War Room
A Review by Justin Peters
September, 2015
If you do not know the Kendrick brothers by name, you almost certainly know
them by their films: Flywheel (2003), Facing the Giants (2006), Fireproof (2008),
and Courageous (2011). Stephen, Alex, and Shannon Kendrick have just
released their fifth faith-based film, War Room. War Room, starring popular Bible
teachers Priscilla Shirer and Beth Moore, looks like it may well be the most
successful of their films to date bringing in $11 million just on its opening
weekend; more than triple it’s $3 million production budget.
Given the popularity of Christian themed films and the considerable buzz about
this one in particular, my wife, Kathy, and I went to see War Room on the
evening of September 3rd so that I could write a review. For those of you who
read my review of Mark Burnett and Roma Downey’s movie, Son of God, you
know that I am a bit skeptical of the Christian movie genre as a whole.
Nonetheless, I do want to offer what I hope to be a fair review. This review will
not touch on every single facet of the movie or even on every theme it presents,
but I do hope to address what I believe to be the most important of them.
Plot Overview
War Room is centered around Tony and Elizabeth Jordan, their ten year old
daughter, Danielle, and Elizabeth’s real estate client-turned Christian friend, Mrs.
Clara. The Jordan marriage is in serious trouble. Tony, a pharmaceutical
salesman who travels extensively in his work, is the kind of husband and father
one loves to hate. Though a hard worker, he shows little interest in his daughter
and pursues a female work interest behind his wife’s back. Elizabeth, played by
Priscilla Shirer, goes to Mrs. Clara’s home discuss the particulars of putting it on
the market. The meeting, however, went far beyond deciding on a listing price
for the house.
Mrs. Clara, an older widow, is a Christian fiercely devoted to prayer which she
does in a closet she has dubbed her “War Room.” Mrs. Clara goes to war here,
battling Satan who is portrayed as the source of every form of evil plaguing
mankind. Rather than plotting troop
positions on a military map, Mrs. Clara
pins prayer requests and Scripture verses
on the wall of her war room, prays to God,
and rebukes the Enemy.
Mrs. Clara begins to ask Elizabeth some
probing questions about her family,
marriage, and church attendance. Upon
learning that the Jordan family is at the point of collapse, Mrs. Clara exhorts
Elizabeth to fight for her marriage in her own war room.
Slowly but surely, Elizabeth is changed by her newly found prayer life and by
reading the Bible. One day in her war room, she discovers via a friend’s text that
Tony has been seen in a restaurant with another woman. Elizabeth immediately
prays for her husband and asks God to stop him. God gives Tony a stomach
ache in the restaurant preventing him from following through with his adulterous
plans.
Shortly after this, Tony is fired from his job. Rather than the anger and sarcasm
he expected to receive from Elizabeth upon hearing this news, she offered him
love and support. The change he sees in his wife eventually changes Tony as
well. He confesses his sin and turns back to God. He seeks and is granted
forgiveness from both Elizabeth and Danielle, and the Jordan family is on the fast
track of restoration.
Despite his new life, Tony is fired from his job. What his boss did not know,
though, was that Tony had been stealing drugs from the company, selling them
and pocketing the profits. Though he had gotten away with it, his now sensitive
conscience drove him to return to meet with his former boss, confess his theft
and make restitution. His boss could easily have turned Tony in to the authorities
to face prison but chose not to do so. The Jordan family was spared the loss of
being torn apart again just as it had begun to heal. Tony eventually found a new,
though less lucrative job, his family grew closer to one another and the Lord, Mrs.
Clara’s house sold to a pastor and his wife, and all was well because of the
battles fought in the War Room.
Strengths
The movie was, of course, clean. There was neither foul language nor any
innuendos (other than what was about to happen between Tony and his almostmistress at the restaurant) anywhere to be found.
War Room emphasized the importance of fidelity to one’s spouse and cutting off
any potential threats to the sanctity of the marital covenant. The film championed
the virtues of character, integrity, and selflessness. The importance of family, and
the need for regular church attendance were stressed. Mrs. Clara (a very
2
winsome character in the film) taught Elizabeth the importance of reading
Scripture and, of course, prayer. The movie did teach the biblical truth that man
is unable to reform himself. “You can’t fix Tony. Only God can.” said Mrs. Clara
to Elizabeth.
