Stakeholder Matrix (Project Team)

advertisement
RARE PRIDE CAMPAIGN PROJECT PLAN
for the
Uson Buang Pongco-Bonga Fish Sanctuary and Marine Reserve
by the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources Region V
Local Government of Bacacay, Albay
and
Rare Conservation
Ruby Mendones, Conservation Fellow
Campaign Project Plan Table of Contents
A. Executive Summary
1. Introduction - Framing the problem
2. Campaign Theory of Change: a strategy for change Table and narrative
3. Site summary
4. Project team & key strategic partners
B. Social marketing profile
1. Formative Research - TWG & Stakeholder meetings
consensus workshop
outputs; Directed Conversations; FGD; Photo voice
2. Concept Model
3. Results Chain
4. Establishing a baseline: quantitative survey
5. Understanding our audience
“Nothing stops an organization faster than people who
believe that the way they worked yesterday is the best way to
work tomorrow.”- Jon Madonna
The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the
same level at which we created them. –Albert Einstein
C. MPA Governance and Management plan (BROP)
1. Abstract
2. Introduction
3. Objectives
4. MPA profile
5. Action plan
6. Funding opportunities
D. Monitoring plan
E. Work Plan with Budget
F. Endorsement of this plan
G. References and Acknowledgements
H. Appendices
1. Fisheries profile
2
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Executive Order for TWG & Mancom- May 26-27
Survey Questionnaire
Survey results
EcoGov MPA Effectiveness Rating
Letters of Support
Threat ranking
Factor chain
3
A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. Introduction
Philippines as the centre of the centre of global marine biodiversity
Scientists refer to the 7,107 islands that make up the Philippines as the “center of the center” of global marine
biodiversity. Its waters are home to whales, dolphins, 50 species of sea horses and over 2,000 species fish,
including the largest fish in the world, the whale shark. Marine resources are also critical to the food security
and livelihoods of Filipinos, as fish provide over 50% of their protein and support the livelihoods of millions of
fishers and fish-related industries throughout the country. The Philippines is located in the Coral Triangle, a vast
region in Southeast Asia made up of 18,500 islands and 647 million hectares of ocean. It is often referred to as
the “nursery of the seas” because of the more than 500 species of coral and hundreds of thousands of hectares
of sea grass and coastal mangrove forests that shelter and sustain a level of marine diversity unmatched
anywhere on the planet.
Species and Habitat under Complex Threats
Today, however the global center of marine biodiversity is under extreme pressure. Over 40% of the reef and
mangroves in the region have disappeared in the last 40 years. Near-shore overfishing is a serious threat to
these natural resources, and reversing the effects will require a significant change in human behavior. Less than
five percent of the Philippines’ coral reef ecosystems are still in pristine health, and in some fishing grounds,
biomass is less than 10% of what it was 50 years ago. Most near-shore fishing is conducted by subsistence
fishers in coastal communities although illegal intrusions by commercial fishers into municipal waters are cause
for concern.
A Campaign to Transform the Context
Developing local approaches to addressing the threat of overfishing is increasingly recognized as vital to longterm economic and environmental sustainability in the region. The vision behind this plan, and the current
cohort of 12 campaign developed under the Rare Pride Program in the Philippines, is to facilitate true
community buy and ownership of the local Marine Protected Areas building on the tools developed in 20 years
of experience in MPA management in the Philippines and combining it with the Rare Pride Methodology for
social marketing. Through this strategy the objective is to get the local fishers population as well as the wider
4
community in the Barangays surrounding the MPA to take ownership in and understand the benefit of no-takeareas and support essential management activities such as enforcement and governance of the MPA.
Cohort Theory of change: a strategy for change
In order to eliminate the principle threat of overfishing and destructive fishing the governance and
enforcement infrastructures of the no-take-zone (NTZ) at 12 sites in the Philippines will be strengthened via a
proven self-assessment and planning tool, the Participatory Coastal Resources Assessment tool (PCRA). Key
target audiences (local fishers and gleaners; the local community, the MPA enforcement team and local LGU
officials) will be informed of the benefits of the No Take Zone (NTZ), the rules of the sanctuary, and the
processes for becoming more engaged in the MPA management committee. Fishers and gleaners will come to
believe in MPA as a tool for food security, and will support new reporting structures for arrests and
prosecution of intruders. The conservation results will include increased perceived fish catch, increases in fish
numbers and species richness, increase in invertebrates, and increase in coral reef health.
5
2. Uson Buang Pongco Bonga Campaign Theory of Change
Theory of Change:
K +
TA1.Primary
Fishers (from
Uson, Buang and
Pongo Bonga)
know the
benefits and the
rules from the
NTZ
TA2 Organized
community
(secondary)
.Awareness of
the role at their
level in pursuing
plans and
programs for the
MPA and aware
of benefits of
MPA
A +
IC + BR
Fishers fully
convinced that
the MPA is both a
source of
sustained income
and food
therefore they
must believe they
can stop
intrusion in the
NTZ
fishers discuss
with one another
the
consequences of
breaking the
rules and their
role in the MPA
management
Organized
communities are
willing to
participate in and
support meetings
and activities
related to MPA
They will talk
among
themselves their
role in managing
local marine
resources for the
community
The local mgt.
Council is
strengthened to
enforce the
regulation on the
MPA and in
implementing the
Mgt Council Plan
They will entrust
the leadership of
UBPBFSMR
BC
Increase the
number of
fishermen to stop
intruding into the
NTZ
Increase the
number of
fishermen to
sustain support to
NTZ by passing
intelligence to Mgt
Council and
enforcers
TR
CR
Reduced
incidence of
intrusion and
fishing inside
the MPA NTZ
Increase in fish
catch; increase
fish biomass;
increase in reef
health
Increased level of
participation in
MPA management
6
K+
TA 3.
Communities
(primary)
Communities are
aware of the
benefits and
regulations of
their NTZ and
know who to
report to
TA4 (secondary)
Awareness of the
MPA structures,
levels of
authority and
corresponding
functions, duties
and
responsibilities in
achieving goals
for the MPA
A+
Communities
have increased
level of support
in the
enforcement of
regulations in the
MPA
Performs their
role in providing
CRM services in
the 36 coastal
barangays
including MPA
management in
Uson Buang
Pongco Bonga
IC + BR
communities
discuss with one
another their
role in reporting
intrusions,
violations in
support to MPA
management
The Council is
strengthened to
enforce the
regulation on the
MPA and in
implementing the
Mgt Council Plan
Key LGU
employees will
discuss with each
other their role
to further
strengthen the
MPA structure
Increased
protection through
monitoring
effectiveness of
regulations in the
MPA
BC
increase the
number of
community
members who
sustain support to
NTZ by reporting
violations,
intrusions
For the Local
Goverrnment Unit
employees to
afford the MPA
sustained policy
support
TR
Reduced
incidence of
intrusion and
fishing inside
the MPA NTZ
CR
Inncrease in fish
catch; increase
fish biomass;
increase in reef
health
7
Theory of Change narrative:
In order to reduce the threat of increased incidence of intrusion and fishing inside the MPA NTZ, the
target audiences comprised of fishers & costal residents from Uson, Buang and Pongo Bongawill (primary TA), and organized
groups and key LGU employees (secondary/BR groups the campaign will work with) from will be made aware of the benefits of
having an NTZ as well as the rules and regulations with regard to the NTZ.
Theory of Change narrative:
The behavior change will become evident when the MPA rules are actively enforced leading to an increase in arrests and
prosecutions of intruders into the MPA. Also, the fishers are encouraged to voluntarily comply with MPA rules. This will result
in reduced fishing in the MPA and increased sustainable fishing gears such as hook and line.
In the end, the campaign’s impact will be measured by significant changes (knowledge, attitudes and behavior), increased coral
reef health, increased fish numbers/biomass/species richness, increased invertebrate numbers /species richness and fishers’, and
increased perceived fish catch.
The campaign will be successful if the live hard coral cover and fish density increase by 10 percent by July 2012 (compared to
baseline from May 2011). Shifts from negative attitudes that sees MPAs as a restriction on their livelihood and fishing shift to
perception of the MPA as a food security “bank of the sea” that brings benefits to the whole community and future generations in
the form of dividends of increased fish catch around the MPA.
8
3. Site summary
(This section corresponds to the site summary created during the first University Phase. Please revise it, noting that a few minor changes
have been made to the information required, and insert it here)
Project Name
Project Name
Uson Buang Pongco Bonga Fish Sanctuary and Marine Reserve
Project Data Effective Date
2011-06-12
Project Scope and Vision
Scope/Site Name
Bgy. Uson
Scope/Site Description
A 46.25-hectare “No Take Zone” in Bacacay, Albay established and supported by the Local Government Unit
in keeping with its being a DENR declared a Priority Marine Protection Area for its being a migratory path of
whalesharks,tuna, reef fishes, and other marine species.
Vision Statement Text
A model learning site that showcases the many different benefits of having a balanced coastal and marine
ecosystem that is well-managed by its stakeholders with institutionalized and functioning systems.
Biodiversity Features
Biodiversity Area
Biodiversity Background
Amount of hectares in site
Municipal waters: 165,000 has; coastline: 143 km; 45.63 NTZ; land
area of Municipality 616 has; area of MPA: 11,220 has; fishery reserve:
453.25 has
1. An overview of the area’s
1.Reef: 3 sites 38.8 % live coral cover having acropora and nonbiodiversity, including
acropora spp., presence of Halimeda spp. (algae); tridacna; seagrass
ecosystem types and an
and mangroves (no status assessment
estimate for species richness
for as many groups as
possible (refer to data from
9
similar sites where need be).
2. List any recent research on
the site’s biodiversity
(provide full references for
all work in last decade).
3. Provide a list of vegetation
types, including the main
types of woodland, grassland
and similar communities, and
cultivated land, indicating
whether any are of particular
conservation interest.
4. Provide a list of introduced
species. Where possible,
include English, local, and
scientific nomenclature, and
indicate whether the species
is causing any problems and
to what extent.
5. Provide information on other
species of special interest
(perhaps they are
taxonomically unique in
some way, are valuable for
medical or other purposes),
potential flagship species,
etc.
2. Fish census 9/25/01 by BFAR
Benthic lifeform assessment 9/25/01 by BFAR
3. Mangrove spp dominated by Bakauan spp (Rhizopora apiculata;
coconut, pandan spp locally called karagomoy
4. no noted introduced spp.
Labridae family are present in good quantity. Reef fishes also present.
They are important in aquarium fish trade
Biodiversity Features
Biodiversity Area
Amount of hectares in site
Municipal waters: 165,000 has; coastline: 143 km; 45.63 NTZ; land
area of Municipality 616 has; area of MPA: 11,220 has; fishery reserve:
453.25 has
Biodiversity Background
1. An overview of the area’s
1.Reef: 3 sites 38.8 % live coral cover having acropora and non-
10
2.
3.
4.
5.
biodiversity, including
ecosystem types and an
estimate for species richness
for as many groups as
possible (refer to data from
similar sites where need be).
List any recent research on
the site’s biodiversity
(provide full references for
all work in last decade).
Provide a list of vegetation
types, including the main
types of woodland, grassland
and similar communities, and
cultivated land, indicating
whether any are of particular
conservation interest.
Provide a list of introduced
species. Where possible,
include English, local, and
scientific nomenclature, and
indicate whether the species
is causing any problems and
to what extent.
Provide information on other
species of special interest
(perhaps they are
taxonomically unique in
some way, are valuable for
medical or other purposes),
potential flagship species,
etc.
acropora spp., presence of Halimeda spp. (algae); tridacna; seagrass
and mangroves (no status assessment
2. Fish census 9/25/01 by BFAR
Benthic lifeform assessment 9/25/01 by BFAR
3. Mangrove spp dominated by Bakauan spp (Rhizopora apiculata;
coconut, pandan spp locally called karagomoy
4. no noted introduced spp.
Labridae family are present in good quantity. Reef fishes also present.
They are important in aquarium fish trade
11
Protected Area Categories
What is the status of the protected
area? What are the main threats to
the area?
Declared FSMR Municipal Ordinance No. 107 s. 2002
Legal Status
Information about the various legal
statutes and regulations relevant to
your site and the wildlife that live
there.
Priority Marine Resources Conservation (having been part of Albay
Gulf) as declared by DENR in 1997 for reef fishes, whaleshark, tuna,
elasmobranchs
Legislative Context
List all the formal legal instruments
which relate to your site (“soft” and
“hard”): International Conventions
your country has signed on to,
special international designations it
might boast (e.g., a World Heritage
Site, Man and Biosphere Reserve),
any relevant national and local
conservation-related legislation, and
deeds of public/private ownership of
your site. As you do so, give them a
score from 1-5 according to how
effective you think they presently are
(with 1=not effective and 5=very
effective).
Physical Description
Description of the site; is it
mountainous, forested, coral reef,
etc. Topographical information of
the site. Climatic information of the
site.
Rolling and undulating terrain, Type II climate Rainy season from
October to January and dry season from February to September.
Average temperature is 22 degrees Celsius on rainy wet and 27.07
degrees Celsius on wet season.
Biological Description
Biological description of the site that
has not been discussed elsewhere
and that you want to have in your
reports.
Nine islets: Bogias, Pagliswican, Umagob, Masaginsin, Tumarab,
Langaton, and two islands in Namanday and CAGRARAY where the
MPA is located.
There are five mangrove species identified and existing in the
municipality. A total of 136.55 ha is devoted to aquaculture ponds.
Seagrass patches located in Uson and Tambilagao area. Algae and
seaweeds also present in Uson. Green algae locally known as lato are
1.
2.
3.
4.
Ramsar, IUCN, CBD, Coral triangle
RA 8550-Fisheries Code of the Philippines
Albay Provincial Environment Code of 2002
Ordinance No. 107 s 2002 by LGU Bacacay
12
found in Nahapunan, Bariw and Damacan, all of Sula Channel.
Eucheuma culture known as gulaman can be grown in Namanday,
Tambilagao, Cagbulacao, Busdac and Buang.
Fishery dependent population based on LGU existing data (2010). Mat weaving is an
alternative source of income. Average mat production is two mats per day per person
at 100 pesos per mat sold in the City of Tabaco. A laborer is paid some 250 pesos for
a day’s work. Deep sea fishers on the average get 10 kilos per fishing effort, shallow
water fishers get two kilos per fishing effort.
Socio-Economic
Information
Description of the economy at the
site. Make a list of all the living and
non-living resources that are
presently being extracted from your
site. Where possible, give some
measure of the value of these
products in local currency (per item,
kilo, bundle, etc.). As a way of
putting these numbers into a
meaningful context, indicate how
much a laborer would normally be
paid by the hour or for a day’s work.
Historical Description
Brief overview of the history of the It was founded in 1649. It was made into Protected Area in 2002. It was
site. Do other countries contest it?
not logged, original vegetation remains. No huge trees since upland is
Has it been logged? When was it
dependent on rain. Not farmed either.
made into a protected area? Was the
site once part of a colony?
Cultural Description
Description of the main cultural
groups at or near the site. What
religions are practiced? Are the
people a minority group within the
country? Are there any cultural
traditions that you need to know in
order to be able to work in the site,
for example, special holidays, or
beliefs about how the site should be
treated?
Access Information
Description of how to access the site Access is only by boat. Difficult to access during northeast monsoon.
(by boat only? By car using what
From Tabaco City there is daily trip to Uson at 12.00 noon. The boat
roads, etc). Give times when access leaves the next day for Tabaco City Port located in Bgy. San Roque.
Native Bicolanos who speak Bicol inhabit the area. Majority is Roman
Catholic. Feast Day is every August 16th.
13
is harder or easier due to things like
rainy season or winters.
Visitation Information
Details on what someone should
know in order to visit the site, for
example where they should originate
their trip, or who might rent them a
boat.
They must start trip from Legazpi City. They then must take a bus to
Tabaco City then form Tabaco City take a tricycle to Bgy San Roque
where the port to Uson is located. Chartered trips may be arranged with
Mike Basallote
Current Land Uses
Information about land tenure and
land use at the site.
Predominantly agricultural; Alienable and disposable with patches of
timberland along the villages outside the site e.g. Salvacion
Management Resources
Description of the management
structure, resources, organizations,
roles, and any other information
relevant to management of the site.
The Local Government Unit of Bacacay at the Municipal level assumes
over-all management on the FSMR. The Mayor is directly supported by
the Mun. Adricultural Officer-Pio Caneso who has oversight function
on the FSMR Management Council. The Management Council is
supported by four functional units: Fishery Law Enforcement Team,
Surveillance Team; Sanctuary Maintenance; and Monitoring and
Evaluation. The latter is manned by LGU, Bureau of Fisheries and
Aquatic Resources and other government entities like the DENR.
IUCN Red-list Species
Red-List Species
Enter the common and scientific
names of any species at your site
that are listed by IUCN Red Data
list and give a brief explanation of
why they are listed and what their
current status is.
Tridacna sp.- giant clam ( Critically endangered due to
overharvesting)
Chelonia mydas-Green sea turtles ( Endangered due to habitat
destruction; entangled in fish nets and hunted for meat)
Rhincodon typus- whaleshark (Endangered due to strandings)
Tuna spp.- threatened due to overharvesting or overfishing
Other Notable Species
Other Notable Species
Common and scientific names of
other important species at your site
Wrasse fish (“Mameng” in Filipino and “Bukhawon” in the MPA
village (subject to validation as to what particular species hence, no
14
such as endemic species, keystone
species, commercial species.
scientific name yet)
Pandan spp. Endemic to the site used for mat weaving
Location and Topography
13°13’-13° 22’
Project Latitude
The latitude of your project site
using numbers between -90 degrees
and 90 degrees.
Project Longitude
The longitude of your project site
123°42’-123°57’
using numbers between -180 degrees
and 180 degrees.
Country/Countries
The country/countries of your site.
States/Provinces
The name(s) of the states and/or
ALBAY
provinces where your site is located.
Municipalities
The name(s) of the
municipally/municipalities where
your site is located.
BACACAY
Legislative Districts
The name(s) of the legislative
districts where your site is located.
FIRST DISTRICT OF ALBAY
Location Details
A textual narrative about the
location.
Bacacay occupies the eastern slope of Mayon Volcano, in Southeast of
LUZON ISLANDS, PHILIPPINES descending to the lowlands facing
the Pacific Ocean. The town lies on the eastern part of the Province of
Albay and includes the island of Cagraray I, it is bounded on the north
by Tabaco Bay on the south by the Municipality of Sto. Domingo and
Albay Gulf; on the East by Lagonoy Gulf and on the West by the
Municipality of Malilipot.
Site Map Reference
Paste a GoogleMaps URL into this
box (http://maps.google.com/), by
locating your site on Google Maps,
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=
bacacay+albay+philippines&sll=37.0625,95.677068&sspn=23.542772,71.015625&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Baca
PHILIPPINES
15
then click “Link” to have the map of cay,+Albay,+Bicol+4509,+Philippines&t=h&z=11
your site referenced.
Comments
Any additional information about
Average fish catch per fishing effort of motorized outrigger boat: 10
your site’s location that has not been kilos
included above, but you think you
Average fish catch per fishing effort of non-motorized boat: 2 kilos
will need to be included in your site
summary.
Human Stakeholders
Human Stakeholder Population Total number of people who live within 3,036 individuals, 535 Households but total population of Albay Gulf
Size
the target site.
fishers:343,269 in 2007 from SUMACORE, Inc.
Social Context
Additional information on population, Albay Gulf: declared Priority Site for Marine Conservation by DENR in
including demographic, geographic, etc. 1997.
16
Stakeholder Matrix (Project Team)
Given
Name
Surname
Resource
ID
Organization
Position
Roles
Email
Phone
Given name
Surname
Initials or
nickname
Name of the
organization this
person works for
Job title or work
description (i.e.
fisher, stakeholder)
Team member,
project leader,
stakeholder,
project advisor,
etc.
Email
address
Cell and office
phone numbers
Eduardo
Castelo
Ed
MFARMC
Chair
Stakeholder
09128939583
Pio
Caneso
Pio
Mun. Agric. Office
Mun. Agriculturist
Project advisor
052-5583243
Danny
Barotilla
Danny
LGU-Pongco-Bonga
Bgy. Capt.
stakeholder
Gina
Bustamante
Gina
Buang
Buang
stakeholder
Manuel
Basallote
Manny
LGU-Uson
-do-
Team member
Maria
Lourdes
Achero
Malou
MAO-LGU Bacacay
Agric. Technician
Joselin
Marcus
Fragada
RED Marc
DENR V
RED- Regional
Executive Director
Supervisor
Felix
Mendoza
Felix
DENR PAWCZMS
V
Regional Technical
Director
-do-
Mafe
Reganit
Pot
-do-
Science Res.
Assistant
TWG DENR
member
Arnel
Boholst
Arnel
LGU Bacacay
President, MFAMMC
Bicol Region
Advisor
Fr. Efren
Bantog
Fr. Efren
SOLT-Bgy. Cabasan
Parish Priest
Myrna
Baylon
Mina
DENR PAWCZMS
Sr. EMS
09198686860
09166962307
TWG-DENR
member
redreg5@yah
oo.com
052-4820691
rtdfcmendoza 09175094970
@yahoo.com
053-4820269
17
Organization Matrix
Name
Role(s)
Given Name
Surname
Email
Phone
Name of organization
that may be involved or
integral to the success
of the Pride campaign
Role that this
organization might play
in the Pride campaign
Primary contact’s
given name
Primary
contact’s
surname
Email address
Cell and office
phone numbers
AKO Bicol Partylist
Legislation, lobbying in
Congress
Source of supplemental
funds for Barrier
Removal Strategies
Atty. Rodel
Atty. Pido
Christopher
Batocabe
Garbin
Co
www.akobicol.com
c/o Rey Kallos
09324359666
LGU-Provincial
Government of Albay
Source of fund;
legislation support and
tourism promotion
Gov. Joey
Salceda
www.albay.gov.ph
(052) 481 2555.
govoffice@albay.gov.ph  (052) 480
3444
Diocese of Legazpi
Barrier Removal Strategy Rev. Fr. Ramon
(Mat making and
“Fr. Monching”
Grameen banking)
Segubiense
sacleg@globalink.net.ph Phone: +63 52
8205302
+63 52 8205302
Telefax: +63
52 481-2384
Audience
Audiences
# of People in Audience
Short name for each target
audience
Target audience population
TA1-Fishers
Audience Summary
100
TA2-Organized community 100
18
Audiences
# of People in Audience
TA3- Coastal residents
1132
TA4- key LGU employees
10
Audience Summary
-
Threats
The IUCN Threats Classification Scheme http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes/threatsclassification-scheme-ver3
offers a hierarchical listing of the causes of species decline and gives the following major headings.
1 Residential
and Commercial
Development
1.1 Housing and Urban Areas
1.2 Commercial and Industrial Areas
1.3 Tourism and Recreation Areas
5 Biological Resource Use
5.1 Hunting and Trapping Terrestrial Animals
5.1.1 Intentional Mortality (Human Use)
5.1.2 Incidental or Accidental Mortality (bycatch)
5.1.3 Persecution/control
5.1.4 Motivation Unknown/Unrecorded
5.2 Gathering Terrestrial Plants
5.2.1 Intentional mortality (human use)
5.2.2 Incidental or accidental mortality (bycatch)
5.2.3 Persecution/control
5.2.4 Motivation Unknown/Unrecorded
5.3 Logging and Wood Harvesting
5.3.1 Intentional mortality (human use - subsistence/small scale)
5.3.2 Intentional mortality (human use - large scale)
5.3.3 Incidental or accidental mortality (bycatch - subsistence/small scale)
5.3.4 Incidental or accidental mortality (bycatch - large scale)
5.3.5 Motivation Unknown/Unrecorded
5.4 Fishing & harvesting aquatic resources
5.4.1 Intentional mortality (human use - subsistence/small scale)
5.4.2 Intentional mortality (human use - large scale)
5.4.3 Incidental or accidental mortality (bycatch - subsistence/small scale)
5.4.4 Incidental or accidental mortality (bycatch - large scale)
5.4.5 Persecution/control
5.4.6 Motivation Unknown/Unrecorded
9 Pollution
9.1 Domestic and Urban Waste Water
9.1.1 Sewage
9.1.2 Run-Off
9.1.3 Type Unknown/Unrecorded
9.2 Industrial and Military Effluents
9.2.1 Oil Spills
9.2.2 Seepage from Mining
9.2.3 Type Unknown/Unrecorded
9.3 Agricultural and Forestry Effluents
9.3.1 Nutrient loads
9.3.2 Soil erosion, sedimentation
9.3.3 Herbicides and pesticides
9.3.4 Type Unknown/Unrecorded
9.4 Garbage and Solid Waste
9.5Air-borne Pollutants
9.5.1 Acid Rain
9.5.2 Smog
9.5.3 Ozone
9.5.4 Type Unknown/Unrecorded
9.6 Excess Energy
9.6.1 Light pollution
9.6.2 Thermal pollution
9.6.3 Noise pollution
9.6.4 Type Unknown/Unrecorded
2 Agriculture and Aquaculture
6 Human Intrusions and Disturbance
10 Ecological Events
1.4 Annual and Perennial non-timber crops
1.4.1 Shifting agriculture
1.4.2 Small-holder farming
1.4.3 Agro-industry farming
1.4.4 Scale Unknown/Unrecorded
1.5 Wood & pulp plantations
1.5.1 Small-holder plantations
6.1 Recreational Activities
6.2 War, civil unrest and military exercises
6.3 Work & other activities
10.2 Volcanoes
10.2 Earthquakes/tsunamis
10.3 Avalanches/landslides
19
1.5.2 Agro-industry plantations
1.5.3 Scale Unknown/Unrecorded
1.6 Livestock farming & ranching
1.6.1 Nomadic grazing
1.6.2 Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming
1.6.3 Agro-industry grazing, ranching or farming
1.6.4 Scale Unknown/Unrecorded
1.7 Marine and Freshwater Aquaculture
1.7.1 Subsistence/artisinal aquaculture
1.7.2 Industrial aquaculture
1.7.3 Scale Unknown/Unrecorded
3 Energy Production and Mining
7 Natural System Modifications
3.1 Oil and Gas Drilling
3.2 3.2 Mining & quarrying
3.3 3.3 Renewable energy
7.1 Fire & fire suppression
7.1.1 Increase in fire frequency/intensity
7.1.2 Suppression in fire frequency/intensity
7.1.3 Trend Unknown/Unrecorded
7.2 Dams & water management/use
7.2.1 Abstraction of surface water (domestic use)
7.2.2 Abstraction of surface water (commercial use)
7.2.3 Abstraction of surface water (agricultural use)
7.2.4 Abstraction of surface water (unknown use)
7.2.5 Abstraction of ground water (domestic use)
7.2.6 Abstraction of ground water (commercial use)
7.2.7 Abstraction of ground water (agricultural use)
7.2.8 Abstraction of ground water (unknown use)
7.2.9 Small dams
7.2.10
Large dams
7.2.11
Dams (size unknown)
7.3 Other ecosystem modifications
4 Transportation and Service
Corridors
8 Invasive and Other Problematic Species and
Genes
4.1 Roads & railroads
4.2 Utility & service lines
4.3 Shipping lanes
4.4 Flight paths
8.1 Invasive non-native/alien species
8.1.1 Unspecified species
8.1.2 Named species
8.2 Problematic native species
8.3 Introduced genetic material
Key Biodiversity
Targets
Direct Threats
Use the full IUCN classifications
above to make a list of all the
threats you consider the most
important to your site and to any
notable species within it.
Tourism and recreation area
Severity
Rate the relative severity
of each threat on a scale of
1-4, where 1=low,
2=medium, 3=high, 4
=very high.
2
11 Climate Change and Severe
Weather
11.1 Habitat shifting and Alteration
11.2 Droughts
11.3 Temperature extremes
11.4 Storms and Flooding
11.5 Other impacts
12 Unknown
Acanthaster plancii crown of
thorns predator of reef
Contributing factors [including indirect
threats]
Misibis Resort on the other end of the island.
Pressure on the reef
20
Soil erosion and sedimentation
storms and flooding
Acanthaster plancii (CoT)
Fishing and harvesting aquatic
resources
Fishing & harvesting aquatic
resources
2
Shifting agriculture
Climate Change
2
Rise in population due to erratic weather patterns
3
Weak law enforcement in other areas
4
High market demand for fish products
Increased number of fishers and human population
dependent on fishing as a source of income, and
sustenance.
Source of information:
Municipal Agriculture Office, Municipality of Bacacay, Albay and Bgy. Capt. Manuel Basallote, LGU Bgy Uson, Bacacay, Albay
B. SOCIAL MARKETING PROFILE
The planning work conducted was ground-truthed with a range of key stakeholders and experts through stakeholder meetings, focus
group discussions and one-on-one interviews. These helped to build a composite portrait of the campaign target audiences, and design
the quantitative survey (Section B4 and Appendix H) which was subsequently carried out across the campaign target area. The
quantitative survey will both help us understand our primary audiences and allow us to establish a baseline for measuring change after
the Pride campaign.
The formative research section below aims to provide a record of all qualitative research conducted, people spoken to and key outputs.
The sequences in which the results of the formative research are presented here do not necessarily correspond to the chronology in
which the data was collected, and in some cases, multiple iterations of the research, such as directed conversations with target
audiences, were required.
21
1. Formative research
1. NAME: LARRY BARRAMEDA
OCCUPATION: FISH BOAT OPERATOR AND BARANGAY COUNCIL MEMBER (USON)
GIST OF DISCUSSION: Larry is not dependent on fishing. It is his secondary source of income. But to the fishers using his
boat, fishing is their primary source of income. He has seen how fish catch has declined through the years. He ran for a position in
the Council thinking he could help other fishers find ways to make ends meet. At the PCRA, he learned the interconnectivity of
the ecosystems and is so interested at developing a tour package in the village. He said he realized how important it is to develop
and protect the mangroves, seagrass and coral reefs so people could come and learn from them. He also talked about developing
food stations where people could come and eat fresh seafood or simply tour around the mangroves. He is interested in sponsoring
an ordinance that would put money in erecting board walks and signages. He finished Hotel and Restaurant Management so he
sees himself managing a restaurant in the village in the coming years. He was so drawn to the benefits of the sea that he
volunteered to take the students to neighboring villages for the KAP survey.
Kagawad Larry Barrameda ( center wearing white shirt and white cap) with some of his colleagues at the Council and local village police who kept watch over the student-enumerators
during the KAP survey.He receives honorarium amounting to 250 pesos from the Bicol University during the awards night in Uson. The honorarium was a surprise to him and to the other
village officials who facilitated the activity. He explainins the resource map of Uson that he and his groupmates have drawn at the PCRA.
22
2. NAME: Franscisco Balingbing
OCCUPATION: Fisher
GIST OF DISCUSSION: He has expressed optimism that the new leadership of Mayor Betito will continue to support what
they have established in 2001. He has noted however, the decrease in logistics support from the Municipal LGU. He noted
some mismanagement in the Sanctuary and noted increased violations over the last five years. He continues to fish for a
living and would be interested to volunteer again should he see any concrete steps and enabling mechanisms for fishers to
be actively involved in MPA management.
3. NAME: LORENZO BARBACENA
OCCUPATION: Fisher
GIST OF DISCUSSION:
Mr. Barbacena is very passionate about the sea. He has seen how the local fishery resource fed and sustained the lives of
the villagers. He has seen the wrath of typhoons and the bounty of the sea. He is an active member of the core group that
established the fish sanctuary. He is well respected in the village and is quick to relate the sea with the Church doctrine of
creation and dominion. He admitted having used dynamite before because in the old days it was popular and people really
needed to use dynamite to catch too many schools of fish. He later learned the disadvantage of dynamite fishing and of
using efficient fishery implements when fish catch declined. He expressed hope for the sea. He welcomes people who
come to their village to help the locals and those who want to enjoy the beauty of nature that are under their stewardship.
(L-R) Mr. Balingbing and son being interviewed during the KAP survey. Mr. Barbacena (leftmost) with his groupmates at the recently held PCRA.
23
Eduardo Castelo, MFARMC Chair
“The Municipal Ordinance of the MPA was adapted from the Philippine Fisheries Code ( RA 8550). He said that there are policies to
protect the marine resources of Bacacay. They Organized a “Bantay Dagat” team to secure the protection of the marine resources. He
also said that some fishing activities are destructive for the marine habitat. He cited “tanking tamba” as an example. They also conduct
