Surveillance and
Broadcast Services
ADS-B Status Briefing:
ASAS TN2
By: Vincent Capezzuto
Date: April 14, 2008
Federal Aviation
Administration
Agenda
• Dual Track Strategy
• Requirements
• Acquisition Status
– Activity Description
• Rulemaking Status
– NPRM
• Air-to-Air Applications
• Discussion Points
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
2
Dual Track Strategy
Ground Infrastructure
2/2006 – 11/2006
11/2006 – 8/2007
Acquisition
Planning
2/2008 – 1/2009
Deploy
Ground
Infrastructure
Acquisition
Execution
Essential
Services ISD
4/2008 – 3/2010
Test Ground
Infrastructure /
Voluntary
Avionics
Equipage
10/2009 – 4/2010
Initial
Operating
Capability
9/2010
Critical
Services
ISD
2010 – 2013
11/2008
Pre-NPRM
Separation
Standards
Modeling
RPR
Phase I
RPR
Phase 2
NPRM
4/2006 – 9/2006
= Completed
Separation
Standards
Approval
1/2007 – 8/2007
Avionics Equipage
10/2007
= In Process
Ground
Infrastructure
Deployment
Avionics
Equipage
4/2010
RPR
Phase 3
3/2008 – 2/2009
Final Rule
4/2010
2010 – 2020
Avionics
Equipage
Begins
5/2010
RPR = Rulemaking Project Record; NPRM = Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; ISD = In-Service Decision
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
3
FY08 Accomplishments / Plans
Planned Date of Completion /
Status
Milestone
FY2008
Release of NPRM
October 2007 / Complete
Integrated Baseline Review
October 2007 / Complete
Preliminary Design Review
November 2007 / Complete
Critical Design Review
February 2008 / Complete
Close of NPRM Comment Period
March 2008 / Complete
Factory Acceptance Test for Broadcast Services
April 2008 / Ongoing
Key site equipment delivery, installation and
checkout
May 2008 / Equipment Delivery
and Installation Ongoing
Service Acceptance Test for Broadcast Services
May 2008
Initial Operating Capability of Broadcast
Services
August 2008
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
4
Total Requirements: Critical, Essential, IRD, Test
Case
717 Total VRTM Requirements
800
717
700
600
500
400
305
239
300
200
103
51
100
19
0
Essential
Specification
Critical
Specification
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Service Delivery
Point - IRD
CD - IRD
T - 2100 G (Test
Case)
Total
Federal Aviation
Administration
5
Acquisition Status: Ground Infrastructure System Architecture
1090 ES A/V
ADS-B Messages
Radio Station
UAT A/V
ADS-R/TIS-B Messages
•••
Radio Station Segment
ADS-R/TIS-B Messages
FIS-B Messages
ADS-B Messages
Radio Station Layout Provides RF
Coverage Over a Set of Service Volumes
Radio Station
Network Segment (MPLS VPN)
NOC/P
Oakton, VA
NOC/B
Middletown, NJ
Control Segment
ADS-B Reports
Service Status Reports
Control Station
Data Center/Boston, MA
Control Station
Ashburn, VA
Data Center/Atlanta,
GA
WSI FIS-B
Data Source
Andover, MA
Control Station
Data Center/Phoenix, AZ
Control Station
Data Center/Seattle, WA
WSI FIS-B
Backup
Atlanta, GA
Network Segment (MPLS VPN)
ADS-B Reports
Service Status Reports
TIS-B and FIS-B Reports
FAA ATC Automation
FAA Service Monitor
Legend:
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Radio
Radar and MLAT Data
FAA TIS-B Data Sources
Network Control
FAA
Federal Aviation
Administration
Weather
6
Acquisition Status: Implementation
Activities
• Began process for transmit authorization for eleven SV 168
(Miami) Radio Stations
– Planned for April 30 through Special Temporary Authorization (STA)
– Permanent FTA processing underway in parallel
• Supported installation of SDP equipment rack at ZMA, ZJX,
and MIA TRACON
– En Route Communications Gateway (ECG) connection for radar data
for TIS-B is awaiting completion of ECG System Support Modification
• Coordinating with ITT for site surveys of SDPs
– 6 oil platforms surveyed for surveillance and AWOS (an estimated 17
total platforms will be surveyed before April 30)
– SDF, ZID, PHL, ZHU, ZNY, ZDC, & PCT targeted for summer 08