The Gospel was, well, mostly there. Mrs. Clara presented the Gospel to
Elizabeth in one of their meetings and she talked about sin, that Jesus died on
the cross to pay the penalty of sin, was raised from the dead and that a person
must believe in Jesus and repent. These are all essential elements of the Gospel
and I am glad that they were included. That having been said, even though the
proper biblical terms were used, often these terms were not explained. The term
“repent,” for example, was used but never fleshed out. The lingo was there to be
sure, but without a biblical understanding of these terms they are just that, lingo.
Weaknesses
As I’m sure you are expecting, I did find much with which to be concerned. Some
of the film’s failures could have been avoided with more careful attention to
doctrine and theology and some of the failures, as I will explain in the conclusion,
are inherent to the genre itself and unavoidable. I will outline my concerns in a
series of “Outs:” Out of Home, Out of Order, Out of Focus, Out of Bounds and
Out of Context.
Out of Home
I may as well begin with the most politically incorrect and probably the most
controversial point I will make in this review and get it out of the way. Not
everyone reading this will agree but truth is truth.
That men and women are of equal value before God is beyond dispute (Gal. 3:
28-29). That having been said, men and women do have different roles and the
role of a young wife and mother is to be a worker in the home. The Apostle Paul
writes that older women are to teach “the young women…to love their husbands,
love their children, to be sensible, pure, workers at home, kind, being subject to
their own husbands, so that the word of God will not be blasphemed” (Titus 2:45). Note the “workers at home” part.
The context makes it quite clear that the “young women” are those who are
married and have children in the home. This text makes it quite clear that such
women’s primary place of service is not to be outside of the home but within.
Pastor and teacher Dr. John MacArthur has written that if a young woman is
adequately fulfilling all seven of the requirements listed in this passage then she
“will probably be a very busy individual” and have little time for work outside of
the home. If, however, “she still has time left over, then she would be free to
pursue enterprising and creative activities outside the home.”1 It is not that a
young woman should never engage in wage earning work of any kind. Proverbs
3
31, in fact, depicts the godly woman who may do some enterprising work from
within the home.
One of the first things I noticed in the film is that Elizabeth worked outside of the
home as a real estate agent. Had she been adequately fulfilling all of her duties
inside the home, then the case could have been made that this was permissible.
This was not the case, however. In fact, the movie actually makes a point that
Elizabeth was so involved at her job that she did not know what her daughter,
Danielle, was doing at school or in her jump-rope team.
The sad reality is that the fallen world in which we live often requires young
women to work outside of the home. Some “young women”2 have been
abandoned by their husbands and some may have husbands unable to work due
to some type of infirmity. In situations such as these work outside of the home is,
unfortunately, unavoidable.
When a young woman can avoid working outside of the home, though, she
should. If a young woman works outside of the home out of preference rather
than absolute necessity, then a biblical principle has been violated. The issue is
not a minor one. Note that if a young woman works outside of the home at the
expense of her biblical household duties, then the result is that the Word of God
is βλασφημῆται (blasphemetai), literally, blasphemed.
Writes Dr. MacArthur:
The home is where a wife can provide the best expressions of love for her
husband. It is where she teaches and guides and sets a godly example for
her children. It is where she is protected from abusive and immoral
relationships with other men and where, especially in our day, she still has
greater protection from worldly influences—despite the many lurid TV
programs, magazines, and other ungodly intrusions. The home is where
she has special opportunity to show hospitality and devote herself to other
good works. The home is where she can find authentic and satisfying
fulfillment, as a Christian and as a woman.3
Out of Order
War Room is a theological train wreck chronologically speaking. In other words,
it totally gets out of order the Holy Spirit’s work of regeneration in a person with
the fruits of regeneration.
In their first meeting, Elizabeth tells Mrs. Clara of the distressed state of her
marriage to Tony. Upon hearing this, Mrs. Clara asked her, “Have you prayed for
him?” There is nothing, of course, wrong
with this in and of itself except the fact
that Mrs. Clara made this inquiry without
having first made certain that Elizabeth
understood the Gospel herself. Though
4
Elizabeth certainly was not guilty of the overtly egregious sins of her husband,
like he, she displayed little understanding of the Gospel. She attended church
only “occasionally” and was biblically illiterate. There was no discernible spiritual
fruit in her life to indicate that she was a believer.
