2015
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF LAW
Trial and Advocacy Program
Negotiation and Dispute Resolution Program
Lawyering Skills Competitions
1
Washington University School of Law
Trial and Advocacy Program
Trial and Advocacy Program
Moot Court
Supreme
Court
Environmental
International
Intellectual
Property (IP)
Trial
Advocacy
ADR Program
National
Environmental
Moot Court
Jessup
International
Saul Lefkowitz
(Trademark
Law)
Trial Team
Negotiation
International
Criminal Court
Giles
Sutherland Rich
(Patent Law)
Inter-School
National
Appellate
Advocacy
National
Civil Rights
Mediation
Intra-School *
Wiley Rutledge
International
Student Trial
Advocacy
1L Client
Counseling
1L Negotiation
2
* WULAW’s intra-school competitions (Wiley Rutledge Moot Court, Environmental Law Moot Court,
Client Counseling and Negotiation) are administered by student run boards.
Washington University School of Law
Trial and Advocacy Program
Intra-School Moot Court Competitions
Wiley Rutledge Moot Court Competition
3
Washington University School of Law
Trial and Advocacy Program
Wiley Rutledge Moot Court Competition
Description:
The oldest and largest moot court at the School of Law, The
Wiley Rutledge Moot Court Competition began at the law
school in 1867. It is named in honor of Justice Wiley B.
Rutledge of the U.S. Supreme Court, a former dean of the
law school. This competition, open to all second and third
year law students during the Fall semester, focuses on federal
law.
Prior to the competition, students learn effective brief
writing and oral advocacy skills through seminars led by
faculty.
For the competition, students work in teams, with each team
ultimately writing a brief and delivering appellate arguments
before panels of lawyers and judges. Judges for the final
round are usually federal judges from various circuits in the
country.
Number of Students:
Up to 96 students participate each year, in teams of two.
Team Selection:
Students select their partner. In order to participate in the
Wiley Rutledge Moot Court competition, students must
register for the competition in the spring.
4
Recommended Preparation:
Appellate brief writing skills, past experience with advocacy
or public speaking.
Practice Schedule:
Up to each team.
Competition Schedule:
Two preliminary rounds take place in November. Three
other rounds take place after preliminaries.
Credits Earned:
1 credit, posted in the Fall.
Skills Developed:
Oral and written advocacy, research, editing. The team
researches two legal issues and writes one 30 page brief of
passable quality.
Honors:
In 2007, John R. Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States
Supreme Court, judged the competition’s final round.
Contacts:
Richard Finneran, refinneran@wulaw.wustl.edu
Washington University School of Law
Trial and Advocacy Program
Inter-School Moot Court Teams
National Appellate Advocacy Moot Court Team
National Civil Rights Moot Court Team
National Environmental Moot Court Team
Phillip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Team
International Criminal Court Moot Court Team
Giles Sutherland Rich Memorial IP Moot Court Competition
Saul Lefkowitz National Trademark Law Moot Court Team
5
Washington University School of Law
Trial and Advocacy Program
National Appellate Advocacy Moot Court
Team
http://www.abanet.org/lsd/competitions/naac/
Description:
The National Appellate Advocacy Moot Court team
represents the law school at the American Bar Association
(ABA) National Appellate Advocacy Competition, which
simulates an argument before the United States Supreme
Court. Each team writes a brief on behalf of the Petitioner
or Respondent and represents both the Petitioner and
Respondent at oral argument.
Number of Students:
6. There are two teams of 3 students (1 alternate).
Team Selection:
Applications are due during the first week of school in the
Fall semester. Tryouts are scheduled in early September . The
team is selected by a panel, including the coaches, annually
through an audition process early in the Fall semester that is
open to second and third year students.
Recommended Preparation:
Performance in the Wiley Rutledge Moot Court
Competition, grades, writing skills, journal membership, past
experience with advocacy or public speaking.
Practice Schedule:
Brief writing occurs over winter break and continues into the
first week of January classes. Oral argument practices follow,
typically 90 minutes at a time, 2-3 times a week.
6
Competition Schedule:
The team attends one regional competition, which will occur
at the end of February or early March. If a sub-team is
successful in winning the regional round, they will attend
nationals, which occurs near the end of March or beginning
of April, in Chicago.
Credits Earned:
1 credit, posted in the Spring.
