insight and intuition into the interplay between key multi-physics phenomena (occurring at a level where instruments cannot be installed.) • Better understand the state of the operation through limited diagnostics • The time-dependent BLKT outlet temperature can be used in RELAP5 system code for heating control analysis. • The flow pattern and associated heat transfer inside a FW/BLKT is very complex, which RELAP5 cannot model. FW/BLKT temperature response with time with water inlet temperature at 10K/h ramp-up rate. 376.5 Baking at inlet T increase at 10K/h 376 Tinlet Toutlet T_Max T_Min Cu Be Shield-SS FW-SS 375.5 BLKT-12 CATIA model Shield Module 375 374.5 374 373.5 373 FW (Be) 372.5 0 200 400 600 Time (s) “ITER Baking in progress” 800 1000 3 1200 CAD-centric modeling tools are being used in the US ITER FW/Blanket Shield Design (design by analysis) (led by Mike Hechler-ORNL and Mike Ulrickson-SNL) Mechanical load under a disruption Snapshots of velocity magnitudes at different pipes (BLKT-12 SM) Nuclear heating profile CFD/thermo-fluid X-Y plane (8 cm above mid-plane) 4 FW/BLKT-12 Design by analysis incorporating CAD model becomes even more important in regard to first wall panels shaped as local limiters ITER FW/shield design still evolving • The heat flux profile is extremely non-uniform: heat flux as high as 5 MW/m2 (7.5 MW start-up and ramp down), 40% of wall EHF modules • A shaped FW design brings forth the importance of using “prototype” in the analysis location Peak heat flux Rows or panels affected Inboard : start-up 4.4 MW/mm² 3,4 Outboard 3.6 MW/m² 14,15,16,17 Shine thru 4.0 MW/m² 6 panels on rows 15,16 Top 4.6 MW/m² 7-8-9-10 In recent design, slot was removed Reference: R. Mitteau et. al., Heat loads and shape design of the ITER first wall, ISFNT-9 (2009) CuCrZr CuCrZrVon Mises (Pa) 5 Simulation performed on an engineering CAD model allows practical design assessments High temperature at upper structures • Location of the instrument and the associated perturbation to the data • Analysis with a detailed geometric drawing with instrumentations in-place needed Velocity :m/s Initial results with simplified geometry & operating condition PbLi velocity PbLi velocity Mid-plane nuclear heating (gamma: left; neutron: right) W/cc Thermomechanics Analysis Inlet to 2nd FW cooling panel Proper manifold designs to provide uniform flow distributions among many parallel flow paths Adequate cooing to all parts DCLL He-coolant inlet manifold Stress concentration He-velocity ISPC can potentially reduce risk and cost of the component development 6 7 What numerical software are available for CAD-centric integrated model? (many neutronics codes available: deterministic or Monte Carlo) MCNP(X) MCNPX Native Geometry ITER 40o A-lite Neutronic model MOAB & CGM CAD Voxels (Other) DAG-MCMP ITER FW Panel Attila: Commercial Software Tetrahedral mesh Attila is now being used MCNP – MCAM to calculate radioactivity Community Developed of components Orthogonal mesh Hybrid code ADVANTG ORNL (MCNP + Denovo) 8 Total (neutron + photon) flux Solving individual physics using its optimized numerical technique and running simultaneously with a smart transfer of information • Adopting one numerical technique for all simulations in ISPC can limit the size of the problem and is undesirable. Overcoming CAD discrepancy (e.g. overlapping) is common source of difficulty for MCNP Sample analysis codes and mesh requirements in ISPC Physics Analysis code Mesh specification Neutronics MCNP Monte Carlo mesh tally (cell based) Attila Unstructured tetrahedral mesh (node based) OPERA (Cubit) Unstructured tetrahedral (Hex-) mesh (node based) ANSYS Unstructured Hex/Tet mesh (node based and edge based formulations) CFD/ Thermofluids SC/Tetra Unstructured hybrid mesh (node based) Fluent/CFX etc. Unstructured hybrid mesh (cell based) MHD HIMAG Unstructured hybrid mesh (cell based) Electromagnetics Structural analysis ANSYS/ ABAQUS Unstructured second order Hex/Tet mesh (node based) Species transport COMSOL or others: TMAP, ASPEN Unstructured second order mesh (node based) Safety RELAP5-3D MELOCR System representation code DAG-MCNP (UW) Imprinting A F B D Merging E C 9 A multi-disciplinary effort • Integration of computational software forms the heart of FNST performance prediction • Data mapping and interpolation across various analysis meshes/codes has to be fast, accurate and satisfy physical conservation laws • Large scale simulation, leading-edge high performance computing, advanced computational methods, and the