Another example occurs after Elizabeth hears the Gospel (most of it anyway)
from Mrs. Clara and begins to get on the straight and narrow. Shortly after
Elizabeth found out about Tony’s attempt to cheat on her, he came home from
his failed dalliance to a meal she had prepared for him. She looked at her
husband and asked, “You wanna pray?” At this point in the movie there is
absolutely no reason to believe that Tony had been converted. He had little
interest in Danielle and he did not love his wife.4 He was selfish, arrogant, was a
thief, and had no conviction over his sin. He cared only for himself, had no godly
sorrow, and showed no affections for things holy and pure. He was ignorant of
Scripture and comfortably so. That Elizabeth, by this time walking with the Lord,
would ask her husband to pray assumes that this is something he could do
which, as a lost man, he could not.
Save the prayer that one may prayer at conversion, prayer is a spiritual discipline
that can only be done by the saved. The movie gives the impression that praying
for one’s spouse or asking God to bless the evening meal can be done by one
who is lost. This, of course, is an impossibility. Before coming to Christ we are
enemies of God (Col. 1:21), dead in our sins (Eph. 2:8-9), and cannot seek Him
(Rom. 3:10-11); a condition which precludes any ability to pray (Is. 59:2).
Now, this having been said, I am not saying that this was the intention of the
Kendrick brothers. It is probably the case that they were simply portraying how
people normally speak. I am not at all saying that theologically they would believe
that lost people can pray. The problem, though, is the vagueness in which it was
portrayed.
Additionally, and even more worrisome, is that the film gives the impression that
one can live a life of habitual, unrepentant sin and still be a believer. In her own
war room, Elizabeth petitioned “Lord, I pray for Tony that you would turn his heart
back to you.”
My issue here is not that Elizabeth is praying for her husband, but that her prayer
gives the viewer the impression that Tony was a just backslidden Christian.5
“Turn his heart back to You,” she prayed. Again, Tony was an absolutely
loathsome individual at this point in the movie who displayed zero evidence he
had ever experienced regeneration.
Christians can and do sin (1 Jn. 1:8) but their lives are not to be characterized by
sin. It has been said that a Christian can stumble into sin, but he cannot swim in
it. A believer is a new creature in Christ (2 Cor. 5:17) indwelt by the Holy Spirit of
God Who produces in him good fruit (Gal. 5:22-23). Many people living lives of
5
habitual sin are told they are just “backslidden” when they’ve never slid forward in
the first place. Charles Spurgeon stated, “Unless our faith makes us pine after
holiness and pant after conformity to God, it is no better than the faith of the
devils, and perhaps it is not even so good as that.” Whether intentional or not,
there is a danger of this film giving some of its viewers a false assurance of their
salvation.
Out of Focus
War Room certainly did deal with sin but it did so, I thought, primarily on a
horizontal basis. In other words, though it showed the damaging consequences
of sin in relation to our fellow human beings, it did not focus nearly so much on
sin’s deadly consequences in our relationship to God.
Tony and Elizabeth both sinned in that they focused on their employment at the
expense of their daughter, Danielle. Tony, of course, sinned in his pursuit of a
woman who was not his wife. Eventually both came to see how their sin hurt
others and they repented. In and of itself, this is good.
What I did not see – or at least what I believed was not emphasized nearly
enough – was the vertical nature of sin. There was no mention anywhere in the
film of the wrath of God that our sin incurs. There was no mention of God’s wrath
abiding on the unbeliever (Jn. 3:36) or that we are saved from it (Rom. 5:9).
There was no mention of eternal judgment for those who die in their sins (Lk.
16:19-31).
Without first understanding the wrath of God, one cannot rightly understand the
mercy of God. Without first realizing that our sins are storing up God’s wrath
(Rom. 2:5) which will be poured out on the ungodly for all of eternity (Rev. 14:10),
we cannot truly appreciate His mercy. It is only in understanding God’s deserved
wrath that we can fully understand His undeserved mercy. It is His wrath that
makes His mercy so precious.
In watching the film both my wife and I were looking for one thing which is a
hallmark of every genuine believer: a godly sorrow over sin.
The Bible speaks of two types of sorrow over sin. There is a worldly sorrow which
is merely a guilty conscience. A worldly sorrow is one that is concerned only for
the horizontal consequences of sin and it leads to death (2 Cor. 7:10).
The other type of sorrow, however, is a
godly sorrow. A godly sorrow comes about
when we understand that our sin is first and
foremost against God. A godly sorrow is
when we grieve over our sin because we
understand that our sin grieves God and we
desire to turn from sin because we do not
6
want to grieve Him. It is this godly sorrow which “produces a repentance without
regret leading to salvation” (2 Cor. 7:10).