Skills Developed:
Oral and written advocacy, research, editing. The team
researches two legal issues and writes one 30 page brief.
Honors:
The National Moot Court team won the ABA National
Championship in 2012. In the preceding five years, it had
advanced five teams to the national quarter-final round, a
feat matched by no other team in the country. The team has
qualified for the NAAC finals every year since 2006. In 2012,
its students received recognition as the second and third best
speakers over all in the national finals. In 2013, it received
recognition for having the best speaker and best brief in the
St. Louis regional competition. In 2014, it advanced to the
final and semi-final rounds as well as won best overall brief
in the regional competition.
Contacts:
Richard Finneran, refinneran@wulaw.wustl.edu
Washington University School of Law
Trial and Advocacy Program
National Civil Rights Moot Court Team
http://local.law.umn.edu/mootcourt/index.htm
Description:
The National Moot Court team represents the law school at
the William E. McGee National Civil Rights Moot Court
Competition, which simulates an argument before the United
States Supreme Court on an actual case on certiorari. Each
team writes a brief on behalf of the Petitioner or
Respondent and represents both the Petitioner and
Respondent at oral argument.
Number of Students:
6. There are two sub-teams of 3 students.
Team Selection:
Same application process as the National Moot Court Team
(see pg. 10). Applications are due during the first week of
school in the Fall semester. Tryouts are scheduled in early
September. The team is selected by a panel, including the
coaches, annually through an audition process early in the
Fall semester that is open to second and third year students.
Recommended Preparation:
Performance in Wiley Rutledge Competition, grades, writing
skills, journal membership, past experience with advocacy or
public speaking. An interest in civil rights law is not a
requisite, but a plus.
Competition Schedule:
The team attends the McGee National Civil Rights Moot Court
Competition, hosted by the University of Minnesota School of
Law. The competition takes place in late February/early March.
Credits Earned:
1 credit, posted in the Spring.
Skills Developed:
Oral and written advocacy, research, editing. The team
researches three legal issues and writes one 35 page brief.
Honors:
The National Moot Court team won the McGee Civil Rights
Moot Court Competition in three consecutive years (2009
through 2011). A member of the team received top speaker
honors in each of those years. The team placed second in 2013,
and was the only school to advance two teams to the final eight.
In 2014, the team advanced to the quarter-finals in the McGee
Civil Rights Moot Court Competition.
Contacts:
Kelly Snyder, kelysnyder@gmail.com
John Kershman, john@strangelawfirm.com
Practice Schedule:
Brief writing occurs over winter break and continues into the
first week of January classes. Oral argument practices follow,
typically 90 minutes at a time, 2-3 times a week.
7
Washington University School of Law
Trial and Advocacy Program
National Environmental Moot Court Team
http://www.law.pace.edu/environmentalm/
Description:
Recognized as the preeminent environmental law moot court
in the United States, this annual competition tests skills in
appellate brief writing and oral advocacy involving issues
drawn from real cases, providing experience in
environmental litigation first hand. The competition is
distinctive in that three teams argue the issues, reflecting the
fact that environmental litigation frequently involves multiple
parties.
Number of Students:
2.
Team Selection:
The team is usually comprised of the winners of the school’s
Intramural Environmental Moot Court competition. When
the winners of the intramural competition are graduating
students, however, tryouts may be held.
Recommended Preparation:
Success in the law school’s intramural Environmental Moot
Court competition is of great importance.
Competition Schedule:
The competition is held annually during late February at Pace
University in New York.
Credits Earned:
1 credit, posted in the Spring.
Skills Developed:
Oral advocacy, legal research and brief writing skills.
Participants gain experience working with statutory language
and environmental regulations.
Honors:
In 2006, WULAW finished second in the nation, and in 2007,
WULAW advanced to the semi-final round and won the
David Sive award for best overall brief. In 2008, WULAW
advanced to the semi-final round and won the best advocate
award in the all three preliminary rounds. In 2009. WULAW
advanced to the quarter-final round. In 2011, WULAW
advanced to the semi-final round.
Contacts:
Andrew Simonson, andrew.simonson@usdoj.gov
Practice Schedule:
The brief is written late in the Fall, and the competition
itself takes place in late February. The team practices 2-3
times per week in the month preceding the competition.