– NCPs and installation plans are in planning stages
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
7
ITT Radio Station Infrastructure (Ground Site)
Propane tank
Backup generator
Enclosure
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
2 GPS antennas
Environmental control
Federal Aviation
Administration
8
Acquisition Status: Implementation Issues
•
Issues
–
–
•
Key Site SAT
–
–
–
•
Several sites held up in National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) process
FTA approvals expected end of April for initial sites & May for others
On schedule – no margin in schedule
SAT start – May 15, 2008 and SAT complete – May 30, 2008
Only 91 days after SAT completion until IOC (no slack)
Required Work Around
–
–
–
–
Two sites on portable towers (COWs) until July due to NEPA
COWs are in precisely the same locations as the permanent towers
Transition two sites from COWs to permanent tower between SAT and IOC
Must ensure transition does not interfere with Field Fam efforts
COW (Cell On Wheels)
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
9
Acquisition Status: Scheduled On-Air Dates
ZJX
Lakeland Linder
Regional Airport
Sebastian Municipal
Airport
Boca Raton Airport
Dade-Collier Airport
ZMA / MIA
Florida Keys
Marathon Airport
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
10
NPRM Status
• The NPRM comment period closed on
March 3, 2008
• The FAA has categorized the comments that
were received
– Number of Submittals (excluding FAA / DOT) = 172
• Excludes duplicates, Department of Transportation and
requests for extension
– Number of Comments = 1,372 (101 positive, 1,271
non-positive)
– Number of Issues = 85
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
11
NPRM: Comments By Affiliation
Type of Affiliation
Number
Air Carrier (Domestic)
7
Aircraft Manufacturer - Transport Category
4
Aviation Law Student
6
Department of Defense
1
Individual Aircraft Owner
13
Individual Pilot - cert. type unknown
3
Individual Pilot - Private/Recreational/Sport
25
Other Government Org.
2
Aircraft Manufacturer - General Aviation
1
Association
22
Avionics Manufacturer
9
Foreign Air Carrier
1
Individual Pilot - ATP
4
Individual Pilot - Commercial Cert.
6
Other Fed. Government Agency
1
Other Individual
67
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
12
NPRM Summary: Top Issues
Issue
Number of Comments
ADS-B Benefits
137
Use of two datalink types
93
Disproportionality of costs / benefits on general aviation
75
Cost of implementation – Aircraft Owners / Operators
79
Equipment Requirements – Position Accuracy and Integrity
71
Limitation of rule to mandate ADS-B Out
42
Equipment Requirements
50
Implementation Timetable
45
System failures / backup
44
Broadcast message elements
41
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
13
ARC Formation of Working Groups
ARC Member Support
FAA
Support
SME
Industry
Support
Estimated Number
of Comments
Working Group
Team Lead
A: Link Implementation Strategy
- ADS-R, Strategies, Link
George Ligler
(PMEI)
Randy Kenagy (AOPA)
Jeff Mittelman (MITRE)
B: Programmatic Issues
- Taking advantage of existing
equipment domestically and
internationally, Cost/Benefits,
ARC recommendations
TBD
Jim Byrum (Cessna)
Perry Clausen
(Southwest Airlines)
Randy Kenagy (AOPA)
Sarah Dalton (Alaska
Airlines)
John Hansman (MIT)
Bob Hilb (UPS)
C: Performance Requirements
- WAAS, Antenna Diversity, DO260, Power
Jens Hennig
(GAMA)
Ken Dunlap (IATA)
Randy Kenagy (AOPA)
Bob Hilb (UPS)
Jeff Mittelman (MITRE)
213
D: Avionics Transition
-Retaining transponder and ELT
equipment, Retrofit and forward
fit implementation, relationship to
positioning for navigation
Rick Heinrich
(Rockwell
Collins)
Jim Byrum (Cessna)
Randy Kenagy (AOPA)
Jeff Mittelman (MITRE)
Jens Hennig (GAMA)
122
131
Gary Paull
(MCR)
340
Notes: This will be further defined in the next few days. Only non-positive comments were assigned to working groups.