Unless we both missed it, neither Kathy nor I saw any godly sorrow evidenced in
either Tony or Elizabeth’s life. There definitely was sorrow over hurting others,
but nowhere in the film did we see the kind of godly sorrow exhibited by David
when he humbled himself before the Lord and said to Him, “Against You and You
alone have I sinned and done what is evil in Your sight” (Ps. 51:4).
Out of Bounds
The Apostle Paul in 1 Corinthians 4:6 exhorts the immature believers in Corinth
“not to exceed what is written.” In other words, we as believers are not to exceed
biblical parameters. Whether in our theology or in our practice we are to stay
safely within biblical parameters for when we exceed these God-given
parameters we are opening ourselves up to demonic influence and demonic
deception.
Sadly, biblical parameters dealing with
spiritual warfare are exceeded throughout
the movie. The entire film is saturated with
Word-Faith/N.A.R. spiritual warfare lingo.6
There seemed to be as much time and
effort expended in binding, rebuking and
casting out Satan by Mrs. Clara and
Elizabeth in their respective war rooms as
there was praying to God.
In one of the more emotionally rousing scenes of the film, upon discovering her
husband’s philandering ways, Elizabeth retreats to her war room. As she
repeatedly cites to herself James 4:7b, “Resist the devil and he will flee from
you,” indignation swells within her and she begins to talk to the devil. “No more,
you are done! Jesus is Lord of this house and there is no room for you anymore!
Go back to Hell where you belong and leave my family alone!” she shouts.
There are at least two significant problems with this. First, Satan is not in Hell.
Only when the eschatological events of Revelation 20 take place will he be
thrown into the lake of fire and “tormented day and night forever and ever” (vs.
10).7 The Bible makes it very clear that, for now at least, Satan is quite free
“prowling about like a roaring lion seeking someone to devour” (1 Pet. 5:8).
Secondly, and more significantly, we as believers are not to be addressing
Satan. Ever!
Consider that in Jude we have the record of Michael the archangel disputing with
the devil and arguing over the body of Moses. Jude records for us that when he
disputed with the devil, Michael the archangel “did not dare pronounce against
7
him a railing judgment, but said, ‘The Lord rebuke you!’” Think about that for just
a moment and let it sink in. If Michael the archangel – the archangel – did not
“dare” to rebuke Satan then I think it’s probably a safe bet that we should not do
so either. Pastor Jim Osman in his excellent book Truth or Territory writes, “What
God's highest holy angel would not dare to do, sinful, fallen men presume the
authority to do. It is unthinkable. I have been in the presence of Christians who
boldly declare, ‘Satan, I rebuke you in the name of Jesus,’ and I wonder, ‘Who do
you think you are?’ Rebuking, commanding, or ridiculing the devil are not tools of
effective spiritual warfare; they are marks of prideful, arrogant, self-willed false
teachers.”8
It is troubling that noted Bible teacher Priscilla Shirer does not know this and
would model such a dangerous and unbiblical practice. By exceeding biblical
parameters, people are exposing themselves to the very enemy that they fancy
themselves as rebuking.9
Incidentally, given that so many people are rebuking and binding Satan, have
you ever wondered how he seems to keep getting back out? It seems that as
soon as someone binds him, he’s free again. All of these people binding Satan
don’t seem to be tying him up very tightly. And if we can bind and rebuke Satan
(Be sure to bind him first. The last thing you’d want to do is rebuke an unbound
Satan as he might give you a nasty uppercut when you’re not looking.), why not
just bind him from all places at all times and be done with it?
But I digress.
The movie also has a decidedly mystical bent. Towards the end of the film, an
older pastor named Charles and his wife, clients of Elizabeth, are shown the
home. Charles notices the closed door to the “war room,” opens it and slowly
walks inside. He looks around, pauses, backs out of the closet, and then walks
back in as though he feels something different in the atmosphere. His wife asks
him what he is doing and he says that there has been a lot of praying in this
room. “It’s almost like it’s baked in,” said the old pastor.
This is pure mysticism. God speaks to us through the Bible and we speak to Him
through prayer. Prayer is an act of obedience that serves to conform our will to
that of the Father but it in no way changes the atmosphere in a closet, house,
hospital, gymnasium, state or country. This is hyper-charismatic, Word-Faith
mysticism.
In another scene Mrs. Clara, Elizabeth and Danielle were on their way to get ice
cream when their trip was interrupted by a knife wielding thug demanding their
money. The unflappable Mrs. Clara stared him in the eye and commanded, “You
put that knife right down in the name of Jesus.” All of the sudden the thug looked
dazed and confused. Powerless to follow through with his criminal plans, he fled
8
the scene. Saying “in the name of Jesus” to this miscreant was like giving
Kryptonite to Superman.
