Trait Theories Basic Assumptions and Central Points behavior determined by stable generalized traits basic qualities that exist within a person and express themselves across situations goal of trait psychology: determine those trait dimensions determine where people stand relative to others (indiv. diff.s) Types Vs. Traits types: discrete categories traits: dimensions Allport uniqueness of the individual Cardinal Traits Central Traits Secondary Dispositions Idiographic Vs. Nomothetic Cattell Surface Traits Source Traits Factor Analysis 16 PF Eysenck 3 main factors (really 2) Introversion-Extroversion Neuroticism Psychoticism (antisocial) The Big 5 Psycholexical approach Costa & McCrae Big 5 Openness Conscientiousness Extraversion-(Introversion) Ageeableness Neuroticism OCEAN Common Features traits account for consistency most differentiate between superficial and underlying traits are stable over time and situation focus of research is to find basic dimensions and develop good measures of them Problems/Criticisms of Trait approach Atheoretical ( underlying traits arrived at empirically not theoretically) Tautology (circular reasoning) can describe not explain Is that all there is??? Exaggerate consistency and ignore situation Revision of Trait Theory Types of Consistency (aggregated, if-then) Person X Situation Interaction Signatures (Mischel) “if-then” Assessment Basic assumptions can assess personality by asking traits are quantifiable and scalable behaviors are “signs”, but of underlying traits Common Measures MMPI clinical profiles, objective standardized scoring 10 subcales NEO-PI based on Big 5 global measure of normal personality Reliability Validity Testing problems/criticism re: use of personality testing bias in testing (self-report bias, statistical bias, cultural bias) ethics of testing (privacy, use of test results, etc.) labeling Social policy and decision making