Public Expenditure and Financial Management Overview of Issues and Approaches Bill Dorotinsky, PREM public sector governance group PEAM Course May 2, 2006 Outline Framework for Review Approaches to PEM review Budget Cycle Formulation Execution PFM System PFM Functions Outcomes/Impact Common Problems Common Solutions Measuring PFM Systems 2 Framework Three Objectives of Public Expenditure Management Systems Macrofiscal discipline and stability Support economic growth and stability (and reduce poverty) Avoid public finance crises Strategic allocation of resources Match government policy with programs, objectives And assure social safety nets, and promote growth Technical efficiency Getting the most from each zloty spent 3 Framework Basic principles of PEM Comprehensiveness Accuracy cover a defined period of time (e.g. one year budget, multi-year forecasts) Authoritativeness record actual transactions and flows Annuality include all revenue and expenditure, all agencies only spend as authorized by law Transparency information on spending is public, timely, understandable 4 What institutions to review? Formal and Informal Rules Laws and regulations Process Constitutions , fiscal, budget, procurement, civil service, special funds, sector laws, public enterprises, mandatory spending Policy Planning Financial/resource management Organizations and their roles Information 5 Approaches to PEM Review Cycle, Process System broad scope organizations Functions/tasks Outcomes/Impact 6 Expenditure Management Cycle Financial management system boundaries Planning system Project appraisal Medium term plans, e.g. three year rolling plans Resource allocation Annual budgets Development, recurrent and revenue Expenditure review Public expenditure review Institutions Fund release procedure, e.g... warranting Accountability Audit system Reports and financial statements Accounting for revenue and expenditure Source: Adapted from Integrated Financial Management. Michael Parry, International Management Consultants Limited. Training Workshop on Government Budgeting in Developing Countries. THE UNITED NATIONS. December 1997. 7 Budget Formulation Issues are typically about Process Quality of Engagement 8 Process Issues “Due process” Fair hearing for proposals, requests within government Coherence Budget process is planning process Planning within resource constraints Indicative ceilings for budget offered early in the process ‘hard budget constraint’ Comprehensiveness Changing incentives Capital, all revenues and expenses Civil society participation ‘decentralized’ impact analysis Legislative stage 9 Process (continued) Proper decision sequence for coherent process Macrofiscal, revenues, expenditures Sectoral Administrative/program/project Accountability: Link resources with management responsibility Schedule Budget calendar issued Sufficient time for sound proposals Ministries Budget office analysis Legislative review Two stage process 10 Quality Issues (improving process outcome) Multi-year perspective Setting multi-year policy objectives Conservative economic, revenue forecast Likely versus ‘hoped for’ Benchmarked against non-governmental forecasts Realistic expenditure forecast Provision for recurring ‘unanticipated’ events Contingency reserves – with clear rules for use Indicative ceilings linked to second-year of prior budget forecast (policy) Requests reconciled to prior year actuals, current year estimates Two aggregate forecasts (advanced) Proposed policy Current services/policy 11 Quality (continued) Budget ownership Early, frequent engagement of policy officials on structured decisions Fiscal policy paper to kick-off process Distinguish policy from recurrent revenue Proposed revenue sources versus historical trends No spending allowed against proposed unless they materialize (grants, tax revenue) Communication Clear signals of direction, markets and agencies Prepare public for change – sustainable 12 Quality (continued) Budget Information Prior year actual, current year estimate, budget year +2, Staffing, Outputs Classification: economic, administrative, functional, program Requests distinguish between on-going, new spending; mandatory, discretionary Decision papers Basis for Minister of Finance, Gov’t decision Pulls together academic, audit, performance, evaluation of prior years financial performance, other information 13 Why is budget execution important? Credibility of the Honduran Budget – In-year Deviations by Agency (percent of the executed over the approved budget) 14 What is budget execution? Processes and institutions to implement the budget Incentives – principle-agent problem Reflects that budget is NOT only an accounting document also a political document Planning/steering device 15 Objectives of budget execution Manage Spending and Revenues to budget support choices of elected officials allow budget to be planning and steering tool promote macrofiscal discipline Reduce opportunities for corruption Enable program implementation Assure resources flow to programs allow budget to be aid to operational efficiency through spending unit advance planning, efficient administration enable program managers to achieve objective 16 General Phases of Execution Phase 1: Allocation Phase 2: Ministry Spending Plans link actions with finances; cash flow needs Phase 3: Commitments Phase 4: Verification Phase 5: Liquidation of Financial Obligation 17 Phases of Execution Time Medium term financial plan Annual budget Supplementary budgets Financial planning and budget system Budget transfers (virements) Expenditure warranted Fund control system Purchase order issued Invoice from supplier Commitment accounting Accrual accounting Source: Integrated Financial Management. Michael Parry, International Management Consultants Limited. Training Workshop on Government Budgeting in Developing Countries. THE UNITED NATIONS. December 1997. Payment Cash accounting 18 System Budget and Policy Execution System in Hungary (1999) 19 Public Finance Functions Core Functions Macroeconomic Forecasting Debt Management Fiscal Policy Revenue Administration Non-core Functions Budget Formulation Treasury Internal Audit Financial Asset Management Financial Investigations Procurement Administration Budget Execution Procurement