Semantics
November 30, 2012
The Last Details
• Semantics/pragmatics homework will be posted after
class today.
• Will be due on Wednesday
• Future plans:
• Today: semantics
• Monday of next week - wrap up semantics
• Wednesday: some comments on language preservation
• Friday: an opportunity to ask some review questions
• Semantics homeworks will be graded by Friday of next
week (hopefully)
The “Maxims” of Conversation
• The freedom that speakers have to use speech acts either
directly or indirectly leaves listeners with a lot of leeway in
how they interpret what has been said.
• A set of “maxims” exist for contributions to a conversation
• These maxims make conversation orderly and sensible
(more or less)
• They are not rules; they do not need to be followed.
• One can observe the maxims, dis-obey the maxims,
or even flout them.
The Cooperative Principle
• The basic, over-arching maxim is the Cooperative
Principle.
“Make your contribution such as is required, at the
stage at which it occurs, by the accepted purpose or
direction of the talk exchange in which you are
engaged.”
• Basically: what you say should further the purpose of the
conversation.
• Because of this principle, listeners will assume that
speakers
are cooperating
them. on the basis of that
• and draw
conclusionswith
(inferences)
assumption.
Flouting
• When a speaker intentionally disobeys a maxim in a way
that the listener will notice, they are flouting a maxim.
• This is done to provide information to the listener
indirectly.
• This is often done in sarcasm or irony.
• Example: What an amazing hockey player Bob is!
• If Bob has just scored an incredible goal, then this
comment is obeying the maxims of conversation.
• If Bob just missed a wide open shot, then this comment is
flouting the maxims of conversation.
• = Saying something that is clearly untrue, knowing that
the listener will notice.
Maxim #1: Relevance
• The maxim of relevance: say things that are relevant to
the topic under discussion.
• Prevents randomness and incoherence.
• Contributions are always interpreted as if they are
relevant to the conversation.
• Example 1:
Bob: Where’s Bill?
Ed: There’s a yellow VW outside Sue’s house.
• Example 2:
Bob: Isn’t Larry the biggest jerk you’ve ever met?
Ed: The weather’s sure been nice this week, hasn’t it?
Maxim #2: Quality
• Maxim of Quality:
• Don’t say what you believe to be false.
• Don’t say what you can’t back up.
• People often disagree about things like the “truth” and
“evidence”.
• Flouting the Maxim of Quality:
• Reporter: Were you celebrating your birthday last
week?
• Old film diva: Yes, I turned 39!
• Reporter: And I’m turning 150 next Monday!
Other Quality Floutings
• Example 1:
Bob: Chicago’s in Kansas, right?
Ed: And LA’s in Idaho!
• Example 2:
Queen Victoria was made of iron.
Maxim #3: Quantity
• The Maxim of Quantity:
• Make your contribution as informative as is required.
• Do not make your contribution more informative than is
required.
• In general: listeners assume they are being told everything
they need to know.
• Example: My ethically questionable lawyer friend.
Flouting Quantity
• Stating necessary truths, (tautologies, or analytic
sentences) is an example of flouting the maxim of quantity.
• War is war.
• Either Bob will come, or he won’t.
• If she does it, she does it.
Maxim #4: Manner
• The maxim of manner: be clear.
• This one breaks down into four parts:
• Avoid obscurity
• Avoid ambiguity
• Be brief
• Be orderly
• Example:
At the concert last night, Jessica Simpson produced a
series of sounds corresponding somewhat to the score of
“The Star Spangled Banner”.
Moving On
•
There are several different ways to study meaning in
language:
1. Pragmatics
The meaningful use of linguistic expressions in
conversation and discourse.
2. Compositional Semantics
How the meaning of phrases and sentences is built up
from the meanings of individual words.
3. Lexical Semantics
The meaning of individual words, and how they’re
related to one another.
Here’s a question…
•
What is “meaning”?
•
No, really. What is it? Any ideas?
•
The meaning of “meaning” seems to be very complex
and hazy.
•
For today, we’ll try to figure out what “meaning” means
for a small, simple set of data and then work from there.
•
We’ll be doing compositional semantics.
•
…and we’ll focus on the literal meaning of linguistic
expressions, for now.
Possible Worlds
• Consider this idea: we live in one of many possible
different worlds.
• There are certain true statements we can make about the
world in which we live. For instance:
If you jump up, you fall down.
The sun is about 93 million miles away.
Mars is a planet.
It’s chilly outside.
I am teaching linguistics 201.
Hobbits do not exist.
Possible Worlds
• In other possible worlds, different statements might be
true. For instance:
If you jump up, you fly off the surface of the Earth.
The sun has become a black hole.
Pluto is a planet.
The weather in Calgary is always nice.
I am married to Scarlett Johansson.
A hobbit named Frodo stole my wedding ring.
What is truth?
• How do we know that some of these statements are true,
while others are not?
• What does it mean for something to be true?
• Let’s consider the philosophical question this way:
• What sorts of things can be true?
• (hint: think in syntactic terms)
• Can a noun be true? A verb? An adjective?
• Declarative sentences can be true.
e.g., “Hobbits do not exist.”
...as opposed to interrogative or imperative sentences
(questions or commands)
A Theory of Truth
• Declarative sentences are also known as propositions.
• Let’s assume that a proposition is true if:
• the information it imparts about the world is actually the
way the world is.
