Agenda • • • • • • • • • • • Business Overview Industry Overview SWOT Analysis Macroeconomic Analysis Financial Position Competitor Analysis Multiples Valuation Management Assessment Pro-forma Assumptions DCF Recommendation Business Overview Brown-Forman Corporation was founded in 1879 and engages in the manufacture, bottling, import, export, and marketing of alcoholic beverage brands. Sales mainly in the US and Europe. Expanding in Asia, Australia and penetrating the European market even more. • Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey • Finlandia Vodka • Herradura • Southern Comfort • El Jimador Tequila Industry Overview • The global alcoholic beverage industry is a multi-billion dollar a year business. • Growing shift away from mature markets in North America and Europe to newer regions such as China, Australia and Russia. • There is a plethora of small producers, however, M&A are very common. There have been four waives of consolidation in the industry: 1950-1960 in UK, 1968-1972 in Europe, 1985-1988 especially in the US and 1998 worldwide. • The industry has been incorporating concerns regarding health-related aspects and social issues in the last two decades • Production is heterogeneous and includes a number of stages SWOT Analysis Strengths: • Effective managements with increasing margins and cautious strategy • J.D. is the largest selling whiskey in the world • No shortage in supply. Large number of raw material sources Threats: • Drinking age regulation • Taxation in liquor • Uncertainty of sales of smaller brands in new markets Weaknesses: • Exposure to currency risk • High dependence of revenues on JD • Very limited target group of some of the brands Opportunities: • Expansion to new markets like China and Australia • Further penetration in the European market • Lower drinking age limitations outside the US Macroeconomic Analysis Drinking ages around the world Macroeconomic Analysis Population is expected to increase at a higher rate than in the previous years and the percentage of the younger people will decrease. Population is expected to get older on average and it is possible that brands targeting older people will experience higher demand in the long run. Macroeconomic Analysis Corn prices are expected to fall since supply will keep increasing. • The department said U.S. farmers last year produced a record 13.2 billion bushels of corn, up 8.8% from 2008. • 2010 corn estimate is "an astoundingly huge number," said Jack Scoville, VP of Price Futures Group in Chicago. Wheat prices are pretty low right now due to the large supply and are expected to fall even more in the long run. Inflation is estimated to stabilize in the short run and slightly increase in the long run. Historical inflation and projections Macroeconomic Analysis Wheat prices Corn prices Financial Position • Organic growth • Conservative in expansion • Increasing Efficiency Profitability Net Profit Margin 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% Brown Forman 15.0% Fortune Brand Diageo plc 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 2005 2006 2007 Net Profit Margin Company Name 2005 17.3% Brown Forman Fortune Brand Diageo plc 2008 2009 2006 16.5% 2007 17.5% 2008 17.0% 2009 17.5% 9.0% 9.7% 8.9% 4.1% 3.6% 20.1% 26.3% 19.9% 18.8% 17.4% Liquidity Current Ratio 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 Brown Forman 1.50 Fortune Brand Diageo plc 1.00 0.50 - 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Current Ratio Company Name 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Brown Forman 2.06 2.83 1.21 1.48 1.88 Fortune Brand 1.13 1.56 1.81 2.91 2.65 Diageo plc 1.31 1.45 1.24 1.20 1.56 Solvency EBITDA Coverage 130.0x 110.0x 90.0x 70.0x Brown Forman 50.0x Fortune Brand Diageo plc 30.0x 10.0x -10.0x 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Interest Coverage Ratio Company Name 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Brown Forman 34.2x 129.8x 36.9x 16.7x 21.1x Fortune Brand 7.5x 4.7x 4.7x 1.4x 2.3x 36.6x 37.2x 34.3x 15.7x 5.7x Diageo plc Long-term Efficiency Asset Turnover 0.80x 0.75x 0.70x 0.65x Brown