+ Industry and Competitive Situation Analysis Alex Raney Allen Hicks Anthony Brown Braden Walker Christian Grandorf + Background of Columbia Formed from a hat company into a sportswear company in 1938. Create innovative outdoor apparel Extremely popular international brand since the 1970’s Forbes Top 100 most trustworthy companies Apparel magazine Top 100 most innovative companies. + Background of Columbia http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pImbhMK7CIg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBgQpyxs6jQ + Industry Analysis Very competitive Seasonality Innovation and technology Global + Competition Rapid growth Hundreds of competitors Unique customer offerings + Seasonality Every company within the market faces seasonality Different product lines Strategy + Innovation and Technology Under Armour- Kevin Plank 1996 Unique for whatever outdoor activity + Global Distribution Risk Unique markets 2011 United States LAAP EMEA Canada Total 2010 2009 Net Sales $ 948.0 341.0 275.4 129.6 % of Sale s Net Sales 56.0 % $ 881.0 20.1 263.4 16.3 222.4 7.6 116.7 % of Sale s Net Sales 59.4 % $ 736.9 17.7 203.2 15.0 197.4 7.9 106.5 % of Sale s 59.2 % 16.3 15.9 8.6 $ 1,694.0 100.0 % $ 1,483.5 100.0 % $ 1,244.0 100.0 % + SWOT Analysis-Strengths Cost position is lower than competitors Product diversity Extent of distribution Continued growth year after year + SWOT Analysis-Weaknesses No corporate owned manufacturing Does not maintain long term contracts Quality control issues Affected by the unstable price of raw materials High cost of transportation + SWOT Analysis-Opportunities Expand the sales of their warm weather lines Expand the OMNI Tech use in products Continue to expand in the LAAP Region Grow their direct to consumer sales + SWOT Analysis-Threats Competitors expanding into their market Increased regulation in manufacturing countries Growing wages in manufacturing countries + Production Strategy Production is outsourced to foreign manufacturers Vietnam and China account for 70% of apparel production and 90% of footwear Over one hundred independent manufacturers Operates liaison offices in 7 countries, staffed by Columbia employees + Transportation Strategy Products are moved to their markets via ocean freight Finished cotton goods imported into the United States incur a 15.9% tariff + Distribution Strategy Products available in one hundred countries Net Sales United States LAAP EMEA Canada Total % of Sales 947 56.70% 277 22.60% 236.6 13.80% 114.7 6.90% 1,669.60 100% Uses a mix of independent distributors and direct to consumer sales + Financial Analysis Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) stock on the NYSE has increased from 57.07 to 83.25 in a Fifty Two week span (April 1, 2013 to April 1, 2014) Columbia went public sixteen years ago and has since then grown by 473% Currently valued at 2.83 billion dollars 34.6 million shares outstanding, 66% held by insiders Revenue of 1.68 billion Gross Profit of 743.66 million Cash Flow of 274.27 million Net Sales decreased 1% in 2013 + Market Placement Retail stores and outlets Event sponsorships Outfitting Olympic teams and competitors + + Under Armour Target customers: Athletes, now trying to expand into casual gear as well for the non-athletes Company Name Revenues Gross Net Income Margi n EBITDA Total Assets Total PE Market Employee Share Liabilities Ratio Cap s Price Under 2,332,051,000 48.74 162,330,000 312,226,000 1,577,741,000 524,387,000 68.16 8,775 M Armour Inc. Columbia 1,684,996,000 44.13 Sportswea r Co. 94,341,000 171,794,000 1,605,588,000 360,170,000 29.558 2,783 M 8 7,800 102.24 4,320 80.40 + The North Face North Face is expected to double VF Corporation’s revenue by 2015 to $3 billion a year. Target Customers: aimed at college students, switching to a more stylish apparel The North Face is apart of the VF Corporation which is the largest apparel company in the world. + Patagonia Patagonia reached $540 million in revenues in 2011 Target customers: geared toward eco-friendly buyers Patagonia focuses more on being green than any of its competitors and even makes most of its apparel of recycled materials. + Key Success Factor/ Competitive Variable Weight Columbia Under Armour North Face Patagonia Quality/product performance .20 10 9 10 8 Reputation/image .10 9 9 10 9 Raw material access/cost .10 8 8 7 3 Technological skills .10 10 8 7 7 Manufacturing capability .15 10 10 9 10 Marketing/distribution .20 7 9 5 4 Financial strength .10 8 9 10 7 Relative cost position .05 7 7 6 6 Overall strength rating 1.00 8.75 8.85 8.05 6.8