Surgical site infections in tertiary care hospital

advertisement
International J. of Healthcare and Biomedical Research, Volume: 2, Issue: 3 , April 2014 , Pages 152-161
Original article:
Surgical site infections in tertiary care hospital
Fadnis MP ,Desai S, Kagal A, Bharadwaj R
Dept of Microbiology, B.J. Medical college, Pune , India
Corresponding author: Dr Fadnis MP
Abstract:
Introduction: Infections that occur in the wound created by an invasive surgical procedure are generally referred to as surgical
site infections (SSIs). The present study was conducted to find out incidence of SSIs, correlate it with various risk factors and
find the pathogens causing these infections with their antibiotic profile.
METHODS: This prospective study included 90 cases, admitted for clean and clean-contaminated surgeries, in the months of
June-July 2011. They were assessed preoperatively, operatively and postoperatively till 30 days of their operation to detect any
SSI. Information which was collected were age, sex, patient’s risk factors like diabetic status, smoking , obesity, type of surgery
( clean or clean contaminated), duration of surgery, insertion of drain, duration of stay. Once wound infection was suspected
swabs were collected from these sites and were cultured on Blood agar and Maconkey agar. The data obtained was statistically
analyzed by chi square test and Odds Ratio (OR).
RESULTS: The rate of SSI was 20%.The clean –contaminated cases had 1.75
times more risk of SSI as compared to clean
cases. SSI was more in patients with diabetes (OR= 2.38), smoking (OR=2.08), obesity i.e. patients having BMI >30 (P<0.001),
duration of surgery of more than 2 hours (P<0.002), preoperative hospital stay of more than 14 days(OR=4.2), use of drains
(P<0.005),and ASA score of >1.The most common organism isolated was Esherichia coli (38.89%),followed by Klebsiella
pneumoniae
(22.22%),
Acinetobacter
baumani
(22.22%)
,Staphylococcus
aureus(16.67%),and
Pseudomonas
aeruginosa(5.56%).All the Esherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated were ESBLs producer and all the Staphylococci
aureus were MRSA.
CONCLUSIONS: To conclude, in the present study surgical site infection incidence rate was 20%. Failure of antibiotic
prophylaxis seen in the present study gives importance to appropriate feedback to the surgeons which would help them in
choosing proper antibiotic for prophylaxis. The achievable preventive measures should be taken to save the economic burden on
patient and hospital community as a whole.
KEYWORDS: Antibiotics , Prophylaxis
Download