8
Washington University School of Law
Trial and Advocacy Program
Phillip C. Jessup International Law Moot
Court Team
http://www.ilsa.org/jessup/
Description:
The Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition is the
largest moot court competition in the world. Nearly 600 law
schools representing over 100 countries participate each year.
Written and oral arguments are presented to a simulated
International Court of Justice, the UN body which hears disputes
between sovereign states.
Number of Students:
5 members. The entire team works on the two Memorials (briefs)
together. For oral arguments, individuals are paired.
Team Selection:
Tryouts and call back interviews are scheduled in early September.
Selection is based on an oral argument, application, resume,
writing sample and interview.
Recommended Preparation:
Background in international law, past oral advocacy, and legal
writing experience.
Practice Schedule:
Fall – one two-hour meetings per week plus extra meetings as
needed . Spring – students return before classes begin to finish
the Memorials. During the spring semester, the team practices
four to five times per week.
Competition Schedule:
Jessup Super-Regional rounds are held on one of the last three
weekends in February. International rounds are held during the
last week of March or the first week of April in Washington, DC
(the top two teams from each Super-Regional round advance).
9
Credits Earned:
2 credits, 1 posted per semester. New team members must enroll
in International Courts & Tribunals, taught in the fall by Coach
Gilbert Sison. Team members must also take a course in
international law as a co- or pre- requisite.
Skills Developed:
Oral and written advocacy, legal research, editing. The team
researches 4 international legal issues, writes two 40-page briefs
and presents 45 minutes of oral argument at each round.
Honors:
In 2008, the school won its Regional Competition, placed third in
the world at the International Rounds, and won the Alona M.
Evans Award for best written submissions in the world. In 2009,
in addition to winning the Midwest Super-Regional, WULAW won
the award for best oralist, and placed 19th at the International
Rounds. In 2010, WULAW advanced to semifinal rounds of the
Southwest Super-Regional and won seconds best oralist. In 2011,
WULAW won the award for Best Written Memorial. In 2012,
WULAW advanced to the quarter-final round of the Rocky
Mountain Super-Regional. In 2013, WULAW won the South
Super-Regional Championship and Third Place Memorial Award.
In 2014, the school won its regional competition, advancing to the
World Cup International Rounds, where the team placed quarterfinalists and won best memorial. In 2015, the school won its
super-regional competition, advancing to the World Cup
International Rounds, where the team won the Championship.
Contacts:
Gilbert Sison, gsison@rsrglaw.com
Leila Sadat, sadat@wulaw.wustl.edu
Washington University School of Law
Trial and Advocacy Program
International Criminal Court Moot Court
Team
http://law.pace.edu/icc
Description:
The annual International Criminal Court (ICC) Moot Competition
held at Pace University School of Law is now the official English
language round for the ICC Trial Competition held in The Hague.
The new global competition is sponsored by the Dutch
government, in cooperation with Pace Law School, the University
of Amsterdam, the American Society of International Law, and
the International Criminal Law Network (ICLN).
Each team will submit three short memorials (briefs) requiring the
students to research and develop arguments based on the three
participants in ICC prosecutions, i.e., the Prosecution, the Defense
and the Victims’ Advocates, a new role developed for the first
time for the International Criminal Court. These memorials will be
evaluated by legal scholars, and prizes will be awarded for best
brief, second place runner-up, and third place runner-up in each of
the three categories of memorials.
Number of Students:
4 team members
Competition Schedule:
International Criminal Court Moot Court rounds are held during
beginning to mid March. International rounds of the competition
are held during mid to late April in The Hague.
Credits Earned:
2 credits, 1 posted per semester. New team members must enroll
in International Courts & Tribunals, taught in the fall by Coach
Gilbert Sison. Team members must also take a course in
international law as a co- or pre- requisite.
Skills Developed:
Oral advocacy, patent law research skills, editing and appellate
brief writing.
Honors:
First year of participation in this competition
Contacts:
Michael Koby, koby@wulaw.wustl.edu
Team Selection:
Tryouts and call back interviews are scheduled in early September.
Selection is based on an oral argument, application, resume,
writing sample and interview.
Recommended Preparation:
Background in international law, past oral advocacy, and legal
writing experience.
Practice Schedule:
Fall – one two-hour meetings per week plus extra meetings as
needed . Spring – students return before classes begin to finish
the Memorials. During the spring semester, the team practices
four to five times per week.
