Casualty Actuarial Society “Risk Securitisation 101” Kymn Astwood, CA Arrow Reinsurance Company, Limited (A Goldman Sachs Group Company) 16th October, 2000 23/03/2016 3:36 Agenda 1 Insurance and the Capital Markets are Converging 2 Risk Transfer vs Risk Financing 3 Overview of the Risk-linked Securities Sector 4 Benefits of Risk-linked Securities 5 Structure of Risk-linked Securities 6 Weather Derivatives and Other Alternatives Insurance and Capital Markets are Converging 23/03/2016 3:36 Insurance and Capital Markets are Converging Corporations, Traditional Insurance and Reinsurance Markets Pricing and volatility for insurance and reinsurance 1999 – second worst catastrophe year for the P&C industry Weather hedging driven by utility deregulation Portfolio credit hedging driven by BIS rules, cyclical considerations Availability of coverage for high capacity/new exposures Capital Markets New Risk Instruments Legal and Regulatory Infrastructure Securities rulings and opinions Risk Assessment Technology Modeling firms Standard documentation Academic and governmentsponsored research SVO rating guidelines Internet-based data accessibility Rating agency expertise Concern over correlation – particularly in down markets Desire for more concrete risk assessment “Alpha-driven” investing 23/03/2016 3:36 Risk Markets Group The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Goldman, Sachs & Co. Investment Banking Division Fixed Income Currency & Commodities RISK MARKETS GROUP Trading New York London Research Arrow Re (a Bermuda Reinsurer) GS Risk Advisors (a Reinsurance Intermediary) 23/03/2016 3:36 Accessing Multiple Markets for Risk Management – Past Example United States Automobile Association (“USAA”) Capital Markets Traditional Reinsurance Retention Risk management program shown was designed for an optimal mix of coverage from reinsurance and capital markets 23/03/2016 3:36 Accessing Multiple Markets for Risk Management – Past Example SCOR (a French Reinsurer) Retrocession Retention and Capital Markets Capital Markets Retention Risk management program shown was designed for an optimal mix of coverage from reinsurance and capital markets 23/03/2016 3:36 Accessing Multiple Markets for Risk Management – Past Example XL Mid Ocean Re (a Bermuda Reinsurer) Capital Markets Reinsurance Retention Risk management program shown was designed for an optimal mix of coverage from reinsurance and capital markets 23/03/2016 3:36 Accessing Multiple Markets for Risk Management – Past Example State Farm Insurance Group (a US Insurer) Traditional Reinsurance Retention by Arrow Re Capital Markets Retention by State Farm Retention by State Farm & FHCF Risk management program shown was designed for an optimal mix of coverage from reinsurance and capital markets Risk Management Alternatives 23/03/2016 3:36 Risk Management Alternatives Reinsurance Risk Transfer Derivatives Securities FONDEN Risk Intermediary Banks Retained Risk Risk Financing Finite Reinsurance Securities 23/03/2016 3:37 Overview of Coverage Types Types of Coverage ———————Risk Financing Options —————— Risk Transfer Coverage A premium is paid in advance equaling the market price of risk Pre-Funded Coverage Post-Funded Coverage Premiums paid at levels exceeding the market price of risk. Excess builds up in a fund which is returned if there is no loss Payout determined and paid post-event. It is repaid over time. There may be a small option premium paid in advance 23/03/2016 3:37 9 Impact of Market Forces Securitization will become increasingly cost competitive with reinsurance because of the forces driving both the markets Securitization Reinsurance Hardening of retrocessional markets Problems in Australian insurance market Earthquakes in Turkey, Taiwan, Greece, Mexico Hurricanes in U.S. and Central America Higher satellite and aviation losses Problems with workers compensation market due to Unicover-managed pool Pressure to increase premiums to restore investor confidence in insurance/reinsurance stocks Industry