John 1:12
12
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Are mitochondria really just bacterial symbionts?
Timothy G. Standish, Ph. D.
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Outline
Mitochondria A very brief overview
Endosymbiosis Theory and evidence
Archaezoa Eukaryotes lacking mitochondria
Gene expression Mitochondrial proteins coded in the nucleus
Mitochondrial genetic codes
Gene transport Mitochondria to nucleus
Conclusions
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Mitochondria
Mitochondria are organelles found in most eukaryotic organisms.
The site of Krebs cycle and electron transport energy producing processes during aerobic respiration
Are inherited only from the mother during sexual reproduction in mammals and probably all other vertebrates.
Because of their mode of inheritance genetic material found in mitochondria appears to be useful in determining the maternal lineage of organisms.
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Matrix
Inter membrane space
Mitochondria
Outer membrane
Inner membrane mtDNA
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Extranuclear DNA
Mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own DNA
This extranuclear DNA exhibits non-Mendelian inheritance
Recombination is known between some mt and ctDNAs
Extranuclear DNA may also be called cytoplasmic DNA
Generally mtDNA and ctDNA is circular and contains genes for multimeric proteins, some portion of which are also coded for in the nucleus
Extranuclear DNA has a rate of mutation that is independent of nuclear DNA
Generally, but not always, all the RNAs needed for transcription and translation are found in mtDNA and ctDNA, but only some of the protein genes
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
mtDNA
Mitochondrial DNA is generally small in animal cells, about 16.5 kb
In other organisms sizes can be more than an order of magnitude larger
Plant mtDNA is highly variable in size and content with the large Arabidopsis mtDNA being 200 kb.
The largest known number of mtDNA protein genes is 97 in the protozoan Riclinomonas mtDNA of 69 kb.
“Most of the genetic information for mitochondrial biogenesis and function resides in the nuclear genome, with import into the organelle of nuclear DNA-specified proteins and in some cases small RNAs.” (Gray et al .,1999)
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Origin of Eukaryotes
Two popular theories presupposing naturalism seek to explain the origin of membrane bound organelles:
1 Endosymbiosis to explain the origin of mitochondria and chloroplasts (popularized by Lynn Margulis in 1981)
2 Invagination of the plasma membrane to form the endomembrane system
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Origin of Eukaryotes
Two popular theories presupposing naturalism seek to explain the origin of membrane bound organelles:
1 Endosymbiosis to explain the origin of mitochondria and chloroplasts (popularized by Lynn Margulis in 1981)
2 Invagination of the plasma membrane to form the endomembrane system
Mitochondria
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Origin of Eukaryotes
Two popular theories presupposing naturalism seek to explain the origin of membrane bound organelles:
1 Endosymbiosis to explain the origin of mitochondria and chloroplasts (popularized by Lynn Margulis in 1981)
2 Invagination of the plasma membrane to form the endomembrane system
Mitochondria
Endoplasmic
Reticulum
Chloroplast
Nucleus
Golgi
Body
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Origin of Eukaryotes
Two popular theories presupposing naturalism seek to explain the origin of membrane bound organelles:
1 Endosymbiosis to explain the origin of mitochondria and chloroplasts (popularized by Lynn Margulis in 1981)
2 Invagination of the plasma membrane to form the endomembrane system
Endoplasmic Reticulum
Mitochondria
Nucleus
Chloroplast
Golgi Body
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Most general biology texts list ways in which mitochondria resemble bacteria. Campbell et al.
(1999) list the following:
Mitochondria resemble bacteria in size and morphology.
They are bounded by a double membrane: the outer thought to be derived from the engulfing vesicle and the inner from bacterial plasma membrane.
Some enzymes and inner membrane transport systems resemble prokaryotic plasma membrane systems.
Mitochondrial division resembles bacterial binary fission
They contain a small circular loop of genetic material
(DNA). Bacterial DNA is also a circular loop.
They produce a small number of proteins using their own ribosomes which look like bacterial ribosomes.
Their ribosomeal RNA resembles eubacterial rRNA.
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Mitochondria are not always the size or morphology of bacteria:
– In some Trypanosomes (i.e., Trypanosoma brucei ) mitochondria undergo spectacular changes in morphology that do not resemble bacteria during different lifecycle stages
(Vickermann, 1971)
– Variation in morphology is common in protistans,
“Considerable variation in shape and size of the organelle can occur.” (Lloyd, 1974, p 1)
Mitochondrial division and distribution of mitochondria to daughter cells is tightly controlled by even the simplest eukaryotic cells
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Circular mtDNA replication via D loops is different from replication of bacterial DNA (Lewin, 1997, p 441).
mtDNA is much smaller than bacterial chromosomes.