patrolling through deputized Bantay Dagat in the barangay. He also stated that the process of enforcement starts with the information
dissemination to the residents and fishers regarding ordinances being implemented. If problems or violations like illegal fishing occur,
the local police would take appropriate action. There are also consultations for the fishers regarding the fishing ordinance. Member of the
MFARMC coordinated with each other to manage the implementation of the policy and to maintain the proper implementation for the
whole barangay.”
Arnel Boholst, Regional Fisherfolk representative; MFARMC Chair 1998 to 2009. He said that the FLET of Bacacay implements the
Fishery Rules and Regulations within the municipal waters. This enforcement team is also in charge of the proper dissemination of
information regarding the rules and regulations they implement. Members of MFARMC cooperate in the implementation of policies.
They give “humanitarian consideration” to those who have committed the offense for the first time. Those who committed serious
offenses are put to jail.
Lourdes Cerillo, Secretary of MFARMC.She took part in clean up drives and she just replaced Rosalinda Baron, former secretary who
died. She admitted not to know too much about MFARMC.
Rodrigo Borromeo, Auditor, MFARMC considers having a fish sanctuary in Bacacay Albay a privilege. They said to have worked hard
to prohibit illegal activities. They coordinate with fishers and police force to introduce the programs to minimize illegal fishing.
Alberto Baron, member of MFARMC, Roberto Beatriz and Rolando Bibon said they are focusing on cleaning the sea from solid
waste.They said they warn the violators upon committing first offense. They said they anticipate conflicts since the violators are insistent
that they catch fish using illegal methods. According to Ramiro Bartumen, MFARMC member, they give nets to deserving fishers.
Edgardo Baron, MFARMC member said they coordinate with the residents to implement fishery policies. They encourage people to have
alternative sources of income so they will not abuse the marine resources. In cases of violations, imprisonment and penalties are likely
the consequences.
Outputs from the consensus workshop and vote on benefits from the MPA at your TWG and stakeholder meeting.
Further you can include here:
- Outputs from Focus Group Discussions
24
- Photo voice
- Any other relevant qualitative research
As a guide you can also reference the Formative research and directed conversations section E p 38 to 43 in Lola)
2. Concept Model
All Rare Pride campaigns start with building a concept model, which is a tool for visually depicting the situation at the project
site. Through validation with several stakeholders and marine experts Stuart Green, Pablo Roxas and MERF Marine Scientists.
The following concept model was developed illustrating the conservation target, indirect threats and contributing factors at
Uson Buang Pongco Bonga. The model was created using the Miradi software. Miradi is being developed to assist conservation
practitioners going through the adaptive management process outlined in the Conservation Measures Partnership's Open
Standards for the Practice of Conservation (www.miradi.org). It entails a standardized nomenclature and threat taxonomy
developed by the IUCN. The following chart is what the Uson MPA concept model looks like once all of the direct and
contributing factors to the Uson MPA have been inputted. The connecting arrows highlight the relationship between the factors
and how they impact different targets in the Uson Buang Pongco Bonga MPA NTZ.
25
26
3. Results Chain
Results chains clearly and concisely lay out the expected sequence of results that the campaign is expected to create all along
our Theory of Change for each of our target audiences. It is generally recognized that before adopting a new behavior a person
moves through a series of stages. These stages can be summarized as pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, validation,
action, and maintenance. Not all individuals in a target segment will be in the same stage of behavior change, so activities and
messages will need to be tailored to the different stages at which the target audiences are. Understanding the steps in our
results chain has also helped narrow down our preliminary objectives for each target audience before we begin collecting data.
The campaign’s proposed approach can be represented as three results chain, two for the primary audience to be targeted
(fishers and community from Uson, Buana and Pongco-Bonga) and a further one for community representatives that will
become part of the Managament Committee (secondary TA)
27
28
The basis for building the above results chains was the concept model illustrated in section B2 as well as the threat
ranking and factor chains included that were subsequently developed in consultation with partners and stakeholders (
see Appendix H7 and H8). The threat ranking helped identify the priority threat to be addressed by the campaign, based
on scope, severity and irreversibility of the threat at the site. The factor chains subsequently served to illustrate the
causal sequence of factors that lie behind the primary threat and the target groups that the campaign needs to reach to
address the threat. The result chains illustrate the results required to achieve the campaign’s desired goals and aim to
constitute a road map for changes the campaign would like to bring about for each target audience. The result chains
were also used as a foundation for developing the campaign quantitative survey and obtaining the information1 that
would be required to design effective social marketing and behavior change interventions for the campaign.
29
4. Establishing a Baseline: Quantitative survey
After conducting qualitative research the LAP conducted a quantitative survey of adults living in XXX. This pre-campaign survey was
conducted in March 2010 to gain a better understanding of the knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of the target audiences in
relation to the MPA and desired behavior changes as well as to establish a baseline for measuring the impact of the campaign on these
audiences through the campaign. The results from the KAP survey are the basis for the creation of SMART objectives relating to the
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) components of the campaign’s Theory-of-Change (ToC).
A second post campaign survey will be conducted at the end of one year of the campaign activities being implemented in May 2009 to
measure any change in these KAP variables in order to assess the level of attainment of the SMART objectives. A full description of the
results can be found in the Project Plan Appendix F4.
The following table summarizes the number of people interviewed and the geographical distribution of the survey.
Geographic scope of survey
Fig. __ Satellite photos of the villages covered by the MPA (Red box shows the no take zone (not on scale)
30
Survey target audiences and sample size
N of people
TA 1 primary
(fishers in three -Uson; Buang, Pongco-Bonga
villages 100)-no intrusion, intelligence, sustain
support)
TA 2 (organized groups -100 BFARMC, MFARMC,
BDC, ManCom)- active management
TA 3 primary (406-Uson; 726 from Buang, PongcoBonga)Community within the three villages covered
by the FSMR (MPA)- passing intelligence,
participation in FSMR management )
TA 4 KEY LGU employees- (Budget, Planning and
Devt., PNP Chief, DILG officer, Gen Services Chief, AT
(3) Mayor and Vice Mayor- reinforce policy support
to Uson FSMR
Total
Sample size at
95%CL and
3%CI
92
Sample size at
95%CL and
5%CI
80
Final sample
size choice
92
80
92
1132
243
10
243-Uson
328Buang.PongocBonga
=571
10
1326
741
427
92
10
31
Sampling methodology
TA1
Fishers in three
villages
TA2 –organized groups
(BFARMC, MFARMC,
ManCom)
TA3 – Communities within
the coastal villages
TA4- LGU key people
N of TA
in
locality
Stratified sampling
Geographic
scope of
survey
N of
people
in listed
locality
N of
TA in
localit
y
% of
total
TA in
localit
y
sampl
e size
for TA
in
localit
y
N of TA
in
locality
% of
total TA
in
locality
sample
size for TA
in locality
N of TA
in
locality
Barangay 1 –
Uson
659
40
-
40
40
-
40
120
243
Barangay 2Buang and
Pongco
LGU
TOTAL
1317+
931=
2248
60
-
60
60
-
60
724
152
100
100
100
1132
10
10
Random sampling will be carried
out by dividing the area into
grids for random site selection.
Since the households are spaced
sporadically, then the
enumerators could determine
by judgment which households
to choose and would take note
of those who refuse to
cooperate with the
enumerators.
Total enumeration of identified
respondents.
2,907
Respondent selection
method
(This should be written in
such a way that someone
trying to replicate the
survey has enough
information to be able to
use the same method)
100
1132
Fifteen enumerators will
be tasked to interview
fishermen in the two sites.
One group composed of
seven will take charge in
interviewing TA 1 while
the other group composed
of 8 members will be
tasked to cover TA 2 sites.
The upper left portion of
each set of questionnaires
will be marked for an
enumerator to distinguish
which form goes to what
group of interviewees.
Same grouping of enumerators
will be tasked to interview two
sites. There will be total
enumeration of interviewees so
that all 100 of them will be
included in the sample size.
% of
total TA
in
locality
sample
size for
TA in
locality
% of
toal TA
in
locality
Sample
size for
TA in
locality
10
32
Survey planning
Total survey sample size
Time for enumerator to do one survey
427
0.5 hr
N of hrs enumerator works a day
N of surveys one enumerator can do a day
N of enumerators available
5 hrs
8
57
N of surveys done a day by total n of enumerators
N of days needed to do survey
427
Additional days needed for travel if any
Dates for training of enumerators & final survey testing
2
April 12, 2011
Beginning and end date of survey
N of people available to do data entry
April 27-29, 2011
2
Beginning date of data entry
May 4, 2011
Date of completion of data entry
May 25, 2011
1
33
5. Understanding our audience
TA1 - PRIMARY AUDIENCE – FISHERS ( N= 100)
What do we know
about this group?
THE TARGET AUDIENCE 1 IS IN THE CONTEMPLATION STAGE. By definition, this means that the fishers are
aware of the proposition but ambivalent about changing. During this stage they assess barriers ( time,
expense, hassle, fear) as well as the benefits of change.
42 percent of the fishers live in Uson, while 51 percent in other areas within the municipality of Bacacay while
some 7 percent live in other municipalities. Some 19 percent of the fishers were aged 55 or older and 18 percent
were aged 35-39. Some 42.6 percent have attained some or all secondary education while 41 percent achieved
some or all intermediate education. Majority (97 percent) was Roman Catholics, most or 71 percent were male.
Some 62 percent considered fishing as primary source of income. The average number of people living in their
household was between 2-6 with 78 percent. More than half or 62.4 percent lived within the annual income of
30,000 pesos or below while half or 52.8 percent of the fishers used nets or what is locally known as “hikot”.
83 percent can list the benefits of the NTZ.
Knowledge
Some 70 percent of the fishers agreed that the local fishers regularly participate in the management decisions of
the NTZ.
Some 69 percent of the fishers know who to report to in cases when there is intrusion. 4 percent of the fishers
often follow the regulations of the NTZ.
36 percent of the fishers think it is easy to report violations of rules and regulations such as intursion to NTZ.
Attitude
Practice
Some 82.9 percent of the fishers listed at least one benefit of having a No Take Zone. Some 69 percent said
violations and intrusions must be reported to local police, local law enforcers or village heads. Some 51 percent
said the local community benefits from having a NTZ nearby.
Their attitude towards the MPA as it relates with fish catch is that MPA caused decreased in their yield. Results
showed that some 44.8 percent of the fishers believed that fish has decreased as a result of MPA establishment.
Some 89.8 percent strongly agreed or agreed on the fact that the fishers know the boundaries of the NTZ.
Some 66 percent concurred that no one can collect shells or fish inside the Fish Sanctuary. Preferred radio
station was Bombo Radyo at 36.4 percent followed by DZGB at 23.9 percent. 73 percent of fishers have not
34
discussed with each other regarding the consequences of breaking the rule on MPA
Their top three trusted sources of information on the environment were as follows: religious leaders (19.6
percent); TV person ad DENR (both at 14.1 percent); and person on radio at 6.5 percent.
It is noteworthy that 14.4 percent do not listen to radio
Trusted sources
Media sources
Any other relevant
information
Comments
The fishers primarily trust family and friends as source of information (96. 8 percent); followed by public meeting
(96.6 percent); Television (92.7 percent); DENR (92.5 %) and local leaders and teachers (both at 91.3 percent)
The top three choices for flagship species include: lobster (55 percent) snapper (45.7 percent) and sea turtles (34
percent). The three ways by which fishers believe they would be affected by climate change were: increased
water temperature leading to death of corals and less fish (45 percent); sea level rise
( 33 percent and increased typhoon strength less reliable work and crops (31 percent).
There are media resources available such as a port area where people aggregate in Buang, a concentration of
school building, bgy hall and daycare center in Uson and a port area in Pongco Bonga.
TA2 - SECONDARY AUDIENCE – Organized groups in the community (N=100)
What do we
know about
this group?
THE TARGET AUDIENCE 2 ARE IN THE CONTEMPLATION STAGE. Like the target audience 1 (fishers), this implies that
the members of the organized groups are aware that there is a problem in their behavior as regards their attendance
to meeting regarding the NTZ and the UBPBFSMR upkeep in general, in the last six months but are ambivalent in
changing.
Half or 55.6 percent of the organized groups said fish catch stayed the same despite the presence of the MPA.
Knowledge
67 percent of the organized community members saw benefits of having a NTZ in the vicinity. Also, 91.7 % has
knowledge of the boundaries of the NTZ. Some 75 percent of them said no one can collect shells or fish inside the
UBPBFSMR.
56 percent know who to report intrusions to.
Attitude
46 percent of the organized groups says it is easy to attend at least six meetings of the UPBBFSMR mgt. committee
in 12 months; Also, 90.9 percent said they support or strongly support for increasing the enforcement of rules of the
MPA.
35
39 percent of the organized community will entrust the leadership of UBPBFSMR to community members and local
village officials.
Practice
64 percent of the organized community said they have not talked to anyone about their role in managing the MPA.
39 percent of fishers and local leaders are most involved in decision making in the NTZ the past 6 months.
Target audience 2 listed radio, law enforcement official and television as trusted sources of information.
Trusted
sources
Media
sources
Any other
relevant
information
58.3% of this target group sampled in the campaign’s questionnaire survey preferred news as media
format . 23% listened to the radio daily (6.00 am to 2.00 pm being preferred listening times); 54.5% do not
read the newspaper. Preferred media format was video at 30.8 percent however, drama, comedy, puppet
show were less liked.
The residents are sporadically located in the three villages hence, the use of media resources such as presence of
barangay hall, port area and docking area of fishers could help achieve goals for KAIC.
Majority or 61 percent believed they will be affected by typhoon strength and less reliable work and crops followed by
increase in typhoon frequency (54 percent) and sea level rise.
Comments
TA3 - PRIMARY AUDIENCE – COASTAL RESIDENTS (N=1132)
What do we
know about
this group?
Knowledge
The behavior stage of TA 3 is consistent with those of the other two target audiences- contemplation. Half or 45.4
percent some or all secondary completed; 97 percent are Catholics. Mat making is the source of income at 28.27
percent followed by agriculture at 19.6 percent and fishing at 18.90 percent.
65 percent of the residents are aware of the benefits and regulations of their NTZ and know who to report to in case
of intrusion is high at 78.8 percent
Communities have increased level of support in the enforcement of regulations in the MPA is 63.8 percent.
Attitude
64 percent of the organized community said they have not talked to anyone about their role in managing the MPA
36
Only 3.1 percent have reported two or more intrusions in the MPA to the enforcement team in the last 6 months
Practice
Trusted
sources
Media
sources
Any other
relevant
information
Comments
DENR is considered most trustworthy at 35 percent; followed by law enforcement officials, local government
environment officials, person on radio and person on television.
Primetime Bida or a series of television soaps account for the most preferred medium at 17.2 percent followed by
news at 13.8 percent; books and documentary show are least preferred.
The residents considered increase in water temperature leading to death of corals and less fish as the leading manner
by which they could be affected by climate change followed by increase in typhoon strength less reliable work and
crops and sea level rise. Snapper is the most popular creature followed by lobster and sea turtle.
TA4 - SECONDARY AUDIENCE – LGU (data from quantitative and qualitative research conducted for this campaign, see Appendix H4
This group make up for a small number of innovators but are crucial in sustaining the gains of social marketing in the
What do we
sense that they determine priorities for fund allocation. They review policy agenda and could spell the difference in
know about
implementation in the succeesing years after the social marketing campaign is done.
this group?
Knowledge
Attitude
Practice
Some 100 percent listed local police, local enforcers and village head as persons to report to in case there is intrusion.
They registered the highest value for knowledge among the four target audiences hence only the KAIC were given
attention in terms of behavior change. They will be made aware of he MPA structures, levels of authority and
corresponding functions, duties and responsibilities in achieving goals for the MPA
Performs their role in providing CRM services in the 36 coastal barangays including MPA management in Uson Buang
Pongco Bonga
Half ot the target audience 4 have talked to local government environment officials about their role in reporting
intrusions.
Not prioritized
Trusted
sources
37
Not prioritized
Media
sources
Any other
relevant
information
Comments
Not prioritized
90
80
70
60
Frequency count
50
TA 1
40
TA2
30
20
10
0
K
A
IC
BC
Fig. ___ Comparison between TA 1 and TA 2 as regards stage of behavior.
The figure evidently shows that both target audiences are in the contemplation stage of behavior change since the levels are above
75 percent. There is so much work to do in terms of , encouraging conversations along the topic on regulation, intrusion in the MPA and
the benefits they could get out of a well- protected MPA.
38
39
C. MPA Governance and Management plan (BROP)
Abstract
Marine Protected Areas are suggested as the most effective tool in fisheries management. They serve as safe
haven for fish, invertebrates, and corals to breed and grow to improve fish biomass, abundance, diversity, and
improve reef habitats. The Uson Buang Pongco Bonga Fish Sanctuary and Marine Reserve has been established
over the last 10 years through the Municipal Ordinance No. 93 Series of 2001. This ordinance describes rules and
regulations in the no take zone, penalties per violation, definition of boundaries, and a management body
designated to oversee and perform day to day activities. A management plan was drafted and adopted to describe
the major strategies and activities that the management will follow. However, over the years, the management
performance was rated “PASSING” based on recent MPA rating and is still at level “1” [initiated]. The management
body or Management Committee (ManCom)] acknowledged this rating during the organizational development
workshops. This can be attributed to the lack of support of department heads and line agencies, poor
implementation of action plan and undefined functions of the management body. These resulted to increasing
intrusion and weak enforcement continuum [PCRA].
Likewise, KAP revealed that very few individuals knew
about the NTZ and its boundaries and while some are knowledgeable, they don’t take any responsibility or action
to help manage the MPA. In terms of biophysical status, Uson NTZ has no updated coral reef data to speak of.
In Uson NTZ, poor governance and poor implementation of enforcement continuum calls for improvement through well
thought off strategies within the protected area taking into account community participation in the process. The
diagnostic process [PCRA, MPA rating, OD]- had been instrumental in identifying such issues thereby used as basis in
crafting this MPA Governance and Management Plan to improve governance, enforcement and community buy-in. This
MPA-GMP will be carried out by the MPA Management Body [TWG and ManCom] within the timeframe July 2011-July
2012 ( assuming reef data is made available the soonest they could conduct the assessment and will be assessed
regularly during meetings. This MPA-GMP will be supported by funding opportunities from various sources such as the
Municipal CRM budget, Line Agencies, NGOs, trust fund set up for the Reef and Small Grants from prospective local
organizations.
1. Introduction
This section should focus on why the plan delves into governance and enforcement and how it fits into the overall campaign strategy
40
The Philippines ranked first with the most number of MPAs in the world. About 25% of the worlds MPAs are found in
the Philippines. However, 15% of these MPAs are expected to be decimated on an annual basis due to poor
governance and weak enforcement (Aliňo 1998). In fact, during the Rare-initiated workshop in Cebu, on February
2010, these 2 issues surfaced as the most pressing compared to pollution, sedimentation, land-use issues, and climate
change. This workshop was attended by scholars and experts in their fields in the Philippines.
Governance refers to the clarity of processes in selecting leaders to manage the MPA and enforcement [a subset of
governance] refer to the capacity and availability of logistics to perform such roles that involves the entire continuum
such as deterrence, apprehension, case filing and decision. The poor selection of leaders and weak capacity to enforce
MPA boundaries and policies will result in the lack of community buy-in to support leaders and projects, unregulated
unsustainable fishing activities inside MPAs, and unpopular MPA boundaries and ownership. Subsequently, MPA
benefits are not maximized and the community will lose pride over the local MPA.
The Rare Pride Campaign is geared towards changing the behaviour of local fishers and community in order to stop
intrusions into the MPA and gain greater community buy-in for improved MPA governance and enforcement. The
current plan seeks to strengthen the structures and processes supporting the MPA management and enforcement so
that the fishers and community are able to embrace these behaviour changes and take ownership of the MPA and the
benefits that it can provide.
2. Objectives and scope
1. To improve MPA enforcement processes by November 2011 [i.e. upgraded guardhouse, enforcement,
protocols/plans, intelligence network and communication, logbook system]
2. To improve MPA governance system by November 2011 [i.e. regular meeting, increase membership,
documentation, management planning, evaluation, monitoring team]
3. Improve MPA effectiveness rating to level 3 [enforced] by June 2012
4. Tools
Tools employed included Participatory Coastal Resource Assessment (PCRA) tools; an MPA effectiveness rating workshop and a
Technical Working Group (TWG) and Management Committee (ManCom) Organizational Development ( OD) and planning workshops
Three participatory assessment methods were used to assess current status of fisheries, management performance
and community knowledge and practices namely Participatory Coastal Resource Assessment (PCRA), TWG and
ManCom OD and planning workshops and KAP survey.
41
1. The PCRA is a critical assessment tool that takes into account the community as the main source of
information and data gatherers. It has been widely used in the Philippines since the birth of
community-based resource management projects in over 3 decades now. This tool generated a whole
suite of focused group discussions [FGDs] not limited to fishery enforcement, resource map, MPA
history and etc. The objective of which is to improve community buy-in right at start of project and
understand the fishery status in the locality.
2. The MPA effectiveness rating system is a self-assessment tool initiated by CCEF and modified by
EcoGov to determine management performance of MPA. It is a system that came about to address the
need to improve the overall quality of management-since most MPA face difficulty in enforcement due
to poverty and general lack of awareness about the coastal environment. This rating was administered
on June 3-4, 2011 with the newly reconstituted MPA management body [TWG and ManCom]. This tool
generated conclusions on management status and management focus, collated documents supporting
rating, and basis for planning.
3. Organizational development is a conceptual, organization-wide effort to increase an organizations
effectiveness and viability through an external facilitator. In our case, we employed OD to assess the
local organizations i.e. the TWG and ManCom vis- a vis MPA management on separate dates. These
workshops generated action plan focusing on improving organizational performance and strengthening
for improve MPA governance and enforcement.
42
5. MPA profile
Table_._: Result of the MPA Enforcement FGD
Year
Year 1
(After MPA
establishme
nt)
Year 2
Number
of
infringe
ment
4
Types/forms
of
infringement
/gears used
Cyanide and
compressor
Intruders
(from where,
who, age
group)
Mostly old
fisherfolks; no
further details
Course/s of action taken
(apprehension, affidavit
writing, litigation,
imprisonment)
1 apprehension; no further
action taken
Forms of
incentives/disincentives
15
Cyanide and
compressor,
net
Cyanide and
compressor,
net
Cyanide and
compressor,
net
Cyanide and
compressor,
net
Cyanide and
compressor,
net
Mostly old
fisherfolks; no
further details
Mostly old
fisherfolks; no
further details
Mostly old
fisherfolks; no
further details
Mostly old
fisherfolks; no
further details
Mostly old
fisherfolks; no
further details
1 apprehension; no further
action taken; patrol boat not
functioning
No further action; marker
buoys lost
None
1 apprehension; no further
action taken; patrol boat
and marker buoys issues
No further action
None
1 apprehension; no further
action taken; dismissed due
to lack of technical support
(GPS)
None
Year 3
26
Year 4
31
Year 5
46
Year 6
75
None
None
None
MPA history, resource use and enforcement
Include a digitized resource map, outputs from FGD on enforcement and MPA history. Discuss any results of other PCRA tools-if
necessary and
reference the H9 “fisheries profile” where all results from the PCRA are summarized.
1. PCRA
a. FGD on enforcement
b. FGD on MPA Management History [use formative research results during pre 1st university
phase]
43
History of the Management of Marine Resources
Year (s)
Project or event
Goals
Responsible
Implementing
Agency
LGU
Outcome
Bgy. Res.
No.7 s. 1999
Public
Perception of
Project or
Event
1999
The villagers of Uson
proposed a fish
sanctuary
Protect coral
reefs
2000
Assessment
To determine
existing coastal
resources
FRMP project
of BFAR
To include
the bgys of
Buang and
PongcoBonga
2001
FSMR Orientation
Workshop
To establish
FSMR
FRMP, LGU
TWG formed
2003
Markers installed
To indicate the
boundaries of
no take zone
LGU
Initially it
served its
purpose to
determine the
boundaries.
At first, it was
accepted but
later it was
destroyed by
unidentified
fishers.
2007
Sumacore, a Spanishgovernment funded
project operated in
Bacacay, Albay
To do CRM
BFAR, LGU
Livelihood
component
was realized
and so were
the funding
support for
the
procurement
of buoys
They were
well accepted.
Notes
FS only
existed on
paper
No development to
establish FSMR on
site
Polarized
community
CRM component
PCRA. CO-IEC in
4 bgys.
1st TWG July 27,
2001
Aug. 7, 2001
planning
Aug. 22, 2001
Buang Public
hearing
44
2009
Rare Pride
Coordination
2010
Buoys were installed
To promote No
take zone
boundary
identification
Sumacore and
BFAR
Improved
patrolling
positive
MPA History
Table.__ History on MPA enforcement
Year
2002(After
MPA
establishment
)
Year 2003
Number of
infringement
Types/forms of
infringement/g
ears used
Intruders
(from where,
who, age
group)
Course/s of action
taken (apprehension,
affidavit writing,
litigation,
imprisonment)
Forms of
incentives/
disincentives
Meron pero hinid
nahuli
-do-
Year 2004
-do-
Year 2005
-do-
Year 2006
do-
Year 2007
4-5 persons
Pag bomba
Buang, Salvacion
30-40
Bacacay PNP
Kulong maghapon
Year 2008
7 persons
compressor
San Roque Tabaco
17-20
Bacacay Police Station
No incentive
Year 2009
2-3 persons
Pangke sa may
sanctuary
Cabasan, Buang,
Uson
Turn over Bacacay PNP
Wara insentibo,
Kinasuhan (naalop) o
pinatawad
45
c. Threats and management challenges of the MPA
Table _._
Hard enforcement
1. Irregular operation
of enforcement
team / bantay dagat
2. Use of cyanide and
compressor fishing
3. Dynamite fishing
operations
Soft enforcement
1. Lack maintenance
plan for marker
buoys
2. Lack maintenance
plan for guardhouse
3. Absence of bulletin
board, signboards
and marker
4. Lack of
communication
facilities– handheld
radio
5. Lack pumpboat and
maintenance plan
Management Body
1. Issues among
members
2. Lack of understanding
on roles and functions
3. Some member
discretely allow
intruders
4. Attendance during
meetings
5. TWG and ManCom
are not fully
operational due to
lack of updated
mandate such as EO
or SB Resolution
Table
Name
. Technical Working Group Composition
Office and
Contact
Position
Pio Caneso
MAO LGU
Ma. Lourdes Achero
AT, LGU
Eduardo Castelo
MFARMC Chair
Reynaldo Agaser
MENRO Designate
Table _._. Management Committee Composition and Functions
Commitees
Lead person
Composition in the
Functions
Responsibilities
Oversees FRM
Assits the MAO
Policy making
Mun. FLET
46
[Barangay MC]
Manuel Basallote
Barangay
Fishwardens [6], tanod
[6]
Biophysical
monitoring [corals,
fish, invertebrates]
IEC
PB Salvacion
Buarao
FLET Municipal level
led by Rey Agaser
Kag. Larry
Barrameda
PTA Officers [],
Barangay Officials [],
TWG
Financing
CF Ruby
Mendones
(Mayor Tobias Betito
Enforcement
[patrol]
[1] Logbook maintenance [2] Manage
Actual Score divided by
rotation/schedule [3] Ensure that there is enough
Total Available Points
logistics for the team [4] Coordinate with the local
government officials re. surveillance and passing
intelligence [5] systematizing patrolling [6] maintain
buoys and billboard
[1] Pagkuha ug datos [tinuig] [2] Pag analyze sa datos
[3] Pagsulat sa manila paper aron mabasa sa tanan
[4] Pagsulat
[1] Pagandam ug informasyon [2] Pagpahigayon ug
mga edukasyon activities [3] Pagorganize/pagfacilitate sa study tour o bisita
Make Trust fund actively support the activities of the
ManCom
Marine Protected Area Effectiveness Rating
Management Focus
Management Plan
Management Body
Legal Instrument and support
Community Participation
Financing
IEC
Enforcement
Monitoring and evaluation
Maintenance of infrastructure and
site development
Relevant indicators
4, 10, 27, 38, 39
5, 11, 20, 29,32, 40
6, 9, 37, 41
1, 3, 8
12, 19, 28, 35, 49
7, 14, 23, 44, 45, 46
13, 15, 21, 25, 26, 30, 36
2, 18, 24, 33, 34, 42, 43
16, 17, 22, 31, 47, 48
Total
Available
points
9
10
6
7
7
12
19
9
6
Actual Score
per
Management
Focus
1
1
5
7
3
0
7
2
11.1%
10.0%
83.3%
100.0%
42.9%
0.0%
36.8%
22.2%
2
33.3%
85
1. TWG and ManCom VM and composition, EO reference
47
Vision: A premier tourist destination with law-abiding, participative and God-loving citizenry who lived
in a ecologically balanced environment and a progressive
and sustainable economy under a shared, transparent and virtuos leadership.
Mission: to promote economic growth and well-being of the people through the effective delivert of
basic services, sustainable resource
generation and utilization, livelihood opportunities, agri-business and eco-tourism programs.
Technical Working Group of the Municipality was reorganized from its 2002 formation. New members included technical staff
from DENR Regional Office who were all from the Protected Areas Wildlife and Coastal Zone Office under the CF’s supervisor,
Director Felix Mendoza of DENR Regional Office No. 5. During the OD workshop, it was agreed that new members be added in
the group those coming from DILG, PNP and MPDC. To date, the TWG have had some five meetings since the Rare Pride
Campaign started its mobilization activities. The SB Resolution that will reconstitute the TWG, define its function and set its
direction is yet to be approved.
The ManCom was revived through the recent effectivenss rating workshop held iin Uson. Old Mancom members who were also
active members of Bgy. FLET took part in the meeting. A pertinent Executive Order would be drafted and submitted to the
Municipal Mayor in order to provide legal basis for the ManCom to operate and receive funds from the CRM budget of the
MAO.
48
Monitoring
Progress of the BR implementation strategy will be measured against the specific SMART objectives outlined in
the action table above.
The overall success of the Governance and Management Plan will be measured through the EcoGov/CCEF MPA
effectiveness rating tool.
The goal of the Plan, in combination with the Rare pride campaign is to up 1 level higher from present or
achieve level 3 “Enforced” by June 2012
The monitoring plan of the Pride campaign foresees the monitoring of a number of additional metrics to assess
the progress on barrier removal, behavior change and threat reduction:









