DCAA Audits: Current Trends and Issues Presented to: National Contract Management Association October 13, 2011 Wayne Murdock, CPA/CISA Sr. Managing Consultant Beason & Nalley, Inc. Copyright 2011 Beason & Nalley, Inc. 1 Objectives • Background events affecting DCAA audit priorities and approach • Impact of events on audits • What audits come first • What audits come later • Primary audit issues: • Cost proposals • Accounting systems • Incurred costs • Predictions going into FY 2012 2 Events that Changed DCAA Landscape • GAO (2008 and 2009 reports) • Independence • Inadequate internal controls audits • Insufficient transaction testing • Audit supervisors overriding auditor findings • Lack of auditor training • Too much emphasis on metrics 3 Events that Changed DCAA Landscape • GAO recommendations • More audit work to substantiate conclusions • Emphasis on quality vs metrics • Risk based audit approach • More authority should be given to DCAA in access to records 4 Events that Changed DCAA Landscape Commission on Wartime Contracting • First interim report: lack of sufficient numbers of competent government acquisition officials • August 2009 Hearing pitted DCMA against DCAA • 2010 Hearings ramped up government challenges to prime contractor management of subcontractors 5 Initial Impact on DCAA • • • • • • • Increased DCAA independence Increase substantive testing More aggressive access to records policy Less focus on materiality & increase in audit findings All internal controls deficiencies significant Increase in audit staffing DCAA appealing decisions not consistent with audit findings • Lack of resources 6 DCAA Audits - Highest Priority • • • • • • Cost proposals Any other demand requests from DoD REAs, terminations, & change order proposals Follow-up audits Defective pricing audits DCMA and DCAA Joint Cost Recovery Initiative 7 DCAA Audits - Secondary Priority • • • • Incurred Cost Internal Controls Accounting System audit Civilian Agency audits Expect stop and go audits 8 Understanding Audit Process &Working Relationships with Auditors 9 Understanding General Audit Process • Auditor Planning – Gain understanding of relevant internal controls – Preliminary evaluation of data – Perform risk assessment – Determine scope – Discuss with supervisor – Audit program 10 Understanding General Audit Process • Executing Audit Plan – Review policies/procedures if necessary – Obtain sufficient evidential data – Document basis of findings with adequate working papers – Discuss with supervisor 11 Understanding General Audit Process • Audit Report – Include appropriate opinion or statement of issues – Include adequate explanation of questioned costs or deficient practices – Obtain Contractor Comments – DCAA Internal Review process (Technical and/or Management) 12 Contractor Preparations for Audit • When notified of audit, discuss with auditor – Defined purpose of audit and likely procedures – Personnel most likely required to support audit – Preliminary data required - ask to put in writing – Dates/duration of audit – Names of auditors performing audit (if “new auditor” will they have a senior auditor helping them) • Request entrance conference (face to face), if not offered by auditor 13 Contractor Preparations for Audit • Preparations for entrance conference – Gather data requested & have available – Read applicable DCAA information/guidance – If follow-up audit, have corrective plan ready • During entrance conference – Ask questions & take notes – Designate principal point of contact – Identify methods for delivery of data – Discuss time frame of audit 14 Coordination During Audit • During audit – Maintain close contact with auditor – Address problems immediately – Provide access to data promptly - know what data auditor has been provided & compliance implications – Request periodic status of audit 15 Coordination During Audit • During exit meeting – Understand all problems or issues raised – Ask for additional time to resolve problems or provide added data before final report is released – Ask for report draft, not just “findings” – Request added audit calculations/workpapers if necessary to clarify auditor’s position – If General FAR Reference, ask for more specific FAR reference (e.g. FAR 31.205-43 vs. FAR 31.205) 16 General Guidelines - Audit Exceptions Audit findings to which contractors must respond • Questioned costs—examples: Incurred cost proposals Forward pricing proposals Indirect billing rates • Business Systems (internal control) deficiencies: Systems issues—”risk” of overcharging gov’t Examples—accounting, billing, estimating, etc. Recommendations may include added oversight & withholds of billed costs 17 Summary of the General Audit Process • Contractor’s obligation – Provide all relevant evidential data requested – Adequately support company position/policy – Respond to audit exceptions with sufficient & documented explanation • Auditor’s obligation – Provide well-supported conclusions based on adequate evaluation of company data – Support & disclose those conclusions in report/memo 18 Responding to the Draft Audit Report • Address each exception as there is a valid basis • Response should be respectful • Identify corrections implemented or provide a corrective action plan • Ensure written response identifies all relevant regulations in their full context • Do not include “case law” • Revisit DCAA’s audit process for compliance with internal DCAA policies and interpretation of regulations 19 Issues on DCAA’s Hot Spot List • Cost proposals – Overall adequacy issues FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 – Forward pricing rates out years and inadequate budgetary information – Insufficient cost support for subcontractor proposals 20 Issues on DCAA’s Hot Spot List • Accounting systems - if requested or for follow-up – Attribute statistical sampling of transactions – Accounting for unallowable costs – Insufficient documentation – Lack of written policies & procedures – Almost all deficiencies regardless of apparent insignificance will be deemed significant – Unpredictable time frame for corrective action followup 21 Issues on DCAA’s Hot Spot List • Incurred cost proposals (if initiated) • Extensive testing (transaction analysis) - variable sampling • Costs questioned if documentation not sufficient higher use of “reasonableness test” • Focus on sensitive accounts— entertainment/recreation, advertising, exec. compensation, prof. fees, travel, and organization costs • Recommendations of penalties application (expressly unallowable indirect costs) 22 Predictions • • • • Turnaround time not likely to improve Internal controls & Incurred Cost audits lengthy Auditors will report internal controls deficiencies More pressure on contractors to provide access to records • Improvement in auditor communication • Continued extensive testing 23 24 Comments or Questions 25 Beason & Nalley, Inc. 101 Monroe Street Huntsville, Alabama 35801 256-533-1720 Wayne Murdock, CPA/CISA Government Compliance Sr. Managing Consultant wmurdock@beasonnalley.com 26