Techniques, Isoquants, and Cost Curves © 2010 Peter Berck Definitions • Output Q; specific amount Q* • Inputs x= (x1…xn) • If using inputs x results in output Q*, then x is a technique to make Q*. – 1 brisket, 1 pan, 3 hours of oven services at 375, 1 large sheet foil, 4 coarsely sliced onions, salt, pepper, paprika are a technique for making pot roast. (Esther Lipow’s (z’’l) recipe.) Efficient • If x is less than or equal to y in every dimension and x and y both produce Q*, then y is not efficient. – xi yi for every i y input 2 x input 1 Isoquant • Let Q* be some specific output like 4 units • All efficient input combinations that produce Q* are the Q*th isoquant Find points on same isoquant for Corn Yield in lbs. Lbs P2O5 40 80 120 160 Lbs N 80 82.3 95.9 102.4 105.4 120 86.7 102.1 110.1 114.2 160 88.5 105.4 114.5 119.6 200 88.6 106.8 116.9 122.9 Rice Milling • Why mill rice at all? • What is wrong with white rice from a nutritional point of view? Techniques for Milling Rice Technique Hand Pound Investment 0 Laborers 45.83 Technique Large Mill Investment 29,675 Laborers 5.25 Notes: Small Mill 9,359 13.95 Small Bulk 44,335 2.64 Large Bulk 77,835 1.17 Source P. Timmer Choice of Technique in Rice Milling in Java. Techniques to produce Rp 10 Million in Value added . Investment in USD. Laborers is the number of workers each and every year. Milling • Does a rice mill and hand pounding produce the same white rice product? Which would you rather buy? • Why is this in value added rather than tons? – VA = Revenue – Cost of materials Investment Costs Isoquant for Rice Milling 90000 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 0 10 20 30 Laborers 40 50 What Technique Minimizes Cost • Need prices for labor and investment • Price of investment is 1. Plant is assumed to last 50 years with no maintenance (urrg.) • Price of 50 years worth of labor is calculated as the size of bank account (with 24% interest) that would pay a laborer $200 per year for 50 years. It is $833 per laborer Interest Rates • Is 24% per year a high interest rate for a developing country? • Are there investment clubs in the US that charge their members 2.5% per month? Outlay or Isocost Line • All input combinations of K, investment, and L, laborers, that cost amount E, an unknown, are given by • E = K + $833 L • More generally: • E = Pk K + P L L About equi-cost or outlay lines • E = Pk K + PL L • K = E/Pk - L PL/PK – So varying E (which is not known) gives a family of parallel equi-outlay lines – The cost of every input bundle on the line is the vertical intercept times PK. – When PK conveniently equals one, the vertical intercept is the cost of every bundle on the line Which line? • The least cost way of producing output Q* is found by finding the equi-cost line tangent to the Q*th isoquant. • C(Q*) is the cost of any input bundle on that line • The input bundle (or technique) at the tangency is the least cost way to produce Q* Investment Costs Small Rice Mill Costs Least 90000 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 Small Mill Hand 0 10 20 30 Laborers 40 50 Story: • • • • Widows used to hand pound rice. Now SRM’s are used instead. How is this bad? How is this good? Isoquant and Production Function • The Q* isoquant: { x | x is an efficient technique and x produces Q*} • Production function: Q = F(x). Output as function of (efficient) input bundles – {x| F(x) = Q*, x efficient} is also isoquant – Isoquant is level curve of production function – see the physical model Cost function is the • Minimum amount of money necessary to buy the inputs that will produce output Q. – Answer is amount of money as function of Q • Isocost line, I: {x | I = p1x1 + p2x2} – Straight line • Intercept I/p2 • Slope - p1/p2 Pollution in an isoquant world • Two goods – Other stuff – Clean Air Services • negative of pollution • air has 1 ppm of gunk –polluton • air has 99 ppm of non-gunk – cleanth Cost Min Technique Price of “Other Stuff” = 2 120 Other Stuff 100 Low Isocost Med. Isocost High Isocost 80 60 40 20 0 Equations for 3 lines. Cost of 0 Chosen bundle? 20 40 Air 60 Isocost Lines: Price of “Other Stuff” = 2 120 Blue Isocost: slope -2=- p1/p2; p1 = 4; I = Low Isocost 80*2=160; 160 =4 Air + 2 OS Med. Green Isocost: 200 = 4 Air + 2 OS Isocost High .Red Isocost: 120 = 4 Air + 2 OS Other Stuff 100 80 60 40 Isocost 20 0 0 20 40 Air 60 C(Q*) = 160 Price of “Other Stuff” = 2 120 Other Stuff 100 cost 200 Chosen (24,32) 80 60 40 cost 160 Low Isocost Med. Isocost High Isocost 20 0 0 20 40 Air 60 C(Q1)=120, C(Q*)=160, C(Q2)=200 120 100 Low Isocost Med. Isocost High Isocost OS 80 60 40 20 0 0 20 CAS 40 60 C(Q) • Plot Q1, Q2,Q3 against 120,160,200. • That is your cost curve. • You can choose any set of increasing Q’s given the information you have been given. Pollution Control Technology Standard • Technology is a way to do something (see above) • Technology Standard – Must use a specific technology • Building