% of members of Mgt Committee belonging to listed categories (local village leaders, influential family
members, local women’s associations, private sector representatives, local religious groups, civil
service and the youth sector)
% of days per month that there is a record of 24/7 guarding coverage in log book
Increase in arrest for year 1
Number of attendees of Barangay Assemblies
Monthly activities conducted by enforcement team (outreach, market denial, foot patrols, meetings
with community intelligence partners, etc.)
average n of reports of intrusions received per month by the enforcement team
N of intrusions from local versus outside fishers
Decrease in intrusions from community and adjacent village
Decrease in illegal and destructive fishing
For more details on the frequency and methods for data collection please refer to the campaign monitoring plan.
Feasibility and Impact
This action plan underwent expert validation and approval process. The planning workshop was facilitated by an
external auditor, Rodolfo Santos, PhD. He has a long history of organizational development facilitation in
organizations of various level and scale in the Philippines following a diverse business model. The tool used in
49
planning i.e. MPA Effectiveness Rating is a standard tool in the Philippines to assess management performance of
MPAs which has been published by White et al. 2001 and was further enhance by EcoGov Philippine and UP-MSI
[MEAT]. The action plans was an output of the 2 day workshop participated by the TWG, consulted to ManCom
local fishers, enforcers, LGU department heads who are considered experts in their localities thereby producing a
ground truth strategies. Since this will be integrated in the Project Plan where LAP/LCE endorsement is affixed, the
same signature will suffice for approval. This action plan will be validated back to the community after a series of
iterations during module 3 to serve as the road map to achieve Level 3 status by June 2012.
6. Action Plan
[This are the activities that resulted out of your MPA effectiveness rating action planning workshop and TWG and ManCom
planning workshops. Timeline should follow the campaign life. You may include other strategies and activities from existing MPA
plans and other meetings relevant to governance and enforcement.
ACTION PLAN
Critical Areas
Relevant indicators
 Management plan
adopted and
legitimized by the
LGU or PAMB [ang
plano sa pamamahala
ng MPA ay
inaprubahan ng SB]
Management
Plan (11.1%)

