A review on different methodologies employed in current SWE products from spaceborne passive microwave observations Nastaran Saberi, Richard Kelly Interdisciplinary Center on Climate Change (IC3) and Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo, ON, Canada Outline • Introduction – Snow physical properties retrieval using passive microwave observations • Emission Modeling (HUT, MEMLS, DMRT) • SWE Products & Validation Process • Research questions and summary Why measuring snowpack physical properties? Which properties? How? Snow Properties Retrieval Using Passive Microwave RS • Passive microwave observations Brightness temperature: TB – Appropriate frequency channels: 10 GHz-19GHz-37GHz X , Ku, Ka (IEEE) o Goal: Modeling microwave-medium AMSR2 instrument http://www.drroyspencer.com/2012/05/ interactions to retrieve snow physical properties Snow Properties Retrieval Using Passive Microwave RS l = f (x) Snow properties retrieval Empirical approaches SD & TB differences Emission modeling Semiempirical Physical DMRT-ML (Matzler et al., 1982) l : observation(TB ) x : unknown(SD / GS / Rho) MEMLS (Wiesmann and Matzler, 1999) HUT Emission Modeling http://www.iup.uni-bremen.de/iuppage/psa/members/MariaHoerhold.php HUT snowpack emission model Pulliainen et al. (1999) Semi-empirical model, adapted for remote sensing observations 3 2 4 d 1 TB (d -, q ) = TBgs + TBs = TB (0+, q )e-(ke -qks )secq d + kaTs (1- e-(ke -qks )secq d ) ke - qks MEMLS Snowpack emission model A. Wiesmann and C. Matzler (1999) A semi-empirical six-flux radiative transfer model For a multi layered snowpack MEMLS inputs (for each layer of snowpack) o Grain size (correlation length) o LWC o Temperature o Depth o Density For substratum, reflectivity and temperature is needed DMRT-ML Leung Tsang et al. (2000) , Picard et al. (2012) QCA-CP DMRT (ks, ke) DISORT (RT) o Mono disperse, stickiness o Poly disperse, Rayleigh DMRT-ML inputs (for each layer of snowpack) o Grain size (Optical) o Temperature o Depth o Density o Substratum model Emission Models Summary Empirical Physical Calibration Sensitivity Analysis Simplicity Complexity Parsimonious modeling: physics-based | semi-empirical | empirical • Differences HUT, MEMLS, DMRT-ML: – Radiative transfer solution – Wave propagation – Substratum – Representation of a snow grain Snow Depth & Snow Water Equivalent Products Snow Depth and Snow Water Equivalent Products SWE estimation using in-situ data =>sparse observing networks • Data assimilation • Reanalysis snow cover using land surface or snow models Problem: dependency on precipitation data • Satellite passive microwave derived SWE datasets Challenge: complex topography GlobSnow - SWE AMSR2 Snow Depth and Snow Water Equivalent Product by R. Kelly AMSR2 - SWE V2 V1 & V2 :Predicated on the AMSR-E algorithm (2003/4) V1: Regression based, came in response to deficiencies in static algorithm (Kelly ,2009). V2: Physical modeling based (kelly, 2003) V2 Snow Detection based on history of snow Grain size & Density are dynamic Forest correction is model-based Snow Depth/SWE Retrieval using DMRT-ML Atmospheric correction Lake ice addressed RFI determination (10 Ghz) Methods that Use Machine Learning Techniques Neural network Emission model: HUT/MEMLS/DMRT TB 19V SWE/SD TB 37V Training Process TB<->SD/SWE Training dataset Passive microwave observation (TB) Inversion by NN SD/SWE MicroWave Radiation Imager (MWRI) on Feng-Yun 3 Grass Land Bare Soil Farm Land Forest SD=fgrass×SDgrass+ fbarren×Sdbaren+fforest×Sdforest + ffarmland×Sdfarmland SDfarmland= 4.235+0.432×d18h36h+1.074×d89v89h; Validation Process Validation Process General overview of SWE dataset assessment by SnowPEx Statistical Assessment Tools Summary & Research Questions! Challenges in gathering In-situ data • High spatial variability in snow physical properties and limitation in accessibility => Quantifying errors In electromagnetic modeling • Adaptation of physical model to metamorphic processes and a layered snowpack structure, also adapting to spaceborne scale => Key emission controllers of seasonal snow evolution Thank you Aknowledgements: Karem Chokmani