Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience <<<<< An introduction to the Tourism PPP. The Turespaña experience Joan-Carles Cambrils Cabinet Chief of the Spanish General Directorate of Tourism <<<<< Moscow, 15 March 2010 Moscow, 15 March 2010 1 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience CONTENTS 1. Characteristics of the public-private partnerships 2. Reasons for public-private partnership 3. Examples of public-private partnership 4. Scope of public-private partnership at Turespaña 5. Forms of public-private partnership at Turespaña 6. Results of public-private partnership at Turespaña 7. Pros and cons 8. Recommendations Moscow, 15 March 2010 2 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience CONTENTS 1. Characteristics of the public-private partnerships 2. Reasons for public-private partnership 3. Examples of public-private partnership 4. Scope of public-private partnership at Turespaña 5. Forms of public-private partnership at Turespaña 6. Results of public-private partnership at Turespaña 7. Pros and cons 8. Recommendations Moscow, 15 March 2010 3 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 1.1. DEFINITIONS OF PPP (1) Legal forms of cooperation between public authorities and the world of business which aim to ensure the funding, construction, renovation, management or maintenance of an infrastructure or the provision of a service. (source: GREEN PAPER, European Commission). Moscow, 15 March 2010 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 1.1. DEFINITIONS OF PPP (2) A cooperative venture between the public and private sectors, built on the expertise of each partner, that best meets clearly defined public needs through the appropriate allocation of resources, risks and rewards. It relates to the provision of public services or public infrastructure. Second, it necessitates the transfer of risk between partners. (Source: The Canadian Council for Public-Private Partnerships) Moscow, 15 March 2010 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 1.1. DEFINITIONS OF PPP (3) Forms of cooperation between Public and Private Tourism Agents in different levels of commitment: low participation, projects cooperation or stable partnership. Moscow, 15 March 2010 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 1.1. DEFINITIONS OF PPP (4) PUBLIC PRIVATE An agreement between private and public sector agents to undertake a particular project in line with at least one of the two principles below: Joint decision-making. Joint risk/financing. Moscow, 15 March 2010 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 1.2. SCOPE OF TPPP General issues about the tourism system. Tourism marketing (mainly Communication, research and product development) Tourism Quality policies. Education and trainning Moscow, 15 March 2010 8 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 1.3. FORMS OF TPPP PPP in Tourism Decision/Management SOFT IMPACT Agreements Advisory bodies Public Incentives Association Foundation NTO’s, Autonom. Organism, Institute, Tourist Boards Consortium STRONG IMPACT NTA’s, Public Administrations 100% PUBLIC Moscow, 15 March 2010 Societies, Corporations 100% PRIVATE Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience CONTENTS 1. Characteristics of the public-private partnerships 2. Reasons for public-private partnership 3. Examples of public-private partnership 4. Scope of public-private partnership at Turespaña 5. Forms of public-private partnership at Turespaña 6. Results of public-private partnership at Turespaña 7. Pros and cons 8. Recommendations Moscow, 15 March 2010 10 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 2. REASONS FOR PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP 1st reason: The best tourism experiences enjoy public and private goods and services. Many environmental and cultural goods (that are tourism attractions) are public goods (non excludability, non rivality). Particular TPPP can reduce or avoid the “parasitism” and the “lost of communal goods” Moscow, 15 March 2010 11 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience Private goods Public goods Moscow, 15 March 2010 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 2nd reason: External effects (+ and -) caused by tourism activity. “Upset somebody’s welfare without his consent” ¿Why the external effects happens? The general welfare balance the environmental negative effects. It’s difficult to quantify the negative/positive effects in money. The property rights are not clearly defined. Moscow, 15 March 2010 13 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience (cont.) 2nd reason: External effects (+ and -) caused by tourism activity. Private/Public agreements for solutions to the external effects: A) Awareness of the problem with public campaigns: ethic change. B) Negotiation by those involved, stipulating a price for welfare o discomfort. C) Penalize or grant for the external effects. Effect of a + externality Moscow, 15 March 2010 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience Cambrige (Eng) Moscow, 15 March 2010 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 3rd reason: the economic - touristic cycle of destination: Long term medial costs are increasing. Number of tourists Rejuvenation Stagnancy Consolidación Downhill Development Implication Exploration Time Moscow, 15 March 2010 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience Long term global medial cost of tourism production, consequence of the law of decreasing marginal N.B. the economic productivity downturn accelerates Global medial cost (short term) New destination this commitment: more efficient choice of public/private investments and mk actions Mass destination Medium size destination (long term) Global medial cost = explicit costs + opportunity costs Moscow, 15 March 2010 Q= trips or