MPA
management
plan
and/or
ordinance
reviewed/updated in
a
participatory
process [ang plano sa
pamamahala ng MPA
ay narebyu at naupdate]
Smart Objective
review and revise
management
plan in order to
achieve level 3 sa
july 2012.
Specific
Activity
workshop
upang I rebyu
ang lumang
management
plan at I update
Persons
responsible
MAO Caneso
together with
members of
Management
Committee
Timeframe
4th week of July
Budget ('000
PhP)
3
Source of
budget
Support
needed
LGU/external/
Rare BR
Funds
LGU,
DENR,DILG
Remarks
considered subactivity of
Management Plan
adopted and
legitimized by the
LGU or PAMB
50
 MPA management
plan including
budgetary
requirements
incorporated in the
LGU development
plan
management
body 10%
 Management body
formed and functional
[nabuo na ang grupo
na mamamahala sa
MPA ay ito ay
kumikilos]
construed as sub
activity. If the Mgt
Plan has been
adopted and
legitimized it
means this item has
been addressed
already
Revive/activate
the FSMR mgt.
council as
indicated in the
original (2001)
mgt. plan
to include as an
activity in the
planning
workshop
MAO Caneso
together with
members of
Management
Committee
4th week of July
none
integrate the
practice of
performance mgt.
monitoring in the
mgt. body
conduct mgt
effectiveness
rating
discussion
included in
monthly
meeting to
determine if
level 3 is
achieved
LGU with the help
of MFARMC and
Rare
every 3 months
none
DENR, Rare,
LGU
LGU
workshop must
include planning
and commitment
building

Management
body
active
and
supported by legal
instrument
[ang
grupong namamahala
sa MPA ay aktibo ay
suportado ng legal na
instrumento]

Management
body capable to run
the
MPA
independently [may
kakayanan
ang
grupong namamahala
ng
MPA
na
pamahalaan ito nang
walang tulong mula sa
labas]
 Performance of
management body
regularly monitored
and evaluated with
community/stakehold
er participation [ang
takbo ng papamahala
sa MPA ay regulara na
tinatasa]
51

Management
body capacitated for
fund sourcing
set up trust fund
for MPA mgt.
prepare mgt
plan for
submission to
signatories
(Atty. Regala
and Ruby
Mendones)
LGU with
MFARCM and
Rare
July-August
obtain formal
support from the
province
esp.financial
support
Resolution
from Bgy.,
suported by the
Mun. and
endorsed to
Gov. Salceda
Uson Bgy.- PB
Salvacion Buarao
Agosto
clarify budget on
MPA what object
of expenditure
(training?
Gasoline? Other
services?)
ensure that MPA
mgt cost base of
mgt plan is
integrated in the
AIP.
know from
Budget office
of LGU and at
Bgy. Council
Mgt.
Committee
meet with LGU
and Bgy.
Council
none

Formal
commitment from the
Provincial
Council
giving MPA stronger
political support
legal instrument
 Budget from LGU
or from other sources
allocated
and
is
accessible for MPA
management
[may
badyet mula sa LGU
para sa pamamahala
ng MPA]
Financing
 Budget from LGU
or from other sources
is being allocated and
accessed for 2 or
more
consecutive
years
[may
alokasyong
badyet
para sa pamamahala
ng MPA mula sa LGU
sa loob ng 2 taon]
Manuel Basallote
Manuel Basallote
Jun-11
Agosto
none
Addressed if
the above
activity is done
52

Environment
friendly
enterprise
and/or fees collected
as
a
sustainable
financing strategy

Education
program
raising
awareness
about
MPA functions and
benefits started [may
programang
pangedukasyon
na
napasimulan]
IEC

IEC activities
conducted
[gumugulong na ang
mga gawaing pangedukasyon]
 Education program
sustained public
awareness and
compliance
[mayroong
pangmatagalang
programang pangedukasyon]
 IEC program on
MPAs sustained over
the years

Advanced IEC
materials developed
and
disseminated
with assistance from
partners
and/or
private sector grants
(e.g. video production) 
Establish user fee
system through
SB resolution
Resolution
from SB so
they can collect
user's fee
To run a literacy
program on
sustainable
fishing with
Alternative
Learning Program
of Bacacay
Discuss with
ALP
coordinator
and implement
the action plan
Install sign boards
in the Poblacion
and in the three
bgys covered by
the MPA
Design and
install
signboards
To make
sustainable
fishing part of the
Bacacay
curriculum
sponsored by
Bicol University
College of
Education
Ruby Mendones
DEPED, Bgy.
Council of Uson
ManCOm
Agosto 2011
none
July 2011-July
2012
Aug-11
10
Rare Core
fund fr IEC
and DENR
Counterpart
5
Solicit from
Supra Feeds
handouts on
Sustainable
fishing and
other learning
kits
ICRMP funds of
DENR will be
tapped for this
signboards will be
pretested in the
community
reequest from
DepEd
Ruby Mendones
August-October
none
counterpartin
g
DENR, BU,
DepEd, First
Congressional
District, AKO
Bicol
Video
production
Rare
August-Dec.
2011
5 for copy
production
DENR, Rare.
LGU
UW Footage of
MERF
c/o SM
To produce
underwater video
and plug for
educational
purposes
 MPA emphasizes
on public education
and is being used as a
study tour site,
residents advocate for
MPAs
53
ENFORCEMENT
36.8%
 Collaborative
patrolling and
surveillance
conducted by
mandated
enforcement group
and local community
volunteers, records
maintained and open
to everyone [kasama
ang komunidad sa
pagpapatrolya, may
plano sa
pagpapatrolya]
Include in the
updating of
mgt.plan
discussion on
budget allocation
for honorarium
Revive
schedule of
seaborne
patrol, renew
deputization
through
retraining of
flsh warden
MAO Caneso
kasama ang mga
kinatawan ng
dating
Management
Committee
August
MAO and BFAR
none
involve MFLET
Request to the
Mayor for the
MFLET to do
assessment ;
include this in
plan updating.
Mr. Rey Agaser,
MENRO
July 2011, July
2012
c/o LGU mun.
(MENRO and
MAO)
none
 Fishing effectively
stopped inside the
sanctuary zone [wala
nang nangingisda sa
loob ng sanktuwaryo]
 Enforcement
system fully
operational [ang
pagpapatrolya ay
regular na gumagana]
M and E

Regular
participatory
biophysical
monitoring
being
conducted
[ang
bayopisikal
na
monitoring ay regular
na ginagawa]

Annual
participatory
biophysical
monitoring and timely
feedback of results
being implemented
for 2 consecutive
years
or
more,
monitoring
team
accountable
for
reliability of results
[after 2 years from
establishment or the
baseline reference up
to the evaluation
54
period]

Socio-economic
monitoring regularly
conducted,
monitoring
team
accountable
for
timely feedback and
reliability of results

Evaluation of
ecological and socioeconomic
impacts
conducted
and
feedback mechanisms
are in place
 Performance M&E
linked to an incentive
system regularly
conducted
see program on M
and E

MPA billboards,
boundary
markers/anchor
buoys
maintained
[ang mga billboards,
markets at boya at
napapangalagaan]
Improve
maintenance
system
Maintenance
33.3%
ask authority to
rehabilitate
guardhouse to
be paid by Mr.
Basallote.
(concreting of
roof); the Bgy
will write the
Mayor.
Kapt. Buarao
Jul-11
c/o Mr.
Basallote
none
c.o BFAR
c/o Ruby
Mendones
5 for gasoline
and food
2 for travel of
staff