consolidation Stable spreads with respect to BB corporate bonds Lower transaction costs Increased investor comfort with the asset class Overview of the Risk-Linked Securities Sector 23/03/2016 3:37 Overview of Risk-Linked Securities 1996-1997 First Property Risk Securitisation 1998-1999 Issuance Volume Grows to over 1bn Catastrophe per Year Securities whose returns are linked on the occurrence of events Ratings based on the probability of event occurrence Credit risk (as opposed to event), is generally minor High grade investment trust account Additional credit support 2000 Issuance Increasing, Secondary Trade Volume Tops $1bn Most bonds floating rate, 1-5 years 23/03/2016 3:37 Evaluating Risk-Linked Securities Quantifying Default Risk Probability in % 100 75 Risk-linked securities typically transfer risk in the extreme “tail” of the probability curve - low frequency but high severity 50 25 Shown on next page 0 Losses in USD 23/03/2016 3:37 Evaluating Risk-Linked Securities Typical Structure Losses ($) Securitized Risk Layer Coinsurance 0.2% Exhaustion Point Expected Loss Attachment Point 1.0% 0.2% 1.0% Retention Probability (cumulative) 23/03/2016 3:37 Sectors of the Risk Securitisation Market Catastrophe $3,880 MM Namazu Re 2.8% Mosaic Re II 1.3% Parametric Re 2.6% Mosaic Re 1.3% Juno Re 2.3% George Town Re 1.3% Residential Re I 11.4% Gemini Re 4.3% Concentric Ltd 2.8% Circle Maihama Ltd 2.8% Residential Re II 12.8% Basis Risk Securitization 0.3% Seismic Re 4.3% Winterthur 0.2% Residential Re III 5.7% SR Earthquake Fund 3.2% Residential Re Swap 1.0% Soc Gen 2.8% Trinity Re 2.0% SLF I - IV 1.6% Trinity Re 1999 1.5% MMC New Madrid Swap 1.4% Mitsui Risk Transfer Option 0.9% XL MidOcean Swap 2.8% Hedge Financial Swap 2.6% Atlas Re 5.7% Axa Risk Transfer Option 0.9% Hannover III 1.4% Hannover II 2.8% Hannover I 2.4% Gold Eagle 5.2% Pacific Re 2.3% Domestic Inc. 2.8% Halyard Re 0.5% AIG Combined Risk 0.3% 23/03/2016 3:37 Sectors of the Risk Securitisation Market Weather Derivatives/ Securitisations $4,550 MM Weather Derivatives $4,500M (est.) Kelvin Ltd $50M 23/03/2016 3:37 Sectors of the Risk Securitisation Market Default $743 MM Freddie Mac "MODERNs" $243M Gerling "SECTRS" $500M 23/03/2016 3:37 Sectors of the Risk Securitisation Market Hard Asset Value $566 MM Gramercy Place (Toyota Motor Credit) 100% 23/03/2016 3:37 Sectors of the Risk Securitisation Market Life $855 MM Hannover I 7% Hannover II 14% Hannover III 6% ASLAC Il-IV 18% Mutual Securitisation p.l.c. 50% ASLAC l 5% 23/03/2016 3:37 League Table As of September 2000 Number of Issues 24 Goldman Sachs 5 Lehman 5 Merrill Lynch 3 SBC Warburg 5 Aon Capital 1 Morgan Stanley $243 3 Citibank $253 3 Swiss Re $232 3 Salomon Smith Barney $224 1 American Re $182 $4,113 $1,400 $1,267 $631 $314 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 23/03/2016 3:37 Market Profile of Risk-linked Securities RATING BBB 7.1% B or Below 6.3% Not Rated 4.3% AAA-A 24.2% BB 58.1% 23/03/2016 3:37 Market Profile of Risk-linked Securities RISK US Earthquake 9% Japan Earthquake 10% Insolvency 13% Japan Typhoon 1.8% Tem perature 1% US Hurricane 29% Auto Lease Residual 17.9% Portfolio of Risk 17.9% 23/03/2016 3:37 Market Profile of Risk-linked Securities TERM 5 plus years 2.3% 3 to 5 years 8.6% 1 to 3 years 88.1% 23/03/2016 3:37 Current Investor Profile Catastrophe Transactions Total (Risk Capital) Distribution Geographic Sector by Sales Office Chicago 8.5% Life Insurers 16.6% Non-Life Insurers 3.9% Boston 2.9% Mutual Fund/ Investment Advisor 28.9% San Francisco 23.8% Banks 8.2% Reinsurers/ Intermediaries 21.0% Proprietary/ Hedge Funds 21.9% New York 51.0% 118 Institutional Investors London 5.2% Frankfurt 3.4% Milan 0.2% Paris 1.0% Toronto 2.7% Vancouver 0.2% Tokyo 1.6% Benefits of Risk-Linked Securities 23/03/2016 3:37 Benefits of Risk Securitization Issuer Perspective Diversification of sources of risk protection Additional capacity for certain risks / geographic areas No credit risk due to full-collateralization of securities