Conceptual Framework for PPPs Presentation to the Planning Board May 2007 PV Ravi Infrastructure Development Corporation (Karnataka) Limited 1 Definition A Public Private Partnership is an arrangement between a public (government) entity & a private (nongovernment) entity by which services that have traditionally been delivered by the public entity are provided by the private entity under a set of terms and conditions that are defined at the outset 2 Characteristics The public entity should have the enabling authority to transfer its responsibility – enabling legislative & policy framework, administrative order – the instrument of transfer is through a contract There is usually a significant transfer of responsibility to the private entity – and usually includes financial investment obligations For a payment to the private entity – directly by users or by the public entity such that - a significant portion of project revenues and/ or the payments, are conditional on achieving pre-specified levels of performance The nature of the relationship is usually long-term 3 Risk Sharing A risk is defined as any factor, event or influence that could threaten the successful completion of a project in terms of time, cost or quality In a conventional BOQ based implementation : risks – planning, design, construction, environmental & social, physical damage and financing are evaluated Commercial risks – revenue or maintenance costs, quality, safety of users and general regulatory risks – not critically evaluated – this is critical though to a private investor PPP involves sharing of risks – risk allocated to the party best suited to manage them 4 Why PPPs? Fiscal reasons - Inadequacy of resources – leveraging on lower government funding Optimal transfer of risks – to the entity best suited to manage the risks Design, Financing, Construction, Operations and Maintenance – all are commercially understood and manageable Change of scope, defective designs, time overrun, cost overruns, leakage of revenues, high maintenance costs Transfer of responsibilities – efficiency gain Appropriate technology, innovative design solutions, project management, better collection practices, life cycle costing 5 Other Reasons Enhanced bankability – more rigorous project preparation Incentive to deliver whole life solution – not just asset creation Focus shifts to service delivery – integrated with construction, measurement of quality & payment linked to service delivery Acceleration of programme – time-bound implementation Better overall management of public services – transparency in prioritisation, selection and ongoing implementation 6 PPP Options Works & Management & Services Contracts Maintenance Contracts Operation & Maintenance Concessions Build Operate Transfer Concessions Full Privatization High Low Extent of private sector participation 7 Concessions BOT - Build Operate Transfer BOOT - Build Own Operate Transfer BOO - Build Own Operate BOOST - Build Own Operate Share Transfer BOLT - Build Own Lease Transfer DBFO - Design Build Finance Operate OMT - Operate Maintain Transfer 8 Types of PPPs Financially free standing projects Role of public sector - planning, licensing & statutory procedures; no financial support/ payment by government Revenues through levy of user charges by private sector Toll Roads and Bridges, Telecom services, Port projects Projects where Government procures services Private Sector paid a fee (tipping fee), tariff (shadow toll) or periodical charge (annuity) by Government for providing services; payment against performance – no/partial demand risk transfer Risks associated with asset creation (including design) and O&M transferred to private sector Accountability to users for service - retained by Government Roads - annuity/ shadow tolls, power - under PPAs. In the UK prisons, education, health services, defence related services Other Types - Joint ventures, Not-for-Profit vehicles 9 Features of PPPs - 1 Genuine risk transfer All risks pertaining to design, building, financing and operation transferred to the private entity Transfer of demand risk depends on the extent to which the private sector can influence usage Output based Specifications Contracts specify the service outputs required rather than asset configuration/mode of service delivery Emphasis on type of service & performance standards Private entity incentivised to deliver outputs using innovation in design, construction, operation and financing 10 Features of PPPs - 2 Whole life asset performance Private entity takes responsibility & assumes risk for the performance of the asset and delivery of service over a long term Payment for Performance Revenue/ Payment to private entity is subject to performance in relation to specific & quantified criteria enshrined in the contract 11 Value for Money Transfer of risks/ responsibilities under a PPP structure should result in better value for money for the user Telecom sector – mobile phone tariffs from Rs. 16/- per minute to Re.1/- or 50 paise per minute Tolls paid – offset by savings in direct & indirect costs and value of time Annuity payments – public sector comparator – value for money Efficiency gain Savings in cost of project versus overrun Savings in operating costs Revenue maximization - leakages 12 Basic Issues Striking a balance between differing concerns & objectives of parties Legislative Back up Rights and