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
14
Significant Comment Summary
Significant Comments
Insufficient
Benefits to
Operators
ATC surveillance should be offered in expanded airspace i.e., to lower altitudes (AOPA)
ATC surveillance should support closer separation than radar (ATA)
FAA should provide financial incentives (ATA, Boeing, Airbus, AOPA)
FAA should define ADS-B In applications that provide direct benefits to operators (ATA, Boeing, Airbus)
Disagree with
Required
Performance
and Schedule
FAA should require lower performance requirements, and accelerate implementation. Requirements
should be based on Australia/Canada/European non-radar airspace application, which would
accommodate many current aircraft (ATA, Boeing, Airbus)
FAA should defer any rule supporting ADS-B In applications until requirements for additional
applications are more mature (ATA, Boeing, Airbus)
FAA should require ADS-B In, particularly for surface safety applications, and accelerate
implementation (ALPA, NTSB)
FAA should specify requirements based on airspace, rather than one-size-fits-all. i.e., reduced
requirements in non-radar airspace, airborne vs surface. (AOPA, ATA, Boeing, Airbus)
Equipment
Strategy
Dual-link architecture limits a complete traffic picture to within coverage of ground systems, raising
safety, international compatibility concerns and some question whether the architecture can be
extended to NextGen applications. Support single-link, 1090 (Boeing, ATA, Airbus)
FAA needs to reconsider the transponder requirement and back-up surveillance strategy. Support
single-link for general aviation: On UAT, would affect TCAS and radar (AOPA)
Reconsider WAAS as only the currently-available service supporting the rule: improve GPS
constellation so that it is adequate (ATA)
Source: Bruce DeCleene Summary Memo, March 25, 2008
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
15
Significant Comment Summary
Significant Comments
National
Security
DoD requires that certain traffic cannot broadcast ADS-B (e.g., VIP traffic): need to define provisions for
accommodation (DoD)
Need to coordinate security vulnerability issues of civil traffic with DoD and DHS (DoD)
Regulatory
Strategy
Place aircraft-related requirements in airworthiness rules to streamline adoption (ATA)
Regulatory
Evaluation
Costs are underestimated (ATA, Boeing)
Add a forward-fit requirement to promote early equipage (GAMA)
Source: Bruce DeCleene Summary Memo, March 25, 2008
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
16
Draft ARC / RPR Phase III Timeline
Task:
Date:
Comment period ends
March 3, 2008
ARC meetings (bi-weekly)
Biweekly from March 11, 2008
ARC recommendations drafted
August 12, 2008 (was May 6, 2008)
Public meeting(s) held (notice published in Federal Register at least 30
days prior)
Early September 2008 (was May
2008)
ARC recommendations finalized and submitted to FAA
September 26, 2008 (was June 13,
2008)
Rulemaking team finalizes Phase III RPR
November 7, 2008 (was July 29,
2008)
Phase III RPR Director & Associates level approvals
December 8, 2008 (was August 26,
2008)
Phase III RPR submitted to ARM
As appropriate for next scheduled
Rulemaking Council meeting (was
September 2, 2008)
Rulemaking Management Council approval
As appropriate for next scheduled
Rulemaking Council meeting (was
September 30, 2008)
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
17
FY08 Conference Mark
• Conference Mark provides for a total of
$110,000,000
• Specific Conference Language:
– The conference agreement provides $85,650,000 for ADS-B,
instead of $90,650,000 as proposed by the House and
$97,354,000 as proposed by the Senate. The conferees direct
FAA to examine the frequency congestion issues associated
with the ADS-B signal, and accelerate the effort to determine
how existing aircraft separation standards can be safely
reduced.