Throughout the film the name of Jesus is used in this way. It is used almost like a
magical incantation, a Christianized version of Abracadabra, to manipulate the
physical realm toward one’s desired outcome. Whether used in prayer to restore
a marriage or to thwart a mugging, the name of Jesus always got results in War
Room.
Contrary to the way in which it is portrayed in the film, saying “in the name of
Jesus” is not like putting in coins in some theological vending machine. The
name of Jesus is synonymous with the will of Jesus. When we pray for things in
Jesus’ name rightly, we are praying for Jesus’ will to be done (Jn. 14:13-14; 1
John 5:14-15). Using the name of Jesus does not always bring the results we
desire.
It was fidelity to the name of Jesus that led nearly all of the Apostles to gruesome
deaths. It is fidelity to the name of Jesus that has brought horrific persecution to
untold millions of Christians during the last two thousand years. Many Christians
throughout the world face persecution to this day because of the name of Jesus.
Sometimes the name of Jesus gets us not what we want, but what we may not
want. Often it is in times of trial and persecution for the believer that God is most
glorified.
Out of Context
“The thief comes to steal, kill and to destroy; I have come that they might have
life and have it abundantly” (Jn. 10:10) was quoted several times throughout the
movie. In War Room the “thief” is identified as Satan who has come to steal
people’s joy and marriages.
While it is not necessarily incorrect to identify the thief in John 10:10 as Satan,
the context of the passage argues for a much broader view. The context
indicates that the thief includes not only Satan, but any false teacher who claims
any way of salvation other than that which is found exclusively in Christ. What the
“thief” is attempting to steal is not one’s joy or marriage but rather one’s reception
of the Gospel itself. The context is that of salvation, not one of life enhancement.
The movie concluded with one of the most familiar, beloved, and yet taken out of
context passages in the Old Testament, 2 Chronicles 7:14: “If My people who are
called by My name will humble themselves, and pray and seek My face, and turn
from their wicked ways, then I will hear from Heaven, and will forgive their sin
and heal their land.” The text was shown superimposed on a shot of the United
States capitol the insinuation, of course, being that if we will repent that God will
heal our nation’s many societal ills.
9
Though a thorough treatment of this passage is beyond the scope of this article,
to apply this verse to the United States of America (or any other country for that
matter) is to employ poor hermeneutics. The context of this verse is that it is
God’s answer to Solomon’s prayer dedicating the temple recorded in the
previous chapter. There has only been, is now, and only will be one country in a
covenant relationship with God – Israel.
Another aspect of the movie that was out of context is the entire premise of
having a prayer closet in the first place. The film portrayed this room almost as
having magical powers. If you want your prayers to be effective, it’s best to pray
them in a closet emptied of its contents. Upon first consideration, this idea
appears to have biblical support:
When you pray, you are not to be like the hypocrites; for they love to stand
and pray in the synagogues and on the street corners so that they may be
seen by men. Truly I say to you, they have their reward in full. But you,
when you pray, go into your inner room, close your door and pray to your
Father Who is in secret, and your Father who sees what is done in secret
will reward you. – Matthew 6:5-6.
As we were driving home from the theater that night, Kathy and I talked about
how we would be willing to bet that thousands of people will see this film and
then go to their homes, clean out a closet and make their own “war rooms”
believing that their prayers will become more effective.
Sure enough, just this morning as I was writing this piece, I was watching the
Daystar channel as presidents and hosts Marcus and Joni Lamb played a clip
from Eyewitness New Fox 58 as Aaran
Perlman interviewed two of the Kendrick
brothers. A visibly emotional Perlman said, “I
saw this movie last weekend with a group of
people, I’m gonna start crying before I even
get into this. It changed my life so much. This
movie, it’s about prayer. It’s about finding a
room called the war room and immediately
after this movie I went home and ripped
everything out of my closet and made my own war room.” “Wow, that’s
incredible, awesome! You will see a difference in the days ahead. Write ‘em
down so you can keep up with them. It’s great to be able to check off those
prayer requests to realize God is alive and well and at work in your life,” Stephen
Kendrick responded.
While there is certainly nothing wrong with praying in a closet if that is what one
wants to do, the location is not the point. The point Jesus made in this text was
not about location but attitude. The point is that we are not to make a show of our
prayers as did the scribes and Pharisees and should remove any distractions
which may divert our attention away from the One to Whom we are praying.