Mitochondrial DNA may be linear, examples include:
Plasmodium, C. reinhardtii, Ochromonas, Tetrahymena ,
Jakoba (Gray et al., 1999).
Mitochondrial genes may have introns which eubacterial genes typically lack (these introns are different from nuclear introns so they cannot have come from that source) (Lewin, 1997 p 721, 888).
The genetic code in many mitochondria is slightly different from bacteria (Lewin, 1997).
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
A “Missing Link”?
The eukaryotic parasite Giardia has been suggested as a “missing link” between eukaryotes and prokaryotes because it lacks mitochondria (Friend, 1966; Adam, 1991) thus serving as an example of membrane invagination but not endosymbiosis
Giardia also appears to lack smooth endoplasmic reticulum, peroxisomes and nucleoli (Adam, 1991) so these must have either been lost or never evolved
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
A Poor “Missing Link”
As a “missing link” Giardia is not a strong argument due to its parasitic life cycle which lacks an independent replicating stage outside of its vertebrate host
– Transmission is via cysts excreted in feces followed by ingestion
– As an obligate parasite, to reproduce, Giardia needs other more derived (advanced?) eukaryotes
Some other free-living Archaezoan may be a better candidate
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Origin of
Giardia and other eukaryotes lacking mitochondria and plastids (Metamonada, Microsporidia, and Parabasalia ) have been grouped by some as “Archaezoa” (Cavalier-
Smith, 1983; Campbell et al ., 1999 p 524-6)
This name reflects the belief that these protozoa split from the group which gained mitochondria prior to that event.
The discovery of a mitochondrial heat shock protein
(HSP60) in Giardia lamblia (Soltys and Gupta, 1994) has called this interpretation into question.
Other proteins thought to be unique to mitochondria,
HSP70 (Germot et al ., 1996), chaperonin 60 (HSP60)
(Roger et al ., 1996; Horner et al ., 1996) and HSP10 (Bui et al.
, 1996) have shown up in Giardia ’s fellow
Archaezoans
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Origin of Archaezoa
The authors who reported the presence of mitochondrial genes in amitochondrial eukaryotes all reinterpreted prevailing theory in saying that mitochondria must have been present then lost after they had transferred some of their genetic information to the nucleus.
The hydrogenosome, a structure involved in carbohydrate metabolism found in some Archaezoans (Muller, 1992), is now thought to represent a mitochondria that has lost its genetic information completely and along with that loss, the ability to do the Krebs cycle (Palmer, 1997).
Alternative explanations include transfer of genetic material from other eukaryotes and the denovo production of hydrogenosomes by primitive eukaryotes.
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Origin of Archaezoa:
Mitochondrial Acquisition
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Origin of Archaezoa:
Gene Transfer and Loss mtGenes
Lost genetic material
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Origin of Archaezoa:
Option 1 - Mitochondrial Eukaryote Production
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Origin of Archaezoa:
Option 2 - Mitochondrial DNA Loss/
Hydrogenosome production
Hydrogenosome
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Origin of Archaezoa:
Option 2A - Mitochondria/Hydrogenosome Loss
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Steps in Mitochondrial Acquisition:
The Serial Endosymbiosis Theory
Fusion of Rickettsia with either a nucleus containing Archaezoan or an archaebacterium
Rickettsia
Host Cell
Primitive eukaryote
DNA reduction/transfer to nucleus
Ancestral eukaryote
(assuming a nucleus)
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Steps in Mitochondrial Acquisition:
The Hydrogen Hypothesis
Hydrogen producing proteobacterium
Fusion of proteobacterium with an archaebacterium
Hydrogen requiring archaebacterium
DNA reduction/transfer nucleus production
Ancestral eukaryote
With nucleus containing both archaebacterium and proteobacterium genes
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Bacteria
Phylogeny
Microsporidia, and Parabasalia Metamonada mtDNA loss
Hydrogenosome/ mitochondria loss mtDNA loss
Eukaryota Bacteria
Gene transfer
Cell fusion
Origin of Life
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Timing of Gene Transfer
Because gene transfer occurred in eukaryotes lacking mitochondria, and these are the lowest branching eukaryotes known:
Gene transfer must have happened very early in the history of eukaryotes.
The length of time for at least some gene transfer following acquisition of mitochondria is greatly shortened.