codes-one stud every 18” (done) • Safety codes: must wear your goggles in lab. • One could choose a technology standard to reduce emissions – One could (but doesn’t) require catalytic converters Effluent Standard • Effluent (or emissions) Standard – Can emit no more than X tons per (choose one) • • • • megawatt hour (output) Grams Nox per 100 km driven (output) per year (absolute!) per ton of coal burned (per input) – Obviously get very different results depending on what you choose Calif Effluent standards cars: Table 1LEV Emission Standards for Light-Duty Vehicles, FTP-75, g/mi 50,000 miles/5 years Categor y NMOGa CO NOx 100,000 miles/10 years PM HCHO NMOGa CO NOx PM HCHO Passenger cars Tier 1 0.25 3.4 0.4 0.08 - 0.31 4.2 0.6 - - TLEV 0.125 3.4 0.4 - 0.015 0.156 4.2 0.6 0.08 0.018 LEV 0.075 3.4 0.2 - 0.015 0.090 4.2 0.3 0.08 0.018 ULEV 0.040 1.7 0.2 - 0.008 0.055 2.1 0.3 0.04 0.011 LDT1, LVW <3,750 lbs Tier 1 0.25 3.4 0.4 0.08 - 0.31 4.2 0.6 - - TLEV 0.125 3.4 0.4 - 0.015 0.156 4.2 0.6 0.08 0.018 LEV 0.075 3.4 0.2 - 0.015 0.090 4.2 0.3 0.08 0.018 ULEV 0.040 1.7 0.2 - 0.008 0.055 2.1 0.3 0.04 0.011 LDT2, LVW >3,750 lbs Tier 1 0.32 4.4 0.7 0.08 - 0.40 5.5 0.97 - - TLEV 0.160 4.4 0.7 - 0.018 0.200 5.5 0.9 0.10 0.023 LEV 0.100 4.4 0.4 - 0.018 0.130 5.5 0.5 0.10 0.023 ULEV 0.050 2.2 0.4 - 0.009 0.070 2.8 0.5 0.05 0.013 a - NMHC for all Tier 1 standards Abbreviations: LVW - loaded vehicle weight (curb weight + 300 lbs) LDT - light-duty truck NMOG - non-methane organic gases HCHO - formaldehyde Calif has an • Effluent Standard • Manufacturers meet that standard by choosing a technology: –Catalytic Converters –Also tuning engines, better burn, etc • THERE IS NO requirement to choose a particular technology. Technology Based Effluent Standard (TBES) – First find a technology that reduces emissions at a reasonable cost – Find out how much emissions would go down – Then set an emissions (or effluent) standard for that amount. – Used in both Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act TBES Price of “Other Stuff” = 2 Other Stuff 150 100 Regulator knows of technique to 50 use only 20 units of Air and make 0 0 20 Q*. Inefficient Technique 40 60 Air The Regulation: • When you make Q*, you may use no more than 20 units of clean air services. You may use the technique the regulatory engineers have discovered (20,100) or any other technique that uses no more than 20 units of air and has output Q* Why this way? • Regulator knows that it can be done • Regulator has upper bound on cost • Regulator is assured of cleaning up the air. Response to TBES Technique (20,50) costs 180 and is least cost way to make Q* using 20 units of air Other Stuff 100 80 60 (20,50) 40 20 Technique (20,80), the basis for the regulation, costs 0 240 and makes Q*. 0 20 40 Air 60 Back Door Economics • Best Practicable Technology – used for water pre 1977 – means known technology at reasonable cost • Best Available Technology – used for water post 1983 – means any technology; but in practice is limited by cost • Intent: Cleaner water under BAT. What to read • Chapter 8 in BH. Example is agricultural pollution. – Isoquant = equal output – Isopleth = equal pollution An exercise • Let Q = k x, where x is an input and k is a positive number. Let w be the price of the input x. • For a given x how many ways are there of making Q? • What is the least cost way of making Q? • What is C(Q)? Conditional Factor Demand • How much of an input will be used as a function of output required and prices of inputs? • X(Q,p) • How could changing the price of clean air result in the same usage of clean air / unit output as the TBES regulations? Our Assumption • Firm’s need to dispose of waste gas, which they vent to the air. It is never free to vent the gas--it requires fans to push it out. • Firm’s can dispose of less gas and make the same output by using more of another input. For instance, by buying capital in the form of an afterburner. Air as a function of price Other Stuff I= 200*2=400 P1 = 400/25=8 250 Price of “Other Stuff” = 2 P1=8; A= 16 200 P1 = 4; A=24 150 100 50 0 0 20 40 Air 60 Price of Clean Air Conditional Factor Demand 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 10 20 Quantity of Clean Air Used In this chart the output is held constant at Q*. 30 A price for air of 13.3 Using achieves Pricesthe same level of clean air as the TBES of 20 units of air. Other Stuff 100 80 60 (20,50) 40 20 0 0 20 40 Slope on High Price line is -100/15 =Air-p1 /2 so p = 13.3. 60 Before pollution charge, it Using already Prices cost $4/unit to use the air to dispose of waste Other Stuff 100 80 60 (20,50) 40 20 0 0 20 40 Pollution charge of 13.3- 4 = 9.3 adds $465 to cost Air 60 Summary • Both a TBES and a pollution charge can produce the same level of use of clean air services and pollution. • A TBES does not cost the firm, so C(Q; TBES) < C(Q; pollution charge) when the TBES and charge result in the same use of air