World Languages Model Programs

advertisement

World Languages Model

Programs

C H E R I Q U I N L A N

C O O R D I N A T O R , W O R L D L A N G U A G E S ,

I N T E R N A T I O N A L E D U C A T I O N & G I F T E D A N D

T A L E N T E D

C H E R I . Q U I N L A N @ D O E . S T A T E . N J . U S

PROCESS

COLLABORATIVE EFFORT: NJDOE, FLENJ, NJ WORLD

LANGUAGES SUPERVISORS & MEMBERS OF THE

HIGHER EDUCATION COMMUNITY

• SELF-EVALUATION

• REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS

• SITE VISITS

• MODEL PROGRAM STATUS

• CEREMONY

• RESOURCE CENTERS

CONNECTIONS TO NJDOE INITIATIVES

ESEA WAIVER:

Principle 1: College and Career Ready Expectations for All Students

Principle 2: State-Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and

Support

Principle 3: Supporting Effective Instruction and Leadership

WORLD LANGUAGES MODEL PROGRAM

RESOURCE CENTERS

District Type of Program Supervisor

Englewood Public Schools Immersion Programs

Fair Haven Public Schools K-8

Princeton Public Schools K-12

West Windsor-Plainsboro

Regional School District

K-12

Mercedes Gil

Ellen Spears

Priscilla Russel

Carol Meulener

Mercedes Tellez- Gil

Brain Research

College & Career Ready

What do we do to prepare student in the program?

 EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION

 BEST PRACTICE

Evaluate presentations via rubrics aligned to state assessments; and a common curriculum

Higher order thinking via Interdisciplinary Content Units

Development of vocabulary in two languages

 LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT

Use of data to support instruction

Use of technology

2012 NJASK Scores

Number of district-wide students=3,056

Percentage of free and reduced students=59.5%

Percentage of limited English students=10.49%

Number of Pre-K – 6 th Grade Dual Language students (2011-2012)= 342

THIRD GRADE

LAL

GENERAL ED

61%

MATHEMATICS 66%

FOURTH GRADE GENERAL ED

LAL

MATHEMATICS

FIFTH GRADE

LAL

MATHEMATICS

SIXTH GRADE

LAL

MATHEMATICS

38%

59%

GENERAL ED

37%

63%

GENERAL ED

37%

57%

DUAL LANGUAGE

85%

83%

DUAL LANGUAGE

78%

93%

DUAL LANGUAGE

80%

100%

DUAL LANGUAGE

85%

100%

Developing Plan

* Honors Immersion course in the Middle School

* Third language choice

A G L I M P S E I N T O F A I R H A V E N ’ S W O R L D

L A N G U A G E P R O G R A M

Seeking proficiency

Key Components

Teacher learning and collaboration

Proficiency targets

Data collection and assessment

Thematic units

Strong philosophical underpinnings

Activities that support communication

Students at the center

PRINCETON PUBLIC SCHOOLS

BUILDING UPON A SUCCESSFUL PROGRAM

 EMPHASIS ON COMMUNICATION

 CONNECTIONS TO OTHER DISCIPLINES

 ROLE OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

 FUTURE PLANS: DUAL LANGUAGE

Building upon a Successful Program

Continual Improvement

• Program Evaluation

• Assessments & Student Data

• Professional Development

Our Program

Elementary

Spanish or Chinese: twice a week

Middle

Spanish, Chinese, French or German: daily classes

High School

Spanish, Chinese, French, German or Latin: rotation basis (three out of every four days)

Focused Initiatives from

Program Evaluation

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Shared philosophy: four meetings all staff per year

Development of a Participation Rubric incorporating the

21 st Century Skills

Clear proficiency targets for each course based on the

Standards

New Spanish courses: reflection of student needs

Common assessments and rubrics

Examination of samples of student work: consistency in scoring

Assessments that Determine What

Students Can Do With the Language

 Elementary Schools: SOPA (Student Oral

Proficiency Assessment)

 Middle Schools: four common assessments

(Integrated Performance Assessments)

High Schools: four common assessments:

Midterms and Finals are Integrated Performance

Assessments

Pilot Program for High School Reform in

World Languages

Four year commitment (2009-2013) to assess students through our world language program

OPIC (Spring 2010 & 2013)

Computer-based oral proficiency assessment

WPT (Spring 2010 & 2013)

Functional writing proficiency assessment

STAMP (Spring 2011 & 2012)

Computer-based oral and writing assessment

WW-P Student Results

Novice Mid

Novice High

Novice High+

OPIC 2010

Speaking

9 th Graders

1

6

0

STAMP 2011

Speaking

10 th Graders

0

1

3

STAMP 2012

Speaking

11 th Graders

0

0

0

WPT 2010

Writing

9 th Graders

0

2

0

STAMP 2011

Writing

10 th Graders

0

1

0

STAMP 2012

Writing

11 th Graders

0

0

0

31 24 13 21 23 4 Intermediate

Low

Intermediate

Low +

Intermediate

Mid

Intermediate

Mid+

Intermediate

High

0

11

1

0

15

6

0

0

19

10

4

0

0

26

0

1

11

7

5

2

9

22

6

5

LINKS

Self-Evaluation

Model Programs Resource Centers

Model Curriculum Project

World Language Standard & Related Resources

Download