10
Washington University School of Law
Trial and Advocacy Program
Giles Sutherland Rich Memorial Intellectual
Property Moot Court Team
http://www.aipla.org/
Description:
Students interested in intellectual property law have the
opportunity to participate in the Giles Sutherland Rich Moot
Court competition, sponsored by the American Intellectual
Property Law Association, which primarily focuses on issues
in patent law.
Number of Students:
4 total. 2 teams of 2 students.
Team Selection:
Tryouts are scheduled to be held in the Fall. Tryouts consist
of a 15-minute oral argument before a panel of judges A
brief of the relevant issues is provided.
Recommended Preparation:
Background and/or interest in IP law, past oral advocacy and
legal writing experience.
Practice Schedule:
Brief writing occurs over winter break and the first two
weeks of the semester. Oral argument practices occur twice
weekly, for approximately 1-2 hours per session. Generally,
practices take place Tuesday and Thursday nights from 8-10
PM for the first 2 months of the spring semester.
11
Competition Schedule:
Regional competition is held over either the first or second
weekend of spring break in Chicago, Houston, or Boston.
The top two regional teams advance to nationals, held
approximately the third weekend in April.
Credits Earned:
2 credits, posted in the Spring. It is suggested that team
members take the course “Intellectual Property Litigation” in
the spring semester in which students write a brief as part of
the curriculum, using the actual Giles Rich moot court
problem.
Skills Developed:
Oral advocacy, patent law research skills, editing and
appellate brief writing.
Honors:
In 2007, 2009, 2010, and 2011 WULAW advanced to the
regional semi-final round. In 2008, WULAW won the Best
Appellee Brief Award for the Northeast Region.
Contacts:
David Deal, drdeal@wulaw.wustl.edu.
Washington University School of Law
Trial and Advocacy Program
Saul Lefkowitz National Trademark Law Moot
Court Team
http://www.inta.org/
Description:
The Saul Lefkowitz Moot Court Competition is sponsored
by the International Trademark Association (INTA) and
centers around issues arising in US trademark and unfair
competition law. Students write a brief and argue the case
before a panel of volunteer attorneys and jurists from the
Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit and the Trademark
Trial & Appeal Board of the USPTO, as well as judges from
various districts and other courts.
Number of Students:
4-8 total. 2 teams of up to 4 students.
Team Selection:
Tryouts are scheduled to be held in the Fall. Students are
given a tryout packet and must prepare a 10-minute oral
argument.
Recommended Preparation:
Past oral advocacy and legal writing experience. Background
and/or interest in trademark and IP law is helpful but not
required.
Competition Schedule:
Regionals are held in Atlanta, Chicago, New York and San
Francisco in mid/late February. The winning team from each
region will advance to the National Finals held in
Washington, DC during late March.
Credits Earned:
2 credits, posted in the Spring.
Skills Developed:
Oral advocacy, patent law research skills, editing and
appellate brief writing.
Honors:
In 2008, WULAW won the Dolores K. Hanna National Best
Brief Award. Moreover, WULAW placed second overall and
won the best brief at the Midwest Regional Competition. In
2009, WULAW won 3rd Place and Best Brief at the regional
competition
Contacts:
David Deal, drdeal@wulaw.wustl.edu.
Practice Schedule:
Set by team members. Brief writing is completed over
winter break.
12
Washington University School of Law
Trial and Advocacy Program
Trial Competitions
National Trial Team
13
Washington University School of Law
Trial and Advocacy Program
National Trial Team
Description:
Each year, the Trial Team competes in four national trial
competitions.
Through participating in these competitions, students 1) learn how
to analyze case files, 2) argue pretrial motions, 3) construct a
theory of the case that frames their opening statements, 4)
conduct direct and cross examinations, 5) examine expert
witnesses, 6) use demonstrative evidence and introduce exhibits,
and 7) make closing arguments.
Number of Students:
12-14.
Team Selection:
Tryouts for the 2015-16 Trial Team are scheduled to be held in
mid-April 2015 and again in early May 2015.
Recommended Preparation:
Review trial advocacy material in reserve in the library.
Practice Schedule:
To be determined based on student schedules. Generally, teams
practice two evenings a week and on both Saturday and Sunday.