Support facilities
constructed/added
reinstall by
having sinkerr;
repaint
billboard
MAO to request
from BFAR
wn the year
Ruby Mendones
July
DENR-Rare
55
Opportunities for funding:
1. Municipal- CRM as one of the basic services of the LGUs is allotted annual appropriation. The activities and
facilities shall be funded from the share of LGUs in the proceeds of national taxes and other local revenues
and funding support from the national government, its instrumentalities and government-owned or –
controlled corporations. (Id., sec. 17(g))
2. External- There is an existing informal agreement that will be forged by the DENR, LGU and an industry
called Supra Feeds that will make possible the automatic donation of a peso per sack of feeds sold for the
upkeep of the Fish Sanctuary and Marine Reserve. This was initially determined through the Ridge Run for
Reef held in March 2011 to raise funds for the MPA. Supra Feeds is an agrichemical company based in Ligao
City in the Province of Albay.
3. Others-Support to MPA is one of the priorities of the Department of Agriculture’s Bureau of Fisheries and
Aquatic Resources Coral Triangle Initiative. For extension and training services, the Regional Fisheries and
Training Center (RFTC) based in Pili, Camarines Sur provides an opportunity for fishers to be trained on
sustainable fishing practices. The Bicol University School of Fisheries in Tabaco, Albay could also be a good
source of training and extension services support
.
56
D. Monitoring Plan
Target
SMART Objectives
Audience
TA
1- K The percentage of fishers who can list any benefits of the NTZ to the
local commuity from having an NTZ nearby will increase from 83 percent
friends
measured in May 2011 to 100 percent measured in August 2012 ( an
increase of 14 pp (Q23B in KAP Survey)
A The percentage of fishers who thinks it is easy to report violations of
rules and regulations such as intrusion into the NTZ will increase from36
percent measured in May 2011 to 50 percent measured in August 2012
(an increas of 14 pp 34 D in Kap Survey
ICThe percentage of the fishers who have not discussed with anyone
regarding the consequences of breaking the rule on MPA will decrease
from 73 percent measured in May 2011 to 43 percent measured in August
2012 ( a decrease of 30 pp, Q38 on KAP Survey
BR The percentage of fishers who strongly agree or agree that rules of the
no take zone are regularly enforced so that violators are caught and
punished will increase from 67 percent measured in May 2011 to 77
percent mseasured in August 2012, an increase in 10 pp (Q35F in KAP
Survey)
BC The percentage of fishers who follow rules and regulations often at the
UBPBFSMR will increase from 14 percent measured in May 2011 to 30
percent measured in August 2012 ( an increase of 14 pp (Q65 in KAP
Survey)
BC The percentage of fishers who are most involved in deicision making in
the NTZ in the last six months will increase from 30 to 70 percent
measured in May 2011 to 70 percent as measured in August 2012, an
increase in 40 pp, Q21 in KAP survey.
Threat Reduction
The percentage of
fishers who have seen
in the NTZ resource
users specializing in the
target fish such as
aquarium fish, mollusk
etc. will decrease from
37 percent measured in
May 2011 to 30 percent
measured in August
2012 ( a decrease of 7
pp, Q 40 in KAP survey
Suggest using the %
from
subsistence
fishers from inside the
village and nearby
village
from
same
Coservation Reseult
The percentage of
resident who perceive
increase in fish catch
as
a
result
of
establishing the MPA
will increase from 45
percent measured in
May 2011 to 55
percent measured in
August 2012 ( an
increase in 10 pp Q33
in KAP survey)
57
TA
2members
of
organized
groups
K Awareness of the role at their level in pursuing plans and programs for
the MPA and aware of benefits of MPA
TA
3residents
K Communities are aware of the benefits and regulations of their NTZ
TA 4
A Organized communities are willing to participate in and support
meetings and activities related to MPA
IC They will talk among themselves their role in managing local marine
resources for the community
BC They will entrust the leadership of UBPBFSMR
question instead if the
acquarium
fish,mollusks collectors
(see
commenst
in
appendix
results
section)
and know who to report to
A communities have increased level of support in the enforcement of
regulations in the MPA
communities discuss with one another their role in reporting intrusions,
violations in support to MPA management
IC The Council is strengthened to enforce the regulation on the MPA and
in implementing the Mgt Council Plan
BC increase the number of community members who sustain support to
NTZ by reporting violations, intrusions
Please insert the SMART objectives for TA3!
K Awareness of the MPA structures, levels of authority and corresponding
functions, duties and responsibilities in achieving goals for the MPA
A Performs their role in providing CRM services in the 36 coastal
barangays including MPA management in Uson Buang Pongco Bonga
IC Key LGU employees will discuss with each other their role to further
strengthen the MPA structure
58
E. ENDORSEMENT OF THIS PLAN
This plan has been shared with and endorsed by the Technical Working Committee and Management Committee of the Uson MPA It was
also shared with key stakeholders such as fishers, residents and organized groups as well as with those interviewed during the directed
conversations. Throughout the planning process new ideas and recommendations have been incorporated and revisions made, to the
extent that this plan has now been approved by all critical partners including the Mayor of Bacacay, the LAP supervisor and Rare. The
plan will be posted on RarePlanet, which will continue to be used for information sharing and periodic updates: www.rareplanet.org
(insert link to your campaign milestones page).
This plan has been read and approved by
HON. TOBIAS C. BETITO
Municipal Mayor, Bacacay
July 15, 2011
FELIX C. MENDOZA
Regional Technical Director, PAWCZMS DENR V
July 15, 2011
59
F. References and Acknowledgements
References
Insert a list of all literature consulted & referenced in the plan
Example:

Margoluis, R. A. & Salafsky N. (1998) Measures of Success, Island Press, Washington DC.

