The Politics of Social Reform Two parties developed Early C Whigs used government to improve individual morality and discipline th 19 Prostitution, temperance, public education, asylums and penitentiaries Democrats felt morality through legislation was anti-republican Social reform provoked angry differences between the two parties Public Schools Common school movement Normal Schools Female teachers Party differences about organization of schools Whigs want state-level centralization Democrats preferred local school districts Ethnicity, Religion, and the Schools Issues for many Irish Catholic immigrant children Offensive texts and Bibles used in schools Some parents refused to send children to school State subsidy for Parish schools Foreign language schools for bilingual instruction created State-supported church-run charity schools Prisons State governments built and supported institutions for orphans, dependent poor, insane, and criminals Market Revolution increased visibility of these groups and cut them off from family resources Reformers assert these groups exist because of bad family situation Both political parties favored state-support for criminals and dependents Whigs favored rehabilitation Democrats favored isolation and punishment “Auburn system” Asylums Dorothea Dix By 1860: legislatures of 28 out of 33 states established state-run insane asylums Few Democrats supported insane asylums The South and Social Reform Social reform “expensive and wrong-headed” Southern schools Locally controlled Limited curriculum Temperance succeeds for individuals, but no state level prohibition Southern resistance to social reforms Doomed to failure because of human imperfection Seen as self-righteous imposition of Northeasterners American Temperance Society (1826) Lyman Beecher Six Sermons on the Nature, Occasions, Signs, Evils, and Remedy of Intemperance (1826) Temperance becomes badge of middle class respectability Ardent Spirits Military ends traditional liquor ration 1832 Congressional Temperance Society 1833 Alcohol consumption cut in half by 1840 3.9 – 1.9 gallon year The Origins of Prohibition Mid-1830s: Whigs made Temperance a political issue “Fifteen-Gallon Law” in Massachusetts 1833 Democrats: Forced temperance violates Republican liberty Alcohol becomes defining political difference for many Ethnicity and Alcohol 1840s-1850s: millions of Irish and German immigrants Germans: lager beers, old-country beer halls Irish: whiskey, bars Legitimized violence levels of male drunkenness and Nativism and temperance politics merge in the 1850s at expense of Democrats The Politics of Race Traditional view: God gave white males power over others Whig evangelicals Marriage changes from domination to sentimental partnership Emergence of a radical minority envisioning a world without power Attacked slavery and patriarchy as national sin Free Blacks North: states began to abolish slavery Revolutionary idealism Slavery was inefficient and unnecessary Gradual emancipation (Pennsylvania model) Free black populations grew and moved into the cities Many took stable, low-paying jobs Discrimination Discrimination rises White workers drive blacks out of skilled and semi-skilled jobs Blacks increasingly politically disenfranchised Segregated schools Blacks build their own institutions African Methodist Episcopal Church (1816) Black Anti-slavery activism David Walker: Appeal to the Colored Citizens of the World (1829) Harriet Tubman Frederick Douglass Abolitionists William Lloyd Garrison The Liberator (1831) American Anti-Slavery Society (1833) Abolition a logical extension of middle class evangelicalism American Anti-slavery Society demands: Immediate emancipation Full civil and legal rights for African-Americans Agitation Abolitionists minority of Evangelicals Beecher - end of slavery will come with conversion of masters Logical end of antislavery is civil war “Postal Campaign” Petition campaign Jackson administration response Censor mail Right to petition abridged Lydia Maria Child was a leading voice in the antislavery movement as well as a champion of women’s Lucretia Coffin Mott sheltered runaway slaves and became one of the early leaders of the women’s rights movement Women’s Rights Women’s role as missionaries to their family make them public reformers Antislavery movement leads women to advocate for equal rights State legislative changes in favor of women Married Woman’s Property Act (New York 1860) Women’s Rights Convention, Seneca Falls, NY (1848) Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions Female participation in politics Conclusion 1830s: most citizens firmly identified with one of the two parties: Whig or Democrat Whigs: embraced commerce and activist government Democrats: localistic and