Comparative Law Umar A. Oseni © 2014 Umar A. Oseni. All Rights Reserved. Learning Outcomes Upon completion of this course, the students should be able to – • describe the nature, role and importance of comparative law; • demonstrate the relationship between the major legal systems in the world; • appraise the diversity of law and legal institutions; • conduct comparative legal research in a confident manner; and • explain the relevance of comparative law in the harmonisation of civil law and the SharÄ«‘ah. Class Schedule: Semester 1, 2014/2015 Date Topic Task 12 Feb. Introduction to Comparative Law Ice-breaking & Intro. 26 Feb. Approaches to Comparative Law Quiz & Lecture 5 March Major Legal Systems Discussion & Debate 12 March Variations & Permutations of Comparative Law Quiz & Discussion 19 March Legal Pluralism Discussion & Seminar Mid-Term Break 2 April Comparative Legal Research & Comparative Law in Context Lecture and QnA 9 April Legal Transplants: The Case of Malaysia Quiz, Discussion, & Seminar 16 April Foreign Law in The Malaysian Courts Quiz, Discussion, & Seminar 23 April Codification of Laws in Comparative Perspective Discussion & Seminar 30 April Harmonisation, Convergence and Unification of Laws Lecture & Seminar 7 May The Future of Comparative Law Quiz, Discussion, & Seminar 14 May Feedback on Class Seminars Seminar 21 May Final Examination Mode of Delivery Lectures Seminars Discussions Assessment Method and Weightage LO Method % Deadline All Seminar Presentation 15 See the schedule All Written Assignment 30 28 November All Personal Notes 15 4 December All End of Semester Exam 40 - Total 100 Seminar Presentation • A 15-minute presentation on the assigned topic. • Rubrics: Item Marks Depth 5 In-depth analysis of the legal issue: “breadth” and “depth” Structure 2 The writing has unity and coherence Originality 5 Explain original ideas and give source info for submissions Comprehensible Analysis 3 The legal analysis follows a logical flow of ideas TOTAL 15 Description Written Assignment • A full-fledged paper on the seminar topic. • Rubrics Item Marks Depth 7 In-depth analysis of the legal issue: “breadth” and “depth” Structure 5 The writing has unity and coherence Originality 10 Comprehensible Analysis TOTAL 8 30 Description Explain original ideas and give source info for submissions. To be checked via Turnitin The legal analysis follows a logical flow of ideas Personal Notes • A four-page summary of the reading materials (per topic) and class discussions for every class. • To be submitted in the 12th Week of the semester • Rubrics Item Marks Description Coverage 5 In-depth analysis of the legal issue: “breadth” and “depth” Structure 5 The writing has unity & coherence and the formatting is standardised Analysis 5 The legal analysis follows a logical flow of ideas. TOTAL 15 THANK YOU