Prompt claims payment following a loss event Clearly defined trigger reduces disputes regarding covered claims Multi-year coverage at a fixed cost may be locked in at inception Market perception as an innovator and industry leader 23/03/2016 3:37 Benefits of Risk Securitization Investor Perspective Uncorrelated Diversification can be achieved due to low correlation with equity and fixed income investments 23/03/2016 3:37 Risk-Linked Securities Pricing and Market Spreads 3Q1998 2,000 5/7/1998 Argentina 30/9/1998 (3,500-5,900+) Brazil Mexico 1,800 Russia Venezuela BB Catastrophe 1,600 BB Corporates BB Hard Asset Value Mosaic Re Class A 440 Spread over LIBOR (bp) 1,400 Pacific Re 370 1,200 Residential Re II 400 1,000 800 Residential Re 576 SR Earthquake Fund 475 Parametric Re 430 Trinity Re 367 HF Re 375 Mosaic Re II 400 Domestic Inc (Ba2/BB+) 369 600 Gold Eagle 540 Juno Re 420 400 Namazu Re 450 200 Gramercy Place Class C-1 325 XL Mid Ocean Re Tranche A 412 Trinity Re 1999 417 0 02/06/1997 13/08/1997 27/10/1997 12/01/1998 26/03/1998 09/06/1998 20/08/1998 02/11/1998 19/01/1999 Concentric Ltd (BB+) 310 01/04/1999 15/06/1999 Residential Re III 366 26/08/1999 09/11/1999 23/03/2016 3:37 Risk-Linked Securities Non-Correlation and Outperformance in Turbulent Markets Returns: 1998 Third Quarter (%) S&P 500 (11.5) Nasdaq Composite (11.5) Small Cap Stocks (Russell 2000) (20.9) European Equities (20.7) Japanese Equities (Nikkei 225) (18.1) Emerging Market Debt (10-Year+) (11.4) BB Composite (1.7) Real estate (Wilshire REIT Index) (0.9) 1.5 3-Month UST 2.7 GS Cat Bond Basket (a) 5-Year UST (25) (a) 6.5 (20) (15) (10) Trinity Re, Residential Re, Mosaic Re, Pacific Re, Parametric Re (5) 0 5 10 23/03/2016 3:37 Risk-Linked Securities Non-Correlation and Outperformance in Turbulent Markets Returns: 1999 Third Quarter (%) Japanese Equities (Nikkei 225) (1.4) Real estate (Wilshire REIT Index) (9.9) S&P 500 (7.1) Small Cap Stocks (Russell 2000) (6.0) European Equities (BE500) (4.3) BB Composite (1.9) 1.2 3-Month UST 1.5 5-Year UST 3.2 GS Cat Bond Basket (a) 3.2 Emerging Market Debt (10-Year+) 4.1 Nasdaq Composite (25) (a) (20) (15) (10) Trinity Re, Residential Re, Mosaic Re, Pacific Re, Parametric Re (5) 0 5 10 23/03/2016 3:37 Benefits of Risk Securitization Investor Perspective Uncorrelated Diversification can be achieved due to low correlation with equity and fixed income investments Attractive Risk/Return Profile compared with similarly rated corporate bonds 23/03/2016 3:37 RLS Offer Higher Returns Than Similarly-Rated Securities Summary of Risk-Linked Securitisation Transactions 14 Spread to LIBOR (%) 12 10 8 Portfolio of Risk US Hurricane US Quake and Wind Japanese Earthquake US Quake Typhoon Weather Russia Efficient Frontier Expansion 6 B-Corporate Brazil 4 2 BB-Corporate Mexico 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Expected Loss (%) 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 23/03/2016 3:37 Benefits of Risk Securitization Investor Perspective Uncorrelated Diversification can be achieved due to low correlation with equity and fixed income investments Attractive Risk/Return Profile compared with similarly rated corporate bonds Sophisticated Risk Analysis is performed by independent catastrophe-modeling firms 23/03/2016 3:37 The Role of the Expert Modeling Firm Providing a Level Playing Field for Investors Rating Agencies Objective 3rd-party quantification Proven catastrophe modeling technology Expertisation of Analysis Multi-dimensional technical support Education for all constituents Due diligence No “black box” models 23/03/2016 3:37 Benefits of Risk Securitization Investor Perspective Uncorrelated Diversification can be achieved due to low correlation with equity and fixed income investments Attractive Risk/Return Profile compared with similarly rated corporate bonds Sophisticated Risk Analysis is performed by independent catastrophe-modeling firms Liquidity is provided by the growing secondary market trading of risk-linked securities 