Policy Lottery & Gambling Financial Market Regulation 20 Core Tasks and Organizations - Budget Allocations - Supplemental Budgets - Virements - In-year monitoring and correction - Warrants (cash allocations) - Cash Flow Management (forecasting, planning, sequestration) - debt management - financial asset management - accounting (policy, system management, chart of accounts) - make payments - collect revenues - account management and reconciliation - Central Bank relations Ministry of Finance - Macroforecasting - Fiscal Policy - Revenue administration - Debt Management Treasury Spending Ministry Spending Unit - internal control - program management - spending (commitments) - recording & reporting - payment orders - verification of receipt of goods/services - program/cash plans Financial Management is Everyone’s Responsibility 21 Common PEM problems Weak links between planning, policy, resource limits, and budgets Annual focus leads to suboptimal choices Using other means to support favored programs Revenues not captured in budget Taking piecemeal decisions without reference to over-all effect Funds don’t reach intended beneficiaries Lower than expected returns to capital Non-comprehensive budget Digging a hole; inability to climb out Complacency today, unaware of crisis tomorrow Separation between capital and recurrent budgets failure to achieve strategic objectives abstract planning, unrelated to ways and means Budget executed differently than approved Goods and services not delivered as planned 22 Common Reforms MTEF Treasury Performance Budgeting ‘Fragmentation’ IFMIS Procurement, Debt New Public Management Deconcentration, decentralization Administrative & Civil Service 23 Measuring PFM Systems Field of PFM has evolved recently, moving towards more assessment standardization New set of PFM indicators to monitor quality of PFM system at high-level See www.pefa.org Recommended with approach to working with countries Country-led reform agenda Donor coordination around agenda Shared information pool – common PEFA framework 24 PFM PEFA Indicators 11. Orderliness in annual budget process 12. Multi-year perspective Budget Execution Budget Formulation 26. External audit 27. Legislative scrutiny of budget 28. Legislative scrutiny of external audit reports Accounting and Reporting External Audit and Oversight 13. Transparency of taxpayer obligations and liabilities 14. Effectiveness of taxpayer registration and assessment 15. Effectiveness of tax collection 16. Predictability of funds for commitment 17. Recording/management of cash, debt and guarantees 18. Effectiveness of payroll controls 19. Competition, value for money and controls in procurement 20. Effectiveness of internal controls 21. Effectiveness of internal audit 22. Accounts reconciliation 23. Resources received by service delivery units 24. Quality and timeliness of in-year budget reports 25. Quality and timeliness of annual financial statements Cross-cutting Indicators 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Aggregate expenditure out-turn Composition of expenditure out-turn Aggregate revenue out-turn payment arrears Classification of the budget 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Comprehensiveness of information unreported government operations Transparency of inter-governmental fiscal relations Oversight of aggregate fiscal risk Public access to key fiscal information 25 General References SIGMA Policy Brief No. 1: Anatomy of the Expenditure Budget (1997) OECD Managing Government Expenditure. Schiavo-Compo and Tommasi. Asian Development Bank. 1999 Government Budgeting and Expenditure Controls, Theory and Practice. Premchand. IMF. 1993 Public Expenditure Management. IMF. 1993. Treasury Reference Model (Bank PE website) A Contemporary Approach to Public Expenditure Management. Schick, Allen. World Bank Institute. 1999. Public Expenditure Handbook. World Bank, 1998. Managing Public Expenditure: A Reference Book for Transition Countries. Richard Allen and Daniel Tommasi, Eds. OECD. Paris, 2001. Public Financial Management Performance Measurement Framework. PEFA. Washington, D.C. June 2005. See www.pefa.org for PEFA Performance Measurement Framework 26 Application: Rules and Incentives Budget Impasse Executive-legislative relations What rules might govern a budget impasse? How might they effect incentives between the legislature and executive? What might be important considerations for designing a rule? 27 Application Rules and Outcomes Table 2: Provisions for spending in the event no budget is enacted prior to the fiscal year, by system of government Non-OECD OECD Presidential Parliamentary Presidential Parliamentary (8) (5) (3) (23) Executive’s budget takes 38 % 20 % 17 % effect Previous year’s budget takes 50 % 80 % 26 % effect Legislature must vote other 33 % 39 % measures Executive falls, new 4% elections held Other (including no 12 % 66 % 13 % provisions) Source: World Bank – OECD budget procedures database at http://ocde/dyndns.org/ 28 Application Informal Rules Dominican Republic Budget Deviation, 1996-2000 Identifying sources of weakness for further investigation Identifying incentives at work Source: Dominican Republic PER 2003, background data 29 Application Dominican Republic Budget Deviation (ratio of executed to approved budget) Partido del Presidente Presidencia de la República Interior y Policía Fuerzas Armadas Finanzas Secretaría de Estado de Educación y Cultura Salud Pública Agricultura Obras Públicas Otros 1979-86 PRD 2.09 1.06 1.06 1.94 0.96 0.87 0.82 0.98 1.19 1987-96 1997-2000 PRSC PLD 7.35 2.53 1.00 1.06 0.86 0.97 0.54 1.06 0.86 0.95 0.68 0.78 0.35 0.76 0.44 0.88 1.13 1.08 Identifying trends for transparency Source: Dominican Republic PER 2003, background data 30 Above-thewaterline observation 100 clinics, but only 70 operating Exploring problems WHY? Budget not comprehensive 10 built with donor funds, donor funds off-budget Budget fragmented 10 built with domestic funds, capital budget separate Cash triage 10 funded in budget, but no cash allocated to operate WHY? Weak budget law Too rigid budget execution Low public pay WHY? Donor ring-fencing for “accountability” Line ministry gets flexible resource pool And what can be done about it? Local staff seek higher PIU pay 31