No plausible mechanism for movement of genes from the mitochondria to the nucleus exists although intraspecies transfer of genes is sometimes invoked to explain the origin of other individual nuclear genes.
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Cytoplasmic Production of
Mitochondrial Proteins
Mitochondria produce only a small subset of the proteins used in the Krebs cycle and electron transport. The balance come from the nucleus
As mitochondrial genomes vary spectacularly between different groups of organisms, some of which may be fairly closely related, if all came from a common ancestor, different genes coding for mitochondrial proteins must have been passed between the nucleus and mitochondria multiple times
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Movement of genes between the mitochondria and nucleus seems unlikely for at least two reasons:
1 Mitochondria do not always share the same genetic code with the cell they are in
2 Mechanisms for transportation of proteins coded in the nucleus into mitochondria seem to preclude easy movement of genes from mitochondria to the nucleus
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Protein Production
Mitochondria and Chloroplasts
Nucleus
Export
G AAAAAA
Mitochondrion Chloroplast
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Protein Production
Mitochondria and Chloroplasts
Nucleus
Mitochondrion Chloroplast
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Protein Production
Mitochondria
Outer membrane
Inner membrane
Matrix
Inter membrane space
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Protein Production
Mitochondria
P +ADP
ATP
Leader sequence binding receptor
Outer membrane
ATP
P +ADP
Inner membrane
Inter membrane
Matrix
Protein Production
Mitochondria
Leader sequence binding receptor
Outer membrane
Peptidease cleaves off the leader
Inner membrane
Inter membrane
Matrix
Protein Production
Mitochondria
Leader sequence binding receptor
Outer membrane
Inner membrane
Inter membrane
Matrix
Protein Production
Mitochondria
Leader sequence binding receptor
Outer membrane
Inner membrane
Inter membrane
Matrix
Protein Production
Mitochondria
Leader sequence binding receptor
Outer membrane
Matrix
Hsp60
Chaperones
Hsp60
Inner membrane
Inter membrane
Protein Production
Mitochondria
Leader sequence binding receptor
Outer membrane
Matrix
Mature protein
Inner membrane
Inter membrane
M
L
L
S
I
S
Nonpolar
F
F
K
Q
P
A
T
R
Polar
C
S
S
T
R
L
Y
P
L
Yeast Cytochrome C
Oxidase Subunit IV Leader
First 12 residues are sufficient for transport to the mitochondria
Neutral Non-polar
Polar
Basic
Acidic
ML S L R QS I R FF K PA T R T L CSS R Y LL
This leader does not resemble other eukaryotic leader sequences, or other mtProtein leader sequences.
Probably forms an a helix
This would localize specific classes of amino acids in specific parts of the helix
There are about 3.6 amino acids per turn
Yeast Cytochrome C1 Leader
Charged leader sequence signals for transport to mitochondria
First cut
MF SN L S KR WA Q R T L S K T L K GS K S AA GT A TSY F E -
K LV T A G VAAA G I T A ST LL Y A N S L T A G A--------------
Uncharged second leader sequence signals for transport
Second cut across inner membrane into the intermembrane space
Cytochrome c functions in electron transport and is thus associated with the inner membrane on the
Neutral Non-polar
Polar
Basic
Acidic intermembrane space side
Cytochrome c1 holds an iron containing heme group and is part of the B-C1 (III) complex
C1 accepts electrons from the Reiske protein and passes them to cytochrome c
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Protein Production
Mitochondria
Outer membrane
Inner membrane
Matrix
Inter membrane space
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Protein Production
Mitochondria
P +ADP
ATP
Leader sequence binding receptor
Outer membrane
ATP
P +ADP
Peptidease cleaves off the leader
Inner membrane
Inter membrane
Matrix
Protein Production
Mitochondria
Leader sequence binding receptor
Outer membrane
Inner membrane
Inter membrane
Matrix
Protein Production
Mitochondria
Leader sequence binding receptor
Outer membrane
Inner membrane
Inter membrane
Matrix
Protein Production
Mitochondria
Leader sequence binding receptor
Outer membrane
Inner membrane
Inter membrane
Matrix
Protein Production
Mitochondria
Leader sequence binding receptor
Outer membrane
Inner membrane
Inter membrane
Matrix
Protein Production
Mitochondria
Leader sequence binding receptor
Outer membrane
Inner membrane
Peptidease cleaves off the second leader
Inter membrane
Matrix
Protein Production
Mitochondria
Leader sequence binding receptor
Outer membrane
Inner membrane
Inter membrane
Matrix
Protein Production
Mitochondria
Leader sequence binding receptor
Outer membrane
Inner membrane
Inter membrane
Matrix
Protein Production
Mitochondria
Note that chaperones are not involved in folding of proteins in the inter membrane space and that they exist in a low pH environment
Leader sequence binding receptor
Outer membrane
Inner membrane
Mature protein
Inter membrane
Matrix
1.
