INtroduction

advertisement

MGT 506 – Financial Fraud

Sham Related Party Transactions

DYNEGY

YVES BLECHNER

DAI NGUYEN

JIDE OLATEJU

Introduction

• Dynegy is an energy production, distribution and trading company.

• Energy products include natural gas, electricity, natural gas liquids, and coal.

• Distribution network is focused on North America

• Headquarters are in Houston, Texas (cf. Enron).

• NYSE Ticker Symbol: DYN

• Market Capitalization (as of Feb. 1, 2004): $1.69 BN

• Share Price (as of Feb. 1, 2004): $4.47

• Share Price as of April, 2002 (pre-fraud): approx. $30

FINANCIAL FRAUD SCHEME DYNEGY

Fraud Scheme…

• Gap between net income and cash flow from operations

• Causes of the gap:

- Recognition of net income in the form of unrealized gains from net forward positions

- Net forward positions generate no current cash flow

- This treatment of unrealized gains as net income was required under

"mark-to-market" accounting principles

• Dynegy wanted to plug the gap:

- Project Alpha: Creation of Special Purpose Entities (SPE’s) in April

2001

• The SPE’s are involved in a complex web of transactions (i.e. relatedparty transactions)

FINANCIAL FRAUD SCHEME DYNEGY

…Fraud Scheme

• First phase in fraud (duration: 9 months):

- SPE funded by loans from Citibank, Deutsche Bank, and CSFB

- SPE buys natural gas at market price

- SPE sells natural gas to Dynegy at a discount

- Dynegy sells natural gas at market price

• Second phase in fraud (expected duration: 51 months):

– SPE buys natural gas at market price

– SPE sells natural gas to Dynegy at a premium

– SPE repays creditors with funds from sale to Dynegy

• Result:

- 2001 cash flow from operations increased by $300 MM, or 37%, thus reducing the gap between net income and operating cash flow

- Dynegy obtained a $79 MM tax benefit

FINANCIAL FRAUD SCHEME DYNEGY

Fraud Committed

• Concealed financing cash flow as cash flow from operations

• Announced that funds from Project Alpha are for “risk management activities” rather than debt financing

• Lied about the true purpose of Project Alpha:

- Stated that the SPE was created to “secure a long-term natural gas supply”

- In reality: Project Alpha served to enhance Dynegy’s cash flow from operations and to obtain a tax benefit

• Overstated performance of energy trading activities by engaging in round-trip transactions:

- Buying and selling energy at pre-arranged buy & sell prices with the same counterparty (sham related-party transactions)

- Should have no economic effect, but the entities were not consolidated -> overstatement of performance

• Ignored auditors with respect to the classification of the SPE as a consolidated entity

FINANCIAL FRAUD SCHEME DYNEGY

Detection & Investigation

• The energy industry was under intense scrutiny due to the Enron scandal.

• Possible fraud relating to Project Alpha was first detected by a Wall

Street Journal article criticizing the transaction in April 2002.

• The newspaper article prompted the SEC to contact Dynegy and to begin an informal inquiry of Project Alpha and the company.

• SEC’s informal inquiry of Dynegy upgraded to a formal investigation in May 2002.

• The SEC filed an enforcement action against Dynegy in September

2002 based on findings of:

– Improper accounting for and misleading disclosures relating to Project

Alpha’s $300MM financing transaction.

– Overstatement of energy trading activity resulting from round-trip trades.

FINANCIAL FRAUD SCHEME DYNEGY

Resolution: The Company

• Dynegy paid a $3MM civil penalty to settle a SEC enforcement action related to Project Alpha in September 2002. As part of the settlement,

Dynegy:

– Agreed to cease and desist from violating anti-fraud provisions of securities laws.

– Neither admitted nor denied the SEC’s findings of: securities fraud resulting from the company’s improper accounting of Project Alpha and misleading statements about the true nature of the SPE and the firm’s round-trip energy trades.

• The company later restated its 2001 financial statements to correctly account for the $300MM as cash from financing rather than operations and erased the $79MM tax benefit achieved by Project Alpha.

FINANCIAL FRAUD SCHEME DYNEGY

Resolution: The Perpetrators

• A federal grand jury issued a criminal indictment of the three Dynegy employees involved in Project Alpha in June 2003 on charges of conspiracy, securities fraud, mail fraud and wire fraud.

– Gene Foster, CPA, VP of Taxation: Pleaded guilty in August 2003.

– Helen Sharkey, CPA, Manager-Accounting, Deal Structure: Pleaded guilty in August 2003.

– Jamie Olis, Sr. Director, Tax Planning: Found guilty by a federal jury in

November 2003.

• A civil suit filed by the SEC against the three Dynegy employees sought fines and “disgorgement of the defendants’ ill-gotten gains, which included bonuses and trading profits received during the period of their misconduct.”

FINANCIAL FRAUD SCHEME DYNEGY

Prevention

• Acknowledge the gap between cash flow from operations and net income and explain its causes (mark-to-market accounting principles in relation to net forward positions)

• Investigate legitimate ways of closing the gap (rather than a quick fix)

• Be open and honest with analysts and investing public

• Employees that are given stock and/or stock options as part of their compensation have particular incentives:

- Create a method to oversee the actions of such employees in executive roles more closely

• Create an independent internal audit department reporting to the board

Audit Committee

• Have the Audit Committee guarantee that management implements auditors’ recommendations.

FINANCIAL FRAUD SCHEME DYNEGY

Download