Sincere, humble prayers offered in a living room, a backyard, or in an airplane at
10
40,000 feet halfway across the Pacific Ocean are heard just as well as those
offered in an empty closet. Believing that there is some special power in the
location itself is not only mystical, but borders on idolatry. The Object of our
prayers and the condition of our hearts are the important things – not the
location.
Conclusion
Some will read this review and undoubtedly think that I am being too
nitpicky and critical. I have talked to some who have seen War Room and
thought that it was great and that it had a solid biblical message. There is no
doubt that the film was Christian themed – an element that has drawn the ire of
numerous secular critics – but we are enjoined to “test all things” (1 Thess. 5:21)
through the lens of Scripture and to “study to show ourselves approved unto
God” (2 Tim. 2:15). Charles Spurgeon once said, “Discernment is not a matter of
simply telling the difference between right and wrong; rather it is telling the
difference between right and almost right.”
Finally, as I hinted at the beginning of this piece, I am not a fan of the
whole Christian movie (I am not including documentaries in this) thing in general.
It is not that I am inherently opposed to the genre per se, but rather that I believe
there to be an inherent danger in them. For one, in order to be successful at the
box office, Christian movies must be intentionally vague when it comes to many
doctrinal matters. Christian films never really go past the basics of the Gospel
and, sadly, often even fail at that. Yet the Bible says that we are to pay close
attention to doctrine (1 Tim. 4:13) and to persevere in it (vs. 16).
Additionally, these movies are highly emotional. They tug at our heart
strings. There is nothing wrong in and of itself with emotion, but emotion cannot
be a substitute for obedience to objective biblical truth. Movies in and of
themselves cannot bring lasting change to anyone’s life. It seems that every few
years or so something new is introduced to the evangelical masses and is
portrayed as the next great evangelistic super-tool. Whether it’s a blockbuster
movie like the Passion of the Christ, or best-selling books like The PurposeDriven Life, or Jesus Calling,10 people get all excited. Spin-off products follow
and incredible amounts of money are spent chasing after the latest fads. But
they are just that – fads. Recall the Prayer of Jabez craze about fifteen years
ago? Remember how everyone was praying for God to enlarge their territory? Do
you have any friends still praying the prayer of Jabez? Me neither. Without a
foundation of sound doctrine, without a constant and proper hermeneutic, all of
these things are the spiritual equivalent of a sugar pill.
It is a sad commentary, in my estimation, that so many professing
believers get so excited about the latest thing to come down the evangelical pike,
but show little enthusiasm in and put precious little effort into reading, studying
and obeying God’s Word. Watching a movie is easy. Laboring in the Word is not.
But only the latter will bear fruit that remains.
11
Source: http://www.gty.org/resources/questions/QA188/is-it-wrong-for-wivesto-work
2 For the purposes of this article when I write “young women” I am referring to the
biblical definition of the term per Titus 2.
3 Source: https://www.gty.org/resources/bible-qna/BQ101712/Does-ScripturePermit-Women-to-Work-Outside-the-Home
4 No matter how he may argue to the contrary, if a man cheats on his wife (or vice
versa) he does not love her. Such a sin breaks the marriage covenant and is in direct
contradiction to the biblical definition of love.
5 The New Testament never uses this word. It is only used in the Old Testament in
reference to Israel.
6 New Apostolic Reformation is a twin movement of Word-Faith but has even more
emphasis on signs and wonders and modern day Apostles. Some of its prominent
leaders include Bill Johnson, John Arnott, C. Peter Wagner, Cindy Jacobs and Heidi
Baker.
7 Technically, there will never even be a time when Satan resides in Hell. Revelation
20:14 states that Hell and death are thrown into the lake of fire where Satan and the
demons will already be by that time. It is a distinction with probably little
meaningful difference, but a distinction nonetheless.
8 Osman, Jim (2015-01-24). Truth Or Territory: A Biblical Approach to Spiritual
Warfare (Kindle Locations 1905-1908). Jim Osman, Kootenai Community Church.
Kindle Edition.
9 For an excellent book on spiritual warfare from a biblically sound perspective see
Truth or Territory: A Biblical Approach to Spiritual Warfare by Pastor Jim Osman.
Also available is a 6 CD set of 12 interviews with Jim Osman and this writer on the
topic of Spiritual Warfare. It is available at http://justinpeters.org/store/
10 All of these mentioned have massive doctrinal errors.
1
12