2.
Alternative Mechanism
There are actually two theories about how the leader operates to localize mtproteins in the inter membrane space:
The first, as shown in the previous slides, involves the whole protein moving into and then out of the matrix
The alternative theory suggests that once the first leader, which targets to the mitochondria is removed, the second leader prevents the protein from ever entering the matrix so it is transported only into the inter membrane space.
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Building a Minimally Functional
Nuclear Mitochondrial Gene
Given that a fragment of DNA travels from the mitochondria to the nucleus and is inserted into the nuclear DNA
Nuclear DNA
Control Sequence Signal Sequence Mitochondrial Gene
Additional hurdles may include:
Signal Sequence
Resolution of problems resulting from differences between mitochondrial and nuclear introns
Resolution of problems resulting from differences between mitochondrial and nuclear genetic codes
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Additional Requirements
In addition to addition of appropriate control and leader sequences to mitochondrial genes, the following would be needed:
Recognition and transport mechanisms in the cytoplasm
Leader sequence binding receptors
Peptidases that recognize leader sequences and remove them
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
No Plausible Mechanism Exists
If genes were to move from the mitochondria to the nucleus they would have to somehow pick up the leader sequences necessary to signal for transport before they could be functional
While leader sequences seem to have meaningful portions on them, according to Lewin (1997, p 251) sequence homology between different sequences is not evident, thus there could be no standard sequence that was tacked on as genes were moved from mitochondria to nucleus
Alternatively, if genes for mitochondrial proteins existed in the nucleus prior to loss of genes in the mitochondria, the problem remains, where did the signal sequences come from? And where did the mechanism to move proteins with signal sequences on them come from?
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Variation In Codon Meaning
Lack of variation in codon meanings across almost all phyla is taken as an indicator that initial assignment must have occurred early during evolution and all organisms must have descended from just one individual with the current codon assignments
Exceptions to the universal code are known in a few single-celled eukaryotes, mitochondria and at least one prokaryote
Most exceptions are modifications of the stop codons UAA , UAG and UGA
Organism
Tetrahymena thermophila
A ciliate
Paramecium
A ciliate
Euplotes octacarinatus
A ciliate
Mycoplasma capricolum
A bacteria
Candida
A yeast
Codon/s
UAA UAG
UAA UAG
UGA
UGA
CUG
Common Meaning
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop serine
Modified Meaning glutamine glutamine cysteine tryptophan leucine
Neutral Non-polar, Polar ©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Variation in Mitochondrial
Codon Assignment
AUA=Met
CUN=Thr
Universal
Code
AAA=Asn AUA=Ile
AAA=Asn
UGA /G=Stop
AUA=Met
NOTE - This would mean
AUA changed from Ile to
Met, then changed back to
Ile in the Echinoderms
AGA/G=Ser AAA must have changed from Lys to
Asn twice
UGA=Trp
UGA must have changed to Trp then back to stop
Differences in mtDNA lower the number of tRNAs needed
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Problems Resulting From
Differences in Genetic Codes
Changing the genetic code, even of the most simple genome is very difficult.
Because differences exist in the mitochondrial genomes of groups following changes in the mitochondrial genetic code, mitochondrial genes coding differently must have been transported to the nucleus.
These mitochondrial genes must have been edited to remove any problems caused by differences in the respective genetic codes.
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Behe Goes Beyond
Moustraps
In an essay entitled “Intelligent Design theory as a Tool for Analyzing Biochemical Systems,” Michael Behe encourages researchers to go beyond “simple” biochemical systems and to apply Intelligent Design theory to more complex sub-cellular systems. He specifically poses the question:
“Given that some biochemical systems were designed by an intelligent agent, and given the tools by which we came to that conclusion, how do we analyze other biochemical systems that may be more complicated and less discrete than the ones we have so far discussed?”
(Behe, 1998 p 184)
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
No Modern Examples
Unfortunately for Margulis and S.E.T. [the serial endosymbiotic theory], no modern examples of prokaryotic endocytosis or endosymbioses exist . . . She discusses any number of prokaryotes endosymbiotic in eukaryotes and uses Bdellovibrio as a model for prokaryotic endocytosis.
