Bewertungsbogen Kurzreferate (englisch)
Evaluation form for short presentations
Note
Name: ____________________________
1
2
3
Content
Information is accurate
and current.
Presentation is wellstructured.
Student can give
elaborate answers to
questions on the subject.
Information is not
always clear.
Presentation is usually
well-structured.
Student can answer
questions on the subject
appropriately.
Vocabulary and
grammar
Good range, varied
formulation to avoid
repetition.
The majority of
sentences are error-free;
text contains only
minimal errors that do
not interfere with
comprehension.
Speaks clearly during
the entire presentation.
Audience can follow the
presentation easily.
Information is almost
always accurate and
current.
Presentation is mostly
well-structured.
Student can mostly give
elaborate answers to
questions on the subject.
Good range, some varied
formulation to avoid
repetition.
The majority of
sentences are error-free;
text contains only
minimal errors that
hardly interfere with
comprehension.
Speaks clearly during
most of the presentation.
Audience can follow the
presentation.
Direct eye contact.
Speaks freely,
almost not looking at
notes.
Uses body language to
emphasize meaning.
Mainly direct eye
contact.
Speaks freely, seldom
returns to notes.
Sometimes uses body
language.
Intonation and
pronunciation
Presentation
© Ernst Klett Verlag GmbH, Stuttgart 2014 | www.klett.de
Von dieser Druckvorlage ist die Vervielfältigung für den eigenen Unterrichtsgebrauch
gestattet. Die Kopiergebühren sind abgegolten. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.
Grade: __________________
5
6
Information is
sometimes incomplete or
inaccurate.
Structure of presentation
is confusing.
Student can sufficiently
answer questions on the
subject.
Sufficient range, can
Basic range, lexical gaps
express ideas effectively. and repetition occur.
Text contains occasional Text contains frequent
error but it is clear what errors that can cause
he/she is trying to
some difficulties for the
express.
audience.
Information is
incomplete or inaccurate.
Structure of presentation
is inconsistent.
Student can hardly
answer questions on the
subject.
Too little information to
be valued.
No apparent structure of
presentation.
Student cannot answer
questions on the subject.
Basic range, many
lexical gaps and
repetition occur.
Text contains frequent
errors that cause
difficulties for the
audience.
No range, vocabulary is
too basic to express
ideas adequately.
Text contains frequent
errors that severely
distort the meaning.
Speaks quite clearly with
few pronunciation
mistakes.
Audience can follow the
presentation with little
effort.
Some eye contact with
audience.
Reads occasionally from
notes.
Body language remains
neutral throughout the
presentation.
.
Voice and pronunciation
are unclear during most
of the presentation.
Audience has problems
following the
presentation.
Almost no eye contact
with audience.
Reads repeatedly from
notes.
Often hides behind cue
cards or desk.
Voice and pronunciation
are unclear during the
whole presentation.
Audience can’t follow
the presentation.
Autoren: Katrin Mürschberger, Roth; Alexandra Schärtl, Regensburg
4
Kl. 8
Voice and pronunciation
are unclear during some
of the presentation.
Audience can follow the
presentation with some
effort.
Tries some eye contact
with audience, but
reads repeatedly from
notes.
Sometimes tries to hide
behind cue cards or
desk.
No eye contact with
audience.
Reads from notes
throughout the
presentation.
Body language
inadequate for
presentation.