Jenks B. (2001) An island under threat;; 96pp Searon Press
Acknowledgements
I am most grateful to my supervisors, Joselin Marcus Fragada and Felix Mendoza, Regional Exceutive Director and Regional
Technical Director of DENR V, respectively for the support they have been generously extending to me and to my site;
I am also forever grateful to Rare’s Survey Pro instructor, Analisa Bianchessi, for enabling me to comprehend Survey Pro and the
many wonders it offers; She has been very patient every step of the way.until the results of the survey took an amazing shape, that of
the audience persona.
To my PPM/ Advisor Ms. Crissy Canlas for all the fine tunings and the journey with PEP2. Thanks a whole lot, Crissy! Big thanks to
Pablo Rojas for the insights on governance and enforcement as regards reef protection:; Fel Cadiz for the mentoring; Dr. Ronet
Santos for the OD inputs and the excel tutotials;Glocel for the smiles, warmth, tender loving support we thought we can only get from
her; for Stuart Green-for the greatest challenge ever posed-and his sense of sacrifice to keep PEP2 well on its way to achieving its
goals; Brooke Sadowsky for the pleasure of her company in Boljoon as our guest and mentor on qualitative research; to PEP2 team
in America-Amy, Martha, Dale, Steve, Brett, Paul Butler and the Rare Conseration brains-collective. Truly, you are all Rare!
To my colleagues in DENR and my reef ranger clique whose contributions to this plan were invaluable indeed. Special thanks to
Cathy, Ate Dessa, Bel, Sheryll, Vince, Venal, Cherry, Dag, Tian, Marybeth, and Arman (the survey questionnaire!) for this journey;
Thank you Bicol University Dean Noemi Ibo, Dr. Rose Frias, Prof Alex De Guzman and Prof. Valenzuela with their AB Political
Science students who took the challenge and made sure we have the KAP survey result at hand in a day. You are all amazingly
great!!!
My parents: Mama and Papa; Mama Yaying and Papa Melio; my aunts: Maye, Manen,my niece Ella for the SurveyPro support she
gave and the joy of working together under pressure; Manoy Basil, Manay, Jeff, May, and Ia for the happy moments; Nette, Mother
Trinidad, Ate Honor and Ate Fening for the unceasing prayers,
My friends: Malou and Eric Parlade for the friendship made to last a lifetime; and
Julius whose company and idea of inner peace have bridged many loose ends including my schedules and priorities.
60
G.APPENDICES
1. Fisheries profile
Refer to fisheries profile template for this, insert only those sections that you have done through your PCRA
Table 1.Problem Tree of Uson based on focus group discussion at the PCRA 2011
61
Fisheries demographics
Details
Number
Number of fishermen (full time) in Uson
44
Number of fishermen (part time)
30
Number of fishers (women)
5
Number of fishers (children)
15
Number of gleaners
20
Number of boats motorized
25
Number of non-motorized boats
17
Ave. number of individuals in a motorized
boat/trip
Ave. number of individuals in a nonmotorized boat/trip
Other forms of livelihood /month
3-5
Lean months for fishing/why
Dec to February
Peak months for fishing/why
March, April, May
3
Mat making, carpentry,
62
MPA History
Year
Uses of Core Zone
Uses Buffer Zone
Before establishment
Gear
type
Pangjke
Fishing ground
1 year after
establishment
No take zone
Fishing and navigation
2 years after
establishment
No take zone
-do-
3 years after
establishment
No take zone
-do-
Expenses per
trip (hook,
nylon, net,
bait)
Number of
kilos caught
per trip
5k net, 2-3
persons
5-15
kgs
Number of
kilos sold
4
kgs
Price
per kilo
80/kg
Net
income
Types of
expense
from sales
Number
of kilos to
take
home
Rice, sugar
coffee
Banwit
Bentol
baklad
ugog)
40 per kilo na semilya
gastos sa
bait o pain
(Paon)
50
pcs
Pang-eskwela
2
kilos
63
Resource use and
issues coding
Fishpond
399K
Sugpo,
bangus
3x harvest/yr,
100 kilos
bangus
Sugpo 24K
Hati ang
delihensya
pangkain
1-5 kilos
64
Use
Human settlement
Power station
Chapel
Schools
Agricultural land
Hook and line fishing
Spear fishing
Bottom set gill nets
Fish landing area
Docking area
Navigational route
Multipurpose hall
Code
Yes
None
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Issue
Poisonous substances
Commercial fishing
Mangrove harvesting
Reclamation
Garbage disposal
Inadequate IEC
Habitat destruction
Lack of law enforcement
Poaching
Sedimentation
River discharges
Gleaning inside MPA
Code
None
None
Yes
None
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
None
none
no
Gleaning
Resorts
Fish corral
Fish traps
Fish ponds
Guardhouse
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
yes
Fishing inside MPA
yes
65
Trend Diagram
Year
2002(After MPA
establishment)
Year 2003
Number of
infringement
-do-
Year 2005
-do-
Year 2006
-do-
Year 2008
Year 2009
Intruders (from
where, who, age
group)
Course/s of action
taken (apprehension,
affidavit writing,
litigation,
imprisonment)
Forms of
incentives/disince
ntives
There were
violation but
wee not
apprehended
-do-
Year 2004
Year 2007
Types/forms of
infringement/ge
ars used
4-5 persons
7 persons
2-3 persons
Dynamite fishing
Buang, Salvacion
30-40
compressor San Roque Tabaco 17-20
Pangke sa may
sanctuary
Cabasan, Buang,
Uson
Bacacay PNP
Bacacay Police Station
Turn over Bacacay
PNP
Put to jail the
whole day
No incentive
Wara insentibo,
Kinasuhan
(naalop) o
pinatawad
66
70
60
50
Fishcatch (kg)
40
30
20
10
0
197019751980198519901995200020052010
Year
Fig. __ Amount of fish catch in kilograms over time. (PCRA, 2011 Uson)
The participants to the recent PCRA conducted plotted this downward trend of fish catch noted that the high volume of fish
catch in the early 70s was also due to the presence of illegal fishing methods such as use of dynsmite that was then
unregulated. They have noted the downward decline of fish catch through time especially in recent years.
67
KAP Survey #: __________
Survey Questionnaire
Republic of the Philippines
Province of Albay
MUNICIPALITY OF BACACAY
Uson Buang Pongco Bonga Fish Sanctuary and Marine Reserve
Pride English Program 2 (Philippines)
Baseline Survey (2010) and Post-campaign Survey (2012)
Hello, ako po si _________________________________ estudyante kan Bicol University. Nagigigbo pa kami ki survey ngunyan manongod
sa kapalibutan asin mga tawo digdi saindong barangay. Salamat po sa imong pakisumaro sa survey na ini sa paagi ki pagsimbag sa mga
kahapotan. Anu man po na impormasyon na itatao nindo pati ngaran dae po ipapaaram sa iba. An mga kasimbagan po nindo makatabang
na marhay sa pagplano ki masurunod na mga aktitbidad sa barangay na ini.
Dapat po at least 15 years old ka para maka participate sa survey na ini.
An participasyon mo sa survey na ini boluntaryo. Pwede po na dae magsimbag sa kahapotan na sa iling mo dae moa ram an kasimbagan.
Pero importante an mga pananaw mo samuya kaya laom mi na mapartisipar ka. Pwede po kita magpoon na kan interview?
Respondent agrees to be interviewed [ ] Yes
(If no, keep tally on separate sheet of paper)
SECTION 1 - BACKGROUND INFORMATION FILLED IN PRIOR TO THE INTERVIEW WITHOUT ASKING THE
RESPONDENT
Barangay:
[ ] Uson
[ ] Buang
[ ] Pongco Bonga Date (month/day/year): ___________________
Survey period:
[ ] Pre campaign - Baseline (Feb 2011)
Gender of respondent: [ ] Male
Target Audience
[ ] Post-campaign (June 2012)
[ ] Female
68
[ ] TA1 - Fishermen (random)
[ ] TA2 – Organized groups-MFARMC, BFARMC, BDC
[ ] TA3 – Uson Residents (random)
SECTION 2 - SOCIOECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC QUESTIONS
"To begin, I would like to ask you some questions about yourself"
(1) Which of the following statements best describes you [choose only one]: (Arin ka po difdi sa mga binaggit? Magpili ka po ki saro)
-
You are a fisher that fished at least 1 time in the past month near the Uson Buang Pongco Bonga FSMR (UBPBFSMR),
You are a fisher that fished at least 1 time in the past month in the (UBPBFSMR),
You are a gleaner that gleaned at least 1 time in the past month near the (UBPBFSMR),
You are a gleaner that gleaner at least 1 time in the past month in the (UBPBFSMR),
You are a Community Folk from Barangay Uson
You are a Fisher from neighboring Barangay that fished at least 1 time in the past year near the (UBPBFSMR),
You are a Fisher from neighboring Barangay that gleaned at least 1 time in the past year near the (UBPBFSMR)
You are a member of the organized groups
None of the above
(2) Where do you live in relation to the UBPBFSMR? Do you live inside of Uson, In Buang, in Pongco Bonga, or somewhere else?
[choose only one] (Sain ka po naka istar, sa mismong Uson, Sa Buang o sa Pongco Bonga? O sa luwas kan mga binggit na
Barangay?Saro po an pilion)
[ ] I live in Uson (Nakaistar sa Brgy. Uson)
[ ] I do not live in Uson but I live in Bacacay (Bako sa Uson pero taga Bacacay)
[ ] Other (iba pa) ___________
(3) How old were you at your last birthday? (Pira an edad mo sa nag aging compleanyo mo?)
[ ] 14 or younger [ ] 15 to 19
[ ] 20 to 24
[ ] 25 to 29
[ ] 30 to 34
[ ] 35 to 39
[ ] 40 to 44
[ ] 45 to 49
[ ] 50 to 54
[ ] 55 or older
(4) What is the highest level of education you attained? (Ano po an inabot mo sa pag iskwela, magpili po ki saro sana)
[ ] No school completed (dae naka-eskuwela)
[ ] Some or all primary completed (Grade 1 antos Grade 3)
[ ] Some or all intermediate school completed (Grade 4 antos sa pagka kumpleto sa Elementarya)
[ ] Some or all secondary completed (Nakatungtung o nakatapos ki High school)
[ ] Some or full college/university completed (Nakatungtong o nakatapos sa kolehiyo)
[ ] Some or full vocational course (Nakatapos ki vocational course)
[ ] Some or all of religious school/college completed (Nakatungtong o nakatapos ki pageswela sa relihion)
[ ] Refused to answer (Habo magsimbag)
(5) If you belong to a religion/sect, please tell me which religion/sect. [choose one only] (Ano an sa imong Reliheyo o sekta, magpil ki
saro)
69
[ ] Roman Catholic
[ ] Church of Latter Day Saints
[ ] Protestant
[ ] Baptist
[ ] None
[ ] Iglesia Filipina Indipendiente (IFI)
[ ] Born Again
[ ] Seventh Day Adventist
[ ] Local/traditional
[ ] Other ________________
[ ] Iglesia Ni Kristo
[ ] Muslim/Islam
[ ] Jehovah's Witness
[ ] Refuses to answer
(6) What is your primary occupation or sector in which you work? [choose one only]
(Ano po an sa imong pinaka hanapbuhay?)
[ ] Agriculture
[ ] Fishing
[ ] Gleaning (pagkua ki mga shells
[ ] Small business (nagatinda)
[ ] Office work
[ ] Food preparation or restaurant
[ ] Professional (Lawyer, Health care provider, Teacher)
[ ] Artisan (crafts)
[ ] housework
[ ] student
[ ] Not currently employed
[ ] other private company
[ ] fish vending
[ ] non-governmental organization
[ ] self employed
[ ] government (local)
[ ] government
[ ] Other ________________
[ ] N/A
(7) What is your secondary occupation or sector in which you work? [choose one only] (Ano man ang imong ikaduwa na hanapbuhay o
sideline?)
[ ] Agriculture
[ ] Fishing
[ ] Gleaning (pagkua ki mga shells
[ ] Small business (nagatinda)
[ ] Office work
[ ] Food preparation or restaurant
[ ] Professional (Lawyer, Health care provider, Teacher)
[ ] Artisan (crafts)
[ ] housework
[ ] student
[ ] Not currently employed
[ ] other private company
[ ] fish vending
[ ] non-governmental organization
[ ] self employed
[ ] government (local)
[ ] government
[ ] Other ________________
[ ] N/A
(8) How many people live in your household? (Pira po kamo gabos na naka istar sa harong?)
[ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5 [ ] 6 [ ] 7 [ ] 8 [ ] 9 [ ] 10 [ ] More than 10
(9) In the past calendar year, from January to December, what is your best estimate of the total income earned by all family members
that currently live in the same home with you. Again, this information will not be shared with anyone. (If can give daily to monthly
just compute) (Pira man an suma total na ganansya kan bilog na pamilya sa laog kan naka aging taon)
[ ] Below 30,000 Pesos
[ ] Between 30,000 and 50,000
[ ] Between 50,001 and 75,000
[ ] Between 75,001 and 100,000
[ ] Greater than 100,000 Pesos
[ ] Not sure
[ ] Refused to answer
(10) What percentage of this annual income comes from fishing? (Pirang porsiyento kaini an hali sa pagdagat?)
[ ] 0%
[ ] 1 - 20%
[ ] 21 - 40% [ ] 41 - 60% [ ] 61 - 80% [ ] 81 - 100%
70
(11) What percentage of this annual income comes from gleaning? (Pirang porsiyento kaini an hali sa pagsira sa tampi?)
[ ] 0%
[ ] 1 - 20%
[ ] 21 - 40% [ ] 41 - 60% [ ] 61 - 80% [ ] 81 - 100%
(12) If Fishing, what gears do you use? (kung pagdagat, ano ang saimong gamit sa panagat)
[ ] Hikot
[ ] Fish trap (bobo)
[ ] Hook & Line (banwit)
[ ] Spear fishing (pana)
[ ] Other ________________
SECTION 3 - TRUSTED SOURCES OF INFORMATION & MEDIA ACCESS/EXPOSURE
(13) People hear information about the environment from many different sources. I am going to read you a list of sources from which
you might hear information about the environment, and I would like you to tell me whether you would find that source "Most
trustworthy [MT], Very trustworthy [VT], Somewhat trustworthy [ST], or Not trustworthy [NT], Not sure/Don't know (NS/DK) (Dakol
an impormasyon manongod sa kapalibutan. Arin sa mga ini an sa hiling mo makosog an pagtobod mo-MT, minatobod ka VT, pwedeng tobodan-ST, dae pwede tobodan -NT, wara ka masabi-NS/DK)
a. Person on the radio
[ ] MT [ ] VT [ ] ST [ ] NT [ ] NS/DK
b. Person on television
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
c. Report in newspaper or magazine
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
d. Law enforcement official
e. National government environment officialsDENR
f. Local government environment officials
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
g. Local community leaders
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
h. Religious leaders
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
i.
Friends or family members
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
j.
Teachers
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
k. Scientist
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
l.
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
m. Information in printed booklet
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
n. Information from puppet show
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
o. Information from public meeting
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
p. Conservation volunteer
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
q. Kuya Kim / Richard Gutierrez
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
r.
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
Information on poster or billboard
NGO environmental officials
71
s. Bantay dagat
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
t.
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
u. Barangay captain
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
v. Information received sa text sa cellphone
[ ] MT
[ ] VT
[ ] ST
[ ] NT
[ ] NS/DK
Lideres kan UBPBFSMR
w. Who would you trust the most (from list above or other) if they told you something about the environment? (Sisay sa mga ini an
pinaka pigatobodan mo kun may tataramon sya sa kapalibotan?)
[ ] person on radio
[ ] person on television
[ ] report in newspaper/magazine
[ ] law enforcement official
[ ] national government environment official
[ ] local government environment official
[ ] local community leaders
[ ] religious leaders
[ ] friends or family members
[ ] teachers
[ ] information on poster/billboard
[ ] information in printed booklet
[ ] information from puppet show
[ ] information from public meeting or festival
[ ] conservation group volunteer
[ ] Celebrity/Soap Star/ Entertainer
[ ] Non-government environmental officials
[ ] Barangay captain
[ ] UBPBFSMR lider
[ ] Bantay dagat
[ ] Other ________________
[ ] N/A
(14) In the past month, would you say that you usually listened to the radio never, up to 3 days per week, 4 to 6 days per week, or 7
days per week. (Pirang beses ka ngadangog ki radio sa laog ki sarong semana?)
[ ] Never [ ] Up to 3 days per week
[ ] 4 to 6 days per week
[ ] 7 days per week
A) When you listen to the radio, which radio stations are your most preferred stations? (Anong istasyon an pinaka piga
danggog mo)
[ ] DZGB Legazpi
[ ] Magic Radio [ ] DZRC Legazpi
[ ] OK FM [ ] Fox FM Legazpi
[ ] Bombo Radyo Legazpi
[ ] One Radio Tabaco [ ] No favorite station
[ ] Don't know
[ ] Don't listen to the radio
[ ] Other _______________
B) When you listen to the radio, what is your favorite type of program that you like to listen to? (Anong klase sa mga programa
ang piga dangog mo, magpili ka ki saro programa)
[ ] Local music
[ ] International music
[ ] News
[ ] Sports
[ ] Talk shows
[ ] Dramas
[ ] Religious
[ ] No favorite
[ ] Don't listen to radio
[ ] Other ________________
C) When you listen to the radio, Monday to Friday, what are the most likely times for you to listen to the radio? (Ano na oras ka
nagadangog ki radio pwede magpli antos 2 na simbag)
[ ] Before 6:00 a.m.
[ ] 6:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
[ ] 10:01 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
72
[ ] 2:01 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
[ ] No particular time
[ ] Don't watch/listen
[ ] 6:01 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
[ ] Off and on all day
[ ] After 10:00 p.m.
[ ] Don't know
D) When you listen to the radio, Saturday and Sunday, what are the most likely times for you to listen to the radio? (Ano na mga
oras ka nagadangog sa radio sa aldaw na Sabado asin Domingo)
[ ] Before 6:00 a.m.
[ ] 6:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
[ ] 10:01 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
[ ] 2:01 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
[ ] 6:01 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
[ ] After 10:00 p.m.
[ ] No particular time
[ ] Off and on all day
[ ] Don't know
[ ] Don't watch/listen
(15) In the past month, would you say that you usually read a newspaper or magazine never, up to 3 days per week, 4 to 6 days per
week or 7 days per week? (Nagabasa ka ba ki mga magazine o mga basahon, pira na beses sa laog ki sarong semana)
[ ] Never [ ] Up to 3 days per week
[ ] 4 to 6 days per week
[ ] 7 days per week
A) Which newspaper or magazine do you usually read. Please tell me up to three publications that you read most often. (Ano na
klase ki babasahon an tiga basa mo)
[ ] Philippine Daily Inquirer [ ] Manila Bulletin
[ ] MayonTimes
[ ] Dyaryo Veritas
[ ] Bicol Reporter
[ ] Philippine Star
[ ] No favorite
[ ] Don't know
[ ] Don't read
[ ] Other _______________
(16) I am going to list some different types of media programs, and I would like you to tell me how much you like each program type. Do
you like it the most (MOST), like it a lot (ALOT), like it a little (LITTLE), or not like it? (Arin na mga programa an sa imong
paborito. Sa simbag mop o paki taram sakuya kun moyahun mong maray, moya, moya ki diit o habo mo)
a. Tagalog Love Melodies
[ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not liked
b. Classic Oldies Music
[ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not liked
c. Traditional Music
[ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not liked
d. Local news
[ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not liked
e. National news
[ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not liked
f. International news
[ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not liked
g. Sports
[ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not liked
h. Religious programs
[ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not liked
i. Talk show programs
[ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not liked
j. Dramas
[ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not liked
k. Comedy
[ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not liked
l. Puppet shows
[ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not liked
m. Locally-produced video
[ ] MOST [ ] A LOT [ ] LITTLE [ ] Not liked
73
n. What other types of media programs do you like to watch, listen to, or read about? (Ano pa an programa na muyamo
dangogon, hilingon o basahon apwera kan mga
binanggit?____________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
SECTION 4 - ASSIGN RESPONDENT TO STAGE-OF-BEHAVIOR-CHANGE
(17) Do you glean or fish or both? (choose on only) Nagasira ka sa tampi o nagadagat ka
[ ] yes, I glean (nagakua sa tampi)
[ ] yes, I fish (Managat)
[ ] yes, I glean and fish
[ ] no I don't glean and don't fish
[ ] N/A
(18) (If respondent said no I don't fish and I don't glean in previous question then don't ask question and select "behavior is not relevant
to this respondent")
I am going to read you a list of 6 statements about whether or not you have gone fishing or gleaning in the UBPBFSMR in the past 6
months. I want you to listen to all 6 statements, then tell me which one statement best represents you: Arin sa mga minasunod
an mina representar saimo.
[ ] I have never considered stopping fishing/gleaning in the UBPBFSMR (wala ako plano na magtonong sa pagsira sa UBPBFSMR)
[ ] I have considered stopping fishing/gleaning in the UBPBFSMR but do not want to stop doing so (nagga isip na ako magpondo
sa pagsira sa UBPBFSMR)
[ ] I intend to stop fishing/gleaning in the UBPBFSMR in the next 6 months but have not done so yet (Mapondo na ako mag sira sa
UBPBFSMR sa masunod na anom na bulan)
[ ] I have talked to someone about stopping fishing/gleaning in the SPMS in the past 6 months but have not stopped yet
(nakastorya ako na magpondo na magsira sa UBPBFSMR sa naka aging bulan bulan ugaring padagos pa ako na
nagasira duman)
[ ] I have only gone fishing/gleaning in the UBPBFSMR a few times in the past 6 months (nakapanagat ako sa UBPBFSMR minsan
sana sa laog ki anom na bulan)
[ ] I have not fished/gleaned in the UBPBFSMR in the past 6 months (dae ako nakapagsira sa UBPBFSMR sa naka aging anom na
bulan)
[ ] Behavior is not relevant for this respondent.(Bako aplikable an arin man digdi sa respondent)
(19) I am going to read you a list of 6 statements about following regulations of the UBPBFSMR I would like you to listen to all 6
statements, then tell me which one statement best represents you: (basahan ta ka ki anom ka linya manongod sa regulasyon
sa UBPBFSMR, arin sa mga ini an mina representar saimo)
[ ] I have never considered following the regulations of the UBPBFSMR (dae ko tiga isip na magsunos sa mga regulasyon sa
UBPBFSMR)
74
[ ] I have considered following the regulations of the UBPBFSMR but don't want to do so (aram ko an mga regulasyon sa
UBPBFSMR pero wara ako plano na magsunod kaini)
[ ] I intend to follow the regulations of the UBPBFSMR in the next 6 months. (plano ko na magsuond sa regulasyon sa maabot na
anom na bulan)
[ ] I have talked to someone about following the regulations of the UBPBFSMR in the past 6 months. (nakastorya na ko sa iba
manongod sa pagsunod sa regulasyon sa UBPBFSMR sa naka aging anom ka bulan)
[ ] I often follow the regulations of the UBPBFSMR but not at all times. (Nagasunod ako sa regulasyon sa UBPBFSMR pero bako
sa sa gabos na panahon)
[ ] I have always followed the regulations of the UBPBFSMR in the past 6 months (Nagasunod ako sa regulasyon sa UBPBFSMR
san aka aging anom ba bulan)
[ ] Behavior not relevant to this respondent
(20)
I am going to read you a list of 6 statements about whether or not you have been involved in governance and
management of the UBPBFSMR in the past 6 months. I want you to listen to all 6 statements, then tell me which one statement
best represents you: Arin sa mga minasunod an mina representar saimo.
[ ] I have never considered attending meetings of the UBPBFSMR Management (Dae ako naga isisp na mag atendir sa mga
pagtiripon manongod sa UBPBFSMR Management)
[ ] I have considered attending meetings of the UBPBFSMR Management, but don't want to do it (Tiga isip ko mag atendir sa
meetings manongod sa UBPBFSMR pero habo ko gibohon)
[ ] I intend to attend meetings of the UBPBFSMR Management in the next 6 months but have not done so yet (Igwa ako ki intenston
na mag atendir sa UBPBFSMR meeting sa masunod na anom na bulan pero dae ko pa nagibo ini)
[ ] I have talked to someone about attending meetings of the UBPBFSMR Management in the last 6 months (May nakahuron na ako
manongod sa pag atendir ki meeting manongod sa UBPBFSMR sa maabot na anom na bulan)