– The conference agreement provides $9,350,000 for the ADS-B
program specifically to expedite air to air capabilities.
• The FAA received the funding in January 2008
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
18
Airborne Separation Assistance System
(ASAS) and ASAS Applications
• ASAS: “An aircraft system based on airborne
surveillance that provides assistance to the flight crew
supporting the separation of their aircraft from other
aircraft.”
• ASAS application: “A set of operational procedures for
controllers and flight crews that makes use of an
Airborne Separation Assistance System to meet a
defined operational goal.”
Reference: ICAO ASAS Circular
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
19
ASAS Applications Categories
• Airborne Traffic Situational Awareness (Category I)
• Airborne Spacing (Category II)
• Airborne Separation (Category III)
• Airborne Self-Separation (Category IV)
Reference: The ‘Principles of Operation for the Use of ASAS (POASAS)’ - June 2001 - Action Plan 1 of the FAA/EUROCONTROL R&D
Committee)
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
20
Steering Group Process
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
21
Process for Selecting Applications
Identify NAS needs
(Problems)
Portfolio of
applications
from existing
sources
Decompose into subproblems
PHASE 1
Application
Characterization
Is
application a
subset of /
traceable to
an existing
AIWP
application?
Map sub-problems to
required capabilities
Refer to
AIWP
Yes
Identify applications to
support capabilities
No
Develop/Refine
application
description
Is
application
description
sufficient to
enable
business
case
analysis?
No
Yes
Eliminate applications
below minimum
threshold
Conduct business
case analysis
PHASE 2
Application
Prioritization
Rank application based
on business case results
Yes
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Steering
Committee
requires
mods to
prioritized
list?
No
Timeline of
Applications
Federal Aviation
Administration
22
Acceleration of Future Air-to-Air
Applications
•
•
•
•
•
En Route 3nm Separation
In-Trail Procedures
ATSA Conflict Detection on the Surface
Flight Deck Merging and Spacing
ASAS Forum
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
23
1. En Route 3nm Separation
ADS-B accuracy and update rate should allow a reduction in en route
separation from 5 nm to 3 nm
Initial Application: reduce delays that occur because
of the transition area between sectors that have
different separation standards. Currently, terminal
sectors have 3 nm separation and en route
sectors use 5 nm separation. Aircraft cannot
instantaneously change separation at the border
between terminal and en route. Reducing the
separation standard en route will remove any
transition area and allow full use of 3 nm
separation in terminal airspace thereby reducing
delay.
Mature Application: ADS-B separation en route
operating with other NextGen programs (e.g.
Datacom) will allow an increase in en route sector
capacity. This increase in capacity should prevent
future en route delays caused by overloaded
sector capacity.
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
En route Airspace
5 nm Separation
Transition Area
effective separation
< 5 nm but >3 nm
Terminal
Airspace
3 nm
Separation
Federal Aviation
Administration
24
2. ADS-B In-Trail Procedures
Following Climb Example
•
ADS-B In-Trail Procedures are airborne ADS-B enabled climbs and descents
through otherwise blocked flight levels
FL360
FL350
FL340
Standard Separation
•
ADS-B In-Trail Procedures
blue = ADS-B transceiver and onboard decision support system
red = ADS-B out minimum required
– Controller separates aircraft using information derived from cockpit sources and relayed
by the flight crew to the controller
– Receipt of ADS-B data from surrounding aircraft; use of a cockpit display and software
provides data to qualify the aircraft for the maneuver
• No airborne monitoring during climb required
• Controller retains responsibility for separation and approves or disapproves the request based
on the controller’s awareness of the full traffic picture
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
25
3. ATSA Conflict Detection on the Surface
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
26
4. Flight Deck Merging and Spacing (FDMS)
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
27
5. Airborne Separation Assistance System
(ASAS) Forum
• What is ASAS?
– ASAS is a new technique which, via airborne and/or ground
surveillance, presents a flight crew with a traffic picture
– The flight crew may then use the information in a defined way to
achieve some operational benefit. This use is defined as an ASAS
application and may range from enhanced see and avoid to an aircraft
managing its own separation.
