Uploaded by Lewis Karani

Under Armour

advertisement
Running Head: UNDER AMOUR CASE STUDY
Under Amour Case Study
BUS 2600
Nishimwe Francine
Business Policy – Case # 1
1
UNDER AMOUR CASE STUDY
2
Under Amour Case Study
Kevin Prank, a former football player, started the sportswear firm Under Armour in 1996.
Its purpose was to build successful materials that would regulate body temperature and ensure
conducive feeling regardless of the environment or activity intensity. Plank sold 500 shirts for
$17,000 by the end of 1996, according to Under Armour. Since then, Under Armour has
expanded to 15 000 retail locations throughout the world, including 153 of those in the United
States. Under Armour has a global revenue of 5.2 billion dollars and employs around 15,800
people (John et al,.2021, pp.292). The company requires a high level of dynamic capabilities to
deal with rapid environmental factors and capitalize on advancement potential. Its goal is to
improve all athletes via passion, innovation, and an endless search for new ideas.
Corporate Governance
Under Armour's goal is to make all the customers happy. As it expands into a global
company, it is committed to honoring its vision and values in everything they do. The Executive
Board has established corporate policies to provide a framework for operating and conducting
business to achieve its goal. Mr. Plank was appointed Executive Chairman and Brand Chief of
the company in January 2020. He is the most experienced employee in that company since he
was the President from 1996 to 2008. Under Amour has a Code of Conduct that outlines the
expectations of customers. The experts strive to make our Vision, Mission, and Value a reality
through our business practices (Brockhaus et al,. 2019). The revised Code of Conduct stresses
the importance of teammates willing to speak up and the tools available to all those who review
an ethical concern.
External Environment
UNDER AMOUR CASE STUDY
3
Several external factors have been either facilitating the growth or hindering the success
of Under Amour company.
Political Factors; In 2017, Mr. Plank made the mistake of openly calling Donald Trump "an
advantage to America," He received massive criticism from the general public and even Stephen
Curry, a prominent brand advocate.
Legal Factors; In 2017, the Newspaper released an article accusing Under Armour of accounting
fraud, resulting in a complicated affair. To maintain the brand from collapsing under the pressure
of underperformance, the revenues and profit generated in 2016-2017 were fraudulently stated to
make it appear much healthy than they were. The situation caused many problems because it
undermined the brand's credibility (John et al,.2021, pp. 302). Indeed, as a result of the issue, the
Portnoy Law Firm in Los Angeles is clear that Under Armor, investors should be cautious with
their money and aware of the legal possibilities for returning their investment to avoid any severe
losses.
Economic Factor; As a result of a covid-19 outbreak, the business has encountered difficulty,
and Under Armor has taken the short end of the stick. They have experienced substantial losses
throughout this time. Considering the difficulties of conducting regular business in lockdown
scenarios, several establishments were compelled to close during the epidemic (Warnock and
Begley 2019). Despite the virus affecting the whole fashion sector, Under Amour fared the
poorest of all the big firms, particularly in sportswear, because it was not as immediately sought
after by clients as gyms in many countries were closed as a result of Covid-19. As a result,
working out does not necessitate athletic attire.
Competition; Under Armour's primary competitors are Nike and Adidas. Both organizations are
more established than Under Amour, with higher annual revenues. The competition between the
UNDER AMOUR CASE STUDY
4
two corporations is unhealthy because it has already established its market through advertising,
sales agents, well-known football teams, and online marketing (James and Whitney 2018).
Internal Environment
These are the factors within the company that impact the success and approach to
operations:
Finance; The financial structure of the organization establishes the potential losses. It is also
affected by the payments and customer systems of the firm. Changes in interest rates, for
instance, or being overly dependent on a single client, for example, can influence a company's
bottom line.
Organizational and Operational; These are part of the administrative and operational
procedures. This includes sloppy or inaccurate record-keeping. Supply chain disruptions, as well
as outdated or defective IT systems, must be considered (Kim and Zhang, 2020). If this is not
resolved, customers perceive they will be untrustworthy. This issue has been affecting the
growth of the under-amour company, which led to disagreement between the employees.
Innovation; Any business must innovate to stay relevant and competitive. Marketing is an
essential part of the innovation process. Advertising materials in the marketing strategy, staff
training, including employee welfare are all possibilities (John et al,.2021, pp.298) Embracing
new technologies is a superb method to keep up with technological progress. A lack of creativity
can be a danger for a growing firm, for example, if another company has the same problem.
Analysis of Strategic Factors
Strengths
UNDER AMOUR CASE STUDY
5
Portfolio; The extensive product assortment of Under Armor has enhanced the company's
standing. The business is not dependent on a particular product (Montgomery et al,. 2018) It also
ensures that its sales ratio remains high and continues to grow.
Distribution Networks; Under Armor has stunned investors with its rapidly rising market.