[ ] I have attended at least 1 meetings of the UBPBFSMR Management in the last 6 months (May na atendiran na ako ki meeting
kan UBPBFSMR management sa uminaging anom na bulan)
[ ] I have attended at least 6 meetings of the UBPBFSMR Management in the last 6 months (May na atendiran na ako ki anom na
meeting kan UBPBFSMR management sa uminaging anom na bulan)
[ ] Behavior is not relevant for this respondent
(21) I am going to read you a list of 6 statements about whether or not you have reported any intrusions into the UBPBFSMR to the
enforcement team in the past 6 months. I want you to listen to all 6 statements, then tell me which one statement best represents
you:
[ ] I have never considered reporting any intrusions in the SPMS (Dae ako naga isisp na mag report ki anu man na pagbalga
manongod sa lei kan UBPBFSMR Management)
[ ] I have considered reporting any intrusions in the SPMS, but don't want to do it (Tiga isip ko na mag Report ki pagbalga
manongod sa lei kan UBPBFSMR Management
[ ] I intend to report any intrusions in the UBPBFSMR in the next 6 months but have not done so yet
May intensyon ako na magreport ki pag balgar sa lei kan UBPBFSMR sa masuond na anom na bulan pero dae ko pa
nagigibo)
75
[ ] I have talked to someone about reporting any intrusions into the UBPBFSMR in the last 6 months but have not reported any yet.
May nakahoron na ako manongod sa pag report ki anuman na bagbalgar kan lei sa UBPBFSMR sa nag aging anom na
bulan pero dae pa ako nag report.
[ ] I have reported one intrusion in the UBPBFSMR to the enforcement team in the last 6 months (Nag report na ako ki saro na
pagbalga sa UBPBFSMR sa uminaging anom na bulan.
[ ] I have reported two or more intrusions in the UBPBFSMR to the enforcement team in the last 6 months (Nag report na ako ki
duwa o labi pa sa duwa kan mga pagbalgar sa UBPBFSMR sa naga pasunod kan lei san aka aging anom na bulan.
[ ] Behavior is not relevant for this respondent A
SECTION 5 - ESTABLISH BASELINES FOR AND MEASURE CHANGE IN KNOWLEDGE SMART OBJECTIVES
Now, I would like to ask you some questions about the local environment and wildlife that live in this area.
(22) Please state below whether you believe each regulation is either true or false as a UBPBFSMR Rules/Policies: Simbagon po kun
tama, sala o dae sigurado an minasunod
a. Only members of the UBPSFSMR can harvest fish inside the
UBPBFSMR. An miyembro sana an pwede mag sira sa laog
[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure
kan UBPBFSMR
b. No-one can fish or collect shells inside UBPBFSMR Warang iba
an pwede mag sira o mag kua maski shells sa laog kan
[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure
UBPBFSMR.
c. Only Hook and Line fishing is allowed inside the UBPSFSMR.
Banwit sana an pwedeng klase nin pagsira sa laog kan
[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure
UBPBFSMR.
d. Anyone can glean inside UBPBFSMR, just fishing is not allowed
Pwede magkua ki mga shells, balat sa UBPBFSMR pwera
[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure
kan pagsira na iyo an bawal.
e. It is legal to use cyanide and dynamite to catch fish in the buffer
zone around UBPBFSMR Legal an paggamit ki cyanide ngani [ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure
makadakop sa luwas kan UBPBFSMR.
f. The elected officials are allowed to take fish from the
UBPBFSMR when they visit An mga elehidong opisyal pwede [ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure
tugutan na magsira sa UBPBFSMR
g. After five years of no fishing being allowed, the UBPBFSMR can
h. be harvested again. Maka agi an limang taon na bawal an
[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure
pagsira sa laog kan sanktwaryo, an mga sira sa UBPBFSMR
pwede na giraray na dakopon digdi.
(23) COHORT QUESTION - Some of the questions I am going to ask you are about the no-take zone that is going to be or has been
created in your local area. A no-take zone is a clearly identified area Zone (NTZ)
76
(24)
A) COHORT QUESTION - Are there any benefits to the local community from having a no take zone nearby? (If respondent
answers YES then please also ask next question)
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
B) COHORT QUESTION – (Ask only of those who said yes to previous question) What local community benefits are there from
having the no take zone nearby? You can tell me up to 3 that you know. (Do NOT read out answers but tick as appropriate or
add to other)
[ ] more fish
[ ] area for fish to reproduce
[ ] bigger fish
[ ] bigger or better coral/habitat for fish
[ ] more fertile fish
[ ] bank of the sea/food security
[ ] better regulation/management of fishing activities
[ ] no more destructive fishing in that area
[ ] community ownership
[ ] new skills
[ ] better/new access to tourism
[ ] better community cohesion
[ ] Other _______________________________
[ ] N/A
(25) COHORT QUESTION - I am going to read you a list of people, and I would like you to tell me for each one how much you believe
they have been involved during the past 6 months in important management decisions, such as in determining the size and location
of your local no-take fishing area
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
National Government officials
Local Government officials
Scientists and/or fisheries experts
Local leaders
Local fishers
[ ] Regularly
[ ] Regularly
[ ] Regularly
[ ] Regularly
[ ] Regularly
[ ] Occasionally
[ ] Occasionally
[ ] Occasionally
[ ] Occasionally
[ ] Occasionally
[ ] Never
[ ] Never
[ ] Never
[ ] Never
[ ] Never
[ ] NS/DK
[ ] NS/DK
[ ] NS/DK
[ ] NS/DK
[ ] NS/DK
(26) COHORT QUESTION - I am going to read you a list of people, and I would like you to tell me for each one how much you believe
that during the past 6 months they have been able to determine the regulations for your local no-take fishing area. Were these
individuals the most important decision makers, involved but not the decision makers, or not involved in decision-making?
a. National Government officials
[ ] Most involved [ ] Involved [ ] Not involved [ ] NS/DK
b. Local Government officials
[ ] Most involved [ ] Involved [ ] Not involved [ ] NS/DK
77
c. Scientists and/or fisheries experts
d. Local leaders
e. Local fishers
[ ] Most involved
[ ] Most involved
[ ] Most involved
[ ] Involved
[ ] Involved
[ ] Involved
[ ] Not involved
[ ] Not involved
[ ] Not involved
[ ] NS/DK
[ ] NS/DK
[ ] NS/DK
SECTION 6 - ESTABLISH BASELINES FOR AND MEASURE CHANGE IN ATTITUDE SMART OBJECTIVES
(27) Please state below whether you agree or disagree with the following statements on the possible impacts on the local community if
the SPMS Rules/Policies are not strictly observed by fishers: SA for Strongly Agree, A for Agree, D for Disagree, and SD for
Strongly Disagree
a. Fish will be scared out of the sanctuary and into the fishing nets (
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD
b. Fish species will continue to decline in number or disappear
c. Illegal fishers from outside will be encouraged to come in and blast fish
within the SPMS
d. The corals begin to die when the fish are taken away
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD
e. The local community will be poorer and less united
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD
f. We will catch more fish
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD
(28) Please state below whether you agree or disagree with the following statements associated with poor governance of the
UBPBFSMR
a. Only a few people are involved with the UBPBFMSR management
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD
b. No-one knows who is managing the UBPBFSMR
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD
c. Local Residents know who and when guarding takes place and so are
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD
able to enter UBPBFSMR when the guards are not there (
d. "Outsiders" say that there is more fish, but we don't see any
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD
e. There is no patrol boat to chase after the illegal fishers, so the illegal
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD
fishers just come and ignore the rules knowing they won't be caught
f. Only men are involved in the UBPBFSMR, so the interests and
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD
concerns of women or youth are being ignored
g. The UBPBFSMR regulations need to be followed by all people who go
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD
into the sanctuary
(29) What is your level of support for increasing the enforcement of the regulations of the UBPBFSMR
[ ] Strongly do not support the increase in enforcement
78
[ ] Do not support the increase in enforcement
[ ] Support the increase in enforcement
[ ] Strongly support the increase in enforcement
[ ] Unsure
(30) What do you think of the size of the UBPBFSMR
[ ] Too Big
[ ] Too Small
[ ] Just the right size
[ ] Unsure
[ ] N/A
(31) What do you think of the location of the UBPBFSMR
[ ] In the right place (saktong lugar)
[ ] In the wrong place (salang lugar)
[ ] Unsure (di sigurado)
[ ] N/A
(32) Who should primarily enforce the rules and regulations of the UBPBFSMR
[ ] Coastguard
[ ] Fishers/Gleaners
[ ] Bantay dagat (licensed enforcers)
[ ] National Police
[ ] Local village officials
[ ] Other ________________
(33) Who would you trust most to head and govern the UBPBFSMR Management Committee
[ ] Community members
[ ] Fishers/Gleaners
[ ] Local village officials
[ ] Local government officials
[ ] Other ________________
(34) Has your catch increased, decreased or stayed the same as a result of the UBPBFSMR (If the person does not fish or glean mark
as NA)
[ ] Decreased (nagbawas)[ ] Increased (nagdakol) [ ] Stayed the Same (parehas) [ ] N/A
(35) CUSTOMIZE according to BC and BR: I am going to read to you a number of activities, and I would like you to tell me whether you
would find it easy or difficult for you to do that
A) Attend at least 6 meetings of the UBPBFSMR Management Committee in 12 months
( [ ] Easy (madali)
[ ] Difficult (dipisil)
[ ] Not sure (di sigurado)
[ ] Not applicable
B) Run a UBPBFSMR Committee every month (mapadalagan an komitiba sa UBPBFSMR kada bulan)
[ ] Easy (madali)
[ ] Difficult (dipisil)
[ ] Not sure (di sigurado)
[ ] Not applicable
C) Participate in other UBPBFSMR related activities such as public consultations and coastal clean-ups (ma-iba kung igwa
aktibidad na may kinaaraman sa UBPBFSMR kaiba an meeting, coastal clean-ups, etc)
[ ] Easy (madali)
[ ] Difficult (dipisil)
[ ] Not sure (di sigurado)
[ ] Not applicable
79
D) Report violations of rules and regulations such as intrusions into UBPBFSMR (masumbong kung igwa makita na biolasyon
siring kan pagsira sa laog kan UBPBFSMR)
[ ] Easy (madali) [ ] Difficult (dipisil)
[ ] Not sure (di sigurado)
[ ] Not applicable
(36) COHORT QUESTION - I am going to read you a number of statements about the management of the local no take zone. For each
statement, I would like you to tell me if you strongly agree (SA), agree (A), disagree (D), or strongly disagree (SD) with it.
a. There is a clear plan for how the no take zone will be managed
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
b. Local village fishers regularly participate in management decisions
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
of the no take zone)
c. Local people know boundaries of the no take zone
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
d. There was not enough planning done before the no take zone was
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
established
e. There is enough money and other resources to fully manage and
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
enforce the rules of the no take zone
f. The rules of the no take zone are regularly enforced so that
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
violators are caught and punished
g. The rules of the no take zone are unclear and local fishers don't
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
understand them
h. The rules of the no take zone are designed more to protect the fish
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
than to help the fishers
i. The infrastructure, equipment and facilities to enforce the rules of
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
the no take zone are adequate
j. There is an adequate communications program about the no take
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
zone
k. Staff of the no take zone are adequately trained
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
l. There is a regular management effectiveness assessment
conducted for the no take zone
m. Research & monitoring activities of the no take area are adequate
n. There are no current problems with the no take zone management
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
SECTION 7 - ESTABLISH BASELINES FOR AND MEASURE CHANGE IN INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION SMART
OBJECTIVES
(37) CUSTOMIZE to IC objectives in TOC - In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about benefits to the community
of a well enforced sanctuary? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this. Sa naka aging
anom na bulan may kinahoron ka manongod sa benepisyo ki sanktwaryong dagat na napakaray an pagpalakaw? Kun iyo
sisay an naka horon mo?
80
[ ] Have not talked to anyone (Wara ki nakahoron maski sisay)
[ ] Talked to spouse/partner (nakistorya sa agom)
[ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws (nakistorya sa ugangan)
[ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or older (nakistorya sa mga anak 16 anyos pataas)
[ ] Talked to your children aged 15 or younger (nakistorya sa mga anak 15 anyos pababa)
[ ] Talked to friend or neighbor (nakistorya sa amigo asin pagtaraning)
[ ] Talked to village elder or local authority (nakistorya sa gurang/membro sa Brgy.Council)
[ ] Talked to National government environmental officials (nakistorya sa goberno)
[ ] Talked to Non-government environment officials (nakistorya sa NGO opisyales)
[ ] Talked to Local government environmental officials (nakistorya sa local na opisyales)
[ ] Talked to a Local fisher or Gleaner (nakistorya sa taga Uson na mananagat)
[ ] Other _________________________________
A) If you did talk about this, can you tell me what the main thing was you discussed (ano man an napaghoronan nindo
manogod kaini?)
______________________________________________________________________________
( 37) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about your role in reporting intrusions in the UBPBFSMR to the enforcement
team in order to benefit the community? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this. Sa
naka aging anom na bulan may kinahoron ka manongod sa papel mo sa pagreport sa mga pagbalgar kI lei ki
sanktwaryong dagat mga nagapalakaw kaini? Kun iyo sisay an maka horon mo?
[ ] Have not talked to anyone (Wara ki nakahoron maski sisay)
[ ] Talked to spouse/partner (nakistorya sa agom)
[ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws (nakistorya sa ugangan)
[ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or older (nakistorya sa mga anak 16 anyos pataas)
[ ] Talked to your children aged 15 or younger (nakistorya sa mga anak 15 anyos pababa)
[ ] Talked to friend or neighbor (nakistorya sa amigo asin pagtaraning)
[ ] Talked to village elder or local authority (nakistorya sa gurang/membro sa Brgy.Council)
[ ] Talked to National government environmental officials (nakistorya sa goberno)
[ ] Talked to Non-government environment officials (nakistorya sa NGO opisyales)
[ ] Talked to Local government environmental officials (nakistorya sa local na opisyales)
[ ] Talked to a Local fisher or Gleaner (nakistorya sa taga Uson na mananagat)
[ ] Other _________________________________
A.If you did talk about this, can you tell me what the main thing was you discussed (ano man an napaghoronan nindo manogod
kaini?) _______________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
38. In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about "the consequences of breaking the UBPBFSMR rules &
regulations"? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this. Sa naka aging anom na
bulan may kinahoron ka manongod sa sa mga pagbalgar kI lei ki sanktwaryong dagat? Kun iyo sisay an maka horon mo?
81
[ ] Have not talked to anyone (Wara ki nakahoron maski sisay)
[ ] Talked to spouse/partner (nakistorya sa agom)
[ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws (nakistorya sa ugangan)
[ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or older (nakistorya sa mga anak 16 anyos pataas)
[ ] Talked to your children aged 15 or younger (nakistorya sa mga anak 15 anyos pababa)
[ ] Talked to friend or neighbor (nakistorya sa amigo asin pagtaraning)
[ ] Talked to village elder or local authority (nakistorya sa gurang/membro sa Brgy.Council)
[ ] Talked to National government environmental officials (nakistorya sa goberno)
[ ] Talked to Non-government environment officials (nakistorya sa NGO opisyales)
[ ] Talked to Local government environmental officials (nakistorya sa local na opisyales)
[ ] Talked to a Local fisher or Gleaner (nakistorya sa taga Uson na mananagat)
[ ] Other _________________________________
A.If you did talk about this, can you tell me what the main thing was you discussed (ano man an napaghoronan nindo manogod
kaini?) __________________________________________________
39. In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about "your own role in managing your local marine resources"? If you have,
please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this.
[ ] Have not talked to anyone (Wara ki nakahoron maski sisay)
[ ] Talked to spouse/partner (nakistorya sa agom)
[ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws (nakistorya sa ugangan)
[ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or older (nakistorya sa mga anak 16 anyos pataas)
[ ] Talked to your children aged 15 or younger (nakistorya sa mga anak 15 anyos pababa)
[ ] Talked to friend or neighbor (nakistorya sa amigo asin pagtaraning)
[ ] Talked to village elder or local authority (nakistorya sa gurang/membro sa Brgy.Council)
[ ] Talked to National government environmental officials (nakistorya sa goberno)
[ ] Talked to Non-government environment officials (nakistorya sa NGO opisyales)
[ ] Talked to Local government environmental officials (nakistorya sa local na opisyales)
[ ] Talked to a Local fisher or Gleaner (nakistorya sa taga Uson na mananagat)
[ ] Other _________________________________
A.If you did talk about this, can you tell me what the main thing was you discussed (ano man an napaghoronan nindo manogod
kaini?) __________________________________________________
SECTION 8 - ESTABLISH BASELINES FOR AND MEASURE CHANGE IN BEHAVIOR SMART OBJECTIVES
40. COHORT QUESTION - SHOW MAP LABELLED A – I am going to read you a list of different types of fishers, and for each
one, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing someone like that fishing in this area in the past 6 months.
Please answer S for Seen, NS for Not seen, and NS/DR for Not sure/Don't remember (show the No Take Zone (NTZ) on a
map of the area but don't mention whether it is NTZ or not) . Basahan ta ika ki mga mga klase ki parasira na pwede
82
mong nailing sa laog ki anom na bulan sa mapa na ini. An simbag po nakailing (s), dae naka iling (ns) o dae na
maromodoman dae sigurado (ns/dr)
a. Subsistence fishers from your village mga sadit na parasira
b. Subsistence fishers from nearby villages mga sadit na parasira sa harani
sa Uson
c. Subsistence fishers from outside areas mga saradit na parasira na taga
luwas kan Uson
d. Small-scale commercial fishers from your village mga sadit na
commercial fishers
e. Small scale commercial fishers from nearby village sadit na commercial
fishers harani sa Uson
f. Small scale commercial fishers from outside areas mga saradit na
commercial fishers hale sa luwas kan Uson
g. Commercial fishers using trawls, ring net, etc (commercial fishers na
minagamit ki trawl, bulibuli)
h. Large-scale industrial fishers using large trawls, purse seiner darakulang
parasira na minagamit ki hulbot hulbot, trawl
i. Sports / Game fishers targeting Tuna, Bill fish, marlins etc para pana na
mina banwit ki darakula na mga sira siring kan tuna asin iba pa na
nagsisira sa lawod
j. Other resource users specializing in target fish such as aquarium fish,
mollusks (trochus) and live fish, lobster, etc mga para sisid na minadakop
ki buhay na sira, lobster asin mga darakulang shell o budyong
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
41. I am going to read you a list of different types of fishers, and for each one, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing
someone like that fishing in this area in the past 1 year. Basahan ta ika ki mga mga klase ki parasira na pwede mong nailing
sa laog ki sarong taon sa lugar nindo. An simbag po nakailing (s), dae naka iling (ns) o dae na maromodoman dae
sigurado (ns/dr)
Please answer S for Seen, NS for Not seen, and NS/DR for Not sure/Don't remember (show an area that is NOT a NTZ on a map
of the area but don’t mention whether it is NTZ or not) COHORT QUESTION
k. Subsistence fishers from your village mga sadit na parasira
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
l. Subsistence fishers from nearby villages mga sadit na parasira sa harani
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
sa Uson
m. Subsistence fishers from outside areas mga saradit na parasira na taga
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
luwas kan Uson
n. Small-scale commercial fishers from your village mga sadit na
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
commercial fishers
o. Small scale commercial fishers from nearby village sadit na commercial
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
83
fishers harani sa Uson
p. Small scale commercial fishers from outside areas mga saradit na
commercial fishers hale sa luwas kan Uson
q. Commercial fishers using trawls, ring net, etc (commercial fishers na
minagamit ki trawl, bulibuli)
r. Large-scale industrial fishers using large trawls, purse seiner darakulang
parasira na minagamit ki hulbot hulbot, trawl
s. Sports / Game fishers targeting Tuna, Bill fish, marlins etc para pana na
mina banwit ki darakula na mga sira siring kan tuna asin iba pa na
nagsisira sa lawod
t. Other resource users specializing in target fish such as aquarium fish,
mollusks (trochus) and live fish, lobster, etc mga para sisid na minadakop
ki buhay na sira, lobster asin mga darakulang shell o budyong
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
[ ]S [ ]NS [ ]NS/DR
42. COHORT QUESTION – During the past 6 months, would you say that you have been regularly involved, occasionally
involved, or not involved with the creation and/or the management of a no-take fishing area in your local area (sa naka
aging dose na bulan, masasabi mo na regular kang kaiba, paminsan minsa na kaiba sa pagmukna ni manihamiento
sa UBPBFSMR
43.
[ ] Regularly involved (kaiba pirmi)
[ ] Never involved (dae maiba)
[ ] Occasionally involved (paminsan minsan lang)
[ ] Don't know/not applicable
44. In the past 12 months, have you attended any meetings related to UBPBFSMR Management, how many times did you attend? (sa
naka aging dose na bulan, pirang beses naka atendir sa meeting manongod sa UBPBFSMR?
45. [ ] Never attended a meeting
[ ] Attended at least 1 meeting
[ ] Attended at between 2-5 meetings
[ ] Attended at least 6 meetings
[ ] More than 7 meetings
[ ] Not applicable
46. In the past 12 months, have you attended the reef assessment of the UBPBFSMR about how many times did you attend? (sa naka
aging dose na bulan, pirang beses naka atendir sa meeting manongod sa UBPBFSMR?
[ ] Never attended any assessment
[ ] Attended at least once
[ ] Attended at between twice
[ ] Attended at least thrice
[ ] More than thrice
[ ] Not applicable
47. If you were to report someone who has broken the rules & regulations of the UBPBFSMR, who would you report them to? (kung
ika ma report na may nag balga kan lei buda regulasyon sa UBPBFSMR kisay ka ma report? [YOU CAN CHOOSE MORE
THAN ONE ANSWER].
[ ] Local police
[ ] Local law enforcement
[ ] Kapitan
[ ] Municipal mayor
84
[ ] Next door neighbor (pagtaraning)