Former National Trial Competition Champion, Judge David
Mason, serves as head coach of the Trial Team.
Competition Schedule:
In the fall, 4 team members compete in the National Institute of
Trial Advocacy (NITA) Tournament of Champions, and 4 team
members compete in the National Civil Trial Competition NCTC.
In the spring, 4 team members compete in the National Trial
Competition (NTC) and 8 team members compete in the
American Association of Justice Student Trial Advocacy (AAJ
STAC) Competition.
14
Credits Earned:
2 credits, both posted in the Spring.
Skills Developed:
Fundamental trial advocacy skills.
Honors:
In 2011, WULAW advanced to semi-finalists at the AAJ STAC
Regionals and won 1st and 2nd Place at the Missouri Attorney
General’s Competition. We also won the NTC Regionals. In 2012
and 2013, WULAW won the regional competition of the NTC,
advancing to the National Championship of the NTC. We also
won the regional competition of the AAJ STAC, advancing to the
National Championship of the AAJ STAC and won 1st Place at
the Missouri Attorney General’s Competition. In 2013, WULAW
won the NITA Tournament of Champions and the Missouri
Attorney General’s Cup Trial Advocacy Competition. In addition,
we won the regional championship of the ABA Labor &
Employment Law Trial Advocacy Competition, advancing to the
national competition, where they won the National
Championship. In 2014, WULAW won the regional competition
of the NTC, advancing to the National Championship. We won
the regional competition of the AAJ STAC, advancing to the
National Championship, where the team advanced to the semifinal round. In 2015, the team won the regional championship,
advancing to the Nationals, where they placed as finalists.
Contacts:
Judge David Mason, david.mason@courts.mo.gov
Mark Rudder, mrudder@markrudderlaw.com
Washington University School of Law
Trial and Advocacy Program
ADR Program Competitions
Overview
ABA Client Counseling Competition
ABA Negotiation Competition
ABA Representation in Mediation Competition
15
Washington University School of Law
Trial and Advocacy Program
Overview of Negotiation and Dispute
Resolution Program Sponsored Competitions
Client Counseling
Negotiation
Mediation
Law office
consultation in which
students, acting as
attorneys, conduct an
interview with a
person playing the
role of the client and
then explain how they
would proceed
further.
Law students
negotiate a series of
legal problems. The
simulations consist of
a common set of facts
known by all
participants and
confidential
information known
only to one side.
Law students role-play
as advocates and
clients in a mediation
setting, provides
students a valuable
opportunity to
experience the
mediation process.
Fall for 1L.
Fall for 2L and 3L,
Spring for 1L.*
November
for 2L and 3L
Inter-School
Competition
November
Late Feb/
Early March.
Inter-School
Team
Requirements
Tryouts.
Tryouts.
Description
Intra-School
Competition
16
*There are separate 1L and upper-class (2L/3L) divisions for the competition.
Washington University School of Law
Trial and Advocacy Program
ABA Client Counseling Competition
http://www.abanet.org/lsd/competitions/clientcounseling/
Description:
The Client Counseling Competition simulates a law office
consultation in which students, acting as attorneys, conduct
an initial interview with a person playing the role of the
client. The students explain various aspects of the attorneyclient relationship and explore various legal and factual
elements of the client’s case. Afterward, the students meet
to evaluate the interview and to plan the next steps in their
representation of their new client.
Schedule:
The intra-school competition is held in the Fall semester for 1Ls.
Competition Schedule:
The intra-school competition for 1Ls is in the Fall semester.
Credits Earned:
0.
Skills Developed:
Client counseling, professional responsibility, issue
identification, legal and factual research, self-analysis, and
teamwork.
Contacts:
1L Competition
Ann Shields, davis@wustl.edu
Recommended Preparation:
Background in client representation is helpful, including
issue identification and developing rapport with clients.
Practice Schedule:
Intra-school competition 1Ls: 2 -3 hours preparation with
teammate per round.
Benefit:
First-year students have opportunity to engage in hands-on
learning of a fundamental lawyering skill (and gain an
accomplishment for resume!).