culturally conservative James Clavell’s The Children’s Story Critical Thinking Assignment What is this story about and why does it matter? Author of fiction James Clavell wrote this short manuscript to explore social and political issues. Write A 1500 word paper (+/- 10%) describing what you believe to be the most important issue or issues raised in the piece and whether these same issues have been seen in one or more occasion of American history in both, national and international relations. Due Thursday 3rd December Manifest Destiny John L. O’Sullivan Democrat Journalist New York City “our manifest destiny to overspread and to posses the whole of the continent which Providence has given us for the development of the great experiment of liberty and federated self-government entrusted to us” 1840s Growth became watchword of America Land acquired through annexation, negotiation, and war Relentless pressure on limits of Indian settlements 1850 Native American population > ½ Million Appeal of West as source of expansion Oregon and California were especially attractive Travelled through America, Mexico and Britain Missions and presidios in California Overland Trails Mormon migration to Utah, 1847 New York – Ohio – Illinois 15,000 people in Nauvoo Joseph Smith Polygamy June 1844 mob killed him in jail New leader Brigham Young Led group to Salt Lake “This is the right place” July 24, 1847 At time Mexican territory Territorial governor 1850 -57 Uneasy peace with DC Texas 1824 the Mexican government begins to encourage American settlement in Texas American slave holders conflict with Mexican authorities (slavery would be abolished in 1829) Mexico bans immigration in 1830 1834 President Antonio López de Santa Anna passes a series of laws that restrict powers of regional governments Many locals rebelled In Texas Stephen Austin and other Americans become determined to push for Independence from Mexico Sam Houston becomes leader of American Forces Initially success for Santa Anna’s forces The Alamo Golliad Texans regroup Deal crushing blow to Santa Ana at San Jacinto on April 21, 1836 To join the US or Not? Originally the idea was popular in Texas Texas begins to form ties with Europe Britain interested access to the cotton and other trade items Hope to persuade Texans to become pro-abolition Santa Anna threatens war with USA if Annexation occurs Conflict over the position of slavery in Texas leads to uncertainty 1838 the idea is rejected Election of 1844 in USA James Polk elected Pro annexation result was a mandate for territorial expansion By February of 1846 Texas was officially part of USA Texas was added as a slave state due to the Missouri compromise Missouri Compromise 1819 Missouri appealed for statehood Missouri was a slave state If added to the US this would upset the balance of slave and free states Questions arose about the roles of the Federal government making laws for the States The Solution 1) Missouri admitted as a slave state along with the addition of Maine as a free state 2) Territory north of 36´ 30º free forever All looked good until ……. Missouri adopted a STATE constitution that disallowed free African Americans from entering state Congress passed a law that Missouri could never deny any citizen of other states their rights under the FEDERAL constitution A situation had arisen within the debate over the Missouri compromise whereby The North expressed its political and moral opposition to slavery The South had defended and promoted the “peculiar institution” that was slavery Meanwhile back in Texas….. Mexico considered annexation of Texas a hostile act America was unable to get money from Mexico to pay the damage claims that American Texans had dispute over the southern boundary of Texas Mexico wanted the old border Nunces USA wanted the Rio Grande At the same time Americans were pushing into California In 1843 Mexico had ordered the expulsion of Americans from California US president Polk sent Slidell to Mexico to negotiate the offer was US government would assume damage claims in return for Mexican acceptance of lower border line Offer of $5 Million for New Mexico Offer of $20 Million for California Mexico refused to negotiate USAinDeclares on May 12, 1846 part duewar to the political upheavals in Mexico Kearny Taylor Scott New Mexico and California Northern Mexico Landed at Vera Cruz - fought Marched to California along his way to Mexico city defeats Santa Fe Trail and met up Santa Anna at Buena Forced Peace treaty on with Freemont and the Vista Bear Mexicans Flag Republic soldiers Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo February 1848 Mexico cedes New Mexico and California Mexico recognizes Rio Grande boundary USA pays Mexico $15 Million USA assumes America damage claims