inclusive tours Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience In order to correct this problem, Turespaña has promoted the consortiums for requalifying a few mature destinations Moscow, 15 March 2010 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 4th reason: sustainability. Next generation should be able to use the same amount of natural capital. People and NGOs are endogenous resources taking important economic decisions. New culture/new governance of tourism that supports Turespaña: shared Leadership with all the actors. Spanish Tourism Council Mesa de la calidad (Quality Advisory Council) Moscow, 15 March 2010 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience CONTENTS 1. Characteristics of the public-private partnerships 2. Reasons for public-private partnership 3. Examples of public-private partnership 4. Scope of public-private partnership at Turespaña 5. Forms of public-private partnership at Turespaña 6. Results of public-private partnership at Turespaña 7. Pros and cons 8. Recommendations Moscow, 15 March 2010 20 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 3. EXAMPLES OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP SPAIN (national level) Turespaña: autonomical body for marketing: 100% public. Segittur: a 100% public national company for research and new technologies. Paradores: a 100% public national hotel company, with nearly a 100 establishments, most of them monumental buildings, located in strategic places. Advisory bodies and consortiums: TPPP Moscow, 15 March 2010 21 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 3. EXAMPLES OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP SPAIN (local level) Convention Bureau: non-profit making associations. More than a 100 local constituted or in process TPPP (with a Turespaña grant). Moscow, 15 March 2010 1 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 3. EXAMPLES OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP Visit London: Public Limited Company, P-P shareholders Berlin Tourismus Marketing Gmbh: 85% private capital, 15% public capital (land of Berlin) Amsterdam Tourism & Convention Board (ATCB): Private non-profit association set up with public and private capital. Depended on by five private companies with legal personality (marketing, bookings, congresses, information and advisory). Wonderful Copenhagen (WOCO): private non-profit entity (business foundation) with public/private capital. Marketing Manchester: commercial company with 50% public/private capital (source: FEMP) Moscow, 15 March 2010 23 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience CONTENTS 1. Characteristics of the public-private partnerships 2. Reasons for public-private partnership 3. Examples of public-private partnership 4. Scope of public-private partnership at Turespaña 5. Forms of public-private partnership at Turespaña 6. Results of public-private partnership at Turespaña 7. Pros and cons 8. Recommendations Moscow, 15 March 2010 24 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 4. SCOPE OF PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AT TURESPAÑA 4.1. The 2020 Spanish Tourism Plan is a PPP outcome WHAT'S THE PLAN? All public administrations and all agents in the industry are committed to making the Spanish Tourism System more competitive and sustainable by 2020 for the wellbeing of the wider community. HOW WAS IT DONE? Through an open debate between the public and private sector to examine Spain's position and tackle the challenges posed by new trends. Over 35,000 tourists WHO TOOK PART? Moscow, 15 March 2010 Over 100 industry experts Over 2,000 industry representatives All public administrations 25 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 4. SCOPE OF PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AT TURESPAÑA 4.2. Spanish Council of Tourism • A TPPP, the Spanish Council of Tourism approved the 2020 Plan. It was officially supported by the Autonomous Community Conference and the National Government. 54 MEMBERS (19 from Autonomous Communities, 4 from Spanish Federation of Municipalities and Provinces (FEMP), 4 from the State Tourist Board, 6 from the Spanish Confederation of Business Organisations (CEOE), 6 Chambers, 4 Syndicates, 9 of repute) It has advisory functions Frequency: It meets usually twice a year. Moscow, 15 March 2010 26 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 4. SCOPE OF PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AT TURESPAÑA 4.3. Spanish Tourism Strategies 2020 1. New Tourism Economy Knowledge 2. Value for customers Innovation Capturing talent 3.Sustainability 4. Competitive environment Tourism, the environment and society Legal framework and simplification 2020 positioning Tourist destination planning and management Cooperative culture Helping to sell Regeneration of mature tourist destinations Competitive Industry-wide Plans Deseasonalisation and redressing regional balance Accessibility of tourism Perceived quality Experimental Spain 4. Shared leadership Moscow, 15 March 2010 27 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 4. SCOPE OF PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AT TURESPAÑA 4.3. Spanish Tourism Strategies 2020 a. Knowledge / Innovation (e.g.) Agreement with the National Council of Chambers (INTELITUR) MK research Agreements with the Instituto Tecnológico Hotelero - CEHAT training Boosting PP innovation clusters (THINKTUR) innovation Moscow, 15 March 2010 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 4. SCOPE OF PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AT TURESPAÑA 4.3. Spanish Tourism Strategies 2020 b. Building a more sustainable / more competitive model of tourism (e.g.) Boosting quality, quality incentives (Q label, Instituto de la Calidad Turística Española) Plans for re-qualifying mature destinations with local PP