Bdellovibrios are predatory (or parasitoid) bacteria that feed on E. coli by penetrating the cell wall of the latter and then removing nutrient molecules from E. coli while attached to the outer surface of its plasma membrane. Although it is perfectly obvious that this is not an example of one prokaryote being engulfed by another Margulis continually implies that it is.
P.J. Whitfield, review of “Symbiosis in Cell Evolution,” Biological
Journal of the Linnean Society 18 [1982]:77-78; p 78)
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Conclusions
Presence of mitochondrial genes in nuclear DNA reduces the window of time available for mitochondrial acquisition in eukaryotes.
Understanding the structure of mitochondrial genes in the nucleus and how they are expressed makes the transfer of genes from protomitochondria to the nucleus appear complex.
Differences between mitochondrial genetic codes and nuclear genetic codes adds to the complexity of gene transfer between mitochondria and nucleus.
As molecular data accumulates, the endosymbiotic origin of mitochondria appears less probable.
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
M
PCR of Human mtDNA
Single nucleotide polymorphisms are common in the mtDNA control region. These can be used to identify remains and determine maternal linage due to the maternal inheritance of mitochondria
Single 460 bp mtDNA control region fragment which is polymorphic in sequence, but not size
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
tRNA Pro
440 bp fragment
Human mtDNA
0
0
1,260
Control region,
D-Loop,
Or hypervariable region
15,971
Left primer
16,411
Right primer
16,569 bp
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
The Amplified Segment gaaaaagtct t taactccac cattagcacc caaagctaag
Attctaattt aaactattct ctg ttctttc atggggaagc agatttgggt accacccaag tattgactca cccatcaaca accgctatgt atttcgtaca ttactgccag ccaccatgaa tattgtacgg taccataaat acttgaccac ctgtagtaca taaaaaccca atccacatca aaaccccctc cccatgctta caagcaagta cagcaatcaa ccctcaacta tcacacatca actgcaactc caaagccacc cctcacccac taggatacc
Acaaacctac ccacccttaa cagtacatag Tacataaagc catttaccgt acatagcaca ttacagtcaa atcccttctc
Gtccccatgg atgacccccc tcagataggg gtcccttgac caccatcctc c gtga
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
The Amplified Segment
5’ ct t taactccaccattagcacccaaagctaag…
5’ ttaactccaccattagca
3’
3’ …tcagataggggtcccttgaccaccatcctc c gt
3’ ggaactggtggtaggagg
5’
Following are what I suspect the primers to be:
– Right Primer 5’ ggaggatggtggtcaagg 3’ TM 58.80
– Left Primer 5’ ttaactccaccattagca
3’ TM 49.71
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
The Amplified Segment
5’ ct t taactccaccattagcacccaaagctaag…
5’ ttaactccaccattagca 3’ cc
3’
…tcagataggggtcccttgaccaccatcctc c gt 3’
3’ ggaactggtggtaggagg 5’
This would up TM and stabilize 3’ end of the primer
Following are what I suspect the primers to be:
– Right Primer 5’ ggaggatggtggtcaagg
3’ TM 58.80
– Left Primer 5’ ttaactccaccattagca 3’ TM 49.71
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Human mtDNA Genes
Genes in human (for which numbers are given) and other mammalian mitochondria can be divided into three groups: tRNA genes - 22 rRNA genes - 2
Protein coding genes - 13
Total genes = 37
All protein coding genes are involved in respiration
Aside from the coding portion of genes there is very little additional DNA except in the approximately 1,200 bp control region
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
Location Strand Length Gene Product
3307..4263
+ 318 ND1 NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1
4470..5513
+ 347
5904..7445
+ 513
ND2 NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2
COX1 cytochrome c oxidase subunit I
7586..8269
+ 227
8366..8572
+ 68
8527..9207
+ 226
9207..9989
+ 260
COX2 cytochrome c oxidase subunit II
ATP8 ATP synthase F0 subunit 8
ATP6 ATP synthase F0 subunit 6
COX3 cytochrome c oxidase subunit III
10059..10406 + 115
10470..10766 + 98
10760..12139 + 459
12337..14148 + 603
14149..14673 - 174
14747..15883 + 378
ND3 NADH dehydrogenase subunit 3
ND4L NADH dehydrogenase subun 4L
ND4 NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4
ND5 NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5
ND6 NADH dehydrogenase subunit 6
CYTB cytochrome b
©2001 Timothy G. Standish
©2001 Timothy G. Standish