Sectional Crisis Slavery in the New Territories From the south Congress has no right to exclude slavery in new territories From the North Congress has the right to make laws for the new territories Moderate view proposes “Squatter Sovereignty” later known as “Popular Sovereignty” 1850 Compromise Senator Henry Clay Attempted to introduce a bill that would settle the question over slavery in the new territories The collection of issues he wished to introduced became known as the Omnibus Bill He died without getting it passed Stephen A Douglas took on the compromise legislation and after separating it he got it passed CA admitted as a free state NM & Utah admitted with no reference to slavery Texas debt assumed and boundary restricted Slave trade but not slavery banned in DC New slave fugitive law passed The disputes of the 1840s Over the role that slavery would play in the development of the USA Would transform the abstract idea of secession into a real possibility to some appeared necessary to others unavoidable Fugitive Slave Law Constitution provided for return of escaped slaves Antislavery movement hampered state compliance after the 1830s Prigg v. Pennsylvania (1842) enforcement a federal responsibility Northern states passed personal liberty laws to prevent recapture of fugitive slaves Northerners who did not necessarily oppose slavery opposed return of fugitives Southerners saw return as matter of honor and rights Law created extensive system for capturing and returning runaways Abolitionists vowed to resist Even non-abolitionists were shocked at reality of enforcing the law Horror stories of capture 1854 Federal marshals arrest Anthony Burns in Boston Abolitionists poured into Boston A number attacked the federal court house Deputy killed Eventually 200 marines and soldiers escorted While abolitionists held the American flag upside down Signifying loss of liberty in the cradle of the revolution Second case Margret Garner Escaped from Kentucky to Ohio with her children Rather than return herself and children she attempted to cut throats Succeeded only with three year old daughter Toni Morrison “Beloved” Led to writing of Uncle Tom’s Cabin in 1851 Harriet Beecher Stowe published in 1852 Runaway bestseller Helped shape an entire generation’s view of slavery Break up of families Wide but hostile readership in South Dozens of pro slavery novels produced little “The impact book that started a war” 1853 saw another land purchase by the US The Gadsden Land purchase In part as a possible cross country railroad path Stephen A Douglas Pushing for a northern route west from Chicago January 1854, introduced a Bill that became known as the Kansas-Nebraska Act A railroad bill that turned into much more In order to get his bill passed he needed broad support including southern congressmen “All questions pertaining to slavery in the Territories, and in the new States to be formed therefrom are to be left to the the people residing therein, through their appropriate representatives” He also put in a clause repealing the Missouri compromise Once more this was there to draw southerners to vote for his plan However, he underestimated the feelings over the issue of slavery It was assumed, correctly, that Nebraska would go to the abolitionists Kansas however, was less certain It was next to a slave state in Missouri For many the campaign for Kansas was a precursor for the civil war Bleeding Kansas In order to ensure that the “right” decision would be made supporters from both the Pro slavery and Anti slavery groups began to move into Kansas Anti Slavery William H. Seward “Since there is no escaping your challenge, I accept it in behalf of the cause of freedom. We will engage in competition for the virgin soil of Kansas, God give victory to the side which is stronger in numbers as it is in right” Pro slavery Senator David Atchison “We are playing for a mighty stake” “If we win in we carry slavery to the Pacific ocean; if we fail we lose Missouri, Arkansas, Texas and all the territories; the game must be played boldly” Struggle for control of Kansas became intense after 1854 Border ruffians from Missouri crossed into Kansas to vote illegally for slave government Majority favored free soil and opposed slavery Kansas became the leading issue in politics Two competing legislatures by 1856 Dispute led to caning of Senator Charles Sumner Lawrence May 1856 Pro slavery group attacks Lawrence Newspaper offices destroyed Abolitionist Governors house burned Free State Hotel Destroyed Pottawatomie Creek Radical abolitionist John Brown led his 4 sons and 3 other men to Pottawatomie Creek Dragged 5 pro slavery men from their homes Hacked them to death in front of their families End 1856 250 dead and $2 million in property damage