It was facilitated by the company's unique distribution strategy, which involved using several
distribution networks.
Adoption of Digital Apps; Under Armour has responded to digitalization with
applications like Map My Fitness which has improved its sales elevation, allowing it to expand
its funds and realize its disruptive manufacturing capability.
Brand Recognition; Under Armour was named the sixth most valued corporation brand in
the world in 2017, and it has developed its brand and integrity because of its brand awareness.
Weakness
Poor Expansion Strategies; Under Armour makes the mistake of concentrating on direct
selling rather than internet sales as just a long-term development prospect.
Low adoption of e-commerce; Unlike other brands, Under Armour's e-commerce rollout
has been gradual. Alot of its current customers are accustomed to purchasing things in-store and
paying slowly, making the shift to e-commerce difficult.
High Investment Expenditure; Under Armour had taken a risk by increasing its
investment spending over the last three years. Within the last two years, it invested $847 477,000
and $153 312,000 consecutively. Its 2017 makeover has raised spending, with more costs to
come.
Opportunities
UNDER AMOUR CASE STUDY
6
Emphasis on Women's Apparel; With these unknowns in 2020, UA female sporting kit
sales in the United States rose by 77 percent from January until May 2020 compared to the same
duration in 2019. These increases demonstrate the massive potential of focusing on female
clothes.
Global Markets; Under Armour has more potential profits and wins new clients in
overseas markets. Its sales climbed by 57% in the mid of 2017. This statistic indicates a great
future.
Collaboration; When Kohl's began to sell Under Armour's goods in 2017, the company
began cooperating with stores like Kohl's. According to Kevin Marshall, CEO of Kohl's, the
relationship was a success.
Threats
Political Polarization; As a consequence of the Trump administration, the corporation
was recently entangled in a scandal. CEO Kevin Plank first supported President Trump, but he
later withdrew his backing after his actions sparked public criticism (Jackson et al,. 2018). The
company's capacity to operate in the face of political divisiveness has been compromised due to
this controversy.
Product Capabilities; Under Amour’s headbands and sports, cups have been condemned
by experts for the possibility of creating sporting wounds. Injuries produced by its products can
tarnish the company’s image and start driving deals.
Strategic Alternatives and Recommended Strategy
The need for differentiation as well as a new product line; The company should consider
more new sports merchandise and concepts. It is insufficient to concentrate solely on high-
UNDER AMOUR CASE STUDY
7
quality apparel and footwear. People, particularly women, want additional opportunities and
options, so the chosen accessory approach must be updated regularly.
Global Expansion; Promoting UA items abroad could help the company stay profitable in
the future. It's critical to gain a substantial market share across several countries and show that
quality is consistent across borders. Under Armor gives everybody an equal chance, regardless of
their moral, ethnic, or other differences. It is vital to pay attention to its competitors (Nike or
Adidas).
Focus on technology; To remain competitive in the sports sector, UA must focus more on
the technical aspects of its operations. The key options that can be provided to the UA team with
modern ITs include research online of client demands and expectations, direct contact with
current and prospective consumers, and 24/7 assistance
Implementation
The concept of product uniqueness appears to be the most important and requires the
least amount of time to execute. Under Armor has already proved its capacity to differentiate
between female and male items. Even so, men and women have very different needs. It is also
feasible to introduce a new product line centered on a family and brings together both masculine
and female interests. Involve the marketing research team in collecting data, conducting surveys,
and evaluating various groups of individuals to clarify what people know regarding UA and its
goods. Assess the companies' prospective earnings and profits if many items are sold
simultaneously, then implement the strategy as soon as the advantage is identified.
UNDER AMOUR CASE STUDY
8
References
Brockhaus, S., Fawcett, S. E., Hobbs, S., & Schwarze, A. S. (2019). Boldly going where firms
have gone before? Understanding the evolution of supplier codes of conduct. The
International Journal of Logistics Management.
Jackson, M., Kennedy, D., & O’Rourke, J. S. (2018). Under Armour and the Election of 2016:
The Intersection of Politics and Business. The Eugene D. Fanning Center for Business
Communication, Mendoza College of Business, University of Notre Dame.
James, C. R., & Whitney, K. (2018). Under Armour: repositioning for the global stage. The
CASE Journal.
John E. Gamble, Margaret A. Peteraf, Arthur A. Thomson jr. Case Studies in Strategic
Management. Springer (2021) 281-465
Kim, E., & Zhang, J. J. (2020). Strategic visionary management as enabler of commercial sport
management. In Managing Sport Across Borders (pp. 41-63). Routledge.
Montgomery, R. T., Ogden, J. A., & Boehmke, B. C. (2018). A quantified Kraljic Portfolio
Matrix: Using decision analysis for strategic purchasing. Journal of Purchasing and
Supply Management, 24(3), 192-203.
Warnock, F. E., & Begley, J. A. (2019). Doing Business: A Managerial Perspective.
Download