[ ] Husband/Wife
[ ] Myembro kan local na manihamiento kan UBPBFSMR
[ ] Dae ma Report
[ ] Other ________________
48. In the last six months have you heard of anyone reporting someone breaking the UBPBFSMR rules & regulations to the
enforcement team? (sa naka aging anom na bulan, nakadangog ka na igwang nag report na igwa ki mga pag balga kan mga
lei asin regulasyon sa UBPBFSMR?)
[ ] Yes [ ] No
SECTION 9 - UNDERSTAND BARRIERS & BENEFITS OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE
49. CUSTOMIZE TO THE BR STRATEGY - What benefits might there be in establishing a UBPBFSMR Management Committee?
Ano sa hiling mo an pwede makuang benepisyo sa pag establisir ki Management Committee sa UBPBFSMR?) (Write in
one or more answer, None or Don’t Know)
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
50. CUSTOMIZE TO THE BR STRATEGY - What barriers might there be in establishing a UBPBFSMR Management Committee?
(Ano sa hiling mo an pwede maka ulang sa pag establisir ki Management Committee sa UBPBFSMR (Write in one or more
answer, None or Don’t Know)
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
51. CUSTOMIZE TO SITE If you were to encourage a friend to stop intruding in the MPA to fish, what would you suggest would be a
good incentive? (kung ika hapoton, ano an marhay na paagi na mainganyar an mga parasira na dae na mag dakop ki sira
sa laog kan UBPBFSMR)
[ ] receive public recognition by the Mayor (Makakuha ki pagmidbid sa publiko sa paagi ni Mayor)
[ ] receive public recognition in the media (Makakiuha ki pagmidbid sa paagi kan radyo)
[ ] be celebrated at a fiesta (iselebrar kasabay sa fiesta)
[ ] receive an award (tawanan ki premyo o pagmidbid)
[ ] knowing that you are protecting the food security of the children in the community Maogma nan a maka contribuer sa pagdakol ki
sira para sa masurunod na henerasyon
[ ] more and bigger fish in the future
Mas dakol buda mas darakula na sira sa maabot na panahon
[ ] Other ________________
85
52. CUSTOMIZE TO SITE If you were to encourage a friend to take part in the MPA management meetings, what would you suggest
would be a good incentive? (kung ika an hahapoton, ano an marhay na pabuya tanganing maingganyo an mga tawo na mag
atendir ki meeting kan UBPBFSMR
[ ] receive public recognition by the Mayor (Makakuha ki pagmidbid sa publiko sa poaagi ni Mayor)
[ ] receive public recognition in the media (Makakiuha ki pagmidbid sa paagi kan radyo)
[ ] be celebrated at a fiesta (iselebrar kasabay sa fiesta)
[ ] receive an award (tawanan ki premyo o pagmidbid)
[ ] knowing that you are protecting the food security of the children in the community Maogma nan a maka contribuer sa pagdakol ki
sira para sa masurunod na henerasyon
[ ] more and bigger fish in the future
Mas dakol buda mas darakula na sira sa maabot na panahon
[ ] Other ________________
SECTION 10 - EXPOSURE TO CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES & MESSAGES
53. I am going to ask you about a number of ways in which you may or may not have seen or heard about the UBPBFSMR. For each
method, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing or hearing that source in the past 6 months.
a. Traditional Music
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
b. Local News
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
c. National News
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
d. Sports
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
e. Religious Media Program
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
f. Talk Show Program
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
g. Puppet Show
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
h. Locally Produced Video
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
i. Poster or Billboard
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
j. Printed Booklet
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
k. Public Meeting (Festival)
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
l. Celebrity/Soap Star/Entertainer
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
m. SMS on your phone
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] Don't know
54. Of all of the different ways in which you remember seeing or hearing about UBPBFSMR in the past 6 months, which one, if any, did
you think had the most impact on you? ________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
55. Of all the different ways in which you learned about UBPBFSMR in the past 6 months, what do you think was the most important
message that you learned from them? ______________________________
86
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
SECTION 11 - GROUND TRUTHING - NO OBJECTIVE
56. Please name 3 creatures that live in the sea that you are particularly fond or proud of. (do not read out options but tick box as
appropriate and/or fill in the blank for any additional answers) - FLAGSHIP SPECIES QUESTION 1st Option
[ ] snapper (bukhawon)
[ ] giant sea clam (taklobo, hagdanan)
[ ] parrot fish (mulmul)
[ ] sea turtle (pawikan)
[ ] sweet lips (lipti)
[ ] red grouper (suno)
[ ] rabbitfish -siganids (koyog)
[ ] lobster (banagan)
[ ] moray eel (palos)
[ ] Other (iba pa) ________________
a. Please have a look at the 4 photographs labeled A,B,C,D. Which of the sea creatures shown on the photograph do you like
best? – FLAGSHIP SP QUESTION - 2nd OPTION (Involved providing enumerators with labeled images)
[ ] A (snapper)
[ ] B (giant sea clam)
[ ] C (parrot fish)
[ ] D (sea turtle)
[ ] E (sweet lips)
[ ] F (red grouper)
[ ] G (rabbitfish)
[ ] lobster (banagan)
[ ] Other (iba pa) ________________
57. COHORT QUESTION - I am going to read you a number of strategies that might help solve any possible current problems in the
management of your local no-take area. For each strategy, I would like you to tell me if you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or
strongly disagree that it would help solve any current problems with managing the no-take area.
Igwa ako ki babasahon na mga istratehiya na pwedeng makatabang na maresolbar an manehamiento kan UBPBFSMR. Sa
lambang babasahon, taramon mop o kun mina uyon ka ki marhay, uyon ka, dae ka uyon, daeng dae ka uyon o dae ka ki
masasabi o kasimbagan
a. Increased local community involvement in management
of the no take zone Pakikisumaro kan mga taga barangay
sa pagmanehar kan UBPBFSMR
b. Limiting involvement in management of the no take zone
to fishers only An mamenahar kan UBPBFSMR mga para
sira sana
c. Increased and strict law enforcement of the no take zone
rules by Police/Navy and Enforcers
Dugangan an parabantay buda pakosogon an
pagpasunod kan lei kan mga pulis asin iba pa ba bantay
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
87
d. Increased and strict law enforcement of rules by local
community fishers with enforcement rights
Dugangan an pagpartisipar kan local na komunidad sa
pagpasunod kan lei
e. Develop new rules for the no take zone in a process that
includes the whole community
Magmukna ki bago na mga panuntunan sa paagi nin
sarong proseso na masakob sa mga miyembro sa
komunidad
f. Change the size and/or the location of the no take zone
Bagohon an pinamugtakan kan UBPBFSMR asin
bagohon an sakop na lugar kan ini
g. Make sure that local fishers have the exclusive right to
fish in the areas around the no take zone
Siyertuhon na an mga parasira igwa ki exclusibong
diretso na magsira sa palibot kan UBPBFSMR
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
SECTION 12 - CLIMATE CHANGE
58. Do you strongly agree (SA), agree (A), disagree (D), strongly disagree (SD), Not sure/Don't know (NS/DK) with the following
statement:
a. Climate change is not going to cause any problems in my
community
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
An pagbago ki klima makakapagdara ki problema sa arin
man na komunidad
b. Climate change is already a problem in my community
An pagbago ki klima saro na namamatean na problema
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
sa komunidad
c. Climate change is likely to become a real problem for my
community in the coming 5-10 years
[ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
An pagbago ki klima siguradong magiging problema sa
komunidad sa maabot na 5-10 taon
d. If our local NTZ is well managed it will help buffer some
of the effects of climate change in the future
Kun an UBPBFSMR marhay an palakaw, matabang ini na [ ]SA [ ]A [ ]D [ ]SD [ ]NS/DK
makabawas sa maraot na epekto kan pagbago ki klima
sa maabot na panahon
88
59. Name up to 3 ways in which you believe climate change could affect your community in the next 5-10 years. (DO NOT READ
OPTIONS, SELECT UP TO 3)
Anu ano po sa imong pagmati an mga pwedeng mangyari na maka apekto sa komunidad sa maabot na lima hanggang
sampolong taon?
[ ] sea level rise ( permanenteng pagtaas kan tubig sa dagat)
[ ] increased water temperature leading death of corals and less fish (pag init kan tubig na ma kausa kan pagkagadan kan mga
bahura asin madulot ki pagdiit kan sira sa dagat)
[ ] increase of typhoon frequency (madakol an bilang kan bagyo na ma agi sa lugar na ini)
[ ] increase of typhoon strength, less reliable work and crops (Mas makosog an mga bagyo, madiit an trabaho asin an mga
pananom ma apektuhan
[ ] more people from the upland will move to the coastal areas in case of crop failure
An mga naka istar sa bolod malipat sa tampi kan dagat kun magdiit an aning pananom
[ ] change in weather patterns
Mabago an panahon
[ ] less rain mas diit an uran
[ ] Other ________________
iba pa:__________________
[ ] N/A
Dios Mabalos po!
89
Photos of KAP Survey conducted in three villages covered by the MPA
90
2. Executive Order for TWG & Mancom
(Insert the Executive Order Document and/or other legal documents that outline the composition, roles and establishment of
the TWG and Mancom (and Management Council if applicable))
3. Survey results
(Refer to Result sections template in Lola, p 49-83)
Summary of Results
The survey sampled a cross section of the Uson Buang Pongco Bonga community, with and even split between men and women.
The sample size represents four target audiences distributed as TA1: fishers (92); organized community members (92); coastal
residents (243) and TA4 (10).
91
92
Target Audience occupation
93
94
95
Media Preferences of target Audiences
96
What about the other trusted sources? Please include all graphs
97
Practices
98
99
100
Please comments whether you think the data above from the stages of behavior question is reliable
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
This graph is mislabeled. Should read something like “% of TA who have seen different types of fishers inside the MPA”. Also please
include full graph (options E, F, etc). Not sure why in your SMART objectives you used the option on fisgers targeting mollusks instead
of the option A and B above, as these % are really high.
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
4. EcoGov MPA Effectiveness Rating
Management Focus
Management Plan
Management Body
Legal Instrument and support
Community Participation
Financing
IEC
Enforcement
Monitoring and evaluation
Maintenance of infrastructure and
site development
Relevant indicators
4, 10, 27, 38, 39
5, 11, 20, 29,32, 40
6, 9, 37, 41
1, 3, 8
12, 19, 28, 35, 49
7, 14, 23, 44, 45, 46
13, 15, 21, 25, 26, 30, 36
2, 18, 24, 33, 34, 42, 43
16, 17, 22, 31, 47, 48
Total
Available
points
9
10
6
7
7
12
19
9
6
Actual Score per
Management
Focus
1
1
5
7
3
0
7
2
2
Actual Score divided
by Total Available
Points
11.1%
10.0%
83.3%
100.0%
42.9%
0.0%
36.8%
22.2%
33.3%
85
Please add full criteria and scoring in your appendix
5. Letters of Support
(Insert any letters of support for the campaign by key partners, politicians etc) (reference Lola p 169)
136
137
6. Threat Ranking
Scope, Severity & Irreversibility
Each threat is ranked by Scope, Severity and Irreversibility against each target using the following scoring guide:
KEY TO THREAT CRITERIA (Based on Miradi definitions)
A: SCOPE (Area)
4 = Very High: The threat is likely to be very widespread across all or much of your site.
3 = High: The threat is likely to be widespread in its scope, and affect conservation targets at many locations at your site.
2 = Medium: The threat is likely to be localized in its scope, and affect the conservation target at some of the target’s
locations at the site.
1 = Low: The threat is likely to be very localized in its scope, and affect the conservation target at a limited portion of the
target’s location at the site.
B: SEVERITY – The level of damage to the conservation target that can reasonably be expected under current
circumstances (i.e., given the continuation of the existing situation).
4 = Very High: The threat is likely to destroy or eliminate the conservation target over some portion of the target’s
occurrence at the site.
3 = High: The threat is likely to seriously degrade the conservation target over some portion of the target’s occurrence at the
site.
2 = Medium: The threat is likely to moderately degrade the conservation target over some portion of the target’s occurrence
at the site.
1 = Low: The threat is likely to only slightly impair the conservation target over some portion of the target’s occurrence at the
site.
C: IRREVERSIBILITY – The importance of taking immediate action to counter the threat.
4 = Very High: The effects of the direct threat are not reversible (e.g., wetlands converted to a shopping center).
3 = High: The effects of the direct threat are reversible, but not practically affordable (e.g., wetland converted to agriculture).
2 = Medium: The effects of the direct threat are reversible with a reasonable commitment of resources (e.g., ditching and
draining of wetland).
1 = Low: The effects of the direct threat are easily reversible at relatively low cost (e.g., off-road vehicles trespassing in
wetland).
(Insert jpeg from your Miradi threat ranking with brief summary explanation; include experts consulted and any
assumptions made; if factor chains are not aligned with content of plan the explain any discrepancies) (reference
138
Serena island p35)
Poison fishing as a practice never came out in the KAP survey nor in focus group discussion. This was disclosed during the
pre-University Phase when the CF conducted a structured interview to key informants. There sre about ten fishers practicing this but they
claimed they were not from any of the MPA covered villsages. However, since they target species that inevitably use cyanide poison, the
item on the threat ranking on poison fishing is considered top priority.This was the basis of identifying fishers as the primary audience
apart from the fact that the campaign is done by a cohort. The poison fishers are not expected to come out in the open so that fishers as
population in this campaign makes sense.
139
7. Factor Chain
(Insert jpeg from your Miradi factor chains with brief summary explanation; include experts consulted and any
assumptions made; if factor chains are not aligned with content of plan the explain any discrepancies) (reference
Serena island p38)
140
Republic of the Philippines
Province of Albay
Municipality of Bacacay
OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL MAYOR
CREATING THE BACACAY MPA MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, MANDATING ITS FUNCTIONS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
WHEREAS, Article II, Section 16 of the 1987 Constitution provides that the State shall protect and advance the right
of the people to a balanced and healthful ecology in accordance with the rhythm and harmony of nature;
WHEREAS, the Local Government Code of 1991 or Republic Act No. 7160, devolves the management of the
municipal waters and its fisheries and aquatic resources to the municipal government;
WHEREAS, the Philippine Fisheries Code of 1998 or Republic Act 8550, mandates that the municipal government
may enact appropriate ordinances which shall ensure the sustainable development, management and conservation of its
territorial waters including its fisheries and aquatic resources;
WHEREAS, the municipality of Bacacay enacted Municipal Ordinance (MO) No. 197 series of 2002 which provides
for the establishment and management of the Uson Buang Pongco Bonga Fish Sanctuary and Marine Reserve;
WHEREAS, the Bacacay LGU in partnership with the Barangay Local Government of Uson and RARE Incorporated
implements a two-year Bacacay Marine Sanctuary Pride Program;
WHEREAS, effective and sustained governance and enforcement of marine sanctuaries in Bacacay is an essential
component for the successful and meaningful implementation of the two-year Bacacay Marine Sanctuary Pride Program;
141
WHEREAS, there is still a need to clearly delineate the policy-making and implementing components of the
management body and to encourage the participation of various sectors in the management of the marine sanctuaries;
NOW, THEREFORE, premises considered, and by virtue of the powers vested in me by law, I, Hon. Tobias Betito, Mayor of Bacacay, do hereby order the following:
Section 1. CREATION and COMPOSITION. There is hereby created a Bacacay MPA Management Committee (MC) that
shall serve as the implementing unit of the management body managing the Bacacay Marine Sanctuary. The MC shall
serve as the implementing unit of the management body, while the TWG serves as the policy-making unit. The MC shall be
composed of a municipal level management executive committee that shall consist of the following:
Municipal level executive committee:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Municipal Agriculturist or his/her representative
Municipal Environmental Management Office (MENRO) or representative
SB Chair Committee on Environment
Barangay Captain of Uson or representative
Bgy Captain of Buang or representative
Bgy. Captain of Pongco Bonga or representative
The barangay level MC shall be composed of the following:
1. Members of the Barangay Council
2. People’s Organizations
3. Members of the BFARMC
4. Representatives of the Bantay dagat in the area
5. School teachers
6. Purok leaders
7. Representative from a women’s organization in the area
8. Representative of the Youth organization in the area
9. Representative of the religious group in the area
10. Senior citizens
11. Business organization
Section 2. FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES. The Bacacay MPA Management Committee shall enforce the rules
and regulations pertaining to the protection, maintenance, and conservation of the marine sanctuaries in the municipality and
supervise day-to-day operations with the following specific functions and responsibilities;
Municipal level MC:
142
a) Prepare and implement the Bacacay MPA Annual Investment Plan and Budget based on the long-term
Management Plan prepared by the Bacacay MPA TWG;
b) Assist in the facilitation of meetings at the barangay level MC activities;
c) Propose and recommend policy initiatives to the Barangay, Municipal Legislative Councils and the Bacacay MPA
TWG;
d) Supervise the conduct of regular patrolling and guarding of the MPA done by barangay and municipal
enforcement teams;
e) Supervise the conduct of regular biophysical and socio-economic surveys;
f) Conduct orientation and training workshops on MPA-related activities;
g) Supervise the conduct of Information, Education and Communication Campaign;
h) Prepare proposals for submission to the Bacacay MPA TWG for their resource generation activities;
i) Prepare activity and financial reports to be submitted to the Bacacay MPA TWG;
j) Coordinate with the Barangay level Management Committees;
k) Perform such functions as deemed necessary
Barangay level organizations
1. Conduct regular patrolling in the marine sanctuaries
2. Encourage barangay governments to incorporate MPA management related activities in the barangay annual
investment plan
3. Conduct regular biophysical and socio-economic monitoring with assistance from Bacacay MPA TWG
4. Conduct IEC-related activities
5. Collect user fees in accordance with the relevant municipal ordinances and remit to the MLGU their share of the
collected fees
6. Implement environmental-friendly livelihood activities supportive of MPA management with assistance from MLGU
and national agencies
7. Maintain the patrol boat, billboards, buoys and guardhouse
8. Coordinate with the municipal level MC
Section 3. OFFICERS AND TERMS OF OFFICE. The Bacacay MPA MC shall be led by the Municipal Agriculture Office.
The Municipal Agriculture Office shall serve as the secretariat of the MC. The MEC at the barangay level shall be led by the
Chair of the Bgy Development Council. The MC members at the barangay shall sign up for membership in the four (4)
subcommittees. The subcommittees of the MC at the local level shall be elected by the members of the PO. The term of
office of the local level MC chairperson and subcommittee chairperson shall be two years.
Section 4. REPLACEMENT OF OFFICERS. Non-performing MC Officers at both the municipal and local level may be
replaced by the Local Chief Executive with reasonable cause and upon recommendation of the TWG.
143
Section 5. MEETINGS. The Bacacay MPA MEC at the municipal shall meet at least once month. The MCs at the local
levels shall also meet regularly at least once a month. The MC members shall hold a regular meeting upon proper notice
from the chairperson.
Section 5. MPA MANAGEMENT SUBCOMMITTEES. The municipal level MEC shall coordinate the activities of the
subcommittees at the local barangay level. The MC at the barangay level shall consist of the following subcommittees: 1]
Law Enforcement and Maintenance, 2] IEC/ Capability Building, 3] Resource Monitoring and Evaluation, 4] Livelihood and
Ecotourism. The subcommittees at the barangay levels shall perform the following functions:
Law Enforcement and Maintenance
 Regular guarding and patrolling within the marine sanctuary
 Maintain a logbook system for the enforcement activities in the MPA
 Apprehension of violators of the marine sanctuary ordinance
 Ensure that bantay dagat members are properly trained and deputized
 Repair and replace dilapidated/destroyed buoy/markers, patrol boats, and other infrastructure related to the MPA
 Act as witness during court litigation
Resource Monitoring and Evaluation:
 Conduct regular monitoring of the biophysical status of the marine sanctuary,
 Conduct regular monitoring of the socio-economic status of the fishers in the area;
 Retrieve waste and other non-biodegradable materials at the bottom of the marine sanctuary that are detrimental to
the growth of corals,
IEC/Capacity Building
 Conduct regular information dissemination within their respective barangays regarding the MPA,
 Disseminate information on the different activities that are allowed and prohibited in the marine sanctuary
 Keep records such as management plans, financial reports, enforcement logbooks, minutes of meetings, ordinances,
resolutions, pictures, videos, etc.
Livelihood/Ecotourism Committee
 Recommend project ideas and prepare project proposals for the financial sustainability of the management of the
MPA
 Oversee the expenditure related to MPA management based on the MPA management plan and budget
 Track all revenues generated by the MPA and make a report on its application
 Supervise the collection of user fees
144
 Oversee the implementation of livelihood activities in the area
 Monitor and report the progress of all livelihood projects in the area.
Section 7. SOURCES OF FUNDS AND ACCOUNTING SYSTEM. The Municipal and Barangay Governments shall
allocate annually funds to implement the Bacacay Marine Sanctuary Management Plan and other necessary activities of the
Management Committee. The application of funds shall follow the regular government accounting procedures. The
expenses incurred in the conduct of monthly meetings at the barangay level shall be shouldered primarily by the PO and
supported by the municipal government.
Section 8. OBLIGATION OF THE BARANGAY GOVERNMENTS. The barangay governments of Uson, Buang and
Pongco-Bunga are obliged to allocate funding for the management of the MPA and to support its management.
Section 9. This Executive Order shall take effect immediately upon signing hereof.”
Done this ___________________ at Bacacay, Albay, Philippines.
HON. TOBIAS C. BETITO
Municipal Mayo
145
Download