17
Washington University School of Law
Trial and Advocacy Program
ABA Negotiation Competition
http://www.abanet.org/lsd/competitions/negotiation/
Description:
The Negotiation Competition simulates legal negotiations in which
law students, acting as lawyers, negotiate a series of legal and
factual problems against another team of students. The
simulations consist of a common set of facts known by all
participants and confidential information known only to the
participants representing a particular side. All of the simulations
deal with the same general area of the law, but the negotiation
situation varies with each round and level of the competition.
Number of Students:
10 total. Two teams of 2 students and 6 alternates.
Competition Schedule:
Intra-school competition - 1Ls - Spring semester. Intra-school tryouts 2L and 3L - September. Inter-school team - Regional competitions
are held in November. Winners of the 10 regional competitions
advance to Nationals, which takes place in the spring. If the team
wins Nationals, they advance to Internationals in the summer.
Credits Earned:
0 for 1Ls; 1 for 2L & 3Ls
Skills Developed:
Negotiation planning and strategy, issue identification, problemsolving, legal and factual research, option generation, oral
advocacy, client representation, self-analysis, and teamwork.
Team Selection:
There is an intra-school competition in the Spring semester for 1Ls.
For 2L and 3L students, tryouts are held by team coaches in
September for the Regional Team.
Honors:
In 2004, WULAW won 1st place in the Regional Competition and
were finalists in the National Competition. In 2009, WULAW
reached the semi-finals in the Regional Competition.
Recommended Preparation:
Background in ADR, negotiation, oral advocacy and client
representation.
Contacts:
1L Competition
Ann Shields, davis@wustl.edu
Practice Schedule:
Intra-school competition 1Ls: 2-3 hours preparation with teammate
per round.
2L and 3L Competition
Karen Tokarz, tokarz@wulaw.wustl.edu
Mike Geigerman, mgeigerman@usam-midwest.com
Inter-school team 2Ls/3Ls: After selection, practice begins
immediately and consists of two 3-hour meetings during the week
and one on the weekend. Additional meetings scheduled the week
before competition. Team members may meet individually, as
needed.
18
Washington University School of Law
Trial and Advocacy Program
ABA Representation in Mediation
Competition
http://www.abanet.org/dispute/mediationcomp.html
Description:
In the Representation in Mediation Competition, students play the
roles of attorney and client in a mediation setting. Students are
evaluated on their preparation for and representation of a client in
mediation. This competition provides students a valuable
opportunity to experience client representation in the mediation
process and to learn to work with mediators.
Number of Students:
10 total. 2 teams of 2 students and 6 alternates.
Team Selection:
There is only a 2L and 3L intra-school competition. Try-outs take
place in November. In preparation, the students are asked to
analyze a role play and to draft a one-page representation plan. In
the tryout, they are asked to present a 10-minute opening
statement to the mediator and to respond to questions. The team
coaches select the team members based on their try-out
performance, representation plan and background in ADR.
Recommended Preparation:
Background in ADR, negotiation, mediation, oral advocacy, and
client representation.
Practice Schedule:
After selection, there are team orientation meetings at end of Fall
semester. Beginning in January, practice is 3 meetings per week two 3-hour meetings on weekdays and one meeting on the
weekend. Additional meetings are scheduled the week before the
competition. Teams meet individually, as needed.
19
Competition Schedule:
Regional competitions are held in late February/early March.
Winners of the 10 regional competitions advance to the National
Competition held in April.
Competition Board:
Wash. U. hosted the regional competition in 2006, 2008 and 2010.
A student board is selected when Wash U. is the regional host.
Credits Earned:
1
Skills Developed:
Oral advocacy skills in mediation and negotiation, including issue
identification, problem solving, and legal research. Each team
researches legal and factual issues, brainstorms possible options,
writes mediation representation plans, creates exhibits and
participates in 75-minute mediation sessions, which include team
self-analysis. Teamwork and client representation are emphasized.
Honors:
Teams advanced to the final round at the regional competition in
2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013, taking 1st
place at Regionals and proceeding to the National Competition in
all but 2010 and 2013. Wash U. placed 5th in the nation in 2005,
3rd in 2006, 7th in 2007, 2nd in 2009 and 3rd in 2011. The team
won the regional championship, advancing to the Nationals where
they placed quarter-finalists.
Contacts:
Karen Tokarz, tokarz@wulaw.wustl.edu
Mike Geigerman, mgeigerman@usam-midwest.com
Washington University School of Law
Trial and Advocacy Program