• Objective of the ASAS Forum
– To accelerate the implementation of ASAS applications in the United
States focused on increased airspace capacity and safety
• Approach
– Series of workshops on key ASAS issues and Research and
Development leading to standards and certification
– Knowledge Sharing
– Stimulate academic / industry base / international community for
mining creativity
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
28
Cost Estimate for Accelerating Future Airto-Air Applications
Tasks
FY08
FY09
FY10
Total ($K)
Program Office Management
$73.9
$384.4
$96.4
$554.7
Funding and Financial Management
$36.9
$192.2
$48.2
$277.4
Program Control
$36.9
$192.2
$48.2
$277.4
Program Office Information Management
$17.8
$54.3
$38.4
$110.5
En Route 3NM Separation
$846.0
$3,089.3
$2,830.1
$6,765.4
$1,453.4
$4,834.7
$3,024.6
$9,312.7
ATSA Conflict Detection on the Surface
$446.5
$1,390.0
$439.5
$2,276.0
FDMS
$317.9
$773.3
$390.6
$1,481.9
ASAS Forum
$130.9
$133.8
$136.7
$401.4
$3,360.3
$11,044.3
$7,052.8
$21,457.4
In Trail Procedures
Total
= Task Overhead
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
29
Summary of Air-to-Air Applications
FY08 – FY10
Costs ($K):
Benefits:
Rank
Application:
1
En Route 3nm
Separation
$6,765.4
•Delay reduction in transition between en route and terminal
airspace (NAS-wide)
•$185M-$234M (2007 $) annually
•Benefit assumes full equipage
2
FDMS
$1,481.9
•Expanding ability to perform CDAs during higher levels of traffic at
top 100 airports
•$205M-$351M (2007 $) from 2014-2020
•Benefit assumes ADS-B In equipage curve used in August 2007
JRC
3
In-Trail Procedures
(Southern Pacific
Routes Only)
$9,312.7
(Incentive
Package is an
additional
$6,746)
•Reduction in fuel usage on US flights to/from Australia and New
Zealand
•$5.1M (if reference aircraft must be 260A) to $18.2M (if reference
aircraft needs only existing ADS-B out) from 2010-2020 (2007 $)
•Benefit assumes United Airlines equips relevant aircraft in 2010,
but international aircraft do not equip with 260A until 2019
4
ATSA Conflict Detection
on the Surface
N/A
ASAS Forum
$2,276.0
•Greater safety on the surface from conflict detection at top 200
airports
•$25M (2007 $) from 2011-2020
•Benefit assumes ADS-B In equipage curve used in August 2007
JRC
$401.4
•Coordinates Industry consensus on application requirements and
identifies sponsors for accelerating early benefits
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
30
Senate Discussion
• Given $9.3M, how should the FAA move
forward?