• A philosophical definition:
• truth is the correspondence of propositions to facts.
• This is called the correspondence theory of truth.
• Q: What kind of information can a proposition provide
about the world?
Subjects, Predicates
• Let’s consider declarative sentences with this form:
S  NP VP
• We already know that the NP is called the subject.
• Let’s call the VP the predicate.
• Subjects refer to “persons, places or things”.
• Predicates (roughly) describe relationships between the
persons, places or things.
• Subjects are what’s in the world;
• Predicates are “the way the world is.”
One Possible World
This is the world.
One Possible World
Mars
Venus
Pluto
Earth
Mercury
Saturn
Jupiter
The Moon
Uranus
The Death Star
Neptune
This is the world.
These are different things
in the world.
One Possible World
Mars
Venus
Pluto
Earth
Mercury
Saturn
Jupiter
The Moon
Uranus
The Death Star
Neptune
is a planet
this is a predicate
Another Possible World
Mars
Venus
Earth
Pluto
Mercury
Saturn
Jupiter
The Moon
Uranus
The Death Star
Neptune
is a planet
this is a predicate
Another Possible World
Mars
Earth
Venus
Pluto
Mercury
Saturn
Jupiter
The Moon
Uranus
The Death Star
Neptune
this is a predicate
is a space station
Reference
• Note that the expression “Jupiter” is not the planet Jupiter
itself;
• It’s just a linguistic convention we can use to refer to
the actual thing.
• The actual thing (in the world) is the referent of the word
“Jupiter”.
• Another example:
“Barack Obama”
expression
referent
Reference: Another Example
“The Mona Lisa”
“La Joconde”
“La Gioconda”
expressions
referent
Remember: languages can be arbitrary.
Also important: a number of different expressions can
refer to the same thing in the world.
Extension
• A predicate is a set of referents in some possible world.
• This set of referents is known as a predicate’s extension.
Mars
Venus
Pluto
Earth
Mercury
Saturn
Jupiter
The Moon
Uranus
The Death Star
Neptune
is a planet
Finding the Truth
• With this framework in place, we have a formula for
figuring out whether or not a proposition is true.
• Formula: a proposition is true if the referent of its
subject is contained in the extension of its predicate.
• Consider the proposition: Pluto is a planet.
• The subject’s referent is:
• The predicate’s extension includes:
• Therefore, “Pluto is a planet” is a false proposition.
Truth Values
• In any possible world, a proposition may have one of two
different truth values.
• “Pluto is a planet” may be false.
or
• “Pluto is a planet” may be true.
• We can calculate a proposition’s truth value when we
know:
• what its subject refers to
• the extension of its predicate
• ...in some possible world
There is no Santa Claus
• Note that there are some expressions which have no
real-world referent:
Santa Claus
The Easter Bunny
A Unicorn
Frodo Baggins
The King of the United States
• Q: Are these meaningless expressions?
Sense
• Expressions like “The President of the United States”
have different referents in different possible worlds.
• Consider the referents of this expression in three
possible worlds:
1864: Abraham Lincoln
1904: Teddy Roosevelt
2014: Barack Obama
Alternate 2014 universe: Mitt Romney
• Idea: the sense of an expression is the set of its referents
in all possible worlds.
• (Note: the textbook refers to the sense of an expression
as its “intension”.)
Meaning
• Corollary: expressions like “Santa Claus” are not
meaningless, even though they have no referents in this
world.
• Their meaning, or “sense”, is their set of referents in all
possible worlds.
•  You can talk about Santa Claus because you know
what the world would be like if he existed.
Truth Conditions
• Within this framework, we can now make the following
claim:
• The meaning of a proposition is the set of all possible
worlds in which that proposition is true.
• Another way of saying the same thing:
The meaning of a proposition is the set of conditions in
which that proposition is true.
• I.e., its truth conditions.
• When you know the meaning of a proposition, you know
the conditions under which it can be true.
Rehashed Ad Nauseum
•
Check out this possible world:
“It can only be the thought of verdure to come, which
prompts us in the autumn to buy these dormant white
lumps of vegetable matter covered by a brown papery
skin, and lovingly to plant them and care for them. It is a
marvel to me that under this cover they are labouring
unseen at such a rate within to give us the sudden
awesome beauty of spring flowering bulbs. While winter
reigns the earth reposes but these colourless green ideas
sleep furiously.”
--C. M. Street
Compositionality
• By the way:
The idea that the meaning of a sentence can be
calculated from the meaning(s) of its parts is the
principle of compositionality.
• Consider this sentence:
The President of the United States is a white male.
• Is this true? How do you know?
• How about this sentence:
Santa Claus is a white male.
Types of Sentences
•
Propositions may be distinguished on the basis of the
kinds of worlds in which they may be true.
1. Synthetic propositions may be true or false,
depending on the state of affairs in the world.
2. Analytic propositions are always true, no matter
what the state of the world.
3. Contradictions are always false, no matter what the
state of the world.
•
Quick Write check.
Meaning Summary
• Reference: the actual thing in the world an expression
picks out.
• Extension: a set of referents (= a predicate) in some
possible world.
• Sense: what an expression refers to in all possible worlds.
• Truth: a proposition is true if the referent of its subject is
contained in the extension of its predicate.
• Meaning:
• The meaning of a proposition is the set of conditions in
which that proposition is true.
• Truth conditions