Intellectual Property LPAB Winter Session 2012 Therese Catanzariti Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 industrial revolution Fabric design Manchester mills – linen, muslin, cotton, calico THEN any ornamentation on products THEN any visual features of products 1906 Designs Act 2003 Designs Act Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 easy to manufacture easy to use – “out of box readiness” ergonomically sound Good design is obvious. Great design is transparent Everything is designed. Few things are designed well. The design process, at its best, integrates the aspirations of art, science, and culture. I don't design clothes, I design dreams - Ralph Lauren Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 Appearance of product / visual features NOT function / performance (patent law) NOT method of construction NOT product itself – separate and distinct from product In relation to product Microsoft Type Font – type font design not specify tangible thing Re Comshare Inc –computer screen display not product as ephemeral separate from computer screen Monopoly – does not require copying Term – maximum 10 years from filing date (5+ optional 5) – s46 Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 "design" , in relation to a product, means the overall appearance of the product resulting from one or more visual features of the product – s5 Re Wolanski (necktie support) –monopoly for on particular individual and specific appearance “Visual feature” in relation to a product, includes the shape, configuration, pattern and ornamentation of the product –s7 Covers 3D (shape of box) and 2D (patterns) product – thing that is handmade or manufactured – s6 Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 registrable design if new and distinctive Prior art base – s15(2) compared with prior art base for the design as it existed before the priority date – s15 ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Designs registered Designs publicly used within Australia Published anywhere NOT published without owner’s consent – s17(2) NOT artistic work not industrially applied – s18 NOT prescribed by regulations – s17(1) Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 new - new unless it is identical to a design that forms part of the prior art base for the design – s16(1) distinctive unless it is substantially similar in overall impression to a design that forms part of the prior art base – s16(2) Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 more weight to similarities than differences – s19(1) “informed user” – standard of person familiar with product - s19(4) Review 2 v Redberry – familiarity with fashion trends, not necessarily fashion designer factors – s19(2) ◦ State of development of prior art base ◦ Whether statement of newness and distinctiveness identifying visual features as new and distinctive ◦ If only part, amount, quality and importance of that part in the context of the design as a whole; and ◦ regard to freedom of creator to innovate Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 combination dual lens rear lights for motor vehicles absence of visible screws different visual features of the rear or base views cut out or recess at end of lamp the sloping, rounded mounting brackets surrounding the lenses Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 Designer – person who created design Employer if created in course of employment Person who commissioned under contract Assignee Legal personal representative Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 owner entitled to register – s13 May file File ◦ Common design for number of products – s22 ◦ Multiple designs for one product – s22 ◦ 5 copies of each representation of each design – s21 design must be reasonably clear and succinct - appear with reasonable clarity and without requiring unreasonably prolonged or complicated series of deductions from registration – Keller v LED ◦ (optional) statement of newness – s69 May be taken into account for infringement – s19 No pre-registration examination ◦ IP Australia only checks formalities – s39, 40 ◦ IP Australia only examine post grant, on request – s63 ◦ need examine before bring proceedings – s73 Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 Applicant may elect publication or registration – s35 Publication not stop infringement BUT stop other registration - part of prior art base Useful if large number of designs similar to honest concurrent user May withdraw registration and request publish only – s38 Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 to make or offer to make a product which embodies the design; to import such a product into Australia for sale, or for use for the purposes of any trade or business; to sell, hire or otherwise dispose of, or offer to sell, hire or otherwise dispose of, such a product; to use such a product in any way for the purposes of any trade or business; to keep such a product for the purpose of such sale, hire or use to authorise another person to do such things Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 makes or offers to make a product, in relation to which the design is registered, which embodies a design that is identical to, or substantially similar in overall impression to, the registered design; imports such a product into Australia for sale, or for use for the purposes of any trade or business; sells, hires or otherwise disposes of, or offers to sell, hire or otherwise dispose of, such a product; uses such a product in any way for the purposes of any trade or business; keeps such a product for the purpose of sale, hire, disposal or use Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 Owner can commence proceedings – s73 NOT exclusive licensee 1906 “fraudulent or obvious imitation” 2003 – identical or substantially similar in overall impression more weight to similarities than differences Foggin v Lacey (Orgasmatron) – compare to design not to product Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 Person use or authorise use of product with registered design Product is component part of complex product Use for purpose of repair of complex product to restore its overall appearance in whole or part Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 Injunction Damages Account of profits Additional damages – s75(3) Court may not award damages or account of profits or reduce damages if – s75(2) ◦ not aware design registered AND taken reasonable steps to ascertain if registered Prima facie registered defendant aware if product or packaging say registered design – s75(4) Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 Copyright term life+70 years copyright in artistic work include right to reproduce => Copyright rights include creating products limit copyright protection for essentially industrial products Part III, Division 8, Copyright Act Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 “corresponding design” - visual features of shape or configuration which, when embodied in a product, result in a reproduction of that work – s74 embodied - woven into, impressed on or worked into the product Polo v Ziliano Holdings – Ralph Lauren polo logo not embody design, as embody needed to give a material or discernible form to abstract principle Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12 Not infringe copyright in artistic work to reproduce work by embodying work or corresponding design in product ◦ If corresponding design registered– s75 ◦ If corresponding design unregistered but ◦ applied industrially to products Regulations – more than 50 units Press Form v Henderson –may be less than 50 if complex articles AND products sold, let for hire or offered or exposed for sale or hire – s77 Exception for works of artistic craftsmanship Sheldon v Metrokane – bottle opener Burge v Swarbrick – boat plug and mouldings Therese Catanzariti 5/28/12