23/03/2016 3:37 RLS – Market Liquidity Secondary Trading Volume Goldman Sachs’ Secondary Trading Volume 84.9 Aggregate Volume ($millions) 80.0 67.1 47.5 37.3 26.3 17.0 15.6 7.0 6.0 Ju n 19 b Fe 19 9.3 2.5 00 99 99 98 19 99 1.3 1.0 O ct Ju n 19 b Fe 19 98 97 19 98 2.5 4.0 3.3 1.5 O ct n 19 97 4.0 13.0 20 9.5 8.2 Ju 23.4 18.5 b 23.2 Fe 29.0 37.0 19 35.5 O ct 37.0 23/03/2016 3:37 Hurricane Bonds Trade Actively Through Storm Events Storm Category Tropical Depression Tropical Storm 1 (74-95 mph) 2 (96-110 mph) 3 (111-130 mph) 4 (131-155 mph) 5 (>155 mph) Hurricane Floyd: Residential Re Prices Basic Structure of Risk-Linked Securities 23/03/2016 3:37 Risk Securitisation Basic Structure Transaction: (risk capital of €500 million) Premium Insurer Reinsurance Contract Issuing Vehicle €500 Investors LIBOR + Premium Potential Outcomes: Event Happens Insurer Up to €500 Event Doesn’t Happen Issuing Vehicle Up to €500 Investors Case Study Alpha Wind 2000-A Ltd. Hurricane Risk Securitization (State Farm Insurance Group) 23/03/2016 3:37 Summary Structure At Issuance State Farm Reinsurance Premium Contract Premium Proceeds Alpha Wind 18 Investors A Bermuda SPV Arrow Re Retro Contract Notes $52.5 m Equity $37.5 m Trust Securities Case Study Concentric / Circle Maihama Earthquake Risk Securitization (Oriental Land Co. Ltd.) Concentric, Ltd. Floating Rate Principal-at-Risk Notes Circle Maihama, Ltd. Floating Rate Extendible Notes (FRENs) April 1999 23/03/2016 3:37 Case Study: Circle and Concentric To provide Oriental Land Co., Ltd., owner and operator of Tokyo Disneyland®, with: Purpose Fully collateralised multi-year risk transfer earthquake protection Fully collateralised post-earthquake stand-by financing facility First direct access of capital markets by corporate for catastrophe risk transfer Highlights First catastrophe contingent financing facility in Japan Parametric triggers 23/03/2016 3:37 Case Study: Circle and Concentric Summary of Terms Concentric, Ltd. Size Use of Proceeds Term Circle Maihama, Ltd. US $100 million US $100 million Invested in AAA/Aaa rated Directed Investments to collateralised Financial Contract Initially: Invested in AAA/Aaa rated Directed Investments After event: Purchase Bonds issued by Oriental Land Scheduled May 2004 (if no Trigger Event Earthquake) 5 years (due May 2004) Coupon US$ LIBOR + 310bps US$ LIBOR + 75bps Ratings BB+/Ba1/BB+ A/A Payout Structure Principal Reduction at Various Magnitudes 23/03/2016 3:37 Case Study: Circle and Concentric Underlying Earthquake Exposure Inner Circle Outer Ring Radii Inner Circle: 10 km Inner Ring: 50 km Outer Ring: 75 km Central Point Coordinates o Longitude: 139 53’ 03’’E o Latitude: 35 37’ 47’’N Narita Tokyo Yokohama Maihama and Tokyo Disneyland Chiba Boso Peninsula Trigger Structure Epicentre of Earthquake must be located within inner circle, inner ring or outer ring Frequency of Trigger Inner Ring Izu Peninsula Pacific Ocean 62.4bps 85% 40% 25% 32.5% 70% 77.5% 62.5% 62.5% 50% 47.5% 55% 37.5% 25% 6.7 6.9 75% Inner Ring Inner Circle 6.5 92.5% 100% 7.1 7.3 7.5 Japan Meteorological Agency Magnitude 100% 87.5% 50% 25% 100% 75% Outer Ring 7.7 7.9 Weather Risk Hedging 23/03/2016 3:37 Weather Risk Management First weather derivative traded in 1996 $5 billion of weather derivatives executed to date Estimated market growth $70 to $100 billion Estimated that $1 trillion of $7 trillion U.S. economy subject to weather risk 23/03/2016 3:37 Impact of Weather on Business Utilities Municipalities Weather Volumetri c Exposure s Energy Industry Resorts Beverage Producers Agricultural Industry 23/03/2016 3:37 Impact of Active Risk Management Investment Research on Peoples Energy Corp. “Strong FY1Q despite warm weather … $0.05 positive EPS impact of weather insurance … We continue to rate PGL shares Market Outperformer” “We are initiating coverage of Peoples Energy with a Market Performer Rating” 9/14/1999 10/28/1999 “We are raising our rating on PGL to Market Outperformer … Peoples recently announced it purchased