Forman Fortune Brand 0.60x Diageo plc 0.55x 0.50x 0.45x 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Interest Coverage Ratio Company Name 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Brown Forman 34.2x 129.8x 36.9x 16.7x 21.1x Fortune Brand 7.5x 4.7x 4.7x 1.4x 2.3x 36.6x 37.2x 34.3x 15.7x 5.7x Diageo plc DuPont Analysis 5 step DuPont 500.0% 0.30 450.0% 0.29 400.0% 0.28 350.0% 0.27 300.0% 250.0% 0.26 Financial Leverage Asset Turnover Net Income/EBT 200.0% 0.25 150.0% 0.24 100.0% 0.23 50.0% 0.0% 0.22 1 2 3 4 5 2008 2009 6 26.0% 24.0% ROE 22.0% 20.0% 2005 2006 2007 2010 EBT/EBIT EBIT % of Sales Competitor Analysis • Diageo (DEO), registered in UK – Largest , Mkt Cap $43.94B – Famous brands: Johnnie Walker, Guinness, Bailey, Smirnoff, Hennessy • Fortune Brand (FO), registered in US – Closest competitor, Mkt Cap $8.03B – Famous brand: Jim Beam Competitor Analysis • Campari (CPR), registered in Italy – Larget in Italy, Mkt Cap $2.2B – Famous brand: SKYY • Pernod (PER), registered in France – Largest in France, Mkt Cap $17.4B – Famous brands: Absolut Vodka, Malibu, Chivas, Ricard • Remy (RMYI), registered in France – Mkt Cap $2.1B – Famous brand: Remy Martin Multiples Valuation Current Market Multiples DEO P/E 18.55 P/B 7.27 P/S 2.98 EV/EBITDA 13.72 P/E P/B P/S EV/EBITDA CPR PER RMYI FO 16.46 16.46 25.40 30.93 2.15 2.08 1.97 1.46 2.23 2.48 2.68 1.11 12.13 13.72 16.28 15.21 Median Average 18.55 21.56 2.08 2.99 2.48 2.30 13.72 14.21 P/E P/B P/S EV/EBITDA DCF Fair Value Median 53.26 26.64 30.01 60.13 50.25 Average Weight Median Average 61.8988 0.20 10.65 12.38 38.2507 0.05 1.332 1.91 27.7816 0.05 1.5 1.39 62.2914 0.40 24.05 24.92 50.25 0.30 15.08 15.08 52.61 55.67 Management Assessment Quite accurate most of the times in EPS estimation. In 2006 : Claimed 3.10 – 3.30 Result 2007 : EPS = 3.26 In 2007 : Claimed ESP ↓ by 0.2 Result 2008 : EPS ↓ by 0.4 CAPEX estimation always higher than the realized one. 2008 : 65-75M 2009 : 49M 2007 : 70M 2008 : 41M Good Brand Managers Diversified portfolio of products. Assumptions HISTORICAL REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS % Revenue Growth Growth From Acquisitions Core Growth Long Term Growth OTHER ASSUMPTIONS I/S COGS / Sales SG&A / Sales D&A / Gross PP&E Tax Rate OTHER ASSUMPTIONS B/S Cash&Equivalents / Sales Accounts Receivable / Sales Accounts Payable / COGS Inventory / COGS 2007 FORECASTED 2005 2006 2008 10.2% 9.9% 16.3% 17.0% -2.7% 10.2% 9.9% 3% 13.3% 7% 10% 2009 2010 2011 - - -2.7% 2.00% 5.00% Historical 2012 -2019 Avg 8.00% 8.1% 28.3% 26.4% 26.3% 27.0% 28.3% 32.5% 32.8% 31.9% 30.7% 28.8% 5.5% 5.3% 4.8% 5.2% 5.4% 32.7% 29.3% 31.7% 31.7% 31.0% 27.0% 31.0% 5.2% 32.5% 27.0% 30.8% 5.2% 32.5% 27.0% 30.5% 5.2% 32.5% 27.3% 31.3% 5.2% 16.6% 13.5% 12.7% 75.6% 10.0% 13.0% 13.0% 76.3% 10.0% 13.0% 13.0% 76.3% 10.0% 13.0% 13.0% 76.3% 14.4% 13.3% 13.6% 76.3% 24.4% 13.4% 14.0% 80.3% 12.8% 14.4% 16.0% 94.2% 4.6% 13.8% 14.5% 77.2% 13.7% 11.5% 10.6% 72.1% WACC Calculation CAPM Cost of equity (Ke) Beta Market risk premium 10-year yield CAPM+ Alpha ROE 7.80% 0.62 6% 4.10% 14.10% 8.60% Weights Market Cap. Total Capital Debt-Value ratio Equity-Value ratio 8,610 9,119 5.58% 94.42% WACC 10.02% Cost of Debt Cost of debt (Kd) Debt Interest Expense 7.27% 509 37 Tax Rate 32.50% Return on Equity ROE CAPM Return on Equity 40% 60% 10.32% WACC Calculation CAPM Cost of equity (Ke) Beta Market risk premium 10-year yield CAPM+ Alpha ROE 7.80% 0.62 6% 4.10% 14.10% 8.60% Weights Market Cap. Total Capital Debt-Value ratio 8,610 9,119 5.58% Equity-Value ratio 94.42% WACC 10.02% Mkt Return Mkt Premium CAPM return Alpha 1.18% -2.92% 2.30% 6.30% Cost of Debt Cost of debt (Kd) 7.27% Debt 509 Tax Rate 32.50% Return on Equity ROE 40% CAPM 60% Return on Equity 10.32% Correlations BFB correlations WAG 42.09% JKHY 41.52% MCD 35.22% DO 35.11% AEO 31.84% MOS 30.37% WFR 29.48% Correlations 42.09% 41.52% 35.22% 35.11% 31.84% WAG JKHY MCD DO AEO 30.37% MOS 29.48% WFR Recommendation • Based on the fundamental analysis and after incorporate the most significant factors: – DCF Model: $50.25 – Multiples: between $26 to $62 • Recommendation: Watch List