Recent Findings and Resources for Early Childhood Intervention Programs Deborah Parrish Vice President for the Education, Human Development and the Workforce Program, AIR Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Presented at the Conference on Inclusive Education for Children with Disabilities Moscow, September 2011 Overview of Presentation • Recent Findings from Preschool for All Evaluation, San Mateo, California Use of Ages and Stages Screening Tool Case Study of a Collaborative Inclusion Model Evaluation of a partner agency’s services: the Early Childhood Mental Health Consultation Project 2 Overview of Presentation, continued • Resources from AIR’s work for national (USA) Technical Assistance Centers: National Center on Response to Intervention Center for Early Literacy Learning Project Launch 3 Preschool for All (PFA) Process Evaluation, San Mateo and San Francisco Counties • State-supported high quality preschool programs meeting minimum quality criteria and inclusive of all children • AIR evaluation examined all aspects of program implementation, 2005-2010 • Focus on findings from 3 sub-studies: Use of Ages and Stages Screening Tool Case Study of Collaborative Inclusion Model Early Childhood Mental Health Consultation Project 4 Ages and Stages Screening Tool • ASQ for children 4-60 months old; ASQ:SE for children 6 months to 5 years old • Annual requirement for all PFA children • Completed with parental input • Includes communication, gross and fine motor, problem-solving, and personal-social skills • Cut-off scores indicate need for follow-up assessment(s) and diagnosis 5 Ages and Stages Screening Findings • Helped staff establish positive relationships with parents early in the program year • Identified children early for further evaluation, assessment, and special services • Indicated need for standardized decision rules for results close to the cut-off scores – and related teacher training for consistency • Required time and expense to enable teachers to be trained and participate in screenings with parents 6 Collaborative Inclusion Model • PFA teachers desired more training, support, and specialized staff to serve children with diagnosed special needs in their classrooms • Strong and effective partnerships and vehicles for communication among key agencies were critical to success • Parent partnerships were strongly encouraged and parent feedback was extremely positive • Close physical proximity to trained special education providers was a facilitating factor 7 Early Childhood Mental Health (ECMH) Consultation Project • ECMH funded through PFA as a support to staff and families, providing staff/parent training, prevention, and early intervention services to address children’s behavior and social-emotional well-being • PFA teachers reported ECMH as “highly effective;” parents modified their parenting practices and communication with teachers • Children were served who were not eligible for services elsewhere 8 Resources • National Center on Response to Intervention, U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) http://www.rti4success.org/ • Center for Early Literacy Learning (OSEP) http://www.earlyliteracylearning.org/productsct.php • Project Launch, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) http://projectlaunch.promoteprevent.org/ 9 Deborah Parrish Phone: 650-843-8109 E-Mail: debparrish@air.org 2800 Campus Drive, Suite 200 San Mateo, CA, 94403 USA Website: www.air.org 10