obligations of parties Identification and allocation of risks Penalties and rewards which would ensure performance 13 Broad Roles & Responsibilities Government Agency Providing Project Site/ Assets Environmental Clearances Supporting Infrastructure and Utilities Specific Obligations (e.g. dredging) Regulatory Functions Concessionaire Designing, Engineering, Financing Construction/ augmentation / upgradation Operation and Maintenance Payment and other obligations Transfer of assets at expiry of concession period In exchange the concessionaire has the right to receive revenue – tolls or annuity or any other mechanism 14 Other Key Elements Bankability Issues Concessionaire’s ability to assign rights Lenders’ step-in rights Charge on project assets and enforceability Critical Events and consequences Force Majeure Events of Default Remedial process incase of default/ events leading to termination Protection of debt in the event of termination Supporting Provisions Dispute Resolution Mechanism Re-negotiation in good faith Termination as a last resort Preferential treatment in re-bidding 15 What a PPP is not & what it is PPP is not privatisation or disinvestment PPP is not about borrowing money from the private sector. PPP is more about creating a structure in which greater value for money is achieved for services through private sector innovation and management skills delivering significant improvement in service efficiency levels This means that the public sector no longer builds roads, it purchases miles of maintained highway no longer builds prisons, it buys custodial services no longer operates ports but provides port services through world class operators No longer builds power plants but purchases power 16 Partnership in Practice Partners not adversaries – background of mistrust Project should be the focus – “win-win” for both the parties Independent agencies – Independent Engineer - useful during both implementation and operations Government retains ultimate responsibility – uses the private sector to deliver infrastructure services of specified standard Private Financing – can significantly leverage public funds 17 Basic Features Conventional financing is asset based – debt provided is usually a percentage of project cost linked to the value of asset cover Project Financing is cash flow based - on the estimated cash flows that are generated by the project “A financing structure that relies on future cash flows of a project as the primary source of its servicing & repayment, with only the project assets, rights and interests being the security” There is little or no recourse to the sponsors Usually large projects - investments are huge & costs of non-completion/ unsuccessful operations - affect many Little tangible security All stakeholders would, therefore, like to see it succeed 18 Project Appraisal An elaborate project appraisal process – analysis of risks and specification of return expectations (pricing) from investing in the project Cash flow projections based on technical, market and financial analysis Risk mitigated through project contracts and financing agreements or consciously taken after evaluation Structured financing – to meet the characteristics of the project Security and documentation - elaborate Project monitoring and compliance 19 Typical Funding Sources Equity Capital Core capital provided by the promoters (developers / contractors) Minority stakes may be taken by financial investors / funds Preference Capital Can be used if suitable changes made to the CA Senior Secured Debt Normally in the form of rupee term loans/ debentures from Indian banks/ institutions Capital market instruments – may be possible after CoD; not too popular yet A variant could be debt with 2nd charge Subordinated Debt Typically with far lesser rights May even be unsecured Challenge is to evaluate how additional resources can be channelised into the sector - insurance funds, pension funds 20 Key Project Contracts Concession Agreement Project Site Licence Agreement Shareholder/ JV Agreement Substitution Agreement / Direct Agreement State Support Agreement EPC Contract O&M Contract Trust and Retention Agreement 21 Main Provisions Concession Agreement Terms and conditions of undertaking the project Obligations of the parties Tenor of the contract Default provisions and remedies Provision for substitution Force Majeure provisions and remedies Termination and compensation payments State Support Agreement Support during implementation Protection from a competing facility 22 Other Key Contracts EPC Contract Price Overrun Time Overrun LDs and Bonus provisions Performance security Standards and Specifications O&M Contract Operating Standards Costs Quality of Service Penal provisions TRA Agreement Trapping of all the project cashflows Prioritization of Cash flows 23 Financial Analysis Elaborate Financial Model capturing these risks – base case analysis Establishes breakeven levels of traffic/ tariffs Assessment under various scenarios – sensitivity analysis Demand / Traffic Tariff / Tolls Inflation Maintenance Costs Financial Ratios Debt Equity Ratio – cash flow impact & level of promoters’ funds Internal Rate of Return (project/ equity) Debt Service Coverage Ratio Loan Life Ratio Project Life Ratio 24 Financing Documents Facility Agreement Financial Terms Project Risk Mitigating Conditionalities General Conditions Inter-Creditor