– Option 1: In-Trail Procedures ($9.3M)*
– Option 2: En Route 3nm Separation + ATSA Conflict
Detection on the Surface ($9.0M)*
– Option 3: En Route 3nm Separation + FDMS +
ASAS Forum ($8.6M)*
– Option 4: En Route 3nm Separation + In-Trail
Procedures + ATSA Conflict Detection on the
Surface + FDMS + ASAS Forum ($21.5M, including
task overhead)
*Note: These figures does not include task overhead
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
31
Next Steps
Milestone
Planned Date of Completion / Status
FY2009
In Service Decision for Broadcast Services
November 2008
Gulf of Mexico Comm. and Weather Service Acceptance Test (SAT)
March 2009
Louisville Service Acceptance Test (SAT)
April 2009
Gulf of Mexico Service Acceptance Test (SAT)
June 2009
Philadelphia Service Acceptance Test (SAT)
August 2009
Gulf of Mexico Comm. and Weather Initial Operating Capability (IOC)
September 2009
FY2010
Juneau Service Acceptance Test (SAT)
October 2009
Louisville IOC of Surveillance Services
October 2009
Final Rule Published
November 2009
Gulf of Mexico IOC of Surveillance Services
December 2009
Philadelphia IOC of Surveillance Services
February 2010
Juneau IOC of Surveillance Services
April 2010
Surveillance Services ISD for ADS-B
September 2010
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
32
Thank You
Achieving results through coordinated
international collaboration
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
33
Backup
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
34
Requirements: Essential FAT Status
Requirements E-FAT Status (03/27/08)
386
400
350
252
300
250
200
110
150
100
50
24
0
Total Verified
In Process (Expected
Completion 4/4/08)
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Remaining (Mid-End of April) Total Requirements to Verify
Federal Aviation
Administration
35
Acquisition Status: Essential Services Factory
Acceptance Test (E-FAT)
• Verifies compliance of Essential Services
equipment with Essential Services Specification
• Completion of development activities delayed start
of E-FAT by one month
• Test Readiness Review Completed on 3/13/08
• E-FAT formal test began on 3/19/08
• E-FAT activities scheduled for 4 weeks
– Efforts to finalize procedures and complete development
activities likely to extend E-FAT another 2 – 4 weeks
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
36
Work Breakdown Structure: 3NM Separation
As of 2/15/08
Version 1
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
37
Work Breakdown Structure: In-Trail
Procedures
As of 2/15/08
Version 1
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
38
Work Breakdown Structure: Air Traffic Surface
Alerting
As of 2/15/08
Version 1
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
39
Work Breakdown Structure: Flight Deck
Merging and Spacing
As of 2/15/08
Version 1
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
40
Work Breakdown Structure: ASAS Forum
As of 2/15/08
Version 1
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
41
Detailed Air-to-Air Costs
WBS
1.1
1.2
1.5
1.7
3.2
3.5.6
3.6
3.8
3.9
3.10
4.2
4.3
4.6
4.7
4.9
Tasks
Program Office Management
Funding and Financial Management
Program Control
Program Office Information Management
3NM Seperation
SE Analysis and Tools
ERAM Automation
Separation Standards
System Test and Evaluation
Operational Testing
Safety Risk Management (SRM)
CONOPS
CHI ATC User Interface (Update VISSPEC for 3NM application)
Airspace Requirements (redesign airspace to support 3NM)
Controller Procedures (develop controller procedures to support 3NM)
Controller Training Requirements (develop controller training to support 3NM
In Trail Procedures
1.4
2.3
2.4
3.2
3.5
3.6
3.8
3.9
3.10
4.3
4.7
4.9
4.5.11
Agreements
Avionics Standards
International Standards
SE Analysis and Tools
Automation (ATOP)
Separation Standards
System Test and Evaluation
Operational Testing
Safety Risk Management (SRM)
CHI ATC User Interface
Controller Procedures
Controller Training Requirements
ADS-B ITP development and implementation
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
FY08
$73.9
$36.9
$36.9
$17.8
$846.0
$140.3
$500.0
$46.8
$46.8
$93.5
$18.7
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$1,453.4
$41.1
$25.0
$212.8
$374.0
$500.0
$46.8
$46.8
$93.5
$93.5
$20.0
$0.0
$0.0
FY09
$384.4
$192.2
$192.2
$54.3
$3,089.3
FY10
$96.4
$48.2
$48.2
$38.4
$2,830.1
$2,000.0
$430.0
$95.6
$47.8
$191.1
$0.0
$95.6
$95.6
$38.2
$95.6
$4,834.7
$42.0
$75.0
$212.8
$2,000.0
$390.6
$48.8
$97.7
$293.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$3,024.6
$43.0
Total ($K)
$554.7
$277.4
$277.4
$110.5
$6,765.4
$140.3
$4,500.0
$820.6
$191.1
$192.2
$577.6
$18.7
$95.6
$95.6
$38.2
$95.6
$9,312.7
$126.2
$2,000.0
$773.3
$95.6
$47.8
$191.1
$0.0
$330.0
$525.0
$542.1
$2,000.0
$390.6
$48.8
$97.7
$293.0
$0.0
$20.0
$47.0
$84.5
$425.5
$374.0
$4,500.0
$1,164.0
$191.1
$192.2
$577.6
$93.5
$370.0
$572.0
$626.6
Federal Aviation
Administration
42
Detailed Air-to-Air Costs (Cont.)