development and application of new mathematical models Verification & Validation Radioactivity Transmutation Neutronics Radiation damage rates Thermofluid MHD Species (e.g. T2) transport Structure/ thermomechanics Electromagnetics Coupled effect Special module Safety e.g. source Material database/Constitutive equations/ Irradiation effect Mesh services Adaptive mesh/ mesh refinement Data Management: Interpolation Neutral format Time step control for transient analysis Visualization Partitioning Parallelism CAD- Geometry 10 ISPC Design Process Flow FW/Plasma Facing Surface Phenomena • Maintain consistency in the geometric representation among the analysis codes • The CAD-based solid model is the common q profile element across physical disciplines FW/PFC Thermo-fluid Neutron source profile Neutronics CAD Model Electromagnetics DMS q” * DMS FUN Thermo-fluid & LM MHD 3-D design iterative DMS * Stress/DeformationAnalysis assessment important FUN Specialized physics models Structural Support Tremendous work for ITER FW/SB at SNL specialized user FUNction Data Mapping Script Species Transport FUN Safety or Transient events Need experimental data for code verification & validation Within ITER project, some R&D being carried out and providing data for design support and code benchmark US-CHF-200638 Data (2 MW/m2) Calcualtion (No constraint) Data (3MW/m2) Calculation (No constrain) Data (4MW/m2) Calcualtion (No constraint) Data (4.6MW/m2) Calculation (No constraint) 320 300 260 2mpers-RF TC-01 TC-03 TC-05 SC/T-01 SC/T-03 SC/T-05 240 220 280 200 180 260 160 240 140 220 120 60 TC locations: 12 mm from the side and 1.5 mm from the top 70 80 90 100 110 120 Time (s) 200 0 2 4 6 distance into heating (cm) 8 10 TCs installed in the mockup have provided data Jet impingement 10 10 RF-CHF He inlet 150 US-CHF mock-up Verification/validation needed on integration method He outlet Temperature and He flow 12 characteristics under 10 MW/m2 “How to” incorporate a bigger resource into ISPC? Similar efforts are being pursued in various fields: • within DOE Vision 21 project (Improved asset optimization by integrating ASPEN PLUS and FLUENT) • Nuclear Energy and Simulation Hub • FSP (Fusion Simulation Project) Advanced computational tools are continuously being developed in various projects: SciDAC, ITAPS, CCA, etc. Nuclear Energy Innovation Hub “to apply existing modeling and simulation capabilities to create a user environment that allows engineers to create a simulation of a currently operating reactor that will act as a "virtual model" of that reactor.---” • Look for synergism • Not re-inventing the wheel but riding on state-of-the-art methodology 13 Next Steps How do you see this moving forward? Three activities (ITER FW/shield design, TBM program, and FNSF assessment study) provide mechanism, panorama, and opportunity for the development/ benchmark/test of the idea to the extent possible. However, a substantial effort requires FSP-like or NESH-like commitment Near term goal • Continue to build/enhance interface and data management (increase degree of automation) • Establish test cases to further explore the limit of the capability Example test cases • Enhance existing neutronics computational platform for TBM radioactive dose calculations extended to ITER port cell area • FNSF tritium breeding assessment through a complete 3-D base breeding blanket exploratory design analysis • Develop schemes to link to plasma facing surface phenomena, and address FW tritium inventory and permeation losses • Periodic recovery of implanted tritium has an impact on the TBR requirement; however, its degree of impact is affected by losses from tritium permeation into FW coolant 14 Summary • Adopt the state-of-the-art computer technique, high-powered computing, advanced modeling and simulation that is 3-dimensional, high-resolution • Develop highly integrated predictive capabilities for many cross-cutting scientific & engineering disciplines and deliver faster and more detailed insights into the R&D of in-vessel FNST components and systems Imagine if critical performance parameters can be projected and examined in advance---- Troidal coil First wall /Blanket Plasma Test Blanket Module(TBM) • The goal of an integrated simulation effort then is to be able to model and design a complete DEMO system including irradiation effects, thermofluid/MHD, temperatures and mechanical loads, tritium accountability in entire system (tritium retention, and tritium production and transport processes), and FW/divertor erosion. Divertor 6.2m 15