partners Moscow, 15 March 2010 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 4. SCOPE OF PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AT TURESPAÑA 4.3. Spanish Tourism Strategies 2020 c. Building value for customers / Helping to sell (e.g.) Agreements with companies to jointly fund product campaigns. Joint destinations promotion with PP tourist destinations/brands Agreements with PP partners for press trips. Moscow, 15 March 2010 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience CONTENTS 1. Characteristics of the public-private partnerships 2. Reasons for public-private partnership 3. Examples of public-private partnership 4. Scope of public-private partnership at Turespaña 5. Forms of public-private partnership at Turespaña 6. Results of public-private partnership at Turespaña 7. Pros and cons 8. Recommendations Moscow, 15 March 2010 31 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 5. FORMS OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AT TURESPAÑA (i) PP signed Agreements - Agreements, arrangements for dissemination, raising awareness - Agreement with TT.OO. to recommend Q qualified establishments - Agreements, arrangements for Promotion/helping to sell. - CoMK with Air Europe, Monarch, TUI, REWE, ABTA,… Moscow, 15 March 2010 32 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 5. FORMS OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AT TURESPAÑA (i) PP signed Agreements - Agreements, arrangements for Training/quality - Co finance the biggest Tourism postgraduate university network- SICTUR - Agreements, arrangements for Sponsorship - Eurobasket 2014, Madrid Tennis Open, Pan European Golf, Liverpool F.C., Spanish Basketball and Football Federations and Moto GP. Moscow, 15 March 2010 33 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 5. FORMS OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AT TURESPAÑA (ii) Advisory entities Creation and participation in the Spanish Council of Tourism (for advisory purposes) Quality Advisory Council Group of MK experts asses over the new Spain creativity Moscow, 15 March 2010 1 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 5. FORMS OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AT TURESPAÑA (ii) Incentives to the private participation in public programs Co-finance Q label Support European Charter for Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas (ECST) Support to innovation tourism clusters (25 Agrupaciones Empresariales Innovadoras) Cofinance IT trainnig (Plan Avanza) Support to the creation on Local TPPP Moscow, 15 March 2010 35 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 5. FORMS OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AT TURESPAÑA (iv) Participation in legal institutions, sharing responsibilities to all levels, like consortiums Mallorca, Costa del Sol, Gran Canaria Moscow, 15 March 2010 1 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience CONTENTS 1. Characteristics of the public-private partnerships 2. Reasons for public-private partnership 3. Examples of public-private partnership 4. Scope of public-private partnership at Turespaña 5. Forms of public-private partnership at Turespaña 6. Results of public-private partnership at Turespaña 7. Pros and cons 8. Recommendations Moscow, 15 March 2010 37 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 6. RESULTS OF PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AT TURESPAÑA (2009) i. 260 agreements with private companies and associations to carry out joint activities ii. Total investments of €63 million (43% Turespaña-40% private sector-17% other public administrations) in co-MK. Induced private/other public investments: €31 million. iii. Over 2,500 firms hold the Q quality label iv. 30 innovation clusters set up (€3.8 million in funding) v. 38 Projects of the Avanza training plan (€4 million in funding) vi. 17 competiveness plans and 3 destination requalifying plans Moscow, 15 March 2010 38 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience CONTENTS 1. Characteristics of the public-private partnerships 2. Reasons for public-private partnership 3. Examples of public-private partnership 4. Scope of public-private partnership at Turespaña 5. Forms of public-private partnership at Turespaña 6. Results of public-private partnership at Turespaña 7. Observed pros and cons 8. Recommendations Moscow, 15 March 2010 39 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 7. OBSERVED PROS AND CONS CONS PROS Powerful tool for implementing Need of an strategy results policies more effectively: MK, oriented: P&P have different quality, awareness, innovation. goals. Share of information, resources, risks and rewards. Move actors to a new cooperation culture . Lack of experience in PP cooperation Lack of institutional support Need of market incomes Disproportionate Government role Moscow, 15 March 2010 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience CONTENTS 1. Characteristics of the public-private partnerships 2. Reasons for public-private partnership 3. Examples of public-private partnership 4. Scope of public-private partnership at Turespaña 5. Forms of public-private partnership at Turespaña 6. Results of public-private partnership at Turespaña 7. Pros and cons 8. Recommendations Moscow, 15 March 2010 41 Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience 8. RECOMMENDATIONS Understand why a TPPP. Share vision and objectives Adapt national/regional laws Share risks Professional management Team work Mesuared results. Believe on your partnership: a PP and positive attitude Moscow, 15 March 2010 effective cooperation requires a decided Tourism PPP. The TURESPAÑA experience <<<<< THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR ATTENTION www.spain.info www.tourspain.es <<<<< joancarles.cambrils@tourspain.es Moscow, 15 March 2010 43