Air Traffic Surface Alerting
2.3
3.2
3.8.6
3.9.7
3.10
4.5.10
Avionics Standards
SE Analysis and Tools
Philadelphia Key Site Tests (SIT & SAT)
Philadelphia Key Site OT (STARS)
Safety Risk Management (SRM)
ATSA Surface with Alerting
Use of Class 2 EFB for indications
Certification 4 stages - ACSS on UPS A/C
Ops Approval 5 stages / IOC at SDF and PHI
FDMS
3.2
3.6
3.8.6
3.9.7
3.10
4.5.7
4.6
4.7
4.9
$46.8
$46.8
$46.8
$93.5
$93.5
$0.0
$0.0
$317.9
$46.8
$1,390.0
$439.5
$2,276.0
$212.8
$100.0
$95.6
$47.8
$95.6
$1,051.1
$0.0
$955.6
$95.6
$773.3
$48.8
$97.7
$97.7
$195.3
$0.0
$0.0
$195.3
$390.6
$191.1
$192.2
$240.0
$1,339.9
$93.5
$955.6
$290.9
$1,481.9
$46.8
$296.6
$143.4
$143.4
$143.4
$0.0
$0.0
$382.3
$133.0
$193.2
$401.4
$114.7
$286.7
$21,457.4
SE Analysis and Tools
Separation Standards
$247.8
Philadelphia Key Site Tests (SIT & SAT)
$46.8
$47.8
Philadelphia Key Site OT (STARS)
$46.8
$47.8
Safety Risk Management (SRM)
$46.8
$47.8
Merging and Spacing
$0.0
$0.0
ACSS algorithm update, cert, ops approval update on UPS A/C (note: assumes a GST
$0.0
is available)$0.0
Airspace Requirements
$93.5
$191.1
Controller Procedures
$37.4
$95.6
Controller Training Requirements
$0.0
$95.6
ASAS Forum
1.7
4.5.12
$446.5
$212.8
Program Office Information Management
ASAS forum
Total
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
$130.9
$37.4
$93.5
$3,360.3
$133.8
$38.2
$95.6
$11,044.3
$48.8
$48.8
$48.8
$48.8
$0.0
$0.0
$97.7
$0.0
$97.7
$136.7
$39.1
$97.7
$7,052.8
Federal Aviation
Administration
43
Air Transport Equipage
Air Transport
ADS-B Equipage
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
ADS-B Out
ADS-B In EFB Display
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
2035
2034
2033
2032
2031
2030
2029
2028
2027
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
0%
Year End
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
44
GA and Air Taxi ADS-B Equipage
General Aviation and Air Taxi
ADS-B Equipage
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
ADS-B Out
ADS-B In
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
2035
2034
2033
2032
2031
2030
2029
2028
2027
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
0%
Year End
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
45
ITT Radio Station Infrastructure (Antennas)
UAT
Antenna
Two 1090
(directional)
Two 1090
(directional)
UAT
Antenna
1030 Receive
Antenna
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
46
ITT Radio Station Infrastructure (Antennas)
UAT omni
dBs 5100A
1030 (9dBi)
GD 101V @ 50
deg. HPBW
1090
Pair
•Nominal Installation : 3 ft pole dia. & 6 ft. arms
•1030 at 45o to mounts between UAT & 1090 pair
•1090s are in pairs mounted at 90o aimed at 4 sectors
•UAT is ~91o &10’ from nearest 1090 boresight
•UAT is ~58o & 6.5’ from 1030 boresight
•1030 is ~128o & 6.5’ behind 1090 boresight
•1090 is ~50o minimum off the 1030 boresight
UAT omni
1090 Pair of
dBs 5100A-D
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
47