Agreements Security Documentation 25 Basic Structure NHAI Annuity Concession Agreement JV Partner Financing Agreements Lenders Project SPV Shhldr’s Agmnt Equity Debt EPC Agmnt LE Contractor Main Sponsor Indep Eng 26 Transaction Structure Sponsors Government Advisers Invt. Bankers, Technical & Legal Advisers Advisers Invt. Bankers, Technical & Legal Advisers Equity Concession / Licence Agreement Financial Investors Equity / Sub-Debt Users TRA Agent Off-take Contracts Insurance Companies Insurance Policies Project SPV O&M Contract TRA/Escrow Agreement O&M Operator EPC Contract Debt Lenders Substitution Agreement EPC Contractor 27 Implementation Structures Existing Assets Full Divestiture – UK – Telecom, Steel, Electricity, Ports, Water, Airlines, Airports; so far in India – Modern Foods, BALCO, Hotels Asset Sales/ Leases – airports in Australia BOT/ ROMT Concessions – roads, tourism facilities, berths in ports Management contracts – water assets, ports in Philippines New Assets Implementation by government – followed by OMT concessions – Mumbai-Pune expressway, Ports in Rotterdam, hospitals Implementation through SPVs – Moradabad bypass or port connectivity projects or dedicated freight corridor for railways BOT Concessions – commonest form – roads, ports, 28 Isn’t Private Infrastructure Expensive? 29 Isn’t Private Infrastructure Expensive? Additions to Cost Benefits Risk Premium Lower Cost From Efficiency Example Public Entity ROI Private Entity 8% WACC 13.7% (Debt @ 11% 70: 30 Equity @ 20%) Cost Required Return 105.3 Cost 100 113.7 Required Return 113.7 A 5.3% cost overrun (increase in actual project cost) in the public sector is enough to overcome the private sector disadvantage of higher financing cost! 30 Isn’t Private Infrastructure Expensive? Additions to Cost Benefits Risk Premium Lower Cost From Efficiency Example Public Entity ROI Private Entity 8% WACC 13.7% (Debt @ 11% 70: 30 Equity @ 20%) Cost Required Return 100 Cost 95 108 Required Return 108 A 5% reduction in project cost (efficiency) by the private sector is enough to overcome the higher financing cost! 31 Key question What should be the framework to induce the private entity make the investments needed to provide efficient service to the end user? Investments decided by the investor or driven by the market, i.e. the consumer Private entity has a stronger case for state support if it makes investments determined by the State Demand risk – how much passed on? Extricate the public entity from making commercial decisions on individual projects, wherever possible Public entity’s role from being a planner, financier & manager to facilitator & regulator 32 The Right Balance The Investor wants The Investor needs Monopoly rights Initial risk mitigation support - can be predefined Full pricing freedom Stable environment regulatory and policy framework State support for social obligations/ viability considerations State support for social obligations/ viability considerations – can be transparently determined 33 Some Indian Examples - 1 Roads BOT Concessions for toll roads and bridges (NHAI, state governments) (OMT Concessions in future) Annuity payment based concessions – highways, urban roads (NHAI/ state governments) Solid Waste Management Engineered landfills – tipping fee linked payments (Bangalore, Trivandrum) SW Collection and Transportation (MCD/ NDMC) Port Concessions Major Ports – container berths (JNPT, Chennai, Kochi, Tuticorin, Vizag, Kandla); bulk cargo berths (Marmagao, Haldia, Ennore, New Mangalore) Minor Ports –Pipavav, Mundra, Kakinada 34 Some Indian Examples - 2 Water Supply and Sanitation – Bulk water supply systems in Tirupur and Vizag Tourism Facilities – hotels, tourist facilities, PWD rest houses – Karnataka & Kerala Bus Terminals/ Parking Facilities Bus terminals – Dehra Dun, Amritsar, Jullundur Parking + commercial complexes – NDMC/ DDA/ MCD/ Bangalore 35 International Experience - 1 Toll Roads (Chile, Mexico, Hungary, Poland); Ports (Argentina, Philippines, Sri Lanka) Airports (Australia, Greece, Germany) Roads in UK under DBFO program Private Finance Initiative of UK – diverse areas Dorset Police Service - $ 40 million contract for refurbishment of police stations, construction of a divisional headquarters building, maintenance, janitorial & waste management services Nottinghamshire, Police Fleet Management Contract - ($ 180 million over 25 years) – driver slots - usage of a vehicle for a 24 hour period Durham & Dunstead Hospital Project, Durham – 30 year, $ 155 million hospital services contract – to construct and operate health care facilities + ancillary services Stoke-On-Trent Grouped Schools Project – a $ 250 million project involving 122 schools – refurbishment and maintenance contract 36 International Experience - 2 Louis Trichardt Maximum Security Prison Project, South Africa – a $ 270 million project – largest prison facility (also UK and Australia) Full fledged water concessions in Argentina (Buenos Aires) and Philippines (Manila); Management contract for water supply & sanitation in Johannesburg, South Africa Rural Pay Phones, Peru – against payment of a subsidy – based on a system of monitoring of service standards 37 On the Table in Karnataka Airport Rail Link Core Ring Road Airport Expressway BMRDA Townships Minor airports Tourism Properties IMTC (Kempegowda) Mega Convention Center, Bangalore Bypass roads Truck terminals … 38