a weather insurance policy that would limit the company’s annual EPS risk from warmer than normal weather to about $0.25 … while retaining all of the upside” 1/20/2000 “Strong FY2Q despite warm weather because of weather insurance … This weather insurance to date has already paid significant dividends – earnings would have been hurt an additional $0.17 year to date if no weather insurance had been purchased … Market Outperformer” 2/15/2000 4/24/2000 “Reducing FY00 estimates due to weather … Although weather has once again proved disappointing, we continue to view the purchase of insurance favorably because it does limit the downside risk … Maintain Market Outperformer Rating” 23/03/2016 3:37 Weather Risk Hydro Power Historical Hydro Dam Filling Levels in Norway Hydropower Electricity Generation in Norway Probability Distribution of Annual Rainfall Securitisation ofof Securitisation Extreme Drought Extreme Drought Risk Risk Traditional Insurance Cover for Moderate Drought Risk Drought Mean Annual Rainfall Case Study Kelvin Ltd. Weather Risk Securitization (Koch Energy Trading, Inc.) 23/03/2016 3:37 Case Study: Kelvin, Ltd Weather Risk Securitization Sponsor Koch Energy and Trading, Inc, a subsidiary of Koch Industries, Inc. One of the largest privately held corporations in the United States Based in Wichita, Kansas with more than 16,000 employees worldwide A diversified company involved in oil and gas, chemicals, plastics, energy services, chemical and environmental technology products, asphalt products, metal and mineral services, agriculture and financial services To manage weather risk embedded in Koch’s energy and agricultural businesses Purpose To create capacity in order to offer customer solutions To broaden investor participation in the weather market 23/03/2016 3:37 Case Study: Kelvin, Ltd Weather Risk Securitization Defined Portfolio Notional Amount and Risks $140MM Warm Winter Swaps Milwaukee Sioux Falls 40 $94MM Cold Winter Swaps Sault Chicago Ste. Marie 35 10 Covington 10 4 Oklahoma CityIndianapolis 10 New York 25 25 25 25 Columbus Baltimore Investor risk is cold winter Investor risk is warm winter $66.5MM Cool Summer Swaps $41MM Other Contracts Sault Ste. Marie Bismarck 3 Portland 3.5 4 Sioux Falls 15 10 2 Green Bay 3.5 San Francisco Covington 3.5 Cleveland 2 Charlotte Oklahoma 15 15 City 15 Birmingham 4 San Francisco Philadelphia 5 2 Columbus 3 Oklahoma City 2 Investor risk is hot summer Tampa Investor risk is cool summer, warm winter and cold winter (freeze) 23/03/2016 3:37 Case Study: Kelvin, Ltd Weather Risk Securitization Summary of Terms Kelvin, Ltd. First Event Senior Notes Issuer Kelvin, Ltd Description First Event Weather-Linked Fixed Rate Senior Notes Risk Capital $22 million Maturity February 14, 2003 Coupon 15.80% (at risk) Ratings B- (DCR) Annual Probability of: Annual Expected Reduction Coupon Reduction:12.1% First Dollar: 9.2% Full Reduction: 0.5% 4.45% Kelvin, Ltd. Second Event Senior Notes Issuer Kelvin, Ltd Description Second Event Weather-Linked Fixed Rate Senior Notes Risk Capital $23 million Maturity February 14, 2003 Coupon 8.70% (at risk) Ratings BBB-/BB+/BB (DCR/Fitch/S&P) 3 Year Expected Reduction 0.60% 23/03/2016 3:37 Derivative Transactions Accessing Reinsurance from Investors -- Selected Examples State Farm/Tokio Marine Swaps (April 2000) Traded $200m of Japanese earthquake exposure for Midwest earthquake directly Oriental Land Currency Swaps (May 1999) Ability to pay premium and receive compensation in Japanese yen for a $USD risk-linked security CAT Ltd. Hurricane Swap (July 1997) $35m of East Coast U.S. wind coverage linked to terms of Residential Re securities Derivative transactions offer the ease of execution of reinsurance, and permit investors in the capital markets to supplement a reinsurance program For additional information regarding this presentation, please contact: Kymn Astwood 441 296 8107 kymn.astwood@gs.com Arrow Reinsurance Company, Limited (A Goldman Sachs Group Company) 16th October, 2000